Gladman Developments Ltd

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council

Statement of Community Involvement

January 2016

Gladman consider all correspondence received and our response to the issues raised will be set out in a Statement of Community Involvement (SCI). As part of a planning application, Gladman submit to the Local Planning Authority a complete copy of all correspondence received (including any details such as your name, address and email where you have provided them). This ensures all your comments are available to the Council during the consideration of an application and shows who we have consulted. As the SCI forms part of the formal application documents, the Council may publish it online, subject to their own Data Protection policies. Should the application be the subject of an appeal, the same information will be forwarded to the Planning Inspectorate. If further consultation is carried out as part of the planning process, Gladman may use your details to make you aware of this and to ask for your views, but will not use this information for any other purpose.

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION ...... 5 Purpose ...... 5 Context ...... 5 Gladman’s Approach ...... 5 Engagement with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and Stakeholders...... 6 Engagement with other Local Stakeholders ...... 6 Engagement with the Local Community ...... 7 Initial Consultation Leaflet ...... 7 Press Advertisement ...... 7 Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Parish Council ...... 7 Your‐views Website ...... 7 Community Consultation Event ...... 7 Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Ward Councillors ...... 8

2 CONSULTATION REVIEW ...... 8 Consultation Outcomes...... 8 Summary of Comments and Responses ...... 9 Potential for Community Benefits ...... 13 Proposals Review ...... 14

3

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

1 Introduction

Purpose 1.1.1 This statement sets out the process of community engagement that has been undertaken by Gladman Developments Ltd (GDL) to inform a planning application for residential development on land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐ Loddon.

Context 1.2.1 The Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) was adopted on 19th July 2007 and sets out who, when and how members of the public can get involved in the planning process, and how they can find out about a decision. In addition, applicants or their agents are encouraged to approach and include the local community to discuss development proposals before an application is made.

1.2.2 This adopted SCI encourages early developer engagement. The adopted SCI encourages:

“…developers to undertake consultation prior to submission of a planning application, including methods such as a public exhibition or meeting or discussions with the parish council”

1.2.3 It further clarifies:

“…developers are not statutorily required to undertake this consultation, officers encourage them to do so, highlighting the benefits that this can achieve”

Gladman’s Approach 1.3.1 Gladman take a proactive approach to pre‐application consultation and engagement with Councils, statutory bodies and local communities in order to fully understand and consider relevant planning factors which could influence the nature or approach to the proposed development.

5

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

1.3.2 Having considered Basingstoke and Dean Borough Council’s SCI, GDL have completed a comprehensive programme of community engagement which is considered appropriate for the proposed development on this site.

1.3.3 This report details the programme and results of the consultation, meeting the requirement to submit such a document as part of a planning application.

Engagement with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and Stakeholders 1.4.1 GDL met with Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council’s Senior Planning Officer Brian Conlon to discuss the proposals. Consultation sent and received and the meeting agenda is shown at Appendix A.

1.4.2 The applicant has engaged other statutory consultees to discuss key issues raised during the consultation process.

Engagement with other Local Stakeholders 1.5.1 GDL both directly and through consultants has proactively engaged with other stakeholders during the pre‐application stage including:

 Highway Authority

 Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Parish Council

 Ward Councillors

 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council

 Hampshire County Council

 Existing residents

 Environment Agency

 Natural England

 Utility Providers

6

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Engagement with the Local Community

Initial Consultation Leaflet 1.6.1 Leaflets outlining the development principles and seeking comments were distributed on Friday 4th December 2015 to just over 200 households & businesses within the proximity of the site. A copy of the leaflet is included at Appendix B.

Press Advertisement 1.6.2 A Press Advert was published in the Basingstoke Gazette on 10th December 2015 and the artwork for this is included in Appendix C.

Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Parish Council 1.6.3 GDL’s development team sent the consultation leaflet and a letter offering to attend a private meeting with the Parish Council.

1.6.4 The Parish Council arranged and invited GDL to a public meeting which was declined and a further offer of a private meeting was made.

1.6.5 Copies of correspondence is included in Appendix D.

Your‐views Website 1.6.6 GDL has a dedicated website for each of its projects. These contain details of the project, copies of the display boards and other information about the particular scheme. The website also allows feedback to be sent via email to GDL. The Sherfield‐on‐Loddon website is www.your‐views.co.uk/sherfield‐on‐loddon and was operational from 3rd December 2015 to coincide with the distribution of the leaflet. The Consultation Boards that are displayed on the dedicated website can be found in Appendix E.

Community Consultation Event 1.6.7 GDL previously supplemented the consultation procedure with a public meeting displaying the development proposals on a series of exhibition boards. The events were typically attended by 3 or 4 of our planning team to engage and answer questions from the public, with an opportunity to leave comments at the end.

1.6.8 Over the last 18 months, however, this forum of consultation has progressively become less informative and a trend towards aggressive, vocal and adversarial engagement has been experienced. After great consideration it has been decided

7

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

that in future GDL’s public consultation process will not generally include a public meeting attended by members of staff. As a result, Gladman are unable to agree to attend public meetings and a public meeting has not been held for the purposes of informing the planning application. Our consultation instead draws upon alternative methods as stipulated above which allows residents who generally want to talk about their aspirations to engage meaningfully with the process.

Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Ward Councillors 1.6.9 A letter enclosing the consultation leaflet was sent to each of the Ward Councillors prior to the consultation commencing. A copy of these letters is included at Appendix F.

2 Consultation Review

Consultation Outcomes 2.1.1 At the time of writing this report 191 responses have been received. One person sent in 5 of these responses with another 3 people submitting 2 responses each. Responses from numerous people within the same households were also received. The comments are all against development with 63% not giving any reason for their objection. Only two respondents have suggested any considerations to improve the scheme.

2.1.2 A copy of the feedback received is included at Appendix G.

8

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Summary of Comments and Responses 2.2.1 Responses to issues which emerged from the various forms of community engagement are detailed in the table below, together with the applicant’s response.

Summary of Comments Response

Impact on Area The village cannot cope with an additional 215 homes The proposals are for up to 95 houses, it is presumed the figure of 215 relates to something else

Village does not need another 95 houses In order to deliver the level of housing that is Too many houses are being built in the surrounding required across Basingstoke and Deane, Sherfield- area on-Loddon will be required to accommodate Build somewhere else, preferably far away from here additional growth. There is already committed development in Bramley

This will turn the village into a town The proposals are, we believe, a measured and proportionate response to the site, providing high quality housing.

Site Location Issues This site and these proposals are not as identified in Our Planners keep a close eye on relevant the local plan planning applications within Sherfield-on-Loddon Site is in the proposed strategic gap and the District as a whole to remain up-to-date on local and District wide developments.

Farmland should be protected from development In order to deliver the level of housing that is Use brownfield sites required across Basingstoke and Deane, some Site is greenfield and agricultural land greenfield and/or agricultural land sites will be required to accommodate the identified growth.

Don’t build in a conservation area The development proposals lie outside the conservation area and careful consideration has been given to the listed buildings that are present in the immediate vicinity of the site to avoid adverse impact

Development would badly impact key views and We believe the proposals have responded where landscapes practicable to existing views and vistas. A more detailed analysis of this response can be found in the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment supporting our application.

Reduces gap between Sherfield-on-Loddon and The proposal forms a logical extension to Bramley Sherfield-on-Loddon and is well related to the existing settlement without leading to a merging with Bramley.

9

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Affordable Housing I bought my own property for £225,000 so this is Further discussion about the definition, function affordable. Existing properties range from £250 to and provision of affordable housing can be found £300,000 in the submitted documents such as the Socio- Economic Sustainability Statement, Sustainability Assessment and the Affordable Housing Statement.

The 40% affordable housing level can’t be guaranteed The Core Strategy for Basingstoke and Deane Should be delivered through Sentinel Housing Borough Council requires the provision of 40% affordable housing for this site. Sentinel Housing will be a joint-names applicant to ensure the delivery of the 40% affordable housing on this scheme.

Will the new properties be offered to local people first This is not intended. There may be the possibility before they go on general sale? to offer the social rented properties to persons with a local tie for an agreed period but this would be through negotiation with the Council.

Highways Existing traffic through the village is already high It has been concluded, as part of the Transport Additional traffic generation will cause problems Assessment that will accompany our application, There has been accidents in the area that the proposed development would not have a severe impact on the operation of the highway network, in terms of safety or capacity.

Consider an alternative access point Consideration for access into the site has evaluated all feasible options and the access proposed is the only deliverable solution available at present. We will continue to work with the Highways Authority and review any other options as they become available through the process.

Speed restriction measures should be implemented We will continue to work with Highways to achieve this proposal should they determine this necessary.

Parking will be an issue We will be working with the Highways Authority to Provide more space for car parking within the provide car parking within the scheme in development scheme accordance with their requirements. Additionally the proposal replaces the rented garage stock that will be lost when forming the new access from Bow Drive.

Explain how cycling is a feasible method of transport The whole of Sherfield-on-Loddon is located within a 5km catchment area of the site and therefore cycling to and from the village is practical. Chineham, Bramley, Hartley Wespall and Turgis Green are also all situated within the 5km catchment area, allowing access to other schools, employment, retail and local amenities. Whilst there are no cycle routes currently in the vicinity of the site, the topography of the surrounding roads make them generally conducive to cycling. These provide connections

10

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

for cyclists from the development site to the wider area in particularly providing an opportunity for linked trips to Bramley train station and for leisure trips.

Ecology/Biodiversity This field is a bat hunting ground and they are We recognise the importance of maintaining and protected by law enhancing ecological values on site and have had regard for habitat territories within the Development Framework Plan. More information with regards to this can be found in the Ecological Appraisal.

Facilities/Services Existing facilities (school, doctors, shops, etc.) are We are currently in discussion with the various struggling to cope already organisations to discuss capacity or shortfall within the local schools and doctors. If there is a need for further capacity at any of the local services then contributions will be provided as part of a S106 agreement. It is envisaged that additional spending within local businesses will enable them to offer a larger range of services to new and existing customers.

Increased spending in the village will be good for the local businesses

The village has every facility needed

Drainage/Other services The area is prone to flooding and this development is in The development lies outside of any fluvial flood an area of medium and high flood risk risk areas, holding a Flood Zone 1 (low risk) Developing on a site not in a flood plain is common classification. sense The northern footpaths will flood

The sewers will not be able to cope and are privately Careful consideration of the impact of storm water owned on surrounding areas is taken at all stages of the The drainage in the village has flooded more than once design process. To comply with statutory in last 8 years requirements surface water storage is provided on site to contain the run-off from a 1 in 100 year storm event plus 20% to cater for climate change. Foul flows from the development are not likely to enter the existing public sewerage network until late 2017. This allows more than two years for the Sewerage Undertaker to monitor additional development which will drain to the same sewer network and sewage treatment works and if necessary, carry out any improvements which may be required to ensure the cumulative foul flows from all development in this area can be accommodated in both the short and longer terms. The above timescales afford sufficient time to the Sewerage Undertaker to ensure it can continue to

11

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

manage its sewerage network and sewage treatment works (if required), to accommodate new development in this area. The Sewerage Undertaker has a duty to carry out such actions under its statutory duties and it is funded to do so.

Adverse impact on air quality An Air Quality screening has been carried out and no further work has been identified at this stage. However, during the planning process we will work closely with the Local Authority and if further work is required this will be discussed and agreed prior to the application being determined.

Design Provide a good depth of tree screening between this The proposals are, we believe, a measured and site and the existing housing proportionate response to the site, providing high quality housing that is integrated into the existing built environment.

Don’t build three-storey town houses The maximum height of dwelling will be two-and- a-half storeys (ie room in the roof) in this location, with the majority being either one or two-storey.

Reduce some of the southern buffer and build The buffers have been provided to safeguard and bungalows avoid adverse impact to the conservation area, listed buildings and wider countryside. The identification of housing types in this outline planning application is indicative and a reserved matters planning application at a later stage will be used to determine the exact housing mix which is indicative of the housing market at that time.

Consider opening the development close to Carpenters Links to wider existing dog-walking facilities would Farmhouse to allow linkage to existing dog-walking be a good idea but the protection of areas listed in paths the response above is a material consideration. This can be investigated further through a reserved matters application.

Proposed landscape buffer and public open space is a good idea

Footpaths should be constructed to bridleway This will be taken forward. standards

'Masterplan'? Are you intending on building a Death This isn’t part of our proposals for this site. GDL is Star? looking to submit an outline application for residential development. We believe a death star would require an application for employment and/or industrial use, which this application isn’t. We’re also uncertain of the exact size of land required for this purpose as the original death star is believed to have had a diameter of over 120 kilometres, with the second believed to be over 160 kilometres. Our site is only 6.7 Hectares therefore it wouldn’t fit nor would it serve its purpose as a standalone weapon of science fiction.

12

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

General/Other You/The land owner is just looking at the profit from This is not a material consideration in the planning land sale process

Crime levels will increase The site will go through a rigorous design process and will take into account Designing Out Crime guidelines.

Why have you scheduled a meeting on 23rd December? We are not aware of a meeting scheduled for this date and have not had anything to do with the organisation of this meeting.

Why does the consultation period end over Christmas? The consultation period is not due to conclude over the Christmas period and will remain open until the day the application is submitted. Further opportunity to comment on the proposals is also available through the planning process directly to the Local Planning Authority.

Consultation is only being done because you have to Consultation is recommended by each Local Authority but is not an obligation. We carry out detailed consultation in order to better inform our proposals and in an attempt to incorporate any feasible proposals for the benefit of the communities we are representing.

In order to be both cost effective and reduce your Unfortunately your suggestion is not a recognised carbon footprint, I strongly recommend constructing construction technology and mortgagees would your buildings from either straw or sticks. Two of the likely struggle to secure the necessary finance on Three Little Pigs used both of these natural recyclable this type of non-traditional construction. However, resources, and we all know that it worked out pretty it is intended to utilise sustainable building great for them! techniques and technologies of a suitable type.

I also have the support of Luke Skywalker and James There will still be the opportunity for Bond, who know a thing or two about dealing with representations to be made to the planning 'masterplan's. I will not hesitate to contact them or my authority during the consultation process once the good friend Liam Neeson, who's particular set of protest application is submitted. This can either be done skills which make him a nightmare for people like by email, written representation, telephone or you Luke Skywalker may use The Force.

Potential for Community Benefits 2.3.1 Throughout the consultation process, Gladman encouraged suggestions as to how the local community could benefit from the proposed development.

2.3.2 Potential suggestions must be tested against Government rules which limit what those seeking planning permission can offer (which exist to ensure developers cannot ‘buy’ consents).

13

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

2.3.3 Implementation of the agreed community benefits and development mitigations will be guaranteed through their inclusion within a Section 106 agreement.

Proposals Review 2.4.1 Following public consultation GDL undertook a major review of the proposals and Masterplan in light of the feedback received:

 Public footpaths within the site will be constructed in accordance with National Bridleways Standards;

 Dwelling heights restricted to no more than two‐and‐a‐half storeys;

 Sentinel Housing will be a named applicant to deliver the affordable housing element of the scheme;

14

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix A

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Correspondence

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Planning Development Civic Offices London Road Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 4AH

Ref. 2014‐081 Sherfield‐on‐Loddon

Dear Sir or madam,

Re: Proposed Outline Planning Application for Residential Development of up to 100 dwellings on Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon.

Gladman Developments are proposing to make an application for Outline Planning Permission for up to 100 residential units on land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon. We would like to take advantage of Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council’s Pre‐Application Consultation and understand that for a development of this size a fee of £3,589.25 + VAT would apply and enclose a cheque for this amount.

I provide a site location plan, constraints and opportunities plan and draft development framework plan for your information.

We would be grateful if you could provide us with a date for the pre‐application consultation meeting, along with the Team members who you propose to be in attendance.

Site Location

The site is located to the west of Sherfield‐on‐Loddon, north of Goddards Lane. The site is located west of existing housing on Goddards Close, and is immediately adjacent to Sherfield‐on‐Loddon’s settlement boundary. The site has an area of approximately 6.66 hectares. A site location plan is attached, together with a draft Development Framework Plan.

Development Proposals

The proposed development will be submitted in outline and is for up to 100 homes of varying type, size and tenure including affordable homes. Open space, Recreational space, on‐site drainage and associated landscaping will be provided. It is proposed that access will be taken off Bow Drive and will not therefore be a reserved matter.

Environmental Impact Assessment Screening

A letter requesting a Screening Opinion on the need for EIA will be submitted to the Council under separate cover.

Planning Application Submission

It is of course the intention that the application would be submitted with a range of supporting information and reports. This will include:‐

• Site Location Plan • Development Framework Plan • Proposed Access Plan • Design and Access Statement including Illustrative Masterplan • Planning Statement inc. Sustainability Matrix • Statement of Community Involvement • Transportation Assessment and Travel Plan • Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Strategy • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment • Noise Report • Ecological Appraisal • Arboricultural Assessment • Archaeology Statement • Air Quality Screening Statement • Socio Economic Impact Assessment • Foul Drainage Strategy • Energy Statement

Other supporting reports may also be commissioned as appropriate.

We believe this approach will provide Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council with all the necessary information concerning the effects of the development to enable it to make an informed decision concerning the proposals.

In any event, in advance of submission of the above application, we are keen to arrange a meeting to discuss the merits of the proposal and the application content with the Council’s planning officers. With this in mind could you please advise of your availability for such a meeting at your earliest convenience? In some recent cases we have found it useful to include the relevant ward councilor in pre‐application discussions and therefore you may wish to adopt a similar approach in considering our proposals.

In the meantime should you have any queries or require further information please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours faithfully,

Steve Barker Project Manager

Enc.

Gladman House, Alexandria Way, Congleton Business Park, Congleton, Cheshire, CW12 1LB

Our Ref: 14/02635/EN28 9th September 2014 Your Ref: 2014-081 Sherfield-on-Loddon

Dear Mr Barker,

Location: Land North of Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon Proposal: Outline Planning application for Residential Development of up to 100 dwellings

I refer to your pre application request made in relation to the above site received on 3rd Sept 2014, please find below the views of Brian Conlon, Senior Planning Officer for Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council.

The Council have undertaken an initial consultation on this proposal and have outlined the results of this consultation process below in conjunction with the wider relevant planning concerns.

This pre-application submission consists of a letter and indicative plans from Gladman Developments Ltd received 3rd Sept 2014.

Any application for the development of the site will need to be considered against the development plan and any other material considerations. The proposal has also been scoped for developer contributions for which I have attached a copy of the Council‟s Section 106 Scoping Proforma for your information.

Site Location

The site is located to the immediate west of Sherfield on Loddon village and is currently fields in agricultural use. Bow Brook lies to the north of the site and the land falls from south to north towards this watercourse. Agricultural fields continue to the north, west and south of the site, whilst residential development on the edge of Sherfield-on-Loddon lies beyond the east of the site. Carpenters Farm House lies beyond the south-western corner of the site. Vegetation cover within the area is extensive with numerous woodlands, copses, tree belts and hedgerows.

Riparian vegetation along Bow Brook defines the northern boundary, whilst there are well treed hedges on the western and southern boundaries. Domestic vegetation within gardens exists in parts along the eastern boundary with Sherfield-on-Loddon.

Goddards Lane runs beyond the southern boundary whilst the road to Bramley lies beyond a field to the north of Bow Brook. There are also public rights of way to the south and south- west of the site.

Principle of Development

Planning Law requires that applications for planning permission must be determined in accordance with the development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this case the development plan for the area is the Basingstoke and Deane Borough Local Plan 1996-2011 Saved Polices 2006 (BDBLP).

Since the adoption of the BDBLP, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) has been introduced. The NPPF constitutes guidance, which the LPA must have regard to (as advised in Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004), however this document does not change the statutory status of the development plan as the starting point for decision making.

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) sets out the Government's planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. The NPPF is a material consideration in the determination of this planning application. The weight given to relevant policies in the development plan is dependent upon their conformity with the policies in the NPPF (NPPF Annex 1).

The NPPF requires Local Planning Authorities to approach decision-taking in a positive way, to foster the delivery of sustainable development. The three dimensions to achieving sustainable development are defined in the NPPF as: economic, social and environmental.

Paragraph 14 of the NPPF states that the presumption in favor of sustainable development should be seen as a golden thread running through both plan-making and decision-taking. Paragraph 49 continues to state that housing applications in particular should be considered in the context of the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

The Core Planning Principles of the NPPF state that planning should proactively drive and support sustainable development to deliver the homes and thriving places that the country needs. Every effort should be made to objectively identify and then meet the housing and development needs of an area and respond positively to the wider opportunities for growth.

NPPF Section 6: Delivering a wide choice of high quality homes (paragraphs 47 – 55) is the most relevant in relation to considering the principle of such a major residential scheme and requires that LPAs have a five year housing land supply. It states „Housing applications should be considered in the context of the presumption in favor of sustainable development. Relevant policies for the supply of housing should not be considered up-to-date if the local planning authority cannot demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites.‟

The Council‟s Authority Monitoring Report 2013 indicated that, at the time of publication, the Borough Council could only demonstrate 3.8 years of supply based on an annual housing requirement of 748 dwellings per annum (dpa).

On 6 June 2013, the Borough Council‟s Cabinet endorsed a revised local housing requirement for the borough of 748 dwelling per annum (dpa). This decision was reiterated by Cabinet at their meeting on 18 February 2014. The figure of 748 dpa was based on detailed technical work that had been completed both in house and by consultants to inform the Borough‟s draft or Pre-submission Local Plan.

This position has been partially updated in light of recent major planning appeals (North of Popley/Marnel Park and Kennel Farm) and currently stands at 4 years of supply using the Liverpool Method of calculating land supply and 3.6 years using the Sedgefield Method.

For the purposes of this proposal, the Council therefore continues to fail to meet its five year housing land supply requirement. This position reflects a number of local issues including the current lack of an adopted Local Plan which is the means by which future housing development areas are identified and allocated, uncertainty in the housing market over recent years, together with a lack of residential consents being granted.

The NPPF states (Para 49) that relevant policies for the supply of housing should not be considered up-to-date if the LPA cannot demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites. As this is the case here, the presumption in favor of sustainable development is relevant and afforded considerable weight. In terms of decision making, this means that permission should be granted unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, or where specific policies in the Framework indicate that development should be restricted.

Housing land supply is one of many material considerations that need to be addressed when considering the development of sites. The lack of a 5 year housing land supply does not automatically override other material considerations however is afforded considerable weight in any decision that is taken. The specific wider impacts of the development are considered further below.

Neighbourhood Planning

This site lies outside of the Settlement Policy Boundary (SPB) of Sherfield-on-Loddon as defined under Saved Policy D5 of the Basingstoke and Deane Borough Local Plan (BDBLP). The proposed site is therefore within the open countryside in policy terms, and the proposed development for up to 100 or 132 dwellings as contained within the submitted information would constitute a departure from the Development Plan.

However Policy SS5 of the Pre-Submission Local Plan requires 150 homes to be identified through neighbourhood plans/neighbourhood development orders, or other suitable means, in areas outside of those specifically listed within that policy. It should be noted that Sherfield-on-Loddon is outside of those areas specifically listed within the policy.

The Council will support the Parish Council and other representatives from local communities to identify the most appropriate means of meeting this requirement through Neighbourhood Planning, rural exceptions schemes, or a review of Settlement Policy Boundaries.

Following formal submission of what it considers to be a sound plan for examination on the 9th October 2014, the Council can confirm that the Plan will be further advanced, however this needs to be balanced against the evident fact that there remains outstanding objections to the plan and concern expressed by the Planning inspectorate. Therefore, the policy can only be afforded very limited weight for the purposes of considering this scheme.

Affordable Housing

Any major residential development on the site would need to include the provision of an appropriate level of affordable housing, with the starting point for negotiations being 40%. This proportion is identified in Saved Policy C2 and the Council‟s Affordable Housing SPD.

No information has been submitted in support of this pre-application enquiry to demonstrate the scheme will provide the desired level of affordable housing, and therefore the Council is unable to consider whether any scheme would adhere to the Affordable Housing Policy requirements in this regard.

The Council‟s Housing Officer would undertake an assessment of the proposed mix of affordable housing put forward, and any such provision likely be secured via a legal agreement with any application.

Housing Mix and Lifetime homes

Saved Policy C3 (Housing Mix) advises that 30-50% of market dwellings proposed on a particular development site, should be of 1 or 2 bedroom units with the highest proportion being sought on sites on or adjoining the centers of settlements including Basingstoke with a good or a reasonable range of services and public transport opportunities.

Whilst this pre-application enquiry is for a development of anywhere in the region of 100-132 dwellings, no details have been forthcoming as to the mix of dwellings types or amount. The Local Planning Authority will need to be satisfied that, in due course, there is sufficient and clear justification for the proposed housing mix. If the mix of units for any application does not comply with Saved Policy C3 and the supporting SPD, clear justification for this policy departure would be required.

Paragraph 7.3 of the Supplementary Planning Document on Housing Mix and Lifetime Homes provides more detailed guidance and states that „30% of market dwellings should be small units (2 bedrooms or fewer) on all other sites‟ (which includes this site). It goes on to state that:

“…there may be exceptions where a higher or lower proportion would be appropriate as a result of detailed design considerations, the physical characteristics of the site, the character of the area or local housing need and existing provision. However, the starting point will always be for a range of units and sufficient evidence will need to be provided if this is not to be followed on an individual site.”

The supporting text of Policy C3, which is not saved, had also stated that the Borough Council will aim to achieve a standard of 80% of small dwellings on any development having a gross floor area of no more than 70sqm.

The Submission Local Plan contains a draft housing mix policy (Policy CN3) that is based on the latest evidence (including the recently published Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA)) and provides flexibility for developers to provide a mix of market housing. It does not include a percentage of dwellings to be smaller units and states that development proposals will be required to provide evidence, proportionate to the scale of development proposed, to justify the mix of housing proposed. Whilst the policy has very limited weight, the most up to date evidence base (which demonstrates the need for more flexibility) is relevant and should be used when considering relevant proposals such as this.

Saved policy C3 requires 15% of all new homes in the borough to be built to Lifetime Homes standards, although it is recognised that this part of the policy only encourages developers to include a proportion of such homes. Policy CN3 (Housing mix for market housing) of the Pre- Submission Local Plan also requires 15% of all new homes in the borough to be built to Lifetime Homes standards.

Highways

Paragraph 32 of the NPPF is clear that developments which generate a significant amount of vehicle movements should be supported through a Transport Assessment and planning decisions shall need to take account of whether:

 the opportunities for sustainable transport modes have been taken up depending on the nature and location of the site, to reduce the need for major transport infrastructure;  safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all people; and  improvements can be undertaken within the transport network that cost effectively limits the significant impacts of the development.

It is also clear that development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts of the development are severe.

A full Transport Assessment will still be required to demonstrate the impact of the development on the wider highway network.

This will need to include the following:

Existing Conditions

• Existing site information – describing the current physical infrastructure and characteristics of the site and its surroundings; • Baseline transport data – background transport data and current transport infrastructure details.

Existing site information

• A site location plan that shows the proposed development site in relation to the surrounding area and transport system; • The permitted and existing use of the site; • The existing land uses in the vicinity of the site, including development plan allocations, or potential future use in the case of undeveloped sites; • existing site access arrangements including access constraints, where appropriate; • any abnormal load uses of the current site.

Baseline transport data

• A qualitative description of the travel characteristics of the existing site, including pedestrian and cyclist movements and facilities, where applicable; • Existing public transport provision, including provision/frequency of services; • A description and functional classification of the highway network in the vicinity of the site; • An analysis of the injury accident records on the public highway in the vicinity of the site access for the most recent five-year period.

Proposed Development

• Plans and drawings showing the proposed site layout, particularly the proposed pedestrian and vehicular access points into the site; • The proposed land use; • The scale of development, subdivided by land use where appropriate; • The main features (design layout and access points) of the development; • The person-trip generation of the proposed development and distribution of trips across mode; • Proposed improvements to site accessibility via sustainable modes of travel; • A proposed parking strategy and internal vehicular circulation (including number of spaces, parking accumulation, parking layout in relation to other site elements, overspill parking considerations, disabled parking, motorcycle parking, cycle parking, taxi drop-off points); • Residual vehicular trip impact and • The transport impacts of site construction, including the requirements of abnormal loads In the construction, use and decommissioning the present development.

This is likely to require trip rates and the proposed distribution and assignment of trip to the network.

If the final application is to result in the development of more than 100 units, which seems likely given the submitted options, Hampshire County Council (HCC) will determine the final connection of the site to the local highway network and evaluate the Transport Assessment, while the internal layout will be determined by the District Planning Authority.

For projects that prospectively include new highway works you should be aware of HCC‟s document HCC Manual for Streets Companion Guide [accessible at HCC website http://www3.hants.gov.uk/hampshire-manual-for-streets.htm]. Early engagement with HCC as adopting highway authority is strongly advised.

Among its content are the following:

[2.5.1 ] All new development sites to be covered by a Section 38 agreement will require a safety audit as part of the quality audit process at various stages.

[2.5.2 ] It is advised that the Stage 1 safety audit is carried out and issues identified addressed prior to seeking planning permission.

Stage 1 - Preliminary Design, Stage 2 - Detailed Design, Stage 3 - Completion of Works

[2.16.5] Close liaison between those preparing development briefs, design codes, or outline applications, and the Highway Authority is recommended to achieve tree planting proposals acceptable for Highway adoption, and at an early stage of design,

[2.16.7 ] Clarity regarding the location of the proposed Highway boundary and private or open space boundaries is required. The intentions for future maintenance arrangements of open spaces and streets must be identified at the outline stage.

[3.1.2] The developer is strongly advised to discuss all aspects of the work with the Highway Authority at an early stage.

Any alternative type of construction should be a matter for discussion at an early stage between the developer and the Highway Authority. The precise specification for all materials etc to be used must be agreed with the Highway Authority before works commence.

[3.1.3] The basic principles of design of all structures (including highway earthworks) within the highway, including general arrangement drawings, should be submitted to and agreed by the Highway Authority at an early stage.

[3.10.1 ] Arrangements for dealing with surface water runoff from any new development shall be considered at the earliest possible stage of design.

[3.18.1] The design and detail of permeable paving, must be approved by the Highway Authority prior to construction.

[3.50.2] Developers should discuss with the Highway Authority at an early stage the adoption of particular hard and soft landscape features

The site is located adjacent to two road routes; western section of Goddards Lane to the south and Goddards Close, Bow Drive, Bow Grove to the east. Both roads are unclassified public roads. Goddards Lane is rural in type without footways or street lighting. Goddards Close, Bow Drive and Bow Grove have a more urban appearance and are equipped with footways and street lighting. There is an hourly bus service operating along Goddards Close, Bow Drive and Bow Grove.

The internal layout of the development will be expected to comply with all aspects of the Manual for Streets Guidance with a 20mph design speed. Parking to dwellings including secure cycle parking requirements, must be provided in accordance with Basingstoke and Deane's Residential Parking Standards and refuse/recycling facilities must be provided in accordance with the Storage and Collection of Waste and Recycling document.

It is essential that all new developments are designed so that waste and recycling issues are taken fully into account as part of the pre-planning application process and officers from the Environmental Care team are fully consulted. The provision of an effective and efficient waste and recycling service is a key council operation, and it is essential that the needs of this service are considered at the earliest design stage for new developments.

The referred documents are for your information:

 Residential Parking Standards July 2008 revised Dec 2012 http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/browse/environment-and-planning/planning/adopted-local- plan/spd/residential-parking-standards-spd.htm

 Appendix 6 - Storage and Collection of Waste and Recycling Sept 2008 (version 2) http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/browse/environment-and-planning/planning/adopted-local- plan/spd/design-and-sustainability-spd.htm

 HCC Manual for Streets Companion Guide: http://www3.hants.gov.uk/manual_for_streets.pdf

Whilst it is acknowledged the submission includes concepts of an indicative main street for both options, the absence of any proposed internal site layout prevents the LPA from providing any detailed advice over the layout of the scheme.

Both options submitted do appear to provide sufficient opportunities to provide pedestrian and cycle connections with the existing settlement of Sherfield-on-Loddon and the surrounding public open space within the development site. Of course, any detailing of a final design would need to ensure conflicts between pedestrian and motorised vehicles are minimised.

In relation to transport contributions any proposal would be scoped by HCC and the development of this site would result in the need for an off-site contribution towards transport, the exact mitigation package will need to be determined by any forthcoming Transport Assessment and where necessary a Travel Plan will also need to be secured. Such requirements are likely to be secured via a legal agreement with any application.

Biodiversity

Saved Policy E7 (Nature/Biodiversity Conservation) of the BDBLP requires development proposals to ensure no adverse impact on protected species or harm to nature conservation assets.

Paragraph 109 NPPF states amongst others aims that the planning system should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by:

 “recognising the wider benefits of ecosystem services;  minimising impacts on biodiversity and providing net gains in biodiversity where possible, contributing to the Government‟s commitment to halt the overall decline in biodiversity, including by establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures;”

The proposed development involves the development of an area of arable land which is bounded by hedgerows, mature trees, with at least one pond nearby and lies adjacent to the Bow Brook and associated floodplain grazing marsh.

The Council‟s Biodiversity Officer has been consulted and has confirmed that to accompany any full planning application for such a scheme in this location with these constraints, the following information is required to assess biodiversity implications:

 A preliminary ecological survey/assessment of the development site

This assessment should include information on whether the development is likely to have an impact on any key habitats and/or notable/protected species within or adjacent to the application site.

 Mitigation proposals for any potential adverse effects on biodiversity (Only if the above requested ecological survey/assessment of the development sites indicates any significant ecological issues present themselves)

The habitats on and surrounding the site have the potential to possibly support a number of protected and notable species as well as being important habitats in their own right. As a result, information would need to be submitted to establish if any key habitats and species are likely to be present and adversely affected.

If the ecological assessment indicates there is a moderate or high likelihood of a European Protected Species being present and adversely affected, such as bats, great crested newts and/or dormice, information will also be required in order for the LPA to comply with its duty to discharge its statutory obligations under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010.

The covering letter contained within this submission states that an ecological appraisal will be included as part of the supporting information when a planning application is submitted. This is welcomed, however for reference, it will be expected that the applicant will appoint a suitably qualified ecological consultant(cy) to undertake a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal / Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey to assess the biodiversity value of the areas that are likely or potentially to be impacted by the proposal, identify any European protected issues and determine if additional more detailed survey/assessments are required. If so, these additional surveys will need to be carried out.

Any required surveys should be undertaken at the appropriate time of year and relevant existing biodiversity data sourced from the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre (HBIC) and any other relevant/appropriate sources. Once appropriate ecological surveys / assessments have been undertaken the consultant will need to undertake an Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) of the proposal. Where biodiversity impacts are identified, including indirect impacts, such as pet predation on local wildlife, the submission must provide adequate mitigation / compensation.

The proposal should also provide overall biodiversity enhancement as required by Paragraph 109 of the NPPF and given the size of the development proposed, a net gain for biodiversity will be expected as a minimum.

Ecological surveys/assessments and impact assessment should follow the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) and other appropriate best practice guidance. Information on where to find a suitably qualified ecological consultant(cy) can be found on the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management‟s (CIEEM) website - http://www.cieem.net/ (from the main page, select „About CIEEM‟ and then „Directory‟).

Conservation and Heritage

The proposed development would occupy agricultural fields to the immediate north and east of the Grade II listed Carpenters Farmhouse. The development would surround the setting of this building on two sides. The impact of such a scheme is unlikely to be capable of being fully mitigated and the loss of countryside is likely to be considered to cause harm to the significance of the listed building.

These concerns therefore weigh against the grant of any consent, and can trigger the presumption against planning permission as required by Section 66 of the Planning (Listed Building Conservation Areas) Act 1990, made explicit by South Lakeland v. SoS in 1992, and clarified by Barnwell Manor in 2014.

Only where the public benefits of the proposal would decisively outweigh any identified harm, should permission be granted. Such balance may include consideration of the comparative impact of alternative sites (see Forge Field Society v. Sevenoaks DC).

As the relationship with farmland is intrinsic to the significance of nearly all farms, the harm caused to the setting of this listed building and therefore the significance of the farm is likely to be considerable.

No part of the proposed development would fall within the Sherfield-on-Loddon Conservation Areas (CA), and thus Section 72 “special attention shall be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of that area” is not triggered. However Paragraph 132 of the NPPF requires great weight to be given to the preservation of CAs as designated heritage assets including their setting, which implies a similar level of consideration to that required under S.72.

As with the listed building, a significant impact is likely to occur as a result of the loss of green open space on the edge of the village, which informs how the village historically functioned as part of the countryside and the historical limits to the size of the village.

Whilst a buffer strip is proposed within the indicative plan of this submission, this can only partly mitigate the resultant impact as it would replace current permeability between the Listed Building, the CA and the countryside with a greater degree of enclosure. Whilst this is supported in theory over plain „sight‟ of the development, it does not detract from the fact such mitigation is considered necessary and could fundamentally alter the character of the area in its own way - particularly bearing in mind the important vista which is noted on the CA Appraisal.

Consideration also needs to be given to the setting of Bulls Down Camp as a Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM). Both English Heritage and Hampshire County Council will be consulted as a statutory requirement under any forthcoming planning application.

Archaeology

Given the extent of the development, with the stream and associated land there is always the potential to encounter archaeological remains and sites associated with the early exploitation of this landscape. As the site has an archaeological potential we would advise that any application be submitted with a Heritage/ Archeology Statement which addresses below ground archaeological issues. This should review and discuss the site‟s archaeological potential, should consider what early stage archaeological survey might be appropriate and set out a mitigation strategy for investigating archaeological sites impacted by development. It would not be unreasonable for the LPA to require the imposition of standard Archeology conditions should permission be granted which safeguard the recording of such features.

Landscape

Saved Policy E6 (Landscape character) of the BDBLP requires development proposals to be sympathetic to the landscape character and quality of the area. This is supported by the aims of the NPPF which advise that the planning system should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by protecting and enhancing valued landscapes (Para. 109).

The proposal would result in the development of over 100 dwellings within open countryside beyond the settlement policy boundary of Sherfield on Loddon. This has the potential to result in a significant and adverse impact on the landscape character and visual amenity, and therefore conflict directly with the provision of the above policies.

At this stage, it is acknowledged that very little information has been provided with the enquiry beyond two illustrative development options and therefore the advice the LPA can make with regard to the impact on the landscape will be inherently limited.

Should further information be provided, then of course, any additional comments can be made in a more detailed capacity.

The site is considered to be in a sensitive location. The verdant rural character of the area is contributed to significantly by the current undeveloped nature of the site which would be substantially changed by the nature and scale of this development.

The site lies on the western edge of the Loddon and Lyde Valley Landscape Character area as defined within the Borough Landscape Character Assessment. This has a number of characteristics that are of relevance to the site, as follows;-

 broad, shallow valley sides of the River Lyde and River Loddon that meander through, and unify, the varying landscape types;  pattern ranging from open farmland around Stratfield Saye, Blacklands Farm and Mapledurwell, to that which is smaller-scale and more enclosed in the mid-section of the area and within the valley itself. The flat, low-lying valley floor pasture has a distinctive pattern of drainage ditches, willow-lined watercourses, water meadows and an often pastoral, remote character;  generally unspoilt, quiet and rural character, and a sense of remoteness in less accessible parts of the river valley, but with intrusion by major roads, the railway and electricity pylons in some areas, and by an incinerator immediately east of Chineham;  relatively low intervisibility within the area, due to landform and vegetation minimising views, but more extensive views possible in the more open northern and southern landscapes;

The character of the site is defined by the agricultural nature of the land beyond Sherfield on Loddon. The strong vegetation structure, Bow Brook and landform, all combine to give the area a strong rural character, reducing the impact of some more defined man-made elements such as the edge of the village and also pylons.

With respect to visual amenity, it is likely that the development will be visible from a number of locations, some of which are very close to the site and therefore could have an adverse effect on visual amenity.

A development comprising of over 100 houses is considered of a sufficient magnitude that it will inherently transform the immediate landscape and ultimately have an adverse impact on the character of the area. The layout plans provided do show some indicative green infrastructure in the form of open space and landscaping around the perimeter of the site, but without any detail as to housing layout, scale and relevant Landscape Visual Assessment Appraisals the LPA are unable to correctly balance the impact on landscape character against the effectiveness or appropriateness of any kind of proposed mitigation.

A good landscape structure will be key in helping to deliver a successful layout. In detailing the scheme, the following points should be taken into account:

 The layout and materials used will need to ensure that they reflect the countryside edge location;  Native planting species, fencing and street furniture that is more rural in character should be used;  The use of suburban style materials such as close boarded fencing onto public facing areas should be avoided;  In order to protect the open space on the periphery of the site, adequate measures will need to be taken to prevent these areas from being parked on.

Environmental Health

From an Environmental Health perspective, no objections are raised to this development in principle, however the following comments should be noted with regard to the amenity of future occupants.

Given the distance of the proposed development site from Goddards Farm, odour and noise from this farm are considered unlikely to adversely impact the amenity of dwellings on the proposed development site. There does not appear to be any other nearby sources of noise which might give rise for concern.

The LPA are pleased to note from the submission that Gladman Developments Ltd do intend to submit a noise report and air quality screening assessment with any planning application. We would draw the developers attention to our Guidance for Developers and Consultants on Noise Assessments and Reports for Planning Applications and our Air quality guidance which can be found below: http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/Resources/8/8/%7B8847EB7A-1134-46E2-B424- F3C5E4C15693%7D/Documents/Guidance%20note%20for%20developers%20and%20cons ultants%20- %20Noise%20assessments%20and%20reports%20for%20planning%20applications.pdf and http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk/browse/environment-and-planning/pollution/air- quality/guidance.htm

With regard to construction noise, given the scale of the proposed development and proximity of existing dwellings, any planning application should be submitted with a full programme for the monitoring of noise and vibration during the construction of the development. Such a programme should specify the method of noise and vibration measurement and make provision for noise and vibration measurements to be taken during construction at times to be agreed in writing with the LPA. The results of all noise and vibration measurements should be provided as soon as they are available and the development would then need to be carried out in accordance with those approved details. A programme for the suppression of dust during the construction of the development should also be provided with a full application.

In terms of contaminated land, the proposed use is considered sensitive to the presence of contamination. The LPA would therefore expect any full/outline application to be accompanied by an appropriate contamination assessment, undertaken by a suitably qualified and competent environmental consultant.

Urban Design

Any detailed proposal including layouts, scales and appearance would allow the Council‟s Urban Design team to provide advice. In respect of the proposed densities detailed in each option submitted, this will depend heavy on the layout and extent of the development, its relationship with the existing settlement (including cumulative impacts of development), and the impact on the Conservation Area. Such detail will allow us to make more detailed comments on the indicative layouts.

What will be central in achieving a successful scheme is the level connectivity and legibility with Bow Drive and Goddards Close which both run parallel to the main development site. Connecting these routes through to the development site will require careful consideration of the existing residential properties sites to the west of these routes. The same prudence must be take in addressing Goddards Lane to the south whilst acknowledging the established level of mature screening afforded by trees and hedges to this boundary.

Once further information is forthcoming, we would be happy to explore these factors and other urban design related considerations.

Community Infrastructure Contributions

The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations came into force on 6th April 2010. The Regulations allow local authorities to raise funds from developers undertaking new building projects in their area. Whilst Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council has not yet developed a levy, the regulations stipulate that, where planning applications are capable of being charged the levy, they must comply with the new tests set out in the CIL regulations. These new tests are as follows:

(a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms (b) directly related to the development; and (c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development.

Saved Policy C1 of the Local Plan and the S106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Interim Guidance sets out the Council‟s approach to the provision of infrastructure and community facilities needed as a result of development.

We have consulted all relevant services on this pre-application submission and have attached a copy of the completed scoping sheet that details what would be likely to be sought in relation to community infrastructure based on the proposal as currently shown.

Flood Risk, Drainage and Sewerage

Any application will need to evaluate flood risk and the impact upon surface water drainage. A small area on the northern boundary of the site adjoining the Bow Brook is located within Flood Zone 2 (Medium probability of flooding). The rest of the site is located within Flood Zone 1 (Low probability).

Through the LPA‟s formal pre-application consultation with the Environmental Agency (EA), you have been provided with a copy of the EA‟s „Preliminary Opinion‟ response direct. The LPA have been provided with a copy of this response.

We note the EA would expect as a minimum because the site lies within Flood Zone 2 (FZ2), a full Flood Risk Assessment (FRA).

We would expect a site specific FRA to accord with paragraph 103 of the NPPF. The FRA should demonstrate that there is no increase, and if possible a reduction in flood risk following the development. In particular, both the LPA and the EA would expect to see the following issues addressed for development located within FZ2 (if FZ2 is located within the 1 in 100 yr plus an allowance for climate change flood extent):

 Finished Floor Levels  Loss of floodplain storage  Access and egress

As the site is greater than a hectare, surface water issues should be considered and assessed within any forthcoming FRA. This should include:

 Surface Water Management  Discharge Rates  Storage Volumes  Risk of Flooding onsite

In light of the northern part of the site experiencing historic flooding in 1947, we would support the EA‟s recommendation that all elements of the proposed development be located in Flood Zone 1 (FZ1)

If development is proposed in FZ2, a full Sequential Test must be undertaken. This test must demonstrate, in compliance with the NPPF, that there are no reasonably available alternative sites in areas with a lower probability of flooding that would be appropriate for the type of development proposed, in accordance with paragraph 101 of the NPPF.

Should you wish to bring forward development within FZ2, we would be happy to discuss the Sequential Test, as it would be the LPA‟s responsibility to determine whether the test has been adequately passed.

From a watercourse ecology perspective, the EA would expect to see a minimum 8 metre wide buffer zone between any new development and the bank top of the Bow Brook. It appears the proposed development is able to provide this requirement.

Also contained within the EA‟s response is water efficiency guidance which is supported by national planning policy and constitutes sustainable design within Saved policies of BDBLP.

Saved Policy A7 of the BDBC Adopted Local Plan 1996-2011 seeks to ensure that there is sufficient capacity for water supply, surface water drainage, foul drainage, and sewage treatment, or that this can be provided in time to serve the development, without adversely affecting existing users, or the environment. The policy makes it clear that it is for developers to demonstrate whether there is capacity on and off site to serve the development, and that it may be necessary for developers to arrange appropriate studies to ascertain whether the development will lead to overloading of existing infrastructure. When there is a capacity problem and improvements are not programmed developers are expected, within the terms of the policy, to requisition or fund improvements, which can be secured through the planning process (through 106 or condition depending on the requirements therein). We would suggest that an appraisal of all services within the area is undertaken, in part to demonstrate that there are no impediments to development.

Other Issues

Environmental Impact Assessment‟s (EIA's) are needed for certain developments, and on 24 August 2011, consolidated, updated and replacement statutory provisions were introduced through The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. These Regulations place a duty on the Council to screen developments and to give reasons for negative screening decisions.

Development Appraisal

The Council do not currently have a five year housing land supply, and therefore in line with the NPPF, the delivery of housing on the site has to be considered positively in principle, and is afforded considerable weight. However, the NPPF requires the granting of planning permission unless any adverse impacts of doing so would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies of the NPPF when taken as a whole.

The NPPF states that the purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development and Local Planning Authorities are encouraged to approach decision-taking in a positive way, to foster the delivery of sustainable development. The three dimensions to achieving sustainable development are defined in the NPPF as: economic, social and environmental.

These dimensions are also referenced within the adopted Local Plan at Saved Policy D5, where it is recognised that “Residential … proposals which contribute to social, economic and environmental well-being will be permitted”. Whilst this is set out in relation to existing Settlement Policy Boundaries rather than sites located outside of settlements, this policy provides an indication of the intended acceptability of any planning application.

This is a sensitive countryside location, which itself contributes to the rural character of the area through its inherent landscape. The site is constrained not only by adjacent residential uses, but by a listed building, hedges, trees and a river.

It may not be possible to completely screen the development, but careful consideration of the existing landscape may reduce the impact of the development. Any future application will need to fully evaluate the impact of the development on the character and visual appearance of the area.

As set out above, it is considered that developing housing at the site could cause substantial harm to the character and appearance of the setting of a Listed Building and potential impact on the adjacent CA. These consequences weigh significantly against the proposed development and need to be carefully balanced against the wider community benefits.

In this regard, an outline application for over 100 dwellings with all matters reserved is discouraged and should as a minimum involved a full application which includes the submission of building heights and layouts. This would allow the Council to determine if any significant and demonstrable harm would or would not be caused by the development.

The cumulative impact of development in the village should also be given due consideration within any submission, as permitting development would prejudice the Neighborhood Planning led approach and this will be afforded due weight when considering all the relevant factors in the determination of an application.

In conclusion, the proposal is contrary to the prescriptive aims of the BDBLP, but when taking the NPPF into account as a material consideration, the principle of residential development may well be acceptable and supported. However, any submission will need to sufficiently allow the LPA to balance the wider benefits of the scheme, principally addressing housing need, against the harm (as identified above) in determining whether this would „significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits‟. Based on the level of detail, this cannot be established as part of this pre-application submission.

For the avoidance of doubt, the opinions contained in this letter are that of an officer of the council and have been made without the benefit of a site visit, and do not bind the Council or its elected Members in relation to any decision they may wish to make on the site in the future.

If you have any queries or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact Brian Conlon on 01256 845244 or email [email protected]

Yours sincerely

Planning and Development Manager

SECTION 106 AGREEMENT SCOPING PROFORMA

Application 14/02635/EN28 Registered

Proforma completed: 11 December 2014

Details of Application: Pre-application enquiry for a proposed outline planning application for residential development of up 100 dwellings

Location: Address: Land At Goddards Farm Goddards Lane Sherfield-on-Loddon Hampshire

Applicant: Gladman Developments Ltd

Case Officer: Brian Conlon

The obligations listed below may be subject to change dependent on any additional information received during the course of the application.

1. PUBLIC ART

Method of calculation Not consulted for this application Need/justification Current provision/ existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated facility or infrastructure Amount On site Amount Off site Officer Ceri Adams, Cultural Investment Officer (Strategy and Innovation)

2. TRANSPORT

Method of calculation Hampshire County Council Transport Contributions Policy Need/justification Using Hampshire County Council’s Transport Contributions Policy September 2007, which is a formulaic approach to calculating transport contributions across the County, applicable to development of all sizes from single units upwards, with the basic measurement of transport impact being the net increase in the number of multi-modal trips that a development is expected to generate, a financial value is assigned to each multi-modal trip derived from the known cost of providing transport infrastructure to serve the new development within Hampshire. For residential development, rates are provided per dwelling size. These trips rates were derived from the National Travel Survey and the National Transport Trends statistics of the Office of National Statistics and are, where possible, specific to the characteristics of Hampshire. The scoping pro forma translates the contributions policy to a specific financial value based on the multi-modal trips for the proposed development. As the number and mix of dwellings is not known, the charging schedule is shown below:- 1 bed dwelling = £1980 2-3 bed dwelling = £3745 4+ bed dwelling = £5457 Current provision/ existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated Toward both local transport strategy measures in the vicinity of the site to promote facility or infrastructure travel by sustainable modes, and improvements to mitigate against the cumulative impact of this development within the A30 East corridor which will include pedestrian bus & cycle infrastructure measures as identified within the HCC preferred list of transport schemes and as apportioned by them in accordance with their Transport Contributions Policy guidelines. Amount On site Amount Off site £See Above Officer Andrew Ingall, Transport & Section 106 Support Officer

3. COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Method of calculation The contribution is based on the figure of 0.75sq m of community floor space per dwelling, multiplied by a build cost of £2,000 per sq/m of floor space, which is the cost of recently constructed community buildings within the Borough. This equates to £1,500 per dwelling or £658 per person where the housing mix is known Need/justification The findings of the recent Leisure and Recreations Needs Assessment (LRNA) states that the council should:  Ensure that major developments include appropriate hall provision and minor developments contribute to the enhancement of community halls, where necessary;  Require residential developers to contribute to the provision or enhancement of community halls within the appropriate distance threshold of their developments  The council youth strategy identifies a need for provision and improvement of youth facilities across the borough. This identified need is supported by information from consultations with residents in surveys (Your Big Say 2013; Council’s Place Survey 2008 and the Residents’ Survey 2012). The council has a commitment to improving and providing community facilities to allow young people easy access to activities and leisure provision in their local area Current provision/ Bramley Village Hall, Clift Meadow Pavilion, Sherfield-on-loddon Village Hall existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated Contributions towards improving existing community facilities within the facility or infrastructure above areas. Amount On site Amount Off site Still awaiting further information to number of split. Here is my split chart. 1bed=1.5, 2bed=1.7, 3bed=2.3, 4bed=3.0, 5 bed=3.5. Officer June Balcombe Community Development Team Leader Alex Piper Facilities Provision Officer

4. EDUCATION

Method of calculation HCC Policy on Developers’ Contributions for Children’s Services Facilities Need/justification This development lies within the catchment area of Bramley CE (C) Controlled Primary School. This school has an admission limit of 75 pupil’s per year group but has a forecast number of four year olds within its catchment area of between 83 and 90 over the next 5 years. Together with this and other potential new housing sites, which are not included in these figures, pressure for school places will increase creating the need to provide additional places at the school. Current provision/ existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated It is anticipated that the school will need to be expanded to provide 90 places per facility or infrastructure year group. This will result in additional accommodation being required to provide the necessary number of classrooms. A feasibility study on how this additional accommodation can be provided is being produced. No costs are available for this particular project but costs estimates will be in the region of £1.5m. Costs will be confirmed as soon as possible. Amount On site 100 x £5057 = £505,700 Amount Off site Officer Glenn Parkinson, School Organisation Officer, HCC

5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Method of calculation Need/justification Current provision/ existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated facility or infrastructure Amount On site Amount Off site Officer Tim Davis, Housing Officer (Strategy and Enabling)

6. LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Method of calculation Assessment of landscape character and local features.

Need/justification Protection and ongoing management of public areas and landscape structure throughout the site. Current provision/ N/A existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated Landscape Management Plan required to cover all public landscape areas facility or infrastructure and structural landscaping. Amount On site N/A Amount Off site N/A Officer Paul Johnston, Natural Environment team leader (on behalf of Landscape Team)

7. OPEN SPACE

Method of calculation The figure accords with the Interim Green Space Standards adopted in July 2013 as follows: Urban areas 65 sq.m. per person Rural areas 32 sq.m. per person The financial contribution rate of £16.58/sq.m. is calculated from the implementation and design costs per sq/m of providing or improving multi-functional green space including parks, kickabout and accessible natural green space. Based on the council’s occupancy rates set out in the Council’s planning guidance S106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure No. of bedrooms No. of persons 1 1.5 2 1.7 3 2.3 4 3.0 the total open space rates based on dwelling size are as follows: Urban Rural 1 bed - £1608.26 £795.84 2 bed - £1832 £901.95 3 bed - £2478.71 £1220.29 4 bed - £3233.10 £1591.68 5 bed - £3771.95 £1856.96 Need/justification Policy C9 of the Local Plan states that the details of the leisure and open space standards are set out in the Interim Planning Guidance in respect of Section 106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure. It goes on to state that provision of on-site or contributions to meet the provision of any new or enhanced leisure facilities or open space, will be required to meet the reasonable needs of the residents of developments. The multi-functional green space obligations are therefore necessary to ensure that the proposal is acceptable in planning terms as the failure to meet the specified standards would result in an unacceptable form of development. The additional residents will result in additional pressure on existing facilities in the locality of the site and therefore a contribution towards mitigation of these pressures is justified. Our justification for seeking and calculating the level of contributions accords with the CIL regulations and advice given in and Circular 05/05 and meets the following tests: (a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms (b) directly related to the development; and (c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development Current provision/ Sherfield Green approximately 220m from site and Sherfield Playing Field existing facilities (excl approximately 330m from site. affordable housing) Although there is a slight surplus of MFGS in the Bramley and Sherfield ward, the distance from the furthest part of the site would exceed the thresholds recommended for kickabout areas as set out in the green space standards, and the size of development would support the requirement for this additional provision. Details of anticipated Provision of new open space on site to meet the needs of the additional facility or infrastructure residents. Based on the average occupancy level of 2.4 persons per dwelling, the total green space requirement to meet the Green Space Standards for 100no dwellings is 7680sq.m. to meet the needs of 240 additional residents. (100 x 2.4 = 240 x 32sq.m. = 7680sq.m.) Amount On site Provision of multi-functional green space to meet the council’s minimum size standard and design requirements for amenity green space suitable for kickabout contained in the Green Space Standards 2013 - Minimum 1600sq.m. rectangular level grass area plus 10m buffer to housing. Amount Off site None Officer Sooh Boocock

8. PLAYING FIELDS

Method of calculation Playing Fields – 1.0ha per 1,000 persons, as derived from open space standards as set out in the local plan or a contribution of £265.70 per person, which is based upon up to date costs for this type of provision.

Need/justification Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan Policy C9 identifies that “Provision of on-site, or a contribution to the provision of off-site, of any new or enhanced leisure facilities or open spaces required to meet the reasonable needs of the residents of their development will be sought from housing developers by the Borough Council. This is set within the context of the local plan aim to ensure borough residents and visitors having access to high quality leisure facilities and that there is adequate provision of facilities to meet local demand.

National Planning Policy Framework ref 73: Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation can make an important contribution to the health and well-being of communities. Planning policies should be based on robust and up-to-date assessments of the needs for open space, sports and recreation facilities and opportunities for new provision. The assessments should identify specific needs and qualitative deficits or surpluses of open space, sports and recreational facilities in the local area. Information gained from the assessments should be used to determine what open space, sports and recreational provision is required.

The assessment of S106 contributions for sport and recreation provision is applied consistently to all applications, based on best practice and recommendations of NPPF, utilising the following evidence base:  BDBC Adopted Local Plan  BDBC S106 - Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Guidance Document  Town / Parish Community Plans (where available)  Leisure and Recreation Needs Assessment (LRNA) (September 2008) – a NPPF compliant detailed audit of all sport and recreation provision undertaken by Kit Campbell Associates  Sport England Active People Survey for Basingstoke and Deane  Local Demographic Profile  BDBC sport and recreation residents survey November 2012

Using the adopted Local Plan occupancy figures the development will generate approximately (awaiting information) additional local residents. It is recognised that this is a relatively small impact but the development does result in additional pressure on existing facilities in the locality of the site. Therefore an ‘appropriate’ contribution towards mitigation of these pressures is justified.

The LRNA assessment and local analysis identified that there is a deficit in the quality of a range of outdoor sport and recreation provision within the area.

It is essential that an appropriate amount of sport and recreation facilities are provided locally to enable local residents to access high quality local facilities to meet the Local Plan policy tests. This is particularly relevant in rural areas of the borough where access to provision is current more limited. In this instance a ‘proportionate’ off site contribution is sought towards providing new sport and recreation provision in the local area.

Our justification for seeking and calculating the level of contributions accords with the CIL regulations and advice given in NPPF and Circular 05/05 and meets the following tests: (a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms (b) directly related to the development; and (c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development

Current provision/ The Green, Sherfield School, Bramley Football club, strategic town based existing facilities (excl provision. affordable housing) Details of anticipated Contributions towards improving existing sports and recreation facilities facility or infrastructure within area and strategic town based provision Amount On site Amount Off site Still awaiting information on dwellings. In the meantime here is my calculations on split 1bed = 1.5, 2bed = 1.7, 3bed = 2.3, 4bed = 3.0, 5bed=3.5 Officer Elinor Gold Facilities Monitoring and Planning Officer Alex Piper Facilities Provision Officer

9. PLAY AREAS/RECREATION

Method of calculation The figure accords with the Interim Green Space Standards adopted in July 2013 as follows: All areas 0.5 sq.m. per person

The financial contribution rate of £373.46/sq.m. is calculated from the implementation and design costs per sq/m of providing or improving equipped play areas.

Based on the council’s occupancy rates set out in the Council’s planning guidance S106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure the total play area rates based on dwelling size are as follows: 1 bed - £0 2 bed - £317.44 3 bed - £429.48 4 bed - £560.19 5 bed - £635.55 Need/justification Policy C9 of the Local Plan states that the details of the leisure and open space standards are set out in the Interim Planning Guidance in respect of Section 106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure. It goes on to state that provision of on-site or contributions to meet the provision of any new or enhanced leisure facilities or open space, will be required to meet the reasonable needs of the residents of developments. The equipped play obligations are therefore necessary to ensure that the proposal is acceptable in planning terms as the failure to meet the specified standards would result in an unacceptable form of development. The additional residents will result in additional pressure on existing facilities in the locality of the site and therefore a contribution towards mitigation of these pressures is justified. Our justification for seeking and calculating the level of contributions accords with the CIL regulations and advice given in Circular 05/05 and meets the following tests: (a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms (b) directly related to the development; and (c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development Current provision/ Approximately 330m to Sherfield playing field. existing facilities (excl affordable housing) Details of anticipated Based on the average occupancy level of 2.4 persons per dwelling the additional facility or infrastructure number of residents will be 240. The equipped play requirement to meet the Green Space Standards is 240 x 0.5sq.m. = 120sq.m. The developers initial proposal of 0.4ha of play area on site would be acceptable and would directly provide for the additional residents, however the minimum quantity of equipped play required by this development is less than the Council’s minimum size standards for equipped play areas and therefore, in accordance with the Green Space Standards, an off-site contribution towards the enhancement of the play area would be acceptable. Amount On site 0.4ha as proposed would be acceptable, and is the preferred option. Amount Off site If the decision is made to provide off-site rather than on-site play, a £44815.20 contribution towards enhancements at play areas in the vicinity would be required. Officer Sooh Boocock

10. ALLOTMENTS

Method of calculation The figure accords with the Green Space Standards adopted in March as follows: All areas 3.4 sq.m. per person

The financial contribution rate of £21/sq.m. is calculated from the implementation and design costs per sq/m of providing or improving allotments.

Based on the council’s occupancy rates set out in the Council’s planning guidance S106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure the total allotment rates based on dwelling size are as follows: 1 bed - £107.10 2 bed - £121.38 3 bed - £164.22 4 bed - £214.20 5 bed - £249.90 Need/justification Policy C9 of the Local Plan states that the details of the leisure and open space standards are set out in the Interim Planning Guidance in respect of Section 106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure. It goes on to state that provision of on-site or contributions to meet the provision of any new or enhanced leisure facilities or open space, will be required to meet the reasonable needs of the residents of developments. The allotment obligations are therefore necessary to ensure that the proposal is acceptable in planning terms as the failure to meet the specified standards would result in an unacceptable form of development. The additional residents will result in additional pressure on existing facilities in the locality of the site and therefore a contribution towards mitigation of these pressures is justified. Our justification for seeking and calculating the level of contributions accords with the CIL regulations and advice given in Circular 05/05 and meets the following tests: (a) necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms (b) directly related to the development; and (c) fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development Current provision/ Allotments in Sherfield-on-Loddon fall under the jurisdiction of existing facilities (excl Sherfield-on-Loddon Parish Council. There are no BDBC allotments in affordable housing) Sherfield-on-Loddon. Demand for allotments to be obtained from Sherfield-on-Loddon Parish Council. Details of anticipated Improvements to existing Sherfield-on-Loddon Parish Council allotment facility or infrastructure facilities and infrastructure. Amount On site Amount Off site £16,422 based on average of 2.3 persons per dwelling. Bedroom mix unknown. Officer Mark Littlefield

Planning Obligation Notes Planning obligations or S106 agreements are intended to make development acceptable where it would otherwise be unacceptable in planning terms and includes the provision of financial or physical contributions towards community infrastructure. They are a mechanism for resolving planning issues arising from development proposals, and can be used to bring development in line with the objectives of sustainable development, as set out in planning policies.

The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 122 are relevant in regard to S106 planning obligations:

From 6 April 2010 it is unlawful for a planning obligation to be taken into account when determining a planning application for a development, or any part of a development, that is capable of being charged CIL, whether there is a local CIL in operation or not, if the obligation does not meet all of the following tests: (a) Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms (b) Directly related to the development; and (c) Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development. Government guidance requires planning obligations to be predictable for all stakeholders including the public; as far as possible use standard approaches; and be effectively monitored. If a planning condition would achieve the same as a clause in an obligation, a condition should be used, rather than an agreement because it enables a developer to appeal to the Secretary of State regarding the imposition of the condition.

This council’s current approach to planning obligations under Local Plan Policy C1 (S106 Contributions) and C2 (Affordable Housing) is detailed within the policy guidance note ‘S106 Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure’ (July 2005 and updated April 2010). The council adopted this as interim planning guidance in light of proposed National changes and not as supplementary planning guidance (or document). Further to this, the council has published a best practice note ‘Affordable Housing and Community Infrastructure’.

Bonds or ‘sureties’

The council’s standard S106 agreement seeks the provision of a bond in respect of all types of planning obligations, including financial contributions as the provision of any on or off site provision is likely to be a significant. Bonds or ‘sureties’ are direct contracts between two parties guaranteeing the performance of obligations by a third party. In the context of S106 agreements, bonds are provided by a financial institution to the council. They secure compliance with the obligations in a S106 agreement in the event of default by the developer/owner.

If called upon, a bond would ensure that the obligations in a S106 agreement are complied with. In the absence of a bond, the council may then be faced with the prospect of taking legal action against successors in title. As successors in title may include individual residents, on rare occasions, this may leave the council with no effective redress.

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix B

Consultation Leaflet

PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Potential Residential Development Land north of Goddard’s Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon OUR PROPOSAL Gladman Developments are proposing a new residential led development of approximately 95 homes on land north of Goddard’s Lane. GET INVOLVED - HAVE YOUR SAY The purpose of this consultation is to provide an opportunity for local residents, businesses and organisations to learn about our draft proposals. This will be your first opportunity to tell us what is important to you and what you would like to see on this development should it be built. Your feedback is important to us and will be used to help shape our final proposals. Whether you are in favour of, or opposed to new housing on this site, please tell us why. We give careful consideration to the sites we choose, identifying sensible locations in areas where councils have not met their full housing needs. This approach has enabled us to gain planning approval on over 90% of the sites we promote. We therefore believe that this site is likely to gain planning approval, and hope that you take this opportunity to respond to this consultation to help ensure that any development that may be permitted is as beneficial as it can be in meeting the settlements needs. Your comments and contributions will be received without prejudice to your rights to comment on the planning application. By having your say, you will have helped shape the developments design and, where relevant, off-site improvements if planning permission is granted. Following this public consultation, we expect to submit a planning application shortly thereafter. We appreciate that people who live within the immediate vicinity of our housing proposals may be concerned about matters such as increased levels of road traffic, loss of views and doubtless many other topics. In order to help address these questions, we have put together a Frequently Asked Topics section at the end of this Leaflet. SITE LOCATION

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2015

Whilst we fully understand why people may have concerns, they need to be balanced against the requirement to provide much needed new houses, to meet the differing needs of an increasing population and address housing affordability. It is schemes like this that enable younger people and their families, in roles that we rely upon (such as teachers, nurses, police officers etc) to have a suitable home conveniently located for their needs. We all know and accept that more housing is needed and a stance of ‘put it elsewhere’ will result in not enough houses being built. OUR APPROACH Gladman Developments recognise its responsibility to respect the character and needs of the existing community, as well as providing housing for new and existing residents. We are also fully committed to delivering additional benefits to Sherfield-on-Loddon wherever possible. As such please do tell us if there are any community facilities that you would like to see improved or developed as part of this scheme. With the help of our consultant team, we are formulating our proposals to deliver a high quality, low density housing scheme. Throughout the process each member of the team provide their specialist advice and input to ensure that the design of the site responds positively to its surroundings, taking into account any constraints. BENEFITS Our housing proposals will bring a wide range of benefits to Sherfield-on- Loddon in the form of: • New high quality housing; • Affordable housing (up to 40%/38 no dwellings); • 37.5% formal and informal public open space on site ; • Walking and cycle links; • Increased spending and customers to support local businesses and facilities such as the local school. • Access to the development will be provided off Bow Drive with footpath/cycle paths leading to and from the existing village. More information, including a short technical summary of key topics can be found on our website: www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon THE NEED FOR HOUSING The UK’s population is growing year on year, with new housing stock needed to meet new demand. The House Builders Federation estimate that the country is over 1 million homes short of what is needed to adequately house the existing population, with several experts suggesting it is nearer to 2 million. The difficulty for many first time buyers is access to high street mortgage facilities, this exacerbates the demand for affordable housing especially from young families. Councils have a duty to ensure that sufficient housing can be delivered to meet all of the housing needs of the population in a 5 year rolling period. To do this they must identify sufficient land to meet their wider housing need. NEXT STEPS We will take into account all comments and suggestions provided to us as part of this consultation. Once a planning application has been submitted you will also be able to make further representations to Basingstoke and Deane who will take these into account before making their decision on the planning application. You can keep up to date on progress using our dedicated website which includes an online feedback form for making comments: www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon Should you be unable to access the internet and would like to request a printed copy, please write to: Your Views Sherfield-on-Loddon Gladman House, Alexandria Way, Congleton, Cheshire, CW12 1LB

Gladman consider all correspondence received and our response to the issues raised will be set out in a Statement of Community Involvement (SCI). As part of a planning application, Gladman submit to the Local Planning Authority a complete copy of all correspondence received (including any details such as your name, address and email where you have provided them). This ensures all your comments are available to the Council during the consideration of an application and shows who we have consulted. As the SCI forms part of the formal application documents, the Council may publish it online, subject to their own Data Protection policies. Should the application be the subject of an appeal, the same information will be forwarded to the Planning Inspectorate. If further consultation is carried out as part of the planning process, Gladman may use your details to make you aware of this and to ask for your views, but will not use this information for any other purpose. OUR PROPOSALS

Proposed n Unsurfaced Bullsdow Proposed Pathways Pumping Station

Retained Existing Trees/Hedgerows

Driv

Bow

Indicative Drainage Pond

Proposed Residential Development

Proposed Equipped Area of Play

Proposed Public Open Space (including informal footpaths and biodiversity enhancement)

Goddards Lane

Retained Exi Trees/Hedge Carpenters Close sdown Close

Potential Footpath Link

Bow Drive

Indicative Main Street CONSERVATION AREA

Proposed Main Access

New garages to replace those lost for access

Goddards Close

Goddards Lane

Proposed Tree Planting in order to screen the housing out as much as is practically possible

ed Existing N Hedgerows ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY ILLUSTRATIVE FREQUENTLY ASKED TOPICS

1. HIGHWAYS AND TRAFFIC For each planning application we employ specialist highway consultants, who liaise with the local highway authority, to produce a suitable highways strategy. This will include providing a safe means of access into the site and ensures that the development will not adversely impact the surrounding road network. Whilst there will be some additional traffic generated from the proposed development, the harm will be offset by enhancements to the local footpath and cycle network to encourage people to travel more sustainably. If necessary we will also carry out local highway improvements to ensure that the additional traffic does not produce a severe impact. It is intended that access into the site will be provided by a junction off Bow Drive. We believe that this form of access is the safest and most appropriate way to enter the site.

2. BUS SERVICE The best and most sustainable way of maintaining and improving bus services is by additional customers using the existing routes and creating revenue for the Operators. At present the population profile in this part of Hampshire is disproportionally weighted towards older and generally more affluent residents, and is not reflective of the national age and general demographic. Those within the current age demographic, are far less likely to use the bus service than younger and less affluent families, who are less represented because of house shortages and unaffordability of house prices. New homes not only increase the population, they help to redress the balance towards the national demographic profile, because new homes are usually occupied by younger families who are currently excluded from this area due to affordability and lack of family homes. Just the extra customers who bus operators rely upon for custom. 3. INCREASE IN COMMUTING Rural areas are not simply hosts of commuters travelling into urban areas. They are more “self-contained” than historic planning policy suggests. Travel to work patterns are fairly similar across many rural and urban areas, often with people commuting from urban to rural areas as well as the other way around. As many people now work and run businesses from home the amount of people commuting has reduced. Furthermore as there is a high proportion of entrepreneurs in your locality who work near home (see point 9 for further details), this will also have an effect on commuting patterns. 4. SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION As part of the initial site review process we have liaised with the Local Education Authority in order to establish the current and future capacity in local Primary and Senior schools. It has been identified that there is no capacity in the Primary School to accommodate the FREQUENTLY ASKED TOPICS expected number of children who will be living on the completed development. As such, if planning permission is granted, a contribution will be paid to the Local Education Authority to ensure that sufficient school places are made available. Often people are concerned that the proposed new development will add pressure on the local school. In reality and supported by research, a proportion of the pupils who will live on the new development will already be attending the local school. Many other pupils are currently driven in from outside the traditional catchment area by parents who appreciate the school’s reputation. This is not a sustainable situation, and if local children continue to decline in numbers and more come to school from further afield, it is possible that the Local Education Authority may consolidate the schools, potentially closing the smallest. 5. FLOODING The site is within Flood Risk Zone 1 and therefore has the lowest risk of flooding. This is confirmed by the Environment Agency’s Flood Map Data. A Flood Risk Assessment will be produced by our appointed specialist consultants to accompany our planning application. The assessment will demonstrate how surface water will be dealt with at the proposed development. In order to ensure flooding downstream from our site is lessened, rather than increased, as a result of our development, we are proposing to provide an attenuation pond (sometimes called a “Balancing Pond”). This pond collects the rainfall from our land and discharges it into the network at the rate the land currently releases rainfall, this is often referred to as the “Greenfield Run off Rate”. The pond we place on site will be 20% larger than that required to accommodate rainfall from our site alone. This extra capacity lessens the likelihood and amount of existing flooding that may have already occurred further downstream. 6. GP CAPACITY

Through our initial site review process we understand that there is capacity in your local GP Surgery. 7. ECOLOGY A specialist ecology consultant has been appointed to survey the proposed site for protected species. Their initial investigations have found that there are no protected species etc on-site. To ensure that we have comprehensively evaluated the site for ecology and wildlife, additional surveys will take place prior to the determination of the planning application. Whilst the additional surveys may identify that there are protected species on-site, the devel- opment proposals will provide adequate mitigation, and wherever possible enhancement, to ensure these species are protected. The land we are proposing to build homes upon is currently intensively farmed and is therefore home to very few species of plants or animals. It is accepted by wildlife experts that suburban gardens, balancing ponds and green spaces on new developments provide a home to a vastly greater range of wildlife and flora than any farmed field. Therefore the range of Biodiversity will be greatly increased by this proposal. FREQUENTLY ASKED TOPICS

8. FACILITIES IN THE VILLAGE We believe that, if possible, a scheme like the one we are proposing, should help provide an additional facility or facilities to improve the range of services that are currently available in Sherfield-on-Loddon. The facility will be able to offer amenity to new and existing residents alike, and will make you community more self-sufficient (“sustainable”). Through this consultation, please let us know your opinion on what facility would be of most value to your household and community. 9. JOBS AND LOCAL ECONOMY Your Local Authority has an enviable record for job creation and enjoys a very low level of unemployment, which at 4% and is well below that National average of some 7%. It is a combination of the skilled and well educated population living in your locality, along with a high proportion of entrepreneurs and a supportive council that has given rise to a far higher level of new business start-ups and jobs in typically the fast growing knowledge, technology and service sectors of our economy. These type of jobs are often more prevalent in towns, villages and rural areas than in cities, because entrepreneurs typically like to work close to where they choose to live, which partially explains why your local authority is more prosperous and enjoys low unemployment. Our research shows that within a 20-minute peak hour journey time of Sherfield-on-Loddon there are some 8,348 office jobs and 1,287 production Jobs offering a range of opportunities. We would also expect some new occupants in the intended homes to be entrepreneurial and creators of new local businesses. A significant and fast increasing proportion of people now work from home, which not only creates a very sustainable lifestyle, it also increases spending locally. The development of 95 dwellings could provide up to 228 new residents in Sherfield-on-Loddon. Of these new residents 128 are expected to be economically active. These economically active residents could generate a total gross expenditure of £2.5m annually, a proportion of which will be spent within the locality. 10. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The proposal will include up to 40% affordable homes. The homes provided will be “affordable” as defined by the Government. The range is expected to be shared ownership, discounted open market and rented homes. The exact mix of house sizes and tenures will be decided by negotiation with your Local Authority Housing team. Typical occupants of the “Affordable” homes are skilled workers, newly married locals, teachers, nurses, policemen or local people wanting to return to the area they grow up in for example those local ‘children’ returning from University. Providing a range of affordable homes on site ensures that those living in the locality have access to a range of housing options. FREQUENTLY ASKED TOPICS

11. OPEN MARKET HOUSING This will form the other 60% of the homes to be built and typically attracts buyers with young, or imminent, families who normally have a local connection to the area. These families typically use the school, shop and pubs in the area to a greater extent than the older generation and help ensure the continued survival of these community facilities, as well as creating a more balanced age profile. Without more housing, the children of Sherfield-on-Loddon have tended to have to move away to areas with more affordable housing, when in preference many would have preferred to stay far closer to home, friends and family. 12. WHY HOUSING GROWTH IN OUR SETTLEMENT Government Policy on New Housing is designed to ensure that all settlements grow, prosper and thrive rather than decline as the age profile rises. Historically Local Authorities have been guilty of following the same pattern of growth in successive Local Plans without pausing to consider where the best place for development should be. Rural areas perform well in sustainability terms and can have thriving communities if they are kept alive with impetus from new housing growth. If new development does not take place in Sherfield-on-Loddon then in 20 years’ time it could resemble a retirement community, not a thriving, vibrant and prosperous community of all age groups. 13. POTENTIAL RESIDENTS Many of our previous public consultations have raised concerns about the potential influx of people affecting the harmony of the existing settlement. In our experience the biggest proportion of new residents will be people who already know and love this area. They will often have been brought up here, have relatives here, work locally or already live here and may be moving to a more appropriate accommodation to meet their needs. 14. FOUL AND STORM SEWERS We understand there is concern about the capacity of existing foul sewers and rainwater drainage in the area leading to recent flooding events. It is the responsibility of the foul drainage provider to provide any upgrades to their system to adequately cope with existing requirements and any additional requirement brought about by this development. They will have sufficient time to provide these improvements. In accordance with good practice stormwater will be retained in an attenuation pond and allowed to slowly discharge into the existing water course (Bow Brook). Your Views Sherfield-on-Loddon Gladman House Alexandria Way Congleton Cheshire CW12 1LB www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon

Please note that all of the information we are providing to you in this document and on our Website is in draft form and will be refined and updated as part of the entire Consultation exercise. Not only will our proposals be shaped by your responses, we also cannot be as knowledgeable as local people who have lived and often grown up in Sherfield-on-Loddon, so if we have made errors or omissions in our work to date we will be grateful for help in correcting these. Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix C

Press Advert

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix D

Parish Council

Steve Barker

From: Steve Barker Sent: 04 January 2016 09:23 To: 'Catherine Ryle' Subject: RE: Land North of Goddard's Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon

Hi Catherine,

Apologies for the lateness of my response but I’ve been out of the office over the Christmas period and only just picked up your email – and letter sent in the post.

Unfortunately we don’t have anyone available to attend this meeting but would still be willing to meet with the Parish Council in a private meeting at a convenient time should they wish. Alternatively if there is anything that comes from this meeting that we can provide an answer to, or from Parish Councillors, then we’re more than willing to provide a response.

Sorry, Steve

From: Catherine Ryle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 December 2015 09:52 To: Steve Barker Subject: Land North of Goddard's Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon

Your ref: 2014-081 Sherfield-on-Loddon

Dear Mr Barker

Please find attached a letter regarding the above. I have also sent a hard copy to you by post.

Regards

Catherine

Catherine Ryle Clerk, Sherfield-on-Loddon Parish Council

Tel:01256 842662 [email protected]

This email, and any attachments, may contain protected or restricted information and is intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly. If this email has been received in error, please notify the author immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on any of the information contained in it or attached, and all copies must be deleted immediately.

1

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix E

Consultation Boards

01 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon INTRODUCTION

Introduction Gladman Developments Ltd has successfully invested in communities throughout the UK over the past 20 years, developing high quality and sustainable residential, commercial and industrial schemes. We are proposing a residential development of approximately 95 dwellings on land to the west of Sherfield- on-Loddon.

Have your say We wish to hear your views with regard to the quality, mix and design of this proposed development. We will take into account all comments and suggestions provided to us as part of this consultation.

This is your opportunity to comment on and influence the planning of this site. You will have further opportunity to provide comments to Basingstoke and Deane District Council during the planning application process. 02 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon HOUSING NEED

Housing Need

Every Council is required by the Government to boost significantly the supply of housing and to make planning decisions in the light of a presumption in favour of sustainable development.

BRAMLEY

Folly Lane River Loddon

Mill Lane TURGIS GREEN A33

Sherfield Road

Hartley Lane

Bramley Road

HARTLEY WESPALL

SHERFIELD-ON- LODDON

River Loddon Reading Road Reading

Wildmoor Lane

A33

Why is the site suitable for development?

Sherfield-on-Loddon is considered to be a sustainable location to accommodate a large proportion of the Council’s future housing growth. The site is suitably located with good access to existing community facilities and to the local public transport network. The proposal will provide new homes to sustain the vitality and viability of the local community. 03 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon EXISTING CHARACTER

Landscape Character

The site lies immediately adjacent to the settlement of Sherfield-on-Loddon in the Loddon and Lyde Valley character area. This character area covers a broad tract of landscape extending from Old Basing, Chineham and Basingstoke eastwards and northwards to the District boundary. Loddon and Lyde Valley’s key characteristics and other relevant extracts are provided below:

• Broad, shallow valley sides of the River Lyde and River Loddon that meander through, and unify, the varying landscape types;

• The flat, lowlying valley floor pasture has a distinctive pattern of drainage ditches, willow- lined watercourses, water meadows and an often pastoral, remote character;

• Generally unspoilt, quiet and rural character, and a sense of remoteness in less accessible parts of the river valley, but with intrusion by major roads, the railway and electricity pylons in some areas, and by an incinerator immediately east of Chineham Mixed Farmland and Site Boundary Parkland Woodland: Small scale Character Areas Modern Military Open Valley Sides Open Arable on Clay

Mixed Farmland and Open Valley Floor Urban areas Woodland Farmland

Residential Character

The existing residential areas adjoining the site off Goddards Close and Goddards Lane include a range of 20th century dwellings of varying typologies with common themes including red brick and render; roofs of slate; and red clay tiles. The local character of Sherfield-on-Loddon provides design elements that could be taken forward into the proposed residential site. The historic core of the village contains a conservation area with many listed buildings of varying vernacular forms and styles. Red brick buildings with pantile roofs are widespread within the centre and timber frame construction with thatched roof detail . 04 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon CONSTRAINTS & OPPORTUNITIES

What are the constraints and opportunities?

56.0m

57.0m

58.0m

59.0m

60.0m

61.0m

62.0m

Bow Drive

63.0m

64.0m Bow Gardens

65.0m

66.0m

Goddards Close

67.0m

Goddards Lane 68.0m

69.0m

Consider Views from Goddards Application Boundary Potential Access Point off Goddards Close Lane

Listed Building Existing Roads Extent of Flood Plain

Existing Trees & Hedgerows Consider Views from Existing Properties Off Site Existing Pond

Contours Landscape buffer to screen Conservation Area Conservation Area

Low Point- Potential Location for Proposed Public Open Space Corridor Balancing Pond 05 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon VISUAL CONTEXT

Visual Analysis

The site is situated at the western edge of Sherfield-on-Loddon village and comprises of one field currently under arable use. Consequently it Bramley Road is lacking in any significant vegetation cover or other internal features of value. The site boundaries are well contained by existing features: 4 Goddards Lane forms the southern site boundary. Goddards Lane is narrow, sunken and enclosed by hedgerows with occasional trees. The 2 historic farm complex at Carpenter’s Farmhouse, off Goddards Lane abuts the site’s south western boundary. Bow Drive

Gateway 1 Modern residential development situated by Goddards Close, Bow Drive and Bulls Down Close abut the eastern site boundary and includes Reading Road bungalows as well as two storey properties.Trees and scrub along the Bow 3 Goddards Lane Brook corridor are situated adjacent to the site’s northern site boundary An established field hedgerow with a few mature trees forms the western Aerial plan with site boundary and viewpoint locations site boundary.

Goddards Lane Court Farmhouse Proposed Site

1 PHOTO VIEWPOINT 1: Easterly view from footpath by Bulls Down Close

Proposed Site Properties along Bow Drive

2 PHOTO VIEWPOINT 2: View from existing properties off Bow Drive Goddards Lane Woodland on Bulls Down Camp Goddards Lane Residential properties on Goddards Close

3 PHOTO VIEWPOINT 3: Northerly view from Goddards Lane by Little Bowlings Farm 06 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon HISTORIC CONTEXT

Historic Maps

Identified in the historic mapping, the surrounding area of Sherfield-on-Loddon appears unchanged until 1969. The 1969 map records the addition of residential properties to the western edge of the site boundary. Further residential estates along the north edge of Sherfield-on-Loddon can be seen in the 1981 map along Bulls Down Close. The 1981 map also records the presence of further dwellings to the east off Northfield Road.

c1888 c1969

c1912 c1981

c1956 c2013 07 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon FACILITIES

What are the local facilities?

The site is sustainably located with good access to the village centre and existing community amenities. The plan and key below show a range of existing local services and facilities that are within 400m, 800m and 1200m, 1600m and 2000m (5, 10, 15, 20 & 25 minute walking distance) of the site. There are bus services that call at Basingstoke, Lychpit, Chineham, Bradford Abbas, Bramley, Silchester and Tadley. A bus stop is located in close proximity to the site along Goddards Lane. There is also a free school service bus from the village to Bramley.

3

1 9 4 7 5 2 6

B

2000M

1600M

1200M B

800M 6 B 9

400M B 9 7 7 B B 5 4 B 8

B

9

1 Medical Practice 5 Post Office 9 Recreation Ground/Park/Sports Club

2 Railway Station 6 Places of Worship B Existing Bus Stops

3 Primary School 7 Public House Existing Bus Routes

4 Local Shops 8 Village Hall 08 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon THE FRAMEWORK

Bullsdown Close

Bow Drive

Proposed Bow Gardens Residential Development Up to 95 dwellings

Gateway

Goddards Close

Goddards Lane

N

Proposed Public Open Space Application Boundary: 6.66Ha Proposed Tree Planting (including informal footpaths and biodiversity enhancement) : 2.36Ha Proposed Residential Development Proposed Equipped Area of Play: 0.04Ha 4.16Ha) Up to 95 dwellings @ 23dph

Retained Existing Trees/Hedgerows Proposed Unsurfaced Pathways Potential Footpath Link

Indicative Drainage Pond: 0.10Ha Indicative Main Street Conservation Area

Visually-sensitive way-markers and Proposed Landscape Buffer Potential Main Access off Bow Drive benches 09 Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon THANK YOU

Thank you for taking the time to view these exhibition boards. Comments can be sent via this web- site, email or posted to the address below.

Website: www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon

Email: [email protected] (using Sherfield-on-Loddon as the subject line)

Alternatively comments can be posted to the address below:

Your Views - Sherfield-on-Loddon Gladman Developments Ltd. Gladman House Alexandria Way Congleton CW12 1LB

Gladman consider all correspondence received and our response to the issues raised will be set out in a Statement of Community Involvement (SCI). As part of a planning application, Gladman submit to the Local Planning Authority a complete copy of all correspondence received (including any details such as your name, address and email where you have provided them). This ensures all your comments are available to the Council during the consideration of an ap- plication and shows who we have consulted. As the SCI forms part of the formal application documents, the Council may publish it online, subject to their own Data Protection policies. Should the application be the subject of an appeal, the same information will be forwarded to the Planning Inspectorate. If further consultation is carried out as part of the planning process, Gladman may use your details to make you aware of this and to ask for your views, but will not use this information for any other purpose.

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix F

Ward Councillors

Land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield‐on‐Loddon Statement of Community Involvement

Appendix G

Feedback

Steve Barker

From: D Monkman Sent: 08 December 2015 06:51 To: YourViews; Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 06:51:09 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Bow drive is already congested with traffic and parked residents cars. The introduction of this scheme will increase traffic and cause major congestion and traffic problems. Large vehicles including buses already have difficulty navigating the area and the proposed scheme will make this intolerable. Bow drive is narrow where the suggested entrance to the scheme is and this will increase potential problems. Enhancing the local foot paths and cycle network will not resolve this fundamental problem.

Prefix:: Mr Your name: D Monkman Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Pamela Painter < Sent: 08 December 2015 08:50 To: YourView Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:49:58 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Very concerned about extra traffic through Goddard's close and how drive which already gets congested making it difficult For buses and emergency services.

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: The local state school is already under great pressure already having to add new classrooms Roads around proposed site were not constructed to take more traffic as the estate roads will be used as a through road and Make it dangerous for existing children and elderly residents. So would like to know proposals about this. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Pamela Painter Your email: Address: 15 Bullsdown close Sherfield-on-loddon Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Kate Sent: 08 December 2015 09:54 To: YourViews; Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:54:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am horrified and very worried about there being no school places and this will affect all children currently in the village no matter how much money you throw at the local authority. Also the roads round here are not big enough for the current flow of traffic that it will be dangerous with all the new traffic how will you over come this? How is the sewers going to work as all the sewers in this area are private ownened by the current home owners so you can not just tap into this? Regarding your question number 13: are you saying people with a link to the village will be offered the houses first before they go to the open market, as an easte agent I do not understand how you can print the comment you have as this clearly can not be the the case. This field is a bat hunting ground and home to many species of bats as they can be seen very often. They are protected by law and this will disrupt them greatly. How do you plan on dealing with this? You may be creating more houses but you are creating much bigger problems from crime levels lack of schooling and endangering more people . Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes do not do it. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I am going to be in contact with the media over this as it yet again highlight how corrupt the council system is as the owner of the field have recently been telling all locals he has no intention of the field being developed and he is going to continue to farm it. Surprisingly he is on the council and as he has a vested interest in this it shows how underhanded and corrupt councils are and this is not only going to ruin the heart of sherfield as a quiet pretty village but it is going to course endless problems with road acess, schooling , medical care, environmental and animal disturbance and over all destroying the village as it is. So can you please put together how you will be responding to the media on all issues raised. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Kate Your email: Address: Goddards close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg27 0eg

1 Steve Barker

From: stuart lyon < Sent: 08 December 2015 20:27 To: YourViews; Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:26:50 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: to many houses are being built in the surrounding areas, sherfeild on loddon in a conservation area. 40% social housing. as happened in brambly crime rates will increased. there is no infrastructure to take n additional 95 houses. that equals an additional 180 cars on the road, village cannot cope with this.schools cannot cope... not wanted.. this is a lazy farmer/council who ae just after a quck buck and don't care about the village or its surroundings. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: councils involved should stop taking back handers and look at the bigger picture..stratfield say has from no proposals there for building.. move it there or to many down.. this side of basingstoke is over developed. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: farmland is farmland...it is required to feed people more houses built means less food can be made. also basingstoke town centre is a dump with unused buildings, look at basing view full of unused office blocks, tthats to name one site, all of these sites can be redeveloped for housing. this should be started and used first. before building in a conservation area. since german road was built on there has been at least 3 near accidents on the sherfield road involving pedestrians in sherfield ,this will get worse. who will be held accountable for the first death???? hopefully the parish councillors who agree to this... i suspect this is a survey by the home builders and has only one intention... Prefix:: Mr Your name: stuart lyon Your email Address: 8 bramley road Postcode: rg270bx

1 Steve Barker

From: Laura Eves Sent: 08 December 2015 21:11 To: YourViews; Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:10:42 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly disagree with this proposal! Sherfield on Loddon and bramley are struggling with the huge number of people who already reside here, the schools, parking anf local shops are so busy and the traffic through both villages is ridiculous! Until there are improvements to the local school (bramley church of England primary school), which has been I'm special measures more than one occasion, and improvements for local shops, parking and congestion on the roads within the village I really so not think any more houses should be built. Not to mention the beautiful countryside you will be destroying, the wildlife you will effect! Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Sherfield on Loddon and bramley don't need more homes, you should he focusing on the parking issues, schools and local shops before even contemplating more buildings. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I hope you listen to what the majority of the residents are asking which is to keep our lovely countryside and focus on the schooling standards for our children! Prefix:: Miss Your name: Laura Eves Your email: Address: 18 garside close bramley Postcode: Rg265gb

1 Steve Barker

From: mrs s horrix Sent: 08 December 2015 23:09 To: YourViews; Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 23:09:16 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: For a village already at maximum capicity in local amenites such as doctors and schools and with an infrastructure currently unable to cope with the recent influx in population I'm interested to see how it can possibly cope with 215 further houses leading to an increase in population in the hundreds.. Your name: mrs s horrix Your email:

1

Steve Barker

From: Nicola Bishop Sent: 09 December 2015 09:56 To: YourViews; Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:56:19 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am a 27 year old woman and I have lived in Sherfield On Loddon for 5 years with my partner. I obtained a rented property in one of the relatively newly built houses (20 years old) at the entrance of the village, which is part of a group of small houses and apartments which should already be considered “affordable”. I have now purchased my own property along Bow Drive where I have been living for one year. I purchased this 3 bed property for 225,000 in December 2014. This is a big three-bedroom ex-council house and should already be considered “affordable”. Similar properties in Sherfield Park (brand-new development nearby) are far more expensive with less space and smaller gardens. I do not understand how new developments can call themselves “affordable housing” when existing housing is less expensive and better value. There are many ex-council houses in Sherfield on Loddon – we make up the majority of the dwellings here. The prices of these houses at this time range from around 250,000 to 300,000 for the larger houses. We also have a good supply of bungalows and there are the original buildings which are, of course, large and expensive. I will now detail my issues with the information provided in the leaflet. New high quality housing – I would hope that all new buildings are high quality although I have seen many examples of this not being the case. This cannot be considered a benefit to existing residents. Affordable housing – as discussed, we already have affordable houses in the village by virtue of previous new-builds in unobtrusive locations and ex-council houses making up a large percentage of dwellings. There is also a huge amount of new development taking place in and around Basingstoke. The majority of Basingstoke is made of new developments already. Why start impacting one of the very few villages remaining in this area? 37.5% formal and informal public space – we have two sports fields, two meadows and a children’s play area. We also have a group of allotments and are surrounded by farms. We already have sufficient public space and adding a housing development will not add to this. Walking and cycle links – there are no additional walking and cycle links in that direction. There is an army base between Sherfield on Loddon and Bramley so it is not possible to walk through that direction to the other village. The only walking and cycle link will be along the new road into Sherfield on Loddon which can hardly be called a link as they will be part of the village! The statement of new walking and cycling links is not true at all. Increased spending and customers to support local business – The businesses in the village do very well and are always busy. Increased spending and customers would, of course, be good for them. This is the only point in the list I actually agree with. Increased customers for local schools – Local schools are completely full. I am genuinely worried about where my future children will attend school and simply paying the LEA money will not solve that problem. The issue of school places exists already and I simply cannot believe the developers will provide sufficient money to build a whole new school or even an extension to resolve the existing issue and an increase in children through 95 homes. Access to the development will be provided off Bow Drive with footpath/cycle paths leading to and from 1 the existing village – This is simply not a benefit. This is just saying there will be a road. Why is this even listed here? I will now detail my issues and concerns regarding the Frequently Asked Topics section of the leaflet. Highways and Traffic – There is a planned development in Bramley that will increase traffic along the Bramley Road quite considerably. It is already difficult and sometimes dangerous to exit Bow Drive onto Bramley Road. The new houses will probably go down to Old Reading Road and left to the roundabout but this is going to increase traffic quite a lot and will inevitably cause difficulties. Another aspect is that the 30mph limit through the village is often not observed. I think the village should have a 20mph limit and speed cameras should be placed along Bramley Road and Old Reading Road, especially if there are more children in the village who will be walking to the local shop. There is also an existing dangerous corner along Bow Drive, exactly at the point where the new road is proposed through the garages. This is due to people parking in the road and there is no way to stop this. An increased traffic flow on this particular section of the road will definitely lead to accidents. Regarding construction traffic, it will be simply a nightmare if the only road into the development area is through the road indicated on Bow Drive. As stated above, this is a dangerous bit of road which is only a minor issue due to minimal traffic on the road. If this is the route you will be taking trucks and heavy machinery then this will definitely lead to difficulties and accidents. Please consider this very closely. Bus Service – Our bus service is well attended and the idea that to “redress the balance towards the national demographic profile” would improve the bus service is simply false. Incidentally, if every area in Britain represented the national demographic profile then we would lose the personality of individual areas. That is not desirable for anyone. Increase in commuting – There is an inevitable increase in commuting as we are close by to Reading and Basingstoke. The idea that we will have a high proportion of entrepreneurs will have no effect on the increased traffic, that statement is, again, false. See Highways and Traffic section for details. Schools and Education – This is a huge issue. Existing residents have difficulties with school places and the variety of schools in the area is simply insufficient. Giving money to the LEA is not going to help. I believe a whole new primary school is required, especially with the new Bramley development. I do not have children but I worry about where my future children will gain their education. The Bramley School is improving in Ofsted reports (from poor to good) but it is still not an outstanding primary school. The schools in Chineham seem acceptable but Chineham itself is a very busy residential area and I imagine they also have difficulties with providing enough places. Flooding – Chosing a development site which is not on a flood plain is just common sense. I would hope this is guaranteed that all new developments do not impose a flood risk on existing dwellings. GP Capacity – There may be spaced in Bramley GP or Chineham GP services but these are theoretical as it is sometimes very difficult to obtain a doctors appointment. I would also ask you to review dentistry services in the area as these are over subscribed. Ecology – I understand the principle that there is minimal wildlife in this field due to the farming. This is a fact, however the village already has two duck ponds, two sports fields, two meadows, and a lot of green space in between. I do not think Sherfield on Loddon has a lack of biodiversity and as such do not think it can be considered a benefit of a new housing estate. You cannot ignore the fact that 95 houses will have a negative impact on the environment. Facilities in the village – As stated, we have everything we could ever want in the village except perhaps a heath provider or pharmacy, and we are very unlikely to get these additional services even with 95 extra homes. We even have two tennis courts that can be booked. We have a shop, butchers, salon, garage, sports facilities, post office, coffee shop, 3 pubs, children’s play area and allotments. What else could we want? Jobs and local economy – The new residents would not be working in the village, they would be working in Basingstoke, Reading, or somewhere along the M3 or M4 motorways. This is not very local. Also, there is only so much you can “enjoy” a low unemployment rate when there are new houses added around Basingstoke at an alarming rate. Affordable houses – Please see details in previous section. There is already “affordable” housing in the village and around Basingstoke. New builds are just as expensive, often more expensive, than existing homes. Another view is that there is plenty of affordable housing in Basingstoke itself. I do not believe the community would benefit from changing the local demographic; quite the opposite. Open market housing – In 2016 most children go to university. It is no longer true that children want to live

2 in the exact same place as their parents. It is a fact of life that as you get older you earn more money and are able to buy more desirable houses. It is inevitable that young adult children will need smaller, cheaper houses than their parents at the beginning of their adult life but it is not essential that these are in exactly the same place, especially as many will live away from their parents. The argument put forward in the leaflet is an argument for ensuring varied housing over districts but not in a single village – that is untenable. Housing growth in our settlement – Our village will not “decline” as it is such a desirable place to live. There are plenty of younger people and plenty of families living here. It will not be a desirable place to live if new development allows it to merge with the nearby villages and Basingstoke, which is my fear. Of course we have a higher percentage of older people in the village but this is because they are often the most affluent and can chose where they want to live without restrictions based on their work place. This is also not a bad thing. Everyone needs to be able to choose where they live and there must be a variety of options for all, not just young adults or those with families. The idea that we will resemble a retirement community is absurd and rude. The idea that we do not already have all age groups in the village is stereotypical and judgemental. The idea that all settlements in the UK must represent national demographics is frightening. Potential residents – Please see above Foul and storm sewers – Please see statements under flooding Personally, I have only been living in my new house for a year and I feel that this development would simply ruin the life I have planned for me and my family in this village. I am surrounded by houses, but out my bedroom window I can see a field, trees and a little bit of nature. If this development goes ahead I will be living in the middle of a housing estate, which is what I spent so much time and effort trying to avoid when we bought our home last year. The village will be forever changed by adding more houses and this will open the flood gates to further development around the back of Bow Drive and we will eventually merge with Bramley. The UK is full of villages, towns and cities with individual personality and these must be protected. If all brilliant colours were required to be representing all possible colours, everything would turn grey. I must defend my right to choose where I live and how I live. This is one of the only villages where there are already affordable houses in Hampshire! Please don’t ruin it for us. This is where I want to bring up my children – in my village.

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Please don't build here. It will change a residential road into a housing estate and this is not what existing residents chose when they moved here. I agree variety of housing is necessary but there are so many new developments in and around Basingstoke I do not believe 95 houses in the village will make any substantial contribution. There may be some affluent people in the village but they do not represent the entire community and we should all have options to chose where we live. If you start turning this village into a town, I simply will not be able to afford to move to another village as other villages are far more expensive than Sherfield on Loddon. Stop stereotyping the people who live here and stop insulting our intelligence by giving ridiculous arguments in leaflets like this. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Ensure these leaflets are distributed OUTSIDE of envelopes - most people will just throw them away a they are addressed to "the occupier". Put a poster and leaflets in the local shop to ensure everyone is aware. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Nicola Bishop Your email: Address: 33 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon, Hook Postcode: RG27 0EJ

3

Steve Barker

From: Darker Sent: 10 December 2015 12:15 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:14:32 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The site is in the proposed Strategic Gap for the emerging local plan and would lead to ribbon development along the Bramley Road which is unacceptable. The village does not need 95 houses as at least 200 houses are already proposed for the other end of the Parish under the local plan and about 400 houses are proposed in Bramley which is less than 1mile distant.. This proposal would exit onto a narrow road and residents would be badly impacted during construction and upon completion. The proposed mitigation strategies are inadequate in terms of maintaining the life choices of current residents. The proposed development would impact badly on key views and landscapes.. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Do not go ahead in Sherfield-on- loddonA development on this scale will be too big for the village and will destroy the ambience which makes the village attractive. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: This proposed development would be too large for the village at this point, particularly as the emerging local plan already allocates at least 200 houses at the other end of the Parish. The development will destroy valuable agricultural land and will detsroy key views and important landscapes which give the village its character. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Darker Your email: Address: Hafod, Sherfield Green Postcode: RG270EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Pullen < Sent: 10 December 2015 14:43 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:43:06 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: You have tree planting to screen much of this development but from whom? The diagram suggests that tree planting will be on the sides where it is farmland on the other side. No point in screening on the proposed location. It would be more appropriate to have screening located between the existing houses and the proposed developement. A good depth of screening too. Suggest a minimum of 75ft. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: In section 12 of your pamphlet it states that in 20 years time Sherfield could resemble a retirement community. A survey in 2013 stated that there are 3548 people in the vilage of which approx 725 are over the age of 60 years. 20% of the village population and as you suggest predominant and affluent. I beg to differ. Not all elderly people are affluent. This would suggest that in 20 years time an awful lot of the aged will no longer be and their houses will be available for future use by perhaps the next generation possibly eliminating your assesment of Sherfield being a retirement settlement. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Pullen Your email: Address: 32 Goddards Close Sherfield on Loddon Hook Hants

Postcode: RG27 0EG

1 Steve Barker

From: Sally Brain Sent: 12 December 2015 10:05 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:05:10 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Road access is not suitable Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Will not work. Will createtoo much traffic Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Too much traffic Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Sally Brain Your email: Postcode: Rg270aa

1 Steve Barker

From: Oliver Harrup Sent: 12 December 2015 14:03 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:03:01 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: As a inhabitant of Sherfield on Loddon, it concerns me that such a large development has been proposed. It was my understanding that a 'strategic gap' had been agreed to keep Shefield separate from Bramley and Taylor's Farm, and there doesn't appear to be any specific requirement for new homes in the village on such a scale. The villagers or Sherfield want to keep it as a village, and keep the rural feel, we don't want to be an extension of Basingstoke. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes, scrap it. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Oliver Harrup Your email: Address: 9 Longbridge Close SOL

Postcode: Rg270dq

1 Steve Barker

From: Bennett Sent: 12 December 2015 20:27 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 20:26:32 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Why propose a development which is too large and totally unnecessary, that by its sheer size will cause undue strain on the local road network which is already congested in the vicinity. There is no necessity for any additional local development and certainly not for over development on this scale, which is out of proportion to other already developed areas within the village. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: A very much smaller development, of 10 -20 dwellings maximum, although not required under any local development plans, built to ensure any views from existing properties MAY be more appropriate although NO additional development would be preferable. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: The local infrastructure just cannot cope with such a large unnecessary influx of people and associated traffic. With current lifestyles an additional 95 dwellings would mean a potential 200+ cars! All using access roads which struggle to cope at present. Prefix:: Mr & Mrs Your name: Bennett Your email: t Address: 19 Poplar Close, Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0 DX

1 Steve Barker

From: R.T.Gaiger Sent: 13 December 2015 22:59 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:59:00 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Have you any idea or are you in anyway interested in the massive impact this development would have on our village?Looking at reports and reviews about your company it seems your main interest lies only in securing money for the landowner and yourselves with no concern for the people who live here.The size and position of this development could only bring further congestion/gridlock to an already very busy village centre.We may need some housing but certainly not on this scale. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Richard Prefix:: Mr Your name: R.T.Gaiger Your email: Address: 3 Devonshire Cottages Hook Postcode: RG27 0ED

1 Steve Barker

From: James Burrows Sent: 14 December 2015 11:43 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:43:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: (1) Road infastructure is not suitable for an extra 200 cars (2 cars per house), its a narrow residential road with cars parked on one side of the road, and busses + delivery vehicles + visitors comming through. Congestation to the corner of Goddards Lane / Reading Road (where the shop is) is already a dangerous rat run, without another 100 houses which will want to park outside the shop too. (2) What houses will be built? Will they be in keeping with this area of the village, i.e. not 3 storey town houses? (3) Views - this development will ruin the outlook of our house, and particularly the bungalows which edge the development (4) Gap - this will continue to merge Sherfield-on-Loddon, and Bramley, so to end up with the villages being a surburban sprawl from Basginstoke through Chineham and outwards. This wil erode the villages identities. (5) Construction - vehicle damage and road damage from construction lorries fighting there way though the narrow roads, and against buses, delivery vehicles and commuter traffic, on double parked roads. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Build somewhere more suitable, that has sufficiant road infrastructure, and that addresses the above points. Prefix:: Mr Your name: James Burrows Your email Address: 23 Goddards Close, Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG270EG

1 Steve Barker

From: Venetia Rowland Sent: 14 December 2015 17:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:31:27 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The proposed development is located within the proposed Strategic Gap Policy EM2 in the Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council's revised emerging local plan. This proposed policy was support by 259 resident in Sherfield on Loddon Parish, together with both Borough Councillors representing Sherfield on Loddon and our Local MP Ranil Jayawardena The size of the development is totally out of keeping with the environment of the village and the housing needs identified from the Neighbourhood Development Plan Questionnaire undertaken. There is no evidence that a development of this size is required within Sherfield on Loddon. And within the NDP questionnaire the preferred approach was small scale infill development and the use of “Brown Field Sites”. The infrastructure for main access into the proposed site is through a high density residential area already developed and of long standing. The area is prone to flooding and has knock on implications on the drainage systems currently installed in that area of the village. The "Tree Planting" would not be substantial and mature to screen the development.

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: This proposal is completely at odds with the NDP findings and in conflict with the Emerging Local Pan of Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and with wishes of residents. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Gladman Developments are unable to make commitments as specified in their leaflet on this development as they will be selling this proposed "development" on to a third party who can decide not to uphold any outline planning commitments. Much is made of walking and cycle links however this is within the proposed development not linking with other such amenities. The traffic that this site will generate in a high car density location will increase the already congested area and the re-occurrence of near fatal accidents. The 20 min commute time to some 8348 office jobs and a further 1287 production jobs is not correct as at peak time the journey on the A33 from Sherfield on Loddon Roundabout on the A33 to the Chineham Traffic Lights takes 20 mins. I would like to see the data to support this claim. Affordable housing requirement of 40% can be appealed on revised planning permission so this is not a cast iron assurance. The comment within regard to a “retirement community” is not substantiated and is pure conjecture. This coupled with the already scheduled through the BSBC Local Plan for 150 homes at Redland which is the emerging Local Plan together with inclusion of omission sites such as Sherfield Hill Farm for a further 200 homes these fall within the Sherfield On Loddon Parish and just 1.5 miles from the heart of the village.

Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Venetia Rowland 1 Your email: Address: Summerfield, Sherfield Green, Sherfield on Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EN

2

Steve Barker

From: Terence Horton Sent: 15 December 2015 18:05 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:04:45 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The large number of dwellings compared to the existing number of dwellings represents an increase of approximately 15 > 20% in the number of houses in the village. The increase in the number of cars will cause a significant both on bow grove and on goddards lane. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: The main access road needs revisiting as the additional traffic will cause significant disruption to local householders and to the village in general. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Has the impact on local schools been determined. This number of houses will surely result in about 100 extra children for local schools. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Terence Horton Your email: Address: 11 Poplar Close Sherfield on Loddon Hook Postcode: RG27 0DX

1 Steve Barker

From: KMorris Sent: 15 December 2015 18:11 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 18:11:07 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Shocking Idea! Sherfield village simply doesn't have the road structure to cope with more housing, the local primary school is heaving as is the doctors surgery...by building yet more houses in this area you are ruining a village location and the structure in place to cope with the housing the village has won't cope with more development. A real shame would like to know the truth behind this development. More consideration is needed for the village - better roads for a start. You failed to make this public - clever targetting just 215 houses! Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes don't do it!...road structure again?? has any thought gone into this at all? you simply can't channel that traffic down bow drive or Goddards lane...where are you going to suggest entry to this housing? Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: You should have mail dropped the whole village not just a select 215 houses...myself and a number of other houses didn't receive a copy. Very sneaky way of proceeding and also having an over the xmas period deadline. A disgrace. How will the surrounding local community cope with yet more housing? Bramley school is heaving...where will children go? What about Secondary schools? The doctors surgery? The drainage in the village isn't great and has flooded on more than one occassion over the past 8 years. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: KMorris Your email:

1

Steve Barker

From: Adrian Burt Sent: 16 December 2015 08:10 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:10:24 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Too many houses for the local infrastructure to cope with at the present time. Your empty assurances mean very little. There is no pressing need for this residential plan to be implemented on this site, there are clear alternatives which would accommodate much smaller and manageable developments.I would be active against any attempt by your company to seek outline permission for the proposed plan. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Look elsewhere. Preferably far away from here. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Since your company will not be developing the site, how can anything I say be of any constructive use. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Adrian Burt Your email: Address: 22 Northfield Road, Sherfield on Loddon Hook Hamposhire Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Pullen Sent: 16 December 2015 09:50 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:50:12 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: We have lived in our house since 12/1982 and have enjoyed the view across the field for which this development is proposed for all this time and as well as the view there is the quietness of the area. To have this proposal go ahead would destroy all of that. Then there is the added aggravation of the traffic and noise associated with building sites. I have retired recently and I certainly do not want to have to put up with all the disruption this proposal would cause. The traffic problems, particularly at peak times, would be horrendous. Going down to the Bramley road a lot of cars are parked on the road overnight and going out of the village down Goddards Lane to The Shop and on to the A33 it can be congested quite severely not only at peak time but during normal activities in and around the village hall Prefix:: Mr Your name: Pullen Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Tony Woollett Sent: 17 December 2015 10:58 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:58:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I would like to object to this development Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes, don't build it Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Why have you scheduled a meeting on the 23rd of December when a lot of people who would have liked to have attended will be away for Christmas? Prefix:: Mr Your name: Tony Woollett Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Jane Williams Sent: 17 December 2015 11:50 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:49:45 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Yes, don't build here Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes, don't build here Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Yes, don't build it Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jane Williams Your email Address: Searchers Wildmoor Sherfield on Loddon

Postcode: RG27 0HQ

1 Steve Barker

From: Judith Sullivan Sent: 17 December 2015 12:08 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:07:34 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I would like you to scrap your plans as I think this development will have a detrimental impact on the village. I cannot think of one benefit. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No, I would like you to withdraw your application. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: No Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Judith Sullivan Your email: Address: The Rowans, Bramley Road, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0DA

1 Steve Barker

From: Catriona Hayward Sent: 17 December 2015 13:14 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:14:01 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: This should not go ahead at all. It will create too many houses within a 'village' that we don't have the infrastructure for both locally and for nearby amenities. It will devalue current house prices. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Aside from the comment above, it is obvious to anyone who lives in this village and uses the proposed access road that it simply couldn't take any more traffic. This is a residential road with parking on both sides and a bus route and it is already too busy and hard to travel through. The additional traffic would destroy the road for the 200 or so households there already. This is a village that has suffered from flooding historically especially since the recent addition of 1000s of new houses in Sherfield Park (Taylors Farm). There is inadequate drainage already without a further 100 houses. This development would threaten our 'village' status completely. It will be more on a par with a small town and no one who lives here wants to live in a town. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Catriona Hayward Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Anna Sent: 17 December 2015 13:40 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:39:48 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to this development. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Anna Your email: Address: Poplar House, Poplar Close, Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DX

1 Steve Barker

From: P. Darker Sent: 17 December 2015 17:51 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:51:03 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: This is unnecessary as there are already hundreds of houses planned for the Parish through the Local Plan.

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Goddards Lane, Bow Drive and Bow Grove already do not cope with current traffic and 200 more cars will be unfeasible. The Bramley Road, the crossroads by the Post Office and A33 are already overloaded and will be made a lot worse with all the extra housing planned in Bramley. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: The development is situated in the proposed "Strategic Gap" which will protect the essential green space between Chineham and SoL and Bramley and Sol. Once the Local Plan is made this will be enforced. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: P. Darker Your email: Address: Hafod, Sherfield Green Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Chris Pooles Sent: 17 December 2015 20:07 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:06:47 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The village does not need overdevelopment which is exactly what this will be. the infrastructure both inside and outside the village boundary does not support it. There should be no development in the strategic gap. The village is developing its own neighbourhood plan and that should shape any development in the village (not a parish councillor / land owner with a clear conflict of interest)..

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes - the land and strategic gap in its entirety should not be developed on. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Why were only 215 homes in the village told about the development when the size of it clearly impacts the lives of all residents in the village. Why is the length of consultation period so short for such a big development and potential impact on our lives. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Chris Pooles Your email: Address: West Stow Sherfield Green Sherfield on Loddon

Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Gareth Robinson Sent: 18 December 2015 13:24 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:23:52 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am wholly against this application as I feel it would be detrimental to the Village, and wider communities, in a number of ways. I will expand on these issues when the formal planning application is made. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Gareth Robinson Your email: Address: 22 Bullsdown Close Sherfield on Loddon Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Joan Gould Sent: 20 December 2015 06:23 To: YourViews Subject: Sherfield - Lodden

There has been a survey about what houses are needed in our village, and the vast majority voted for in‐ filling not an estate, there are plans for a lot of houses on the A33,which should bring the housing in the Sherfield parish up to numbers required,why spoil the village road system and access to Bramley road with all the extra traffic that 'the proposed houses will bring.

1 Steve Barker

From: John Walker Sent: 21 December 2015 13:24 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:24:14 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: sacrifice some of the southern buffer zone and build say, low level bungalows. The lower northern footpaths will flood, so will the ditch and water meadow, it always has.bearing in mind the view over the Bramley road more needs to be done to screen view and to be less obtrusive from Bramley Road. High rise buildings should not be above the slope nor the top, preferable no 3 storey blocks The estate WILL NOT emulate Sherfield parrk, It is a village not town developement. iT IS A LOVELY PIECE OF LAND, PLAN WISELY - DON'T SPOIL IT. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: a second access the other end of the bungalows in Bow drive in front of terraced housing and thro the existing garages for those heading to Bramley relieving the serious congestion that may develop on the Old Reading Road which can currently go all the way back to Bow Bridge. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: With so many ex council houses there needs to be more. I do not mean small cheap houses, I mean reasonable sized family houses and garden to rent thro such entities as sentinal housing, not private landlords. Prefix:: Mr Your name: John Walker Your email: Address: 10 Goddards Close, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EG

1 Steve Barker

From: chris hayward Sent: 21 December 2015 22:12 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:12:20 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The best thing to do is to cancel the project altogether Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes, my change would be to cancel the entire proposal and build no additional houses in the area Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Only to cancel the entire project Prefix:: Mr Your name: chris hayward Your email

1 Steve Barker

From: Bethan Pretsell Sent: 22 December 2015 00:01 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:38 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Objection to the building on account of potential flooding issues. Rain water drains into fields well, not so efficiently off Tarmac, paving and off housing facilities. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Do not build houses in a place where access would be difficult and dangerous, where busy roads would become more congested and where the vast majority of the village do not want to see the size of their village increased by 10% . Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: You plans would degrade the strategic gap, a promise made by our MP prior to his election to parliament. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Bethan Pretsell Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Frank Dowling Sent: 22 December 2015 14:05 To: YourViews Subject: Residential Development at Sherfield on Loddon

To Gladman Developments

I write to register my initial objection to the preliminary proposals for a residential development of some 95 houses on land off Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon.

I consider first of all that the scheme is premature pending the adoption of a revised Borough Local Plan.

It also falls within an area identified as a strategic gap between the ever expanding Basingstoke and Sherfield.

In detail, the vehicular access is poor, with effectively all the development being accessed off a single cul‐ de‐sac. This gives onto Bow Drive, Goddards Close and then Goddards Lane. These are not wide roads; they have tight corners with poor forward visibility; and a gross under provision of off street parking resulting in large numbers of on street parking.

Your statement about education is puzzling. You identify that the local Primary School at Bramley has no capacity yet suggest that without your proposed housing development it could be closed!

I question also the stated benefit of cycle links to the village as there are none shown on the plan.

These are just my initial thought and I will prepare a more robust object, should a planning application ever be submitted

Frank Dowling MSc IHBC 11 Bullsdown Close Sherfield on Loddon

1 Steve Barker

From: Sarah Kahr < Sent: 23 December 2015 12:44 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:44:12 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I am deeply unhappy about this development. Sherfield on Loddon village is exactly that - a village - it is in no way capable of supporting such a large development within its boundaries. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Sarah Kahr Your email: Address: 3 Hams Corner Sherfield on Loddon Hook

Postcode: RG27 0HP

1 Steve Barker

From: C Wilson Sent: 24 December 2015 08:34 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 08:34:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Thus is not a master plan as it does detail any consideration to the strategic gap, how water will be drained in an area of flood plain will be a major issue. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes, don't build Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: This development is inappropriate with regard to size and siting, the strain on transport would be unacceptable and will create a negative impact on air quality in a green field area by the increase of traffic through the village. Prefix:: Mr Your name: C Wilson Your email Address: 146 Rockbourne Road Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg27 0sr

1 Steve Barker

From: Jolliffe Sent: 26 December 2015 22:45 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:45:22 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I do not wish this plan to go ahead. Think about the people living in the village. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: You must look somewhere else to build. There are enough houses built in Sherfield Park. Stop bringing more problems into the area. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I really feel strongly against this project. Prefix:: Mr & Mrs Your name: Jolliffe Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Heather Sent: 27 December 2015 19:52 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 19:52:15 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I would like to register my objection to the proposal in its entirety, on the basis that the strategic gap between Sherfield on Loddon and the neighbouring village would disappear. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Heather Your email Address: 5 Mill Close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0AQ

1 Steve Barker

From: Neale Sent: 28 December 2015 09:36 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:36:03 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this proposed development in its entirety. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Leave the area alone and stop trying to profit from opportunistic and speculative ways to defeat the region's properly managed emerging Local Plan. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: You have no interest in our community, and in your own words, all you want to do is gain planning permission and sell the land on to the highest bidder. Why would you think residents of this village would support you if you don't care what the final outcome is ? Prefix:: Mr Your name: Neale Your email: Address: 7 Pound Meadow Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG270EP

1 Steve Barker

From: Neale Sent: 28 December 2015 09:44 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:44:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: This application is completely wrong for Sherfield-on-Loddon and I totally object to it. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Retract the application and leave the community to manage its own living strategy. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Examine your motives and see if you can't come up with any other reason than greed for proposing this development. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Neale Your email: Address: 7 Pound Meadow Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG270EP

1 Steve Barker

From: Neale Sent: 28 December 2015 10:05 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:04:43 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I reject and oppose everything in this plan. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Your brochure is full of hyperbole and unsubstantiated claims. It bears no reality to our community, so stop treating residents like fools. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: You don't care about our village as you don't live here, and have no stake in our community. Your consultation was only done because you have to do so as part of a planning process. You aren't bothered about our responses as you already have the full application mapped-out. See if you can't discover some sort of epiphany and put your efforts into genuine community enrichment instead of personal riches. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Neale Your email Address: 7 Pound Meadow Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG270EP

1 Steve Barker

From: Neale Sent: 28 December 2015 10:16 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 10:15:35 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Yes. I reject your complete plan. I object to any development of the land. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Refrain from applying for outline planning permission. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: The residents have already made it clear they want no development in the village. Stop trying to sneak in an unwelcome application, promising hot- air and imaginary benefits, and that treats us like idiots. Prefix:: Ms Your name: Neale Your email: Address: 7 Pound Meadow Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG270EP

1

Steve Barker

From: Gemma Scott Knight Sent: 01 January 2016 14:52 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:52:15 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this development Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to this development Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Gemma Scott Knight Your email: Address: Old Timbers Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: rg270ed

1 Steve Barker

From: Laurence Cook Sent: 02 January 2016 13:14 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:13:46 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: It is an unnecessary development proposing to be built on the Strategic Gap between Bramley and Sherfield on Loddon and should be opposed vigorously by everyone who cares about the village of Sherfield on Loddon Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: That they be scrapped. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: None Prefix:: Mr Your name: Laurence Cook Your email: Address: Globe House Goddards Lane Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EF

1 Steve Barker

From: Josie Buckley Sent: 02 January 2016 13:26 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 13:25:58 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I don't understand why this proposed development is being built on green field land which has already been designated at the strategic gap between Sherfield on Loddon and Bramley. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I don't want to suggest any changes other than they be dropped altogether Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Josie Buckley Your email: Address: 32 Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: rg27 0ej

1 Steve Barker

From: Terence Horton Sent: 02 January 2016 15:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 15:30:43 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: 47% of British household have 2 cars (RAC Foundation report). With 91 houses this indicates there could be at least 150 extra cars in Sherfield, irrespective of the car allocation standards. What are the parking provisions provided in the development? As most workers travel to work by car (for at least part of their journey) then there will be significant extra cars in Bow Grove between 7.30 and 8.30 each morning causing further tail backs and disruption. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: More space allocated for the parking of cars in the development area as outside the designated area there is no free space for the additional expected vehicles. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Impact on the Bow Grove/Bramley road junction Prefix:: Mr Your name: Terence Horton Your email Address: 11 Poplar Close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg27 0DX

1 Steve Barker

From: Terence Horton Sent: 02 January 2016 15:35 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 15:35:02 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Flooding. The current flood map indicates potential challenges glossed over in your proposal. There are areas of both high and medium risk in the development area

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Additional drainage bypassing Bow Brooke Prefix:: Mr Your name: Terence Horton Your email: Address: 11 Poplar Close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DX

1 Steve Barker

From: Terence Horton Sent: 02 January 2016 15:38 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 15:37:39 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Cycle Tracks. You may include new cycle ways in your plan but there are currently no cycle ways on the main A33 or the C34 hence most journeys will be by car. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Explain the lack of cycle ways outside of the development and admit that cycling, except within the village, is not a practical solution to any journey Prefix:: Mr Your name: Terence Horton Your email: Address: 11 Poplar close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DX

1 Steve Barker

From: Sarah Legge Sent: 03 January 2016 13:45 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:45:22 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Add an additional access point to reduce the amount of traffic congestion around the proposed entrance site. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Create an access point to the proposed development from Goddard's Lane. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: My main concern relates to the highway safety surrounding the site and the availability of parking for the new houses. New housing developments tend to offer very little parking and this impacts the roads in the surrounding area. In fact very few houses in the vicinity of the proposed development have parking. This often causes Goddards Close (leading to the proposed entrance) being restricted to one lane and the corner where Goddard Close meets Bow Drive often being difficult to maneuver, especially when you meet a coach or a bus, which is frequent. You often see these vehicles struggling to drive pass the parked cars. At the moment this is bearable as you tend to only meet one or two cars at the junction. With the proposed 95 houses in a remote location I would expect every house to need a car and a large proportion to need two cars. In fact on our street there are 1.3 cars per household. This would equate to approximately an additional 125 cars using the junction, which could then result in poor traffic conditions and endanger the safety of those using the junction. This is especially the case in the mornings between 7.30am and 8.20am when many, including myself, leave for work. It is also heightened from March to October when the allotment car park, which is at the end of Bow Gardens, becomes increasingly busy with additional traffic and extra cars parked all around the area. Please also consider the implications it will have on the waiting times and access to a Doctor at the local practice. I understand you have spoken to the local doctor's practice but please be aware that housing developments are planned in Bramley and the Doctor Surgery might have underestimated the impact these developments would have on their services. It is important we continue to have good access to medical care and is one of the main reasons we moved out of a town to Sherfield-on-Loddon. I am 27 years old and purchased a property in the area. My friends of a similar age have no plans to move to the area due to the lack of schools in the village, which you have in fact highlighted in your public consultation booklet. They also see it as remote and would prefer a more central location to bring up children. From my experience it is unlikely you will attract the young and less affluent families you so wish to do so. This is escalated by the fact new houses often come with a price premium that many of our age cannot afford. I disagree with your statement the current age demographic of the village are far less likely to use the bus service and would be grateful if you could provide me with evidence confirming this, as well as addressing my concerns mentioned above. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Sarah Legge Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Rowland Sent: 03 January 2016 15:49 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:49:07 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Don't develop your master plan at all. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: As you are not the final developer you have no say in what actually is completed so therefore it is a pointless question to ask. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: What evidence do you have to support this development? Was it supplied by the landowner or Parish Council as the Neighbourhood Development Plan Questionnaire did not identify development on this greenfield site. Please supply to email address the evidence. Many thanks. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Rowland Your email: Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Williams Sent: 03 January 2016 16:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:00:06 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to the plans as a current resident living next to the proposed area. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: An alternative location that would not impact directly on the village centre. Prefix:: Mr & Mrs Your name: Williams Your email: Address: 28 Goddards close sherfield on loddon Postcode: rg270eg the

1 Steve Barker

From: C Burrows < Sent: 03 January 2016 16:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:31:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am not perhaps as strongly opposed as many to the plans in principle, however I feel 95 houses is too many. At even the most conservative of estimates this is an additional 150 (and more likely 200) cars per day trying to move around on what is already a road too congested and unsafe for the purpose – in part due to lack of off- road parking for a large number of houses in the village and particularly along Goddards Close/Bow Grove – a situation rarely improved by modern housing developers who seem to operate on a strictly ‘one car per household’ policy which is entirely unrealistic. Compounded by the village bus route, this is already a stretch of road that requires considerable care for both drivers and walkers/horse riders/cyclists, and the addition of so many extra vehicles leaves open the considerable possibility of accidents. I am also extremely concerned about the modern trend for townhouses, and would be very strongly opposed to any accommodation of this style in the new development. To be in keeping with the village (and to stand any chance of this development being a seamless success within the village and not an outcasted ‘add on’, it must very much become a part of the village) as well as to have a minimal impact on existing countryside views, the new houses can only possibly be a mix of two-storey and bungalows, as per the immediate adjacent housing in Goddards Close/Bow Drive/Bullsdown, and built to a similar style as opposed to garishly modern. It should also be noted that whilst the consultation boards make great reference to existing facilities in the neighbouring village of Bramley being within a 25 minute ‘walking distance’, there is no safe link (other than by car or bus) between the two villages – the main Bramley road is far too fast, busy and unsafe in terms of width and blind corners to entertain walking (or cycling) along it to make use of any facilities (shops, doctors, school etc) in Bramley.

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Footpaths – the proposed ‘landscape buffer’ and ‘public open space’ is a good idea, not only to soften the development and blend it into the existing village but also to encourage countryside access both to new residents and to existing villagers who most likely chose to live in Sherfield due to its countryside feel of being away from the bigger built up areas of Basingstoke – there is a strong dog-walking community, and 30+ horses stabled within the village as well as numerous families and pensioners who enjoy countryside walks/activities to the local green, duckponds and play areas. For this reason I feel the development should be open in the corner of Goddards Lane by Carpenters Farmhouse to allow linking up with existing very popular dog-walking paths going out across farmland to the A33. As there is also a thriving horse community in the village, the possibility of this link being a bridleway and therefore allowing safe access to more of the village roads (new development and old) will help both horse riders and cyclists (both vulnerable user groups who will be affected by increased traffic on the roads due to the new development) stay safe. This is a rural settlement where countryside activities such as these should be encouraged, not 'driven out' by unsafe roads. Less houses – as above an increase of 150-200 car movements twice daily is a worry not just as a driver, but as a mother who walks or cycles regularly with a young child. 1 Access and character – I would urge the planners to look at alternatives to a single ‘main access and loop’ style of development as seen in so many new housing estates. These ultimately seem to lead to massive congestion and ‘bottlenecks’ and have nothing in keeping with the current character of the village’s roads. There is a large existing network of footpaths within the village, and I think as many as possible should be continued into and around any new development to help it become a joined up part of the village accessible to both new residents and old. Building style is also of prime importance – modern estate-style townhouses simply will not blend into this rural village.

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Sherfield on Loddon is a long-standing community that has suffered little change over recent years. For this reason, as well as concerns above regarding traffic/road congestion and safety, I think it is vital that any new development of such size is done incredibly sympathetically, if at all. It needs to take into account not just the character of the village, but that of the residents, who are strongly opposed to change. Any new housing needs to be built very much in character with existing buildings, and the addition of extra traffic and residents needs to be carefully thought out. I do in many ways appreciate the need for increased housing, and there is a small part of me that would welcome the addition of housing for younger families such as ours, as it is incredibly difficult to buy into the village, however the reasons we (and so many others) chose to buy in Sherfield is because of its innate village quality, and I would be extremely sorry to see the village turned into yet another suburb of Basingstoke – something that could so easily be done in this case if care is not taken to fit the plans into the existing settlement.

Prefix:: Mrs Your name: C Burrows Your email: t Address: 23 Goddards Close, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EG

2 Steve Barker

From: attwood Sent: 03 January 2016 18:43 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 18:42:40 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: We object to all aspects of the proposed plan, due to the lack of infrastructure in all areas. Prefix:: Mr & Mrs Your name: attwood Your email: j Address: jubilee cottage, greenway,sherfield on loddon,hook Postcode: rg270ed

1 Steve Barker

From: Lynn Tarrant Sent: 04 January 2016 21:38 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:37:42 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: the village does not require anymore houses as schools and doctors surgery will not be able to cope with more children in the school due to it being a village school and the doctors will be at capacity and more traffic on the roads would not help with the safety of children Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Don't build the houses Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Think of the conservation gap and all the wildlife that will lose their habitate Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Lynn Tarrant Your email: Address: 15 Bow Drive Sherfeild on Loddon Hook Postcode: RG27 0EQ

1 Steve Barker

From: Jayne Sent: 04 January 2016 21:49 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:49:07 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Don't build it Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Don't build it Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to the plans, don't build it. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Jayne Your email: Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Townsend Sent: 04 January 2016 21:56 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:55:52 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to development of this site and details of my objections will be sent the the planning department of Basingstoke & Deane Council when I have seen the finalised planning application. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Townsend Your email: Address: 19 Northfield Road, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: C van Niekerk Sent: 04 January 2016 22:24 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:23:33 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly disagree that this should go ahead Prefix:: Mr Your name: C van Niekerk Your email: Address: Meadow corner Postcode: Rg270dw

1 Steve Barker

From: Robert Sullivan Sent: 04 January 2016 21:37 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:36:54 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: It is not clear to me what your masterplan is but it is clear your proposal is very likely to cause a significant negative impact to the village. For that reason I don't wish to help you shape it. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Relocation of the additional housing to a site that has been identified by the Local Borough Counsel in the draft plan. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to this proposal and I will do the same in relation to any application, providing a more comprehensive explanation for my objection at such stage. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Robert Sullivan Your email: Address: Rowans, Bramley Road, Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DA

1 Steve Barker

From: Chris Spencer Sent: 04 January 2016 22:08 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:08:29 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Money grabbing cunts Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Money grabbing cunts Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: money grabbing cunts Prefix:: Mr Your name: Chris Spencer Your email: Address: 7 Goddards Close

Postcode: Rg270eg

1 Steve Barker

From: J. Snell Sent: 04 January 2016 21:27 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:26:59 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Do not want your proposed development to be built in our village. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: J. Snell Your email: Address: 6 Breach Gardens,Sherfield on Loddon, Hook, Hants Postcode: RG27 0AW

1 Steve Barker

From: G A SNELL Sent: 04 January 2016 21:25 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:24:42 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Do not want your proposed development to be built in our village. Prefix:: Mr Your name: G A SNELL Your email: Address: 6 Breach Gardens,Sherfield on Loddon, Hook, Hants Postcode: RG27 0AW

1 Steve Barker

From: Tracey Smart Sent: 04 January 2016 22:10 To: YourViews Subject: Re planning on Sherfield on Loddon

I object to any planning in Sherfield on Loddon of the new development intended as I moved here in 2003 wanting to live in a small undeveloped village with only one shop, pub and post office and if I wanted to moved on to an housing estate, I would of done so. The roads are already overcrowed with cars on a weekend without any more traffic coming through our village. So I object to this planning going ahead.

Sent from my iPhone

1 Steve Barker

From: G Shaw < Sent: 04 January 2016 18:54 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:53:45 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Changing use from farm open land to development is totally inappropriate for this village so please look elsewhere - maybe somewhere that already has development or already has an infrastructure to cope Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Ideally no development at all in this very small village but if inevitable then development of no more than 10 houses Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: What plans do you have for the potential 190 cars to access the A33 please. Also the school and doctors are already full up so how do you assess the extra people will be serviced. The only access to the A33 is via a very small junction between the pub and the post office. At peak times the queues are way down the road to Bramley and that is of great concern to us villagers. We are also concerned that such a large development will stretch current resources beyond coping limits. Prefix:: Ms Your name: G Shaw Your email: Address: 9 Breach Gardens Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG270AW

1 Steve Barker

From: Katherine Sent: 04 January 2016 21:29 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:29:10 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to this development Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Katherine Your email: Scott Address: 36 Postcode: Rg27 0eg

1 Steve Barker

From: Ian Scott Sent: 04 January 2016 21:41 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:40:59 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I STRONGLY OBJECT TO THIS DEVELOPMENT !!! Prefix:: Mr Your name: Ian Scott Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Sarah < Sent: 04 January 2016 22:44 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:44:00 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Think this is an awful idea and will ruin the whole atmosphere of the village. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Don't do it. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Keeping the country side and the land around the village is important Prefix:: Miss Your name: Sarah Your email

1 Steve Barker

From: Jamie Sent: 04 January 2016 22:14 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:14:27 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I completely object to the proposed development as it will alter the character of the village in a very detrimental way. In addition, the infrastructure will not be able to cope with the increased demands place on it by this development - the road access leading to the development is already at capacity and the development will make it considerably more dangerous for children in the village. The removal of this agricultural land will further move Sherfield on Loddon from an attractive and historic village, and turn it into urban sprawl. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Leave the land as an agriculture field. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Jamie Your email: Riddell Address: Goddard's Lane, Sherfield on Loddon, Hants Postcode: RG27 0EL

1 Steve Barker

From: de Redenat-Strange Sent: 04 January 2016 21:47 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:46:51 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The village is not appropriate for this size of development. Roads are insufficient and your making a rural area urban!!! Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Don't build anymore in this area !! Prefix:: Mrs Your name: de Redenat-Strange Your email: Address: Bramble cottage Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg26 0da

1 Steve Barker

From: Pat Ralph Sent: 04 January 2016 21:36 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:35:30 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Only that I wish to object to this development on the ground that it will do no good for the village Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Pat Ralph Your email: Address: 6 willow way Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg270du 0DU

1 Steve Barker

From: Mr Mike Ralph Sent: 04 January 2016 21:34 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:34:07 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Only that I wish to object to this development on the ground that it will do no good for the village Prefix:: Mr Your name: Mr Mike Ralph Your email: Address: 6 willow way Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg270du 0DU

1 Steve Barker

From: Rache Sent: 04 January 2016 21:45 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:45:20 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to this and hope you fail miserably. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Rachel Your email Address: 1 Cornwall Cottage, Greenway, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Postcode: RG27 0EE

1 Steve Barker

From: James Pretsell Sent: 04 January 2016 21:56 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:55:35 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object for a variety of reasons. Prefix:: Mr Your name: James Pretsell Your email: Address: Bullsdown View, Reading Rd, Sherfield on Loddon, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EX

1 Steve Barker

From: Andrew Pearson Sent: 04 January 2016 22:09 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:09:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: There is not the infrastructure in place to accommodate this number of new homes, there are is no train facility near by and with one bus an hour to basingstoke, there will be a need for circa 200 cars for these residents to go about their daily lives. This will put undue pressure on all near by roads and will make the already busy Bramley road even worse for our children to cross as there is no facility in place for them to cross safely Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: the project is put on hold until all residents in sherfield on loddon have had a chance to review any plans submitted Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: My current status is too object to these plans Prefix:: Mr Your name: Andrew Pearson Your email: Address: 66 Northfield road Postcode: RG27 0DS

1 Steve Barker

From: K pearman Sent: 04 January 2016 21:26 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:25:43 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to this plan Prefix:: Mrs Your name: K pearman Your email: Address: Sunny side, greenway Sheffield-on-London Postcode: RG27 0EE

1 Steve Barker

From: Owen Sent: 04 January 2016 21:42 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:41:43 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: We do not agree with this proposal for potential residential development. Prefix:: Mr & Mrs Your name: Owen Your email: Address: 16 Bullsdown Close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: T Owen Sent: 04 January 2016 21:44 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:43:50 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I do not agree with this proposal for potential residential development. Prefix:: Mr Your name: T Owen Your email Address: 16 Bullsdown Close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Oliver Sent: 04 January 2016 21:32 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:31:33 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I disagree with this development Prefix:: Mr Your name: Oliver Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Paul O'Grady Sent: 04 January 2016 21:08 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:07:57 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Please do not build. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Please do not build. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Please do not build. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Paul O'Grady Your email: Address: Fieldways, Bramley Road, Sherfield On Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DG

1 Steve Barker

From: Clare Oakes Sent: 04 January 2016 21:58 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:58:03 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to the plans to build on this piece of land. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I will submit a formal objection once the formal plans are provided. Prefix:: Ms Your name: Clare Oakes Your email: Address: 55 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon, HOOK Hants Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: None of your businesa Sent: 04 January 2016 22:03 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:02:54 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: My house will overlook the development. I don't want to see houses and lines of cars. I like the fields and greenery..this is why we moved here. The schools already struggle, the Dr's are busy..we don't want a built up estate full of drop outs and hundreds of new residents pulling the village down. Growth is not good! Leave us as we are! Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Do it somewhere else. Don't wreck the beautiful countryside. . It floods here..it's flooded now. Your stats on water allowance are flawed. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Stop trying to cash in, develop downtrodden areas that need new homes by takin down the old ones. There is no need to develop Sherfield other than personal financial gain of the developers and the corrupt landowner! Prefix:: Mrs Your name: None of your businesa Your email: Postcode: Rg27 0ej

1 Steve Barker

From: Robert Miller Sent: 04 January 2016 21:55 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:54:30 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Completely object to the development Prefix:: Mr Your name: Robert Miller Your email: Address: 23 Bullsdown Close Sherfield-on-Loddon Hook Hants Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: David Miller Sent: 04 January 2016 21:49 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:48:31 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I will be strongly objecting against this development. Prefix:: Mr Your name: David Miller Your email: Address: 4 Willow Way, Sherfield on Loddon Hook Hants Postcode: RG27 0DU

1 Steve Barker

From: Milicent Sent: 04 January 2016 21:54 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:53:33 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I completely oppose your planned development on this site under any conditions. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Milicent Your email: Www. Postcode: Rg270eg

1 Steve Barker

From: MAY MACQUEEN Sent: 04 January 2016 21:47 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:46:53 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I do not agree with this proposed development as I am concerned with the extra volume of traffic as the village already has problems in this area Prefix:: Mrs Your name: MAY MACQUEEN Your email: Address: 2 GODDARDS CLOSE SHERFILED ON LODDON HOOK HAMPSHIRE Postcode: RG270EG

1 Steve Barker

From: William Lee Sent: 04 January 2016 22:07 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:06:34 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I absolutely disagree with this proposed development and would be eager to have my specific views considered at an eventual planning meeting. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Not at this time. Prefix:: Mr Your name: William Lee Your email: Address: Holly House, Sherfield Green, Sherfield-on-Loddon. Hampshire> Postcode: RG27 0EN.

1 Steve Barker

From: Natalie Larner < Sent: 04 January 2016 22:42 To: YourViews Subject: Objection to proposed development, Sherfield on Loddon

I strongly object to the proposed development north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield on Loddon. Natalie Larner RG27 0DQ

1 Steve Barker

From: M Larner Sent: 04 January 2016 22:40 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:39:50 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to the proposed development north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield on Loddon. Prefix:: Mr Your name: M Larner Your email: Postcode: RG27 0DQ

1 Steve Barker

From: sarah lacy-smith Sent: 04 January 2016 22:20 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:19:37 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I am concerned about having a possible 200 cars driving down a road which isn't built for it, and is used frequently for children and dog walkers to cross. Will there be any improvements to these, i.e. pedestrian crossing? Prefix:: Miss Your name: sarah lacy-smith Your email: Address: Lydford House, bramley road, sherfield on loddon, hook, Hampshire Postcode: rg270da

1 Steve Barker

From: J Lacy-Smith Sent: 04 January 2016 21:46 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:46:18 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this deveolpment Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: the plan is out of keeping with the surroundings which can not support this develpment Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: please stop this plan Prefix:: Mr Your name: J Lacy-Smith Your email: Address: Lydford House Bramley Road Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DA

1 Steve Barker

From: B Lacy-Smith Sent: 04 January 2016 21:24 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:24:09 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I totally object to this development Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Inappropriate site for development Prefix:: Mrs Your name: B Lacy-Smith Your email: Address: Lydford House Bramley Road Postcode: RG27 0DA

1 Steve Barker

From: Jeannette kirby Sent: 04 January 2016 21:32 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:31:37 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to the above plan on many fronts Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jeannette kirby Your email: Address: 39 bow drive Sheffield on loddon Hook Postcode: RG270EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Tom Kenny Sent: 04 January 2016 22:27 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:27:17 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THE PROPOSAL Prefix:: Mr Your name: Tom Kenny Your email: Address: 20 Northfield Road, Sherfield on Loddon, Hants Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Sylvia < Sent: 04 January 2016 22:26 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:25:46 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I oppose Prefix:: Ms Your name: Sylvia Your email: Address: 1 Cornwall Cottage, Greenway, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hants Postcode: RG27 0EE

1 Steve Barker

From: Sarah Kenny Sent: 04 January 2016 22:32 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:31:35 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THE PROPOSAL Prefix:: Miss Your name: Sarah Kenny Your email: Address: 20 Northfield Road, Sherfield on Loddon, Hants Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Owen Kenny Sent: 04 January 2016 22:24 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:24:15 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THE PROPOSAL Prefix:: Mr Your name: Owen Kenny Your email: Address: 20 Northfield Road, Sherfield on Loddon, Hants Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: NICOLA KENNY Sent: 04 January 2016 21:42 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:42:29 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I OBJECT STRONGLY TO THIS PROPOSAL. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: NICOLA KENNY Your email: Address: 20 Northfield Road, Sherfield on Loddon, Hook, Hants, Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Kay Sent: 04 January 2016 21:33 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:32:55 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Object to this development Prefix:: Miss Your name: Kay Your email: Postcode: Rg27 0eg

1 Steve Barker

From: Kate Sent: 04 January 2016 21:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:30:37 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to this development Prefix:: Miss Your name: Kate Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Mark Kahr Sent: 04 January 2016 22:08 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:08:11 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to any development plans in Sherfield on Loddon Prefix:: Mr Your name: Mark Kahr Your email Address: 3 Hams Corner, Sherfield On Loddon, Hook Hants Postcode: RG27 0HP

1 Steve Barker

From: Peter Jordan Sent: 04 January 2016 21:36 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:35:51 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object totally to this proposal. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Peter Jordan Your email: Address: The Coach House Reading Road Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EX

1 Steve Barker

From: Jane Jordan Sent: 04 January 2016 21:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:31:29 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this proposal. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jane Jordan Your email Address: The Coach House Reading Road Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EX

1 Steve Barker

From: Ian < Sent: 04 January 2016 22:23 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:23:03 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Stop the process and back away Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Traffic, schooling, drainage and other infrastructure concerns make this development untenable Prefix:: Mr Your name: Ian Your email: Elvar Address: 8 Bullsdown Close Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: S Holden Sent: 04 January 2016 21:33 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:32:30 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Totally against this, hope that this development does not go ahead. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: S Holden Your email: Address: Willow way Sherfield on loddon

1 Steve Barker

From: Jan holden Sent: 04 January 2016 22:27 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:26:32 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Needs to include a variety of different types of housing. New starters, those looking to downsize and growing families Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Review access to estate and consider impact on those residences close to it Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Look to see what could be provided to improve/benefit the local community as well Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jan holden Your email Postcode: RG 27 0 JB

1 Steve Barker

From: G Holden Sent: 04 January 2016 22:52 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:52:23 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: The village is to capacity, this would not work here, strongly object Prefix:: Mr Your name: G Holden Your email Address: Willow way Sherfield on loddon

1 Steve Barker

From: Sharon Hewins Sent: 04 January 2016 23:19 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:18:49 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly oppose the decision to build a new housing development on this land. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I strongly oppose the decision to build a new housing development on this land. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly oppose the decision to build a new housing development on this land. This directly affects me and my family. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Sharon Hewins Your email: Address: 10 Bow Grove, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hants Postcode: RG27 0DT

1 Steve Barker

From: Daren Hewins Sent: 04 January 2016 23:03 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:02:41 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to the development Prefix:: Mr Your name: Daren Hewins Your email: Address: 10 Bow Grove, Sherfield on Loddon, Hook, Hants Postcode: RG27 0DT

1 Steve Barker

From: Paul Henderson Sent: 04 January 2016 22:23 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:23:19 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object, our children play in the street with many others, our road cannot cope with the traffic as is Prefix:: Mr Your name: Paul Henderson Your email: Address: 27 bow drive Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Louise Sent: 04 January 2016 21:48 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:48:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Yes Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I think a village should stay as a village. Not living in the area but visiting often, this is a tight family-like village where everyone knows everyone and I think building more housing in the area is only going to defeat the object of this lovely warming place which is a village. I would reconsider building this beautiful place up and removing scenery for the local people will cause argument. Please reconsider its a lovely place which shouldn't be replace nor be built on any more. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Louise Your email: Address: 56 Quintilis Postcode: Rg127qq

1 Steve Barker

From: Erin Henderson Sent: 04 January 2016 22:15 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:15:17 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object! Prefix:: Miss Your name: Erin Henderson Your email: Address: 56 Quintilis Bracknell Berkshire Postcode: RG12 7QQ

1 Steve Barker

From: Hannah Sent: 04 January 2016 23:02 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:02:26 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I don't believe it's a good idea Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Don't do it Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Please don't do it Prefix:: Miss Your name: Hannah Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Kim groves Sent: 04 January 2016 22:13 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:13:19 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly object Prefix:: Miss Your name: Kim groves Your email: Address: Berkshire Postcode: Rg12 9yl

1 Steve Barker

From: Lisa Goodall Sent: 04 January 2016 21:15 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:15:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object in all respects. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Lisa Goodall Your email Address: Fernleigh, Goddard's Lane Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EF

1 Steve Barker

From: Ian Goodall < Sent: 04 January 2016 20:57 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 20:56:59 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to the intended plans Prefix:: Mr Your name: Ian Goodall Your email:

1 Steve Barker

From: Goddard Sent: 04 January 2016 22:20 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:20:03 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Please do not build on this beautiful land. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Goddard Your email: [email protected]

1 Steve Barker

From: Valerie Gile Sent: 04 January 2016 21:11 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:11:14 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Please do not build. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Please do not build. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Please do not build. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Valerie Giles Your email: Address: Fieldways, Bramley Road, Sherfield On Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DG

1 Steve Barker

From: Luke Gaiger Sent: 04 January 2016 22:24 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:23:51 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Withdraw them,I don't want your development here. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Luke Gaiger Your email Address: 3 Devonshire Cottages,Sherfield Green Postcode: rg270ed

1 Steve Barker

From: Erin Gaiger < Sent: 04 January 2016 22:19 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:19:26 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Withdraw them,I don't want your development here Prefix:: Miss Your name: Erin Gaiger Your email Address: 3 Devonshire Cottages,Sherfield Green Postcode: rg270ed

1 Steve Barker

From: Ashlene Gaiger Sent: 04 January 2016 22:22 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:21:39 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Withdraw them,I don't want your development here. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Ashlene Gaiger Your email: Address: 3 Devonshire Cottages,Sherfield Green Postcode: rg270ed

1 Steve Barker

From: Abbie Gaiger Sent: 04 January 20 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:26:57 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Withdraw them,I don't want your development here. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Abbie Gaiger Your email: Address: 3 Devonshire Cottages,Sherfield Green Postcode: rg270ed

1 Steve Barker

From: Ian Fellows Sent: 04 January 2016 23:38 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:38:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Yes, I am totally opposed to this proposed development in Sherfield-on-Loddon Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes, withdraw them altogether, they are not appropriate to the area Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Not at this present time Prefix:: Mr Your name: Ian Fellows Your email Address: 45 Bow Drive, Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Barbara Sent: 04 January 2016 23:40 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:40:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am totally opposed to this development in Sherfield on Loddon Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No none except to say that it should not go ahead at all Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: No Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Barbara Your email: Fellows Address: 45 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon, Postcode: RG270EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Emily Sent: 04 January 2016 21:51 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:51:08 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this plan Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I don't think this is a good idea Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I fully object Prefix:: Miss Your name: Emily Your email: Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Diana Effiong Sent: 04 January 2016 21:53 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:53:09 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I wish to object to this developement Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Diana Effiong Your email: Address: Sherfield On loddon

1 Steve Barker

From: Justin d'Orville Sent: 04 January 2016 22:09 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:09:12 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I know Sherfield-on-Lodden well and strongly oppose the proposal of this development so close to the village. There is way too much new construction going on in the Home Counties and quaint villages such a Sherfield-on-Lodden are becoming far and few between! Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: There are many run down areas that would benefit from being demolished and nice new houses built in there place rather than take up more of oir valuable countryside and ruin the lovely, local villages. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Justin d'Orville Your email Address: 3, The Barons, 56 Station Road, Frimley, Camberley, Surrey Postcode: GU16 7HF

1 Steve Barker

From: Gary Dodkins < Sent: 04 January 2016 22:32 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:32:00 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly object Your name: Gary Dodkins Your email Address: 3 Fernhill Place Sherfield on Loddon Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0SJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Fiona Dodkins

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:29:41 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly object Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Fiona Dodkins Your email: Address: 3 Fernhill Place Sheffield on Loddon Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0Sj

1 Steve Barker

From: simon Sent: 04 January 2016 22:39 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:39:12 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I will be opposing your plans for the building of houses on this site if planning is sought. Prefix:: Mr Your name: simon Your email Address: The laurels.Greenway sherfield on loddon Postcode: RG27 0EZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Louise Dodd Sent: 04 January 2016 22:47 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:47:04 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Not go forward with them. spend the money on a play park or new football / rugby posts. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I will oppose the plans for this development if planning is sought. Everyone in the village and surrounding area loved this area of land and to have houses on it would ruin the atmosphere of Sherfield on loddon which is an old and very well established village. Prefix:: Miss Your name: Louise Dodd Your email Address: Pentewan, Holly bush Lane, West Heath, Baughurst, Tadley RG265LB Postcode: RG265LB

1 Steve Barker

From: Phillipa Davidson-Blake Sent: 04 January 2016 22:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:31:21 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I would not support a development on this site. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Phillipa Davidson-Blake Your email: Address: Milkwood, Sherfield Green, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Michael Davidson-Blake Sent: 04 January 2016 22:30 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:29:55 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: This development would not be supported by me Prefix:: Mr Your name: Michael Davidson-Blake Your email: Address: Milkwood, Sherfield Green, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Alice Davidson-Blake Sent: 04 January 2016 22:27 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:27:16 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to this development Prefix:: Miss Your name: Alice Davidson-Blake Your email: Address: Milkwood, Sherfield Green, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: James Croucher Sent: 04 January 2016 22:15 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:14:58 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly object Your name: James Croucher Your email: j

1 Steve Barker

From: Clements Sent: 04 January 2016 22:30 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:30:11 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to your plans and will oppose any planning application. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Clements Your emai

1 Steve Barker

From: S W Clements Sent: 04 January 2016 23:23 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:22:51 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to this development Prefix:: Mr Your name: S W Clements Your email: Address: 59 Northfield Road Sherfield-on-Loddon Hook Hants Postcode: RG270DS

1 Steve Barker

From: Sophie Clarke Sent: 04 January 2016 22:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:00:20 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The infrastructure of this village is unable to cope with these additional homes in this particular location. The roads are already overloaded, making it difficult to pass through, dangerous to cross and hazardous for buses and emergency vehicles. The local school is full and unable to accommodate the children that will no doubt be living in these houses. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Build a new school and create alternative access arrangements. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to these plans. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Sophie Clarke Your email Address: 9 Hams Corner, Sherfield On Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0HP

1 Steve Barker

From: Jaison Clarke Sent: 04 January 2016 22:29 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:28:37 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: As a resident of the Sherfield village I have serious concerns regarding the location and large amount of home planned in the area. The current corner of Sherfield on Loddon is not prepared for such a increase of traffic and currently has a large amount of road parked cars which can make access single file. Your current masterplan does not currently consider the values and feel of the village. Something that can not be obtained from blueprints and aerial photography. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: To add such a large amount of homes in such a small village will require the addition of new roads and access directly to the site and also a public school to provide the educational facilities required. Nearby Bramley school is currently full and the development at Sherfield park also failed to provide a school provision which has increased pressure on Chineham and Lychpit schools. The development currently does not consider any of these commodities. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: My family and i moved to Sherfield due to its quite country village feel, away from the residential bustle in nearby towns. We enjoy quite walks around the houses where noise and traffic is minimal. The surrounding countryside and green fields segregates Sherfield giving it a unique and attractive identity. To allow such a large modern development to be constructed within the village would severely threaten the core of what is good about this village. The nearby extensive development at Sherfield park came close to damaging the village however distance sought to prevent this. This area is a vital barrier in protecting the village and everything should be done to maintain this. However I appreciate that in this world beautiful things are often ruined for financial gain. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Jaison Clarke Your email: Address: 9 Hams Corner, Sherfield On Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0HP

1 Steve Barker

From: LYNNE CHALWIN Sent: 04 January 2016 21:35 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:34:45 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this development as the village is not able to cope with this amount of housing. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Access to the site is my main worry and the added amount of traffic this development would create on our already full to capacity village roads. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: LYNNE CHALWIN Your email Address: 41 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: ALAN CHALWIN Sent: 04 January 2016 21:30 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:30:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this development mainly due to the current infrastructure not being able to cope with any more housing in this area of the village. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: There are no changes that could improve the proposals. Prefix:: Mr Your name: ALAN CHALWIN Your email: Address: 41 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Dianne Cayzer Sent: 04 January 2016 22:43 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:42:57 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I believe that this proposal should be opposed. The village is not able to sustain such an increase in housing. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Withdraw the proposal. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Traffic congestion in Goddards Lane is already unsustainable and these new homes would only increase disruption. The village does not have the infrastructure to take these new homes. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Dianne Cayzer Your email Address: 14 Northfield Road Sherfield on Loddon

Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Roy Burrow Sent: 04 January 2016 21:57 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:57:06 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Don't agree this is the best thing for the village & residents Prefix:: Mr Your name: Roy Burrows Your email Address: 3 Bow Grove Sherfield On Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DT

1 Steve Barker

From: Jean Burrows Sent: 04 January 2016 21:51 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:50:32 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No I do not agree with the development. There appears to be no thought for the village & its residents. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jean Burrows Your email Address: 3 Bow Grove Sherfield On Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DT

1 Steve Barker

From: Ian Bryant Sent: 04 January 2016 22:12 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:11:59 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Just that I totally disagree with this proposal that clearly contravenes a number of basic guidelines on development and offers nothing positive to the village other than to line the pockets of a few greedy few. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Not at this stage. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Ian Bryant Your email: Address: Holly House, Sherfield Green, Sherfield-on-Loddon. Hampshire. Postcode: RG27 0EN.

1 Steve Barker

From: Alison Bryan Sent: 04 January 2016 22:03 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:03:22 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I totally disagree with this proposed development and would be eager to have my specific objections aired at an eventual planning meeting. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Not at this stage. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Alison Bryant Your email: Address: Holly House, Sherfield Green, Sherfield-on-Loddon. Hampshire. Postcode: RG27 0EN.

1 Steve Barker

From: Stuart Brownen Sent: 04 January 2016 22:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:00:08 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to this proposed development. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I object to the proposals. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Please consider that I do not welcome the proposed development. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Stuart Brownen Your email

1 Steve Barker

From: Joe Brownen Sent: 04 January 2016 22:03 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:02:53 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to the proposed development Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I object to the proposed development Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to the proposed development Prefix:: Mr Your name: Joe Brownen Your email

1 Steve Barker

From: Jacqueline Brownen Sent: 04 January 2016 21:54 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:54:02 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I wholeheartedly object to this development Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I wholeheartedly object to this development Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I wholeheartedly object to this development Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jacqueline Brownen Your email: Address: 9 Goddards Close Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EG

1 Steve Barker

From: Ben Brownen Sent: 04 January 2016 22:02 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:02:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to this development Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I strongly object to this development Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to this development Prefix:: Mr Your name: Ben Brownen Your email: Address: Goddards Close, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hants Postcode: rg270eg

1 Steve Barker

From: Maralyn Braybroo Sent: 04 January 2016 23:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:00:16 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to this development proposal Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Maralyn Braybrook Your email: Address: 13 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EQ

1 Steve Barker

From: Emma Bray Sent: 04 January 2016 22:26 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:26:01 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: OBJECT Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: OBJECT Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: OBJECT Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Emma Bray Your email Address: 25 Goddards close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg27 0eg

1 Steve Barker

From: Karl bray Sent: 04 January 2016 22:34 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:33:46 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Object to your plans, and have no further comments at this time. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No comment at this time. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: No comment at this time. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Karl bray Your email Address: 25 Goddards Close, Sherfield On Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG270EG

1 Steve Barker

From: Mark Bradley Sent: 04 January 2016 21:30 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:30:19 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Having looked at your proposal I believe that the development is inappropriate for the location and conflicts with the intent to maintain the Stratigic gap between the village and the urban area of north Basingstoke, Chineham. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: The development raises several environmental,infrastructure and sustainability issues that would have a detrimental effect on the surrounding area. Your name: Mark Bradley Your email: Address: 13 Bullsdown Close Sherfield on Loddon Hook Hampshire Postcode: RG270DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Jenny Bradle Sent: 04 January 2016 21:42 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:42:10 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Having studied your plans I feel they are not appropriate for the area. I'm opposed to the development as I feel it will have a detrimental impact on my life. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I do not believe that the impact of this development has been fully explored and the impact on the local area and infrastructure has been understood. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Jenny Bradley Your email: Address: 13 Bullsdown Close Sherfield on Loddon

Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Alex biffen Sent: 04 January 2016 21:46 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:46:28 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Do it in Bramley not in sherfield Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Don't do it Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Do not let this happen I have love in sherfield for 20 years and I like how we are staying the same unlike Bramley which is going down hill with an increase in crime rate since the new houses were built there Prefix:: Mr Your name: Alex biffen Your email Address: Willow brook Branley road sherfield on loddon hook hants rg270df Postcode: Rg270df

1 Steve Barker

From: Alan berry Sent: 04 January 2016 23:10 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:10:08 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Strongly object Prefix:: Mr Your name: Alan berry Your email: Address: 6 shy-shack lane, baughurst, tadley rg265nh Postcode: Rg265nh

1 Steve Barker

From: Fred Berntsen Sent: 04 January 2016 21:56 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:55:42 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I firmly object to the proposed plan. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Fred Berntsen Your email Address: Sherfield on loddon

1 Steve Barker

From: Bennett Sent: 04 January 2016 21:17 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:17:19 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: We strongly object to any housing development in this area Prefix:: Mr & Mrs Your name: Bennett Your emai Address: 57 Bow Drive ,Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Oliver Bartrum Sent: 04 January 2016 13:01 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:00:55 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object and see no reason why I should help improve your master plan. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Oliver Bartrum Your email Postcode: RG270EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Catherine Bartru Sent: 04 January 2016 21:36 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:36:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to this plan and reserve my comments. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Catherine Bartrum Your email Postcode: RG27 0EN

1 Steve Barker

From: Koren Barret Sent: 04 January 2016 22:34 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:34:10 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strong object Prefix:: Miss Your name: Koren Barrett Your email

1 Steve Barker

From: j barnard Sent: 04 January 2016 21:47 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:47:00 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: myself and wife are totally against this houseing Your name: j barnard Your email: j barnard Address: 1 bullsdown close, sherfield on loddon Postcode: rg27 0dz

1 Steve Barker

From: Kevin Atkinso Sent: 04 January 2016 23:02 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:01:47 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to this development proposal Prefix:: Mr Your name: Kevin Atkinson Your ema Address: 13 Bow Drive, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0EQ

1 Steve Barker

From: Archer Sent: 04 January 2016 23:10 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:09:34 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: THIS PROPOSAL IS TOTALLY OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE RURAL NATURE OF SOL. - The proposals would have an unacceptable adverse impact on the greenbelt between SoL & Chineham/Basingstoke. - This land has never been allocated for housing development. - The proposal appears to be for a 'housing estate' next to a conservation area. SoL is a rural village in every aspect - this proposal is totally out of character with the rural nature of the village. - It appears the developers have speculatively bought a plot of land and are 'trying their luck' to impose an unsuited development on a rural village. I assume the developers think they can 'outsmart' BDBC council officers and use planning loopholes to 'sneak through' an application. I trust the BDBC council officers are not daft enough to allow this proposal to go through. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: SUGGEST THE PROPOSALS ARE WITHDRAWN. In addition to my above comments, road access would be an absolute nightmare.

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I STRONGLY OBJECT TO THIS PROPOSAL. I WILL DEFINITELY OBJECT TO ANY PLANNING APPLICATION.(IF SUBMITTED). Much of the FAQ's appear to be a lazy 'copy & paste' from similar housing estates. For example, I know Section 4 (Schools) is simply wrong, as I have children who attend the local primary school. Furthermore, the comment that "if new development does not take place in Sherfield-on-Loddon then in 20 years’ time it could resemble a retirement community" are clearly not the words of a responsible developer. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Archer Your email Address: 24 Northfield Road Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Laura arche Sent: 04 January 2016 22:35 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:35:26 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The village is already congested and with the bus route along bow drive it will cause potential accidents and chaos. There is a need for houses but there are already 2 huge existing developments within a mile away and the proposed razors farm. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No changes just build elsewhere. Too many new houses in the area with too many social housing..just use Bramley Green as an example Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Laura archer Your email: Address: 24 northfield road, Sherfield on loddon, Rg27 0dr Postcode: Rg27 0dr

1 Steve Barker

From: Mark Angel Sent: 04 January 2016 21:57 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:56:34 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I wish to register my objection to this plan Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: I wish to register my objection to this plan Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I wish to register my objection to this plan Prefix:: Mr Your name: Mark Angell Your email Address: 5 pound meadow sherfield-on-loddon Postcode: rg270ep

1 Steve Barker

From: Helen Angel Sent: 04 January 2016 22:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:59:51 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I wish to register my objection to this plan. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Please see comments above Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Helen Angell Your email Address: 5 Pound Meadow Sherfield-on-loddon Postcode: RG27 0EP

1 Steve Barker

From: Alex Sent: 04 January 2016 23:51 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 23:51:21 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: 'Masterplan'? Are you intending on building a Death Star? Only hollywood villains use the word masterplan, so I am rather concerned about your intentions for our otherwise evil-genius-free village. Should you be intending on building an evil lair I'm sure Dr Evil would be happy to assist, and I believe you can probably find some plutonium at the nearby Atomic Weapons Establishment to aid in your world domination. Sherfield On Loddon wouldn't be where I would start, but you are the one with the 'masterplan' Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: In order to improve on your 'masterplan' I have a few recommendations i'd like to suggest. Firstly, in order to be both cost effective and reduce your carbon footprint, I strongly recommend constructing your buildings from either straw or sticks. Two of the Three Little Pigs used both of these natural recyclable resources, and we all know that it worked out pretty great for them! Although I would suggest that you advise homeowners of acquiring hurricane insurance. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: As you can probably tell I will be strongly opposing to this plan should it go ahead. I also have the support of Luke Skywalker and James Bond, who know a thing or two about dealing with 'masterplan's. I will not hesitate to contact them or my good friend Liam Neeson, who's particular set of protest skills which make him a nightmare for people like you Prefix:: Mr Your name: Alex Your email

1 Steve Barker

From: lynsey McDonald Sent: 05 January 2016 0 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:34:49 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly Object. Sherfield is a stand alone village and should stay that way no housing is needed or wanted by anyone. Prefix:: Miss Your name: lynsey McDonald Your emai Address: Rose Cottage Goddards Lane

1 Steve Barker

From: Karen Payn Sent: 05 January To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:50:02 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I completely object to the housing development. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Karen Payne Your emai Address: 26 Bow Grove Sherfield-on-Loddon Postcode: RG270DY

1 Steve Barker

From: A villager Sent: 05 January 2016 08:07 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:07:13 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon/sherfield-on-loddon- comment

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I live in Sherfield on Loddon and I whole heartedly object to this proposal . It is in our Strategic Gap. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: A villager Your ema

1 Steve Barker

From: Greg Millis Sent: 05 January 2016 08:19 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:19:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Please register my objection to this scheme - in the event this, or a similar, scheme is worked up further into a Planning Application, I will be formally objecting at that point. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: As noted above. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Greg Millis Your email Address: 55 Bow Drive Sherfield on Loddon Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Phillip Sent: 05 January 2016 08:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:31:06 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I wish to formally confirm my complete opposition to this proposed development. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Phillip Your emai

1 Steve Barker

From: Townsend Sent: 05 January 2016 08:39 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:39:06 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am opposed to this developmnt Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Please withdraw Prefix:: Mr Your name: Townsend Your ema Address: 19 Northfield Rd Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: Terence Horto Sent: 05 January 2016 08:41 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:40:39 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Strong objections to the proposal, primarily concerned with traffic density, off-street parking for > 180 vehicles within the development, utility overloads (sewage, telephony, etc.), water run-off into a flood plain amongst other infrastructure challenges. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: None, except rejection of the proposal totally as there are significant houses being built in Bramley and Redlands which should provide sufficient houses within the locale. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Yes. Very few households in Sherfield were in receipt of your proposal document (250 copies max). Please ensure that ALL households in Sherfield receive documentation in future. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Terence Horton Your email Address: 11 Poplar Close Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DX

1 Steve Barker

From: Ann Elvin Sent: 05 January 2016 08:46 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:45:57 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Impractical on so many levels. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Build it somewhere else. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I will be sending my thoughts to Basingstoke and Deane Council. Prefix:: Ms Your name: Ann Elvin Your email Address: 37 Pound Meadow Sherfield on Loddon

Postcode: RG27 0EP

1 Steve Barker

From: Peter Rosie Sent: 05 January 2016 09:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:59:58 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Totally unsuitable location which will create extensive issues for the village. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: If a requirement exists, other than profit, build elsewhere. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Further comment will be made direct to BCC. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Peter Rosie Your emai Address: 37 Pound Meadow Sherfield on Loddon

Postcode: RG27 0EP

1 Steve Barker

From: Julie Sent: 05 January 2016 10:35 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:35:05 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly object Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Julie Your email: Beardall Address: 2 Bullsdown Close, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Graeme Sent: 05 January 2016 10:36 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:36:25 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: No Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: No Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Strongly object Prefix:: Mr Your name: Graeme Your email: Beardall Address: 2 Bullsdown Close, Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Matthew Fry Sent: 05 January 2016 13:00 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:59:57 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Although I live adjacent to the proposed development site, I was not consulted on this matter by Gladman. Instead, I found details of this consultation by going to the website direct. I object to the proposed development and will provide my full reasons if and when a formal planning application is made. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Matthew Fry Your em

1 Steve Barker

From: Bruce Anse Sent: 05 January 2016 14:41 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:40:53 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Yes, the development is not required. Within the emerging local plan there is no housing requirement for homes in Sherfield. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Developments such as this should be built in areas offering sustainable infrastructure, Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Your development offers increased traffic issues and therefore reduced safety to the village residents, you will be destroying protected wildlife, you are proposing building within a know flood zone. Your development is proposed within an area defined in the local plan as Strategic gap. There are clear alternatives to this development across the Basingstoke and Deane Borough. The NPPF aims to ensure that flood risk is taken into account at all stages in the planning process to avoid inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding, and to direct development away from areas at highest risk. Where new development is necessary in such areas, the policy aims to make it safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere and where possible, reducing flood risk overall. A sequential risk-based approach to determining the suitability of land for development in flood risk areas is central to the policy statement, and should be applied at all levels of the planning process. In areas at risk of river flooding, preference should be given to locating new development in Flood Zone 1. If there is no reasonably available site in Flood Zone 1, the flood vulnerability of the proposed development can be taken into account in locating development in Flood Zone 2, and then Flood Zone 3. Within each flood zone, new development should be directed to sites at the lowest probability of flooding from all sources. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Bruce Ansell Your email Address: 7 Bramley Green Road Bramley, Hampshire Postcode: RG26 5UE

1 Steve Barker

From: Bramlwy parush council Sent: 05 January 2016 16:31 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:30:57 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Bramley parish council object to this proposal in neighbouring sherfield on loddon. The additional stress on local infrastructure cannot be mitigated. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Bramlwy parush council Your email: [email protected]

1 Steve Barker

From: Susannah We Sent: 05 January 2016 17:10 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:10:03 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I object to the plans for the building of this development. This is a ridiculous area to build on. Sherfield On Loddon is a small village, it has no school, no doctors surgery and no infastructure big enough to support this development. The primary school in the neighbouring village has already expanded to it's capacity and it is always full. The children from this village attend numerous schools already due to the fact that there is already no space. The doctors surgery in Bramley is also full and their plans to expand only take in the current population increase, not any further development. Bow Drive, Bow Grove and Goddard's Corner are small roads which are already difficult to drive through due to the number of cars needing to park to access their own homes. It is not feesable to expect this to be a sensible access route to this proposed development. I live on Bow Drive and already often struggle to park anywhere near my home. The River Loddon runs along the side of this proposed development. This is prone to flooding already and building on this farmland will only increase the frequency and severity of the floods. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Do not build here! Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I object to the plans for the building of this development. This is a ridiculous area to build on. Sherfield On Loddon is a small village, it has no school, no doctors surgery and no infastructure big enough to support this development. The primary school in the neighbouring village has already expanded to it's capacity and it is always full. The children from this village attend numerous schools already due to the fact that there is already no space. The doctors surgery in Bramley is also full and their plans to expand only take in the current population increase, not any further development. Bow Drive, Bow Grove and Goddard's Corner are small roads which are already difficult to drive through due to the number of cars needing to park to access their own homes. It is not feesable to expect this to be a sensible access route to this proposed development. I live on Bow Drive and already often struggle to park anywhere near my home. The River Loddon runs along the side of this proposed development. This is prone to flooding already and building on this farmland will only increase the frequency and severity of the floods. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Susannah West Your em Address: 29 Bow Drive Sherfield On Loddon Hook Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Karen Pewte Sent: 05 January 2016 19:10 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:09:44 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: As a resident of Sherfield on Loddon I strongly object to building on the land behind Bow Drive. Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Karen Pewter Your ema Address: 4 Bow Drive Postcode: rg270eq

1 Steve Barker

From: SImo Sent: 05 January 2016 19:22 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:21:59 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: The proposal is inappropriate for the village. It is too large and the local infrastructure, for example the roads, would not support a development of this size. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I am not in favour of the development. Prefix:: Mr Your name: SImon Your email: Hennessey Address: Old School House Postcode: RG27 0EZ

1 Steve Barker

From: Jonathan Pe Sent: 05 January 2016 20:17 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:16:35 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Gladman can help to maintain the shape of Sherfield on Loddon by not continuing with this possible development Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: The only positive suggestion is not to pursue this development Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: I strongly object to this development. It will change Sherfield on Loddon forever for those that live here and future generations. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Jonathan Peer Your em Address: 12 Bow Grove Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: RG27 0DT

1 Steve Barker

From: Eleanor Bur Sent: 05 January 2016 22:05 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:05:23 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I am completely opposed to this proposed development Prefix:: Mrs Your name: Eleanor Burt Your ema Address: 22 Northfield Road, Sherfield-on-Loddon, Hook, Hampshire Postcode: RG27 0DR

1 Steve Barker

From: James Pobge Sent: 06 January 20 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:37:56 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: I strongly object to the developement Prefix:: Mr Your name: James Pobgee Your Postcode: RG270EJ

1 Steve Barker

From: Marc Birch Sent: 06 January 2016 20:17 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:16:51 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Consider a location that has better access and with less restricted highways. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Consider a location that has better access and with less restricted highways. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Consider a location that has better access and with less restricted highways. Prefix:: Mr Your name: Marc Birch Your emai Address: 2 Bow Gardens Sherfield on Loddon Postcode: Rg27 0eh

1 Steve Barker

From: B. Poffle Sent: 08 January 2016 14:26 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:26:20 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Yes. Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Yes. Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: Yes. Prefix:: Mr Your name: B. Poffley Your em

1 Steve Barker

From: David Howell Sent: 10 January 2016 21:16 To: YourViews; [email protected] Subject: Comments - Sherfield-on-Loddon

Sherfield-on-Loddon

Form Name: sherfield-on-loddon Date of Submission: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:15:35 +0000 Your server: www.your-views.co.uk URL of page containing form: http://www.your-views.co.uk/Sherfield-on-loddon-comment/

Looking at the plans, do you have any comments that will help us shape our masterplan?: Please see comments below Would you like to suggest any changes to improve the proposals?: Please see comments below Are there any other comments you would like us to consider?: We would not support this development. The addition of the significant number of houses, will clearly increase traffic flow through the small village, will put additional pressure onto schools which have limited capacity and finally add additional pressures on GP practices, which under the current NHS reforms means that they are unable to accommodate increases in patients (this is contrary to what the practice may have said as they are obligated to accept new patients). There is also the issue that this narrows the gap between both Sherfield on Loddon and Bramley and cuts across greenfield land. Prefix:: Mr Your name: David Howell Your email: Address: Sherfield On Loddon

1