Construction Starts in Settlements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Construction Starts in Settlements Tal Menashe Hinanit 31 26 Sh3ak5ed Netanyahu's Government 2009-2012 45 Jenin Mechola Shadmot Mechola Maskiyot Tul Karem 23 Avnei Hefetz Enav 32 24 Shavei Shomron Construction East of the Planned Barrier 27 Ro'i Sal'it Kedumim Bqa'ot Har Hemed 99 units Elon More Construction West of the Planned Barrier 33 Kedumim Nablus 99 Gilad Farm Bracha Tzofim Construction West of the Built-Up Barrier 38 Bracha 81 units 96 81 Qalqiliya sneh Yaacov Shalhevet Farm Karnei Shomron Alfei Menashe 36 42 34 Yitzhar Hill 851 49 Ma'ale Shomron Alonei Shilo 42 Gvaot Olam Mechora 26 26 Regev Nofim Built-Up Barrier Route Yakir Hill 782 29 Hill 725 50 Hill 777 24 Yair Farm Oranit Sha'arei Tikva Revava 302 123 units Kfar Tapuah Planned Barrier Route 107 Etz Efraim 37 Revava 123 31 Masu'a Tapuach West 117 Gitit Elkana 36 Ariel Magen Barqan Dan 120 16 Eli 52 units Shilo Alei Zahav 20 Bruchin Ariel Eli 53 units 130 Alei Zahav 52 120 units Ahiya Yafit Pedu'el 18 130 units Shvut Rachel Tel Aviv - Jaffa 70 16 Shilo givat harel Kida 53 47 Beit Arye Beit Arye 111 Adei Ad 111 units Tomer 30 Gilgal 30 Nili 73 units Nahliel Kochav Hashahar Ofra 20 Nerya 52 units Nili Na'ale 96 units Kochav 73 Zayit 58 units Ha'shachar 54 Raanan Nerya 82 24 58 Ofra Mitzpe Kramim Yitav Haresha 96 2,622 Units East of Beit El Talmon Hashmonaim Modi'in Ilit 32 33 2,217 Units West of 52 31539 the Planned Barrier Matityahu 18 Dolev 21 Givat Assaf the Built-Up Barrier Kfar Ha'oranim Mevo'ot Yericho (38.2%) Psagot (32.3%) Ramallah Migron Mitzpeh Danny Kochav Ya'akov 4819 58 Ma'ale Michmash Giva'at Ze'ev Adam Kfar Adumim 289 Geva Binyamin Adam Neve Eretz Jericho 52 units Maale Hagit 112 units 69 Giv'on 52 Bnei Adam Mevo Horon 16 68 Alon Har Shmuel Vered Yericho Har Adar Almon 54 43 44 112 19 Mitzpe Yericho 2,028 Units West of Kfar Adumim 67 Beit Ha'arava Mizpe Yericho 67 units the Planned Barrier Almog Ma'ale Adumim (29.5%) Jerusalem 146 Keidar 58 21 Har Gilo 158 Beitar Illit Bethlehem 338 Neve Daniel Tekoa 28 Elazar 129 units Rosh Tzurim Efrata 66 units Bat Ayin 30 20 23 Kfar Eldad (Kedumim) West 37 66 Bat Ayin El'azar Tko'a Nokdim Alon 129 45 55 Shvut 60 units Kfar Etzion 25 Tkoa B-C 17 60 Maale Rechavam Tkoa D Karmei Tzur 60 Karmei Zur 19 24 60 units Ibei Hanachal 16 Kiryat Arba Gaza Strip Kiryat Arba 63 units Hebron 63 Gal Outpost Carmel Avigayil 27 23 Eshkolot Susiya 20 Tene 39 Sansana Metzadot Yehuda www.peacenow.org.il 21 26 ± 1:200,000.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Arrested Development: the Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank
B’TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 8 Hata’asiya St., Talpiot P.O. Box 53132 Jerusalem 91531 The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Tel. (972) 2-6735599 | Fax (972) 2-6749111 Barrier in the West Bank www.btselem.org | [email protected] October 2012 Arrested Development: The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank October 2012 Research and writing Eyal Hareuveni Editing Yael Stein Data coordination 'Abd al-Karim Sa'adi, Iyad Hadad, Atef Abu a-Rub, Salma a-Deb’i, ‘Amer ‘Aruri & Kareem Jubran Translation Deb Reich Processing geographical data Shai Efrati Cover Abandoned buildings near the barrier in the town of Bir Nabala, 24 September 2012. Photo Anne Paq, activestills.org B’Tselem would like to thank Jann Böddeling for his help in gathering material and analyzing the economic impact of the Separation Barrier; Nir Shalev and Alon Cohen- Lifshitz from Bimkom; Stefan Ziegler and Nicole Harari from UNRWA; and B’Tselem Reports Committee member Prof. Oren Yiftachel. ISBN 978-965-7613-00-9 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Part I The Barrier – A Temporary Security Measure? ................. 7 Part II Data ....................................................................... 13 Maps and Photographs ............................................................... 17 Part III The “Seam Zone” and the Permit Regime ..................... 25 Part IV Case Studies ............................................................ 43 Part V Violations of Palestinians’ Human Rights due to the Separation Barrier ..................................................... 63 Conclusions................................................................................ 69 Appendix A List of settlements, unauthorized outposts and industrial parks on the “Israeli” side of the Separation Barrier .................. 71 Appendix B Response from Israel's Ministry of Justice .......................
[Show full text]
The Economic Base of Israel's Colonial Settlements in the West Bank
Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute The Economic Base of Israel’s Colonial Settlements in the West Bank Nu’man Kanafani Ziad Ghaith 2012 The Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS) Founded in Jerusalem in 1994 as an independent, non-profit institution to contribute to the policy-making process by conducting economic and social policy research. MAS is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of prominent academics, businessmen and distinguished personalities from Palestine and the Arab Countries. Mission MAS is dedicated to producing sound and innovative policy research, relevant to economic and social development in Palestine, with the aim of assisting policy-makers and fostering public participation in the formulation of economic and social policies. Strategic Objectives Promoting knowledge-based policy formulation by conducting economic and social policy research in accordance with the expressed priorities and needs of decision-makers. Evaluating economic and social policies and their impact at different levels for correction and review of existing policies. Providing a forum for free, open and democratic public debate among all stakeholders on the socio-economic policy-making process. Disseminating up-to-date socio-economic information and research results. Providing technical support and expert advice to PNA bodies, the private sector, and NGOs to enhance their engagement and participation in policy formulation. Strengthening economic and social policy research capabilities and resources in Palestine. Board of Trustees Ghania Malhees (Chairman), Ghassan Khatib (Treasurer), Luay Shabaneh (Secretary), Mohammad Mustafa, Nabeel Kassis, Radwan Shaban, Raja Khalidi, Rami Hamdallah, Sabri Saidam, Samir Huleileh, Samir Abdullah (Director General). Copyright © 2012 Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS) P.O.
[Show full text]
Israel: Growing Pains at 60
Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
[Show full text]
Tulkarm Feb 2020
BUSTANEI HEFETZ INDUSTRIAL ZONE RAMIFICATION ON TULKARM GOVERNORATE Fact Sheet February 2020 Settlement Expansion The Tulkarm governorate in the north west of the West Bank, is facing em- About JLAC inent risk of being severed, enclaved, and further dispossessed by settle- The Jerusalem Legal Aid and ment expansion as had the governorate of Qalqiliya been in preceding Human Rights Center (JLAC) is years. Falling along the green line (bordered by Israel along its entire a Palestinian non-governmental western boarder), the Tulkarm governate is fertile grounds for Israeli organization mandated with annexation and expansion into the West Bank, with efforts underway to providing pro-bono legal aid, ensure the contiguity of Israeli settlements within Palestinian bounds to community awareness, and each other and to Israel, at the expense of Palestinians security, livelihood advocacy in both East Jerusa- and larger rights to a viable homeland and self-determination. In addition lem and in the remainder of the to serving as close suburbs for Israeli urban hubs as Tel Aviv and West Bank. Netanya, settlements in the area also provide industrial zones for Israel and the ability to evade environmental/ labor laws, monopolize pillaged natural resource, and exploit the local population as cheap laborers. If planned settlement expansion efforts are implemented (along with associated bypass roads, check- points, and fences/walls) the settlements will serve to form a bloc enshrouded by the Wall which will enclave the city of Tulkarm, bisect the governorate and sever it from the governorate of Qalqiliya; annexing lands and pillaging resources along the way and strangulating the villages in the area, by rendering them with small access points in which their residents may come in and out of.
[Show full text]
November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qafﬁn Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Haﬁra e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
[Show full text]
The Springs of Gush Etzion Nature Reserve Nachal
What are Aqueducts? by the Dagan Hill through a shaft tunnel some 400 meters long. In addition to the two can see parts of the “Arub Aqueduct”, the ancient monastery of Dir al Banat (Daughters’ settlement was destroyed during the Bar Kochba revolt. The large winepress tells of around. The spring was renovated in memory of Yitzhak Weinstock, a resident of WATER OF GUSH ETZION From the very beginning, Jerusalem’s existence hinged on its ability to provide water aqueducts coming from the south, Solomon’s pools received rainwater that had been Monastery) located near the altered streambed, and reach the ancient dam at the foot THE SPRINGS OF GUSH ETZION settlement here during Byzantine times. After visiting Hirbat Hillel, continue on the path Alon Shvut, murdered on the eve of his induction into the IDF in 1993. After visiting from which you \turned right, and a few meters later turn right again, leading to the Ein Sejma, descend to the path below and turn left until reaching Dubak’s pool. Built A hike along the aqueducts in the "Pirim" (Shafts) for its residents. Indeed, during the Middle Canaanite period (17th century BCE), when gathered in the nearby valley as well as the water from four springs running at the sides of the British dam. On top of the British dam is a road climbing from the valley eastwards Start: Bat Ayin Israel Trail maps: Map #9 perimeter road around the community of Bat Ayin. Some 200 meters ahead is the Ein in memory of Dov (Dubak) Weinstock (Yitzhak’s father) Dubak was one of the first Jerusalem first became a city, its rulers had to contend with this problem.
[Show full text]
Radicalization of the Settlers' Youth: Hebron As a Hub for Jewish Extremism
© 2014, Global Media Journal -- Canadian Edition Volume 7, Issue 1, pp. 69-85 ISSN: 1918-5901 (English) -- ISSN: 1918-591X (Français) Radicalization of the Settlers’ Youth: Hebron as a Hub for Jewish Extremism Geneviève Boucher Boudreau University of Ottawa, Canada Abstract: The city of Hebron has been a hub for radicalization and terrorism throughout the modern history of Israel. This paper examines the past trends of radicalization and terrorism in Hebron and explains why it is still a present and rising ideology within the Jewish communities and organization such as the Hilltop Youth movement. The research first presents the transmission of social memory through memorials and symbolism of the Hebron hills area and then presents the impact of Meir Kahana’s movement. As observed, Hebron slowly grew and spread its population and philosophy to the then new settlement of Kiryat Arba. An exceptionally strong ideology of an extreme form of Judaism grew out of those two small towns. As analyzed—based on an exhaustive ethnographic fieldwork and bibliographic research—this form of fundamentalism and national-religious point of view gave birth to a new uprising of violence and radicalism amongst the settler youth organizations such as the Hilltop Youth movement. Keywords: Judaism; Radicalization; Settlers; Terrorism; West Bank Geneviève Boucher Boudreau 70 Résumé: Dès le début de l’histoire moderne de l’État d’Israël, les villes d’Hébron et Kiryat Arba sont devenues une plaque tournante pour la radicalisation et le terrorisme en Cisjordanie. Cette recherche examine cette tendance, explique pourquoi elle est toujours d’actualité ainsi qu’à la hausse au sein de ces communautés juives.
[Show full text]
78% of Construction Was in “Isolated Settlements”*
Peace Now’s Annual Settlement Construction Report for 2017 Construction Starts in Settlements were 17% Above Average in 2017 78% of Construction was in “Isolated Settlements”* Settlement Watch, Peace Now Key findings – Construction in the West Bank, 2017 (East Jerusalem excluded) 1 According to Peace Now's count, 2,783 new housing units began construction in 2017, around 17% higher than the yearly average rate since 2009.2 78% (2,168 housing units) of the new construction was in settlements east of the proposed Geneva Initiative border, i.e. settlements that are likely to be evicted in a two-state agreement. 36% (997 housing units) of the new construction was in areas that are east of the route of the separation barrier. Another 46% (1,290 units) was between the built and the planned route of the fence. Only 18% was west of the built fence. At least 10% (282 housing units) of the construction was illegal according to the Israeli laws applied in the Occupied Territories (regardless of the illegality of all settlements according to the international law). Out of those, 234 units (8% of the total construction) were in illegal outposts. The vast majority of the new construction, 91% (2,544 housing units), was for permanent structures, while that the remainder 9% were new housing units in the shape of mobile homes both in outposts and in settlements. 68 new public buildings (such as schools, synagogues etc.) started to be built, alongside 69 structures for industry or agriculture. Advancement of Plans and Tenders (January-December 2017) 6,742 housing units were advanced through promotions of plans for settlements, in 59 different settlements (compared to 2,657 units in 2016).
[Show full text]
Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 19 N umber 3 May-June 2009 SETTLEMENT FREEZE REDUX* By Geoffrey Aronson settlements, the idea still has merit. “If there is procrastination by Israel But achieving the goal of peace and Israel’s ever-expanding network on the two-state solution or there is no security for both Israelis and Pale- of civilian settlements in the occu - stinians requires a strategy rooted pied territories is viewed by its par - clear American vision for how this is in historical experience and the tisans and opponents alike as the going to play out in 2009, then all the vital requirements of both peoples. most significant obstacle to the tremendous credibility that Obama has A settlement freeze falls short of creation of a viable, sovereign Pale- worldwide and in this region will evap - this standard. Settlement evacua - stinian state. Palestinian Authority orate overnight if nothing comes out in tion, not a freeze, is a more credi - chairman Mahmoud Abbas is con - May.” ble and necessary objective, more ditioning a renewal of discussions closely attuned to the essential King Abdullah of Jordan, with Israel on an Israeli commit - long-term interests of both parties The Times , May 11, 2009 ment to freeze all settlement, echo - and firmly rooted in past Israeli ing a demand originally made in practice, most recently in Gaza. 1992 during the pre-Oslo Wash- Placing a freeze at the center of a ington talks. U.S. diplomacy. More often than not, U.S.
[Show full text]
Initial Analysis of the Israeli Supreme Court's Decision in the Settlements Regularization Law Case
Initial Analysis of the Israeli Supreme Court's Decision in the Settlements Regularization Law Case HCJ 1308/17, Silwad Municipality, et al. v. The Knesset, et. al Issued 15 June 2020 On 9 June 2020, the Israeli Supreme Court decided in an 8 to 1 judgment to cancel the "Settlements Regularization Law for Judea and Samaria [the West Bank]".1 In a ruling spanning 107 pages, the court found that the law violates the rights of Palestinians to property, equality and dignity disproportionately.2 The Knesset passed the controversial law in February 2017. The law provides that the State of Israel could expropriate privately-owned Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank, and to retroactively “regularize” or “legalize” the Israeli settlements built on it. An Addendum to the Law identified 16 settlements to which the law would apply (see Annex at the end of this paper, which also includes a list of the Palestinian villages on which these settlements encroach). According to the court's decision, as of 2016, the scope of Israeli construction on privately-owned Palestinian land in the West Bank amounted to 3,455 structures, of which 1,285 are residential buildings or public institutions.3 The Court’s decision is based on several main legal principles: 1. International law and the non-sovereignty principle applies to the West Bank: The decision stresses that since June 1967, the laws that apply in the West Bank are the laws of "belligerent occupation," supplemented by international human rights law. Further, “the practical implication is that the law of the State of Israel does not apply in the region.”4 1 HCJ 1308/17, Silwad Municipality, et al.
[Show full text]
Palestinian Olive Agony 2018 ( a Statistical Report on Israeli Violations)
Palestinian Olive Agony 2018 ( A Statistical Report on Israeli Violations) Prepared by: Monitoring Israeli Violations Team Land Research Center Arab Studies Society - Jerusalem March 2019 ARAB STUDIES SOCIETY – Land Research Center (LRC) – Jerusalem 1 Halhul – Main Road, Tel: 02-2217239 , Fax: 02 -2290918 , P.O.Box: 35, E-mail: [email protected], URL: www.lrcj.org The olive tree have always been a thorn on the Israeli occupation’s side Deep rooted in the history of this land.. its oil is still sacred enlightening its temples Its branches play with farmers’ children.. and suffer from agonizing pain when touched by a settler’s saw That is, the Palestinian olive tree.. standing still on the face of the Israeli occupation’s sadism Burnt.. but reborn from its dust like a phoenix Cut.. but grows anew from its roots Stolen.. and when planted in their settlements. .becomes darkened and cloudy The Israeli occupiers tried to contain the olive tree , but it refused.. so they decided to uproot it from the land of Palestine , but failed and will fail The olive trees are a constant tar get by the occupation but they are still steadfast and refuses to surrender .. The olive tree stands for Palestinians' very existence, and their cultural identity and civilization, it is a testimony from history on the Palestinian land’s Arabism. Jamal Talab Al -Amleh LRC general manager Jerusalem – Palestine ARAB STUDIES SOCIETY – Land Research Center (LRC) – Jerusalem 2 Halhul – Main Road, Tel: 02-2217239 , Fax: 02-2290918 , P.O.Box: 35, E-mail: [email protected], URL: www.lrcj.org In 201 8, Land Research Center documented attacks that targeted olive trees, though daily monitoring: • 117 attacks took place , 90 of them were perpet rated by settlers from settlements nearby olive groves, while 27 were perpetrated by the occupation forces.
[Show full text]
Avoiding Last Period Defection Within Israeli-Palestinian Final
Breaking the Stalemate: Avoiding Last Period Defection within Israeli-Palestinian Final Status Negotiations through Statistical Modeling John J. Villa Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a B.A. with Honors From the Political Science Department at Duke University March 31, 2017 1 Forward: --First, I must thank the phenomenal Political Science Department at Duke University and my thesis advisor Dr. Michael C. Munger for their tremendous support while I developed my thesis and during my general education. Dr. Munger’s leadership, creativity, and generosity provided the foundation upon which I write to you, and his impact upon this publication was critical. --To Dr. Abdeslam E. M. Maghraoui, thank you for instructing me in three tremendous Middle East Studies courses and helping me establish the foundational aspects of this publication. Your mentorship and sharing of knowledge provided an entry point into subject matter far beyond anything I ever thought I would reach. -- To Dr. Mbaye Lo, thank you for your unwavering support, challenging materials, and educated discussions. Our long debates in your office are some of my fondest memories of my time in Durham. --To the staff of the Data Visualization Lab staff at Duke University consisting of Mark Thomas, Angela Zoss, John Little, and Jena Happ, your expertise, patience, and assistance in ArcGIS, Open Refine, and general data manipulation were extremely helpful during the computational portion of this publication and for that I thank you. --To Ryan Denniston, your assistance in Microsoft Excel functions and ArcGIS modeling was impeccable. This is, of course, in addition to your generosity, patience, and creatively which I’m sure were tested day after day coding together in the lab as you guided me through the ever-more complex ArcGIS models.
[Show full text]