FAU Institutional Repository
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Notice: ©2004 Springer‐Verlag. This manuscript is a version of an article with the final publication found online at http://www.springerlink.com and may be cited as: Herring, P. J. and E. A. Widder (2004) Bioluminescence of deep‐sea coronate medusae (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa), Marine Biology 146:39– 51 doi: 10.1007/s00227‐004‐1430‐7 Marine Biology (2004) 146: 39–51 DOI 10.1007/s00227-004-1430-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE P. J. Herring Æ E. A. Widder Bioluminescence of deep-sea coronate medusae (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa) Received: 6 January 2004 / Accepted: 21 June 2004 / Published online: 28 July 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract Bioluminescence is the production of visible Captured specimens of A. parva also produce secretory light by a living organism. The light commonly appears bioluminescence, corroborating prior in situ observa- as flashes from point sources (involving one or more tions of this ability. Secretory bioluminescence in cells, usually described as photocytes) or as a glandular P. periphylla takes the form of scintillating particles secretion. A visible flash usually involves synchronous released from the lappet margins. We did not observe light emission from a group of cells or, if from a single- secretory displays in specimens of any other species in celled organism such as a dinoflagellate, from a group of the laboratory, but one instance of apparent secretory organelles. The number of cells (or organelles) luminescence was recorded in situ in a specimen of responding synchronously is the main determinant of A. wyvillei. the flash intensity. Bioluminescence is a common phe- nomenon in many deep-sea animals and is widespread among the Cnidaria. In this paper, we compare and contrast in situ and laboratory recordings of the biolu- Introduction minescent responses of specimens of the deep-sea scyphozoans Atolla wyvillei, Atolla vanhoffeni, Atolla The bioluminescent responses of deep-sea animals have parva, Nausithoe rubra, Paraphyllina intermedia, Peri- become much better documented and appreciated as a phyllopsis braueri and Periphylla periphylla. Displays in result of the development of methods for their capture all seven species consist of localised flashes and propa- that minimise mechanical damage and/or physiological gated waves of light in the surface epithelium. The first -1 shock (Wild et al. 1985; Widder 2002). Delicate gelatinous few single waves propagate at rates of up to 60 cm s animals are particularly susceptible to mechanical dam- but subsequent ones in any sequence of stimuli gradually age; the responses of specimens taken in standard nets, decrease in speed. After several single wave responses, a even if equipped with a protective closing codend, rarely subsequent stimulus may elicit multiple waves that per- match the complexity of those observed in situ from sist for several seconds. Following such a frenzy, the submersibles or Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs). specimen becomes temporarily refractory to further The responses of several specimens of Atolla wyvillei taken stimuli, but if rested will recover its normal responses in midwater trawls equipped with a closing cod-end have and may produce further frenzies. The dome area, sit- been described previously. Waves of bioluminescence uated above the coronal groove, of the genera Para- travel round the aboral surface of the animal in a variety phyllina, Periphylla, and Nausithoe is covered with of patterns (Herring 1990). Inevitably these experimental luminescent point sources. Such point sources are animals had still suffered damage in contact with the net, generally absent from the dome of species of Atolla. prior to reaching the relative protection of the cod-end. Recent studies on the ecology of the gelatinous fauna Communicated by J. P. Thorpe, Port Erin of the deep sea have derived much of their information from direct in situ observations of the animals, using P. J. Herring (&) manned submersibles and remote observations from Southampton Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, ROVs (Pugh 1989; Larson et al. 1991). Capture methods European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK E-mail: [email protected] are now available from both types of platform for the Fax: +44-238-0592647 recovery of intact single specimens and their transfer to ship (or shore) laboratories. We have used these tech- E. A. Widder Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution, 4600 U.S. 1N, niques to examine the bioluminescent responses of a Fort Pierce, FL 34946, USA variety of animals (e.g. Herring et al. 1992; Widder et al. 40 1992a; Johnsen et al. 1999) and report here the results of stimulator. Bioluminescent responses to the stimulation observations of specimens of two widespread genera of were recorded with a Dage ISIT image-intensified vid- coronate scyphozoans, Atolla and Periphylla, and three eocamera or Intevac GenIISys image intensifier system much less common coronates, Nausithoe rubra, Para- and CCD videocamera. The images were analysed on a phyllina intermedia and Periphyllopsis braueri. A pre- frame-by-frame basis. The conduction rates of propa- liminary account of the responses of some specimens of gated responses were determined from the time taken for Periphylla periphylla has been given previously (Herring a luminous wave to travel at least half the circumference et al. 1997). of any particular specimen. The circumference was cal- culated from the diameter measured from lappet tip to lappet tip. Materials and methods Some specimens were stimulated in situ by being manoeuvred into a horizontal acrylic cylinder (24 cm Specimens of Atolla spp. (n=23) and Periphylla pe- diameter) mounted on the submersible and with 1.8-mm riphylla (n=21) were captured individually with the mesh nylon screen across its rear end. The submersible Johnson Sea-Link (JSL) manned submersible during was then driven gently forward so that the animal struck cruises between 1989 and 1999 in the western North the mesh. The results of the impact were recorded using Atlantic and in 1991 in the western Mediterranean a Sub Sea Systems underwater Silicon Intensified Target (Alboran Sea). Large specimens of P. periphylla (n=84) (SIT) video camera focused on the screen, and compared were obtained during two cruises of the R/V ‘‘Ha˚ kon with the responses obtained in the laboratory. Speci- Mosby’’ in Lurefjord, Norway, in 1994 and 1995. In this mens were then collected for identification by means of a fjord, individuals undertake a diel vertical migration suction sampling device connected to the proximal end from deep water that may bring them to the surface on of the acrylic cylinder. Specimens were drawn down into moonless nights (Youngbluth and Bamstedt 2001). numbered collection buckets mounted in a carousel on Individual specimens were collected in buckets from the the lower work platform of the submersible (illustrated surface during such nights (using an inflatable dinghy) in Widder et al. 1992b). and stored on deck wrapped in opaque black polythene The experimental procedures employed for studying until required for experiment. A single specimen of the effects of temperature and light are given in the Periphyllopsis braueri and two of Paraphyllina interme- relevant paragraph of the Results. dia were collected in the Bahamas in 1989, and single specimens of Nausithoe rubra and Paraphyllina inter- media were collected in the Gulf of Mexico in 1995 and Results in the Bahamas in 1996, respectively. These specimens were collected with the JSL’s detritus samplers, which Atolla spp. are 11 l clear acrylic cylinders with hydraulically acti- vated sliding lids. Medusae were transferred in their Three species of Atolla were examined, A. wyvillei, samplers from the submersible to a shipboard cold A. vanhoffeni and A. parva. Responses were recorded laboratory for temporary storage and were subsequently from 17 specimens of A. wyvillei (size range 20–174 mm placed in crystallising dishes containing cooled seawater diameter), three specimens of A. vanhoffeni (63–113 mm) (8–12°C) for transfer to the ship’s darkroom. and three of A. parva (27–50 mm). The flash patterns Mechanical stimuli, using a mounted steel needle, and propagation were fundamentally similar in all three were given by hand (a glass probe produced similar species, but showed considerable variation, both responses). Electrical stimuli (20 V, 5 ms) were delivered between specimens and in any one specimen at different through Pt electrodes connected to a Grass square-wave stages of stimulation (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Left Diagrammatic view of the aboral or exumbrellar surface of an Atolla wyvillei (not to scale) showing the main feaures noted in the text, and right an enlarged view of a typical region with the main bioluminescent areas shaded (c.g. coronal groove, t.b. temtacle base, l.t. lappet tip; modified from Herring 1990) 41 Mechanical stimulation, equivalent to contact with Bioluminescence was never observed from any of the another animal, was provided by the touch of a mounted tentacles in laboratory specimens nor did tentacle stim- needle in the region of the coronal groove, the tentacle ulation ever initiate bioluminescence elsewhere. bases or the lappet margins ( Fig. 1). Stimuli were re- peated at variable intervals of between 2 and 10 s, long enough to allow the completion of one response before Multiple responses another was initiated. A gentle first stimulus often pro- The propagated wave noted above was unpolarised, duced only a limited local flash response lasting about travelling in both clockwise and anticlockwise direc- 500 ms (Herring 1990), particularly when the lappets tions. It could continue for any distance, ranging from a were stimulated. Subsequent stimuli usually resulted in few mm to half the circumference (Fig. 3). an increase in the intensity of the local bioluminescence In the latter case the two bioluminescent waves usu- and propagation of the response as a wave of biolumi- ally disappeared at the point where the two components nescent flashes moving over the upper (exumbrellar) met, typically on the opposite side of the exumbrellar surface.