Religion, Law and Social Stability in Australia This Paper Considers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religion, Law and Social Stability in Australia This Paper Considers Religion, Law and Social Stability in Australia I urge then, first of all that petitions, prayers, intercessions and thanksgiving should be offered for everyone, for kings and others in authority, so that we may be able to live peaceful and quiet lives with all devotion and propriety.1 This paper considers religion, religious tolerance and the law and their importance in maintaining social stability in Australia. In order to address that question, the paper will very briefly consider the influence of religion in the foundation and development of Australia before considering the place of religion in contemporary Australian society. With this background, the paper will then consider the extent to which religion and the law find themselves in conflict in Australia before expressing some views on the implication of those conflicts for Australia’s social stability. In many ways, contemporary Australia appears to be a model of religious tolerance. The European colonisation of Australia began in 1788 as the result of a decision by the English parliament to establish a new penal colony. When New South Wales was first colonised Governor Phillip took a particularly sectarian oath of office as governor by swearing “allegiance to the King and to the protestant succession, whilst repudiating Romish beliefs in the transubstantiation of the Eucharist.”2 Subsequent early governors took an oath of office which also included these words. Although a significant number of the convicts transported to the new colony were both Irish and Catholic, despite many very polite requests, it was 28 years before the Colonial Office in Britain allowed official Catholic chaplains into the colony and it was only after 1820 that Catholic convicts were no longer often forced to attend Anglican services.3 Given that background it is remarkable, in many respects, that when the colonies federated only 80 years later the new Australian Commonwealth’s Constitution specifically eschewed an establishment religion4 The overt sectarianism which was prevalent, most obviously in employment practices, in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s has really disappeared5 and it is difficult to imagine that very basic religious freedom to worship within a person’s own faith tradition would be impinged in Australia. A comprehensive demographic study of more than 230 countries and territories conducted by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life in 2010 estimated that there were then 5.8 billion religiously affiliated adults and children around the world which represented 84% of the 2010 world population of 6.9 billion. On these figures worldwide, more than eight-in-ten people identified with a religious group.6 Statistical evidence 1 1 Tim 2:1-2 New Jerusalem Bible (NJB). Unless otherwise specified all references to scripture in this paper will be to the NJB. 2 Roy Williams, Post God Nation? How religion fell off the radar in Australia – and what might be done to get it back on. (ABC Books, 2015) 28 3 Ibid 29 4 Australian Constitution s116 5 This is a major change. As Roy Williams writes in In God They Trust, (Bible Society, 2013 ) 20 “[U]ntil the 1970s sectarianism was rife, and Catholics were a mistrusted minority. To be labelled a “tyke” or a “mick” or a “papist” was often a barrier to advancement in the professions, and in some government departments as well.” 6 Pew Forum, “The Global Religious Landscape”, December 18, 2012 http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/ 1 supports the view that religion is growing and will continue to grow globally such that it is projected that about 9-in-10 people will be affiliated with religion in 2030 compared with 8- in-10 in 1970, according to the World Religion Database.7 At the same time human mobility is at historically high levels and so religious minorities are very common in most parts of the world. This presents many societies with the challenge of how seriously to take the protection of religious liberty. Whilst the religious landscape of Australia is a constantly evolving one, Australia certainly has deep historical Christian roots 8 and a very substantial majority of Australians continue to identify themselves with religious traditions when asked. From the first census in 1911, the majority of Australians have identified as Christians.9 Whilst this affiliation has been declining from 96% in 1911 to 61% in 2011 the Christian faith traditions continue to be dominant in Australia although the numbers of adherents of other faiths and of 'No Religion' have been increasing. Between 2001 and 2011 the proportion of the Australian population identifying with a Christian faith tradition fell from 68% in 2001 to 61% in 2011 and this trend was also evident in the two most commonly reported denominations: Catholicism and Anglicanism. In 2001, 27% of the population reported an affiliation to Catholicism and this had fallen to 25% of the population in 2011. The decline was slightly larger for Anglicans falling from 21% of the Australian population in 2001 to 17% in 2011. Whilst these large denominations experienced falls, some of the smaller Christian denominations increased over this period. In particular the number of Pentecostals increased by one-fifth from 1.0% of the population in 2001 to 1.1% in 2011. Between 2001 and 2011, the number of people reporting a faith tradition other than-Christianity increased markedly, from around 0.9 million to 1.5 million, that represented a growth from 4.9% in 2001 to 7.2% of the total Australian population in 2011. Buddhism was the most popular (2.5% of the population) followed by Islam (2.2%) and Hinduism (1.3%). The greatest growth was in, Hinduism (growing by 189% in the decade from 2001 to 275,500, followed by Islam (growing by 69% in the same period to 476,300) and Buddhism (which grew by 48% to 529,000 people). The numbers of 'No Religion' respondents also increased substantially, from 15% of the population in 2001 to 22% in 2011. The growth was strongest among the young, with 28% of those aged 15-34 reporting no religious affiliation. Over half of the overseas-born population (56%) reported a Christian denomination with Catholicism (24%) and Anglicanism (12%) being the most popular. Nineteen percent of those Australians born overseas-born reported non-Christian religions with Buddhism (6.8%), Islam (5.4%) and Hinduism (4.3%) being the most common and reflecting the increasing number of migrants from non-European backgrounds. The overseas born population reported 'No religion' (20%) 7 Brian Grim, “If Policy Makers Cared About Data, They’d Care About Freedom of Religion or Belief” 29 September 2014 http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/cornerstone/if-policy-makers-cared-about-data-they- d-care-about-freedom-of-religion-or-belief-forb 8 A detailed examination of the influence of Christianity is well beyond this short paper but a good survey can be found in Williams n2 above 1-141 9 Australian Bureau of Statistics report “2071.0 - Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 Census, 2012– 20139 http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/2071.0main+features902012-2013 2 at a slightly lower level than did the Australian population as a whole (22%).10 The fact that Australia continues to welcome about 190,000 migrants each year under the official Migration Programme, that immigration levels can change and that there are, of course, no religious tests for immigrant means that the attitudes of a not insubstantial percentage of the population cannot be predicted and change each year. Whilst Australia is often described as being in a “post-Christian” era,11 it is quite clear that a very substantial proportion of the Australian population continue to consider themselves to be Christians and that Australia continues to grow in religious diversity. To a visitor to Australia, in 2015, many outward signs would suggest a strong respect for religious freedom: there is Federal and State government funding for religious schools, there are two national Catholic universities (The University of Notre Dame Australia and the Australian Catholic University), churches and other places of worship are prominent in cities, suburbs and towns and are generally well maintained and there are many hospitals, charities, retirement homes, clubs and other institutions operated by religious organisations which are an everyday feature of Australian life. Religious people do not face threats to their life and property as they do in Iraq or Syria or many other places in the world.12 Outward appearances can prove quite deceptive and the views of those of religious faith and particularly those of the author’s faith tradition, Catholicism, are subject to regular attack often because of their faith. The former High Court judge and leading Australian intellectual, the Honourable Dyson Heydon AC QC, has made the following observation: Until about the 1960s Australian society was marked by sectarianism. It took several forms. For example, particularly in country towns, Catholics were derisively referred to in non-Catholic circles; perhaps the opposite position also prevailed. Professional firms were to some extent organised along sectarian lines: Catholic firms employed Catholics and no-one else, Presbyterian firms employed Presbyterians and no-one else, and Catholics were not easily employable in other non-Catholic firms. In due course, all that changed. There had been very few Catholic judges in New South Wales before the McGirr Government came into office in 1941; since then there have been many, including
Recommended publications
  • Sacrificing Steve
    Cultural Studies Review volume 16 number 2 September 2010 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/csrj/index pp. 179–93 Luke Carman 2010 Sacrificing Steve How I Killed the Crocodile Hunter LUKE CARMAN UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY There has been a long campaign claiming that in a changed world and in a changed Australia, the values and symbols of old Australia are exclusive, oppressive and irrelevant. The campaign does not appear to have succeeded.1 Let’s begin this paper with a peculiar point of departure. Let’s abjure for the moment the approved conventions of academic discussion and begin not with the obligatory expounding of some contextualising theoretical locus, but instead with an immersion much more personal. Let’s embrace the pure, shattering honesty of humiliation. Let’s begin with a tale of shame and, for the sake of practicality, let’s make it mine. Early in September 2006, I was desperately trying to finish a paper on Australian representations of masculinity. The deadline had crept up on me, and I was caught struggling for a focusing point. I wanted a figure to drape my argument upon, one that would fit into a complicated and altogether shaky coagulation of ideas surrounding Australian icons, legends and images—someone who perfectly ISSN 1837-8692 straddled an exploration of masculine constructions within a framework of cringing insecurities and historical silences. I could think of men, I could think of iconic men, and I could think of them in limitless abundance, but none of them encapsulated everything I wanted to say.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 1 2016.Pub
    90 Reproductive coercion and the Australian state: A new chapter? Patricia Hayes Victoria University While the concept of reproductive coercion is most commonly used in understanding tactics employed by some male perpetrators of violence against women, it is also used to identify policy and legislative environments of nation states that may be supportive of reducing women’s levels of autonomy and self-determination in relation to their reproductive health and family planning decisions. The offshore detention immigration policies of successive Australian governments have created several cases over the last decade where community workers in Australia have had to identify and understand how best to work with the power relations inherent in counselling work with women as asylum seekers who are making decisions about their pregnancies in the context of state-based reproductive coercion. The answer to working with this complex ethical issue lies beyond the scope of mere interpersonal and intra-psychic counselling interventions. stark. The capacity of women in offshore detention to provide ‘free and full consent’ to an ‘autonomous choice’ of either continuing their pregnancy or having an abortion is strongly compromised by their involuntary detention. It is worth remembering that this detention is mandatory and women are detained without proof of a crime being committed, the luxury of a trial or recourse to a timely appeal process, courtesy of the immigration policies of the Australian Government. The power relations inherent within such a relationship prompt the question: Does the phenomenon Illustration: Australian Financial Review, of women making decisions about their September 2015. Copyright David Rowe/ pregnancies in this environment herald a Fairfax Syndication, Reproduced with new chapter in a history of reproductive permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Anxieties in Australian Education
    President’s address to the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Queensland, 30 November-4 December 2008. Quote at the risk of knowing that I change my mind frequently. No Country For Young People? Anxieties in Australian education Noel Gough La Trobe University, Victoria Preamble I thank the membership of AARE for the privilege of being President of our Association in 2008. Our 2007 annual conference began on the day following the last federal election and I think it is fair to say that Kevin Rudd’s decisive victory – coupled with some delight at seeing John Howard defeated and unseated – led many of us to approach 2008 with cautious optimism. Any optimism I felt a year ago was short-lived, lasting only a month or two beyond the Rudd government’s apology to indigenous Australians on 13 February, for which I have unreserved respect and admiration. But on many other matters that concern me deeply – especially in the areas of education, environment and the arts – the new government’s words and deeds increasingly fell short of the very reasonable expectations conjured . I sensed quite soon that some of my close colleagues were similarly underwhelmed. For example, I recall that at an ARDEN1 meeting in early March, one outcome of a working group’s deliberations on the determinants of possible futures for educational research was to ask: how long before Kevin Rudd becomes Tony Blair? I am disposed to read educational problems and issues intertextually – to deliberately put them into intertextual ‘play’ with other cultural texts, such as popular songs, novels, movies and artworks.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Australia
    HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 2000-01 High Court of Australia Canberra ACT 7 December 2001 Dear Attorney, In accordance with Section 47 of the High Court of Australia Act 1979, I submit on behalf of the Court and with its approval a report relating to the administration of the affairs of the High Court of Australia under Section 17 of the Act for the year ended 30 June 2001, together with financial statements in respect of the year in the form approved by the Minister for Finance. Sub-section 47(3) of the Act requires you to cause a copy of this report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after its receipt by you. Yours sincerely, (C.M. DOOGAN) Chief Executive and Principal Registrar of the High Court of Australia The Honourable D. Williams, AM, QC, MP Attorney-General Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 CONTENTS Page PART I - PREAMBLE Aids to Access 4 PART II - INTRODUCTION Chief Justice Gleeson 5 Justice Gaudron 5 Justice McHugh 6 Justice Gummow 6 Justice Kirby 6 Justice Hayne 7 Justice Callinan 7 PART III - THE YEAR IN REVIEW Changes in Proceedings 8 Self Represented Litigants 8 The Court and the Public 8 Developments in Information Technology 8 Links and Visits 8 PART IV - BACKGROUND INFORMATION Establishment 9 Functions and Powers 9 Sittings of the Court 9 Seat of the Court 11 Appointment of Justices of the High Court 12 Composition of the Court 12 Former Chief Justices and Justices of the Court 13 PART V - ADMINISTRATION General 14 External Scrutiny 14 Ecologically Sustainable Development
    [Show full text]
  • July 2009 VES NSW Newsletter
    You will be asked to vote on the adoption of the new name at the next General Meeting of the society on August 9th 2009. Proxy forms are enclosed with this newsletter if you would like to vote and cannot attend the meeting. is in calling for volunteers, say for the Olympics. Calling for volunteers for VE is NOT appropriate. • We need to align our discussions of dying within the context of a continuum that includes palliative care and end-of-life choice. There can be many steps in a person’s process of dying. • There should be a nexus in the public’s mind between palliative, end-of-life care and physician-assisted dying. • It is important to our members and supporters to provide information to encourage people to have conversations with their doctors about their end-of-life healthcare decisions and to promote of the use of reliable Dear members advance health care directives, so that fewer families Your committee has voted to recommend a change of name to and healthcare providers will have to struggle with making difficult decisions in the absence of guidance from the patient. DYING WITH DIGNITY NSW • The new name will encourage discussion about a practice This new name will be voted on at the next General Meeting. that is happening covertly. We propose that physician-assisted dying become a legally accepted and protected element in medical As many of you are aware, VESnsw has had lengthy and in-depth practice—an option for patients who want it and ask for it and for discussions over many years about the pros and cons of such a doctors who are sympathetic and wish to participate, with a process move.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Resistance to German State Persecution: Lessons for Modern Australia
    Catholic Resistance to German State Persecution: Lessons for Modern Australia The Hon. Dyson Heydon AC QC The 2014 Annual Acton Lecture delivered on 10 April 2014 at Banco Court, Supreme Court of NSW CIS Occasional Paper 134 2014 Published June 2014 by The Centre for Independent Studies Limited PO Box 92, St Leonards, NSW, 1590 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cis.org.au Views expressed in the publications of The Centre for Independent Studies are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre’s staff, advisers, directors, or officers. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: ©2014 The Centre for Independent Studies Design by Ryan Acosta Copy edited by Mangai Pitchai Cover images source: deutschemark.tumblr.com Introduction Peter Kurti ood evening, ladies and gentlemen—it’s a pleasure for me to welcome you to the Banco Court in the Supreme Court of NSW and to the 2014 Acton Lecture presented by GThe Centre for Independent Studies. We are most grateful to His Honour the Chief Justice for granting us permission to use the court this evening. I’m Peter Kurti, a Research Fellow at the CIS, and I coordinate the Religion and Free Society program at the Centre, the program within which the annual Acton Lecture takes place. The Religion and the Free Society program at the CIS reflects upon questions of religious freedom in Australia and overseas. It is, I think, quite a remarkable thing for a secular think tank such as the CIS to include within its scope a program such as Religion and the Free Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Turner Freeman Lawyers Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union Amalgamation Anniversary Dinner, Sydney Present at the Creatio
    2661 TURNER FREEMAN LAWYERS AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS’ UNION AMALGAMATION ANNIVERSARY DINNER, SYDNEY PRESENT AT THE CREATION – THE STRANGE, EVENTFUL BIRTH OF THE AMWU 8 NOVEMBER 2012 The Honourable Michael Kirby AC CMG TURNER FREEMAN LAWYERS AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS’ UNION AMALGAMATION ANNIVERSARY DINNER, SYDNEY 8 NOVEMBER 2012 PRESENT AT THE CREATION: THE STRANGE EVENTFUL BIRTH OF THE AMWU* THE HON. MICHAEL KIRBY AC CMG** ABSTRACT The author was one of the counsel who assisted in achieving the amalgamation of the three industrial organisations of employees that formed the AMWU in 1972. In this article, based on address to a dinner celebrating the 40th anniversary of this event, he describes the hard fought battles that proceeded amalgamation, including contested proceedings before the High Court of Australia in ex parte Bevan (1972) 172 CLR 1; the Commonwealth Industrial Court in Drinkwater v Amos (1972) 20 FLR 359; and the Arbitration Commission. From these experiences he derives lessons about the role of courts and tribunals in industrial relations; the role of well targeted industrial advocacy; the advantages of the old system of conciliation and arbitration; and the need to simplify the system of amalgamation. He also reflects on the idealistic quality of union leadership in 1972 and contrasts this with some cases today. The history of Australia is intertwined with the history of the labour movement. The great maritime strikes of the 1890s led to co-operation amongst the industrial unions in the several Australian colonies. That co-operation focused attention upon the need to develop a new province of law to supplement the imperfections of the common law and the defects of collective bargaining1.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism and the 'Woman As Mother' Discourse in Reproductive Politics In
    Feminism and the ‘Woman Equals Mother’ Discourse in Reproductive Politics in Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Discipline of Gender, Work and Social Inquiry School of Social Sciences Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Adelaide April 2012 Angella Duvnjak BA(Hons) (Adelaide University) BSW (Flinders University) i ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................... v Declaration ........................................................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background: The journey to ‘here’ 1 1.2 Time, Context and Structure of the Thesis 5 1.2.1 Situating the research questions .................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Research questions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judges and Retirement Ages
    JUDGES AND RETIREMENT AGES ALYSIA B LACKHAM* All Commonwealth, state and territory judges in Australia are subject to mandatory retirement ages. While the 1977 referendum, which introduced judicial retirement ages for the Australian federal judiciary, commanded broad public support, this article argues that the aims of judicial retirement ages are no longer valid in a modern society. Judicial retirement ages may be causing undue expense to the public purse and depriving the judiciary of skilled adjudicators. They are also contrary to contemporary notions of age equality. Therefore, demographic change warrants a reconsideration of s 72 of the Constitution and other statutes setting judicial retirement ages. This article sets out three alternatives to the current system of judicial retirement ages. It concludes that the best option is to remove age-based limitations on judicial tenure. CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 739 II Judicial Retirement Ages in Australia ................................................................... 740 A Federal Judiciary .......................................................................................... 740 B Australian States and Territories ............................................................... 745 III Criticism of Judicial Retirement Ages ................................................................... 752 A Critiques of Arguments in Favour of Retirement Ages ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Fiction, Young Adult Ficti
    ASA List of Mentors Catherine Bateson Location: Melbourne, Victoria Preferred genres: children’s fiction, young adult fiction, poetry Preferred method of contact: email and Skype. Catherine Bateson writes verse novels, fiction and poetry for children, young adults and adults. She has been published by UQP, Omnibus, Woolshed Press (Random House), A&U, and John Leonard Press. Her work has received numerous awards and short listings, including the Queensland Premier’s Children’s Book of the Year and CBCA Book of the Year. Catherine teaches professional writing and editing at Federation Training and The Literature Centre, Fremantle, and is also a partner in the Publishing and Editing services business, Tyle & Bateson. She has a BA with a double major in Art History, a B.Litt in Literary Studies and a Grad Dip in Creative Arts. Laura Bloom Location: Bryon Bay, NSW Preferred genres: fiction, young adult literature, graphic novels Preferred method of contact: phone, Skype and email. Laura Bloom is a writer of fiction and young adult fiction. Her novels have been published by Allen & Unwin, Penguin and Pan Macmillan in Australia, and in the USA, Canada and France. Her latest novel, The Cleanskin has just been released by The Author People and is available worldwide. Her work has been shortlisted for the NSW Premier’s Awards and the ABC Fiction Prize, and her YA novel, Augustine’s Lunch, was runner up in the Young Australian Readers’ Awards. Laura has a BA, Communications, from the University of Technology, Sydney. She lives in a small town near Byron Bay with her family.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Secular State in Australia
    CAROLYN EVANS Religion and the Secular State in Australia I. SOCIAL CONTEXT Australia is a predominantly Christian country, however, in recent years there has been a strong growth in groups that describe themselves as not having a religion and in religious minorities including Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists. At the 2006 census date, Christians represented 63.9 percent of the population, non-Christian believers represented 6.2 percent (corresponding to over 120 different religious denominations of 250 or more followers), and the remaining 30 percent either stated that they had no religion or declined to state their religion. Forty-four and one-half percent of the Australian population reported that their religion was either Anglican or Catholic, whilst the largest non- Christian religion represented was Buddhism, with 2.1 percent of the population.1 II. THEORETICAL AND SCHOLARLY CONTEXT Australia became a federated nation in 1901 with the coming into effect of the Australian Constitution. Since that time (and indeed for most of the period of white colonization), Australia has been a broadly secular State with Christian influences on law and politics. Section 116 of the Constitution (discussed further below) prohibits the Commonwealth level of government from establishing a religion and, despite no equivalent existing in most State constitutions, no State government has an established religion or is likely to do so. Nevertheless, Christianity remains the dominant religion and elements of Australia’s Christian heritage can be seen in areas such as the reciting of Christian prayers at the opening of parliament2 and the maintenance of Sunday as the most common day of rest.3 Australia is not a particularly religious country compared to many and religion has rarely played a critical role in public life or debates.
    [Show full text]
  • As Time Goes by a Speech Delivered by the Hon T E F Hughes AO QC to the Justices of the Supreme Court at the Opening of the 2006 Law Term
    LEGAL HISTORY As time goes by A speech delivered by the Hon T E F Hughes AO QC to the justices of the Supreme Court at the opening of the 2006 law term. Chief justice, you have asked me to of Appeal was established in 1966, Jack Slattery, his associate, (this was my speak about judges of this court before he was offended by the figurative first meeting with him) conducted me whom I have appeared. I am honoured separation of sheep and goats that the into the interview room. Any tendency by the invitation and thank you for it. new system entailed. He was not alone. on my part to be overawed by the I have decided that I must observe some There was a substantial schism which occasion was dispelled by the cordiality self-imposed ground-rules. They are: took time to heal. Some of the non- of the interviewers. anointed were heard to refer to a ◆ (with two exceptions) to say nothing However, cordiality to strangers was not particular member of the anointed as about the living; and a characteristic of Sir Frederick. He did ‘King Rat’. But Macfarlan was not given not exude warmth or geniality in ◆ to disregard the injunction de mortuis to name-calling. public; he was known as Frigidaire nihil nisi bonum so far as may be I had but one conversation with Jordan. Freddy; he could be mordant, as when necessary in the interests of candour. It was not a forensic occasion. At the in giving judgement in a divorce appeal, To look back 57 years, to 11 February end of the Second World War, I applied he described the respondent and co- 1949, the date of my admission to the unsuccessfully for one of two Rhodes respondent as having committed Bar, is a long retrospect.
    [Show full text]