Compiled Research Report.Docx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Compiled Research Report.Docx Research Report “Nobly Has That Little Band Worked”: The Mary Washington House (1890-2014) Exhibition planned by the students enrolled in the Museum Design and Interpretation Laboratory at the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, Virginia Students: Timothy Barr, Kaleigh Beverly, Kelsey Carter, Samuel Crystal, Ryan Donaldson, Anna Grotophorst, Caitlin McCafferty, Devin Netter, Jenniffer Powers, Candice Roland, Brian Sagedy, Megan Schloemer, Kelli Weir, Molly Woods Instructor: Prof. Cristina Turdean Spring 2014 Table of Contents Ball Correspondence 1 Meeting Minutes 2 Published Sources 3 Miscellaneous Records 4 Ball Correspondence Source: Letters from Philip Stern to George Ball Date: June 17, 1927 - November 17, 1928 Summary: This series of letters from Philip N. Stern to George A. Ball are in regards to Ball’s donations to the foundation of the new Mary Washington Hospital. It is outlined that if Ball adds another $750 to his previous $250 donation then he would have one of eleven “family tablets” inscribed and mounted within the hospital. Included in the letters is a sample of the family memorial tablets along with their approximate dimensions. Over the course of a few months, Stern repeatedly sends Ball letters as it seems that Ball never responded to the original letter. The last letter, dated November 7, 1928, is damaged and much is indecipherable. From what is decipherable, it seems as though Ball made another donation to and received a family tablet in the new Mary Washington Hospital building. Source: Letter Date: April 28, 1928 Summary: A letter thanking Mr. Ball for his “generous check” for the Mary Washington House. The letter also invites him to visit Fredericksburg. Source: Letter from Mrs. Braxton to George Ball Date: May 14, 1928 Summary: Mrs. Braxton thanks Mr. Ball first his gift, and informs him about the APVA’s efforts at the Mary Washington House. She also describes the restoration of the house, characterizing the process as a “room by room” restoration to its appearance in 1789. She again invites Mr. Ball to visit Fredericksburg, saying, “I hope you will come here and after seeing our work you will approve and be glad you have given. I believe you will.” Source: Letter, annual meeting minutes of the Kenmore Association Date: May 8, 1928 Summary: This document gave a detailed account of the meeting held by the Kenmore Association on May 8, 1928. It discussed the preservation of Kenmore and how the replica of the old office was complete. It also stated that the number of sponsors for the association had increased, and they were virtually out of debt because all of their projects had been paid for. There were many gifts listed that members of the association had donated to the association. It discussed the money they were making off of visitors and the restoration of the grounds that was planned to occur at Kenmore. They also briefly discussed a tea that was to occur at the Mary Washington house on May 9th. 1 Source: Receipt Date: May 17, 1928 Summary: This is a receipt for a donation to the Mary Washington House. “The Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities express their sincere appreciation of your interest and your generous contribution of $5,000 to the fund for the restoration of the home of Mary, the Mother of Washington.” It is dated May 17, 1928, and signed by Mary Byrd Scott Russell, Directress Fredericksburg Branch. Source: Letter from Governor’s office, Mr. Cammerer to Mr. Ball Date: September 18, 1928 Summary: The letter proposed a new national park in Virginia. The national park would be Blue Ridge only 90 miles from the capitol. He goes over the history and statistics of national parks and why they are needed. He is asking for Mr. Ball to make a donation to help secure this site. Source: Letter from Mr. Ball to Mr. Arno Cammerer Date: October 3, 1928 Summary: Mr. Ball approves of the plan to create the Shenandoah Park and plans to donate $5,000 to carry it out. Ball explains that he is a believer in giving citizens areas to enjoy the environment. Source: Letter from unnamed to George Ball Date: November 10, 1928 Summary: This letter sent to Mr. Ball states that the Citizens Guild of George Washington’s Boyhood Home is claiming to have given the money for the restoration of the Mary Washington House. However, Mr. Ball is the one who donated the money for the restoration of the house. The woman who wrote the letter feels the Guild is taking advantage of the Fredericksburg Branch because they are women. Source: Letter from Annie Fleming Smith to George Ball Date: December 1, 1928 Summary: This letter explains how Mary Washington House is under care of APVA (was purchased for prevention from Chicago’s World Fair). Annie F. Smith writes to Mr. Ball telling about fund raising and efforts put into Kenmore Association. It ends with telling him that she will attend Mrs. Ball’s dinner to discuss with him “suitable recognition” of his gift to the Mary Washington House for when it will be restored. 2 Source: Letter from Annie Fleming Smith to George Ball Date: December 5, 1928 Summary: Mr. Ball donated $5,000 for restorations and furnishings. Mr. Ball was unable to be at Mrs. Ball’s dinner to discuss recognition and Smith asked Ball to come to Fredericksburg for a visit. Source: Letter Date: December 19, 1928 Summary: This personal letter to Mr. George Ball is in response to a visit she had recently made to see him. She mentions her desire to show Fredericksburg and “our Historic Places” to him and his family. Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities to Mrs. and Mr. George Ball Date: April 15, 1929 Summary: In the letter, Mary Byrd Russell from the APVA is discussing the renovation of the Mary Washington House and the purchase of the Goodwin House. She offers to help with an event during Garden Week by offering the use of either the Mary Washington House or the Rising Sun Tavern. Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities to Mrs. and Mr. George Ball Date: Monday, April 22, 1929 Summary: In the letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the APVA, she thanks Mrs. Ball for the purchase of the Goodwin House and tells her that the architects having been working on renovation plans for the Mary Washington House. Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities to George Ball Date: May 5, 1929 Summary: The letter to Mr. Ball mentions taxes on properties in Virginia, and the APVA is exempt from property taxes. It also mentions Garden Week and some of the visitors who have visited recently, such as Franklin Roosevelt. 3 Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities to George Ball Date: May 22, 1929 Summary: Mrs. Russell is concerned about tax exemption for the Goodwin House, and spoke to Mrs. J. Taylor Ellyson, about the exemption. Mrs. Russell told Mr. Ball that she received his $5,000 check for the renovation and called him a fairy godmother. Philip Stern, the architect went to New York and spoke to a Mr. Cornelius about the house. Mr. Stern found that the two-story part of the house and the back of the house were not original. The APVA is proud to be conserving, not destroying the house. Source: Letter to George Ball Date: June 24, 1929 Summary: This letter thanks Mr. Ball for his letter and updates him on how the renovations are proceeding primarily that the back porch has been reopened. The letter once again invites him to come visit. Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities to George Ball Date: July 9, 1929 Summary: Mrs. Russell tells Mr. Ball that she received a check from someone for $37.50 and that the Goodwin House was rented. The Restoration Committee met recently and were pleased with the work that had been completed, and they were going to be able to afford asbestos shingles for the roof, which is confidential information. Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell of the Fredericksburg Branch of the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities to George Ball Date: July 30, 1929 Summary: This is an update on the restoration for Mr. Ball. The house will have to close soon to visitors to work on the roof and some of the rooms inside. The house will be closed during the summer, which is the most profitable time for the museum. 4 Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell to George Ball Date: August 28, 1929. Summary: The writer hopes to get the Garvan furniture in the Mary Washington House by next month. The writer also mentions that the APVA in Richmond must date all of the furniture before it is taken into the house. Source: Letter from Mary Byrd Russell to George Ball Date: October 11, 1929. Summary: Mrs. Russell tells Mr. Ball how much the entire branch of the APVA appreciates his donation to the Mary Washington House. Source: Letter to George Ball Date: October 11, 1929. Summary: This letter thanks Mr. Ball for his donation, which will help with the house’s restoration and with the custodian’s quarters. Source: Letter to George Ball Date: October 12, 1929 Summary: This letter informs Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Tidewater Telephone Company, Warsaw, VA, April 23, 1971
    OFFICE OF TELECOM MUI:;,,TIONS- POLiCY WASHINGTON Tom: We may not get a bill :for your helicopter pickup from Warsaw, Va. to Washington. However, this should be signed to cover -- in any event. Thanks. Eva STANDARD FOAM NO. 1012 TRAVEL VOUCHER 0:7 CdO 5300 1012-106 ..11.1••••••••••. DEPARTMENT, BUREAU, OR ESTABLISHMENT Exec. Office of the President VOUCHER NO. Office of Telecommunications Policy PAYEES NAME PAID BY Clay T. Whitehead SS# 509-34-3700 MAILING ADDRESS 2440 Virginia AV NW WA DC 20037 OFFICIAL DUTY STATION RESIDENCE Washington D. C. Washington, D. C. FOR TRAVEL AND OTHER EXPENSES TRAVEL ADVANCE CHECK NO. FROM (DATE) TO (DATE) Outstanding 4/23/71 4/23/71 CASH PAYMENT RECEIVED: APPLICABLE TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION(S) Amount to be applied (DATE) NO. DATE Balance to remain outstanding (SIGNATURE OF PAYEE) TRANSPORT/VI ION REQUESTS ISSUED AGENT'S INITIALS OF MODE, CLASS POINTS OF TRAVEL TRANSPORTATION CARRIER OF SERVICE, DATE REQUEST NUMBER VALUATION ISSUED OF TICKET ISSUING AND ACCONI- TICKET MODATIONS * FROM- TO- . • - _ ' ._ **Certified correct. Paiment or credit has not been received. ._ -- Dollars Cts July 9, 1971 1 031!:-*-- AMOUNT . CLAIMED (Date) (Signature of Payee) ---40. (Supervisory APPROVED and other approvals when required) DIFFERENCES: Admin. approved in accord. with , Para. 2. 1. b. of - SGTR. NEXT PREVIOUS VOUCHER PAID UNDER SME TRAVEL AUTHORITY VOUCHER NO. I D.O. SYMBOL , ) DATE (MONTH-YEAR) Total verified correct for charge to appropriation(s) Certified correct and proper for payment: - • • Applied tp travel (appropriation symbol) . ..• • . advance NET TO ...-.....40- (Date) (Authorized Certifying Officer) TRAVELER - ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION (Appropriation symbol must be shown; other classification optional) go.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomi Lewis Reneau (Part II) -- 12/14/2007
    Tomi Lewis Reneau (Part II) -- 12/14/2007 By Tina Mathews, CRRL Intern, editor Interviewed by Nancy Bruns We're once again in Tomi's kitchen.) Interviewer: Let's try to pick up where we left off - although we lost some recorded material when one of the transcribers tangled the tape. We ought to talk about your interest in family and genealogy which I know continued through the years you lived away. Tomi: Mother had given me a DAR membership for my 18th birthday. Interviewer: Just what you wanted. Tomi: Oh yes. I didn't want a car or a trip to Europe. I wanted a DAR membership. (Both are laughing) And I managed to totally ignore the DAR membership for years. Then when I was living in Florida a friend of mine, Judy Hawkins Barton, wrote or called and said she was the Regent of a new chapter that was forming. She asked me to switch to hers. Well of course I would. I don't know anything about the chapter where I was. So I joined and then over the years got to be registrar and then Regent. Interviewer: This is of a Florida chapter? Tomi: No, this is the Overwharton Parish Chapter in Stafford County. Interviewer: Can you tell me anything about the history of the Overwharton Parish chapter. Tomi: It was formed out of the chapter here ... the chapters just get too big. And others form. Interviewer: How many of them are here? Are there three? Tomi: It depends really on what you mean by here.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2016 Newsletter
    July 2016 Newsletter https://ui.constantcontact.com/visualeditor/visual_editor_preview.jsp?age... VISITING EXHIBITS & PROGRAMS NEWS RENTALS GIVING ABOUT THE MUSEUM COLLECTIONS July 2016 Newsletter In This Issue Spotlight Exhibit What's In Store? Featured Artifact Hail and Farewell Louisiana Purchase Treaty Bas -Relief Created by Austrian-born American sculptor Karl Bitter (December 6, 1867 - April 9, 1915), this bas-relief is a scale model of a Quick Links temporary panel displayed during the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair (dubbed the "Louisiana Purchase Exposition") . It depicts American diplomats James Monroe (standing at left) and Robert Our website Livingston (seated), and French treasurer Francis Barbe- Marbois , signing the Louisiana Purchase Treaty on May 4, Newsleer 1803. T he model also served as a template for a larger bronze Archive sculpture which now resides at the Missouri State Capitol in Jefferson City . Housed for years in a conference room in George Become a Friend Washington Hall on the UMW campus , the bas-relief returned to of JMM! the James Monroe Museum in 2015 after a carefully- choreographed moving process. It is now on display in the "Monroes in Paris" gallery. Find us on Social Media: Upcoming Events 1 of 5 11/2/2016 8:37 AM July 2016 Newsletter https://ui.constantcontact.com/visualeditor/visual_editor_preview.jsp?age... Fri, 1 July: First Friday History Trivia Night. Trivia, cash bar, light refreshments, & 50/50 raffle. 6-8 p.m. Free. Mon-Tue, 11-12 July: Major Monroe's History Camp. Two-day, hands on history camp for children ages 7-12. 9 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Bylaws Board of Regents James Monroe Law Office – Museum and Memorial Library
    BYLAWS BOARD OF REGENTS JAMES MONROE LAW OFFICE – MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL LIBRARY Article I – Name The Board shall be known officially as the “Board of Regents of the James Monroe Law Office – Museum and Memorial Library” (“Regents” or “Board of Regents” or “Board”). Article II – Sources of Authority The Board of Regents is established by Chapter 641 of the 1964 Acts of Assembly, which incorporates the terms of a Deed of Trust executed by the James Monroe Memorial Foundation (“JMMF”) to the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is subject to the Decree in the Circuit Court of Fredericksburg, Virginia, entered on January 1, 1982, in the case of The Rector and Visitors of Mary Washington College v. The James Monroe Memorial Foundation, et al. (“Court Decree”); and otherwise conducts itself under such authority as the Rector and Visitors of the University of Mary Washington (“BOV”) may, from time to time, resolve to delegate. Article III – Operating Name of the Museum The James Monroe Law Office-Museum and Memorial Library operates under the name, “James Monroe Museum and Memorial Library” (“Museum”). Article IV – Membership The Board of Regents shall consist of eighteen members, two of whom shall be the Rector and President of the University of Mary Washington (“UMW” or the “University”), and two of whom shall be the President and Secretary of JMMF. The remaining fourteen members of the Board of Regents are appointed by the Governor, with seven members appointed by the Governor from a list of names submitted by JMMF and the seven remaining members of the Board of Regents appointed by the Governor from a list of names submitted by UMW.
    [Show full text]
  • 68 the Lone Surviving Pier Table of the Bellangé Suite Served As a Major
    68 The lone surviving pier table of the Bellangé suite served as a major inspiration in the updated White House during Roosevelt’s administration, but it was not immediately restored nor set out for display. Fortunately, in 1929, Congress passed an act preventing the removal of objects from the White House, as had happened in several administrations, including Buchanan’s: “[p]rior to the (law), the Presidents could either give away their White House gifts, take them home with them, or sell them at public auction.”clxi Objects no longer actively used in the interiors were instead stored in the White House attic or in Fort Washington, Maryland—it is assumed that the Bellangé pier table went there following the 1902 restoration. The table’s removal from the White House erased its important rediscovery, thereby negating the Bellangé suite’s historical importance and rightful place in the White House. The Bellangé furniture, once employed as symbols of American triumph and achievement, was now, once again, cast away from the White House. The pier table, as the last remaining representative of the entire suite, fell subject to a dusty storage building outside of Washington for some time before it was put to use years later. The pier table’s discovery already acted as the driving force behind McKim’s design for the Blue Room, but it fulfilled another important role fifty years later. This lone object initiated the return of the surviving Bellangé examples after 144 years and thirty Presidents. 69 Chapter 5: Royal Treasures Years passed, and so too did Presidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Environment Presidential Ad Hoc Committee Final Report November 6, 2019
    Campus Environment Presidential Ad Hoc Committee Final Report November 6, 2019 Prepared for: Troy Paino President University of Mary Washington Prepared by: The Campus Environment Presidential Ad Hoc Committee Associate Professor Michael Spencer, Chair Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Campus History: ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Results and Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 27 Quantitative Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 27 Qualitative Assessment: ........................................................................................................................ 31 Emil Schnellock’s Murals: ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Updated Nomination
    NPS Fo~10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) 1 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATlONAP REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REG1'STRATIONFORM This form is for use in nominatingor requesting determinations for individualpropert~esand d~~trlcfs.See instruclions in How to Complete the Nafional Register of Historic Places ReqiPlBhon Form {Nat~onalReoater Brsll~tin16A). Complete each ltom by marking X in tkappropriate box or by entenng the lnformat~on requested. If any Item does not apply to the property bwng documented, enter "NIAfor "no! appl~cable.' For funetms, architectural class~ticalon,rnalenak, and areas ofsrgniffmnce enter only categories and subcategories from the c~slnretions Place add!t~onalentries and narrative Items on contrnuat~onsheets (NPS Form 10-900a) Use a typewr~ter."uordprocessor,or p om puler, to complete all nterns. ------------------------------------------------------------3----r-------------------c-----.----------------------------=====P===_I= T. Name of Propew ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I----------------I-----------------------------Y3----.-YP-CCL--- historfcname James Momoe Birthplace (updated nomination) other namestsite number Virq~niaDept. of Historic Resources: 096-0046:44WM0038 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1--1-11-~1_--------~~-------------------------------1-3-I-L---.c 2. Location -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&------------"---------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 464 635 IR 058 441 AUTHOR Lamolinara, Guy, Ed. TITLE The Library of Congress Information Bulletin, 2000. INSTITUTION Library of Congress, Washington, DC. ISSN ISSN-0041-7904 PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 480p. AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/. v PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Library of Congress Information Bulletin; v59 n1-12 2000 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC20 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Electronic Libraries; *Exhibits; *Library Collections; *Library Services; *National Libraries; World Wide Web IDENTIFIERS *Library of Congress ABSTRACT These 12 issues, representing one calendar year (2000) of "The Library of Congress Information Bulletin," contain information on Library of Congress new collections and program developments, lectures and readings, financial support and materials donations, budget, honors and awards, World Wide Web sites and digital collections, new publications, exhibits, and preservation. Cover stories include:(1) "The Art of Arthur Szyk: 'Artist for Freedom' Featured in Library Exhibition";(2) "The Year in Review: 1999 Marks Start of Bicentennial Celebration"; (3) "'A Whiz of a Wiz': New Library Exhibition on 'The Wizard of Oz' Opens"; (4) "The Many Faces of Thomas Jefferson: Father of the Library Subject of New Exhibition"; (5) Library of Congress bicentennial events; (6) "Thanks for the Memory: New Bob Hope Gallery Opens at Library"; (7) "Local Legacies: American Culture Captured in Bicentennial Program"; (8) "America at Work, School and Play: Web Films Document American Culture, 1894-1915"; (9) "Herblock's History Political Cartoon Exhibition Opens Oct. 17";(10) "Aaron Copland Centennial"; and (11)"Al Hirschfeld: Beyond Broadway: Exhibition of Work by Famed Graphic Artist Open." (Contains 91 references.) MES) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council
    CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL City Hall, 715 Princess Anne Street, Council Chambers Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 Tuesday, October 10, 2017 5:30 P.M. Second Floor, Room 218 CALL TO ORDER TOPICS • Visitors Center/Executive Plaza • Legislative Agenda • Dominion Power Easement Update ADJOURNMENT HON. MARY KATHERINE GREENLAW, MAYOR HON. WILLIAM C. WITHERS, JR., VICE -MAYOR , WARD TWO HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, AT-LARGE HON. MATTHEW J. KELLY, AT-LARGE HON. BRADFORD C. ELLIS, WARD ONE HON. TIMOTHY P. DUFFY, PH.D., WARD THREE HON. CHARLIE L. FRYE, JR., WARD FOUR CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA HON. MARY KATHERINE GREENLAW, MAYOR CITY COUNCIL HON. WILLIAM C. WITHERS, JR., VICE -MAYOR, WARD TWO HON. KERRY P. DEVINE, AT-LARGE HON. MATTHEW J. KELLY, AT-LARGE HON. BRADFORD C. ELLIS, WARD ONE HON. TIMOTHY P. DUFFY, PH.D., WARD THREE Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street HON. CHARLIE L. FRYE, JR., WARD FOUR Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401 October 10, 2017 7:30 p.m. Vice-Mayor William C. Withers, Presiding 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation Councilor Bradford C. Ellis 3. Pledge of Allegiance Vice-Mayor William C. Withers 4. Presentation 5. Public Hearings (5 minute rule applies to all public comment) A. Ordinance 17-__, First Read, Amending the Unified Development Ordinance for Land Within the Historic Fredericksburg District, to Remove the 50% Reduction of Residential Density when 25% or More of the Site is in the 100 Year Floodplain; and to Remove the 25% Reduction of Residential Density for Sites Containing 15% to 24% Floodplain 6. Comments from the Public City Council provides this opportunity each regular meeting for comments from citizens who have signed up to speak before the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredericksburg Planning Commission FROM
    MEMORANDUM TO: Fredericksburg Planning Commission FROM: Kathleen Dooley, City Attorney DATE: July 31, 2017 RE: Text amendment for wireless communications infrastructure Issue: Shall the Planning Commission recommend approval of changes to zoning regulations for wireless communications infrastructure? The amendments have been developed in response to three events: new legislation from the 2017 General Assembly, City Council’s Broadband Priority, and a franchise application from Mobilitie, a provider of wireless communications infrastructure. The zoning regulation amendments are part of a larger package of City Code amendments that are intended to provide the legal infrastructure for granting franchises to wireless communication infrastructure providers. The other ordinances address the role of City and Public Utility Review Committee (CPURC) and the Department of Public Works in administering these franchises. The draft ordinance package is posted on the City’s website with the City Council agenda packet for July 7, 2017. The legal landscape for broadband deployment is in flux. The Federal Communications Commission is considering changes to the classification of broadband as a “telecommunications service,” and the General Assembly is expected to consider additional changes in 2018. The current legislative proposals will not be the last time we visit this topic. 2017 07 31 Memo to Planning Commission Wireless Communications Infrastructure Page 2 Recommendation: The following amendments are required for compliance with the new state law: • Exempt micro-wireless facilities from zoning regulation (lines 44-46), • Establish a 60 day deadline for review of small cell facility collocation applications (lines 68-70), • Establish criteria for review of small cell facility collocation applications (lines 100- 113), and • Amend definitions (lines 133 – 180).
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Reconnaissance Survey, DJFB Segment
    ARCHITECTURAL RECONNAISSANCE Rͳ6 SURVEY, DJFB SEGMENT ΈSEGMENT 7Ή D.C. TO RICHMOND SOUTHEAST HIGH SPEED RAIL December 9, 2015 Architectural Reconnaisance Survey Dahlgren Junction to Fredericksburg (DJFB) Segment, City of Fredericksburg and Stafford County FINAL Architectural Reconnaissance Survey for the Washington, D.C. to Richmond, Virginia High Speed Rail Project Dahlgren Junction to Fredericksburg (DJFB) Segment, City of Fredericksburg and Stafford County by Heather Dollins Staton and Adriana Lesiuk Prepared for Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation 600 E. Main Street, Suite 2102 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Prepared by DC2RVA Project Team 801 E. Main Street, Suite 1000 Richmond, Virginia 23219 December 2015 December 9, 2015 Kerri S. Barile, Principal Investigator Date ABSTRACT Dovetail Cultural Resource Group (Dovetail), on behalf of the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT), conducted a reconnaissance-level architectural survey of the Dahlgren Junction to Fredericksburg (DJFB) segment of the Washington, D.C. to Richmond Southeast High Speed Rail (DC2RVA) project. The proposed Project is being completed under the auspice of the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) in conjunction with DRPT. Because of FRA’s involvement, the undertaking is required to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The project is being completed as Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) File Review #2014-0666. The DC2RVA corridor is divided into 20 segments; this document includes background data that will place each recorded resource within context and the results of fieldwork and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) evaluations for all architectural resources identified in the Dahlgren Junction to Fredericksburg segment only.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form FREDERICKSBURG HISTORIC DISTRICT EXTENSION, FREDERICKSBURG, VA Continuation Sheet #4 Item Number 8 Page 1
    -St~>!c prcsellt corporate limits of Frcdericiisb~rginclcde many arcliitccturaliy intcrcsting structures such as Broinptoil and Kcnmoi-e ir. 211c west nnc central s2s ti(1rls of tlle city, respective?y. The highcst csr.cec;ratiijr: of s;:n<:icant structures, however, is located in a forty bloclc sres that r~zs-lo-2 the T,.e S t bank of the Rappahannock, 2nd north of IIazz: Xcz. T;7e t~2o~r;:~y o: this area of Fredericksburg reaches its hizhest ?olnc in s te:: block area in the western center of the zone; the slo?es are reiativeiy gentlc tow; I the east, south. and north of this area conpared to the stee? dro? Corrr. to the river below Sophia Street. Five streets run prallcl to 25.e rivzr: I Sophia Street, Caroline Street, Princess k.-.e Street (Route 2), C:?;.rles I Street and Prince Edward Street. The southern qunrterof the dis:rict is cut off from the'remirider by'the-elevated R.F. adP.R.R. tracic. .. -. The Preservation-Zone contains a complete variety of fiinctio-s havizg as it does the commercial dohtown area of the city, tit* city hall, several the train station and the city's oldest residential areas. Gf all streets, Caroline Street has the most contrasts in stree; iesiga. 5s bloclcs between Lafayette Boulevard (Route 1) ar,d Pseiia Srrset are almost totally com,ercial but include two-and-three-story early-and century buildings, esprcia1:y on the east side of the 700 S1oc:cs. %~ese structures are painted and the first floor facsdcs are altered,hut the Letailing around the wir.dows, the brick work ad the gable roofs reveal their1 'I age.
    [Show full text]