Nicholas Square Apartments Project As Detailed Below

COMBINED NOTICE Notice to Public of No Significant Effect on the Environment And Notice to Public of Request for Release of Funds

June 9, 2021

Kentucky Housing Corporation 1231 Louisville Road Frankfort, KY 40601

These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by Kentucky Housing Corporation.

TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS, AND PERSONS:

REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS

On or about June 25, 2021, Kentucky Housing Corporation (KHC) will submit a request to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the release of HUD HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program funds to undertake a project known as Nicholas Square Apartments Project as detailed below.

Project Title: Nicholas Square Apartments Project Location: 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) Purpose of Project: The project consists of the rehabilitation of a 36-unit multifamily complex of which consists of (7) two-story residential buildings an office, community room and laundry room. Project Cost: $500,000 in HOME funds and $4,200,890 in non-HUD funding for a total project cost of $4,700,890 Applicant/Recipient Agency: Winterwood Development/Nicholas Place LLC - 1390 Olivia Lane, Suite 100, Lexington, KY 40511

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

KHC has determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental Review Record (ERR) on file at www.winterwoodonline.com and https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/ environmental-review/environmental-review-records or at the office of Winterwood Development at 1390 Olivia Lane, Suite 100 Lexington, KY 40511 and is available for public examination and copying, upon request, between the hours of 9A.M. and 4 P.M.

1 PUBLIC COMMENTS

Any individual, group, or agency disagreeing with this determination or wishing to comment on the project may submit written comments to KHC, Attn. Jeremy Ratliff, at the address at the top of this notice. All comments received by June 24, 2021 will be considered by KHC prior to authorizing submission of a request for release of funds. Comments should specify which notice they are addressing.

ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION

The Kentucky Housing Corporation certifies to HUD that Jeremy Ratliff in his capacity as General Counsel/Deputy Executive Director Legal & Compliance consents to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the environmental review process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD’s approval of the certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities and allows KHC to use Program funds.

OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS

HUD will accept objections to its release of funds and KHC’s certification for a period of 15 days following the anticipated submission date, or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later), only if they are on one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of KHC; (b) KHC has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 58; (c) the grant recipient has committed funds or incurred costs not authorized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD/state; or (d) another federal agency acting pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Part 58) and shall be addressed to the HUD Louisville Field Office at CPD_COVID-19OEE- [email protected] Potential objectors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection period.

Jeremy Ratliff, General Counsel/Deputy Executive Director Legal &Compliance

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #1 PROJECT LOCATION MAPS & PHOTOS

EXHIBIT #2 AIRPORT HAZARDS

EXHIBIT #3 FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP

EXHIBIT #4 PHASE ONE ESA

EXHIBIT #5 ENDANGERED SPECIES – NOT APPLICABLE

EXHIBIT #6 EXPLOSIVE & FLAMMABLE HAZARDS - ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANK – NOT APPLICABLE

EXHIBIT #7 USDA FARMLAND – NOT APPLICABLE

EXHIBIT #8 KENTUCKY HERITAGE COUNCIL’S SHPO & TRIBAL CONSULTATION CHECKLIST

EXHIBIT #9 NOISE DOCUMENTATION: ROADWAYS, RAILROADS & AIRPORTS

EXHIBIT #10 SOLE SOURCE AQUIFERS, WETLANDS MAP & WILD RIVER MANAGEMENT MAPS

EXHIBIT #11 PUBLIC NOTICE

EXHIBIT #12 CLEARINGHOUSE COMMENTS & ZONING APPROVAL & PART II ESA CHECKLIST DOCUMENTATION

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #1

PROJECT LOCATION MAPS

PHOTOS

Aerial Map

Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) Site Photos - Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736)

Site Photos - Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736)

CARLISLE, KENTUCKY 40311 KENTUCKY CARLISLE,

kerseyandkersey.com

O I

227 E NORTH ST NORTH E 227

Fax 812 873 1487 873 812 Fax 2728 585 502 Fax

U Tel 812 873 1287 873 812 Tel 0094 583 502 Tel

SITE PLAN

Commiskey, IN 47227 IN Commiskey, 40204 KY Louisville,

9307 West 1000 North 1000 West 9307 Street Gray East 839 S

NICHOLAS SQUARE NICHOLAS

2054 N

O A200 NOT FOR NOT C

2020 Kersey & Kersey, 2020 & Kersey, Kersey Inc. PRELIMINA

N.T.S.

T R

R O N

A E 1 VICINITY MAP VICINITY

U A200 SITE

A 1" 30'-0" = L SITE SITE PLAN O

C I

N FENCE CURB

CURB

K G K

A A

W W

R GAZEBO

OFFICE / OFFICE

LAUNDRY A

I I

S S BLDG. 300 PAD

E DUMPSTER

E N

K N

L L I

E W

E R CURB

I D Y

F S

N R

P BLDG. 400

BLDG. 200

K M AL EW U ID G S IN S RK PA S

CURB CURB

FENCE

PAD E

DUMPSTER

U S

BLDG. 500

L I

F P

BLDG. 600

PAD E

DUMPSTER M

BLDG. BLDG. 700

S A FENCE CURB PARKING

S BLDG. 800BLDG.

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #2

AIRPORT HAZARDS

Airport Radius Map

Project Site

Cynthiana-Harrison County Airport – closest airport located 14.10 miles away

The site is NOT located within 15 miles of a military airfield. Kentucky has only two military airports: Godman Army Airfield, located over 100 miles away at Fort Knox and the Campbell Army Airfield, located almost 200 miles away at Fort Campbell.

Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736)

Distance to the Cynthiana-Harrison County Airport

Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736)

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #3

FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette Legend

84°1'48"W 38°19'12"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT

Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mileZone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to OTHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes.Zone X FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D

NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Effective LOMRs

OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D

GENERAL Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer STRUCTURES Levee, Dike, or Floodwall

20.2 B Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation

8 Coastal Transect Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline OTHER Profile Baseline FEATURES Hydrographic Feature

Digital Data Available

No Digital Data Available MAP PANELS Unmapped Ü

The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location.

This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 5/1/2021 at 8:01 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time.

This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for Feet 1:6,000 84°1'10"W 38°18'44"N unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes. Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #4

PHASE ONE ESA

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #5

ENDANGERED SPECIES CONSULTATION

–

NOT APPLICABLE

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #6

EXPLOSIVE & FLAMMABLE HAZARDS –

ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS

–

NOT APPLICABLE

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #7

USDA FARMLAND

–

NOT APPLICABLE

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #8

KENTUCKY HERITAGE COUNCIL’S SHPO CONSULTATION

TRIBAL CONSULTATION CHECKLIST

ANDY BESHEAR TOURISM, ARTS AND HERITAGE CABINET MICHAEL E. BERRY GOVERNOR SECRETARY KENTUCKY HERITAGE COUNCIL THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE JACQUELINE COLEMAN 410 HIGH STREET CRAIG A. POTTS LT. GOVERNOR FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & (502) 564-7005 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER www.heritage.ky.gov May 18, 2021

Suzie Loveday Loveday Consulting LLC 4421 Rivard Ln. Lexington, KY 40509

Re: Rehab of Nicholas Square Apts., Carlisle, Nicholas Co., KY

Dear Ms. Loveday:

Our review indicates that the proposed project will not impact any properties or sites that are listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The proposed project should not require an archaeological survey or cultural historic survey.

In the event that human remains are encountered during project activities, all work should be immediately stopped in the area. The area should be cordoned off, and in accordance with KRS 72.020 the county coroner and local law enforcement must be contacted immediately. Upon confirmation that the human remains are not of forensic interest, the unanticipated discovery must be reported to the Kentucky Heritage Council.

Should the project plans change, or should additional information become available regarding cultural resources or citizens’ concerns regarding impacts to cultural resources, please submit that information to our office as additional consultation may be warranted. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Nick Laracuente of my staff at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Craig A. Potts, Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Officer

CP:nrl KHC #61444

An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D 15

Appendix A

When To Consult With Tribes Under Section 106

Section 106 requires consultation with federally-recognized Indian tribes when a project may affect a historic property of religious and cultural significance to the tribe. Historic properties of religious and cultural significance include: archeological sites, burial grounds, sacred landscapes or features, ceremonial areas, traditional cultural places, traditional cultural landscapes, plant and animal communities, and buildings and structures with significant tribal association. The types of activities that may affect historic properties of religious and cultural significance include: ground disturbance (digging), new construction in undeveloped natural areas, introduction of incongruent visual, audible, or atmospheric changes, work on a building with significant tribal association, and transfer, lease or sale of properties of the types listed above.

If a project includes any of the types of activities below, invite tribes to consult:

⁯ significant ground disturbance (digging) Examples: new sewer lines, utility lines (above and below ground), foundations, footings, grading, access roads

⁯ new construction in undeveloped natural areas Examples: industrial-scale energy facilities, transmission lines, pipelines, or new recreational facilities, in undeveloped natural areas like mountaintops, canyons, islands, forests, native grasslands, etc., and housing, commercial, and industrial facilities in such areas

⁯ incongruent visual changes Examples: construction of a focal point that is out of character with the surrounding natural area, impairment of the vista or viewshed from an observation point in the natural landscape, or impairment of the recognized historic scenic qualities of an area

⁯ incongruent audible changes Examples: increase in noise levels above an acceptable standard in areas known for their quiet, contemplative experience

⁯ incongruent atmospheric changes Examples: introduction of lights that create skyglow in an area with a dark night sky

⁯ work on a building with significant tribal association Examples: rehabilitation, demolition or removal of a surviving ancient tribal structure or village, or a building or structure that there is reason to believe was the location of a significant tribal event, home of an important person, or that served as a tribal school or community hall

⁯ transfer, lease or sale of a historic property of religious and cultural significance Example: transfer, lease or sale of properties that contain archeological sites, burial grounds, sacred landscapes or features, ceremonial areas, plant and animal communities, or buildings and structures with significant tribal association

⁯ None of the above apply

______Project Reviewed By Date

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #9

NOISE DOCUMENTATION:

ROADWAYS, RAILROADS & AIRPORTS

5/1/2021 National Transportation Noise Map

Mode:Y2Map:ear27 E: 2016ast NDarorthk StreSatelliteet, Ca2018…  View Aviation (), Road (), Rail () Noise in the U.S. for 2016 and 2018

Noise (dBA) 24-hr LAeq

> 90.0 80.0 - 89.9 70.0 - 79.9 60.0 - 69.9 55.0 - 59.9 50.0 - 54.9 45.0 - 49.9 © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap © Maxar |

SOURCES: Map created by the Office of Spatial Analysis and Visualization at the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation. For any edits or corrections to this map, please contact us. https://maps.dot.gov/BTS/NationalTransportationNoiseMap/ 1/1

5/24/2021 DNL Calculator - HUD Exchange

Home (/) > Programs (/programs/) > Environmental Review (/programs/environmental-review/) > DNL Calculator

DNL Calculator The Day/Night Noise Level Calculator is an electronic assessment tool that calculates the Day/Night Noise Level (DNL) from roadway and railway trac. For more information on using the DNL calculator, view the Day/Night Noise Level Calculator Electronic Assessment Tool Overview (/programs/environmental- review/daynight-noise-level-electronic-assessment-tool/).

Guidelines To display the Road and/or Rail DNL calculator(s), click on the "Add Road Source" and/or "Add Rail Source" button(s) below. All Road and Rail input values must be positive non-decimal numbers. All Road and/or Rail DNL value(s) must be calculated separately before calculating the Site DNL. All checkboxes that apply must be checked for vehicles and trains in the tables' headers. Note #1: Tooltips, containing eld specic information, have been added in this tool and may be accessed by hovering over all the respective data elds (site identication, roadway and railway assessment, DNL calculation results, roadway and railway input variables) with the mouse. Note #2: DNL Calculator assumes roadway data is always entered.

DNL Calculator

Site ID Nicholas Place Apts

Record Date 05/24/2021

User's Name S. Loveday

Road # 1 Name: Highway 32

Road #1

Vehicle Type Cars Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks

Eective Distance 421 421 421

Distance to Stop Sign

Average Speed 35 35 35

Average Daily Trips (ADT) 2320 151 39

Night Fraction of ADT 15 15 15

Road Gradient (%) 2

Vehicle DNL 44 42 46

Calculate Road #1 DNL 49 Reset

Railroad #1 Track Identier: Trans KY Transp. Railroad

Rail # 1

Train Type Electric Diesel

Eective Distance 1232

Average Train Speed

https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/dnl-calculator/ 1/2 5/24/2021 DNL Calculator - HUD Exchange

Engines per Train 2

Railway cars per Train 50

Average Train Operations (ATO) 1

Night Fraction of ATO 0

Railway whistles or horns? Yes: No: Yes: No:

Bolted Tracks? Yes: No: Yes: No:

Train DNL 0 38

Calculate Rail #1 DNL 38 Reset

Add Road Source Add Rail Source

Airport Noise Level

Loud Impulse Sounds? Yes No

Combined DNL for all 49 Road and Rail sources

Combined DNL including Airport N/A

Site DNL with Loud Impulse Sound

Calculate Reset

Mitigation Options If your site DNL is in Excess of 65 decibels, your options are:

No Action Alternative: Cancel the project at this location Other Reasonable Alternatives: Choose an alternate site Mitigation Contact your Field or Regional Environmental Ocer (/programs/environmental-review/hud- environmental-sta-contacts/) Increase mitigation in the building walls (only eective if no outdoor, noise sensitive areas) Recongure the site plan to increase the distance between the noise source and noise-sensitive uses Incorporate natural or man-made barriers. See The Noise Guidebook (/resource/313/hud-noise- guidebook/) Construct noise barrier. See the Barrier Performance Module (/programs/environmental- review/bpm-calculator/)

Tools and Guidance Day/Night Noise Level Assessment Tool User Guide (/resource/3822/day-night-noise-level-assessment-tool- user-guide/)

Day/Night Noise Level Assessment Tool Flowcharts (/resource/3823/day-night-noise-level-assessment-tool- owcharts/)

https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/dnl-calculator/ 2/2 5/1/2021 Traffic Counts

Traffic Counts

+  -84.024736, 38.316089   Measurement – Show search results for -84.02…  | Feet

Measurement Result

414.1 Feet ꤆

 Clear 

Esri Community Maps Contributors, Esri, HE App State Click to restore the map extent and layers 660000fffttt visibility where you left off. -84.019 38.314 Degrees Press CTRL to enable snapping https://maps.kytc.ky.gov/trafficcounts/ 1/1 5/1/2021 Traffic Counts

Traffic Counts

+  -84.024736, 38.316089   Info – Show search results for -84.02…  (1 of 2) Clear Zoom to Clear Selected

091-KY-0032 -000

Route 091-KY-0032 -000 ꤆ Beginning Milepoint 9.957 Ending Milepoint 10.703  County Nicholas  Station ID 091A14 Station Type Full Coverage AADT 2,501 Year 2017 Single Truck AADT 123.00 Combo Truck AADT 43.00 % Single Trucks 6.01 % Combo Trucks 1.55 % Peak Trucks Single 0.45 % Peak Trucks Combo 0.04 K Factor 8.20 D Factor 56.00

Esri Community Maps Contributors, Buildin App State Click to restore the map extent and layers 330000fffttt visibility where you left off. -84.017 38.315 Degrees https://maps.kytc.ky.gov/trafficcounts/ 1/1

5/1/2021 KYTC Traffic Count Reporting System

Historical Traffic Volume Summary Station Details: Newest Count: Sta ID: 091A14 Begin MP: 9.9570 AADT: 2501 Sta Type: Full Coverage Begin Desc: KY 36/SOUTH BROADWAY Year: 2017 Map: MapIt End Mp: 10.7030 % Single: 6.0150 District: 9 End Desc: KY 1455 % Combo: 1.5490 County: Nicholas Impact Year: K Factor: 8.20 Route: 091-KY-0032 -000 Year Added: D Factor: 56 Route Desc: N BROADWAY ST+MYERS RD

Definitions: Sta. ID - Three digit county number + station number MP - milepoint Impact Year – year of significant change to traffic pattern within station segment AADT – Annual Average Daily Traffic – the annualized average 24-hour volume of vehicles on a segment of roadway % Single – single unit truck volume as a percentage of the AADT % Combo – combination truck volume as a percentage of the AADT K Factor – peak hour volume as a percentage of the AADT D Factor – percentage of peak hour volume flowing in the peak direction

Year AADT Year AADT Year AADT 2021 2011 2510 2001 2020 2010 2000 2019 2009 1999 2018 2008 2710 1998 2017 2501 2007 1997 2800 2016 2006 1996 2015 2005 2730 1995 2014 2183 2004 1994 2013 2003 1993 2012 2002 3040 1992

https://datamart.kytc.ky.gov/EDSB_SOLUTIONS/CTS/StationDetail.aspx?STATION=091A14&TF_NE_ID=42996716 1/1 5/24/2021 Get Maps | topoView      Location Map Name   4  Search by location   1991   2021

+ All 250K 100K 63K 48K 24K HTMC UST All

4 maps here | Scale: All, Date: 1991-2021, Series: All 133 N Broadway St, Carlisle, KY 40311, United States | Elev: - 923 ft   Filter records  Name Date Scale State Carlisle, KY   2010 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 Carlisle, KY  2013 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 Carlisle, KY  2016 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 Carlisle, KY 2019 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 JPEG (10 MB) GeoTiff (20 MB) KMZ (5 MB) GeoPDF (111 MB)

     

SHOW INFO ZOOM PAN PIN FIX



Lat: 38° 20' 22'' N Long: 83° 58' 22'' W  300 m DMS DD  MGR UTM 1000 ft Scale 1:18,056  Map Records: 8 Leaflet © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap| Improve Partly cloudy, 64° near Carlisle, KY. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/38.3157/-84.0238 1/1 5/24/2021 Get Maps | topoView      Location Map Name   4  38.316089, -84.024736   1991   2021

+ All 250K 100K 63K 48K 24K HTMC UST All

4 maps here | Scale: All, Date: 1991-2021, Series: All 323 N Broadway St, Carlisle, KY 40311, United States | Elev: - 873 ft   Filter records  Name Date Scale State Carlisle, KY   2010 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 JPEG (3 MB) GeoTiff (12 MB)  KMZ (3 MB) GeoPDF (17 MB)        SHOW INFO ZOOM PAN PIN FIX Carlisle, KY 2013 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 Carlisle, KY 2016 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000 Carlisle, KY 2019 (US Topo) Scale 1:24000



Lat: 38° 18' 45'' N Long: 84° 1' 39'' W  500 m DMS DD  MGR UTM 2000 ft Scale 1:36,112  Map Records: 12 Leaflet © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap| Improve Partly cloudy, 64° near Carlisle, KY. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#14/38.3161/-84.0247 1/1 Railroad Distance Map

The closest residential building is located 1,232.58 from the active railroad.

Project Site

Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) 5/1/2021 https://fragis.fra.dot.gov/FRA-PopupViewer/index.html

U.S. Department of Transportation FRA - Crossing Viewer

Search result  

-84.024736 38.316089 Show more results

 Zoom to

Unit Mode

Feet Auto

Distance 1,978.14 ft

200 m New Measurement -84.024736, 38.316089   600 ft

Esri, HERE Powered by Esri https://fragis.fra.dot.gov/FRA-PopupViewer/index.html 1/1 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2130-0017

Instructions for the initial reporting of the following types of new or previously unreported crossings: For public highway-rail grade crossings, complete the entire inventory Form. For private highway-rail grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For public pathway grade crossings (including pedestrian station grade crossings), complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For Private pathway grade crossings, complete the Header, Parts I and II, and the Submission Information section. For grade-separated highway-rail or pathway crossings (including pedestrian station crossings), complete the Header, Part I, and the Submission Information section. For changes to existing data, complete the Header, Part I Items 1-3, and the Submission Information section, in addition to the updated data fields. Note: For private crossings only, Part I Item 20 and Part III Item 2.K. are required unless otherwise noted. An asterisk * denotes an optional field. A. Revision Date B. Reporting Agency C. Reason for Update (Select only one) D. DOT Crossing (MM/DD/YYYY)  Railroad  Transit ✘ Change in  New  Closed  No Train  Quiet Inventory Number _____/_____/______08 13 2019 Data Crossing Traffic Zone Update ✘ State  Other  Re-Open  Date  Change in Primary  Admin. 353932W Change Only Operating RR Correction Part I: Location and Classification Information 1. Primary Operating Railroad 2. State 3. County ______TRANS KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION RAILROAD, INC. [TTIS] ______KENTUCKY ______NICHOLAS 4. City / Municipality 5. Street/Road Name & Block Number 6. Highway Type & No. ✘ In ______E UNION RD | ______ Near ______CARLISLE (Street/Road Name) |* (Block Number) ______KY-1285 7. Do Other Railroads Operate a Separate Track at Crossing?  Yes ✘ No 8. Do Other Railroads Operate Over Your Track at Crossing?  Yes ✘ No If Yes, Specify RR If Yes, Specify RR ______, ______, ______, ______, ______, ______, ______9. Railroad Division or Region 10. Railroad Subdivision or District 11. Branch or Line Name 12. RR Milepost ______M |______0132.08 |______ None ______ None ______CINCINNATI  None ______PM (prefix) | (nnnn.nnn) | (suffix) 13. Line Segment 14. Nearest RR Timetable 15. Parent RR (if applicable) 16. Crossing Owner (if applicable) * Station * ______CARLISLE  N/A ______ N/A ______17. Crossing Type 18. Crossing Purpose 19. Crossing Position 20. Public Access 21. Type of Train 22. Average Passenger ✘ Highway ✘ At Grade (if Private Crossing)  Freight  Transit Train Count Per Day ✘ Public  Pathway, Ped.  RR Under  Yes  Intercity Passenger  Shared Use Transit  Less Than One Per Day  Private  Station, Ped.  RR Over  No  Commuter  Tourist/Other  Number Per Day_____0 23. Type of Land Use  Open Space  Farm ✘ Residential  Commercial  Industrial  Institutional  Recreational  RR Yard 24. Is there an Adjacent Crossing with a Separate Number? 25. Quiet Zone (FRA provided)

 Yes  No If Yes, Provide Crossing Number ______✘ No  24 Hr  Partial  Chicago Excused Date Established ______26. HSR Corridor ID 27. Latitude in decimal degrees 28. Longitude in decimal degrees 29. Lat/Long Source 38.3128910 -84.0210290 ______ N/A (WGS84 std: nn.nnnnnnn) (WGS84 std: -nnn.nnnnnnn) ✘ Actual  Estimated 30.A. Railroad Use * 31.A. State Use *

30.B. Railroad Use * 31.B. State Use *

30.C. Railroad Use * 31.C. State Use *

30.D. Railroad Use * 31.D. State Use *

32.A. Narrative (Railroad Use) * 32.B. Narrative (State Use) * XBCK BK RFL; 1 RR XING SYMBL XBCK BK RFL; 1 RR XING SYMBL 33. Emergency Notification Telephone No. (posted) 34. Railroad Contact (Telephone No.) 35. State Contact (Telephone No.) 859-987-1589 859-987-1589 502-564-3210 ______Part II: Railroad Information 1. Estimated Number of Daily Train Movements 1.A. Total Day Thru Trains 1.B. Total Night Thru Trains 1.C. Total Switching Trains 1.D. Total Transit Trains 1.E. Check if Less Than (6 AM to 6 PM) (6 PM to 6 AM) One Movement Per Day  ______1 ______0 ______0 ______How many trains per week? ______2. Year of Train Count Data (YYYY) 3. Speed of Train at Crossing 3.A. Maximum Timetable Speed (mph) ______10 ______3.B. Typical Speed Range Over Crossing (mph) From ______2 to ______10 4. Type and Count of Tracks

Main ______1 Siding ______Yard ______Transit ______Industry ______5. Train Detection (Main Track only)  Constant Warning Time  Motion Detection AFO  PTC ✘ DC  Other  None 6. Is Track Signaled? 7.A. Event Recorder 7.B. Remote Health Monitoring  Yes ✘ No  Yes  No  Yes  No FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 1 OF 2 U. S. DOT CROSSING INVENTORY FORM

A. Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) D. Crossing Inventory Number (7 char.) 08/13/2019 PAGE 2 353932W Part III: Highway or Pathway Traffic Control Device Information 1. Are there 2. Types of Passive Traffic Control Devices associated with the Crossing Signs or Signals? 2.A. Crossbuck 2.B. STOP Signs (R1-1) 2.C. YIELD Signs (R1-2) 2.D. Advance Warning Signs (Check all that apply; include count)  None Assemblies (count) (count) (count) ✘ W10-1 ______2  W10-3 ______ W10-11 ______✘ Yes  No 2 0 0  W10-2 ______2  W10-4 ______ W10-12 ______2.E. Low Ground Clearance Sign 2.F. Pavement Markings 2.G. Channelization 2.H. EXEMPT Sign 2.I. ENS Sign (I-13) (W10-5) Devices/Medians (R15-3) Displayed  Yes (count______) ✘ Stop Lines Dynamic Envelope  All Approaches  Median  Yes ✘ Yes ✘ No ✘ RR Xing Symbols  None  One Approach ✘ None ✘ No  No 2.J. Other MUTCD Signs ✘ Yes  No 2.K. Private Crossing 2.L. LED Enhanced Signs (List types) Signs (if private) Specify Type ______Count ______2 Specify Type ______Count ______ Yes  No Specify Type ______Count ______3. Types of Train Activated Warning Devices at the Grade Crossing (specify count of each device for all that apply) 3.A. Gate Arms 3.B. Gate Configuration 3.C. Cantilevered (or Bridged) Flashing Light 3.D. Mast Mounted Flashing Lights 3.E. Total Count of (count) Structures (count) (count of masts) ______2 Flashing Light Pairs  2 Quad  Full (Barrier) Over Traffic Lane _____0  Incandescent  Incandescent  LED 0 ✘ Roadway _____  3 Quad Resistance  Back Lights Included  Side Lights 4 Pedestrian _____  4 Quad  Median Gates Not Over Traffic Lane _____0  LED Included

3.F. Installation Date of Current 3.G. Wayside Horn 3.H. Highway Traffic Signals Controlling 3.I. Bells Active Warning Devices: (MM/YYYY) Crossing (count)  Yes Installed on (MM/YYYY) ______/______/______ Not Required  Yes ✘ No 1  No 3.J. Non-Train Active Warning 3.K. Other Flashing Lights or Warning Devices  Flagging/Flagman Manually Operated Signals  Watchman  Floodlighting  None Count ______0 Specify type ______4.A. Does nearby Hwy 4.B. Hwy Traffic Signal 4.C. Hwy Traffic Signal Preemption 5. Highway Traffic Pre-Signals 6. Highway Monitoring Devices Intersection have Interconnection  Yes  No (Check all that apply) Traffic Signals?  Not Interconnected  Yes - Photo/Video Recording  For Traffic Signals  Simultaneous Storage Distance * ______ Yes – Vehicle Presence Detection  Yes ✘ No  For Warning Signs  Advance Stop Line Distance * ______ None Part IV: Physical Characteristics 1. Traffic Lanes Crossing Railroad  One-way Traffic 2. Is Roadway/Pathway 3. Does Track Run Down a Street? 4. Is Crossing Illuminated? (Street ✘ Two-way Traffic Paved? lights within approx. 50 feet from Number of Lanes ______2  Divided Traffic ✘ Yes  No  Yes ✘ No nearest rail) ✘ Yes  No 5. Crossing Surface (on Main Track, multiple types allowed) Installation Date * (MM/YYYY) ______/______Width * ______Length * ______ 1 Timber ✘ 2 Asphalt  3 Asphalt and Timber  4 Concrete  5 Concrete and Rubber  6 Rubber  7 Metal  8 Unconsolidated  9 Composite  10 Other (specify) ______6. Intersecting Roadway within 500 feet? 7. Smallest Crossing Angle 8. Is Commercial Power Available? *

✘ Yes  No If Yes, Approximate Distance (feet) ______200  0° – 29°  30° – 59° ✘ 60° - 90° ✘ Yes  No Part V: Public Highway Information 1. Highway System 2. Functional Classification of Road at Crossing 3. Is Crossing on State Highway 4. Highway Speed Limit ✘ (0) Rural  (1) Urban System? ______35 MPH  (01) Interstate Highway System  (1) Interstate  (5) Major Collector ✘ Yes  No ✘ Posted  Statutory  (02) Other Nat Hwy System (NHS)  (2) Other Freeways and Expressways 5. Linear Referencing System (LRS Route ID) *  (03) Federal AID, Not NHS  (3) Other Principal Arterial ✘ (6) Minor Collector 091 KY-1285 ✘ (08) Non-Federal Aid  (4) Minor Arterial  (7) Local 6. LRS Milepost * 6.3201 7. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 8. Estimated Percent Trucks 9. Regularly Used by School Buses? 10. Emergency Services Route Year ______2016 AADT _____439 ______0 % ✘ Yes  No Average Number per Day ______10  Yes  No Submission Information - This information is used for administrative purposes and is not available on the public website.

Submitted by ______Organization ______Phone ______Date ______Public reporting burden for this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for information collection is 2130-0017. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection, including for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Officer, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, MS-25 Washington, DC 20590. FORM FRA F 6180.71 (Rev. 08/03/2016) OMB approval expires 11/30/2022 Page 2 OF 2

Airport Radius Map

Project Site

Cynthiana-Harrison County Airport – closest airport located 14.10 miles away

Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736)

Distance to the Cynthiana-Harrison County Airport

Nicholas Square Apartments 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) Airport Noise Worksheet

Use this worksheet to identify information needed to evaluate a site’s exposure to aircraft noise.

Name and Location of Project: Nicholas Square Apartments - 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) Name of Airport: Cynthiana-Harrison County Airport Person completing worksheet: Suzie Loveday, Consultant Date: May 1, 2021

1. Determine if the proposed site/project is within 15 miles of a civil or military airport.

No. Attach a scaled map identifying the location of the proposed project site and the location of any airports. Further use of this worksheet is not required. Yes. Attach a scaled map identifying the location of the proposed project site and the location of any airports. Continue.

2. Determine the number of operations at the airport by:  Go to: http://www.gcr1.com/5010web/advancedsearch.cfm  Find your airport using the Search function  Open the report under “Print 5010”  Complete section 3 below by using Operations data found in the report (see yellow arrow in the example below)

3. Determine if the annual number of operations for air carriers (#100), air taxis (#102), military (#105), and general aviation (#103 plus #104) exceeds the thresholds provided below.

#100 Annual air carrier operations 0 _. Is this 9,000 or more? Yes __ No X #102 Annual air taxi operations 386_. Is this 18,000 or more? Yes __ No X #105 Annual military operations 263_. Is this 18,000 or more? Yes __ No X #103+#104 Annual general aviation operations 11,340 _. Is this 72,000 or more? Yes __ No X

4. If you answer “No” on each of the questions above, it is assumed the noise attributed to the airplanes will not extend beyond the boundaries of the airport. Maintain the documentation

R-7 March 2018 in your Environmental Review Record (ERR). You are finished with the evaluation of airport noise for this airport. If you have marked any question in #3 with “Yes,” continue to 5.

5. Contact the airport manager, (see blue arrow above) and ask them if the airport has noise contour maps. Are contour maps available?

Yes. Locate your project on the noise contour map. If there are no roads or railroads that are being considered for noise, utilize the information from the contour map to determine if the site is acceptable. If roads or railroads are being considered, input the information obtained from the airport noise contours, along with the road and railroad information, into HUD online noise calculation tool at http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/environment/dnlcalculator.cfm.

No. Construct the approximate DNL contours by using the guidance on page 52 and 53 of the HUD Noise Guidebook. You will need to obtain the following information from the airport: (a) The number of nighttime jet operations (10pm to 7 am). (b) The number of daytime jet operations (7 am to 10 pm). (c) The flight paths of the major runways. (d) Any available information about expected changes in airport traffic (e.g., will the number of operations increase or decrease in the next 10 to 15 years?).

Contact your HUD Environmental Officer if you need assistance.

R-7 March 2018 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRINT DATE: 04/27/2021 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT MASTER RECORD AFD EFF 04/22/2021 FORM APPROVED OMB 2120-0015

> 1 ASSOC CITY: CYNTHIANA 4 STATE: KY LOC ID: 0I8 FAA SITE NR: 07097.*A > 2 AIRPORT NAME: CYNTHIANA-HARRISON COUNTY 5 COUNTY: HARRISON, KY 3 CBD TO AIRPORT (NM): 2 S 6 REGION/ADO: ASO /MEM 7 SECT AERO CHT: CINCINNATI

GENERAL SERVICES BASED AIRCRAFT 10 OWNERSHIP: PUBLIC > 70 FUEL: 100LL 90 SINGLE ENG: 24 > 11 OWNER: CYNTHIANA-HARRISON COUNTY ARPT BD 91 MULTI ENG: 0 > 12 ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 395 > 71 AIRFRAME RPRS: MINOR 92 JET: 0 CYNTHIANA, KY 41031 > 72 PWR PLANT RPRS: MINOR 93 HELICOPTERS: 0 > 13 PHONE NR: 859-234-5533 > 73 BOTTLE OXYGEN: NONE TOTAL: 24 > 14 MANAGER: ROBERT CRAFT > 74 BULK OXYGEN: NONE > 15 ADDRESS: 40 AIRFIELD LANE 75 TSNT STORAGE: HGR TIE 94 GLIDERS: 0 CYNTHIANA, KY 41031 76 OTHER SERVICES: INSTR 95 MILITARY: 0 > 16 PHONE NR: 859-234-8477 96 ULTRA-LIGHT: 0 > 17 ATTENDANCE SCHEDULE: MONTHS DAYS HOURS ALL ALL 0800-DUSK FACILITIES OPERATIONS > 80 ARPT BCN: CG 100 AIR CARRIER: 0 > 81 ARPT LGT SKED: SEE RMK 102 AIR TAXI: 386 BCN LGT SKED: SS-SR 103 G A LOCAL: 4,935 18 AIRPORT USE: PUBLIC > 82 UNICOM: 122.800 104 G A ITNRNT: 6,405 19 ARPT LAT: 38-21-58.19N ESTIMATED > 83 WIND INDICATOR: YES-L 105 MILITARY: 263 20 ARPT LONG: 84-17-0.04W 84 SEGMENTED CIRCLE: YES TOTAL: 11,989 21 ARPT ELEV: 720.9 SURVEYED 85 CONTROL TWR: NO 22 ACREAGE: 100 86 FSS: LOUISVILLE > 23 RIGHT TRAFFIC: NO 87 FSS ON ARPT: NO OPERATIONS FOR 12 > 24 NON-COMM LANDING: NO 88 FSS PHONE NR: MONTHS ENDING 05/09/2018 25 NPIAS/FED AGREEMENTS: YES / NY1 89 TOLL FREE NR: 1-800-WX-BRIEF > 26 FAR 139 INDEX: /

RUNWAY DATA > 30 RUNWAY IDENT: 11/29 > 31 LENGTH: 3,850 > 32 WIDTH: 75 > 33 SURF TYPE-COND: ASPH-G > 34 SURF TREATMENT: 35 GROSS WT: S 16.0 36 (IN THSDS) D 25.0 37 2D 38 2D/2DS > 39 PCN: //// LIGHTING/APCH AIDS > 40 EDGE INTENSITY: MED > 42 RWY MARK TYPE-COND: NPI- G / NPI- G > 43 VGSI: P2L / P2L 44 THR CROSSING HGT: 41 / 50 45 VISUAL GLIDE ANGLE: 4.00 / 4.00 > 46 CNTRLN-TDZ: - / - > 47 RVR-RVV: - / - > 48 REIL: Y / Y > 49 APCH LIGHTS: / OBSTRUCTION DATA 50 FAR 77 CATEGORY: C / C > 51 DISPLACED THR: / 1094 > 52 CTLG OBSTN: TREES / TREES > 53 OBSTN MARKED/LGTD: / > 54 HGT ABOVE RWY END: 62 / 66 > 55 DIST FROM RWY END: 753 / 205 > 56 CNTRLN OFFSET: 272R / 217R 57 OBSTN CLNC SLOPE: 8:1 / 0:1 58 CLOSE-IN OBSTN: N / Y DECLARED DISTANCES > 60 TAKE OFF RUN AVBL (TORA): 2,757 / 3,852 > 61 TAKE OFF DIST AVBL (TODA): 3,852 / 3,852 > 62 ACLT STOP DIST AVBL (ASDA): 3,852 / 3,852 > 63 LNDG DIST AVBL (LDA): 3,852 / 2,757

(>) ARPT MGR PLEASE ADVISE FSS IN ITEM 86 WHEN CHANGES OCCUR TO ITEMS PRECEDED BY > > 110 REMARKS: A 013 AP BOARD CHAIRMAN: BOBBY CRAFT. A 057 RWY 29 APCH RATIO 19:1 TO DSPLCD THLD. A 058 RWY 29 +58' TREES 178' FM RWY END 178' RIGHT CNTRLN. A 070 FUEL AVBL 24/7 WITH CC. A 081 ACTVT REIL RWY 11 & 29; PAPI RWY 11 & 29 AND MIRL RWY 11/29 - CTAF. A 110-001 FOR CD CTC LEXINGTON APCH AT 859-514-7890.

111 INSPECTOR: ( S ) 112 LAST INSP: 05/09/2018 113 LAST INFO REQ:

FAA FORM 5010-1 (06/2003) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #10

SOLE SOURCE AQUIFERS

WETLANDS MAP

WILD RIVER MANAGEMENT MAPS

ArcGIS Web Map

9/2/2019, 1:28:38 PM 1:9,244,649 0 80 160 320 mi Sole_Source_Aquifers 0 125 250 500 km

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),

Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, NGA, USGS, NPS | US EPA Office of Water | Map Service and data: US EPA Office of Environmental Information (OEI). Data: US Census Bureau | Nicholas Square Apartments

1:3,609 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife May 2, 2021 Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other

Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Pond Riverine National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This page was produced by the NWI mapper

7/25/2020 Red River, Kentucky

NATIONAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT RESOURCES PUBLICATIONS CONTACT US 50 YEARS SITE INDEX

RED RIVER, KENTUCKY

+ –

Choose A State Go Choose A River Go

Rivers of the Southeast define diversity, from bayous and rivers pushed by the tides to clear mountain streams with world-class whitewater.

Legend

+ View larger map

Managing Agency:

U.S. Forest Service, Daniel Boone National Forest

Designated Reach:

December 2, 1993. From the Highway 746 Bridge to the confluence with the School House Branch.

Classification/Mileage:

Wild — 9.1 miles; Recreational — 10.3 miles; Total — 19.4 miles.

RELATED LINKS

Red River (U.S. Forest Service)

Red River Gorge Geological Area (U.S. Forest Service)

https://www.rivers.gov/rivers/red.php 1/2 7/25/2020 Red River, Kentucky

Tim Palmer

Red River

The Red River flows through the Red River Gorge geological area and bisects the Clifty Wilderness. Sandstone cliffs, rock shelters, natural stone arches and boulders provide excellent views of unique geological features nestled among the mountain laurel, rhododendron and hemlocks. The river offers scenic views as well as protection for numerous prehistoric and historic sites featuring unique ethnobotanic remains and other features that led to the designation of this area as a Natural Historic Landmark. The surrounding clifflines are home to the white- haired goldenrod, a plant only found in the Red River Gorge, as well as numerous other species of wildlife. More than 70 species of fish and 16 mussels thrive in the free-flowing waters of the Red River. The scenic beauty and geological formations throughout the river corridor attract thousands of canoeists, kayakers, hikers, rock climbers and backcountry enthusiasts each year.

The U.S. Forest Service maintains one access point at Copperas Creek Canoe Launch on Highway 715. The river is too low for canoeing or kayaking most of the year. However, Class I, II and III rapids may be experienced after late fall and spring floods or heavy rains.

A camping permit is required for dispersed camping in the Red River Gorge Geological Area. Permits can be purchased at local vendors or Gladie Learning Center.

The Red River corridor is black bear habitat. Proper food storage is required. The forest website and area bulletin boards provide additional information regarding food storage requirements and other rules.

NATIONWIDE RIVERS INVENTORY CONTACT US PRIVACY NOTICE Q & A SEARCH ENGINE SITE MAP

Designated Rivers National System River Management Resources

About WSR Act WSR Table Council Q & A Search State Listings Study Rivers Agencies Bibliography Profile Pages Stewardship Management Plans Publications WSR Legislation River Mgt. Society GIS Mapping GIS Mapping Logo & Sign Standards

https://www.rivers.gov/rivers/red.php 2/2 5/24/2021 ArcGIS - Nationwide Rivers Inventory Official

ArcGIS  Nationwide Rivers Inventory Official Open in new Map Viewer

Details Basemap Print Measure -84.024736, 38.316089

Find area, length, or location About Content Legend + Contents | Miles

Nationwide Rivers Inventory Official − Measurement Result 5.07 Miles Topographic

0 0.5 1mi

. Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri . Report Abuse . Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA | Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, INCREMENT P, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Cen

https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=105a104d5a3043b0ba2a25e31ecf3ff1 1/1 5/24/2021 ArcGIS - Nationwide Rivers Inventory Official

ArcGIS  Nationwide Rivers Inventory Official Open in new M

Details Basemap Print Measure -84.024736, 38.3160

About Content Legend + Contents HYDRO_NationwideRiversInventory_ln:

Nationwide Rivers Inventory Official −NRI_ID KY.lickin.bath.s1 River Licking River Topographic Reach Three miles below I-64 bridge to confluence with South Fork Description Wide, deep, free-flowing, well-entrenched stream that traverses scenic rolling valley; variety of unusual flora and riverine species. Original_Recorded_Miles 107.00 GIS_Miles 112 State1 KY State2 None County Pendleton, Bracken, Harrison, Robertson, Nicholas, Bath, Fleming, Rowan Classification Scenic ORV Yes Recreational ORV Yes Geologic ORV Yes Fish ORV Yes Wildlife ORV Yes Historic ORV Yes Cultural ORV Yes Other No Outstandingly Remarkable Value Cultural, Fish, Geologic, Historic, Recreational, Scenic, Wildlife Management_Area_Name Management_Entity_Fed1 Management_Entity_Fed2 Management_Entity_Other1 Management_Entity_Other2 UnitCode NPS_Region Midwest Region Watershed_Name6 Licking HUC_Code6 51,001 Watershed_Name8 Licking HUC_Code8 5,100,101 Zoom to 0 0.5 1mi

. Trust Center . Legal . Contact Esri . Report Abuse . Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA | Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, INCREMENT P, METI/NASA, USG

https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=105a104d5a3043b0ba2a25e31ecf3ff1 1/1

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #11

PUBLIC NOTCE

Environmental Review Record Nicholas Square Apartments Project 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) EXHIBIT PAGES

EXHIBIT #12

CLEARINGHOUSE COMMENTS

ZONING APPROVAL

PART II ESA CHECKLIST DOCUMENTATION

ANDY BESHEAR DEPARTMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT DENNIS KEENE GOVERNOR OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR COMMISSIONER rd 100 AIRPORT ROAD, 3 FLOOR FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY 40601-8204 PHONE (502) 573-2382 FAX (502) 573-2939 TOLL FREE (800) 346-5606/ TDD:711 WWW.kydlgweb.ky.gov

July 1, 2020

Mr. Zach Worsham Nicholas Hill 1390 Olivia Lane, Suite 100 Lexington, KY 40511

RE: Nicholas Square Apartments Rehab SAI# KY202006250844 CFDA# 14.235

Dear Mr. Worsham:

The Kentucky State e-Clearinghouse is the official designated Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for the Commonwealth pursuant to Presidential Executive Order 12372, and supported by Kentucky Statutes KRS 45.031. The primary function of the SPOC is to streamline the review aforementioned process for the applicant and the funding agency. This process helps in vocalizing the statutory and regulatory requirements. Information in the form of comments, if any, will be attached to this correspondence.

This proposal has been reviewed by the appropriate state agencies in the e-Clearinghouse for conflicts with state or local plans, goals and objectives. After receiving this letter, you should make it available to the funding agency and continue with the funding agencies application process. This e-clearinghouse SPOC letter signifies only that the project has followed the state reviewing requirements, and is neither a commitment of funds from this agency or any other state or federal agency. Please remember if any federal reviews are required the applicant must follow through with those federal agencies.

The results of this review are valid for one year from the date of this letter. If the project is not submitted to the funding agency or not approved within one year after the completion of this review, the applicant can request an extension by email to [email protected]. If the project changes in any way after the review, the applicant must reapply through the eclearinghouse for a new review. There are no exceptions.

If you have any questions regarding this letter or the review process please contact the e-Clearinghouse office at 502-573-2382, ext. 274.

Sincerely,

Lee Nalley, SPOC Kentucky State Clearinghouse Attachment

An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D

Bluegrass ADD Shane New

The review was based upon the information that was provided by the applicant through the clearinghouse for this project. The project does not appear to conflict with the mission and goals of the Bluegrass Area Development District.

Department for Environmental Protection Louanna Aldridge

This review was based upon the information that was provided by the applicant through the Clearinghouse for this project. An endorsement of this project does not satisfy, or imply, the acceptance or issuance of any permits, certifications or approvals that may be required from this agency under Kentucky Revised Statutes or Kentucky Administrative Regulations. Such endorsement means this agency has found no major concerns from the review of the proposed project as presented other than those stated as conditions or comments.

Division for Air Quality Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 63:010 Fugitive Emissions states that no person shall cause, suffer, or allow any material to be handled, processed, transported, or stored without taking reasonable precaution to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne. Additional requirements include the covering of open bodied trucks, operating outside the work area transporting materials likely to become airborne, and that no one shall allow earth or other material being transported by truck or earth moving equipment to be deposited onto a paved street or roadway. Please visit the division’s fugitive emissions web site for more information http://air.ky.gov/SiteCollectionDocuments/Fugitive%20Dust%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf

Regulation 401 KAR 63:005 states that open burning is prohibited. Open Burning is defined as the burning of any matter in such a manner that the products of combustion resulting from the burning are emitted directly into the atmosphere without passing through a stack or chimney. However, open burning may be utilized for the expressed purposes listed on the http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx.

Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 58:025, Asbestos Standards, apply to this project if any renovation or demolition occurs. If so, a Kentucky Accredited Asbestos Inspector must inspect the project. Asbestos that will be affected by this activity must be removed by a Kentucky accredited contractor before renovation or demolition begins. Written notification must be given on form DEP 7036 to the Division for Air Quality Regional Office at least 10 weekdays prior the start of demolition or renovation, whether or not asbestos has been identified to be present. Please note form: http://air.ky.gov/Pages/AsbestosInformation.aspx

All solid waste generated by this project must be disposed at a permitted facility. If underground storage tanks are encountered they must be properly addressed. If asbestos, lead paint, and/or other contaminants are encountered during this project, they must be properly addressed.

If the proposed project site is in a designated flood hazard area, application must be made to the Division of Water for a floodplain construction permit. Permission, or exemption, depends upon design and the exact site.

If the construction area disturbed is equal to or greater than 1 acre, the applicant will need to apply for a Kentucky Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (KPDES) stormwater discharge permit from Division of Water.

Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be utilized to control storm water runoff and sediment damage to water quality and aquatic habitat. For technical assistance on the kinds of BMPs most appropriate for projects of this type and related construction, please contact the local Soil and Water Conservation District or the Division of Conservation.

Utility line projects that cross a stream will require a Section 404 permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers and a 401 Water Quality Certification from DOW.

WATER SUPPLY - If an existing water server is to be utilized for new water tap-ons (rehabilitations, new constructions), ascertain the capacity and operating condition of the originating water treatment plant and of the server (if different) in comparison to the water needs of the proposed housing. DOW cannot permit connections to water servers Agreed Orders, or Court Orders. DOW may not give approval to connections to water systems operating near, at, or over capacity. If a new water source is to be utilized, ascertain the source's (stream's or well's) low flow ability to serve the proposed housing. Prior approval from DOW is required for water withdrawals of over 10,000 gallons per day and for all public drinking water. Final plans and specifications are subject to review by DOW.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT - If an existing wastewater server is to be utilized for new wastewater tap-ons (rehabilitations, new construction), ascertain the capacity and operating conditions of the receiving wastewater treatment facility (wastewater treatment plant or package sewage treatment plant) and of the server (if different) in comparison to the wastewater needs of the proposed housing. DOW cannot permit connections to wastewater servers under tap-on bans, Agreed Orders, or Court Orders. DOW may not give approval to connections to wastewater systems at or over hydraulic capacity. If a new wastewater treatment, facility is to be utilized, ascertain the discharge stream's ability to absorb the proposed projects treated wastewater.

Prior approval from DOW is required for all discharges into streams and for all wastewater treatment facilities.

DOW notes the requirements of onsite sewage disposal statutes, KRS 211.350 to 211.380, and administrative regulations, 902 KAR 10:060 to 10:110, must be met. DOW requests provisions be made for future connections to a wastewater treatment system. A Groundwater Protection Plan, as required by 401 KAR 5:037, needs to be prepared by all onsite wastewater system owners. Contact the DOW regarding requirements.

KY Heritage Council Yvonne Sherrick

To receive a review from the KY Heritage Council/State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) you must follow the instructions located on their website at http://www.heritage.ky.gov/siteprotect/ . There you will find the required documents for the Section 106 Review and Compliance for 36 CFR Part 800. This Section 106 submission process to SHPO will assist applicants and agencies in providing the appropriate level of information to receive comments from SHPO. If you have any questions please contact Yvonne Sherrick, Administrative Specialist III, (502) 564-7005, Ext. 113, [email protected].

Please note: If your project is funded through Transportation Alternative (TAP), Transportation Enhancements (TE), Congestion, Mitigation, Air Quality (CMAQ), or Safe Routes to School (SRTS) you will need to send this information to Michael Jones, Historic Preservation Program Administrator with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet via email [email protected] or hard copy to Michael Jones, Office of Local Programs, KY Transportation Cabinet, 200 Mero Street Frankfort, KY 40622. Do not send materials directly to SHPO if your project involves funding from these four sources as it will cause delays in the review process. Michael Jones will consult directly with the SHPO on projects with these funding sources to complete the Section 106 review.

3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA

You are here: EPA Home > Green Book > Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants

Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants

Data is current as of February 28, 2021

The 8-hour Ozone (1997) standard was revoked on April 6, 2015 and the 1-hour Ozone (1979) standard was revoked on June 15, 2005. The asterisk (*) indicates only a portion of the county is included in the designated nonattainment area (NA).

Download National Dataset of all designated areas (currently nonattainment, maintenance, revoked): dbf | xls | Data dictionary (PDF)

Listed by State, County, NAAQS * Part County NA NA Area Name (Classification, if applicable)

ALASKA Fairbanks North Star Borough PM-2.5 (2006) *Fairbanks, AK - (Serious) ARIZONA Cochise County PM-10 (1987) *Paul Spur/Douglas (Cochise County), AZ - (Moderate) Gila County Lead (2008) *Hayden, AZ PM-10 (1987) *Hayden, AZ - (Moderate) PM-10 (1987) *Miami, AZ - (Moderate) Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Hayden, AZ Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Miami, AZ 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Phoenix-Mesa, AZ - (Marginal) Maricopa County PM-10 (1987) *Phoenix, AZ - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Phoenix-Mesa, AZ - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Phoenix-Mesa, AZ - (Marginal) Pima County PM-10 (1987) *Rillito, AZ - (Moderate) Pinal County Lead (2008) *Hayden, AZ PM-10 (1987) *Hayden, AZ - (Moderate) PM-10 (1987) *Miami, AZ - (Moderate) PM-10 (1987) *Phoenix, AZ - (Serious) PM-10 (1987) *West Pinal, AZ - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) *West Central Pinal, AZ - (Moderate) Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Hayden (Pinal County), AZ Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Hayden, AZ 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Phoenix-Mesa, AZ - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Phoenix-Mesa, AZ - (Marginal) Santa Cruz County PM-10 (1987) *Nogales, AZ - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *Nogales, AZ - (Moderate) Yuma County PM-10 (1987) *Yuma, AZ - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Yuma, AZ - (Marginal) CALIFORNIA Alameda County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Amador County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Amador County, CA - (Marginal) Butte County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chico (Butte County), CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Butte County, CA - (Marginal) Calaveras County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Calaveras County, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Calaveras County, CA - (Marginal) Contra Costa County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) El Dorado County PM-2.5 (2006) *Sacramento, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Moderate) Fresno County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Imperial County PM-2.5 (2006) *Imperial Co, CA - (Moderate) https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 1/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA PM-2.5 (2012) *Imperial County, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Imperial County, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Imperial County, CA - (Marginal) Inyo County PM-10 (1987) *Owens Valley, CA - (Serious) Kern County PM-10 (1987) *East Kern Co, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (1997) *San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) *San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) *San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Kern Co (Eastern Kern), CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Kern County (Eastern Kern), CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Kings County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Los Angeles County Lead (2008) *Los Angeles County-South Coast Air Basin, CA PM-2.5 (1997) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert), CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert), CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) Madera County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Marin County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Mariposa County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Mariposa County, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Mariposa County, CA - (Marginal) Merced County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Mono County PM-10 (1987) *Mono Basin, CA - (Moderate) Napa County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Nevada County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Nevada Co. (Western part), CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Nevada County (Western part), CA - (Moderate) Orange County PM-2.5 (1997) Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) Placer County PM-2.5 (2006) *Sacramento, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Moderate) Plumas County PM-2.5 (2012) *Plumas County, CA - (Moderate) Riverside County PM-10 (1987) *Coachella Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (1997) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Morongo Band of Mission Indians - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Riverside Co, (Coachella Valley), CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Morongo Band of Mission Indians, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Riverside County (Coachella Valley), CA - (Severe 15) Sacramento County PM-2.5 (2006) Sacramento, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Sacramento Metro, CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Sacramento Metro, CA - (Moderate) San Bernardino County https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 2/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA PM-10 (1987) *San Bernardino Co, CA - (Moderate) PM-10 (1987) *Trona, CA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (1997) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert), CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert), CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA - (Extreme) San Diego County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *San Diego County, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *San Diego County, CA - (Moderate) San Francisco County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) San Joaquin County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) San Luis Obispo County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *San Luis Obispo (Eastern San Luis Obispo), CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *San Luis Obispo (Eastern part), CA - (Marginal) San Mateo County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Santa Clara County PM-2.5 (2006) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Solano County PM-2.5 (2006) *Sacramento, CA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Sonoma County PM-2.5 (2006) *San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *San Francisco Bay Area, CA - (Marginal) Stanislaus County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Sutter County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Sacramento Metro, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Sutter Buttes, CA - (Marginal) Tehama County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Tuscan Buttes, CA - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Tuscan Buttes, CA - (Marginal (Rural Transport)) Tulare County PM-2.5 (1997) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2006) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Serious) PM-2.5 (2012) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Joaquin Valley, CA - (Extreme) Tuolumne County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Tuolumne County, CA - (Marginal) Ventura County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Ventura County, CA - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Ventura County, CA - (Serious) Yolo County PM-2.5 (2006) *Sacramento, CA - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Sacramento Metro, CA - (Severe 15) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Sacramento Metro, CA - (Moderate) COLORADO Adams County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Arapahoe County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Boulder County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Broomfield County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 3/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA Denver County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Douglas County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Jefferson County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Larimer County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) Weld County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Denver Metro/North Front Range, CO - (Marginal) CONNECTICUT Fairfield County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Hartford County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Marginal) Litchfield County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Marginal) Middlesex County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) New Haven County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) New London County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Marginal) Tolland County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Marginal) Windham County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Greater Connecticut, CT - (Marginal) DELAWARE New Castle County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Sussex County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Seaford, DE - (Marginal) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA District of Columbia 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) GEORGIA Bartow County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) Clayton County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) Cobb County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) DeKalb County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) Fulton County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) Gwinnett County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) Henry County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Atlanta, GA - (Marginal) GUAM Guam Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Piti, GU Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Tanguisson, GU Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Piti-Cabras, GU IDAHO Bannock County PM-10 (1987) *Fort Hall Indian Reservation - (Moderate) Franklin County PM-2.5 (2006) *Logan, UT-ID - (Moderate) Power County PM-10 (1987) *Fort Hall Indian Reservation - (Moderate) Shoshone County PM-2.5 (2012) *West Silver Valley, ID - (Moderate) ILLINOIS Cook County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) DuPage County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Grundy County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 4/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Kane County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Kendall County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Lake County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Madison County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Alton Township, IL 8-Hour Ozone (2015) St. Louis, MO-IL - (Marginal) McHenry County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) St. Clair County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) St. Louis, MO-IL - (Marginal) Will County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) INDIANA Clark County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Louisville, KY-IN - (Marginal) Daviess County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Southwest Indiana, IN Floyd County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Louisville, KY-IN - (Marginal) Huntington County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Huntington, IN Lake County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Pike County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Southwest Indiana, IN Porter County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) IOWA Muscatine County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Muscatine, IA KANSAS Saline County Lead (2008) *Saline County, KS KENTUCKY Boone County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Bullitt County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Louisville, KY-IN - (Marginal) Campbell County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Jefferson County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Louisville, KY-IN - (Marginal) Kenton County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Oldham County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Louisville, KY-IN - (Marginal) LOUISIANA Evangeline Parish Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Evangeline Parish (Partial), LA St. Bernard Parish Sulfur Dioxide (2010) St. Bernard Parish, LA MARYLAND Anne Arundel County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Anne Arundel County and Baltimore County, MD 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Baltimore, MD - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Baltimore, MD - (Marginal) Baltimore County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Anne Arundel County and Baltimore County, MD 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Baltimore, MD - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Baltimore, MD - (Marginal) Baltimore city 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Baltimore, MD - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Baltimore, MD - (Marginal) Calvert County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Carroll County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Baltimore, MD - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Baltimore, MD - (Marginal) Cecil County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Charles County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Frederick County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Harford County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Baltimore, MD - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Baltimore, MD - (Marginal) https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 5/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA Howard County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Baltimore, MD - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Baltimore, MD - (Marginal) Montgomery County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Prince George's County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) MASSACHUSETTS Dukes County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dukes County, MA - (Marginal) MICHIGAN Allegan County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Allegan County, MI - (Marginal) Berrien County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Berrien County, MI - (Marginal) Livingston County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) Macomb County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) Monroe County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) Muskegon County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Muskegon County, MI - (Marginal) Oakland County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) St. Clair County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*St. Clair, MI 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) Washtenaw County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) Wayne County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Detroit, MI 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Detroit, MI - (Marginal) MINNESOTA Dakota County Lead (2008) *Eagan, MN MISSOURI Dent County Lead (2008) *Iron, Dent, and Reynolds Counties, MO Franklin County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *St. Louis, MO-IL - (Marginal) Iron County Lead (2008) *Iron, Dent, and Reynolds Counties, MO Jackson County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Jackson County, MO Jefferson County Lead (1978) *Jefferson County (part); Herculaneum, MO Lead (2008) *Jefferson County, MO Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Jefferson County, MO Reynolds County Lead (2008) *Iron, Dent, and Reynolds Counties, MO St. Charles County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) St. Louis, MO-IL - (Marginal) St. Louis County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) St. Louis, MO-IL - (Marginal) St. Louis city 8-Hour Ozone (2015) St. Louis, MO-IL - (Marginal) MONTANA Flathead County PM-10 (1987) *Flathead County; Whitefish and vicinity, MT - (Moderate) Lake County PM-10 (1987) *Polson, MT - (Moderate) PM-10 (1987) *Ronan, MT - (Moderate) Lincoln County PM-2.5 (1997) *Libby, MT - (Moderate) Rosebud County PM-10 (1987) *Lame Deer, MT - (Moderate) Sanders County PM-10 (1987) *Sanders County (part); Thompson Falls and vicinity, MT - (Moderate) Silver Bow County PM-10 (1987) *Butte, MT - (Moderate) Yellowstone County Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Laurel Area (Yellowstone County), MT NEVADA Clark County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Las Vegas, NV - (Marginal) NEW JERSEY Atlantic County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Bergen County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Burlington County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Camden County https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 6/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Cape May County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Cumberland County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Essex County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Gloucester County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Hudson County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Hunterdon County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Mercer County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Middlesex County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Monmouth County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Morris County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Ocean County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Passaic County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Salem County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Somerset County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Sussex County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Union County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Warren County Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Warren Co, NJ 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) NEW MEXICO Dona Ana County PM-10 (1987) *Anthony, NM - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Dona Ana County (Sunland Park Area), NM - (Marginal) NEW YORK Bronx County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Chautauqua County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Jamestown, NY - (Marginal) Kings County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Nassau County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) New York County PM-10 (1987) New York Co, NY - (Moderate) 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Queens County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Richmond County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Rockland County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Suffolk County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) Westchester County https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 7/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA 8-Hour Ozone (2008) New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - (Moderate) OHIO Butler County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Clermont County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Cuyahoga County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Geauga County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Hamilton County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Lake County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Lorain County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Medina County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Morgan County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Muskingum River, OH Portage County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Summit County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cleveland, OH - (Marginal) Warren County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Cincinnati, OH-KY - (Marginal) Washington County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Muskingum River, OH OREGON Klamath County PM-2.5 (2006) *Klamath Falls, OR - (Moderate) Lane County PM-10 (1987) *Lane Co, OR - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *Oakridge, OR - (Moderate) PENNSYLVANIA Allegheny County PM-2.5 (1997) *Liberty-Clairton, PA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2006) *Liberty-Clairton, PA - (Moderate) PM-2.5 (2012) Allegheny County, PA - (Moderate) Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Allegheny, PA 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) Armstrong County Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Armstrong Co, PA Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Indiana, PA 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) Beaver County Lead (2008) *Lower Beaver Valley, PA Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Beaver, PA 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) Berks County Lead (2008) *Lyons, PA Lead (2008) *North Reading, PA 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Reading, PA - (Marginal) Bucks County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Butler County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) Carbon County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA - (Marginal) Chester County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Delaware County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Fayette County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) Indiana County Sulfur Dioxide (2010) Indiana, PA Lancaster County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Lancaster, PA - (Marginal) Lehigh County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA - (Marginal) Montgomery County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Northampton County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA - (Marginal) Philadelphia County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE - (Marginal) Warren County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Warren, PA Washington County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 8/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA Westmoreland County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA - (Marginal) PUERTO RICO Arecibo Municipio Lead (2008) *Arecibo, PR Bayamon Municipio Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*San Juan, PR Catano Municipio Sulfur Dioxide (2010) San Juan, PR Guaynabo Municipio Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*San Juan, PR Salinas Municipio Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Guayama-Salinas, PR San Juan Municipio Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*San Juan, PR Toa Baja Municipio Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*San Juan, PR TENNESSEE Sullivan County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Sullivan County, TN TEXAS Anderson County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Freestone and Anderson Counties, TX Bexar County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) San Antonio, TX - (Marginal) Brazoria County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Chambers County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Collin County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Dallas County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Denton County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) El Paso County PM-10 (1987) *El Paso Co, TX - (Moderate) Ellis County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Fort Bend County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Freestone County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Freestone and Anderson Counties, TX Galveston County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Harris County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Johnson County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Kaufman County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Liberty County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) Montgomery County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Marginal) Panola County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Rusk and Panola Counties, TX Parker County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Rockwall County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) Rusk County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Rusk and Panola Counties, TX Tarrant County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) Titus County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Titus County, TX Waller County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX - (Serious) Wise County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Dallas-Fort Worth, TX - (Marginal) UTAH https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 9/10 3/29/2021 Current Nonattainment Counties for All Criteria Pollutants | Green Book | US EPA Box Elder County PM-2.5 (2006) *Salt Lake City, UT - (Serious) Cache County PM-2.5 (2006) *Logan, UT-ID - (Moderate) Davis County PM-2.5 (2006) Salt Lake City, UT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Northern Wasatch Front, UT - (Marginal) Duchesne County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Uinta Basin, UT - (Marginal) Salt Lake County PM-2.5 (2006) Salt Lake City, UT - (Serious) Sulfur Dioxide (1971) Salt Lake Co, UT 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Northern Wasatch Front, UT - (Marginal) Tooele County PM-2.5 (2006) *Salt Lake City, UT - (Serious) Sulfur Dioxide (1971)*Tooele Co, UT 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Northern Wasatch Front, UT - (Marginal) Uintah County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Uinta Basin, UT - (Marginal) Utah County PM-2.5 (2006) *Provo, UT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Southern Wasatch Front, UT - (Marginal) Weber County PM-2.5 (2006) *Salt Lake City, UT - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Northern Wasatch Front, UT - (Marginal) VIRGINIA Alexandria city 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Arlington County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Fairfax County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Fairfax city 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Falls Church city 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Loudoun County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Manassas Park city 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Manassas city 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) Prince William County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) Washington, DC-MD-VA - (Marginal) WISCONSIN Kenosha County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI - (Serious) 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Chicago, IL-IN-WI - (Marginal) Manitowoc County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Manitowoc County, WI - (Marginal) Milwaukee County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Northern Milwaukee/Ozaukee Shoreline, WI - (Marginal) Oneida County Sulfur Dioxide (2010)*Rhinelander, WI Ozaukee County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Northern Milwaukee/Ozaukee Shoreline, WI - (Marginal) Sheboygan County 8-Hour Ozone (2015) *Sheboygan County, WI - (Marginal) WYOMING Lincoln County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Upper Green River Basin Area, WY - (Marginal) Sublette County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) Upper Green River Basin Area, WY - (Marginal) Sweetwater County 8-Hour Ozone (2008) *Upper Green River Basin Area, WY - (Marginal)

Discover. Connect. Ask.

Follow.

2021-02-28

https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. 10/10

AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD

KENTUCKY HOUSING CORPORATION HOME PROGRAM

for the

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736) June 9, 2021

Loveday Consulting LLC 4421 Rivard Ln, Lexington, KY 40509 (859) 248-5434

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number  Project Abstract 2  Project Data 3  Level of Review Determination 6-8  Part I: Statutory Checklist 9  Part II: Environmental Assessment 12  Summary of Findings 14  Preparer and Responsible Entity Certification 16

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT 1 Project Location Maps and Photos EXHIBIT 2 Airport Hazards EXHIBIT 3 FEMA Floodplain Map EXHIBIT 4 Phase One ESA EXHIBIT 5 Endangered Species Consultation EXHIBIT 6 Explosive and Flammable Hazards – Aboveground Storage Tanks EXHIBIT 7 USDA Farmland Report EXHIBIT 8 Kentucky Heritage Council’s SHPO and THPO Consultations EXHIBIT 9 Noise Documentation: Roadways, Railroads and Airports EXHIBIT 10 Sole Source Aquifer, Wetlands and Wild River Management Maps EXHIBIT 11 Public Notice EXHIBIT 12 Clearinghouse Comments and Zoning Approval

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

PROJECT ABSTRACT

FORMAT II Name of Grantee

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Winterwood Development/Nicholas Place LLC

Application/Grant Number

SAI# KY202006250844 CFDA# 14.239

From: June 9, 2021 To: June 9, 2026 XX Original Revisions Amendments

Project Name: Nicholas Square Apartments

Locations of Physical Development: 227 E North St, Carlisle, Nicholas County, KY 40311 (38.316089, -84.024736)

Funding Agency: Kentucky Housing Corporation

Name and Title of Certifying Officer: Jeremy Ratliff, General Counsel/Deputy Executive Director Legal &Compliance Address: 1231 Louisville Road, Frankfort, KY 40601 Email: [email protected]

Lead Agency: Winterwood Development/Nicholas Place LLC Address: 1390 Olivia Lane, Suite 100, Lexington, KY 40511 Project Representative: Bryan Lloyd, Director of Development Telephone: (859) 276-5388 Email: [email protected]

Environmental Review Preparer: Name: Loveday Consulting LLC Address: 4421 Rivard Ln, Lexington, KY 40509 Contact Person: Suzie Loveday, Consultant Telephone: (859) 248-5434 Email: [email protected]

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

PROJECT DATA

Funding Information, Summary Description and Purpose

Estimated Funding Breakdown

Grant Number HUD Program Funding Amount RN21-1047-01 HOME $500,000

Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount: $500,000

Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]: $4,700,890

Sources of Funding: HOME $ 500,000 HOME Match $ 25,000 USDA 515 Loan $ 931,933 Bank Construction Loan $ 2,663,516 Deferred Developer Fee $ 106,990 Reserve Deposit $ 6,536 GP Equity Contribution $ 100 LIHTC Syndication Proceeds $ 3,130,331 Total Project Funding: $ 4,700,890

Project Summary Description [24 CFR 58.32, 40 CFR 1508.25] Include all contemplated actions which logically are either geographically or functionally a composite part of the project, regardless of the source of funding.

The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) provides formula grants to States and localities that communities use - often in partnership with local nonprofit groups - to fund a wide range of activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people. HOME is the largest Federal block grant to state and local governments designed exclusively to create affordable housing for low-income households.

Nicholas Place LLC, a newly formed, single asset, special purpose, Kentucky Limited Liability Company was formed by Winterwood Development for the sole purpose of acquiring, rehabilitating, operating and leasing the 5.25-acre property known as Nicholas Square Apartments in Carlisle, Nicholas County, Kentucky.

The property was built in the early to mid-1980s and consists of (7) two-story residential buildings featuring 36 one, two, and three-bedroom units. The one-bedroom units are garden style, while the two and three-bedroom units are townhome. Additionally, there is an office, community and laundry room. The intent of the renovation is to maximize energy efficiency, provide new living amenities, update and replace mechanical equipment, and refinish the exterior of the buildings with long lasting maintenance free materials. 3

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

The environmental review is valid for five years. Specific funded activities may include, but not be limited to: - Acquisition - Soft costs such as construction financing fees, permanent financing fees, application and tax credit fees, appraisals, title searches, professional fees, reserves, syndication costs, property surveys, and other soft costs - Fees related to title transfer, recording, closing costs, and similar charges - Funds for contingencies - New Construction - Relocation of the sanitary and stormwater infrastructure - Site Utilities and amenities, including parking - Architectural/engineering design fees and inspection - Preparation of plans, specifications and bid documents - Construction inspection - Planning/Administrative/Developer fees

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROJECT:

Nicholas Place Apartments is an existing family-oriented USDA RD complex that contains 36 units, 20 of which receive rental assistance. According to KHC, RD, and HUD, there are five total affordable housing developments located in Nicholas County, all of which are located in Carlisle. Of those five complexes, only one is considered directly competing as it is a family- oriented Section 8 development that features rental assistance. Given the low supply of other affordable housing properties, the high occupancy rates of all affordable housing units in Carlisle, a high demand for these renovated units is anticipated. According to the developer, no tenants will be displaced during renovations.

The site is located in a rural neighborhood with few affordable housing opportunities. There has been minimal development of single and multifamily residences in the area, particularly conventional market rate units. Thus, the highest and best use of the site as if vacant is development of subsidized multi-family housing as demand warrants.

Last, due to COVID-19, suburban rentals are becoming more popular for remote workers. Major technology companies are committed to remote work, and many more firms are following suit. Some companies may even transition to long-term virtual working, which will influence renter preferences. Space may become a higher priority over location as renters seek an accommodating work-from-home setup.

Existing Conditions and Trends: [24 CFR 58.40(a)] Describe the existing conditions of the project area and its surroundings, and the trends likely to continue in the absence of the project.

The city of Carlisle is the county seat of Nicholas County, Kentucky. It is located at the junction of Kentucky Route 32 and Kentucky Route 36, about halfway between Lexington and Maysville.

Carlisle was founded in 1816 when John Kincart donated land to facilitate the relocation of the county seat from Ellisville, 5 miles (8.0 km) to the north. The town was probably named for Carlisle, Pennsylvania, hometown of Kincart's father. The fourth, and final, courthouse was built in 1893-1894 which is still in use today as are most of the buildings along Main Street and Courthouse Square which 4

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

were built in the 1890’s and 1900’s.

Per the 2019 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, the estimated population for the city of Carlisle is 5,326. The educational attainment level (bachelor’s degree or higher) for Carlisle is 9.9%, which is significantly less than Kentucky’s level of 25.1%. A majority of the population (97.6%) is white with 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native and 1.4% Black. The Hispanic ethnicity of the community is 1.5%. According to the American Community Survey 2019 1-year estimate, Carlisle has a lower median household income, $35,352, and a higher poverty rate, 30.3% than the state of Kentucky ($52,295) and (16.3%).

PROJECT AND AREA MAPS AND PLANS:

The site contains an apartment complex known as the Nicholas Square Apartments, 227 E. North Street, Carlisle, Kentucky. The property is accessible from E. North Street and an access road known as Nicholas Square. The property consists of seven apartment buildings and an office building along with parking and green space. Survey information (CDP Engineers) indicates that the site is 5.27 acres. The property is serviced by city water, city sewer, Kentucky Utilities (electric) and the site has electric heat.

The office building contained an upper level with management offices, restroom, storage, and laundry areas. The lower level contained two maintenance rooms with storage of equipment, tools, parts, appliances, and supplies including paint, cleaning compounds, maintenance chemicals, and small amounts of gasoline (no indication of spills or odors). One of the maintenance rooms contained locked storage areas for residents.

The exterior of the apartment property consists of the access road leading to the rear of the property, grass and vegetated areas. Parking areas and trash dumpsters are located throughout the site. Drainage ditches are also visible and located throughout since the property is located on a hillside and generally slopes towards the west. A drainage area is located on the northern part of the site and flows towards the State highway garage where it flows into a culvert (underlying garage property) and then discharges to the drainage area west of the State garage. The property is surrounded by residential properties with the Nicholas County State highway garage located directly west.

Historical property use appears to have been farmland until the apartments were constructed in 1983. Surrounding areas were also generally farmland with residences located along North Street. The State highway garage appears to have built in the 1950s with the surrounding residences to the north and east constructed beginning in about the 1960s/1970s.

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Level of Review Determination

EXEMPT ACTIVITIES (24 CFR 58.34)

X (1) Environmental and other studies, resource identification and the development of plans and strategies; (2) Information and financial services; X (3) Administrative and management activities (4) Public services that will not have a physical impact or result in any physical change, including, but not limited to services concerned with employment, crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education, counseling, energy conservation and welfare or recreational needs; X (5) Inspections and testing of properties for hazards or defects; (6) Purchase of insurance; (7) Purchase of tools; X (8) Engineering or design costs; (9) Technical assistance and training; X (10) Assistance for temporary or permanent improvements that do not alter environmental conditions and are limited to protection, repair, or restoration activities necessary only to control or arrest the effects from disasters, imminent threats or physical deterioration; (11) Payment of principal and interest on loans made or obligations guaranteed by HUD; (12) Any of the categorical exclusions listed in 58.35(a) provided that there are not circumstances which require compliance with any other Federal laws and authorities cited in 58.5.

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (not subject to 58.5) 24 CFR 58.35(b)

(1) Tenant-based rental assistance; (2) Supportive services including, but not limited to health care, housing services, permanent housing placement, day care, nutritional services, short-term payments for rent/mortgage/utility costs, and assistance in gaining access to local, State, Federal government benefits and services; (3) Operation costs, including but not limited to, equipment purchases, inventory financing, interest subsidy, operation expenses and similar costs not associates with construction or expansion of existing operations. (4) Economic development activities, including but not limited to, equipment purchases, inventory financing, interest subsidy, operating expenses and similar costs not associated with construction or expansion of existing operations; (5) Activities to assist homeownership of existing “or new dwelling units not assisted with Federal funds” including closing costs and down payment assistance to homebuyers interest buy-down and similar activities that result in the transfer of title to a property; X (6) Pre-development activities including legal, consulting, developer, and other costs related to obtaining site options, project financing, administrative costs and fees for loan commitments, zoning approvals, and other related activities which do not have a physical impact (7) Approval of supplemental assistance (including insurance or guarantee) to a project previously approved under this part, if the approval is made by the same responsible entity that conducted the environmental review on the original project and re-evaluation of the environmental findings is not required under Sec. 58.47

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Level of Review Determination Continued

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (subject to 58.5) 24 CFR 58.35(a)

(1) Acquisition, repair, improvement, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements (other than buildings) when the facilities and improvements are in place and will be retained in the same use without change in size or capacity of more than 20% (e.g. replacement of water or sewer lines, reconstruction of curbs and sidewalks, repaving of streets); (2) Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers that restrict the mobility of and accessibility to elderly and handicapped persons. (3) Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements when the following conditions are met: (i) In the case of multifamily residential buildings: (A) Unit density is not changed more than 20%: (B) The estimated cost of rehabilitation is less than 75% of the estimated cost of replacement after rehabilitation. (C) The project does not involve changes in land use from residential to non-residential: and (ii) In the case of non-residential structures, including commercial, industrial and public buildings: (A) The facilities and improvements are in place and will not be changed in capacity by more than 20%, and (B) The activity does not involve a change in land use, such as from non-residential to residential, commercial to industrial, or from one industrial use to another. (4) An individual action on a one to four family dwelling or an individual action on a project of five or more units developed on scattered sites when the sites are more than 2,000 feet apart and there are not more than four units on any one site. (5) Acquisition or disposition of an existing structure or acquisition of vacant land provided for the same use.

DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS

(1) The project is a continuation of a multi-year activity for which an Environmental Review was previously completed as 24 CFR 58.32 (d). The original environmental review record was prepared in: (year). The environmental review record was amended in:…

(2) A previous environmental review or assessment was performed and it has been reevaluated per 24 CFR 58.47. (Attach re-evaluation). The original environmental review record was prepared in: (year). The environmental review record was amended in:…

(3) The project is an exempt activity not requiring any environmental review, as determined by 24 CFR 58.34 (a)(1) – (12), however, the other requirements listed in 58.6 still apply (checklist is attached). No release of funds process is required in accordance with 58.34 (b).

(4) This project has been determined to be categorically excluded not subject to 58.5 was state in 24 CFR Part 58.35 (b), however, the other requirements listed in 58.6 still apply (checklist is attached). No release of funds process is required in accordance with 58.35 (b). 7

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

(5) The project has been initially determined to be a categorical exclusion under the provisions of 224 CFR 58.35 (a) and:

An Environmental Review has been conducted and a determination made that none of the requirements in 58.5 will trigger compliance actions, therefore, the project will revert to an exempt activity per 58.34 (a)(12). No release of funds process is required in accordance with 58.34(b).

X An Environmental Review has been conducted and a Statutory checklist item has been triggered which requires a request for release of funds to be published.

X (6) The project requires a full environmental assessment per 24 CFR Part 58.36.

It is the finding of Kentucky Housing Corporation that the activities proposed in this review consist of activities which require a full environmental assessment per 24 CFR 58.36.

______Date ECO: Jeremy Ratliff, General Counsel/Deputy Executive Director Legal &Compliance

June 9, 2021 Date Prepared by: Suzie Loveday, Loveday Consulting LLC

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Part I: Statutory Checklist [24CFR §58.5]

Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional documentation as appropriate.

Compliance Factors: Statutes, Are formal Compliance determinations Executive Orders, and Regulations compliance steps

listed at 24 CFR §58.5 and §58.6 or mitigation required? STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 and 58.6 Airport Hazards Yes No The project site is not within 15,000 feet of a military 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D airport or 2,500 feet of a civilian airport. The closest airport is the Cynthiana-Harrison County Airport which is located 14.10 miles west of the project site. This airport is located outside of the 2,500-foot threshold. The project is in compliance with Airport Hazards requirements. Coastal Barrier Resources Yes No This project is located in a state that does not contain Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as CBRS units. Therefore, this project is in compliance amended by the Coastal Barrier with the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. Improvement Act of 1990 [16 USC 3501] Flood Insurance Yes No The FIRMette map for the project site demonstrates that Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 it is in an area of minimal flood hazard (Panel and National Flood Insurance Reform Act #21181C0110C, eff. 8/5/2010). The project is in of 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC compliance with flood insurance requirements. 5154a] STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.5 Clean Air Yes No The project's county or air quality management district Clean Air Act, as amended, particularly is in attainment status for all criteria pollutants. section 176(c) & (d); 40 CFR Parts 6, 51, Nicholas County is not in non-attainment or 93 maintenance status for any criteria pollutants. See EPA's greenbook county list, found at: https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html#KY. The project is in compliance with the Clean Air Act. Coastal Zone Management Yes No This project is located in a state that does not participate Coastal Zone Management Act, sections in the Coastal Zone Management Program. Therefore, 307(c) & (d) this project is in compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act. Contamination and Toxic Substances Yes No Site contamination was evaluated as follows: ASTM 24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2) Phase I ESA. On-site or nearby toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances that could affect the health and safety of project occupants or conflict with the intended use of the property were not found. The project is in compliance with contamination and toxic substances requirements. Endangered Species Yes No This project is comprised of rehabilitation of an existing Endangered Species Act of 1973, 36-unit multifamily housing complex. There is no 9

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT particularly section 7; 50 CFR Part 402 impact to endangered species as the project is in an existing footprint. This project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act. Explosive and Flammable Hazards Yes No This project is comprised of rehabilitation of an existing 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C 36-unit multifamily housing complex which is exempt from explosive and flammable hazard mitigation. No additional follow-up is required. The project is in compliance with explosive and flammable hazard requirements. Farmlands Protection Yes No This project is comprised of rehabilitation of an existing Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981, 36-unit multifamily housing complex which is exempt particularly sections 1504(b) and 1541; 7 from the Farmland Protection Policy Act. This project CFR Part 658 does not include any activities that could potentially convert agricultural land to a non-agricultural use as the site is in a previously developed area. The project is in compliance with the Farmland Protection Policy Act. Floodplain Management Yes No The FIRMette map for the project site demonstrates that Executive Order 11988, particularly it is in an area of minimal flood hazard (Panel section 2(a); 24 CFR Part 55 #21181C0110C, eff. 8/5/2010). The project is in compliance with floodplain management requirements. Historic Preservation Yes No A May 18, 2021 letter from the Kentucky Heritage National Historic Preservation Act of Council (SHPO) states “Our review indicates that the 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; proposed project will not impact any properties or sites 36 CFR Part 800 that are listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The proposed project should not require an archaeological survey or cultural historic survey.” Consultation with Tribal Historic Preservation Officer is not required because the project does not consist of any of the activities that require a consultation, based on HUD’s “Appendix A When to Consult with Tribes Under Section 106.” Noise Abatement and Control Yes No Major Noise Source, Road or Highway: Based on the Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended attached google map showing a 1,000 feet radius of the by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978; site, there are 2 roadways that have traffic counts within 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B 1,000 feet. However, N. Walnut Street ends perpendicularly and does not run alongside the property line. Therefore, no assessment was completed for that roadway.

The project site is located 421.45 feet from Highway 32/South Broadway which has a total AADT of 2,510 for 2011 (highest level over 10-year period). The % for Single Truck volume as a percentage of AADT is 6.015%. 2,510 x 6.015% = 151 (medium trucks). The % of Combo truck volume is 1.549%. 2,510 x 1.549% = 39 (heavy trucks). 2,510 – 151 - 39 = 2,320 (cars). See attached report from KYTC. Standard assumption of night volume of 15% was used. The average speed is 35 MPH. The average road grade of the segment of Highway 32, approximately 1,000 feet either side of a perpendicular line between the project site and the

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

highway is .9% (1,000 feet north elevation is 923. 1,000 feet south elevation is 873. The difference is 50. 50/2000 feet = 2.5%.) Per the HUD DNL Calculator, the dnl for this roadway is 46. Railroad: The project site is located 1,232.58 feet from an active railroad that has no horns. There is 1 daytime train and 0 nighttime trains. The average speed is 10 mph. Per the HUD DNL Calculator, the dnl for the railroad is 38. See attached maps from KYTC, google earth, and the Federal Rail Administration.

Airport: Per the attached map, there is one FAA regulated civil airport located within 15 miles of the project site. The closest airport is the Cynthiana- Harrison County Airport which is located 14.10 miles west of the project site. According to the attached report and small airport worksheet, the project site will not be noise impacted by the airport.

The total combined DNL that includes all sources is 49, per the attached HUD DNL Calculator. Therefore, no noise mitigation is required. The site is in compliance with Noise Abatement and Control. Sole Source Aquifers Yes No Based on the project description, the project consists of Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as activities that are unlikely to have an adverse impact on amended, particularly section 1424(e); 40 groundwater resources as the project consists of CFR Part 149 rehabilitation of existing buildings. The project is in compliance with Sole Source Aquifer requirements. Wetlands Protection Yes No Based on the project description this project includes no Executive Order 11990, particularly activities that would require further evaluation under sections 2 and 5 this section as the project does not consist of new construction. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 11990. Wild and Scenic Rivers This project is not within proximity of a NWSRS river. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, Yes No The project site is 42.13 miles from the Wild and Scenic particularly section 7(b) and (c) portions of the Red River, Kentucky’s only Wild and Scenic River, and is 5.07 miles from Licking River, the nearest Nationwide Rivers Inventory body. The project is in compliance with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Environmental Justice Yes No No adverse environmental impacts were identified in Executive Order 12898 the project's total environmental review. The rehabilitation of the existing 36-unit multifamily housing complex will not lead to any adverse environmental impacts. The project is in compliance with Executive Order 12898.

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Part II: Environmental Assessment Checklist [Environmental Review Guide HUD CPD-782, 24 CFR 58.40; 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.27]

Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 &1508.27] Recorded below is the qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and resources of the project area. Each factor has been evaluated and documented, as appropriate and in proportion to its relevance to the proposed action. Verifiable source documentation has been provided and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and supportive source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where applicable, the necessary reviews or consultations have been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obtained or noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clear. Additional documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have been clearly identified.

Impact Codes: Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each factor. (1) Minor beneficial impact (2) No impact anticipated (3) Minor Adverse Impact – May require mitigation (4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require an Environmental Impact Statement

Environmental Impact Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation LAND DEVELOPMENT Conformance with 1 The property is currently zoned R-2, Residential and is an existing multi-family Plans / Compatible property located in Carlisle, KY. The continued use of the property as an affordable Land Use and housing multi-family complex is compatible with the land use, scale and urban Zoning / Scale and design of Carlisle, KY. Urban Design Soil Suitability/ Design of the project and construction methods employed will work to ensure that Slope/ Erosion/ 2 the project does not negatively affect slope or erosion of the surrounding Drainage/ Storm neighborhood. The proposed project will not create or contribute runoff water that Water Runoff would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Hazards and 2 This project involves rehabilitation of an existing property that was constructed Nuisances post-1978, therefore, there is no opportunity for lead-based paint or asbestos to be including Site encountered. Per the attached Phase One ESA, there are no EPA-monitored Safety and Noise facilities within a 3,000-foot radius of the project site that could be sources of pollution. The noise levels combined have a dnl of 49 which does not require noise mitigation. Energy 2 The state of Kentucky requires developments to meet the KY Residential Building Consumption Code and encourages the use of Green Building Techniques and Energy Efficient Design Components.

Environmental Impact Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation SOCIOECONOMIC Employment and 1 The improvement of existing affordable housing is potentially beneficial to the Income Patterns employment and income patterns of Carlisle. Demographic 1 The rehabilitation of the 36-unit multifamily affordable housing units will have a Character Changes, positive impact on Carlisle as it improved the stock of affordable housing, and there Displacement is always a need for quality affordable housing in Carlisle. 12

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Environmental Impact Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Educational and 2 Primary and secondary education is provided to the county by the Nicholas County Cultural Facilities Public Schools which includes one elementary, one middle school, and one high school. The project scope is contained and small in nature and will not negatively impact educational facilities. Cultural facilities that Carlisle has to offer include historic downtown, historic homes, historic landmarks museums, and many others. Commercial 2 This project is located in Carlisle, Kentucky which is a primarily rural area with Facilities access to various commercial facilities. All shopping and other commercial facilities are located less than 1 mile from the project site. Health Care and 2 The project area is located within a rural area. There are multiple medical facilities Social Services in Carlisle, the closest of which is the Carlisle Clinic located .30 miles from the project site. Additional social services are located in the city of Carlisle, many of which are approximately 1 mile from the site. Solid Waste 2 The project is located within a rural area with access to adequate solid waste Disposal / services provided by Advanced Disposal. Recycling Waste Water / 2 The proposed project will not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed Sanitary Sewers the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial sources of polluted runoff. Water Supply 2 The project is located within a rural area with access to adequate municipal water supply supplied by Carlisle Water Works Plant. Public Safety - 2 The project is located within a rural area with access to adequate municipal policing Police, Fire and services, fire services, and emergency services provided by the city of Carlisle Emergency located less than 1 mile from the project site. Medical Parks, Open Space 2 There are many open space opportunities throughout the city such as well- and Recreation maintained historical sites, trails, hiking, camping, golf, fishing, kayaking, horses, pools, sporting facilities, skateparks, parks, and many more. This project will have no effect on access and capacity for Parks, Open Space and Recreation. Transportation and 2 Transportation is provided by the Federated Transportation Services of the Accessibility Bluegrass (FTSB). This project will have no impact on transportation and accessibility.

Environmental Impact Assessment Factor Code Impact Evaluation NATURAL FEATURES Unique Natural 2 There are no unique agricultural lands present on the project site. The project will Features, have no impact on water resources or unique natural features. Water Resources Vegetation, 2 There is no unique vegetation or wildlife on the site, and there were no obvious Wildlife areas of stressed vegetation or wildlife observed on-site.

Other Factors 2 None

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Summary of Findings

Additional Studies Performed:

Phase One ESA

Field Inspection (Date and completed by): The property was inspected by Anne S. Childress, Project Manager of Childress & Associates, LLC on March 18, 2021.

List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]:

Kentucky Heritage Council; US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory; FEMA Flood Map Service Center; National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; Nationwide Rivers Inventory; EPA Sole Source Aquifers for Drinking Water Interactive Map; Federal Aviation Administration Airport Master Record; Federal Railroad Administration; Kentucky Transportation Cabinet; EPA Greenbook; Google Earth Pro; Google Maps, and Kentucky Clearinghouse.

List of Permits Obtained:

All required building permits will be obtained prior to construction.

Public Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43]:

The public was notified about the Combined Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds (NOIRROF) via publication of a classified advertisement in the Carlisle Mercery on June 9, 2021. Public comment will be accepted for 15 days following the publication of the Carlisle Mercery classified ad with the public comment period ending June 24, 2021. The Environmental Review Record (ERR) for this project will be made available for public review during the comment period via a physical copy at the office of Winterwood Development at 1390 Olivia Lane, Suite 100, Lexington, KY 40511. The physical copy will be available for public examination and copying, upon request, between the hours of 9A.M. and 4 P.M. An electronic version was posted on Winterwood Development’s website at www.winterwoodonline.com.

Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32]:

There are no mitigating environmental factors resulting from the proposed project. The property is located in a low to moderate-income neighborhood and has good access to commercial amenities, institutional uses, healthcare, and employment centers. Overall, it is considered well-suited to an affordable housing residential development.

Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.9]

1. No action - leave the area as it is with no corrective action. It is possible that the property would continue to deteriorate, and displacement of current households would occur. Furthermore, the Carlisle community needs quality, affordable housing. 2. Acquire a different piece of property - the location is ideal for the project as the existing 36-unit development needs critical updating to maintain quality, affordable housing and is a centrally located property in a primarily urban area where adequate housing is a need for the community.

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

3. Proceed with Project. This is the best use of the project site.

No Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40(e)]:

To "Do nothing" alternative is unacceptable is unacceptable as there is a critical need for affordable housing in Carlisle, KY. The move to an alternate site is also unacceptable as the property needs to be rehabilitated to maximize energy efficiency, provide new living amenities, update and replace mechanical equipment, and refinish the exterior of the buildings with long lasting maintenance free materials. Summary of Findings and Conclusions: There were no mitigating environmental factors resulting from the proposed project. The project is in compliance with all related laws and authorities. The project site is not located in a floodplain or a wetland. There are no historical preservation concerns. The site is not located close to a Wild and Scenic River or Nationwide Rivers Inventory body. There are no sole source aquifers in Kentucky. The site will not impact endangered species. The land is not comprised of Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. There are no explosive or flammable hazards such as above ground storage tanks within one mile of the project site that are within the acceptable separation distance required by HUD. Nicholas County's air quality is in compliance with federal standards. There is no evidence of contamination or toxic substances that would pose a threat. There are no noise or airport hazards in proximity to the project site.

Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1505.2(c)] Summarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non-conformance with the above-listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan.

Law, Authority, or Mitigation Measure or Condition Comments on Complete Factor Completed Measures None

Mitigation Plan

Permits and local, State and Federal regulations as required during the construction will be enforced and followed. Construction activities will be monitored to ensure safety.

NICHOLAS SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT

Preparer and Responsible Entity’s Certifications Regarding the Impacts of the Proposed Action on the Environment

Determination:

1. Is project in compliance with applicable laws and regulations Yes No

2. Is an EIS required? Yes No

3. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) can be made. The Project will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Yes No

Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.27] The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.

Finding of Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27] The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

Preparer Signature: ______Date June 9, 2021

Name/Title/Organization: Suzie Loveday, Consultant, Loveday Consulting LLC

Certifying Officer Signature: ______Date:______

Name/Title: Jeremy Ratliff, General Counsel/Deputy Executive Director Legal & Compliance

This signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part 58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s).