Planning Perspectives, 20 (April 2005) 147–175 Between brotherhood and bureaucracy: Joseph Hudnut, Louis I. Kahn and the American Society of Planners and Architects ANDREW M. SHANKEN* Architecture Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1800, USA (e-mail:
[email protected]) TaylorRPPE103161.sgm10.1080/02665430500031787Planning0266-5433Original2005202000000AprilAndrewShankenArchitecture and& Article PerspectivesFrancis (print)/1466-4518Francis DepartmentUniversity2005 Group Ltd Ltd (online) of California, Berkeley232 Wurster HallBerkeleyCA 94720–
[email protected] This article details the formation and demise of the American Society of Planners and Architects, the first serious attempt to organize modern architects in the United States and a failed attempt to usurp the domain of planning from planners. The ASPA formed around Joseph Hudnut in 1943 as a vehicle for post-war planning and as an alternative to the American Institute of Architects, and dissolved in 1948 as the building boom made theoretical experiments in planning superfluous. The essay explains its failure in terms of shifting paradigms of professionalization in architecture. Introduction Shortly after World War II, Louis I. Kahn sketched out his ideas for ‘American Village’, a 1500-unit housing project intended to compete with speculative builders in the post-war housing market [1]. Kahn’s mock pamphlet presents a bit of a mystery: a project tinted with New Deal idealism, yet presented in a forthrightly promotional form and drawn up after the war, as the rise of the military–industrial complex led to what Alan Brinkley has called the ‘end of reform’ [2]. Post-war realities tripped a loud alarm on wartime dreams. A conserva- tive ‘return to normality’, the emergence of Levitt-style mass housing and high levels of production and employment kept liberal reveries of social reform from lingering after the war.