Reducing Urban Heat Islands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reducing Urban Heat Islands Heat Island Reduction Activities cross the United States, a diverse group of stakeholders, from government agen- cies to corporations, have advanced urban heat island reduction strategies—urban Aforestry, green and cool roofs, and cool pavements—to lower summertime tempera- tures and achieve many energy and environmental benefits. Typically heat island mitiga- tion is part of an energy, air quality, water, or sustainability effort,1 and activities range from voluntary initiatives, such as cool pavement demonstration projects, to policy actions, such as requiring cool roofs via building codes. Some communities have elected to imple- ment both voluntary and policy initiatives. These efforts can complement each other, and sometimes an initiative that begins as a voluntary activity becomes required over time. This chapter draws from the experience of many different groups and covers a range of initiatives to highlight a variety of urban heat island reduction activities around the coun- try. Examples for the following types of activities are included: t Demonstration projects t Incentive programs t Urban forestry programs t Weatherization t Outreach and education t Awards t Procurement t Resolutions t Tree and landscape ordinances t Comprehensive plans and design guidelines t Zoning codes t Green building standards t Building codes t Air quality standards. HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES – DRAFT 1 publicity needed to develop larger initia- tives, promote new technologies and help Heat Island Mitigation get them to market, and sometimes even Strategies encourage local economic development. (See the “Stimulating Local Economies and For more information on heat island Businesses” textbox.) reduction strategies, see the corre- sponding chapters of this compendium: Communities have found heat island dem- “Trees and Vegetation,” “Green Roofs,” onstration projects to be most effective “Cool Roofs,” and “Cool Pavements.” when they: t Target high-visibility projects. Focus- 1. Voluntary Efforts ing efforts on a prominent building or site helps attract attention to heat island Most community strategies to reduce heat mitigation efforts. islands have relied on voluntary efforts, which can generally be grouped into the t Measure benefits. Highlighting antici- following categories: pated benefits and collecting data on actual impacts provides useful informa- t Demonstration projects tion for planning future activities. These benefits also illustrate to others the t Incentive programs reasons and means to act. t Urban forestry programs t Convey lessons learned. Documenting t Weatherization how demonstration projects are con- t Outreach and education ducted makes them easier to replicate t Awards. and improve. Many groups choose to conduct just one kind of activity; others combine ap- proaches. For example, some utilities have Lead By Example focused on cool roof rebates to encourage consumers to install reflective roofing prod- “Lead by example” programs involve ucts. Some local environment departments implementing strategies within lo- have sponsored demonstration projects, cal and state government facilities, conducted outreach and education efforts operations, and fleets, where appro- to publicize results, and have provided priate. These programs offer energy, grants to support use of mitigation tech- environmental, and financial benefits nologies by residents and industry. while creating an important opportu- nity for governments to demonstrate 1.1 Demonstration Projects the economic feasibility of the strate- Local governments, universities, and other gies they are promoting. This lead- organizations have used projects to demon- ership can raise public awareness strate a specific heat island mitigation strat- of the benefits of urban heat island egy and quantify its benefits in a controlled reduction strategies, which can lead environment. Documenting the project to increased public and private sector and its results can provide the data and support for advancing them. 2 REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLANDS – DRAFT A variety of organizations can be the chief Figure 1: Chicago City Hall Green Roof agents of change and the first to test alter- native technologies, often in highly visible, public facilities. Demonstration projects have taken place in parks, schools, and mu- nicipal buildings like city hall. These proj- ects often also monitor costs and benefits, such as energy savings. Examples include: t Chicago installed a green roof on its city hall that includes 20,000 plants, shrubs, grasses, vines, and trees. The Katrin Barth-Scholz/Department of Energy city expects to save directly more than Chicago’s commitment to green roofs includes 9,270 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year of demonstration projects, such as on its City Hall, electricity and nearly 740 million British education, incentives, and policy actions. thermal units (Btu) per year of natural gas for heating. This energy savings translates into about $3,600 annually, and savings will increase with higher energy prices. In addition to assess- Stimulating Local ing energy impacts, the green roof has Economies and Businesses been designed to test different types of rooftop garden systems, success rates The non-profit group Sustainable of native and non-native vegetation, South Bronx has developed several and reductions in stormwater runoff. goals for the green roof/cool roof This city hall green roof has helped to demonstration project on top of its raise the visibility of green roofs and to office building in Hunts Point. These increase public understanding of them. goals include gathering research on Chicago’s Department of Environment local benefits, establishing a resource staff has frequently given presentations for the community, educating New about the roof, which has won numer- Yorkers on the value of green roofs, ous awards. For further information, go and advocating sustainable building to <http://egov.city ofchicago.org> and practices. The demonstration project look under the Department of Environ- has become a springboard for de- ment’s City Hall green roof project. veloping a local green and cool roof installation company to provide em- t A demonstration project for Tucson ployment opportunities in the South documented how a cool roof re- Bronx area. The group’s business is duced temperatures inside and on called SmartRoofs and includes a job- the roof of the building and saved training program for local residents. more than 400 million Btu annually See <www.ssbx.org/greenroofs. in energy. A white elastomeric coating html#> for more information. was installed over a 28,000-square foot (2,600 m2), unshaded metal roof on one of the city’s administration build- ings. Following the installation, energy savings were calculated at 50 to 65 HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES – DRAFT 3 percent of the building’s cooling ener- with an eastern, western, or south- gy—an avoided energy cost of nearly ern exposure that heats up during the $4,000 annually. See <www.swenergy. summer are eligible for this program. org/casestudies/arizona/tucson_topsc. SMUD provides trees between four htm> for more information. and seven feet tall (1.2-2.2 m), as well as stakes, ties, fertilizer, tree delivery, 1.2 Incentives and expert advice on tree selection Incentives have proven to be an effective and planting techniques free of charge. way to spur individual heat island reduc- Homeowners must agree to plant and tion actions. Incentives from governments, care for the trees. See <www.smud.org/ utilities, and other organizations can in- residential/trees/index.html> for more clude below-market loans, tax breaks, information. SMUD also offers rebates product rebates, grants, and giveaways. For to residential customers who use cool example: roofing technologies. The utility offers a 20-cent-per-square-foot (0.09 m2) rebate t Since 2006, Baltimore County’s Grow- to customers who own single-family, ing Home Campaign has provided multi-family, or mobile homes with flat $10 coupons to homeowners toward roofs and who install ENERGY STAR® the purchase of most trees at local cool roof products. nurseries. Each coupon represents $5 of t Af ter the success of its green roof dem- public funds and $5 of retail funds. In onstration project, Chicago established order to validate their coupons, hom- green and cool roof grant programs. eowners provide information including The green roof program cites the ability tree type and location planted, which of green roofs to “create energy savings allows the county to integrate the data for building,” “lower surrounding urban with future tree canopy studies. The heat temperatures,” and “reduce storm county began the program as an in- water runoff, improve water quality, and novative way to increase tree canopy create conditions for longer-lasting roof cover as part of its larger “Green Re- systems.” Similarly, the city recognizes naissance” forest conservation and sus- cool roofs “not only help reduce cooling tainability plan. In the first two months costs, but can also have a positive envi- of the program, 1,700 trees were plant- ronmental impact by reducing the urban ed. See <http://fpum.org/pdf/MD%20 heat island effect.” In 2005, its first year, managing_forest_resources.pdf> and the program supported 20 green roof <www.baltimorecountymd.gov/Agen- installation projects; in 2006, it helped cies/environment/growinghome/index. fund 40. In the fall of 2007, the city an- html> for further information. nounced that it was expanding the pro- t Since 1990, the Sacramento Mu- gram to include cool roofs and
Recommended publications
  • Urban Tree Risk Management: a Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation
    Urban Tree Risk Management: A Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area 1992 Folwell Ave. State and Private Forestry St. Paul, MN 55108 NA-TP-03-03 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). Urban Tree Risk Management: A Community Guide to Program Design and Implementation Coordinating Author Jill D. Pokorny Plant Pathologist USDA Forest Service Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry 1992 Folwell Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 NA-TP-03-03 i Acknowledgments Illustrator Kathy Widin Tom T. Dunlap Beth Petroske Julie Martinez President President Graphic Designer (former) Minneapolis, MN Plant Health Associates Canopy Tree Care Minnesota Department of Stillwater, MN Minneapolis, MN Natural Resources Production Editor Barbara McGuinness John Schwandt Tom Eiber Olin Phillips USDA Forest Service, USDA Forest Service Information Specialist Fire Section Manager Northeastern Research Coer d’Alene, ID Minnesota Department of Minnesota Department of Station Natural Resources Natural Resources Drew Todd State Urban Forestry Ed Hayes Mark Platta Reviewers: Coordinator Plant Health Specialist Plant Health Specialist The following people Ohio Department of Minnesota Department of Minnesota Department of generously provided Natural Resources Natural Resources Natural Resources suggestions and reviewed drafts of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Dallas 2021 Urban Forest Master Plan
    Dallas Urban Forest Master Plan 2021 A MESSAGE FROM TEXAS TREES It’s a simple fact that trees are good. It’s also a fact that trees in cities just don’t happen by chance, except the Trinity Forest. The reality that the City of Dallas has a natural forest, and a built urban forest is remarkable. But we’ve come to a crossroads; nurture and manage this resource - or lose it. Bulldozers, urban heat, pests, climate change, and a myriad of other maladies are affecting one of our most important natural resources—trees. And it’s up to us to come together, as a community, and have the will to consolidate efforts, both within the city and with external partners, to protect, expand, and manage our urban forest resource. It’s up to all of us to make trees a priority. The Dallas Urban Forest Master Plan sets forward a strategic and cohesive agenda to manage this “green infrastructure”. If centralized within the City, there can be a comprehensive cost-effective approach to aligning investments for a greater return while at the same time providing a roadmap for private partners to help reach the goals and objectives of a strategic urban forestry plan. The Texas Trees Foundation is here to help, as we’ve been since 1982, and we will continue to provide technical assistance, support, expertise, volunteers, and sponsors to help make Dallas cooler, greener and cleaner for our residents and to the visitors to this great city. Janette Monear, CEO & President // Texas Trees Foundation Texas Trees Foundation is pleased to lead the Urban Forest Master Plan with
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Owner's Manual Table of Contents for the Northeastern And
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry NA-FR-04-07 November 2008 TTreeree Owner’s Manual for the Northeastern and Midwestern United States www.treeownersmanual.info Tree Owner's Manual Table of Contents for the Northeastern and Midwestern United States Important Precautions ................................1 Model Information and Parts Diagram ........2 Deciduous Model..................................... .2 Authors: Evergreen Model...................................... 3 Jill R. Johnson, Forest Service Packaging ..................................................3 Roots .......................................................3 Gary R. Johnson, University of Minnesota Trunk and Branches .................................3 Maureen H. McDonough, Michigan State Pre-Installation (Preparing to Plant) ...........4 University Materials ................................................4 Lisa L. Burban, Forest Service Instructions .............................................4 Installation (Planting) .................................6 Janette K. Monear, Tree Trust Materials .................................................6 Instructions .............................................6 Illustrator: Maintenance Schedule ............................. 12 Maintenance Instructions ......................... 13 Jennifer Salveson Watering ................................................ 13 Installing a Trunk Guard ........................ 14 Technical Reviewers: Preventing and Correcting Katie Armstrong,
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Tech's Campus Tree Care Plan
    VIRGINIA TECH CAMPUS TREE CARE PLAN 2008 1. PURPOSE The purpose of the Virginia Tech campus tree care plan is to identify the policies, procedures, and practices that are used in establishing, protecting, maintaining, and removing trees on the Virginia Tech campus. The overall goal of the plan is to ensure a safe, attractive, and sustainable campus urban forest. The specific objectives of the plan are: Ensure proper species selection, high-quality nursery stock acquisition, and industry- consensus planting procedures Promote species diversity and proper age structure in the tree population Protect high-value campus trees during construction and renovation projects Promote tree health and safety by utilizing ISA‟s best management practices when maintaining campus trees Ensure that trees are reasonably replaced when there is mortality due to weather, pest infestations, injury, or construction displacement Encourage campus community members to respect and value the campus urban forest Note: This plan has been promulgated in partial fulfillment of Arbor Day Foundation‟s standards for Tree Campus USA designation and does not reflect official university policy on all matters. However, many of these policies, procedures, and practices are currently in place and administered. The Arboretum Committee is seeking to have the plan officially adopted by the university. 2. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Virginia Tech Grounds Department located within the Facilities Department under the direction of the Associate Vice President for Facilities. 3. CAMPUS TREE ADVISORY COMMITTEE The tree advisory committee is formally known as the Arboretum Committee. The committee is comprised of faculty and staff from numerous plant related programs throughout the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Forest Management Plan
    2014 Urban Forest Management Plan California State University Northridge 10/15/2014 Table of Contents Vision ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Mission .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Plan Synopsis ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Historical Overview ................................................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Overview ...................................................................................................................... 3 Current State of the CSUN Urban Forest .............................................................................................. 3 Purpose of the CSU Northridge Urban Forest Management Plan ............................................................ 3 Benefits of the CSU Northridge Urban Forest........................................................................................... 5 Heating and Cooling .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating More Effectively About Urban Forestry
    Communicating More Effectively about Urban Forestry Outreach and messaging strategies to motivate urban landowners to manage their trees and green space, based on Wisconsin survey findings Katy Thostenson, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Laura Witzling, University of Wisconsin-Madison Bret Shaw, University of Wisconsin-Madison & University of Wisconsin-Extension Tricia Gorby Knoot, University of Wisconsin-Extension ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is based on the Wisconsin Urban Landowner Survey, carried out by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in partnership with Emily Silver Huff and Brett Butler with the U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Program and the University of Wisconsin-Madison College of Agricultural and Life Sciences and University of Wisconsin-Extension. The survey was administered by the University of Wisconsin Survey Center. Contributors to the survey design included (alphabetical order) Morgan Grove, Don Kissinger, Laura Lorentz, Jeff Roe, Tracy Salisbury, Kim Sebastian, Nancy Sonti, Andy Stoltman, Brian Wahl, Darcy Widmayer and Olivia Witthun. Additional survey input was provided by Twink Jan-McMahon, Nathan Jones, Jordan Petchenik and Dwayne Sperber. Contributors to the final report included Dan Buckler, Ellen Clark, Jeff Roe and Chris Wirz. Final review was also provided by Marla Eddy, Mark Freberg, August Hoppe and Brian Pelot. Graphic design was provided by Elizabeth Rossi at the University of Wisconsin Environmental Resources Center. Funding for this work was provided by the U.S. Forest Service State and Private Forestry’s Urban and Community Forestry Core Funding Grant, as well as the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Title: Tree Care Steward About Us
    Position Title: Tree Care Steward About Us: The entire College Park campus is an arboretum, a collection of trees and plants maintained for scientific and educational study and public enjoyment. Our goals are: ● To display our campus landscape, forestry, plants, and natural heritage ● To educate our community and visitors about our campus’s natural environment ● To model the University of Maryland’s vision of a green university Steward Duties: Under the guidance of the Campus Arborist and other Arboretum staff, the Tree Care Stewards will help to maintain the newest additions to the campus tree canopy and ensure planting success by: Watering newly planted trees during times of low or no rainfall, as determined by Arboretum staff Weeding and maintaining mulch circles around the trees Inspecting trees for signs of damage or disease Assisting in tree planting events, at times directing volunteers in proper tree planting techniques Operating state vehicles, as needed Learning Objectives: By working closely with the staff of the Arboretum and Botanical Garden, the intern will gain experience in many aspects of landscape facility maintenance, sustainability, and environmental impact. The campus is a large and diverse environment with many different stakeholders, from students to professors to visitors to staff. The steward will learn skills in arboriculture, urban forestry, multi-tasking, trouble-shooting/problem-solving, adapting to different situations, researching, creating and maintaining inventories, communication, organization, time
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Care Before and After a Storm
    Tree Care Before and After a Storm Trees provide many benefits such as shade, reduced utility costs, and improved water and air quality. To provide those benefits safely, trees require proper maintenance and good care. A healthy, well-maintained tree is better able to with- stand weather events like ice storms, hurricanes, or strong winds that can cause some tree parts, or entire trees, to fail. After a storm, some homeowners are reluctant to replace downed trees, while others choose to remove trees regardless of how well the tree survived the storm. Tree damage and tree failures can cause property damage, but the possibility can be managed through proper mainte- nance. Prepare your trees to with- stand these events, to help to preserve the benefits you enjoy from having trees around your home. Know how to man- age storm damaged trees, to help re- tain or even regain those many bene- fits we all enjoy. BEFORE a STORM Trees with healthy root systems, good structure, and strong branching patterns tend to fare better during NO TOPPING! storms. Following these preventative practices can help maintain the benefits that trees provide. Roots need room to grow and provide stability to the tree. • Avoid cutting roots within a distance 5 times the diameter of the trunk • Do not smother roots under extra soil fill or excessive mulch • Do not kill roots by dumping chemicals or oil on the ground under the branches of a tree DON’T TOP! Topping will not make a tree more able to withstand a storm. In fact the very opposite is true.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Maintenance - 52 Things You Can Do for Your Urban Forest
    Tree Maintenance - 52 Things You Can Do for Your Urban Forest 1. Remove grass from area around tree trunk. 2. Do selective pruning. 3. Place mulch around the base of a tree. 4. Aerate the roots of a tree. 5. Plant a tree - right tree in the right place 6. Speak with and support your local municipal arborist. 7. Become a member or partner in your local urban forest program. Join a tree board or a forestry council. 8. Talk with elected officials about the value of trees. 9. Speak up in city council meetings regarding the management of trees. 10. Speak with your mayor about trees. 11. Learn what your community is doing for trees. 12. Take a walk and notice the trees. 13. Count the topped trees in your neighborhood. Spread the word about not topping. 14. Identify and protect heritage and landmark trees. 15. Look closely at city, county, state and school district budgets for hidden funds related to trees and landscaping. 16. Pick up garbage. 17. Talk about the importance of trees with your children. 18. Ask your children to explain the values that they see in our trees. 19. Sketch out the organizational structure of people who control community natural resources in your area. If you don't know, find out. 20. Identify one change in your lifestyle that will have a positive ecological impact. 21. Remind neighbors to remove tree stakes. 22. Find a small piece of land and give it back the ability to sustain many lives. 23. Use the Internet to see what bills are proposed for the state legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Care and Topping Beliefs, Knowledge, and Practices in Six Western U.S
    122 Kuhns and Reiter: Tree Care and Topping Beliefs Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 2009. 35(3): 122–128 Tree Care and Topping Beliefs, Knowledge, and Practices in Six Western U.S. Cities Michael R. Kuhns and Douglas K. Reiter Abstract. A survey of households was conducted in six cities in the interior western United States to determine homeowners’ knowledge of tree biology and tree care and their knowledge and practice of topping. Tree biology and tree care knowledge was low, depending on the specific subject, and few respondents had any formal training in tree care. Respondents’ topping knowledge was moderate to poor if they had topped trees before, regardless of whether they received a topping-related educational brochure. Those who had not previously topped trees were fairly knowledgeable and the brochure increased knowledge in some cases. Topping was fairly commonly practiced, even by those who cared about trees, and often was done for safety and to improve tree appearance and tree health. Amongst those who had topped trees, the survey explored who performed the topping, why it was done, and their satisfaction with the practice. Examples of ways the tree care industry and others may be contributing to misunderstanding, such as inconsistent practices, are discussed. Recommendations are made for changing knowledge and attitudes about tree care as well. Key Words. Planting; Pruning; Topping; Tree Care; Urban Forestry. Peoples’ knowledge of tree biology and tree care may affect wheth- et al. (2001) studied knowledge and attitudes about topping of er and how they care for their trees, whether they understand the trees in Illinois, finding that people generally did not understand need to hire an arborist to work with their trees, their perceptions the consequences of topping.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Paths in Arboriculture Tree Climber (Residential | Commercial) Tree Care
    Career Paths in Arboriculture Tree Climber (Residential | Commercial) J OB DESCRIPTION Tree Care C LIMBERS IN RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL tree care segments have as main duties pruning trees of vari- ous sizes and types, and identifying pruning needs. Climbers also must be skilled in removal techniques, cabling and bracing, and sometimes the installation of lightning protection. A climber must also be profi- cient with a chain saw and should possess all of the skills and training of a groundworker. T YPICAL BACKGROUND With few exceptions, climbers begin their careers in arboriculture as groundworkers. State Penn Commons; Flickr E LIGIBILITY REQUIREMENT Although not required, most climbers have a high school diploma. Many companies will require a Commer- cial Driver’s License (CDL). Climbers must be in excellent physical condition. E DUCATION/TRAINING NEEDS EDUCATION TRAINING MATERIALS Advanced chain saw use and felling An Illustrated Guide to Pruning (Gilman) techniques ANSI A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations Advanced climbing techniques and equipment (or applicable national standards) Back injury prevention ANSI Z133 Safety Standard for Arboricultural Basic knots and rope operation for rigging Operations (or applicable national standard) Basic tree biology Arborists’ Certification Study Guide (ISA) Beginning diagnostic training Arborists’ Knots for Climbing and Rigging DVD Cabling and bracing and Workbook (ISA) Chipper use and safety ArborMaster® Training Video Series (ISA) Electrical hazards training Best Management
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies: Trees
    Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies Trees and Vegetation Acknowledgements Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies describes the causes and impacts of summertime urban heat islands and promotes strategies for lowering temperatures in U.S. communities. This compendium was developed by the Climate Protection Partnership Division in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Atmospheric Programs. Eva Wong managed its overall development. Kathleen Hogan, Julie Rosenberg, and Andrea Denny provided editorial support. Numerous EPA staff in offices throughout the Agency contributed content and provided reviews. Subject area experts from other organizations around the United States and Canada also committed their time to provide technical feedback. Under contracts 68-W-02-029 and EP-C-06-003, Perrin Quarles Associates, Inc. provided technical and administrative support for the entire compendium, and Eastern Research Group, Inc. provided graphics and production services. PositvEnergy provided support in preparing the Trees and Vegetation, Cool Roofs, and UHI Activities chapters under contract PO #2W-0361-SATX. Experts who helped shape this chapter include: Ryan Bell, David Cole, Ben DeAngelo, Lynn Desaultes, Ed Dickerhoff, Maury Estes, Gordon Heisler, David Hitchcock, Kim Klunich, Cheryl Kollin, Megan Lewis, Julie Magee, Greg McPherson, Dave Nowak, Philip Rodbell, Joyce Rosenthal, Misha Sarkovich, Kathy Wolf, Jim Yarbrough, and Barry Zalph. Contents Trees and Vegetation . 1 1. How It Works .................................................................2
    [Show full text]