Diplomacy and Global Security: a Historical Narrative of the Post-Cold War Era
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Diplomacy and Global Security: A Historical Narrative of the Post-Cold War Era Diplomacy and Global Security: A Historical Narrative of the Post-Cold War Era Henry B. Ogunjewo, Ph.D Department of History & Strategic Studies, University of Lagos, Nigeria Email: [email protected]@gmail.com Abstract Immediately after the Cold war, there was a general optimism of an international system that would enable the component nation-states to pursue economic growth and greater independence. Despite the various strategies by the component nation states in the international system to attain self- sufficiency in economic terms and thus reduce dependence on other nation states for their needs and survival thereby weakening bilateral relations, the contemporary realities of the international system in the face of global security challenges pose a compelling sustained cooperation and collaboration among the nation states in the international system. Global security includes military and diplomatic measures that nations and international organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) take to ensure mutual safety and security. It also includes the regional and sub-regional collaborative strategies at combating security challenges. Diplomacy and global security are among the most pressing issues facing the world today. Success or failure can have huge implications for the international community and society as a whole. This paper submits that global security will remain a compelling factor in diplomatic relations in the twenty-first century. Keywords: Global Security, Diplomacy, Cold War, Collaborative Strategies, Sustained Cooperation Introduction Global security in the contemporary international system includes military and diplomatic measures that nation-states and international organizations such as the United Nations and NATO as well as regional organizations like the European Union (EU), the African Union (AU), the Organization of American State (OAS) and so on take to ensure mutual safety and security. It also includes the collaborative efforts and regional organizations corporate efforts which provide analyses that help policymakers understand political, military and economic trends around the world; the sources of potential regional conflict; and emerging threats to the global security environment (Buzan and Hansen, 2009). Global security, refers to the amalgamation of measures taken by nation states and international organizations, such as the United Nations, European 1 Jalingo Journal of Social and Management Sciences Volume 1, Number 4 August, 2019 Union, and others, to ensure mutual survival and safety. These measures include military action and diplomatic agreements such as treaties and conventions. International and National security are invariably linked and mutually dependent. As a matter of fact, International security is national security or state security in the global arena. Diplomacy and international security are among the most pressing issues facing the world today. The success or failure of global security can have huge implications for the international community and society as a whole. That is why this paper presents an opportunity for diplomats, politicians, academics, state and non-state actors to think strategically reflect historically and plan properly. The content of international security has expanded over the years. Today it covers a variety of interconnected issues in the world that affect survival. It ranges from the traditional or conventional modes of military power, the causes and consequences of war between and among states, economic strength, to ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts, trade and economic conflicts, energy supplies, science and technology, food, as well as threats to human security and the stability of states from environmental degradation, infectious diseases, climate change and the activities of non-state actors (Buzen et al, 1998). The international system as presently constituted is very fragile and demands sustained cooperation and collaboration. This paper submits that global security will remain a compelling factor in diplomatic relations in the twenty-first century. Diplomacy Diplomacy as a concept and practice is as old as man. However, the origin of organized diplomacy may be traced to the relations among the city-states of ancient Greece. By the fifth century BC, Nicolson stated, "special missions between the Greek city-states had become so frequent that something approaching our own system of regular diplomatic intercourse had been achieved." (Nicolson, 1946) Thucydides reported about diplomatic procedure among the Greeks, as, for instance, in his account of a conference at Sparta in 432 BC in which the Spartans and their allies considered what action to take against Athens (Nicolson, 1946). The Romans contributed in a way to the advancement of the art of diplomacy by negotiation. Their representatives became skilled diplomats and trained observers. This extended the practice of diplomacy to include observation and reporting along with representation (Kishan, 2011). Modem diplomacy as an organized profession arose in Italy in the late Middle Ages. The rivalries of the Italian city-states and the methods, which their rulers used to promote their interests, are described in masterful fashion in Machiavelli's “The Prince”. Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan, established the first known permanent mission in Genoa in 1455 (Kishan, 2011). In the next century, Italian city-states established permanent embassies in London, Paris and in the Court of the Holy Roman Emperor. A British Ambassador was assigned to reside in Paris and Francis I of France "devised something like permanent diplomatic machinery" (Akadiri, 2003). After the peace of Westphalia of 1648 formalized the state system (Akadiri, 2003), permanent missions became the rule rather than the exception. Diplomacy became an established 2 Diplomacy and Global Security: A Historical Narrative of the Post-Cold War Era profession and a generally accepted method of global intercourse. As diplomacy became more formal, its rules became more standardized. The 1815 Vienna Congress contributed in this respect, placing diplomacy on a formal basis, with standardized rules of procedure and protocols, embodied. In the Regalement of March 19, 1815 and in regulations of the Congress of Aix-la- Chapelle in 1818 (Akadiri, 2003). Harold Nicolson, whose delightful little book, Diplomacy, has become a classic on the subject has called attention to three developments in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, which have greatly affected the history, the theory, and practice of diplomacy and which have impacted significantly on foreign policies. These are: (i) The "growing sense of the community of nations," (ii) The "increasing appreciation of the importance of public opinion" and (iii) The "rapid increase in communications” (Nicholson, 1969) The first two enlarged the diplomat's functions and enhanced his importance. The foregoing process stimulated the evolution of the five traditional roles of diplomacy; Representation, Negotiation, Reporting, Interpretation and Protection. These five pillars of diplomacy now extend into trade, investments, security, sports and cultural exchanges. However, by far, the most critical factor that will define international relations in the twenty-first century is global security. Therefore, while three developments have greatly affected the history, the theory, and practice of diplomacy and have impacted significantly on foreign policies in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, only one dominant factor will determine, define and shape the twenty-first century: Global Security. The post-cold war era will witness compelling sustained cooperation and collaboration among the nation states in the international system. Global Security up to the Cold War Global Security had always been a cause of concern since the advent of the modern state. The traditional security paradigm refers to a realist construct of security in which the referent object of security is the state. The prevalence of this theorem reached a peak during the Cold War. For a very long time, major world powers entrusted the security of their states to a balance of power among nation states. In this sense, global stability relied on the premise that if state security is maintained, then the security of citizens will necessarily follow (Bajpai, 2000). Traditional security relied on the anarchistic balance of power, a military build-up between the United States and the Soviet Union (the two superpowers), and on the absolute sovereignty of the nation state (Owen, 2004). States were deemed to be rational entities, national interests and policy driven by the desire for absolute power (Bajpai, 2000). Security was seen as protection from invasion; executed during proxy conflicts using technical and military capabilities. Indeed, since the previous centuries till date, one of the greatest challenges to statecraft is the task to establish an international framework that would contain international violence and 3 Jalingo Journal of Social and Management Sciences Volume 1, Number 4 August, 2019 prevent future wars with their devastating consequences (Gordon and Alexander, 1995). This is against the background that violent conflict is an intrinsic and inevitable phenomenon in human society. Hence, as interactions occur and interests coincide, conflicts are likely to occur. For as long as this is