DOCSLIB.ORG

Arctic Alpine Ecosystems and People in a Changing Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arctic Alpine Ecosystems and People in a Changing Environment Jon Børre Ørbæk Roland Kallenborn Ingunn Tombre Else Nøst Hegseth Stig Falk-Petersen Alf Håkon Hoel Editors Arctic Alpine Ecosystems and People in a Changing Environment with 86 Figures and 10 Tables Dr. Jon Børre Ørbæk Dr. Else N. Hegseth Norwegian Polar Institute Norwegian College of Fishery Science Svalbard University of Tromsø P.O.Box 505 Breivika 9171 Longyearbyen 9037 Tromsø Norway Norway Dr. Roland Kallenborn Dr. Stig Falk-Petersen Norwegian Institute Norwegian Polar Institute for Air Research Polar Environmental Centre Polar Environmental Centre 9296 Tromsø 9296 Tromsø Norway Norway Dr. Ingunn Tombre Dr. Alf H. Hoel Norwegian Institute University of Tromsø for Nature Research Department of Political Science Polar Environmental Centre Breivika 9296 Tromsø 9037 Tromsø Norway Norway Cover photograph: Bjørn Fossli Johansen, Norwegian Polar Institute, 2005 Library of Congress Control Number: 2006935137 ISBN-10 3-540-48512-4 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN-13 978-3-540-48512-4 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. Springer is a part of Springer Science+Business Media springer.com © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007 The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: E. Kirchner, Heidelberg Production: Almas Schimmel Typesetting: camera-ready by authors Printing: Krips bv, Meppel Binding: Stürtz AG, Würzburg Printed on acid-free paper 30/3141/as 5 4 3 2 1 0 18 Modeling of long-range transport of contaminants from potential sources in the Arctic Ocean by water and sea ice Vladimir Pavlov Norwegian Polar Institute, Polar Environmental Centre, N-9296, Tromsø, Norway, e-mail: [email protected] 18.1 Introduction The geographical position and climatic features of the Arctic seas mean that their ecological balance is sensitive to disturbance by inputs of man- made pollutants. The Arctic seas represent zones where pollutants natu- rally accumulate and pollutants are transported between regions where there is active exploitation of natural resources and pollution, and the ecol- ogically clean regions of the central Polar Basin. The processes involved in the transport, transformation and accumulation of contaminants from dif- ferent possible sources are important in assessing whether we are to fore- cast the fate of potential pollutant releases. These sources and potential sources are described by several reports and papers (Yablokov Commis- sion Report 1993; Aarkrog 1993; Pavlov and Pfirman 1995; Duursma and Carroll 1996; ANWAP 1997; AMAP 1997; AMAP 1998; Champ et al. 1998; Yablokov 2001). In some Arctic seas, such as the Barents and Kara seas, there were earlier local sources of anthropogenic origin, connected with the nuclear trials at the test site of Novaya Zemlya and dumping of radioactive waste over their areas. Extensive dumping of nuclear materials in the Kara and Barents seaɵ marine environment is listed in the Yablokov Commission Report (1993) and in Yablokov (2001). Low level liquid ra- dioactive wastes are stored in the following regions of Russia in large vol- umes: by the northern fleet in the Kola Peninsula in the Murmansk and Severodvinsk regions, and by the Pacific fleet in the Russian Far East in the naval ship yards at Vladivostok. The combined capacity of all Northern Fleet containers amounts to 10,000 m3 and annual production is estimated to be about 20,000 m3. Approximately 30 to 40,000 m3+ of solid radioac- tive waste is stored at different sites in the Russian Far East and Northwest 330 Vladimir Pavlov (ANWAP 1997; AMAP 1998; Champ et al. 1998). The discharges of fresh water from the large Arctic rivers that have huge catchment areas draining water from land areas and industrial zones also contribute to the input of pollutants into the Arctic Ocean. Ocean currents and drifting ice are among the most important mecha- nisms of pollutant transport (Nürnberg et al. 1994; Emery et al. (1997); Pfirman et al. 1997; Nilsson 1997; Rigor and Colony 1997; Smith et al. 1998; Smith and Ellis 1999; Zhang et al. 2000; Rigor et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2003; Pfirman et al. 2004a; Pfirman et al. 2004b). Severe natural condi- tions and the year-round presence of drifting ice make direct full-scale ob- servations of currents difficult and expensive. Numerical modelling, sup- ported and validated by in situ field observations, is therefore the only practical possibility for gaining an understanding of water circulation in the Arctic Ocean on different spatial and temporal scales. Many models describing transport and transformation of various pollutants in the water environment of the Arctic have appeared in recent years inspired by in- creasing anthropogenic effects, especially in coastal zones (Preller and Cheng 1995; Pavlov et al. 1995; Harms 1997; Scott et al. 1997; AMAP 1998; Nies et al. 1999; Harms and Karcher 1999; Harms et al. 2000; Karcher et al. 2004 and others). In these papers, modelling results for the spreading of contaminants from individual sources, mostly located in the Nordic seas and Kara Sea, were discussed. For example, Harms (1997) has described the application of 3-D, baroclinic circulation models to study the dispersal of radioactivity in the Barents and Kara seas. Release is expected to occur at underwater dump sites for radioactive waste in the Kara Sea, used by the former Soviet Union. To cover the wide range of a possible ra- dionuclide dispersion, two different spatial scales were considered: i) the regional scale, which covered the shelves of the Barents and Kara seas and ii) the local scale, which is focused on the bay where some of the dumping took place. The regional-scale model results have suggested that, even for a worst case scenario, the radioactive contamination of Siberian coastal waters would be relatively small compared to observations in other marine systems (e.g. the Baltic Sea and the Irish Sea). Realistic gradual release scenarios show very low concentrations in the central and eastern Kara Sea. Significant contamination of shelf seas such as the Laptev Sea, the Arctic Ocean or the Barents Sea by radioactive waste dispersion from the Kara Sea seems unlikely. Nies et al. (1999) presented a review of results from a joint project car- ried out in Germany in order to assess the consequences to the marine en- vironment from the dumping of nuclear waste in the Kara and Barents seas. The project consisted of experimental work on measurements of ra- dionuclides (137Cs, 90Sr, 239+240Pu, 238Pu, 241Am) in samples from the Arctic 18 Modelling long-range transport of contaminants by water and sea ice 331 marine environment, and numerical modelling of the potential pathways and dispersion of contaminants in the Arctic Ocean. The role of transport by sea ice from the Kara Sea into the Arctic Ocean was assessed. This transport process might be considered as a rapid contribution of pollutants due to entrainment of contaminated sediments into sea ice, followed by export from the Kara Sea by the Transpolar Ice Drift, and subsequent re- lease in the Arctic Ocean in the region of the East Greenland Current. Nu- merical modelling of pollutant dispersion from the Kara and Barents seas was carried out both on a local scale, for the Barents and Kara seas, and for long range dispersion into the Arctic and Atlantic oceans. 3-D baroclinic circulation models were applied to trace the transport of pollutants. Model- ling results show no significant pollution even for worst case scenarios from the radioactive waste dumped in the Kara Sea to other seas in the Arctic or North Atlantic (as in Harms 1997). The results from the disper- sion models suggest that, even for worst case scenarios, the contamination of Arctic waters and North Atlantic areas is relatively minor compared to pre-contamination from Sellafield, or global fallout from nuclear weapon testing in the 1960s. Long range simulations of Sellafield discharges of 137Cs since the 1960s correlates well with measured levels. Harms et al. (2000) investigated the role of Siberian river runoff for the transport of possible river contaminants in the Arctic Ocean. 3-D coupled ice-ocean models of different horizontal resolution were applied to simulate the dis- persion of river water from the Ob, Yenisei and Lena. Circulation model results explain the main pathways and transit times of Siberian river water in the Arctic Ocean. Kara Sea river water clearly dominates in the Siberian branch of the Transpolar Drift, while the water from the Lena dominates in the Canadian Branch. The model confirms that contaminant transport through sediment laden sea ice offers a short and effective pathway for pollutant transport from Siberian rivers to the Barents and Nordic seas. Karcher et al. (2004) have compared the simulated dispersion of 99Tc in surface water from the sources to the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean as calculated by a hydrodynamic model and in assessment box model with field-observations from 1996 to 1999 to study concentrations, pathways and travel times. The observations cover the northern part of the Nordic Seas. The main sources of 99Tc are global fallout from nuclear weapon testing, and discharges from reprocessing plants for spent nuclear fuel in Northwestern Europe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007
    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: [email protected]].
    [Show full text]
  • Particularly Sensitive Seas Areas (Pssas)
    Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas Recommendation WWF calls on the Environment Ministers of the Baltic Organization (IMO) to the need for action. In addition, and North-East Atlantic to agree to take concerted action the Contracting Parties should work co-operatively within the framework of the International Maritime within the IMO to achieve an appropriate response, Organization (IMO) to promote the Baltic Sea, including action at a regional or local level. In a the Barents Sea and the waters of Western Europe*, comparable but more specific way, Article 8 of the 1992 as Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSA) Helsinki Convention, in conjunction with its Annex IV, along with appropriate protective measures. provides the basis for Baltic states to work * co-operatively at regional level and within the The waters of Portugal, Spain including the waters to the Straits of IMO to prevent pollution from shipping. Gibraltar, France, and to the west and east of Ireland and the UK, including the Irish Sea and relevant parts of the North Sea. Background Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs) are areas of the seas and oceans that need special protection through briefing action by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) because of their ecological, economic, cultural or scientific significance and their vulnerability to harmful Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas impacts from shipping activities. To date 5 PSSAs have PSSAs can benefit valuable ecosystems such as coral been designated globally and the 6th off the coast of reefs, intertidal wetlands and important marine and Peru is in the pipeline. The most recently designated coastal habitats. They are also important for migrating site, the Wadden Sea, is the first PSSA in European seabirds, dolphins, seals or other marine species, as well waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Ocean Climate and Ecosystem Status Report Summary 2009
    IRISH OCEAN CLIMATE AND ECOSYSTEM STATUS REPORT SUMMARY 2009 The sea is critically important in moderating Ireland’s weather, since the majority of weather systems that affect us day to day come from the Atlantic Ocean. However, there has been very little research to date on the affects of climate change on the sea, which will inevitably impact on the various sectors that make up Ireland’s maritime economy. A fi rst step in any study of the effect of climate change on our oceans is to study the current status of Irish waters against which any future change can be measured. This can be done by examining existing data sets on oceanography, plankton and productivity, together with information on marine fi sheries and migratory species such as salmon, trout and eels. The aim of this report card is to outline the available scientifi c data on the atmosphere, oceanography, ocean chemistry, phytoplankton, zooplankton, commercial fi sheries, seabirds and migratory fi sh. Copies of the full report, Irish Ocean Climate & Ecosystem Status Report 2009, are available from Marine Institute, Rinville, Oranmore, Co. Galway, Ireland. Alternatively you can download a pdf version from www.marine.ie The Atmosphere Ireland’s climate is by no means stable in time. It is affected by a number of cyclic patterns with timescales varying in length from a year or two, to thousands of years. Some of these variations “fl ip-fl op” or oscillate between two geographical locations on a regular basis and are referred to as Atmospheric Teleconnection Patterns (ATPs). The most important of these are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Names of Sub-Areas and Divisions of FAO Fishing Areas 27 and 37 NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC
    Names of Sub-areas and Divisions of FAO fishing areas 27 and 37 NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC Subarea I Barents Sea Subarea II Norwegian Sea, Spitzbergen, and Bear Island Division II a Norwegian Sea Division II b Spitzbergen and Bear Island Subarea III Skagerrak, Kattegat, Sound, Belt Sea, and Baltic Sea; the Sound and Belt together known also as the Transition Area Division III a Skagerrak and Kattegat Division III b,c Sound and Belt Sea or Transition Area Division III b (23) Sound Division III c (22) Belt Sea Division III d (24-32) Baltic Sea Subarea IV North Sea Division IV a Northern North Sea Division IV b Central North Sea Division IV c Southern North Sea Subarea V Iceland and Faroes Grounds Division V a Iceland Grounds Division V b Faroes Grounds Subarea VI Rockall, Northwest Coast of Scotland and North Ireland, the Northwest Coast of Scotland and North Ireland also known as the West of Scotland Division VI a Northwest Coast of Scotland and North Ireland or West of Scotland Division VI b Rockall Subarea VII Irish Sea, West of Ireland, Porcupine Bank, Eastern and Western English Channel, Bristol Channel, Celtic Sea North and South, and Southwest of Ireland - East and West Division VII a Irish Sea Division VII b West of Ireland Division VII c Porcupine Bank Division VII d Eastern English Channel Division VII e Western English Channel Division VII f Bristol Channel Division VII g Celtic Sea North Division VII h Celtic Sea South Division VII j South-West of Ireland - East Division VII k South-West of Ireland - West Subarea VIII Bay of Biscay
    [Show full text]
  • SESSION I : Geographical Names and Sea Names
    The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names Types of the International Standardization of Sea Names: Some Clues for the Name East Sea* Sungjae Choo (Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Kyung-Hee University Seoul 130-701, KOREA E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract : This study aims to categorize and analyze internationally standardized sea names based on their origins. Especially noting the cases of sea names using country names and dual naming of seas, it draws some implications for complementing logics for the name East Sea. Of the 110 names for 98 bodies of water listed in the book titled Limits of Oceans and Seas, the most prevalent cases are named after adjacent geographical features; followed by commemorative names after persons, directions, and characteristics of seas. These international practices of naming seas are contrary to Japan's argument for the principle of using the name of archipelago or peninsula. There are several cases of using a single name of country in naming a sea bordering more than two countries, with no serious disputes. This implies that a specific focus should be given to peculiar situation that the name East Sea contains, rather than the negative side of using single country name. In order to strengthen the logic for justifying dual naming, it is suggested, an appropriate reference should be made to the three newly adopted cases of dual names, in the respects of the history of the surrounding region and the names, people's perception, power structure of the relevant countries, and the process of the standardization of dual names.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Ocean Irish Sea Celtic
    Ireland’s Great Golf Ballyliffin Glashedy 7 0 25Km 50Km 76 71 18 5 50 14 Courses 66 17 72 34 25Mi 50Mi 82 with Ireland’s Best Golf Tour Operator 28 20 44 Derry 64 Letterkenny 60 41 38 1 48 1 Royal Portrush Dunluce 29 43 Carne 78 20 50 Belfast 57 9 27 54 51 13 6 Enniskillen 36 87 Portstewart Strand Sligo 2 79 4 85 Lahinch Old 50 21 39 99 Irish Westport Cavan 33 49 30 Sea Drogheda 5 83 Royal County Down 31 46 33 26 9 3 53 The Golf Course 22 44 at Adare Manor 62 45 90 4 61 50 10 Dublin 24 12 16 65 Galway Athlone 47 75 69 42 55 3 25 43 8 37 14 70 86 29 Portmarnock 2 96 91 15 45 81 40 24 68 35 73 35 46 47 89 63 95 21 7 41 80 32 BallybunionAtlantic Old 52 75 74 Ocean 5 19 Ennis 31 94 23 10 Limerick 12 56 88 50 84 4 Carlow 59 The K Club Ryder Cup Course 18 100 3 1 27 1 34 6 Kilkenny 44 11 Tralee 37 58 92 13 19 11 Tralee Wexford Waterford 26 4 The European Club 30 50 Killarney 23 38 77 49 28 93 97 22 Contact Fairways and FunDays 42 98 3 – Ireland’s Best Golf Tour Operator 36 2 25 40 16 d International: +353 45 871110 48 2 15 d Toll Free from US & Canada: 1800-7799810 39 8 Celtic de 17 Cork [email protected] 32 dw www.fairwaysandfundays.com 67 50 Sea d @fairwaysfundays c facebook.com/fairwaysandfundays Waterville Old Head f fairwaysandfundays Golf Courses Tourist Attractions 1 Adare 26 County Louth 51 Kirkistown Castle 76 Rosapenna (X3) 1 Adare Heritage Village 19 Glendalough 35 Powerscourt House, Gardens and Waterfall 2 Ardglass 27 County Sligo 52 Lahinch (X2) 77 Rosslare 2 Aran Islands 20 Glenveagh National Park 36 Ring of Kerry 3
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Sea, Seabed and Surficial Geology and Processes
    DTI Strategic Environmental Assessment Area 6, Irish Sea, seabed and surficial geology and processes Continental Shelf and Margins Commissioned Report CR/05/057 May 2005 1 SEA6 GEOLOGY ________________________________________________________________________ BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTINENTAL SHELF AND MARGINS COMMISSIONED REPORT CR/05/057 DTI Strategic Environmental Assessment Area 6, Irish Sea, seabed and surficial geology and processes Keywords Irish Sea, hydrocarbons prospectivity, strategic environmental assessment, seabed processes, seabed habitats, bathymetric charts, seabed stress, seabed sediments, seabed bedforms, sandwaves, sandbanks, sand transport, deeps, bathymetry, seafloor mapping. Front cover Terrain model of the submarine study area and adjacent England, Wales and Scotland. Submarine vertical topography has been exaggerated by 50 times and the mainland topography has been exaggerated by 10 times. Topographic data for the mainland of Ireland were not available at the time of this report. Bibliographical reference HOLMES, R, and TAPPIN, D R. 2005. DTI Strategic This document was produced as part of the UK Department of Environmental Assessment Area Trade and Industry’s offshore energy Strategic Environmental 6, Irish Sea, seabed and surficial geology and processes. British Assessment programme. The SEA programme is funded and Geological Survey managed by the DTI and coordinated on their behalf by Geotek Ltd Commissioned Report, CR/05/057. and Hartley Anderson Ltd. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Edinburgh 2005 i Foreword As part of an ongoing programme, the Department of Trade and Industry is undertaking Strategic Environmental Assessments prior to United Kingdom Continental Shelf licence rounds for oil and gas exploration and production and consents for wind-farm renewable energy developments. Before regional development proceeds, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) consults with the full range of stakeholders in order to identify areas of concern and establish best environmental practice.
    [Show full text]
  • German Exploitation of Irish Neutrality, 1939-1945
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1967 German exploitation of Irish neutrality, 1939-1945 Bruce McGowan The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McGowan, Bruce, "German exploitation of Irish neutrality, 1939-1945" (1967). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2443. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2443 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GERMAN EXPLOITATION OF IRISH NEUTRALITY 1939 - 1945 By Bruce J, McGowan B. A, University of Montana, I965 Presented In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1967 Approved by : TAJ,,d T, Chairman, Board of Examiners , -J Deanr7 Graduate School Date UMI Number; EP34251 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI EP34251 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Sea Crossing Conundrum
    A technical briefing produced by the Institution of Civil Engineers’ Engineering Knowledge team Long span or deep crossing? Irish Sea Crossing conundrum The technical civil engineering challenges of a crossing between Great Britain and Northern Ireland are significant. Is such a bridge or tunnelled solution plausible? This briefing sheet explores the issues. The idea of a crossing between Great Britain and Ireland (or possibly the Republic of Ireland). With Hendy Northern Ireland was previously mooted by Prime due to produce an interim report by January 2021, and Minister Boris Johnson when he was Foreign Secretary. his final recommendations by next summer, the key A tall order it may seem, but it is now set to be given engineering and funding challenges will be a crucial greater consideration as part of the Department for component of his work. Transport’s union connectivity review. Civil engineers are capable of designing and building The review, which is being undertaken by Network Rail links over or under waters with depths between 50-150m, chairman Sir Peter Hendy, will explore how connectivity as would be encountered in the Irish Sea, even though across the UK can be improved to support economic solutions of this nature are at the very limits of current growth and quality of life, particularly while the country technologies. But where would it run, how much could faces a challenging recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic. it cost, and should it be rail or road, or both? We asked two leading experts and ICE Fellows – independent Its remit includes studying the feasibility of a fixed link bridge consultant Simon Bourne and independent tunnel across the Irish Sea between Great Britain and Northern consultant Bill Grose – for their thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • An INIRO DUCTION
    Introduction to the Black Sea Ecology Item Type Book/Monograph/Conference Proceedings Authors Zaitsev, Yuvenaly Publisher Smil Edition and Publishing Agency ltd Download date 23/09/2021 11:08:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/12945 Yuvenaiy ZAITSEV шшшшшшишшвивявшиншшшаттшшшштшшщ an INIRO DUCTION TO THE BLACK SEA ECOLOGY Production and publication of this book was supported by the UNDF-GEF Black Sea Ecosystem Recovery Project (BSERP) Istanbul, TURKEY an INTRO Yuvenaly ZAITSEV TO THE BLACK SEA ECOLOGY Smil Editing and Publishing Agency ltd Odessa 2008 УДК 504.42(262.5) 3177 ББК 26.221.8 (922.8) Yuvenaly Zaitsev. An Introduction to the Black Sea Ecology. Odessa: Smil Edition and Publishing Agency ltd. 2008. — 228 p. Translation from Russian by M. Gelmboldt. ISBN 978-966-8127-83-0 The Black Sea is an inland sea surrounded by land except for the narrow Strait of Bosporus connecting it to the Mediterranean. The huge catchment area of the Black Sea receives annually about 400 ктУ of fresh water from large European and Asian rivers (e.g. Danube, Dnieper, Yeshil Irmak). This, combined with the shallowness of Bosporus makes the Black Sea to a considerable degree a stagnant marine water body wherein the dissolved oxygen disappears at a depth of about 200 m while hydrogen sulphide is present at all greater depths. Since the 1970s, the Black Sea has been seriously damaged as a result of pollution and other man-made factors and was studied by dif­ ferent specialists. There are, of course, many excellent works dealing with individual aspects of the Black Sea biology and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea of Japan” Came Into Gradual Use and Acceptance in Europe from the 18Th Century
    The name “Sea of Japan” came into gradual use and acceptance in Europe from the 18th century. Sea of Japan More than 97% of maps used throughout the world display only the name “Sea of Japan”. Methods Used for Designating Geographical Names t is likely that the name “Sea of Japan” came to be Sea” (separated from the Indian Ocean by the Andaman generally accepted because of one geographical factor : Islands), the “Gulf of California” (separated from the this sea area is separated from the Northern Pacific southeastern part of the Northern Pacific Ocean by the by the Japanese Archipelago. California Peninsula), the “Irish Sea” (separated from the northeastern part of the North Atlantic Ocean by Ireland) As described above, western explorers explored this sea area and so on. (See Fig. 3.) from the late 18th century to the early 19th century and clarified the topographical features of the Sea of Japan. One of According to Kawai, the “East Sea” name advocated by them, Adam J. Krusenstern, wrote in his diary of the voyage, ROK is based upon another method of naming, a method “People also call this sea area the Sea of Korea, but because that names a sea area based upon a direction from a specific only a small part of this sea touches the Korean coast, it is country or region toward that sea area. Examples include the better to name it the Sea of Japan.” “North Sea” and the “East China Sea.” However, according to Kawai, a comparison of the naming methods used for the In fact, this sea area is surrounded by the Japanese “East Sea” and for the “Sea of Japan” shows that while the Archipelago in the eastern and the southern parts, and by the “East Sea” is a subjective name as viewed from the Asian Continent in its northern and western parts.
    [Show full text]