DOCSLIB.ORG

Fiona Campbell Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE GREAT DIVIDE: ABLEISM AND TECHNOLOGIES OF DISABILITY PRODUCTION by Fiona Anne Kumari Campbell B.L.S. (Hons) Latrobe; J.P. (Qual) Qld. Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Submitted in full requirement for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). 2003 This thesis is dedicated to: Julia Pastrana, posthumously. Julia was born in 1832 and was a short statured woman. Due to her differently appearing body Julia worked in circus and freak shows until her death in 1860, aged 28 years. Julia’s ‘act’ was billed as the ‘Ugliest woman in the world’. Her name became synonymous with monstrosity. Death did not release Julia from the violence inflicted upon her – a Professor Sokoloff mummified her body and Pastrana became a public spectacle for another hundred years. Julia Pastrana is remembered and acknowledged as one of our disability martyrs. This dissertation is an offering of recompense for the injustice done to her. i KEYWORDS Ableism; Cyborgs; Disability Theory; Ethics; Embodiment; Legal Disability; New Technologies; Normalcy; Ontological Formations; Personhood; Science Studies; Theology; Wrongful Life. ii ABSTRACT Subjects designated by the neologism 'disability' typically experience various forms of marginality, discrimination and inequality. The response by social scientists and professionals engaged in social policy and service delivery has been to combat the 'disability problem' by way of implementing anti-discrimination protections and various other compensatory initiatives. More recently, with the development of biological and techno-sciences such as 'new genetics', nanotechnologies and cyborgs the solution to 'disability' management has been in the form of utilizing technologies of early detection, eradication or at best, technologies of mitigation. Contemporary discourses of disablement displace and disconnect discussion away from the 'heart of the problem', namely, matters ontological. Disability - based marginality is assumed to emerge from a set of pre-existing conditions (i.e. in the case of biomedicalisation, deficiency inheres in the individual, whilst in the Social Model disablement is created by a capitalist superstructure). The Great Divide takes an alternative approach to studying 'the problem of disability' by proposing that the neologism 'disability' is in fact created by and used to generate notions and epistemologies of 'ableism'. Whilst epistemologies of disablement are well researched, there is a paucity of research related to the workings of ableism. The focal concerns of The Great Divide relate to matters of ordering, disorder and constitutional compartmentalization between the normal and pathological and the ways that discourses about wholeness, health, enhancement and perfection produce notions of impairment. A central argument of this dissertation figures the production of disability as part of the tussle over ordering, emerging from a desire to create order from an assumed disorder; resulting in a flimsy but often unconvincing attempt to shore up so-called optimal ontologies and disperse outlaw ontologies. The Great Divide examines ways ‘disability’ rubs up against, mingles with and provokes other seemingly unrelated concepts such as wellness, ableness, perfection, competency, causation, productivity and use value. The scaffolding of the dissertation directs the reader to selected sites that produce epistemologies of disability and ableism, namely the writing of 'history' and Judeo-Christian renderings of Disability. It explores the nuances of ableism (including a case study of wrongful life torts in law) and the phenomenon of internalized ableism as experienced by many disabled people. The study of liberalism and the government of government are explored in terms of enumeration, the science of 'counting cripples' and the battles over defining 'disability' in law and social policy. Additionally another axis of ableism is explored through the study of a number of perfecting technologies and the way in which these technologies mediate what it means to be 'human' (normalcy), morphs/simulates 'normalcy' and the leakiness of 'disability'. This analysis charts the invention of forearms transplantation (a la Clint Hallam), the Cochlear implant and transhumanism. The Great Divide concludes with an inversion of the ableist gaze(s) by proposing an ethic of affirmation, a desiring ontology of impairment. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS KEYWORDS .................................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................III TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ IV LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................VII LIST OF TABLES..........................................................................................................VII ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................VIII STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP .......................................................... IX ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... X DIVISION ONE: BODIES OF KNOWLEDGE ............................................1 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION............................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2 - METHODOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS..................17 2.1 Methods................................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Dissertation’s Relationship to Disability Studies Literature.................................... 27 2.3 On Matters Relating to Terminology ....................................................................... 33 2.4 Knowledge Standpoint of the Researcher and the Ethics of Research..................... 37 CHAPTER 3 - HISTORICAL AND THEOLOGICAL INCURSIONS CONCERNING ANOMALOUS BODIES ................................................................................40 3.1 Doing a History of Disability? – Problematisations................................................ 40 3.1.1 Writing ‘In’ Disability – Problematisations ................................................. 41 3.1.2 Genealogies of Disability in Western Thought ............................................ 46 3.2 Deconstruction: Judeo-Christian Renderings of ‘Disability’ .................................. 56 3.2.1 Abusive Theologies of Disability................................................................. 56 3.2.2 Reading the Holy Books in a Different Key ………………………………..59 3.2.3 Alternative and Oppositional Theologies..................................................... 69 3.2.4 Reinscribing Disability into Scripture - Moses’ Mouth - New Ways of Mentoring................................................................................................ 80 CHAPTER 4 - THE POLITICS OF ABLEISM AND HATRED..................................................90 4.1 Shifting the Gaze - Exposing Ableism...................................................................... 91 4.2 Unraveling Internalised Ableism and the Docile Disabled Body........................... 104 4.3 Case Study: Disability and Tortuous Liability – Wrongful Birth/ Life Actions ...... 115 4.3.1 The Basis of Torts...................................................................................... 116 4.3.2 Fundamentals of Wrongful Birth and Life Actions.................................... 117 4.3.3 Legal Reactions – the United States........................................................... 119 4.3.4 Legal Reactions Australia .......................................................................... 122 4.3.5 Summary of Grounds for Rejection of Wrongful Life Actions .................. 127 4.3.6 Ontological Outputs, Philosophical and Legal Implications ...................... 127 iv DIVISION TWO: PRACTISED BODIES..................................................133 CHAPTER 5 - GOVERNING ‘DISABILITY’ IN THE SPIRIT OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT .....134 5.1. The Ableist Sovereign Subject of Liberalism.......................................................... 135 5.1.2 Autonomy as Freedom – a Recapitulation of Ableist Subjectivity? ........... 137 5.1.3 ‘Governing the Remainder’: Bound by Mutual Obligation ........................ 143 5. 2 Biomedicalism Meets the Counting of Cripples.................................................... 146 5.2.1 The Biomedicalisation of Disability........................................................... 147 5.2.2 The Social Model of Disability .................................................................. 156 5.2.3 Knowing the Population: The Science of Counting Cripples ..................... 165 5.2.4 A Grand Fabrication: The Universalising and Essentialising of Disability ................................................................................................... 173 5.2.5 An Australian Disabled State, or the State of Disability in Australia ......... 176 5.3 Operationalising Disability: Social Role Valorization Theory as Discourse: Bio-medical Transgression or Recuperation? ....................................................... 182 5.3.1 History and Diversity................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sport, Disability and the Olympics

    Sport, Disability and the Olympics

    Transmission Spring 2012 Sport, Disability and the Olympics An exploration of the status and prophetic role of the Special Olympic Movement in light of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Reflection on disability sport to date has primarily But there are voluminous amounts of evidence that focussed on issues surrounding embodiment, demonstrate that modern commercialised professional competitive classification, social exclusion, sport is plagued with moral and ethical issues. More biomechanical study of prostheses, governance and often than not, these are rooted in a prideful heart, media and cinematic representations of athletes with that seeks to ‘win-at-all-costs’, resulting in cheating, disabilities. Theological analysis has been virtually verbal and physical violence, alienation in relationships, non-existent. This is not surprising, considering that doping, political boycotts, financial greed and corruption, historically the world Church (the Catholic community self-exaltation and on the horizon genetic performance have arguably led the way in inclusion and provision enhancement technologies for athletes. for the disabled) has had a poor record in regard to the Nick It is therefore interesting to consider Paul’s paradoxical inclusion of those with physical or intellectual disability Watson ministry of ‘power through weakness’ (the self-emptying in ecclesiological praxis. In recent times though, there gospel of Christ), described in 2 Corinthians, and the self- Nick Watson is a are very positive signs of change.1 Senior Lecturer in exalting cultural setting of first-century Corinth. Is not Sport, Culture and My aim in this article is to provide some provisional this in many ways a mirror-image of the self-promoting, Religion at York St thoughts on how Christians may understand disability celebrity culture of today and twenty-first century sport? John University, a sport.
  • Contours of Ableism: the Production of Disability and Abledness

    Contours of Ableism: the Production of Disability and Abledness

    Contours of Ableism Copyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to Feng Chia University - PalgraveConnect - 2011-04-01 - PalgraveConnect - licensed to Feng Chia University www.palgraveconnect.com material from Copyright 10.1057/9780230245181 - Contours of Ableism, Fiona Kumari Campbell July 23, 2009 18:51 MAC/COA Page-i 9780230_579286_01_prexiv This page intentionally left blank Copyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to Feng Chia University - PalgraveConnect - 2011-04-01 - PalgraveConnect - licensed to Feng Chia University www.palgraveconnect.com material from Copyright 10.1057/9780230245181 - Contours of Ableism, Fiona Kumari Campbell Contours of Ableism The Production of Disability and Abledness Fiona Kumari Campbell Griffith University, Australia Copyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to Feng Chia University - PalgraveConnect - 2011-04-01 - PalgraveConnect - licensed to Feng Chia University www.palgraveconnect.com material from Copyright 10.1057/9780230245181 - Contours of Ableism, Fiona Kumari Campbell July 23, 2009 18:51 MAC/COA Page-iii 9780230_579286_01_prexiv © Fiona Kumari Campbell 2009 Foreword © Dan Goodley 2009 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted her right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
  • Michel Foucault, Philosopher? a Note on Genealogy and Archaeology1 Rudi Visker

    Michel Foucault, Philosopher? a Note on Genealogy and Archaeology1 Rudi Visker

    PARRHESIA NUMBER 5 • 2008 • 9-18 MICHEL FOUCAULT, PHILOSOPHER? A NOTE ON GENEALOGY AND ARCHAEOLOGY1 Rudi Visker My title formulates a question that is mainly addressed to myself. Less elliptically formulated, it would read as follows: please explain why you, a professor in philosophy, have published over the years so many pages in which you kept referring to the work of someone who has authored a series of historical works on topics which, at first sight, have hardly any bearing on the discipline which your institution pays you to do research in. Whence this attraction to studies on madness, crime or sexuality? Wasn’t one book enough to make you realize that however enticing a reading such works may be, they bring little, if anything, for philosophy as such? I imagine my inquisitor wouldn’t rest if I were to point out to him that he seems badly informed and apparently unaware of the fact that Foucault by now has come to be accepted as an obvious part of the philosophical canon for the past century. Should I manage to convince him to take up a few of the books presenting his thought to philosophers, he would no doubt retort that what he had been reading mainly consisted of summaries of the aforementioned histories, and for the rest of exactly the kind of arguments that gave rise to his suspicion: accusations of nihilism, relativism, self-contradiction, critique without standards… And worse, if I were honest, I would have to agree that for all the fascination that it exerted on us philosophers, Foucault’s work also put us before a deep, and by now familiar embarrassment.
  • TIPS, Volume 14, No. 6, and Volume 15, No. 1, 1995

    TIPS, Volume 14, No. 6, and Volume 15, No. 1, 1995

    University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC Training Institute Publication Series (TIPS) Wolfensberger Collection 4-1995 TIPS, Volume 14, No. 6, and Volume 15, No. 1, 1995 Wolf P. Wolfensberger Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/wolf_tips Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Wolfensberger, Wolf P., "TIPS, Volume 14, No. 6, and Volume 15, No. 1, 1995" (1995). Training Institute Publication Series (TIPS). 62. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/wolf_tips/62 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Wolfensberger Collection at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Training Institute Publication Series (TIPS) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I I Editor / Publisher Wolf Wolfensberger \ ~i.1 Address: Professor Division of Special Education Training Institute for Human Service and Rehabilitation Planning, Leadership & Change Agentry 805 South Crouse Avenue 805 South Crouse Avenue Syracuse University Syracuse, New York 13244-2280 Syracuse, New York 13244-2280 U. S. A. Vol. 14, No.6 April 1995 TRAnnNG INSTITUTE Syracuse, New York Vol. 15, No. 1 June 1995 PUBLICATION SERIES 13244-2280 This double issue of TIPS will have two major themes: (a) coverage of Social Role Valorization (SRV) issues, and especially the most extensive analysis of human service names from an SRV perspective; and (b) miscellaneous news on human services that always piles up when we do a special-theme issue. Social Role Valorization (SRV) *Beginning with the January 1995 issue of SRV/VRS: The International Social Role Valorization Journal/La Revue Internationale de la Valorisation des ROles Sociaux (SRVJ/VRSJ), the TIPS editor will edit a column in that journal entitled "Social Role Valorization News and Reviews." However, we have on hand such a mountain of SRV copy that TIPS will still continue to carry occasional SRV items that are not identical to those in the new column in the SRVJ/VRSJ.
  • Carceral Biocitizenship

    Carceral Biocitizenship

    2 Carceral Biocitizenship The Rhetorics of Sovereignty in Incarceration Sarah Burgess and Stuart J. Murray Introduction On October 19, 2007, nineteen- year- old Ashley Smith died of self- inflicted strangulation while on suicide watch at the Grand Valley Institution for Women in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. As she tied a liga- ture around her neck, correctional officers, who had been instructed not to enter into her cell if she was still breathing, watched— and in com- pliance with Canadian regulations,1 videorecorded—her death. As the video footage attests, they entered her cell only when she was nonrespon- sive and could not be resuscitated. Six days later, the three correctional officers who stood by and watched Smith’s suicide were charged, along with one of their supervisors, with criminal negligence causing death, while the warden and deputy warden were fired. Criminal charges were later dropped. The case gained some attention following the June 2008 publication of a report by the Office of the Correctional Investigator of Canada titled A Preventable Death; and public outcry grew considerably when Canada’s national CBC News Network’s The Fifth Estate broadcast two special investigative reports in January and November 2010, titled “Out of Control” and “Behind the Wall,” respectively. The latter broad- cast included the video footage of Smith’s death, and the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) came under intense scrutiny for its treatment of prisoners with mental health problems. What emerged over the course of the Coroner’s Inquests (there were two, in 2011 and 2012) were the systemic yet oftentimes highly coordi- nated, seemingly intentional failures and abuses on the part of the CSC.
  • Disability As a Liminal Legal Concept

    Disability As a Liminal Legal Concept

    Welcoming Monsters: Disability as a Liminal Legal Concept Jonas-S~bastien Beaudry* "One morning, I got up to shave, as usual, and instead of a hair, there was a feather on my face." "Well, it's normal for a crow to have feathers. However what's less normal is to shave if you have feathers." "But I wasn't a crow before, I was a normal being like you..."' The philosophy of disability has burgeoned into a field of its own. Like the general field of disability studies, it hosts a multiplicity of schools, expertise and methodologies. It is unified, if at all, by a desire for the social integration of people perceived or understood to be "different", mentally or physically. This article aims to orient the reader within the field of the philosophy of disability and present some important lessons that it can teach legal actors. The task of achieving social integration for people with disabilities (PWD) and other minority groups has often been presented under the political idiom of equality. Philosophers have contributed to this endeavor, both within and outside of law schools, by problematizing the meaning and normative implications of equality. Philosophers of disability, in particular, have empowered disability activists with egalitarian arguments utilizing notions of oppression, dignity and substantive equality. However, the field of the philosophy of disability is not only divided by the question of "what is equality and how to best achieve it?" but also by the more fundamental question of "what is social integration and how to best achieve it?" While egalitarian answers to that question may hold greater purchase in our current legal culture, I will consider other promising answers that draw from beyond the confines of liberalism in this article, * Assistant Professor, Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia.
  • Fugitive Life: Race, Gender, and the Rise of the Neoliberal-Carceral State

    Fugitive Life: Race, Gender, and the Rise of the Neoliberal-Carceral State

    Fugitive Life: Race, Gender, and the Rise of the Neoliberal-Carceral State A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Stephen Dillon IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Regina Kunzel, Co-adviser Roderick Ferguson, Co-adviser May 2013 © Stephen Dillon, 2013 Acknowledgements Like so many of life’s joys, struggles, and accomplishments, this project would not have been possible without a vast community of friends, colleagues, mentors, and family. Before beginning the dissertation, I heard tales of its brutality, its crushing weight, and its endlessness. I heard stories of dropouts, madness, uncontrollable rage, and deep sadness. I heard rumors of people who lost time, love, and their curiosity. I was prepared to work 80 hours a week and to forget how to sleep. I was prepared to lose myself as so many said would happen. The support, love, and encouragement of those around me means I look back on writing this project with excitement, nostalgia, and appreciation. I am deeply humbled by the time, energy, and creativity that so many people loaned me. I hope one ounce of that collective passion shows on these pages. Without those listed here, and so many others, the stories I heard might have become more than gossip in the hallway or rumors over drinks. I will be forever indebted to Rod Ferguson’s simple yet life-altering advice: “write for one hour a day.” Adhering to this rule meant that writing became a part of me like never before.
  • Dignity and the Toileting Issue for Persons with Multiple and Severe Disabilities

    Dignity and the Toileting Issue for Persons with Multiple and Severe Disabilities

    Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 1 & 2, pp. 153-164 Breaching the Last Frontier: Dignity and the Toileting Issue for Persons with Multiple and Severe Disabilities Emma Pivato, PhD Centre for Integrated Studies Athabasca University Although much has been written about the normalization and social inclusion of persons with developmental disabilities over the past 50 years, a small subset of this population has remained largely overlooked – individuals who are quadriplegic, non-verbal and who also have additional disabilities, including cognitive impairment. The present project was designed to address one of the most glaring aspects of this neglect – personal control over personal hygiene and its connection to human dignity and sense of self-efficacy. Ten parents with adult children with severe and multiple disabilities were asked a series of questions to explore the following thesis: Are unnecessary physical barriers negatively impacting on normalization in the area of personal care, an important area of pro-social behavior? Background The concept of “normalization” was first formalized in 1959 through an Act passed in the Danish parliament, decreeing that those responsible ensure that Danish subjects with “mental retardation” live a life as much as possible like the rest of the Danish population. In Sweden this idea was picked up by Bengt Nirje, Ombudsman of the “Swedish Association for Retarded Children.” He disseminated the idea of normalization through talks at home and abroad and through personal communication with colleagues in America. Two of his papers were included in an edited work by Robert Kugel and Wolf Wolfensberger (1969) and this 154 Emma Pivato work became the catalyst for embedding the concept of normalization within the North American rehabilitation community.
  • Alstt Mo. 3-7/0 PERCEPTIONS OF

    Alstt Mo. 3-7/0 PERCEPTIONS OF

    37? AlStt Mo. 3-7/0 PERCEPTIONS OF CAREPROVIDERS CONCERNING THE NORMALIZATION/ DEVELOPMENTAL MODEL'S REPLACEMENT OF THE MEDICAL MODEL AS THE BASIS FOR PROVIDING EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO THE INSTITUTIONALIZED ADULT WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Sharon Coutryer, B.A., M.S. Denton, Texas May, 1993 37? AlStt Mo. 3-7/0 PERCEPTIONS OF CAREPROVIDERS CONCERNING THE NORMALIZATION/ DEVELOPMENTAL MODEL'S REPLACEMENT OF THE MEDICAL MODEL AS THE BASIS FOR PROVIDING EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO THE INSTITUTIONALIZED ADULT WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the University of North Texas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Sharon Coutryer, B.A., M.S. Denton, Texas May, 1993 (?WM Coutryer, Sharon M. Perceptions of Careproviders Concerning the Normalization/Developmental Model's Replacement of the Medical Model as the Basis for Providing Education and Training to the Institutionalized Adult With Developmental Disabilities. Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education), May, 1993, 216 pp., 73 tables, 5 figures, bibliography, 110 titles. Previous research suggests that careproviders' attitudes and perceptions significantly influence the type and quality of services received by institutionalized adults with developmental disabilities (IADD). This study explored attitudes careproviders hold concerning training needs of the IADD and their service model orientation. It traced the history of training people with developmental disabilities and provided a brief review of the medical, developmental, and normalization models of service delivery. The conceptual framework upon which this study was based proposed that staff perceptions and orientation concerning service delivery to the IADD can be conceptually related to five factors in a research model.
  • Passing Manual 2007

    Passing Manual 2007

    P Ratings Manual 3rd (revised) Edition A S S I N G PASSING A Tool for Analyzing Service Quality According to Wolf Wolfensberger Wolf and Social Role Valorization Criteria. Susan Thomas Ratings Manual 3rd (revised) Edition Wolf Wolfensberger and Susan Thomas © Copyright 2007 Published by: Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership and Change Agentry, Syracuse University • 800 South Wilbur Avenue, Suite 3B1 • Syracuse, New York 13204, USA Phone: 315.473.2978 • Fax: 315.473.2963 PASSING A TOOL FOR ANALYZING SERVICE QUALITY ACCORDING TO SOCIAL ROLE VALORIZATION CRITERIA Ratings Manual PASSING A Tool for Analyzing Service Quality According to Social Role Valorization Criteria Ratings Manual 3rd (revised) edition Corrected 2nd Printing, 2008 Wolf Wolfensberger & Susan Thomas Copyright 2007, by Wolf Wolfensberger Published by: Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership and Change Agentry, Syracuse University 800 South Wilbur Avenue, Suite 3B1 Syracuse, New York 13204 USA phone 315/473-2978 fax 315/473-2963 The correct reference for this work in the style of the American Psychological Association is: Wolfensberger, W., & Thomas, S. (2007). PASSING. A tool for analyzing service quality according to Social Role Valorization criteria. Ratings manual (3rd rev. ed.). Syracuse, NY: Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership & Change Agentry (Syracuse University). Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................
  • An Anti-Carceral Critique of Canada's Solitary Confinement Litigation

    An Anti-Carceral Critique of Canada's Solitary Confinement Litigation

    Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University Schulich Law Scholars Research Papers, Working Papers, Conference Papers Faculty Scholarship 2020 Disabling Solitary: An Anti-Carceral Critique of Canada's Solitary Confinement Litigation Sheila Wildeman Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/working_papers Part of the Disability Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Sheila Wildeman, "Disabling Solitary: An Anti-Carceral Critique of Canada's Solitary Confinement Litigation" in The Legacies of Institututionalisation: Disability, Law and Policy in the 'Deinstitutionalised' Community, Claire Spivakovsky, Linda Steele and Penelope Weller, eds (Oxford Hart, forthcoming 2020). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers, Working Papers, Conference Papers by an authorized administrator of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Disabling Solitary: An Anti-Carceral Critique of Canada's Solitary Confinement Litigation [Pre-publication version of chapter for The Legacies of Institutionalisation: Disability, Law and Policy in the ‘Deinstitutionalised’ Community, Claire Spivakovsky, Linda Steele and Penelope Weller, eds (Oxford: Hart, forthcoming 2020). Online version updated Apr 27, 2020.] SHEILA WILDEMAN The title of this chapter signifies at least three things. The first is the disabling effects of solitary confinement. The second is recent efforts of prison justice advocates in Canada to use law, or specifically litigation, to disable the logic of solitary confinement: to disrupt that logic through the logic of human rights.
  • Beyond Severe Disabilities: National Approaches and Networking Guide

    Beyond Severe Disabilities: National Approaches and Networking Guide

    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Publications Archives, 1963-2000 Center for Public Affairs Research 11-1985 Beyond Severe Disabilities: National Approaches and Networking Guide Floyd T. Waterman University of Nebraska at Omaha Carole Davis University of Nebraska at Omaha Lois S. Rood University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives Part of the Demography, Population, and Ecology Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Recommended Citation Waterman, Floyd T.; Davis, Carole; and Rood, Lois S., "Beyond Severe Disabilities: National Approaches and Networking Guide" (1985). Publications Archives, 1963-2000. 266. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives/266 This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Public Affairs Research at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications Archives, 1963-2000 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEYOND SEVERE DISABILITY: NATIONAL APPROACHES AND NETWORKING GUIDE by Floyd T. Waterman Carole M. Davis Lois S. Rood November 1985 Center for Applied Urban Research College of Public Affairs and Community Service The University of Nebraska at Omaha The University of Nebraska-An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Educational Institution MODELS AND STRATEGIES FOR FINDING THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Project Advisory Committee