MINUTES OF THE SIXTH MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE ON INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME (IWMP) HELD ON 22.09.2009 UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF SECRETARY (LR) AT NBO BUILDING, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI

The 6th meeting of the Steering Committee on Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) was held on 22.09.2009 under the chairmanship of Secretary (LR) at NBO Building, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. The list of participants is at Annexure-I. The fifth meeting of the Steering Committee was held on 18.09.2009.

The Secretary (LR) welcomed the participants and requested the Programme Officers of the DoLR to present the proposals received from the States to the Committee. The Programme Officers made a presentation on State Perspective & Strategic Plan and Preliminary Project Reports submitted in respect of new projects under IWMP by the SLNAs of , Himachal Pradesh and Karnataka .

Regarding the presentation on Karnataka, the Programme Officer informed that out of 25940 treatable micro-watersheds in the State, 9172 micro-watersheds have been covered under various watershed schemes. The balance treatable micro-watersheds are 16768 for which the State has prepared a plan to cover these under IWMP during the remaining period of XI Plan and next three Five Year Plans. During 2009-10, the State has proposed to treat 966 micro-watersheds over an area of 4.91 lakh ha against the allocated target of 3.4 lakh ha.

During the discussion, the State representative from Karnataka requested the Committee that the central funds under IWMP be released to the District Watershed Development Office (DWDO) instead of placing the funds with ZPs for smooth implementation and monitoring of the programme. The State representative from Andhra Pradesh requested the Committee that the central funds under IWMP be released directly to the District Water Management Agency (DWMA) instead of routing the funds through DRDAs as DWMA which implements the watershed programme in the District, is a registered Society with District Collector as the Chairman. The Chairman suggested that requests from the Chief Secretary of the States to this effect may be forwarded to DoLR for further consideration.

Page 1 of 15

Regarding the mandatory certificates, the State representative informed that the authorization letter from the State Govt., for signing all the mandatory certificates would be submitted to DoLR within a week.

On the livelihoods issues of Karnataka, the Committee pointed out that value addition to primary produce may be included as an intervention in the proposed project areas. On the expected outcomes from proposed projects, the State representative informed that the single cropping pattern in the project areas is expected to change to double cropping due to resultant increase in moisture retention and moisture availability for a longer duration.

Shri Himanshu Kulkarni suggested that the indicators for the outcomes on water quality need clarity and should be in defined units. The State representative informed that this aspect will be kept in view while preparing the DPRs.

On the districtwise proposals for Karnataka, the Committee advised that the proposed Chitradurga – II and Tumkur-VII projects should be reframed to make these contiguous with the already treated areas. Further, each of the proposed project may be renumbered according to the priority in the District. Shri Himanshu Kulkarni suggested that the drivers for selection of watershed in a District should also be indicated in Districtwise presentation. The Committee suggested that a State map showing the overall status of watersheds covered and proposed should be included in the presentation.

After considering the districtwise proposals, the Committee appraised and approved 119 projects over an area of 491470 ha for the year 2009-10 as proposed by Karnataka.

Regarding the presentation on Andhra Pradesh, the Programme Officer informed that out of 26,968 treatable micro-watersheds in the State, 9,518 micro-watersheds have been covered under various watershed schemes. The balance treatable micro-watersheds are 17,450 for which the State has prepared a plan to cover these under IWMP during the remaining period of XI Plan and next three Five Year Plans. During 2009-10, the State has proposed to treat 952 micro-watersheds over an area of 4.75 lakh ha against the allocated target of 4.4 lakh ha.

On the issue of Capacity Building the State representative informed that the State is well equipped with its own Capacity Building Centres (District Livelihood Resource Page 2 of 15

Centres & Cluster level Livelihood Resource Centres) manned by trained Course Directors. The Committee suggested that the model of Andhra Pradesh may be studied further for replication in other States. The Committee enquired from the State representative if the State can extend training to other States with Central assistance. The State representative informed that the existing facilities in the State can be utilized for Training of Trainers (ToTs) from other States.

The Chairperson requested all State representatives to popularize one-year Diploma course on Watershed Management, being sponsored by DoLR and to be launched by IGNOU in January 2010 among the rural youth so that the skilled manpower is available at the village level. Regarding the livelihood interventions proposed by the State, the Committee suggested that while processing of animal skins and providing a market to the rural targeted population is a good intervention in the tribal areas, the State may also simultaneously make use of animal bones for making handicrafts, bonemeal, etc. Further, the Committee also advised that Information Technology skills should be introduced amongst the rural youth. The State representative informed that the paraworkers in the rural areas are being trained on agriculture and veterinary services and are also being provided with necessary kits for this purpose. Regarding the drinking water problem, it was suggested that the treatment plants for providing safe drinking water to rural population can be set up under EPA in the problem villages.

On the districtwise proposals, the Committee pointed out that information on areas of already treated villages within the geohydrological unit proposed as project may also be included. It was pointed out that partly/ fully treated villages should be excluded from the proposed area for treatment. The State representative assured that this information will be submitted to DoLR.

After considering the districtwise proposals, the Committee appraised and approved 110 projects over an area of 473441 ha for the year 2009-10, except Anantpur-XII (Dampetla) as the project was planned for treatment during the remaining period of the XI Plan.

On the presentation for Himachal Pradesh, The programme Officer informed the Committee that the State had proposed for 293 micro-watersheds over an area of Page 3 of 15

2,41,248 ha against the allocation of 90,000 ha. The State representative informed that the State has indicated the areas covered under the pre-IWMP watershed programmes and areas proposed to be undertaken under IWMP on Block maps as the watershed maps for the State indicating the State Perspective & Strategic Plan are under preparation and these will be submitted to DoLR shortly. During the discussions, the State representative from Himachal Pradesh stated that the fund flow through DRDA is satisfactory and this arrangement may continue for Himachal Pradesh.

Regarding the Capacity Building interventions, the Committee suggested that Himachal Pradesh Institute of Public Administration (HIPA) should be included in the list of Capacity Building institutions for the State. Regarding development of cold deserts, the State representative informed that the State would utilize the services of Snow and Avalanche Study Establishment (SASE), Manali for this purpose. The Committee agreed to the proposal of the State for enlisting the institutes having expertise in watershed management for providing technical support in DPR preparation.

On the livelihood interventions, the health resorts in Palampur area was cited as a possible intervention for upscaling in other such potential areas. On the enquiry regarding the arrangements made for extending the benefits from community property resources (CPRs) to the assetless people, the State representative informed that the State will make conscious efforts to extend the benefits to assetless from CPRs to reduce the gap between farmers and assetless in the project areas.

The Committee also suggested to explore the possibility of providing training to rural people in trades like plumbing, knitting, IT, candle making, etc. Dr. Ravi Chopra informed that creation of spring sanctuary is a necessary activity to protect the source of water as the rural population has to depend on natural source of water for drinking purpose for at least 3 to 4 months in a year.

The State representative informed that the major focus of the State would be on water harvesting measures like farm ponds, check dams, etc. so that high rainfall areas can benefit from increased storage of water for irrigation and other purposes. Dr. Ravi Chopra suggested that pisciculture can be introduced in such areas to reap added benefits from such interventions.

Page 4 of 15

After considering the district wise proposals, the committee agreed in principle to approve all the projects over an area of 2,03,832 ha, except Chamba –II and Chamba-III, proposed by the State which the Committee suggested that these two projects should be taken in subsequent years. The Committee also advised the State to break the projects into smaller units of approximately 5000 to 6000 ha and assign these to different PIAs. Further, the State may strengthen the implementing units in Districts having more than 25000 ha under projects to provide dedicated PIAs in the Block Panchayats for the projects.

The Programme Officer made a presentation of revised proposals of Maharashtra to the Committee. The Committee observed that the area proposed for treatment is more than the rainfed area of the project in majority of the project proposals and the project sizes have not been split to form smaller projects as advised by the Committee in its 5th meeting. The Committee suggested that a clarification may be sought from the State Government on this issue for further consideration.

Thus the Committee, after examining the proposals, approved 119 no. of projects in Karnataka over an area of 491470 ha, 110 projects in Andhra Pradesh over an area of 473441 ha and 24 projects in Himachal Pradesh over an area of 203832 ha. However, the Committee recommended that the funds for 81 no. of projects in Karnataka over an area of 34199 ha, 103 projects in Andhra Pradesh over an area of 445844 ha and 10 projects in Himachal Pradesh over an area of 91885 ha may be sanctioned in the first instance. Remaining projects may be sanctioned after taking stock of demands received from other States.

Page 5 of 15

PROJECTS APPRAISED AND APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE – DoLR UNDER IWMP ON 22.09.2009

KARNATAKA (Area in ha, Rs. In Crores)

Recomm- Area ended Name of Weightage proposed Cost Total amount of Sl No. of Name of the District the for each for PIA per Ha Project CS No MWS Project project treatment (Rs.) cost towards (Ha.) 1st inst. (20%) 1 BAGALKOT IWMP - 1 95.50 5 3295.00 15000 4.94 0.89 2 BAGALKOT IWMP - 2 92.50 5 2596.00 15000 3.89 0.70 3 BAGALKOT IWMP - 3 92.50 10 5145.00 15000 7.72 1.39 4 BANGALORE RURAL IWMP- 1 128.00 11 4563.30 12000 5.48 0.99 5 BANGALORE RURAL IWMP- 2 122.50 12 4510.71 12000 5.41 0.97 6 BANGALORE RURAL IWMP- 3 105.00 6 3641.70 12000 4.37 0.79 7 BELGAUM IWMP - 1 106.00 6 3114.68 15000 4.67 0.84 8 BELGAUM IWMP - 2 106.00 8 3975.14 15000 5.96 1.07 9 BELGAUM IWMP - 3 117.50 5 2777.77 15000 4.17 0.75 10 BELLARY IWMP - 1 95.50 4 2646.88 15000 3.97 0.71 11 BELLARY IWMP - 2 108.50 4 2541.00 15000 3.81 0.69 12 BELLARY IWMP - 3 90.72 5 4200.00 15000 6.30 1.13 13 BELLARY IWMP - 4 104.20 7 3048.18 15000 4.57 0.82 14 BIDAR IWMP-1 112.50 9 5000.00 12000 6.00 1.08 15 BIDAR IWMP-2 112.50 9 5915.00 12000 7.10 1.28 16 BIDAR IWMP-3 113.00 10 5388.00 12000 6.47 1.16 17 BIDAR IWMP-4 112.50 9 4278.00 12000 5.13 0.92 18 BIJAPUR IWMP - 1 80.50 4 2654.75 15000 3.98 0.72 19 BIJAPUR IWMP - 2 80.50 4 2014.65 15000 3.02 0.54 20 BIJAPUR IWMP - 3 80.50 5 3015.35 15000 4.52 0.81 21 BIJAPUR IWMP - 4 80.50 8 4811.00 15000 7.22 1.30 Taluk Agriculture Office 22 CHAMRAJNAGARA IWMP - 1 120.00 10 5908.16 12000 7.09 1.28 23 CHAMRAJNAGARA IWMP - 2 120.00 10 5094.58 12000 6.11 1.10 24 CHAMRAJNAGARA IWMP - 3 135.00 12 5569.48 12000 6.68 1.20 25 CHIKKABALLAPUR IWMP- 1 106.88 14 5112.00 12000 6.13 1.10 26 CHIKKABALLAPUR IWMP- 2 105.00 12 5094.00 12000 6.11 1.10 27 CHIKKABALLAPUR IWMP- 3 123.75 10 4050.00 12000 4.86 0.87 28 CHIKKABALLAPUR IWMP- 4 102.50 19 3976.00 12000 4.77 0.86 29 CHIKMAGALUR IWMP - 1 95.00 10 5299.00 12000 6.36 1.14 30 CHIKMAGALUR IWMP - 2 92.00 10 5489.00 12000 6.59 1.19 31 CHITRADURGA IWMP - 1 117.50 7 4603.00 12000 5.52 0.99 32 CHITRADURGA IWMP - 2 100.00 7 4811.00 12000 5.77 1.04 33 CHITRADURGA IWMP - 3 112.00 4 2618.00 12000 3.14 0.57 34 CHITRADURGA IWMP - 4 125.00 6 4751.00 12000 5.70 1.03 35 DAKSHINA IWMP - 1 93.50 9 3997.00 KANNADA 15000 6.00 1.08

Page 6 of 15

Recomm- Area ended Name of Weightage proposed Cost Total amount of Sl No. of Name of the District the for each for PIA per Ha Project CS No MWS Project project treatment (Rs.) cost towards (Ha.) 1st inst. (20%) 36 DAKSHINA IWMP - 2 93.00 8 5031.00 KANNADA 12000 6.04 1.09 37 DAVANGERE IWMP- 1 103.30 10 5023.19 12000 6.03 1.09 38 DAVANGERE IWMP- 2 109.66 10 5072.69 12000 6.09 1.10 39 DAVANGERE IWMP- 3 109.66 11 5930.09 15000 8.90 1.60 40 DHARWAD IWMP - 1 110.00 7 4558.00 12000 5.47 0.98 41 DHARWAD IWMP - 2 133.00 8 5070.00 12000 6.08 1.10 42 GADAG IWMP- 1 90.00 13 5464.40 12000 6.56 1.18 43 GADAG IWMP- 2 130.00 11 4847.00 12000 5.82 1.05 44 GADAG IWMP- 3 103.00 12 5878.92 12000 7.05 1.27 45 GULBARGA IWMP - 1 80.00 10 5703.00 12000 6.84 1.23 46 GULBARGA IWMP - 2 55.00 4 2318.00 12000 2.78 0.50 47 GULBARGA IWMP - 3 75.30 5 2957.00 12000 3.55 0.64 48 HASSAN IWMP - 1 80.00 10 4978.50 12000 5.97 1.08 49 HASSAN IWMP - 2 77.50 5 3272.00 12000 3.93 0.71 50 HASSAN IWMP - 3 85.00 5 2717.83 12000 3.26 0.59 51 HASSAN IWMP - 4 75.00 6 3198.53 12000 3.84 0.69 52 HAVERI IWMP - 1 129.00 9 4191.00 12000 5.03 0.91 53 HAVERI IWMP - 2 105.00 5 2381.00 12000 2.86 0.51 54 HAVERI IWMP - 3 105.00 11 4959.00 12000 5.95 1.07 55 HAVERI IWMP - 4 123.00 10 4992.00 12000 5.99 1.08 56 KOLAR IWMP- 1 117.50 13 5465.00 12000 6.56 1.18 57 KOLAR IWMP- 2 127.50 10 4881.00 12000 5.86 1.05 58 KOLAR IWMP- 3 117.50 10 5035.00 12000 6.04 1.09

59 KOLAR IWMP- 4 135.00 8 4993.00 Taluk Agriculture Office 12000 5.99 1.08 60 KOLAR IWMP- 5 125.00 10 5275.66 12000 6.33 1.14 61 KOPPAL IWMP - 1 115.00 9 4790.00 15000 7.19 1.29 62 KOPPAL IWMP - 2 107.00 6 3514.00 12000 4.22 0.76 63 KOPPAL IWMP - 3 107.00 10 4587.00 15000 6.88 1.24 64 MANDYA IWMP - 1 128.00 10 5167.00 12000 6.20 1.12 65 MANDYA IWMP - 2 112.50 9 4657.00 12000 5.59 1.01 66 MYSORE IWMP - 1 92.50 6 3155.00 12000 3.79 0.68 67 MYSORE IWMP - 2 92.50 5 2450.00 12000 2.94 0.53 68 RAICHUR IWMP - 1 97.50 10 5240.00 12000 6.29 1.13 69 RAICHUR IWMP - 2 87.50 8 4370.00 15000 6.56 1.18 70 RAMNAGAR IWMP - 1 109.20 10 5830.00 12000 7.00 1.26 71 RAMNAGAR IWMP - 2 100.00 7 3695.00 12000 4.43 0.80 72 SHIMOGA IWMP - 1 118.00 9 4612.00 15000 6.92 1.25 73 SHIMOGA IWMP - 2 85.00 7 3824.00 15000 5.74 1.03 74 TUMKUR IWMP - 1 71.50 4 2700.98 12000 3.24 0.58 75 TUMKUR IWMP - 2 110.00 5 2426.87 12000 2.91 0.52 76 TUMKUR IWMP - 3 115.00 4 2452.86 12000 2.94 0.53 Page 7 of 15

Recomm- Area ended Name of Weightage proposed Cost Total amount of Sl No. of Name of the District the for each for PIA per Ha Project CS No MWS Project project treatment (Rs.) cost towards (Ha.) 1st inst. (20%) 77 TUMKUR IWMP - 4 127.00 4 2424.42 Taluk 12000 2.91 0.52 Agri. 78 TUMKUR IWMP - 5 125.00 5 2286.30 12000 2.74 0.49 Office 79 UDUPI IWMP - 1 93.00 8 4382.00 12000 5.26 0.95 80 UTTARAKANNADA IWMP- 1 87.50 13 5184.58 15000 7.78 1.40 81 UTTARAKANNADA IWMP- 2 130.50 11 4544.44 15000 6.82 1.23 Sub-Total (A) 667 341990.59 436.69 78.60

82 CHITRADURGA IWMP - 5 117.50 7 5116.00 Taluk 12000 6.14 1.11 Agri. 83 CHITRADURGA IWMP - 6 117.00 7 4278.00 12000 5.13 0.92 Office 84 BAGALKOT IWMP - 4 80.50 10 5953.00 15000 8.93 1.61 85 BELGAUM IWMP - 4 101.00 6 2827.25 15000 4.24 0.76 86 BELGAUM IWMP - 5 108.00 4 2748.77 15000 4.12 0.74 87 BELGAUM IWMP - 6 112.50 5 2700.25 12000 3.24 0.58 88 BELGAUM IWMP - 7 112.50 5 2639.50 12000 3.17 0.57 89 BELGAUM IWMP - 8 105.00 5 2581.70 15000 3.87 0.70 90 BELLARY IWMP - 5 89.47 10 3750.00 12000 4.50 0.81 91 BELLARY IWMP - 6 108.00 6 2300.00 12000 2.76 0.50 92 BIJAPUR IWMP - 5 80.50 10 5498.00 15000 8.25 1.48 93 CHIKKABALLAPUR IWMP- 5 82.50 13 5173.00 12000 6.21 1.12 94 DAVANGERE IWMP- 4 108.50 12 5434.33 12000 6.52 1.17 95 DAVANGERE IWMP- 5 102.50 10 4121.88 12000 4.95 0.89 96 DHARWAD IWMP - 3 100.00 8 4380.00 12000 5.26 0.95 97 DHARWAD IWMP - 4 100.00 3 1476.00 12000 1.77 0.32 98 GADAG IWMP- 4 110.00 9 4253.35 12000 5.10 0.92 99 GULBARGA IWMP - 4 74.00 8 4854.00 12000 5.82 1.05 100 GULBARGA IWMP - 5 69.00 6 3464.00 12000 4.16 0.75 101 GULBARGA IWMP - 6 87.00 11 5748.00 12000 6.90 1.24 102 KOPPAL IWMP - 4 107.00 9 5673.00 15000 8.51 1.53 103 HASSAN IWMP - 5 72.50 7 3326.15 12000 3.99 0.72 104 HAVERI IWMP - 5 102.00 15 5384.00 12000 6.46 1.16 105 MANDYA IWMP - 3 115.00 6 2826.00 12000 3.39 0.61 106 MYSORE IWMP - 3 92.50 10 5112.00 12000 6.13 1.10 107 MYSORE IWMP - 4 92.50 9 4966.00 12000 5.96 1.07 108 RAICHUR IWMP - 4 82.50 5 2850.00 15000 4.28 0.77 109 RAICHUR IWMP - 3 73.00 5 2950.00 12000 3.54 0.64 110 SHIMOGA IWMP - 6 102.50 9 4868.00 15000 7.30 1.31 111 SHIMOGA IWMP - 8 97.50 10 4854.00 15000 7.28 1.31 112 SHIMOGA IWMP - 7 105.50 8 4166.00 15000 6.25 1.12 113 SHIMOGA IWMP - 3 90.00 8 3545.00 15000 5.32 0.96 114 SHIMOGA IWMP - 4 115.00 3 1835.00 12000 2.20 0.40 115 SHIMOGA IWMP - 5 122.00 10 4687.00 15000 7.03 1.27

Page 8 of 15

Recomm- Area ended Name of Weightage proposed Cost Total amount of Sl No. of Name of the District the for each for PIA per Ha Project CS No MWS Project project treatment (Rs.) cost towards (Ha.) 1st inst. (20%) 116 TUMKUR IWMP - 6 102.00 4 2734.75 Taluk 12000 3.28 0.59 Agri. 117 TUMKUR IWMP - 8 95.00 6 2785.13 12000 3.34 0.60 Office 118 TUMKUR IWMP - 7 82.00 5 2481.27 12000 2.98 0.54 119 UTTARAKANNADA IWMP- 3 87.50 15 5138.64 15000 7.71 1.39 Sub-Total (B) 299 149479 195.99 35.28 Grand Total (A + B) 966 491470 632.68 113.88

ANDHRA PRADESH (Area in ha & Rs. In crores)

proposed Recommended Total Sl. Name of Weight- No. of for amount of CS Name of District PIA Project No. project age MWS treatment towards 1st Cost (ha) inst. (20%) 1 IWMP-I 62 9 4266 Mandal Praja Parishad,Asifabad. 5.12 0.92 Mandal Praja 2 IWMP-II 71 6 2751 3.30 0.59 Parishad,Bazarhatnur. 3 IWMP-III 80 6 3035 Mandal Praja Parishad,Jaipur. 3.64 0.66 4 IWMP-IV 66 10 4780 Mandal Praja Parishad,Kubeer. 5.74 1.03 ADILABAD 5 IWMP-V 74 9 4502 Mandal Praja Parishad, Narnoor. 5.40 0.97 6 IWMP-VI 69 6 2864 Mandal Praja Parishad ,Sirpur-T. 3.44 0.62 7 IWMP-VII 76 8 4092 Mandal Praja Parishad,Tiryani. 4.91 0.88 8 IWMP-VIII 74 9 4691 Mandal Praja Parishad,Tamsi. 5.63 1.01 9 IWMP-IX 71 10 5019 Mandal Praja Parishad,Utnoor. 6.02 1.08 10 IWMP-I 72 5 2584 Mandal Praja Parishad, Narpala 3.10 0.56 11 IWMP-II 86 8 4076 Mandal Praja Parishad, Tanakal 4.89 0.88 Mandal Praja Parishad, 12 IWMP-III 78 7 3669 4.40 0.79 Kanagunapalli 13 IWMP-IV 77 9 4568 Mandal Praja Parishad, Vajrakarur 5.48 0.99 14 IWMP-V 73 8 3927 Mandal Praja Parishad, Nallamada 4.71 0.85 15 IWMP-VI 72 8 4104 Mandal Praja Parishad, Rolla 4.92 0.89 16 IWMP-VII 70 10 4986 Mandal Praja Parishad, Gorantla 5.98 1.08 Mandal Praja Parishad, 17 IWMP-VIII 65 7 3709 4.45 0.80 ANANTAPUR Puttaparthi Mandal Praja Parishad, 18 IWMP-IX 70 10 4974 5.97 1.07 Peddapappuru 19 IWMP-X 72 5 2535 Mandal Praja Parishad, Atmakur 3.04 0.55 Mandal Praja Parishad, 20 IWMP-XI 70 9 4570 5.48 0.99 Kalyandurg 21 IWMP-XIII 66 10 4817 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kanekal 5.78 1.04 22 IWMP-XIV 72 7 3449 Mandal Praja Parishad, Gooty 4.14 0.74 23 IWMP-XV 65 5 2300 Mandal Praja Parishad, D.Hirehal 2.76 0.50 24 IWMP-XVI 60 10 4937 Mandal Praja Parishad, Settur 5.92 1.07

Page 9 of 15

proposed Recommended Total Sl. Name of Weight- No. of for amount of CS Name of District PIA Project No. project age MWS treatment towards 1st Cost (ha) inst. (20%) Mandal Praja Parishad, 25 IWMP-I 73 10 4978 5.97 1.08 Ramakuppam Mandal Praja Parishad, 26 IWMP-II 68 10 4977 5.97 1.08 Gurramkonda Mandal Praja Parishad, 27 IWMP-III 73 6 2610 3.13 0.56 Peddamandyam Mandal Praja Parishad, 28 IWMP-IV 73 9 4227 5.07 0.91 Chowdepalli CHITTOOR Mandal Praja Parishad, 29 IWMP-V 70 10 5041 6.05 1.09 Baireddipalli Mandal Praja Parishad, 30 IWMP-VI 69 7 3666 4.40 0.79 Yerravaripalem 31 IWMP-VII 83 9 4405 Mandal Praja Parishad, Punganur 5.29 0.95 Mandal Praja Parishad, 32 IWMP-VIII 75 10 4676 5.61 1.01 Madanapalle 33 IWMP-IX 77 7 3445 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kalikiri 4.13 0.74 34 IWMP-I 65.5 10 5000 Mandal Praja Parishad, Thondur 6.00 1.08 Mandal Praja Parishad, 35 IWMP-II 75.5 8 4000 4.80 0.86 Kamalapuram Mandal Praja Parishad, 36 IWMP-III 68.5 10 5000 6.00 1.08 37 IWMP-V 62.5 9 4500 Mandal Praja Parishad,Mylavaram 5.40 0.97 38 IWMP-VI 73.5 8 4000 Mandal Praja Parishad, C.K.Pet 4.80 0.86 39 IWMP-VII 76.5 8 4000 Mandal Praja Parishad, Veeraballi 4.80 0.86 Mandal Praja Parishad, 40 IWMP-I 64 10 5100 6.12 1.10 Mulakalapally KHAMMAM Mandal Praja Parishad 41 IWMP-II 75 10 4900 5.88 1.06 Kunavaram 42 IWMP-I 69.5 11 5673 Mandal Praja Parishad, Allagadda 6.81 1.23 43 IWMP-II 70.5 11 5364 Mandal Praja Parishad, Atmakur 6.44 1.16 Mandal Praja Parishad, 44 IWMP-III 75.5 11 5351 6.42 1.16 Bethamcherla 45 IWMP-V 69.5 10 5165 Mandal Praja Parishad, Halaharvi 6.20 1.12 Mandal Praja Parishad, Jupadu 46 IWMP-VI 73.5 10 5155 6.19 1.11 KURNOOL Bungalow 47 IWMP-VII 62.5 10 5004 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kosigi 6.00 1.08 48 IWMP-IX 72.5 11 5510 Mandal Praja Parishad, Orvakal 6.61 1.19 49 IWMP-X 74.5 6 2988 Mandal Praja Parishad, Owk 3.59 0.65 50 IWMP-XI 62.5 10 5090 Mandal Praja Parishad, Sanjamala 6.11 1.10 51 IWMP-XII 62.5 10 5113 Mandal Praja Parishad, Tuggali 6.14 1.10 52 IWMP-I 83 8 3750 Mandal Praja Parishad, Veldanda 4.50 0.81 Mandal Praja Parishad, 53 IWMP-II 74 8 3900 4.68 0.84 Talakondapally 54 IWMP-III 77 8 3867 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kondurg 4.64 0.84 55 MAHABUBNAGAR IWMP-IV 80 8 4200 Mandal Praja Parishad, Balanagar 5.04 0.91 Mandal Praja Parishad, 56 IWMP-V 79 7 3700 4.44 0.80 Thimmajipet 57 IWMP-VI 73 10 5244 Mandal Praja Parishad, Balmoor 6.29 1.13 58 IWMP-VII 75 8 3800 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kodair 4.56 0.82 Page 10 of 15

proposed Recommended Total Sl. Name of Weight- No. of for amount of CS Name of District PIA Project No. project age MWS treatment towards 1st Cost (ha) inst. (20%) 59 IWMP-VIII 87 8 3800 Mandal Praja Parishad, Koilkonda 4.56 0.82 60 IWMP-IX 62 7 3600 Mandal Praja Parishad, Itikyal 4.32 0.78 Mandal Praja Parishad, 61 IWMP-X 71 8 4100 4.92 0.89 Peddamandadi Mandal Praja Parishad, 62 IWMP-XI 66 7 3610 4.33 0.78 Damargidda Mandal Praja Parishad, 63 IWMP-XII 68 8 4100 4.92 0.89 Bomraspet 64 IWMP-XIII 63 10 5244 Mandal Praja Parishad, Ghattu 6.29 1.13 65 IWMP-XV 72 8 3850 Mandal Praja Parishad, Gopalpet 4.62 0.83 66 IWMP-XVI 69 7 3585 Mandal Praja Parishad, Narva 4.30 0.77 67 IWMP-II 71.5 10 5100 Mandal Praja Parishad, Regodu 6.12 1.10 68 MEDAK IWMP-III 65.5 11 5300 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kondapur 6.36 1.14 69 IWMP-IV 70.5 10 5200 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kangti 6.24 1.12 Mandal Praja Parishad, 70 IWMP-I 65.5 7 3700 Nalgonda 4.44 0.80 Mandal Praja Parishad, 71 IWMP-II 64.5 6 3000 Narayanpur 3.60 0.65 Mandal Praja Parishad, 72 IWMP-III 78.5 8 4100 Ramannapet 4.92 0.89 73 IWMP-IV 64.5 12 5900 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kattangur 7.08 1.27 74 NALGONDA IWMP-V 72.5 6 3200 Mandal Praja Parishad, Marriguda 3.84 0.69 Mandal Praja Parishad, 75 IWMP-VI 64.5 8 4000 Chandampet 4.80 0.86 76 IWMP-VII 84 4 2000 Mandal Praja Parishad, Penpahad 2.40 0.43 Mandal Praja Parishad, 77 IWMP-VIII 81 9 4400 Thungathurthy 5.28 0.95 78 IWMP-IX 79 8 4200 Mandal Praja Parishad, Gundala 5.04 0.91 Mandal Praja Parishad, 79 IWMP-I 69 11 5300 V.V.PALEM 6.36 1.14 80 IWMP-II 66 9 4600 Mandal Praja Parishad,ONGOLE 5.52 0.99 81 IWMP-III 77 12 5800 Mandal Praja Parishad,S.N.PADU 6.96 1.25 Mandal Praja Parishad, 82 IWMP-IV 79 10 5100 Pullalacheruvu 6.12 1.10 83 IWMP-V 73 11 5300 Mandal Praja Parishad, Marripudi 6.36 1.14 Mandal Praja Parishad, 84 PRAKASAM IWMP-VI 74 9 4700 GIDDALURU 5.64 1.02 85 IWMP-VII 67 7 3700 Mandal Praja Parishad, B.PETA 4.44 0.80 86 IWMP-VIII 81 10 4800 Mandal Praja Parishad, ADDANKI 5.76 1.04 87 IWMP-IX 80 9 4700 Mandal Praja Parishad, KANIGIRI 5.64 1.02 88 IWMP-X 69 10 4900 Mandal Praja Parishad,DORNALA 5.88 1.06 89 IWMP-XI 75 10 5000 Mandal Praja Parishad,H.M PADU 6.00 1.08 Mandal Praja Parishad, 90 IWMP-XII 73 10 4800 BALLIKURAVA 5.76 1.04

Page 11 of 15

proposed Recommended Total Sl. Name of Weight- No. of for amount of CS Name of District PIA Project No. project age MWS treatment towards 1st Cost (ha) inst. (20%) Mandal Praja 91 IWMP-XIII 75 9 4600 Parishad,MUNDLAMURU 5.52 0.99 Mandal Praja Parishad, 92 IWMP-XIV 78 9 4300 KURICHEDU 5.16 0.93 Mandal Praza Parishad, 93 IWMP-I 84.5 8 3876 Kandukur 4.65 0.84 Mandal Praza Parishad, 94 IWMP-II 71.5 8 3998 Shabad 4.80 0.86 Mandal Praza Parishad, 95 IWMP-III 67.5 8 3969 Peddemul 4.76 0.86 RANGA REDDY Mandal Praza Parishad, 96 IWMP-IV 79.5 8 4024 Yacharam 4.83 0.87 Mandal Praza Parishad, 97 IWMP-V 68.5 8 4224 Mominpet 5.07 0.91 98 IWMP-VI 79.5 8 4052 Mandal Praza Parishad, Gandeed 4.86 0.88 99 IWMP-VII 67.5 8 4000 Mandal Praza Parishad, Dharur 4.80 0.86 Mandal Praja Parishad, 100 IWMP-I 76 10 5007 Nandigam 6.01 1.08 101 IWMP-II 65 9 4476 Mandal Praja Parishad, Laveru 5.37 0.97 SRIKAKULAM 102 IWMP-III 63 6 2799 Mandal Praja Parishad, Mandasa 3.36 0.60 103 IWMP-IV 73 14 7226 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kanchili 8.67 1.56 Sub-Total (A) 892 445844 535.01 96.30 Mandal Praja Parishad, 104 KADAPA IWMP-IV 59.5 3 1500 1.80 0.32 Muddanur 105 KURNOOL IWMP-IV 61.5 11 5469 Mandal Praja Parishad, C-Belgal 6.56 1.18 106 KURNOOL IWMP-VIII 56.5 4 2080 Mandal Praja Parishad, Nandyal 2.50 0.45 Mandal Praja Parishad, 107 KURNOOL IWMP-XIII 54.5 10 5048 6.06 1.09 Yemmigannur Mandal Praja Parishad, 108 M.B.NAGAR IWMP-XIV 61 8 3800 4.56 0.82 Dhanwada Mandal Praja Parishad, 109 MEDAK IWMP-I 60.5 10 5100 6.12 1.10 Jharasangam 110 MEDAK IWMP-V 60.5 9 4600 Mandal Praja Parishad, Kalhere 5.52 0.99 Sub-Total (B) 55 27597 33.17 5.96 Grand Total (A+B) 947 473441 568.13 102.26

Page 12 of 15

HIMACHAL PRADESH (Area in ha, Rs. In Crores) Amount of Area central share Total project Sl. Average No. of proposed to towards 1st Name of Project Name of PIA cost No. weigh-tages MWS be treated installment (Rs. In crore) (ha) (20%) (Rs. In crore) 1 BILASPUR- I 89.5 7 8154 BDO 12.23 2.20 2 CHAMBA- I 100.5 32 20162 BDO 30.24 5.44 3 HAMIRPUR-I 88 4 2800 BDO 4.20 0.76 4 KANGRA-I 95 18 10991 BDO 16.49 2.97 5 KINNAUR-I 95 20 10000 BDO 15.00 2.70 6 KULLU-I 68.5 6 5983 BDO 8.97 1.62 7 MANDI-I 90.5 3 8046 BDO 12.07 2.17 8 SHIMLA-I 95 10 10543 BDO 15.81 2.85 9 SIRMOUR-I 77 9 7513 BDO/ Line Dept. 11.27 2.03 10 UNA-I 77.5 10 7693 BDO 11.54 2.08 Sub-Total (A) 119 91885 137.82 24.81 As advised by the Committee, the size of these projects may be reconstituted. Accordingly total no. of projects would increase for the same area. The names of PIAs are also subject to change. 11 KANGRA-II 95 25 10089 BDO 15.13 2.72 12 KANGRA-III 95 14 5777 BDO 8.67 1.56 13 HAMIRPUR-II 88 5 5000 BDO 7.50 1.35 14 MANDI-II 90.5 6 9419 BDO 14.13 2.54 15 MANDI-III 90.5 4 8486 BDO 12.73 2.29 16 MANDI-IV 90.5 4 6685 BDO 10.03 1.80 17 LAHAUL SPITI-II 86 10 5000 DDP, BDO 7.50 4.05 18 LAHUAL SPITI-I 86 10 5000 DDP, BDO 7.50 4.05 19 SHIMLA-II 95 10 14485 BDO 21.73 3.91 20 SHIMLA-III 95 11 9862 BDO 14.79 2.66 21 SIRMOUR-II 77 8 6036 BDO/ Line Dept. 9.05 1.63 22 SOLAN-I 54 3 7961 BDO 11.94 2.15 23 SOLAN-II 54 3 6977 BDO 10.47 1.88 24 SOLAN-III 54 4 11170 BDO 16.76 3.02 Sub-Total (A) 117 111947 167.93 35.61 As advised by the Committee, the size of these projects may be reconstituted. Accordingly total no. of projects would increase for the same area. The names of PIAs are also subject to change. Grand Total 236 203832 305.75 60.43

Page 13 of 15

STATEWISE SUMMARY OF PROJECTS APPRAISED & APPROVED BY THE STEERING COMMITTEE (Amount Rs. in Crores)

Projects approved Projects approved for release of funds in the 1st phase Date of 1st Amount of Total no. meeting of No. of installment Central Share State of Total project Total Steering Area (ha) proj- Area (ha) of Central recommended projects cost project cost Committee ects Share to be released approved (20%) (6%) 1st 1. Assam 57 220587 274.30 57 220587 274.30 49.38 14.81 meeting 2. Meghalaya 20 30000 45.00 20 30000 45.00 8.10 2.43 04.09.09 Sub-Total 77 250587 319.30 77 250587 319.30 57.48 17.24 2nd 3. Nagaland 22 105729 158.59 13 59343 89.01 16.02 4.80 meeting 4. Orissa 57 294589 353.51 43 222504 267.00 48.06 14.42 09.09.09 Sub-Total 79 400318 512.10 56 281847 356.02 64.08 19.22 3rd 5. Rajasthan 162 925599 1294.94 140 807739 1126.63 202.79 60.84 meeting 6. Uttarakhand 34 170000 246.00 10 50000 75.00 13.50 4.05 11.09.09 Sub-Total 196 1095599 1540.94 150 857739 1201.63 216.29 64.89 7. Gujarat 68 330486 431.14 68 330486 431.14 77.60 23.28 4th 8. Madhya meeting Pradesh 84 623381 748.06 74 546896 656.27 118.13 35.44 16.09.09 9. Punjab 6 35302 42.36 6 35302 42.36 7.63 2.39 Sub-Total 158 989169 1221.56 148 912684 1129.77 203.36 61.11 th 5 10. Chhattisgarh 29 151716 182.06 29 151716 182.06 32.7707 9.83 meeting 18.09.09 Sub-Total 29 151716 182.06 29 151716 182.06 32.7707 9.83 111. Andhra Pradesh 110 473441 568.13 103 445844 535.01 96.30 28.89 th 6 112. Himachal Meeting Pradesh 24 203832 305.75 10 91885 137.82 24.81 7.44 22.09.09 113. Karnataka 119 491470 632.68 75 340469 438.10 78.86 23.66 Sub-Total 253 1168743 1506.56 188 878198 1110.93 199.97 59.99 Cumulative total so far 792 4056132 5282.52 648 3332771 4299.72 773.9488 232.28

The meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the Chair.

*******

Page 14 of 15

Annexure-I

List of participants of the sixth meeting of the Steering Committee on Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) held on 22.09.2009 under the chairmanship of Secretary (LR) at NBO Building, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi.

1. Shri Chinmay Basu, Additional Secretary (LR), DoLR 2. Dr. K.S. Ramachandra, Technical Expert, NRAA, Ministry of Agri., GoI 3. Shri Shrikant Baldi, Principal Secretary (RD), Govt. of Himachal Pradesh 4. Smt. Krishna Tyagi, CCA, MoRD 5. Dr. D.K. Srivastav, Special Secretary (RD), Govt. of Jharkhand 6. Shri K. Vidyasagar, Special Commissioner (RD), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 7. Shri T.V. Bhavadas, Director (RD), Planning Commission 8. Dr. Ravi Chopra, Director, People’s Science Institute, Dehradun 9. Dr. Himanshu Kulkarni, Executive Director, ACWADAM, Pune 10. Prof. Ranvir Kumar, Senior Consultant, School of Agriculture, IGNOU, New Delhi 11. Smt. Archana Singh, DIGF, DoLR 12. Dr. C.P. Reddy, AC, DoLR 13. Shri Kishan Das, Joint Commissioner (RD), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 14. Dr. A. Rajanna, Director, Watershed Development Department, Govt. of Karnataka 15. Shri R.P. Singh, Director (Soil Conservation), Govt. of Jharkhand 16. Dr. Shantanu Bhatawdekar, Scientist-SG & OSD, ISRO, Bangaluru 17. Dr. S. Subramanian, Scientist ‘C’, Central ground Water Board, New Delhi 18. Shri Jiten Malagar, DO & PC, IWMP, SLNA, Govt. of Assam 19. Shri Shamsher Singh, Deputy Director (RD), Govt. of Himachal Pradesh 20. Dr. P.V. Veeraraju, Joint Director, Watershed Development Dept., Govt. of Karnataka. 21. Shri. Mukesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, IGNOU, New Delhi

Page 15 of 15