DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin 55A, Peats and Their Utilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin 55A, Peats and Their Utilization The Peats of New Jersey And Their Utilization by . SEL_AN A. WAKS_AN ... DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHAgLESP. WILBUR,Director and Chief of the Division of Forests and Parks M_m_DI_HE. JOHNSON,Chief of the Division of Geology and Topography IN cooP_;_'rIoN WITH AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY WILLIA_ H. MARTIN, Director Trenton, N. J. 1942 NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY r: ¸ . i The Peats of New Jersey And Their .Utilization PART A -- NATURE AND ORIGIN 'OF PEAT. COMPOSITION AND UTILIZATION., by SELMAN A. WAKSMAN Soil Microbiologist, N. J. Agricultural Experiment Station "Muck is the mother of the meal chest"- Old Scottish saying, quoted from Browne. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN COOPERATION WITH THE NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT State House Anne_, Trenton, N. J. GEN, HENRY L, M_OELLER, Preside_zt ................... Millburn ARTHUR J. COL_,JNS.............................. Moorestown WlLIJA,',_ C, Covl_ ................................. Glen Ridge HARRYA. DERBY................................... Montctair MAR'tINJ. HOGENCA_I".............................. Paterson W. STEWARTHOLLINGSHEAI).......................... Riverton CI_ARLESA, MEYER.................................. Andover OWEN W_STON ................... Mendham (P. 0. Gladstone) (2) NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL March 30, 1942. MR. C_aRLES P. W1L_g, Director, Department of Conservation and Development, Trenton, N. J. SIR : Although given little publicity, the peat deposits of New Jersey constitute an important natu/'al resource. The domestic demand for this type of material is normally supplied in large part from Germany and Scandinavia, but since those sources have been cut off there has been renewed interest in our local peat deposits. The report on.peat written by Dr. Selman A. Waksman of the New Jersey Agrlcu]tural Experiment Station is therefore of timely aid in meeting the demand for detailed information _which has arisen concerning these deposits. Part A, which follows, is a general description of the nature and origin o_ peat. Part B is now in preparation and will contain detailed descriptions o[ all the larger peat deposits and many of the smaller ones. It gives me pleasure to acknowledge the generous cooperation of the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station in making" this report available for publication as a bulletin in the Geologic Series of this Department's publicatiotls. , Respectfully yours, MEREDITH E. JOHNSON, State Geologist. (3) t NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE ORIGIN OF PEAT When spring displaye4_ her quickening powers Up sprung aquatic p]ants and flowers, So thick, the sun could scarcely trace His image in the liquid glass. Rearing its brilliant head between Broad floating leaves of glossy green The yellow water lily swum Upon the surface of the scum. Like serried groves of hostile spears Tbe reeds uprais'd admidst the racers Their pointed heads of dusky brown By every passing breeze bow'd down. There'rose the waterflag which decks Its golden leaf with purple specks, And water plantain to the _iew Appearing like the plctur'd yew. The bulrush overlooldd the rest With pollsh'd shaft and knotted crest And many more which to describe Would puzzle half the slmpling tribe, Which when drear autumn nlpt tbeii" bloom Sunk down into the watery tomb. ZU-I_'_;. WILLIAM HARRIS02*I, The Fen Poet. Cited by Miller and Skertchly. (4) NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PEATS_AND THEIR UTILIZATION PART A. NATURE AND ORIGIN OF PEAT. COMPOSITION AND UTILIZATION, SEL_AN A. WA_S_AN New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers University PREFACE TO PART A 1 Despite numerous books that have been written, in many languages, which deal with peat and despite the many scientific and agricultural societies in different countries dedicated to peat, this subject has received but limited consideration in this country. Very little atten- tion is being paid to peat as a whole, and even in those scientific institutions where peat is receiving much consideration, as in the Florida, Michigan and Minnesota Experiment Stations, and iri the Soils Division of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, attention is devoted primarily to the agricultural utilization of the peat. Just a century ago (1842) Samuel L. Dana, the brilliant American agricultural chemist, published "A Muck Manual for Farmers," in which he elucidated the nature and utilization of peat. His ideas concerning the function of peat in plant nutrition, however, were rather limited. Under the influence of the great European chemists , Berzelius and Mulder, Dana considered the organic constituents of peat and soil as the most important plant nutrients. "Geine," a term applied to the organic matter of the soil, was said to be "as essential to plants as is food to animals .... geine is the food of plants." With the advance of our knowledge of soil processes and plant nutrition, resulting largely from the work of Boussingault in France, Lawes and Gilbert in England, and Liebig in Germany, the humus concept of plant nutrition was gradually replaced by the mineral theory. One of the outstanding representatives of this school in 1 Assistance in the preparation of this material was furnished by the personnel of Work Projects Administration, Official Proiect No. OP 6S-1-22-477. (5) NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 6 PEAT America, Samuel W. Johnson, in 1859 published a series of lectures on peat and muck, in which he emphasized the potential value of peat for agriculture, not as a direct but as an indirect nutrient for plants, namely, as a source of nitrogen and as an agent for improving physical and chemical soil properties. The major interest in peat was centered, at that time, however, upon its use as a fuel. This can be illustrated by the work of Hyde in 1866 (137) and of Leavitt in 1867 (170), followed by the monu- mental work of Shaler (266-269), as well as by numerous scientific and agricultural papers published in journals and by the various agricultural experiment stations, the U. S. Department of Agricul- ture, and the U. S. Bureau of Mines. In New Jersey, for example, the interest in peat dates back more than a century (253). Despite these studies, the utilization of peat did not make much progress in this direction, because the rapid and extensive use of coal and later of .oil, as well as the large deposits of these materials available in this country, made the use of peat as a fuel superfluous. The latest and perhaps the most complete discussion of peat in the United States, from this point of view, is that of Soper and Osbon (279), published in 1922. It gradually became recoguized that the most important uses to be made of peat in this country are for plant growth and for soil improvement. The present work consists of two parts: Part A comprises a gen- eral survey of the nature and origin of peat ; part B, a survey of the peat resources of New Jersey, carried out with funds supplied by the Work Projects Administration. Part A was prepared entirely by the writer with a certain amount of technical assistance from some of the workers on the W.P:A. project. The contribution made by the members of this proiect to part B ,will be listed in detail in the preface to that part. Opportunity is taken here to express appreciation to the W. P. A. administration of New Jersey, for assistance in the preparation of this monograph, and to the various members of the staff connected with this project, especially to Mr. C. A. ttickman and Miss A. Sadfler, for the preparation of the photographs and sketches. The author also wishes to express his appreciation to Herminie B. Kitchen for her painstaking work in the editing of this manuscript. SELIM[AN A, _VrAKS_AN, NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTENTS PART A. NATURE AND ORIGIN OF PEAT. COMPOSITION AND UTILIZATION. I PAGg Introductory, The nature of peat, its formation and abundance .......... 1_ Chapter ]. Terminology of peat and causes of confusion ............. 16 Chapter If. Types of peat and systems of classification ............... 25 Chapter IIL Climatological, geological and botanical factors involved in peat formation ....................................... 41 Chapter IV. Chemical composition of peats .......................... 57 Chapter V. Physical and physico-cbemical properties of peats aud peat soils ................................................ 80 Chapter VI. Mierobiolcgy of peats. Peat formati6n and decomposition. Peat subsidence .................................... 90 Chapter VII. Utilization of peat for agricultural I_urposes ............. 103 Chapter VIII. Industrial utilization of peat ............................ t31 Bibliography ......................................................... 140 (7) NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ILLUSTRATIONS PAG_ Fig. 1. Eight representative profiles from European and American peat hogs: I-IV, Swedish profiles (221); V, Maine profile (309a); VI-VIII, New Jersey profiles ................................ 19 2. Lowmoor beg (Echo Lake) in New Jersey ................... 27 3. Forest peats in New Jersey: (a) Ongs Hat cedar swamp; (b) Sleeper Creek bog ....................................... 28 4. Floating mat of peat, Budd Lake, N. J ........................ 31 5. Tidal marshes in New Jersey: (a) Bridgeton marsh; (b) Rari- tan River marsh ............................................ 32 6. Effect of tidal marsh on cedar forest, Secaucus,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE ERICACEAE (Heath Family) A family of about 107 genera and 3400 species, primarily shrubs, small trees, and subshrubs, nearly cosmopolitan. The Ericaceae is very important in our area, with a great diversity of genera and species, many of them rather narrowly endemic. Our area is one of the north temperate centers of diversity for the Ericaceae. Along with Quercus and Pinus, various members of this family are dominant in much of our landscape. References: Kron et al. (2002); Wood (1961); Judd & Kron (1993); Kron & Chase (1993); Luteyn et al. (1996)=L; Dorr & Barrie (1993); Cullings & Hileman (1997). Main Key, for use with flowering or fruiting material 1 Plant an herb, subshrub, or sprawling shrub, not clonal by underground rhizomes (except Gaultheria procumbens and Epigaea repens), rarely more than 3 dm tall; plants mycotrophic or hemi-mycotrophic (except Epigaea, Gaultheria, and Arctostaphylos). 2 Plants without chlorophyll (fully mycotrophic); stems fleshy; leaves represented by bract-like scales, white or variously colored, but not green; pollen grains single; [subfamily Monotropoideae; section Monotropeae]. 3 Petals united; fruit nodding, a berry; flower and fruit several per stem . Monotropsis 3 Petals separate; fruit erect, a capsule; flower and fruit 1-several per stem. 4 Flowers few to many, racemose; stem pubescent, at least in the inflorescence; plant yellow, orange, or red when fresh, aging or drying dark brown ...............................................Hypopitys 4 Flower solitary; stem glabrous; plant white (rarely pink) when fresh, aging or drying black . Monotropa 2 Plants with chlorophyll (hemi-mycotrophic or autotrophic); stems woody; leaves present and well-developed, green; pollen grains in tetrads (single in Orthilia).
    [Show full text]
  • Gaylussacia Vaccinium
    Contents Table des matières The Canadian Botanical The first Recipient of the 2005 Undergraduate Botanical Association Bulletin Presentation Regional Award / Première remise d’un prix régional pour la meilleure communication étudiante de premier cycle page 13 Bulletin de l’Association Editor’s Message / Message du rédacteur page 14 botanique du Canada May/ Mai 200 5 • Volume 38 No. / No 2 The first Recipient of the 2005 Undergraduate Botanical PhD Opportunities page 14 Presentation Regional Award Jessie Carviel, student at McMaster University, received this CBA award for the best student paper presented at the 2005 Biology Day in Sudbury, ON, Canada. Paper / Article Miss Carviel is representing the Ontario Region for this contest. The Undergraduate Botanical Presentation Award was created in 2003 by the CBA to encourage undergraduate students to pursue graduate research in botany and to enhance the visibility of the Association. The program offers annually one award of $200.00 for one of the undergraduate conferences/meetings in Biology for each of the five (5) regions of Canada: Atlantic region, Qué bec, Ontario, Prairies and Territories, and British Columbia. Première remise d’un prix ré gional pour la meilleure Poorly Known Economic communicationé tudiante de premier cycle Plants of Canada - 45. Eastern huckleberries Jessie Carviel, étudiante à l’université McMaster, a reçu ce prix de l’ABC pour (Gaylussacia spp.) une présentation faite lors de la Journée de biologie 2005 qui s’est déroulée à and western huckleberries Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. (Vaccinium spp.). E. Small and P.M. Catling Le prix de la meilleure communication étudiante de premier cycle a été créé en pages 15-23 2003 par l’ABC pour inciter les étudiant(e)s à poursuivre leurs études en botanique et pour améliorer la visibilité de l'Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist
    I -1 Lyonia Preserve Plant Checklist Volusia County, Florida I, I Aceraceae (Maple) Asteraceae (Aster) Red Maple Acer rubrum • Bitterweed Helenium amarum • Blackroot Pterocaulon virgatum Agavaceae (Yucca) Blazing Star Liatris sp. B Adam's Needle Yucca filamentosa Blazing Star Liatris tenuifolia BNolina Nolina brittoniana Camphorweed Heterotheca subaxillaris Spanish Bayonet Yucca aloifolia § Cudweed Gnaphalium falcatum • Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium Amaranthaceae (Amaranth) Dwarf Horseweed Conyza candensis B Cottonweed Froelichia floridana False Dandelion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus • Fireweed Erechtites hieracifolia B Anacardiaceae (Cashew) Garberia Garberia heterophylla Winged Sumac Rhus copallina Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia • § Goldenrod Solidago chapmanii Annonaceae (Custard Apple) Goldenrod Solidago fistulosa Flag Paw paw Asimina obovata Goldenrod Solidago spp. B • Mohr's Throughwort Eupatorium mohrii Apiaceae (Celery) BRa gweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia • Dollarweed Hydrocotyle sp. Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia BSpanish Needles Bidens alba Apocynaceae (Dogbane) Wild Lettuce Lactuca graminifolia Periwinkle Catharathus roseus • • Brassicaceae (Mustard) Aquifoliaceae (Holly) Poorman's Pepper Lepidium virginicum Gallberry Ilex glabra • Sand Holly Ilex ambigua Bromeliaceae (Airplant) § Scrub Holly Ilex opaca var. arenicola Ball Moss Tillandsia recurvata • Spanish Moss Tillandsia usneoides Arecaceae (Palm) • Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens Cactaceae (Cactus) BScrub Palmetto Sabal etonia • Prickly Pear Opuntia humifusa Asclepiadaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Overstory Structure and Fire Regime Upon Diversity And
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 49, 2003 (9): 395–402 Effects of overstory structure and fire regime upon diversity and abundance of selected understory species in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) forests in southeastern Georgia W. KEITH MOSER, CHUI KWAN YU Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: We examined the impacts of variation in overstory structure and burning regime on understory vegetation in the longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) forest of the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge in southeastern Georgia, U.S.A. On sandy upland sites surrounding the Okefenokee Swamp and on islands, we established five randomly-located 0.04-ha plots within each of six study areas. The plots varied in overstory density, past management and fire regime. We measured overstory tree size of longleaf pines in the 0.04-ha plots and percent cover of ground cover species in five 1-m2 subplots nested within each 0.04-ha plot. We also calculated diversity indices for the ground cover species. There was no significant relationship between overstory basal area and any diversity measure. Even at the subplot level, there was no significant relationship observed between the diversity measures and distance to the nearest tree, presumably a surrogate for overstory density. The diameter (DBH) of the nearest tree exhibited a slight influence over the Shannon Index, and the nearest tree’s height was significantly related to evenness in each subplot. There were varied relationships between individual species and fire regime or nearest tree measurements. There was a definite, but statistically insignificant, trend of decreasing diversity with increasing years since the last burn.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Pinelands Plants for the Landscape (Revised May 6, 2008)
    Native Pinelands Plants for the Landscape (revised May 6, 2008) New Jersey Pinelands Commission phone: 609-894-7300 P.O. Box 7, New Lisbon, NJ 08064 fax: 609-894-7330 John C. Stokes, Executive Director www.nj.gov/pinelands The Pinelands Commission thanks botanist Joseph R. Arsenault of Franklinville, NJ for his permission to use the following list. The following list suggests common Pine Barrens plants and their uses for landscaping, habitat enhancement and forest restoration. These general uses include: • Buffers are used to separate land uses or property; • Specimen plants are used as a display for form, color or function; • Forest uses are specified for reclamation replanting projects, large and small scale; • Reclamation uses are directed towards cleared land: mines, farming; • Canopy reflects trees with potential to become large and tall; and • Foundation, shade, flowers or other plantings include canopy and smaller species. Species Common Name General Use Comments Trees: Evergreens Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic White Cedar Buffer, specimen, forest Juniperus virginiana Red cedar Buffer, specimen, reclamation Pinus echinata Short-leaf pine Canopy, forest Pinus rigida Pitch pine Canopy, buffer, reclamation Pinus virginiana Virginia Pine Buffer, specimen, reclamation Trees: Deciduous Acer rubrum v. triloba Trident red maple Specimen, shade, wetland Betula lenta Black birch Specimen, shade, wetland Betula lutea Yellow birch Specimen, wetland Betula populifolia Gray birch Specimen Carya pallida Sand hickory Specimen, shade, wildlife
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4.3.3-A1 Upland Plant Species
    All Aboard Florida Draft Environmental Impact Statement Appendix 4.3.3-A1 Upland Plant Species Table 4-X Common Upland Plant Species – Herbaceous (Dry Prairie) Community Scientific Name Common Name Andropogon spp Bluegrass Aristida spiciformis Bottlebrush threeawn Aristida stricta var. beyrichiana Wiregrass Asimina spp Pawpaw Dichanthelium spp Witchgrass Euthamia caroliniana Flattop goldenrod Gaylussacia dumosa Dwarf huckleberry Hypericum tenuifolium Atlantic St. John’s wort Ilex glabra gallberry Lyonia spp Fetterbush Myrica cerifera Wax myrtle Panicum spp Panic grass Pityopsis graminifolia Narrowleaf silkgrass Polygala spp Milkwort Quercus minima Dwarf live oak Serenoa repens Saw palmetto Solidago spp goldenrod Sorghastrum secundum Lopsided indiangrass Vaccinium myrsinites Shiny blueberry Table 4-X Common Upland Plant Species – Shrub and Brushland Community Scientific Name Common Name Baccharis spp. False willow Cocoloba uvifera Sea grape Ilex glabra gallberry Appendix 4.3.3X 1 October x, 2013 Draft All Aboard Florida Draft Environmental Impact Statement Myrica cerifera Wax myrtle Quercus geminata Sand live oak Schinus terebintefolia Brazilian pepper Serenoa repens Saw palmetto Table 4-X Common Upland Plant Species – Coastal Scrub Community Scientific Name Common Name Caesalpinia bonduc Gray knicker Cocoloba uvifera Sea grape Dalbergia ecastaphyllum Coinvine Eugenia foetida Spanish stopper Ilex glabra gallberry Ipomea pes-caprae ssp. brasiliensis Railroad vine Lantana involucrata Buttonsage Myrica cerifera Wax myrtle Paspalum vaginatus Seashore paspalum Quercus geminata Sand live oak Randia aculeata White indigoberry Rapanea punctata Myrsine Serenoa repens Saw palmetto Sporobolus domingensis Coral dropseed Uniola paniculata Seaoats Yucca gloriosa Spanish bayonet Zanthoxylum fagara Wild lime Table 4-X Common Upland Plant Species – Pine Flatwoods Community Scientific Name Common Name Andropogon spp bluegrass Aristida stricta var.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve and Fort Caroline National Memorial, 2009
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve and Fort Caroline National Memorial, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/249 ON THE COVER Partridge berry or squawvine (Mitchella repens) Photograph by Sarah L. Corbett at Theodore Roosevelt Area of Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, June 2009. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve and Fort Caroline National Memorial, 2009 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/249 Michael W. Byrne and Sarah L. Corbett USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 and Joseph C. DeVivo USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network University of Georgia 160 Phoenix Road, Phillips Lab Athens, Georgia, 30605 February 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericaceae Ericaceae Durande – the Heath Family
    FLORA OF NEW JERSEY PROJECT APPROVED NOMENCLATURE FNJP Authority Name: Walter Bien, PH.D May 2009 New Jersey’s Ericaceae Ericaceae Durande – The Heath Family Found worldwide but rare in lowland tropics. 126 genera, 3995 species; in New Jersey, there are 20 genera and 42 species. ( # = species, letters = varieties; Roman Numerals = synonyms as indented) 1. Andromeda polifolia var. glaucophylla (Link) DC. - Bog Rosemary i. Andromeda glaucophylla Link 2. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. - Bearberry a. Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. var. coactilis Fernald & J.F.Macbr. 3. Calluna vulgaris ( L.) Hull - Heather (Non-native) 4. Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench - Leatherleaf i. Andromeda calyculata L. 5. Chimaphila maculata (L.) Pursh- Spotted Wintergreen (USDA lists as Pyrolaceae) i. Pyrola maculata L. 6. Chimaphila umbellata ( L.) W. Bartram – Pipsissewa (USDA lists as Pyrolaceae) i. Pyrola umbellata L. THE FLORA OF NEW JERSEY PROJECT IS A VOLUNTEER EFFORT AIMED AT THE PRODUCTION OF A MANUAL TO THE VASCULAR FLORA OF NEW JERSEY. ii. Chimaphila umbellata (L.) W. Bartram ssp. cisatlantica (S.F. Blake) Hultén 7. Corema conradii (Torr.) Torr. ex Louden - Broom Crowberry a. (IPNI and USDA list as Empetraceae) 8. Epigaea repens L. - Trailing Arbutus i. Epigaea repens var. glabrifolia Fernald 9. Erica tetralix L. - Cross-leaved Heather (Non-native) 10. Eubotrys racemosa (L.) Nutt. (= Leucothoë racemosa) – Fetterbush i. Leucothoë racemosa (L.) A. Gray ii. Leucothoë racemosa var. elongata (Small) Fernald 11. Gaultheria hispidula (L.) Muhl. ex Bigelow - Creeping Snowberry 12. Gaultheria procumbens L. – Wintergreen 13. Gaylussacia baccata K.Koch - Black Huckleberry i. Gaylussacia baccata var. glaucocarpa Mack. ii. Gaylussacia baccata f. leucocarpa Fernald 14.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Alexandria Plant Lists and Canopy Coverage Allowances Trees
    3/1/2019 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA PLANT LISTS AND CANOPY COVERAGE ALLOWANCES TREES Locally Regionally Eastern U.S. Not Botanical Name Common Name CCA (SF) Notes Native Native Native Recommended Abies balsamea Balsam Fir X X 500 Acer leucoderme Chalk Maple X 1250 Acer negundo Boxelder X X X 1250 Acer nigrum Black Sugar Maple X X 1250 Acer pensylvanicum Striped Maple X X 500 Acer rubrum Red maple X X X 1250 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple X X X X Plant has maintenance issues. Acer saccharum Sugar maple X X 1250 Acer spicatum Mountain Maple X X 500 Aesculus flava Yellow Buckeye X X 750 Aesculus glabra Ohio Buckeye X X 1250 Aesculus pavia Red Buckeye X 500 Alnus incana Gray Alder X X 750 Alnus maritima Seaside Alder X X 500 Amelanchier arborea Downy Serviceberry X X X 500 Amelanchier canadensis Canadian Serviceberry X X X 500 Amelanchier laevis Smooth Serviceberry X X X 750 Asimina triloba Pawpaw X X X 750 Betula populifolia Gray Birch X 500 Betula alleghaniensis Yellow Birch X X 750 Betula lenta Black (Sweet) birch X X 750 Betula nigra River birch X X X 750 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch X X X Northern/mountain adapted. Carpinua betulus European Hornbeam 250 Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam X X X 500 Carya cordiformis Bitternut Hickory X X X 1250 Carya glabra Pignut Hickory X X X 750 Carya illinoinensis Pecan X 1250 Carya laciniosa Shellbark Hickory X X 1250 Carya ovata Shagbark Hickory X X 500 Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory X X X 750 Castanea dentata American Chestnut X X X X Not yet recommended due to Blight Catalpa bignonioides Southern Catalpa X X 1250 Catalpa speciosa Northern Catalpa X X Plant is aggressive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericaceae – Heath Family
    ERICACEAE – HEATH FAMILY Plant: mostly shrubs, fewer trees, rarely perennial herbs, some epiphytes Stem: Root: Leaves: sometimes evergreen, simple, small (sometimes just scales) and often elliptical in shape, often thick or firm, usually alternate (sometimes opposite); no stipules Flowers: perfect, mostly regular (actinomorphic); small to large and showy, solitary or in spikes; 4-5(7-8) sepals; 4-5(7-8) petals (rarely none), often bell- or funnel-shaped and lobed; 8-10 stamens, usually 2X of petals; ovary superior or inferior, carpels 4-10 or rarely fewer,1 style Fruit: capsule, berry or drupe; 5 to numerous seeds Other: very widespread and varied family; includes huckleberries, blueberries, cranberries, rhododendrons, laurels, etc.; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 100+ genera, those present here – Gaultheria; Vaccinium and others WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the Ericaceae A diverse group – both flower and fruit (Heath Family) are sometimes necessary for a good ID Examples of some common genera Lowbush Blueberry Wintergreen [Mountain-Tea; Eastern Teaberry] Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton Small Cranberry Gaultheria procumbens L. Vaccinium oxycoccos L. [Black] Huckleberry Farkleberry [Highbush Blueberry; Sparkleberry] Gaylussacia baccata (Wangenh.) K. Koch Vaccinium arboreum Marsh. Early [Wild] Azalea Rhododendron prinophyllum (Small) Millais (R. roseum (Loisel.) Rehd.) ERICACEAE – HEATH FAMILY Kinnikinnick [Alpine Bearberry]; Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. Leatherleaf; Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench Wintergreen [Mountain-Tea; Eastern Teaberry]; Gaultheria procumbens L. [Black] Huckleberry; Gaylussacia baccata (Wangenh.) K. Koch Dwarf Huckleberry; Gaylussacia dumosa (Andrews) Torr. & A. Gray Rusty Staggerbush [Rusty Lyonia]; Lyonia ferruginea (Walter) Nutt. Great [Rosebay] Rhododendron [Laurel]; Rhododendron maximum L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwarf Huckleberry (Gaylussacia Dumosa)
    Dwarf huckleberry (Gaylussacia dumosa) For definitions of botanical terms, visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_botanical_terms. Dwarf huckleberry is a low-growing colonial shrub found in pine savannas, flatwoods, sandhills and scrub throughout much of Florida. The plant is a larval host for the woodland elfin butterfly. Its spring flowers are attractive to pollinators, especially native and honey bees, and its juicy summer fruits are a delight for birds, small mammals and humans! Try them raw or make them into a jam or pie filling. Dwarf huckleberry’s small white to pinkish-white flowers are five-lobed, urn- or bell-shaped and cupped in soft yellowish-green sepals. They are born in clusters of five to eight on terminal racemes. Leaves are leathery, green and Photo by Mary Keim elliptic to ovate with pointed apices. They are alternately arranged. Leaf undersides are glandular with microscopic yellowish resin dots. Leaf margins are entire and pubescent. The leaves turn red in the fall. Young branches are covered in small curly hairs. Bark on mature branches is grayish-brown and flaky. Fruits are shiny, pubescent purplish-black drupes. Each bear 10 nutlets; each nutlet bears a single seed. Dwarf huckleberry is often mistaken for its cousins, Darrow’s blueberry (Vaccinium darrowii) and Shiny blueberry (V. myrsinites). To distinguish them, look for the yellowish resin dots on leaf undersides — they are absent from the Vaccinium species. The genus Gaylussacia is named for French chemist Louis Joseph Gay-Lussac (1778–1850), who served as the chair of chemistry at France’s main botanical garden, the Jardin des plantes.
    [Show full text]