DOCSLIB.ORG

February, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
February, 2016 Keeping Tabs Monthly News from The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee Justice Doody | Long-term Vision | Arnup Cup | TAS Awards | Interview | Upcoming Events Young Advocates’ Standing Committee Call for Applications The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee is seeking energetic junior Society members to become part of the 2016-2017 committee. This is an excellent opportunity to build your profile within The Advocates’ Society and your local bar. Click here for the YASC application form CHAIR CHAT miss the Trivia Challenge for Charity at Hot House Café on March 22, Wine and Cheese with the Bench at Campbell House on April 21 and Toronto Mentoring Dinner Series: CHAIR Time is on Your Side on May 16. Throughout this term, the Young Advocates’ Standing Committee has been busy participating in every aspect of BY: YASHODA RANGANATHAN The Advocates’ Society’s work—from interventions and publications to mentoring and networking events promoting the interest of advocates. If you are a Young Advocate (ten years of call or less), enthusiastic and interested in February’s brief display of snow seems to already be thawing contributing to the important work of the Society please and spring draws nearer. Looking forward to unwrapping consider applying to YASC by April 1. The application form my four-month-old’s warm layers so he can better see the can be found HERE. world around him when winter is done, as we walk to farmers’ markets, shops and baby programs around the city. As we all unwrap our warm layers, the Young Advocates’ Standing Committee will host a series of networking and Yashoda mentoring events for young advocates. In particular don’t The Young Advocates’ Standing Committee (“YASC”) is a standing committee of The Advocates’ Society with a mandate to be a voice for young advocates (advocates who are ten years of call or fewer) within the Society and within the profession. We do this through networking/mentoring events, by publishing articles by and for young advocates, and by raising issues of concern to young advocates as we work with the Society’s Board of Directors. Keeping Tabs | February 2016 | Page 1 one’s work is not an exercise in self- genuine interest in the response. JUSTICE DOODY gratification; it is essential to be a successful litigator in whom the court Braek Urquhart, Articling Student places its utmost trust. It’s how cases Assisting Peter with a commercial WHAT ADVOCATES HAVE are won. And Peter should know. He arbitration has been a highlight of my LEARNED FROM has had an outstanding career indeed. articling term. By working with Peter MR. JUSTICE DOODY and observing him in action, I have seen Jon Doody the level of hard work, preparation and I have been very fortunate to have professionalism he expects from himself Justice Peter K. Doody, the Vice- had the ability to call on my father’s and instills in others. I consider myself President of The Advocates’ Society, knowledge and expertise lucky to have learned from Peter’s was appointed to the Ontario throughout law school and dedication to his profession and craft at Court of Justice, effective into my career. He has the height of his career. February 24, 2016. Justice always been willing to Doody managed a large stop whatever he was Karen Perron and varied litigation doing, no matter how Peter was a great sounding board to practice focused on important, to answer consult for practical advice and to arbitration, commercial any questions I had, debate questions of law. His best advice litigation and public, no matter how trivial. to me can be summed up as follows: be administrative and I have no doubt, clear and concise and stay out of the insurance law. Justice however, that the weeds! As litigators, we tend to want Doody will be a great asset patience he showed me the last word on each issue raised by to the bench but he will also was equally shared with our adversary but effective advocacy is be greatly missed as an executive anyone who asked him for help. knowing when to stay focused in your member of The Advocates’ Society and He has always shown a keen desire to argument. as a partner at Borden Ladner Gervais help others to continue to learn and LLP in Ottawa. hone their legal skills. His love of the Tom Ozere law is apparent, and he is always open I had a civil trial against Peter. He made To commemorate Justice Doody’s to discussing and debating a different a successful objection based on the appointment, the Keeping Tabs team approach than his own. He has never collateral fact rule. He is the only lawyer asked a number of young and young- been unwilling to admit he may be that I have ever seen make an objection at-heart advocates one question: “What wrong, though granted he rarely is. based on the collateral fact rule in a civil have you learned by working with Peter Personally, I will forever cherish being case. He was clearly the only person Doody?” able to share counsel table with him on in the courtroom who knew what the a trial last year, especially since I will collateral fact rule was. Michelle Doody no longer be able to share a courtroom I learned these rules from my dad: work with him. He has always been, and will Nadia Effendi hard, be kind, stay humble and there is continue to be, my role model both in Through working closely with Peter at never any need to be a bully. and out of the courtroom. BLG for over a decade, I have learned the art of advocacy. Peter’s dedication Barbara McIsaac Q.C. Duncan Ault to the law and the clients he served Peter Doody has always represented to I learned that the practice of law can has been something I have sought me the ‘ideal’ lawyer. Whether it be a be a joyful experience. Peter has an to emulate in my career. Peter is the civil litigation issue or a criminal issue, abiding love for the law and a passion epitome of a meticulously prepared he always asks that next question. There for every facet of litigation. It is little lawyer who practIces with integrity and is always more to know or understand wonder Peter relishes advocacy as he has been an exemplary role model for about the case. Peter always knows that is so skilled at it. They say Magellan many. He will be missed at BLG but our there is more to be known. That will be really liked exploring. Happily, for loss to the bench is the gain of the justice a terrific attribute as a judge and I know those fortunate enough to work with system as a whole. that Peter will be a terrific judge. him, Peter’s joy is infectious. David W. Scott O.C., Q.C. Natalia Rodriguez Justin Mohammed If you ask Doody to join you as a junior Working with Peter has taught me Peter Doody demonstrates the you will end up listening to him argue so much about the importance of importance of curiosity in the practice your case. preparation. Every sentence in a factum of law, a rare attribute in a profession must be necessary, every clause in a where people often feel compelled to Congratulations Justice Doody on your contract scrutinized, every piece of give the illusion of knowing it all. He appointment and thank you for your evidence considered. It is not enough is always ready to learn more, never hard work on behalf of your friends at to do “just enough”. Diligence in fears to ask questions, and takes a The Advocates’ Society. Keeping Tabs | February 2016 | Page 2 way to build one’s reputation, skill set, or capital within the LONG-TERM VISION firm. The results bear this out: Lucas was named a Lexpert Rising Star in 2011 and won The Advocates’ Society’s Arleen Goss Young Advocates’ Award (2011), among other well- deserved accolades. Lucas was made a partner at Lerners in FREE TIME: WRITING, SPEAKING, AND 2012 after just 6 years at the Bar and only 2 years at Lerners. PRO BONO As it turns out, giving his time away for free—while JOHN ADAIR, ADAIR BARRISTERS LLP generating precisely zero dollars of revenue for his firm—has allowed Lucas to build a profile and reputation that put him DAVID CAMPBELL, at the top of his cohort. ROGERS PARTNERS LLP Rahool Agarwal, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP Young lawyers want to Rahool Agarwal was called to the Bar in 2007, after articling get ahead. They want at Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP. He practiced as an associate to succeed. To achieve. at Blakes briefly before moving to Norton Rose in November The most obvious, and the “easiest” path to doing so is to 2007. focus on billable hours (read: revenue generation) and client relationships. There is little doubt that those are a necessary Rahool, remarkably, has appeared as lead counsel in the part of any lawyer’s development; we cannot, after all, Supreme Court of Canada four times in nine years of practice, survive without clients and revenue. including on such diverse matters as Cuthbertson v. Rasouli (discretion of physicians to withdraw life-support) and NS There’s another way aside from billable work: give your time v. Her Majesty the Queen (removal of niqab during cross- away. Like, for free. examination). Rahool developed a pro bono practice early in his career, and has worked hard to maintain it while building This means writing, speaking, and pro bono work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Faculty of Law (Undergraduate) Programs, Courses and University Regulations 2014-2015
    Faculty of Law (Undergraduate) Programs, Courses and University Regulations 2014-2015 This PDF excerpt of Programs, Courses and University Regulations is an archived snapshot of the web content on the date that appears in the footer of the PDF. Archival copies are available at www.mcgill.ca/study. This publication provides guidance to prospects, applicants, students, faculty and staff. 1 . McGill University reserves the right to make changes to the information contained in this online publication - including correcting errors, altering fees, schedules of admission, and credit requirements, and revising or cancelling particular courses or programs - without prior notice. 2 . In the interpretation of academic regulations, the Senate is the ®nal authority. 3 . Students are responsible for informing themselves of the University©s procedures, policies and regulations, and the speci®c requirements associated with the degree, diploma, or certi®cate sought. 4 . All students registered at McGill University are considered to have agreed to act in accordance with the University procedures, policies and regulations. 5 . Although advice is readily available on request, the responsibility of selecting the appropriate courses for graduation must ultimately rest with the student. 6 . Not all courses are offered every year and changes can be made after publication. Always check the Minerva Class Schedule link at https://horizon.mcgill.ca/pban1/bwckschd.p_disp_dyn_sched for the most up-to-date information on whether a course is offered. 7 . The academic publication year begins at the start of the Fall semester and extends through to the end of the Winter semester of any given year. Students who begin study at any point within this period are governed by the regulations in the publication which came into effect at the start of the Fall semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Moot Court Program
    MOOT COURT PROGRAM 2018-2019 DESCRIPTIONS AND PRE-REQUISITES 1. ARNUP CUP 2. COMPETITION MOOT 3. DAVIES’ CANADIAN CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW MOOT 4. DONALD G.H. BOWMAN TAX MOOT 5. GALE CUP MOOT 6. HAROLD G. FOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW MOOT 7. JOHN H. JACKSON MOOT COURT COMPETITION (FORMERLY ELSA) 8. KAWASKIMHON NATIONAL ABORIGINAL MOOT 9. LASKIN MOOT 10. MATHEWS DINSDALE AND CLARKE LABOUR ARBITRATION MOOT 11. OTLA CUP 12. WALSH FAMILY LAW MOOT 13. WALSH FAMILY (NEGOTIATIONS) MOOT 14. WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT 15. WILLMS & SHIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAW MOOT 16. WILSON MOOT 17. PHILIP C. JESSUP INTERNATIONAL LAW MOOT THE ARNUP CUP The Arnup Cup is an annual trial advocacy competition involving two-person teams from Ontario law schools. This moot involves a judge and jury trial scenario in which each team examines and cross-examines witnesses, deals with evidentiary and procedural issues, and addresses the jury (opening and closing). The panel of jurors consists of members of the Advocates Society who act as assessors of the students. The moot problem has been a criminal one for the past several years. The competition is organized by The Advocates' Society and their sponsor WeirFoulds LLP. Top two regional teams advance to the Sopinka Cup in Ottawa. https://www.advocates.ca/TAS/Professional_Development/Moots/TAS/Professional_Develop ment/Moots.aspx?hkey=176fcbc0-6402-4c6b-8eb1-54c5745172a6 http://www.weirfoulds.com/WeirFoulds-Proud-Sponsor-Arnup-Cup-2018 Participation is made possible by sponsors WeirFoulds. Organized by the Advocates' Society Selection Process: Present a five minute oral argument before a panel of judges at the general tryouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion and Integrity Lead Gitzel to the Top CEO of Cameco Corporation, Tim Gitzel
    SPRING/SUMMER 2012 College of Law From university to uranium: passion and integrity lead Gitzel to the top CEO of Cameco Corporation, Tim Gitzel Alumni feature: Tim Gitzel Centennial 2012: See you there! Discovering gold on and off the ice 100 YEARS LAW SPRING/SUMMER 2012 Published by the College of Law at the University of Saskatchewan, of NOTE contains news and updates from the college as well as information relevant to our alumni and all of our college community. To submit information or articles for of NOTE, or to send us your latest news, whether personal or professional, please contact: EDITOR Sarah Trefiak Communications Officer College of Law University of Saskatchewan 15 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A6 Email: [email protected] PHOTOGRAPHY Cameco Corporation, www.cameco.com Josh Schaefer, U of S Huskies Sarah Trefiak, University of Saskatchewan Shannon Seymour, University of Saskatchewan Stobbe Photography, www.stobbephoto.ca table of contents Dean’s Message . 2 Centennial 2012: See you there! . 6 U of S welcomes 40th group of aboriginal law students . 8 Honorary Doctor of Laws Blaine Favel . 8 STLA Spring Conference held at college . 9 Administrative Staff Changes . 9 Success of guest speaker program continues . 10 Career Office Update . 11 College welcomes two full-time faculty members . 12 Faculty Notes . 12 CBA’s Legal Aid Leader Award . 13 Judicial Appointments . 13 Queen’s Council 2011 . 13 From university to uranium: Passion and integrity lead Gitzel to the top . 14 Alumni Notes . 15 Captain Ross: Discovering gold on and off the ice . 16 College celebrates 2012 graduates . 18 First Year Welcoming Ceremony .
    [Show full text]
  • Dispatches from the Energy Industry
    ALUMNI MAGAZINE WITHOUT PREJUDICE SPRING 2016 DISPATCHES FROM THE ENERGY INDUSTRY Thank you to Moodys Gartner LLP for your generous five-year, $100,000 gift in support of the Bowman National Tax Moot team and student research assistantships to aid faculty research in the area of taxation law. JENNY KHAKH Aspiring Mooter // Class 2018 DEAN’S MESSAGE Spring 2016 UAlberta Law ALUMNI MAGAZINE SPRING 2016 EDITOR Jill Rutherford elcome to the Spring 2016 issue of Without Prejudice, the University of ASSISTANT EDITOR WAlberta Faculty of Law alumni magazine. As alumni, you are members Gillian Reid of a community more than 100 years in the making; a community with a distinguished tradition of learning the law and engaging in public service ART DIRECTION AND DESIGN – locally, nationally, and internationally. In this issue, we look back on the Backstreet Communications year that was to celebrate the many accomplishments of our faculty, staff, CONTRIBUTING WRITERS students, and alumni. Our cover story examines the challenges facing the Matthew Dolan, Jeff Kubik, Gillian Reid, energy industry, with commentary from professors David Percy, Q.C. and Jill Rutherford, Michael Swanberg Dr. Cameron Jefferies, as well as from distinguished alumni providing counsel or leading change in an industry critical to Alberta and Canada. Visit us online at The 2015-2016 academic year had many highlights – flip to the Year in www.lawschool.ualberta.ca and find us on: Review section to see a selection of photos – including the swearing in to the Supreme Court of Canada of The Honourable Mr. Justice Russell Brown; the promotion to full Professor of Cameron Hutchison and Vice Dean Moin Yahya; the announcement of three new Assistant Professors to the Faculty and two Visiting Without Prejudice is published annually Assistant Professors to increase our scholarly depth, strength, and diversity; by the Faculty of Law, with a circulation and a tremendously successful competitive moot season for our students.
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Simões | Miller Thomson
    RELATED SERVICES Ana Simões Construction Litigation Partner | Toronto Insurance Defence 416.595.8677 [email protected] RELATED INDUSTRIES Construction and Infrastructure Insurance & Risk Management RELATED FOCUS AREAS Lloyd’s of London and International Insurance Biography Ana has a broad insurance litigation practice encompassing property and casualty claims, including motor vehicle, personal injury, and construction claims as well as professional liability, including architects, engineers, appraisers and medical paraprofessionals. Ana also acts for the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches. Ana has appeared before masters, judges, and arbitrators, and has appeared before the Superior Court of Justice, Financial Services Commission of Ontario, and the Landlord and Tenant Board. Ana summered and articled with Miller Thomson and joined the firm as an Associate following her call to the Ontario Bar in June 2012. Before returning to law school in 2008, Ana worked as a legal assistant for 20 years gaining experience in civil litigation, insurance and corporate finance. During this time, she also obtained her law clerk diploma from the Institute of Law Clerks of Ontario in real estate and litigation. While at the University of Ottawa, Ana was actively involved with all aspects of student life: she was a caseworker at Ottawa U’s Legal Clinic, assisted with the Sopinka Cup Moot Competition, mentored first-year students and participated in LEAF’s “No Means No” presentations to high- school students. She was also a founding member of the
    [Show full text]
  • Amp Student Manual.Pdf
    Windsor Law Advocacy and Mooting Program At Windsor Law, experiential learning is a key component of your legal education. The Windsor Law Advocacy and Mooting Program (AMP) exposes students to a variety of mock advocacy competitions including mooting (appellate advocacy), mock trial competitions, and mock mediation, client counseling and negotiation competitions. Windsor Law competes in different competitions each year. Please contact Ms. Brittney Murdock ([email protected]) for more information about AMP. Application Information The process for applying to the Windsor Law Advocacy and Mooting Program is as follows: 1. Applications are due no later than 12:00 pm on Friday, September 7th, 2018. • Students will submit their 2018-2019 Moot Application online via the Law Moots website: http://www.uwindsor.ca/law/1288/moots. • For-credit moots will be applied for collectively within one application. • Non-credit moots will maintain their own applications. Refer online for instructions on the application processes for these moots. • All moot applications will require a cover letter, resume, unofficial transcripts and record of current courses. Please see each moot application for additional information. 2. Each application is sent to the coaches for their review and consideration. 3. In light of the highly competitive applications received, the call back date and time has been set for Friday, September 14th, beginning at 9:00 am. This will allow coaches who wish to do so, the opportunity to interview applicants before selecting a team. In exceptional circumstances, coaches of a particular advocacy competition may need to contact applicants before September 14th. • All team members will receive their "offers" on the same day, by email, in staggered intervals.
    [Show full text]
  • Moots Available to Uvic Law Students 2020-21 Update
    Moots Available to UVic Law Students 2020-21 Update Selection for Mooting Teams Selection for mooting teams is by competition, which occurs in early September. Students cannot register for LAW 365 Legal Mooting unless they are selected to participate in a moot through the selection process. Students should therefore register in a full course load in June, and drop a course if they are selected for a moot. Note: In any given year, it is possible that the Faculty will not participate in one or more of the moots listed in this document. Information about the mooting program for the year will be available in early September. Researcher Position Some moots may have a researcher position if permitted by the rules of the moot. Researchers get slightly less credit than students who act as counsel, and do not normally travel with the team to attend the moot. Selection for researcher positions will also take place in September. For more information about Legal Mooting, see the JD and JD/JID Planning and Course Selection Guides. Academic Credit Credit for moots is awarded in the spring term unless special permission is sought and granted by the Associate Dean Academic and Students Relations. This permission will only be granted in exceptional circumstances as the moot competitions occur in the spring term. Students who participate in moots as researchers get slightly less credits than those who act as counsel. Students may participate in more than one moot competition during their program, including the same moot competition. Students cannot participate in more than one moot in a single academic year.
    [Show full text]
  • Robson Hall Faculty Of
    Welcome To ROBSON HALL Table of Contents Robson Hall Law 3 Message from the Dean 9 Bachelor of Laws - LL.B. 10 Master of Laws - LL.M. 14 Faculty 16 Law School Programs, Organizations & Publications 18 Social Activities, Sports & Student Groups 21 The University of Manitoba 24 The City of Winnipeg 25 Admissions 26 Finanical Aid, Scholarships & Awards 29 Academic Support & Career Development 31 Tuition 31 Contact Information 32 ROBSON HALL FACULTY OF LAW I 3 Graduates of Robson Hall have “ gone on to distinguished careers The Faculty of Law at the University in practice, on the bench, in business, in policy work and in a of Manitoba has a long established vast range of other careers where and outstanding reputation for their rigorous education has enhanced their ability to perform producing excellent lawyers and well at the highest levels. As our Alumni have proven, a future that rounded graduates. starts at Robson Hall Faculty of Law can lead to ground breaking ” legal work anywhere in the world. ROBSON HALL FACULTY OF LAW I 4 Robson Hall Faculty of Law There are many reasons to choose the Faculty of Law at the University of Manitoba. Robson Hall offers Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) and Master of Laws (LL.M.) degrees. The LL.B. degree is balanced between doctrinal, perspective and skills based learning to prepare our graduates for the future. The LL.M. degree is a thesis-based program that permits students to develop an in-depth, critical understanding of a particular area of law. LL.M. students may pursue legal research on any topic and from any perspective that interests them.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of British Columbia
    ` Annual Report 2019 Supreme Court of British Columbia www.bccourts.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE .......................... 1 JURISDICTION OF THE COURT ....................................................................... 13 CHANGES TO THE COURT’S COMPLEMENT ...................................................... 16 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE .............................................................................. 24 CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE .............................................................................. 25 CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE ........................................................................ 26 EDUCATION COMMITTEE ............................................................................ 28 FAMILY LAW COMMITTEE ........................................................................... 30 JOINT COURTS TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ....................................................... 32 JUDICIAL ACCESS POLICY WORKING COMMITTEE .............................................. 33 LAW CLERKS COMMITTEE ........................................................................... 35 LIBRARY COMMITTEE ................................................................................. 37 PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ....................................................................... 38 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT .................................................................. 40 MASTERS OF THE SUPREME COURT ............................................................... 49 REGISTRARS
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ` Annual Report 2019 Supreme Court of British Columbia www.bccourts.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................... I REPORT OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE .......................... 1 JURISDICTION OF THE COURT ....................................................................... 13 CHANGES TO THE COURT’S COMPLEMENT ...................................................... 16 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE .............................................................................. 24 CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE .............................................................................. 25 CRIMINAL LAW COMMITTEE ........................................................................ 26 EDUCATION COMMITTEE ............................................................................ 28 FAMILY LAW COMMITTEE ........................................................................... 30 JOINT COURTS TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ....................................................... 32 JUDICIAL ACCESS POLICY WORKING COMMITTEE .............................................. 33 LAW CLERKS COMMITTEE ........................................................................... 35 LIBRARY COMMITTEE ................................................................................. 37 PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ....................................................................... 38 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT .................................................................. 40 MASTERS
    [Show full text]
  • Robson Hall Clinical Experience Information 2020-2021
    Robson Hall Clinical Experience Information 2020-2021 Table of Contents Clinical Experience Opportunities for Law Students .............................................................................. 2 Mini Moot ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Competitive Moot Program..................................................................................................................... 3 Fox – Intellectual Property Davies – Corporate/Securities Gale – Criminal/Constitutional Bowman – Tax Laskin – Constitutional/Administrative Bastarche – En Français Advocacy Trials ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Negotiations Competitions ..................................................................................................................... 8 Tryouts and Selection Process ............................................................................................................ 9 National Negotiation Competition ....................................................................................................... 9 Selection Process .............................................................................................................................. 10 1 Clinical Experience Opportunities for Law Students Practical advocacy opportunities are an amazing way for law students to gain valuable clinical experience that
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective This Is Our Report to the Community
    Annual Report 2013–14 Common Law Section, Faculty of Law retrospective This is our report to the community. In it, we tell you who we are and what we did in the academic year 2013–14. Annual Report 2013–14 Common Law Section, Faculty of Law University of Ottawa CONTENTS Who We Are 2 Awards and Honours 5 Activities at Law School Centres 5 What We Do In the Classroom 9 Provide Opportunity… 9 In the General and the Specialized… 9 With New Approaches to Legal Pedagogy 10 Faculty Interest Groups 10 Students Continued to Learn through Doing in New Initiatives… 12 By Blending Doctrine with Skill Acquisition… 13 On Subjects Ripped from the Headlines… 14 In Order to Change the World… 14 Across Disciplines… 14 And Across Borders… 15 Mooting Excellence 15 Breaking Up the Silos 17 What We Do Outside the Classroom 20 Our Research Attracts Financial Support from External Agencies and from the University 20 And that Financial Support Benefits our Students… 22 We Publish… 22 And We Contribute More Generally to Academic Scholarship… 22 But More than Write, We Act… 23 We Serve on Commissions and Appear before Courts… 23 We Join Boards and Consultative Bodies and Participate in Policy Colloquia… 24 We Participate in Policy Deliberations… 26 And Contribute to Discussions in both the Conventional and Social Media… 26 Supporting Student Scholarship 27 Student Public Interest Advocacy 28 Looking Forward to 2014–15 31 Annual Report Bibliography 33 Faculty Academic Publications Printed or Forthcoming During 2013–14 33 Presentations in 2013–14 40 Op-eds and Commentary in 2013–14 44 Who We Are The Faculty of Law, Common Law Section, of the University of Ottawa graduated its first class in 1960.
    [Show full text]