Dispatches from the Energy Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dispatches from the Energy Industry ALUMNI MAGAZINE WITHOUT PREJUDICE SPRING 2016 DISPATCHES FROM THE ENERGY INDUSTRY Thank you to Moodys Gartner LLP for your generous five-year, $100,000 gift in support of the Bowman National Tax Moot team and student research assistantships to aid faculty research in the area of taxation law. JENNY KHAKH Aspiring Mooter // Class 2018 DEAN’S MESSAGE Spring 2016 UAlberta Law ALUMNI MAGAZINE SPRING 2016 EDITOR Jill Rutherford elcome to the Spring 2016 issue of Without Prejudice, the University of ASSISTANT EDITOR WAlberta Faculty of Law alumni magazine. As alumni, you are members Gillian Reid of a community more than 100 years in the making; a community with a distinguished tradition of learning the law and engaging in public service ART DIRECTION AND DESIGN – locally, nationally, and internationally. In this issue, we look back on the Backstreet Communications year that was to celebrate the many accomplishments of our faculty, staff, CONTRIBUTING WRITERS students, and alumni. Our cover story examines the challenges facing the Matthew Dolan, Jeff Kubik, Gillian Reid, energy industry, with commentary from professors David Percy, Q.C. and Jill Rutherford, Michael Swanberg Dr. Cameron Jefferies, as well as from distinguished alumni providing counsel or leading change in an industry critical to Alberta and Canada. Visit us online at The 2015-2016 academic year had many highlights – flip to the Year in www.lawschool.ualberta.ca and find us on: Review section to see a selection of photos – including the swearing in to the Supreme Court of Canada of The Honourable Mr. Justice Russell Brown; the promotion to full Professor of Cameron Hutchison and Vice Dean Moin Yahya; the announcement of three new Assistant Professors to the Faculty and two Visiting Without Prejudice is published annually Assistant Professors to increase our scholarly depth, strength, and diversity; by the Faculty of Law, with a circulation and a tremendously successful competitive moot season for our students. of more than 7,000. It is distributed to As my second year as Dean draws to a close, my focus remains change alumni, faculty, students, staff, and friends of the University of Alberta, Faculty of Law. management and transformation, to preserve the best of our past and to All material is copyright ©2016, and may prepare our students for a challenging future. This includes ensuring top not be reprinted without express written quality curriculum for our students, attracting and retaining outstanding permission of the author. faculty, investing in frontline student services, fostering student mental Editor’s Note: All content submitted for health and wellness, and supporting inclusiveness and diversity. Each of publication is subject to editing. In some these priorities is driven by a desire to ensure that our students receive a cases, personal pronouns in Class Notes transformative law school experience at the University of Alberta, one that have been changed to first person. prepares them to make their mark – not only in the legal profession, but Canada Post Publications Agreement also in the community. No. 40063511 To that end, next year we are embarking on the development of a new PRINTED IN CANADA strategic plan for the Faculty – which will align with the University’s Institutional McCallum Printing Group, Inc. Strategic Plan for the coming decade – to ensure that we are well equipped to continue to respond to student needs. We will report on this in next year’s Return undeliverable copies to: magazine – and on the launch of our new Career Services Centre expected this Faculty of Law University of Alberta fall – but in the meantime, I’d like to thank you, our alumni, for your continued 177 Law Centre support of our faculty and students, and for modelling the important traditions Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5 of professionalism and service that are critical to our mission. // 3 // ALUMNI MAGAZINE content 6 Year In Review FEATURES 8 Dean’s Update Dispatches From the Energy Industry UAlberta Law professors and alumni on the challenges and opportunities 10 facing the industry 36 Moot Court Program A Commitment to the Law and Community: The Wachowich / 44 Wachowicz Family in Alberta University of Alberta Faculty of Law // 4 // 39 40 43 SECTIONS Alberta Law Review Spring Reception 35 Moot Court Program 36 Students Earn Prestigious Clerkships 38 Faculty Update In Conversation With... Terry Adido 39 University Update 17 Visiting Speakers 40 Activities 18 In the Media 20 In Gratitude Publications 21 Sessional Instructors 41 Honouring Teaching Excellence 22 In Memoriam: Alexander Pringle, Q.C. 23 Reunions Awards 24 Reunions 2015 42 From Law Professor to Alumni Weekend 2015 43 Canada’s Highest Court 25 From Classroom to Courtroom 26 Law School Legacies 44 New Assistant Professor and Visiting Assistant Professor Appointments 27 Class Notes 46 Students on the Move Recognition Faculty Celebrates Grand Law Students’ Association’s Re-Opening of McLennan Ross Hall 48 Mental Health and Wellness Committee Recognized 29 Staff Stories Magna Carta Visits Edmonton 30 Climbing to New Heights 49 Law Show 2016 31 Aboriginal Speaker Series 32 The Odishaw Family Philosophy 50 Faculty Celebrates UAlberta Pride Week 2016 34 Gift Report 51 // 5 // ALUMNI MAGAZINE YEAR IN 2 SEPTEMBER 2015 4 OCTOBER 2015 REVIEW Dean’s BBQ Dean Paton, Dino Bottos, Peter Sankoff and Eric Adams join Guba to welcome the Dean Paton, former Deans Percy and Bryden, Class of 2018. and a number of faculty members travelled to the Supreme Court for the welcoming ceremony for the newest member of the Court – the Hon. Mr. Justice Russell Brown – hosted by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin (LLB ’68). Justice Brown was a distinguished member of 1 SEPTEMBER 2015 3 SEPTEMBER 2015 our faculty from 2004-2013. 5 NOVEMBER 2015 Orientation Week Opening ceremonies for the Class of 2018 Distinguished Alumni Awards featured a welcome from Dean Paton, On September 24, 2015 the Faculty of Law ceremonial blessing from Eric Daniels, an welcomed Francis Saville (BA ’62, LLB Aboriginal Elder, remarks from Law Society ’65) and Alan Fielding (BA ’65, LLB ’69), of Alberta President James Eamon, Q.C., recipients of the University of Alberta 2015 Court of Appeal Justice the Hon. Madam Distinguished Alumni Award and Honour The Faculty of Law hosted a number of Justice Myra B. Bielby, and a keynote Award respectively for a special luncheon Magna Carta-themed events during the address from The Right Hon. Kim Campbell, in their honour. historic document’s visit to Edmonton. PC, CC, OBC, Q.C. A highlight was student group Ms. Magna Carta’s successful event attended by approximately 300 guests at the Legislative Assembly of Alberta Visitor Centre. University of Alberta Faculty of Law // 6 // 6 DECEMBER 2015 8 FEBRUARY 2016 10 APRIL 2016 A Case for Claus A special visitor stopped by the Law Centre to distribute gifts to the children of our faculty and staff. Law Show: Ferris Buellaw’s Farewell Celebration Day Off On April 19, the Faculty of Law hosted a The 20th anniversary of the Law Show – a farewell celebration for Professor Gerald tribute to the 1980s classic Ferris Bueller’s Day Robertson, Q.C., and Professor Elaine Off – took place at the Horowitz Performing Hughes, to honour their many years of Arts Theatre on February 5-6, 2016. dedicated service to the Faculty and to the broader legal community. 7 JANUARY 2016 9 MARCH 2016 Dean Paton attended the Alberta Law Conference in Calgary where Professor Mitchell McInnes was presented with the Distinguished Service Award for Scholarship and Christine Pratt was presented with the Distinguished Service Award in Pro Bono Legal The Faculty of Law and the Institute for Sexual Minority Studies and Services (ISMSS) hosted Service by the Canadian Bar Association – a UAlberta Pride Week event regarding human rights advocacy for same sex rights in the Alberta Branch and the Law Society of Caribbean. At this event we also had a chance to share some good news. Members of three Alberta at their annual Distinguished of our student groups – OUTlaw, an advocacy group founded in 2008 to serve and aid LGBTI Service Awards ceremony. law students and their allies, the Golden Bearristers rugby team, and the Tortfeasors hockey team – presented a cheque for $1,500 to Dr. Kris Wells, a representative of You Can Play, an organization committed to ensuring equality, respect, and safety for all athletes, without regard to sexual orientation. // 7 // ALUMNI MAGAZINE FEATURE By: Paul D. Paton DEAN’S UPDATE OCTOBER JANUARY MARCH MAY SEPTEMBER NOVEMBER FEBUARY 2016 2015 2015 DECEMBER2016 APRIL 2016 2015 2015 2016 2016 The 2015-2016 academic for student mental health counselling and referral services based at year saw the seeds of the Faculty. I am also hiring new transformation sown in 2014- staff to provide greater assistance 2015 start to grow at an with financial aid counselling, and have asked Vice Dean Moin Yahya unrelenting pace. We’ve turned to lead a committee to provide a corner and – with the help recommendations for Aboriginal and of our committed alumni – we Indigenous academic and cultural supports which we will implement and two extremely promising visiting will work with our students to next year. This year we doubled our assistant professors. This renewal continue building enhanced Career Services capacity, enhancing is critical for our ongoing success. our ability to provide advice on career access to an outstanding Further details on these appointments options and recruitment processes, can be found on page 27. I have an faculty and a transformative and offer programming to prepare ambitious plan for hiring to continue law school experience. Here students for legal careers. Our Career over the next two years. are some key milestones: Services Officers also liaise with the legal community throughout Canada STUDENT SERVICES to assist with the recruitment of FACULTY HIRING Investing in frontline services to our students for both traditional After a period of dramatic support our students is one of the and non-traditional placements.
Recommended publications
  • COURT JUSTICES, 1985-2013 Jean-Christophe Bédard-Rubin
    Paper prepared for the 2018 CPSA Annual Conference – Please do not cite nor circulate without permission HOW MUCH FRENCH DO THEY SPEAK ANYWAY? A BILINGUALISM INDEX FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 1985-2013 Jean-Christophe Bédard-Rubin & Tiago Rubin Draft paper prepared for the CPSA 2018 Annual Conference. Please do not cite nor circulate without permission. Mandatory bilingualism for Supreme Court judges tantalizes Canadian politics for at least ten years now. The advocates of judicial bilingualism have repeatedly tried (and failed) to enshrine into law the requirement for Supreme Court justices to be functionally bilingual, i.e. the ability to “read materials and understand oral argument without the need for translation or interpretation in French and English”. For them, integrating mandatory bilingualism as a legislative requirement in the appointment process is a panacea. Their opponents argue that language proficiency in French should not be a sine qua non condition for Supreme Court justiceship and that requiring it would prevent excellent candidates from being appointed. However, despite the fact that empirical statements abound on both sides, there is very little empirical evidence regarding the actual impact of unilingualism and bilingualism on Canadian judicial institutions and simply no evidence whatsoever about its impact on individual judges’ behavior. Building on our ongoing research on judicial bilingualism, in this paper we try to evaluate the level of bilingualism of individual justices. What our findings suggest is that the behavior of Francophone and Anglophone bilinguals is influenced by the linguistic competency of their colleagues. Our findings also suggest that some Anglophone justices that are deemed to be bilinguals do not behave very differently from their unilingual colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • CCCC Attended Supreme Court of Canada Hearing on the Aga Case
    Table of Contents • CCCC attended Supreme Court of Canada hearing on the Aga case CCCC attended Supreme Court of Canada hearing on the Aga case Analysis of current issues involving law, religion, and society, led by Barry W. Bussey, Director of Legal Affairs. By Barry W. Bussey CCCC (09.12.2020) - https://bit.ly/3nlGTQl - CCCC’s Director of Legal Affairs, Barry W. Bussey, represented the CCCC at the Supreme Court of Canada’s virtual hearing today (Dec 9) in the case of Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral, et al. v. Teshome Aga, (39094). CCCC was granted the opportunity to intervene in the case, and to file a brief, but was not given time for oral argument. Brief fact summary Several members of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church St. Mary Cathedral were on a committee that investigated a movement within the congregation. The committee reported to Archbishop Dimetros that the movement was heretical. The committee recommended action, including purging of heretics. When Archbishop Dimetros did not follow their recommendations, the committee members were robust in their opposition – to the point that they were warned of church discipline. Finally, they were suspended from membership. In response, they then sued in court. The church in return asked for summary judgment to dismiss the lawsuit. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice agreed with the church and dismissed the disgruntled members’ lawsuit, noting that the courts have no jurisdiction to hear such cases. However, the members appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal stated that courts could hear the case because there was a contract between the members and the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Law (Undergraduate) Programs, Courses and University Regulations 2014-2015
    Faculty of Law (Undergraduate) Programs, Courses and University Regulations 2014-2015 This PDF excerpt of Programs, Courses and University Regulations is an archived snapshot of the web content on the date that appears in the footer of the PDF. Archival copies are available at www.mcgill.ca/study. This publication provides guidance to prospects, applicants, students, faculty and staff. 1 . McGill University reserves the right to make changes to the information contained in this online publication - including correcting errors, altering fees, schedules of admission, and credit requirements, and revising or cancelling particular courses or programs - without prior notice. 2 . In the interpretation of academic regulations, the Senate is the ®nal authority. 3 . Students are responsible for informing themselves of the University©s procedures, policies and regulations, and the speci®c requirements associated with the degree, diploma, or certi®cate sought. 4 . All students registered at McGill University are considered to have agreed to act in accordance with the University procedures, policies and regulations. 5 . Although advice is readily available on request, the responsibility of selecting the appropriate courses for graduation must ultimately rest with the student. 6 . Not all courses are offered every year and changes can be made after publication. Always check the Minerva Class Schedule link at https://horizon.mcgill.ca/pban1/bwckschd.p_disp_dyn_sched for the most up-to-date information on whether a course is offered. 7 . The academic publication year begins at the start of the Fall semester and extends through to the end of the Winter semester of any given year. Students who begin study at any point within this period are governed by the regulations in the publication which came into effect at the start of the Fall semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiyaz Alibhai
    RELATED SERVICES Aiyaz Alibhai Commercial Litigation Partner | Vancouver Information Technology 604.643.1233 Intellectual Property [email protected] Marketing, Advertising & Product Compliance Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity Technology RELATED INDUSTRIES Biography Education Aiyaz Alibhai is an intellectual property lawyer, specialising in intellectual property protection, RELATED FOCUS AREAS licensing and enforcement, technology transactions, privacy and data protection. His work Privacy and Data Protection encompasses structuring and negotiating contracts for complex technology projects, IT agreements, intellectual property and technology licensing, collaboration agreements, R&D agreements, and e-commerce law issues. His expertise in litigation matters encompasses intellectual property litigation, unfair competition and trademark passing off litigation, brand protection, domain name disputes, trade mark oppositions, obtaining injunctive and restraining orders, business and cybercrimes. He has experience across all sectors, including aerospace, construction, life sciences and applied science industries, e-commerce businesses, hotel and hospitality businesses, fashion and retail sectors. He has presented on intellectual property protection for the fashion industry, intangible property protection strategies for Corporate General Counsel, customs and border protection and enforcement, privacy and data protection, block chain, board governance and cyber security issues. Professional achievements & leadership Professional
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Into Its Global Context, to Show Its Significance for Modern Business Society
    This second edition is intended to put corporate governance into its global context, to show its significance for modern business society. Written by the leading practitioners within the field, from 32 jurisdictions, this second edition will be a useful, 2ND EDITION first-hand reference material for practising lawyers and in-house attorneys who may counsel clients on their business in foreign countries. General Editor Akira Kawamura, India Rajiv K. Luthra, Sundeep South Korea Kyung-Yoon Lee Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Dudeja, Vaibhav Kakkar & Anshul & Richard J. Lee, Kim & Chang Preface Akira Kawamura, Jain, Luthra and Luthra Law Offices Spain Carlos Paredes Galego, Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Indonesia Hanim Hamzah, Uría Menéndez Foreword Martin Lipton, Wisnu Aji Wiradyo, Henry Sweden Peder Hammarskiöld Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Manullang, Roosdiono & Partners & Sandra Hein Kaznova, Argentina Pablo García Morillo, Israel Rachel Levitan & Hammarskiöld & Co. Marval O’Farrell & Mairal Yael Navon, Levitan Sharon & Co. Taiwan Chun-yih Cheng, Australia Hiroyuki Kano & Italy Claudio Visco & Formosa Transnational GOVERNANCE CORPORATE CORPORATE Andrew Hay, Clayton Utz Ernesto Pucci, Macchi di Attorneys at Law Cellere Gangemi Brazil Marta Viegas, Tozzini Freire Thailand Kasma Visitkitjakarn Japan Hiroki Kodate, & Napat Siri-armart, SERIES INTERNATIONAL Canada Jay M. Hoffman & Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Tilleke & Gibbins James Klotz, Miller Thomson LLP GOVERNANCE Malaysia Wooi Hong Tan, Turkey Kayra Üçer Cayman Islands Louis Mooney & Zaid Ibrahim & Co & Zeynep Ahu Sazci, Hergüner Tim Dawson, Mourant Ozannes The Netherlands Bilgen Özeke Attorney Partnership INTERNATIONAL SERIES China Xu Ping & Wei Kao, Willem Calkoen, NautaDutilh Ukraine Timur Bondaryev King & Wood Mallesons Portugal Maria da Conceição & Anna Zorya, Arzinger France Jacques Buhart Cabaços, PLMJ, Law Firm United Kingdom & Nicolas Lafont, Charles Martin & Mark Slade, McDermott Will & Emery Russia Vassily Rudomino, Anton Dzhuplin, Victoria Sivachenko Macfarlanes LLP Germany Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada
    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No. CV-18-00611214-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT of JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST B E T W E E N: SEARS CANADA INC., by ITS CO
    Court File No. CV-18-00611214-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST B E T W E E N: SEARS CANADA INC., BY ITS COURT-APPOINTED LITIGATION TRUSTEE, J. DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM, Q.C. Plaintiff - and - ESL INVESTMENTS INC., ESL PARTNERS LP, SPE I PARTNERS, LP, SPE MASTER I, LP, ESL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS, LP, EDWARD LAMPERT, EPHRAIM J. BIRD, DOUGLAS CAMPBELL, WILLIAM CROWLEY, WILLIAM HARKER, R. RAJA KHANNA, JAMES MCBURNEY, DEBORAH ROSATI, and DONALD ROSS Defendants BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE DEFENDANTS WILLIAM HARKER, WILLIAM CROWLEY, DONALD ROSS, EPHRAIM J. BIRD, JAMES MCBURNEY, AND DOUGLAS CAMPBELL MOTION TO STRIKE RETURNABLE APRIL 17, 2019 March 29, 2019 CASSELS BROCK & BLACKWELL LLP 2100 Scotia Plaza 40 King Street West Toronto, ON M5H 3C2 William J. Burden LSO #: 15550F Tel: 416.869.5963 Fax: 416.640.3019 [email protected] Wendy Berman LSO #: 32748J Tel: 416.860.2926 Fax: 416.640.3107 [email protected] Lawyers for the Defendants William Harker, William Crowley, Donald Ross, Ephraim J. Bird, James McBurney, and Douglas Campbell 2 TO: LAX O’SULLIVAN LISUS GOTTLIEB LLP 145 King Street West, Suite 2750 Toronto, ON M5H 1J8 Matthew P. Gottlieb LSO#: 32268B Tel: 416.644.5353 Fax: 416.598.3730 [email protected] Andrew Winton LSO #: 54473I Tel: 416.644.5342 Fax: 416.598.3730 [email protected] Philip Underwood LSO#: 73637W Tel: 416.645.5078 Fax: 416.598.3730 [email protected] Lawyers for the Plaintiff AND TO: BENNETT JONES LLP Barristers and Solicitors 1 First Canadian Place Suite 3400 P.O. Box 130 Toronto, ON M5X 1A4 Richard Swan LSO #:32076A Tel: 416.777.7479 Fax: 416.863.1716 [email protected] Jason Berall LSO #: 68011F Tel: 416.777.5480 Fax: 416.863.1716 [email protected] Lawyers for the Defendants R.
    [Show full text]
  • Carissima Mathen*
    C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release – June 19, 2020 the ADVOCATES' SOCIETY
    For immediate release – June 19, 2020 THE ADVOCATES’ SOCIETY ESTABLISHES THE MODERN ADVOCACY TASK FORCE The Advocates’ Society has established a Modern Advocacy Task Force to make recommendations for the reform of the Canadian justice system. The recommendations of the Task Force will seek to combine the best measures by which Canadian courts have adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic with other measures designed to ensure meaningful and substantive access to justice for the long term. The Advocates’ Society believes that permanent changes to our justice system require careful research, analysis, consultation, and deliberation. “This is a pivotal moment for the Canadian justice system,” said Guy Pratte, incoming President of The Advocates’ Society. “There is no doubt that we are learning a great deal from the changes to the system brought about by necessity during this crisis. We have a unique opportunity to reflect on this experience and use it to enhance the efficiency and quality of the justice system. We must do that while preserving the fundamental right of litigants to have their cases put forward in a meaningful and direct way before courts and other decision-makers.” The Task Force is composed of members of The Advocates’ Society from across the country. They will be guided by an advisory panel of some of the most respected jurists and counsel in our country. The Task Force’s mandate is to provide insight and analysis to assist in the modernization of the justice system. It will be informed by experience, jurisprudence and Canadian societal norms. The Task Force will offer recommendations designed to ensure that the Canadian legal system provides a sustainable, accessible and transparent system of justice in which litigants and the public have confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Moot Court Program
    MOOT COURT PROGRAM 2018-2019 DESCRIPTIONS AND PRE-REQUISITES 1. ARNUP CUP 2. COMPETITION MOOT 3. DAVIES’ CANADIAN CORPORATE AND SECURITIES LAW MOOT 4. DONALD G.H. BOWMAN TAX MOOT 5. GALE CUP MOOT 6. HAROLD G. FOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW MOOT 7. JOHN H. JACKSON MOOT COURT COMPETITION (FORMERLY ELSA) 8. KAWASKIMHON NATIONAL ABORIGINAL MOOT 9. LASKIN MOOT 10. MATHEWS DINSDALE AND CLARKE LABOUR ARBITRATION MOOT 11. OTLA CUP 12. WALSH FAMILY LAW MOOT 13. WALSH FAMILY (NEGOTIATIONS) MOOT 14. WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT 15. WILLMS & SHIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAW MOOT 16. WILSON MOOT 17. PHILIP C. JESSUP INTERNATIONAL LAW MOOT THE ARNUP CUP The Arnup Cup is an annual trial advocacy competition involving two-person teams from Ontario law schools. This moot involves a judge and jury trial scenario in which each team examines and cross-examines witnesses, deals with evidentiary and procedural issues, and addresses the jury (opening and closing). The panel of jurors consists of members of the Advocates Society who act as assessors of the students. The moot problem has been a criminal one for the past several years. The competition is organized by The Advocates' Society and their sponsor WeirFoulds LLP. Top two regional teams advance to the Sopinka Cup in Ottawa. https://www.advocates.ca/TAS/Professional_Development/Moots/TAS/Professional_Develop ment/Moots.aspx?hkey=176fcbc0-6402-4c6b-8eb1-54c5745172a6 http://www.weirfoulds.com/WeirFoulds-Proud-Sponsor-Arnup-Cup-2018 Participation is made possible by sponsors WeirFoulds. Organized by the Advocates' Society Selection Process: Present a five minute oral argument before a panel of judges at the general tryouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: a 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 Canliidocs 33319 Adam M
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 67 (2014) Article 4 Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 Adam M. Dodek Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Dodek, Adam M.. "Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 67. (2014). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol67/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Reforming the Supreme Court Appointment Process, 2004-2014: A 10-Year Democratic Audit* Adam M. Dodek** 2014 CanLIIDocs 33319 The way in which Justice Rothstein was appointed marks an historic change in how we appoint judges in this country. It brought unprecedented openness and accountability to the process. The hearings allowed Canadians to get to know Justice Rothstein through their members of Parliament in a way that was not previously possible.1 — The Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper, PC [J]udicial appointments … [are] a critical part of the administration of justice in Canada … This is a legacy issue, and it will live on long after those who have the temporary stewardship of this position are no longer there.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion and Integrity Lead Gitzel to the Top CEO of Cameco Corporation, Tim Gitzel
    SPRING/SUMMER 2012 College of Law From university to uranium: passion and integrity lead Gitzel to the top CEO of Cameco Corporation, Tim Gitzel Alumni feature: Tim Gitzel Centennial 2012: See you there! Discovering gold on and off the ice 100 YEARS LAW SPRING/SUMMER 2012 Published by the College of Law at the University of Saskatchewan, of NOTE contains news and updates from the college as well as information relevant to our alumni and all of our college community. To submit information or articles for of NOTE, or to send us your latest news, whether personal or professional, please contact: EDITOR Sarah Trefiak Communications Officer College of Law University of Saskatchewan 15 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A6 Email: [email protected] PHOTOGRAPHY Cameco Corporation, www.cameco.com Josh Schaefer, U of S Huskies Sarah Trefiak, University of Saskatchewan Shannon Seymour, University of Saskatchewan Stobbe Photography, www.stobbephoto.ca table of contents Dean’s Message . 2 Centennial 2012: See you there! . 6 U of S welcomes 40th group of aboriginal law students . 8 Honorary Doctor of Laws Blaine Favel . 8 STLA Spring Conference held at college . 9 Administrative Staff Changes . 9 Success of guest speaker program continues . 10 Career Office Update . 11 College welcomes two full-time faculty members . 12 Faculty Notes . 12 CBA’s Legal Aid Leader Award . 13 Judicial Appointments . 13 Queen’s Council 2011 . 13 From university to uranium: Passion and integrity lead Gitzel to the top . 14 Alumni Notes . 15 Captain Ross: Discovering gold on and off the ice . 16 College celebrates 2012 graduates . 18 First Year Welcoming Ceremony .
    [Show full text]