Heat Island Reduction Activities
cross the United States, a diverse group of stakeholders, from government agen- cies to corporations, have advanced urban heat island reduction strategies—urban Aforestry, green and cool roofs, and cool pavements—to lower summertime tempera- tures and achieve many energy and environmental benefits. Typically heat island mitiga- tion is part of an energy, air quality, water, or sustainability effort,1 and activities range from voluntary initiatives, such as cool pavement demonstration projects, to policy actions, such as requiring cool roofs via building codes. Some communities have elected to imple- ment both voluntary and policy initiatives. These efforts can complement each other, and sometimes an initiative that begins as a voluntary activity becomes required over time.
This chapter draws from the experience of many different groups and covers a range of initiatives to highlight a variety of urban heat island reduction activities around the coun- try. Examples for the following types of activities are included: t Demonstration projects t Incentive programs t Urban forestry programs t Weatherization t Outreach and education t Awards t Procurement t Resolutions t Tree and landscape ordinances t Comprehensive plans and design guidelines t Zoning codes t Green building standards t Building codes t Air quality standards.
HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES – DRAFT 1 publicity needed to develop larger initia- tives, promote new technologies and help Heat Island Mitigation get them to market, and sometimes even Strategies encourage local economic development. (See the “Stimulating Local Economies and For more information on heat island Businesses” textbox.) reduction strategies, see the corre- sponding chapters of this compendium: Communities have found heat island dem- “Trees and Vegetation,” “Green Roofs,” onstration projects to be most effective “Cool Roofs,” and “Cool Pavements.” when they: t Target high-visibility projects. Focus- 1. Voluntary Efforts ing efforts on a prominent building or site helps attract attention to heat island Most community strategies to reduce heat mitigation efforts. islands have relied on voluntary efforts, which can generally be grouped into the t Measure benefits. Highlighting antici- following categories: pated benefits and collecting data on actual impacts provides useful informa- t Demonstration projects tion for planning future activities. These benefits also illustrate to others the t Incentive programs reasons and means to act. t Urban forestry programs t Convey lessons learned. Documenting t Weatherization how demonstration projects are con- t Outreach and education ducted makes them easier to replicate t Awards. and improve.
Many groups choose to conduct just one kind of activity; others combine ap- proaches. For example, some utilities have Lead By Example focused on cool roof rebates to encourage consumers to install reflective roofing prod- “Lead by example” programs involve ucts. Some local environment departments implementing strategies within lo- have sponsored demonstration projects, cal and state government facilities, conducted outreach and education efforts operations, and fleets, where appro- to publicize results, and have provided priate. These programs offer energy, grants to support use of mitigation tech- environmental, and financial benefits nologies by residents and industry. while creating an important opportu- nity for governments to demonstrate 1.1 Demonstration Projects the economic feasibility of the strate- Local governments, universities, and other gies they are promoting. This lead- organizations have used projects to demon- ership can raise public awareness strate a specific heat island mitigation strat- of the benefits of urban heat island egy and quantify its benefits in a controlled reduction strategies, which can lead environment. Documenting the project to increased public and private sector and its results can provide the data and support for advancing them.
2 REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLANDS – DRAFT A variety of organizations can be the chief Figure 1: Chicago City Hall Green Roof agents of change and the first to test alter- native technologies, often in highly visible, public facilities. Demonstration projects have taken place in parks, schools, and mu- nicipal buildings like city hall. These proj- ects often also monitor costs and benefits, such as energy savings. Examples include: t Chicago installed a green roof on its city hall that includes 20,000 plants, shrubs, grasses, vines, and trees. The Katrin Barth-Scholz/Department of Energy city expects to save directly more than Chicago’s commitment to green roofs includes 9,270 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year of demonstration projects, such as on its City Hall, electricity and nearly 740 million British education, incentives, and policy actions. thermal units (Btu) per year of natural gas for heating. This energy savings translates into about $3,600 annually, and savings will increase with higher energy prices. In addition to assess- Stimulating Local ing energy impacts, the green roof has Economies and Businesses been designed to test different types of rooftop garden systems, success rates The non-profit group Sustainable of native and non-native vegetation, South Bronx has developed several and reductions in stormwater runoff. goals for the green roof/cool roof This city hall green roof has helped to demonstration project on top of its raise the visibility of green roofs and to office building in Hunts Point. These increase public understanding of them. goals include gathering research on Chicago’s Department of Environment local benefits, establishing a resource staff has frequently given presentations for the community, educating New about the roof, which has won numer- Yorkers on the value of green roofs, ous awards. For further information, go and advocating sustainable building to
HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES – DRAFT 3 percent of the building’s cooling ener- with an eastern, western, or south- gy—an avoided energy cost of nearly ern exposure that heats up during the $4,000 annually. See
4 REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLANDS – DRAFT t The Pennsylvania Department of analysis. The utility has been promoting Environmental Protection’s Energy cool roof products as a cost-effective Harvest Program has been providing and low-risk approach to reducing grants for specific energy saving proj- cooling loads and peak demand. As of ects since 2003. In 2007, it dispensed 2005, Austin Energy had awarded more more than $500,000 to green roof than $164,000 as rebates, represent- projects across the state. The Energy ing more than 1.5 million square feet Harvest Program overall aims to deploy (140,000 m2) of roof area and saving innovative technologies and encourages an estimated 1.25 million kWh of en- “proposals that are market-driven, create ergy. See
HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES – DRAFT 5 1991.3,4 As of early 2008, the Washington governments, foundations, trade asso- State legislature was working on several ciations, and private industry to restore bills that would support and expand local tree cover in the southeastern part of urban forestry efforts in recognition of how the state. TreeVitalize aims to plant urban trees and vegetation improve air more than 20,000 trees in approximate- quality, reduce temperatures, enhance qual- ly 40 neighborhoods in Bucks, Chester, ity of life, and reduce and filter stormwater Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadel- runoff.5 phia counties. The $8 million program targets neighborhoods in older cities, Frequently, urban afforestation focuses on boroughs, and townships in which tree low-income communities, where tree cover cover is below 25 percent. See
Tree Maintenance and Education
Many urban forestry programs explain that it is easy to plant trees but difficult to maintain them, particularly until they become well established. In order to ensure most trees survive, programs have enlisted and empowered volunteers to care for trees until they are established. Community participation is important because most urban trees are not under public jurisdiction.
Often tree planting programs train participants in proper tree planting techniques and care. In Pennsylvania, TreeVitalize provides nine hours of classroom and field training to community residents who want to become urban forestry leaders. The classes cover tree identification, planting, pruning, mulching, tree biology/physiol- ogy, proper species selection, community tree care, and proper pruning. Residents also can learn how to organize community-assisted tree planting projects. Graduates are eligible to participate in advanced training and other events.
Other programs require community members to pledge to maintain and protect the trees that are planted. For example, Los Angeles residents interested in free trees from the Trees for a Green LA program first participate in an online or neighborhood workshop. Then, they complete a site plan and apply for their free trees. Residents pledge on their applications to plant and care for the trees in a proper manner and allow the city to inspect their work for overall program evaluation and quality assur- ance. See
Please see the “Trees and Vegetation” chapter of this compendium for more informa- tion about urban forestry benefits and implementation considerations.
6 REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLANDS – DRAFT including tree planting at local schools and parks. The organization was instru- mental in getting Elizabeth involved in Heat Health—An New Jersey’s Cool Cities Initiative, which Opportunity to Advance aims to plant trees primarily in the large Heat Island Mitigation cities of New Jersey with low tree cover- age. See
HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION ACTIVITIES – DRAFT 7