DOCSLIB.ORG

Directing Shakespeare with Michael Chekhov's Technique

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Directing Shakespeare with Michael Chekhov's Technique This is a repository copy of The Importance of How : Directing Shakespeare with Michael Chekhov's Technique. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/75318/ Version: Published Version Article: Cornford, Tom orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-7382 (2012) The Importance of How : Directing Shakespeare with Michael Chekhov's Technique. Shakespeare Bulletin. pp. 485-504. ISSN 1931-1427 https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2012.0065 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Access Provided by University of York at 01/15/13 3:31PM GMT The Importance of How: Directing Shakespeare with Michael Chekhov’s Technique TOM CORNFORD University of York ‘‘What’ is important, but ‘how’ is much more important.’ Michael Chekhov (cited in Hurst du Prey 1977, 191) Michael Chekhov was an actor, director, teacher and philosopher of the theatre. He trained with Stanislavsky before developing his own studio in Moscow and rising to become Artistic Director of the Second Moscow Art Theatre. Political disagreements forced him to leave Russia in 1928. After a period of moving around Europe and America, he cre- ated the Chekhov Theatre Studio, first at Dartington Hall, south Devon (1936–1938) and then in Ridgefield, Connecticut (1939–1942). When war forced the Studio to close, Chekhov went to Hollywood, where he taught and acted until his death in 1955. His was a life devoted to the practice and evolution of an artistic technique for the theatre. I first encountered Chekhov’s technique in 2002 in a workshop at Shakespeare’s Globe led by the actor Michael Gould, who had been play- ing Edmund in the Globe’s 2001 production of King Lear. While playing Edmund, Michael had been struck by a distinction made by Chekhov in his book To The Actor: I don’t think it is erroneous to say that two different conceptions exist among actors concerning the stage [ . ] To some of them, it is nothing but an empty space which from time to time is filled with actors, stage- hands, settings and properties; to them, all that appears on the stage is only the visible and the audible. To the others, the small space of the stage Shakespeare Bulletin 30.4: 485–504 © 2012 The Johns Hopkins University Press. 486 TOM CORNFORD is an entire world permeated with an atmosphere so strong, so magnetic that they can hardly bear to part with it. (Chekhov 2002, 47) Chekhov rejected the materialism of the former group and advocated an approach to performance that embraced the intangible: We lay great stress in our method upon the so-called intangible means of expression [ . ] for instance, the atmosphere [ . which is] absolutely intangible but strong, often much stronger than the lines the author gives us. (Chekhov and Powers, Disc 4) Michael Gould used his workshop to address atmosphere, beginning by reading aloud the following extract: The actors who possess [ . ] a love and understanding for atmosphere in a performance know [ . ] what a strong bond it creates between them and the spectator. Being enveloped by it too, the spectator himself begins to “act” along with the actors [ . ] If the actors, director, author, set de- signer [ . ] have truly created the atmosphere for the performance, the spectator will not be able to remain aloof but will respond with inspiring waves of love and confidence. (Chekhov 2002, 48) We laughed: obviously it couldn’t be so easy, but as we worked on the at- mosphere at the beginning of Hamlet, I quickly recognized the feeling of a performance going well, of jointly achieving a creative state. A hitherto elusive condition was suddenly accessible through simple, practical means. This was, for Chekhov, the only purpose of technique: ‘to invoke our inspiration and get into a creative state [ . ] by our own will’ (Chekhov and Powers, Disc 4). The value of such a technique became increasingly apparent as I started to direct and to teach acting, and I began to use and teach it gradually, dropping other approaches or re-framing them in dialogue with the principles articulated by Chekhov. My earlier training had fallen mainly into two areas: verbal and psy- chological. The verbal approach is based on the assumption that the text contains codified authorial instructions so that, for instance: “Shakespeare tells an actor quite clearly when to go fast, when to go slow, when to pause, when to come in on cue” (Hall 41). Its determinism is authorized by particular ways of reading and speaking which are valorized as some- how authentic (to the nature of dramatic verse, to the practices of the early modern playhouse, or to Shakespeare himself ). Practitioners of this approach vary from Peter Hall’s prescriptive insistence upon “the sanctity of the line” (Hall 50) to Cicely Berry’s more open, inclusive preference for THE IMPORTANCE OF HOW 487 “a real physical involvement with the language” (Berry 14). All, however, share an emphasis on text both as the principal guide to rehearsal and the primary means of communication in performance. The prioritizing of speech has a tendency to generate talking-head performances in which non-verbal communication is minimal or deployed mainly to illuminate elusive meanings. Recent historiographical and textual scholarship on actors’ parts has also given us historical reasons to suspect that this apparent fidelity to Shakespeare’s text may be no such thing and may indeed rob us of a layered and contested verbal space constructed by multiple texts containing cues that are often repeated to create complex interactions, rather than the simple linearity of a single script.1 What is more, the early modern theatre generated a diverse range of other kinds of performance-texts: extemporized speech, song, dance, fencing and other physical performances for which a primarily verbal ap- proach offers the director no vocabulary. Such an approach also inevitably prioritizes those characters (invariably male and usually upper-class) who speak most and are therefore made to seem more significant–even more alive–than other roles. To me this seems both politically insupportable and theatrically undesirable, as does the verbal approach’s tendency to- wards authoritarianism: if the text is given unequivocal authority, then the director (in teaching actors both to read and speak it) is the power behind its throne. I therefore knew that I had to find a language for rehearsal that would enable me to work with each actor’s body-mind, and would offer them freedom within the context of an interdependent ensemble whose inter- pretative decisions could be jointly evolved. The predominant model for such an approach is broadly Stanislavskian. It scores action as a series of units guided by characters’ objectives and is predicated upon an interpre- tation of their inner life. This psychological approach is, however, frequently based upon a misunderstanding of Stanislavsky’s system that “supposes that all onstage action is motivated exclusively by psychological intention” (Bogart and Landau 16) and scholars have frequently observed the pitfalls of graft- ing a predominantly Freudian conception of the human subject onto an early modern play-text. Rather than presenting a plausible psychological through-line, Shakespeare’s plays often unfold through a series of dis- continuities, with characters playing different roles in different scenes. In order to portray that, actors must be capable of treating characters as a series of images to be embodied, rather than a single psychological nar- rative. The psychological approach is poorly equipped to do this, since it 488 TOM CORNFORD tends to ask the actor to identify with the character rather than to stand outside of it and acknowledge its otherness. Chekhov’s technique, however, which depends continually upon a dia- logue between what he called “imagination and incorporation” (Chekhov 2002, 21–34), is ideally equipped to enhance productive discontinuities of character: The actor imagines with his body [ . ]. The more developed and stronger the image, the more it stimulates the actor to physically incorporate it with his body and voice. On this natural ability of the actor we base our principle of Incorporation [ . ]. The first step [the actor] must take is to imagine, as it were another body for himself [ . ] But he must imagine this within his real, visible body, occupying the same space. (Chekhov and Gordon 95–100) Rather than grounding his characterization in the day-to-day experience of continuous selfhood (that authorizes a psychological interpretation of his role), Chekhov’s approach locates the truth of the actor’s performance in a series of images. That process liberates the actor from contemporary pseudo-naturalism because his performance does not need to cohere into a single narrative, and can thus explore genres other than the realistic and cultural contexts other than the lived present. I am often struck, for instance, by the contrast between the fastidious details observed by designers and makers of clothing for Original Prac- tices productions and the relative lack of attention paid to the interaction between the clothes they make and the bodies of the actors for which they are made.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Michael Chekhov Technique: in the Classroom and on Stage
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2010 The Michael Chekhov Technique: In The Classroom and On Stage Josh Chenard Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/71 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction We are trying to find the technique for those gifted actors who want to consciously develop their talents, who want to master their abilities and not flounder aimlessly, relying upon vague inspiration…(a technique which) will teach you to economize on time in preparing your part, but without succumbing to haste and deadening cliches. -Michael Chekhov David Mamet, in his book True and False, argues against the need for acting technique, especially those created by or derived from Constantin Stanislavski. “The organic demands made on the actors,” he states, “are much more compelling…than anything prescribed or forseen by this or any other ‘method’ of acting. (Mamet 6)” Stella Adler, arguably one of the most important acting teachers of the 20th Century, agreeing with Mamet, stating “The classroom is not ideal…I learned acting by acting.(Adler 11)” These sentiments are echoed and argued in academia as well as in the professional theater world begging the questions: do actors require a technique? Is it necessary? Is it important? My answer to these questions is an immediate and unabashed YES.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PATH of the ACTOR 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 13111 Michael Chekhov, Nephew of Anton Chekhov, Was Arguably One of the Greatest 4 Actors of the Twentieth Century
    1111 2 3 4 51 THE PATH OF THE ACTOR 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 13111 Michael Chekhov, nephew of Anton Chekhov, was arguably one of the greatest 4 actors of the twentieth century. From his time as Stanislavsky’s pupil, followed 5 by his artistic leadership in the Second Moscow Art Academic Theatre, his 6 enforced emigration from the Soviet Union and long pilgrimage around 7 Europe, to his work in Hollywood, his life has made a huge impact on the 8 acting profession. Chekhov’s remarkable actor-training techniques inspired many Hollywood 9 legends – including Anthony Hopkins and Jack Nicholson – and his tech- 20111 niques remain one of the theatre’s best kept secrets. 1 This first English translation of Chekhov’s autobiographies combines The 2 Path of the Actor, from 1928, and extensive extracts from his later Life and 3 Encounters. Full of humorous and insightful observations involving promi- 4 nent characters from Moscow and the European theatre of the early twentieth 5111 century, Chekhov takes us through events in his acting career and personal 6 life, from his childhood in St Petersburg until his emigration from Latvia and 7 Lithuania in the early 1930s. 8 Chekhov’s witty, penetrating (and at times immensely touching) accounts 9 have been edited by Andrei Kirillov, whose extensive and authoritative notes 30111 accompany the autobiographies. Co-editor, Anglo-Russian trained actor, Bella 1 Merlin, also provides a useful hands-on overview of how the contemporary practitioner might use and develop Chekhov’s ideas. 2 The Path of the Actor is an extraordinary document that allows us unprece- 3 dented access into the life, times, mind and soul of a remarkable man and a 4 brilliant artist.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Davis Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts
    Oral History Collection on the Performing Arts in America Southern Methodist University The Southern Methodist University Oral History Program was begun in 1972 and is part of the University’s DeGolyer Institute for American Studies. The goal is to gather primary source material for future writers and cultural historians on all branches of the performing arts- opera, ballet, the concert stage, theatre, films, radio, television, burlesque, vaudeville, popular music, jazz, the circus, and miscellaneous amateur and local productions. The Collection is particularly strong, however, in the areas of motion pictures and popular music and includes interviews with celebrated performers as well as a wide variety of behind-the-scenes personnel, several of whom are now deceased. Most interviews are biographical in nature although some are focused exclusively on a single topic of historical importance. The Program aims at balancing national developments with examples from local history. Interviews with members of the Dallas Little Theatre, therefore, serve to illustrate a nation-wide movement, while film exhibition across the country is exemplified by the Interstate Theater Circuit of Texas. The interviews have all been conducted by trained historians, who attempt to view artistic achievements against a broad social and cultural backdrop. Many of the persons interviewed, because of educational limitations or various extenuating circumstances, would never write down their experiences, and therefore valuable information on our nation’s cultural heritage would be lost if it were not for the S.M.U. Oral History Program. Interviewees are selected on the strength of (1) their contribution to the performing arts in America, (2) their unique position in a given art form, and (3) availability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion to Michael Chekhov. Edited by Marie- Christine Autant Mathieu and Yana Meerzon
    BOOK REVIEWS The Routledge Companion to Michael Chekhov. Edited by Marie- Christine Autant Mathieu and Yana Meerzon. New York: Routledge, 2015. 434 pp. Reviewed by Conrad Alexandrowicz As I write this, I’m in the middle of rehearsals for Giraudoux’s The Madwoman of Chaillot at the University of Victoria’s Department of Theatre, in which I’m employing various key tools developed by Michael Chekhov over the course of his career as an actor, director, and visionary pedagogue. They include the Imaginary Body, Archetypal and Psychological Gestures, Atmospheres, and Qualities of Movement. It has been fascinating to read this wide-ranging and very thorough collection of essays by a host of renowned Chekhov scholars and practitioners in Europe, the UK, and the US while engaged in the process of introducing a cast of twenty young actors to what is for them an entirely new set of ideas and practices about acting and the theatre. My own exposure to Chekhov’s methods occurred in the summer of 2014 when I participated in the National Michael Chekhov Association’s (NMCA) annual Summer Training Intensive, held at the University of Southern Maine. Instructors and actors Lisa Dalton and Wil Kilroy, passionate, devoted and articulate adherents of Chekhov’s work, were mentored by the late Mala Powers, whose name appears frequently in this book; while working as an actor in Hollywood, she was taught and coached by the Russian master. I was struck by many things about the work: that it proceeds from the assumption that an actor is an artist, not merely a puppet; by its balance of methods that reveal meaning in both text and the body; and by its use of specific, sensible, and accessible tools in the creation of characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Chekhov and His Approach to Acting in Contemporary Performance Training Richard Solomon
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 5-2002 Michael Chekhov and His Approach to Acting in Contemporary Performance Training Richard Solomon Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Solomon, Richard, "Michael Chekhov and His Approach to Acting in Contemporary Performance Training" (2002). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 615. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/615 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. MICHAEL CHEKHOV AND HIS APPROACH TO ACTING IN CONTEMPORARY PERFORMANCE TRAINING by Richard Solomon B.A. University of Southern Maine, 1983 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in Theatre) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2002 Advisory Committee: Tom Mikotowicz, Associate Professor of Theatre, Advisor Jane Snider, Associate Professor of Theatre Sandra Hardy, Associate Professor of Theatre MICaAEL CHEKHOV AND HIS APPROACH TO ACTING IN CONTEMPORARY PERFORMANCE TRAINING By Richard Solomon Thesis ~dhsor:Dr. Tom Mikotowicz An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in Theatre) May, 2002 Michael Chekhov was an actor, diuector, and teacher who was determined to develop a clear and accessible acting approach. During his lifetime, his ideas were often viewed as too radical and mystical. Over the past decade however, the Chekhov method of actor training has enjoyed an expansion of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • An Actor's Process
    AN ACTOR’S PROCESS A thesis submitted to the College of the Arts of Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts by Robert Russell May 2009 Thesis written by Robert Russell B.A., Bowling Green State University, 2005 M.F.A., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by ____________________________________, Advisor Charles Richie ____________________________________, Director, School of Theatre & Dance Cynthia Stillings ____________________________________, Interim Dean, College of the Arts John R. Crawford ii CONTENTS CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………………..iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………………………………….iv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………..1 II. SYKES……………………………………………………………………3 III. CINNESIAS……………………………………………………………..12 IV. VERSHININ……………………………………………………………..23 V. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………..34 NOTES………..………………………………………………………………………….36 APPENDIXES A. Sykes Log…………………………………………………………………….38 B. Cinnesias Log………………………………………………………………...47 C. Vershinin Score………………………………………………………………56 WORKS CITED…………………………………………………………………………74 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis is dedicated to first, to my wife, Sarah, and my family. To the Kent State University School of Theatre & Dance’s Acting Faculty; Terri Kent, Mark Monday, Chuck Richie, Jonathan Swoboda, and Eric van Baars. And to my undergraduate theatre studies mentor, Jonathan Chambers, who inspired me to pursue acting as a profession. iv 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In the Spring of 2005 I graduated from Bowling Green State University, where I earned two Bachelor of Arts degrees, one in Theatre and the other in Telecommunications. My undergraduate theatre studies provided me with an eclectic foundation for my acting. I studied and implemented the acting theories of Constantin Stanislavski, Lee Strasburg, Anne Bogart, Jacques Lecoq, Sanford Meisner, and many others. This training gave a base for my acting but it did not supply me with an effective way to approach a role or the ability to communicate my process.
    [Show full text]
  • Embodied Acting: Cognitive Foundations of Performance
    EMBODIED ACTING: COGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS OF PERFORMANCE by Richard J. Kemp B. A. Hon.s, in English Literature, New College, Oxford University, 1980 M. A. in English Literature, New College, Oxford University, 1990 M. F. A. in Performance Pedagogy, University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Theatre Arts University of Pittsburgh 2010 i UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Richard J. Kemp It was defended on June 16th, 2010 and approved by Attilio Favorini, PhD, Department of Theater Arts Kathleen George, PhD, Department of Theater Arts John Lutterbie, PhD, Department of Theater Arts, Stony Brook University Dissertation Advisor: Bruce McConachie, PhD, Department of Theater Arts ii Copyright © by Richard J. Kemp 2010 iii EMBODIED ACTING: COGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS OF PERFORMANCE Richard J. Kemp, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2010 This dissertation applies current thinking in cognitive science to elements of the actor’s process of preparing and performing a role. Findings in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and linguistics radically challenge the dualistic concepts that have dominated acting theory since the early twentieth century, and suggest more holistic models of the actor’s cognitive and expressive activities. Chapter 1 suggests how a vocabulary for nonverbal communication (nvc) drawn from social psychology can be used to analyze and describe actors’ communicative behavior. Chapter 2 examines the relationship of thought, language and gesture by considering Lakoff and Johnson’s (L & J) analysis of how conceptual thought is metaphorically shaped by the body’s experiences in the physical world.
    [Show full text]
  • Chekhov the Director
    Michael Chekhov: Directing an Actors’ Theatre Tom Cornford, The Royal Central School of Speech and Drama A Director Displaced and Overlooked Michael Chekhov is not usually considered to be one of the Russian theatre’s great directors, and he is commonly omitted from lists that include his contemporaries Kurbas, Meyerhold, Tairov and Vakhtangov.1 There are three principal reasons for this. First, Chekhov was known during his life mostly as an actor, rather than a director. Second, he left Russia in 1928 as a result of political differences with the Soviet regime, and, thereafter, almost all of his directing was conducted in a foreign language, limiting the range of plays he felt able to undertake. Third, Chekhov did not create a string of productions that transformed the understanding of theatre and its possibilities during his lifetime. Indeed, in contrast to his widely celebrated performances, much of Chekhov’s work as a director did not even achieve critical acclaim. My argument here, however, is that although these reasons not to consider Chekhov a ‘great director’ may seem logical and compelling, they also represent a limited and limiting conception of the practice of directing. There has been an understandable tendency in writing about directors to fetishize individual productions of which there are good historical records, and thus to depict directors as auteur-like creators of artistic products that are easily delineated, and easily commodified. Chekhov did create some such productions, which have already received scholarly attention, but they were not the primary focus of his directorial endeavours.2 Instead, he was much more deeply engaged with the development of ensemble companies, and with the elaboration of the creative processes by which their work would be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Chekhov Brasil
    “Transformation - that is what the actor’s nature, consciously “Transfoor sub-cornsciously,m longs for.a [...] An tactor io cannot give his audience new revelations by unvaryingly displaying only himself on the stage. How would you evaluate a painter who is unable to create anything but self-portraits?” Michael Chekhov INTRODUCING THE PROGRAM UUTRANSFORMATION/traveller o UUTRANSFORMATION The two modules of the workshop TRANSFORMATION are given regularly in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo: an introduction to the Michael Chekhov technique, and a follow-up workshop for participants familiar with the basic principles and who wish to go deeper into an aspect or tool of the technique. All workshops seek to broaden each participant’s artistic horizons, not only through learning the technique itself, but by encouraging everyone to take a critical look at the times in which we live. We question our over-reliance on all things practical, material and tangible, something reflected in the arts in general, but certainly in our specific creative field, the theatre. The activities of Michael Chekhov Brasil are a firm gesture against this tendency and the workshops reflect this movement, forging alternative paths which broaden and strengthen this resistance. As artists, we must all row against the tide of the Zeitgeist and consciously value the spirit and creative individuality – ours and that of each other. o UUTRANSFORMATION/traveller PROGRAMME In 2015 Michael Chekhov Brasil launched the TRANSFORMATION/traveller programme, which enables the introduction and training of the Michael Chekhov technique through partnerships with dramatic arts teaching institutions, at state or private colleges, drama schools and cultural centres, festivals etc.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2008 Bren Wion All Rights Reserved
    © 2008 BREN WION ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TRANSFORMING ACTOR TRAINING: MICHAEL CHEKHOV’S PSYCHO-PHYSICAL TECHNIQUE A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Bren Wion May, 2008 TRANSFORMING ACTOR TRAINING: MICHAEL CHEKHOV’S PSYCHO-PHYSICAL TECHNIQUE Bren Wion Thesis Approved: Accepted: _________________________ _________________________ Advisor Dean of the College James Slowiak James Lynn _________________________ __________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Durand Pope George R. Newkome __________________________ __________________________ School Director Date Neil Sapienza ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my husband and family, who have patiently and supportively allowed me to direct productions and to complete my master’s work. It also is in memory of Dr. Paul Daum, who was the professor with whom I had the most in common and from whom I gained the encouragement to develop my weakness into strength. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The leaders of the Chekhov Workshop, held in Maine, made clear the work of Michael Chekhov. In the process, they demonstrated how to understand myself and the world around me at a more conscious level. Mala Powers, Lisa Dalton, and Will Kilroy, enthusiastically impart Chekhov’s work to others. They provide useful instruction and guidance so their students have the ability to talk about Michael Chekhov and to provide visual information about his technique. Sadly, Mala Powers died in June,
    [Show full text]
  • Acting Methods Through Video for the Novice and Veteran Actor
    Columbus State University CSU ePress Theses and Dissertations Student Publications 5-2020 Staying in the Moment: Acting Methods Through Video for the Novice and Veteran Actor Cortland D. Ellis Follow this and additional works at: https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations Part of the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ellis, Cortland D., "Staying in the Moment: Acting Methods Through Video for the Novice and Veteran Actor" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 384. https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/384 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at CSU ePress. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSU ePress. COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY STAYING IN THE MOMENT: ACTING METHODS THROUGH VIDEO FOR THE NOVICE AND VETERAN ACTOR A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE HONORS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR HONORS IN THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF THEATRE COLLEGE OF THE ARTS BY CORTLAND D. ELLIS Copyright © 2020 Cortland D. Ellis All Rights Reserved. STAYING IN THE MOMENT: ACTING METHODS THROUGH VIDEO FOR THE NOVICE AND VETERAN ACTOR By Cortland D. Ellis A Thesis Submitted to the HONORS COLLEGE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in the Degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS COMMUNICATION & THEATRE COLLEGE OF THE ARTS Approved By Dr. Bruce Getz, Committee Co-Chair Professor Brenda May Ito, Committee Co-Chair Associate Professor David Turner, Committee Member Dr. Susan Tomkiewicz, Committee Member & Associate Dean Dr. Cindy Ticknor, Dean ABSTRACT High school is a great place to start acting and learn about theatre, but it can also be a place where actors develop substandard practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Chekhov, Spirituality and Soviet Theatre
    MICHAEL CHEKHOV, SPIRITUALITY AND SOVIET THEATRE PhD Liisa Byckling Professor Adjunct, Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki, Finland Abstract Te present article discusses the work of Michael Chekhov, director of the Second Moscow Art Teatre from 1922 to 1928. Afer the October revolution Chekhov sought to withstand the threat from those ideological tendencies which led away from the ideals and spiritual values of his teacher Konstantin Stanislavsky. Te reasons for Chekhov’s emigration were connected both with his opposition to Soviet cultural policy and the repression of religious groups in Russia. Chekhov was the most famous follower in the Russian theatre of the anthroposophist, Rudolf Steiner. In his production of “Hamlet” Chekhov also followed the spiritual ideas of the Russian symbolists while applying new methods of acting. Keywords: Russian theatre, art of acting, spiritual philosophy, communism. In a recent assessment of the October revolution James Ryan wrote of Lenin: “His goal was not power for its own sake, but communism: a vision of a perfected society, whereby people would live in complete social harmony. Communism, he believed, would bring with it the comprehensive development and realisation of each individual [..] For communism to exist, humanity would need to be improved and transformed. Te core of the October revolution, then, was a vision of cultural revolution, that is, the creation of a new type of person, the so-called “new Soviet person”. Te October revolution represented the most ambitious and sustained attempt at human transformation and liberation in modern European history. In failing to realise its ambitions, however, the Soviet regime became the most violent state in European history” [Ryan 2018: 46].
    [Show full text]