Inventory of Freshwater Fish Species Within Big Cypress National Preserve: the Basis for a Long-Term Sampling Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inventory of Freshwater Fish Species Within Big Cypress National Preserve: the Basis for a Long-Term Sampling Program Inventory of Freshwater Fish Species within Big Cypress National Preserve: The Basis for a Long-Term Sampling Program Introduction habitats because fishes were concentrating, but had not yet experienced high mortality. We emphasized sampling during The Big Cypress ecosystem forms a largely undeveloped this period to record the maximum number of species living landscape in southwestern Florida. The ecosystem includes within each habitat. In addition, shallow wetlands were three major habitats: seasonally flooded marshes, forested sampled during the summer and fall high-water period. wetlands and upland pine habitats, all of which are intersected Because much of BCNP is inaccessible by road, helicopter, by manmade canals. Much of the landscape lies within the swamp buggy, and all-terrain vehicles were used to reach Federally protected Big Cypress National Preserve (BCNP), interior sites within the Preserve. which is managed by the National Park Service (fig. 1). To The diversity of habitats in BCNP presented challenges to understand this ecosystem, knowledge about the ecology of its the development of a comprehensive sampling regime. The fishes is especially important, because they are the most numer- effectiveness of any method varies by habitat, and each has ous vertebrates within the Preserve, and provide food for preda- inherent biases. To compensate, we used several techniques tors such as wading birds and alligators. The hydrologic change when taking a sample. Traps and nets provided a means of resulting from surface-water drainage and impoundment within the system has probably decreased fish biomass and numbers, Number of and altered the timing and the areas of fish availability to preda- Habitat samples tors (Duever and others, 1986). In addition, non-native fish Canals 155 species have colonized natural and disturbed habitats of the Big Cypress forest 49 Cypress ecosystem during the past three decades, because the Freshwater marsh 42 Table 1. Number of local climate and habitats are favorable for their colonization and Herbaceous prairie 33 samples per habitat type survival (Loftus and Kushlan, 1987). Sloughs/ponds/rivers 25 Only recent baseline data exist for fish communities in the Cypress prairie 15 Big Cypress system, and these data are relatively scarce. The first collections were made in the 1960s and 1970s during Mixed swamp forest 14 studies of the prey populations for wading birds (Kahl, 1964; Coastal marshes 10 Browder, 1976; Kushlan, 1974). The composition and distribu- 83° 82° 81° 80° tion of native and introduced fishes from the southern areas of ST. LUCIE SARASOTA DE SOTO HIGHLANDS the Preserve were reported on by Loftus and Kushlan (1987). EXPLANATION MARTIN 27° Big Cypress National Preserve Lake OKEECHOBEE Limited collections were made by W.F. Loftus (National Park Everglades National Park Okeechobee CHARLOTTE GLADES PALM BEACH Service, written commun., 1987), and by Dalrymple (1995). Direction of surface-water flow Road Small quantitative datasets on fish communities exist only for LEE HENDRY Canal HISTORIC Corkscrew Swamp (Carlson and Duever, 1977), and coastal S-190 Control Structure EVERGLADES habitats in the southern Big Cypress Swamp (Carter and others, COLLIER PALM BEACH COUNTY BROWARD COUNTY HENDRY COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY 1973). The present study, funded by the USGS Greater Ever- Gulf of Mexico BROWARD Naples glades Priority Ecosystems Science Program, in cooperation 26° BROWARD CO with BCNP, was conducted to produce a complete inventory of Atlantic Ocean MIAMI-DADE th MONR fishes for the Preserve, and to test methods for quantitatively e TAMIAMI CANAL Miami S-190 ve OE sampling those habitats. Le L28 Nor 75 S-140 r L28 Methods of Investigation 29 ve Interceptor Levee Road ner Ri Big Cypress fishes were inventoried throughout the period r Tu S-344 from October 2002 through June 2004 (Ellis and others, 2003). 25° Birdon Road Road L28 41 11 Mile We collected multiple samples in all major aquatic habitats in Levee Loop S-12A the Preserve. We also took samples during several seasons at Road S-343A 0 25 50 MILES many locations (table 1). Most data, however, were collected 0 10 MILES S-343B during the winter/spring dry season in canals and other deep- 0 10 KILOMETERS 0 25 50 KILOMETERS water habitats. The transition between the wet and dry seasons coincided with the time of highest species richness in many Figure 1. Map showing Big Cypress National Preserve. U.S. Department of the Interior Fact Sheet 2004-3131 U.S. Geological Survey Printed on recycled paper November 2004 sampling with a standardized unit of effort (soak time), Table 2. Distribution of fish species by habitat and were suitable for most habitats. We used Gee-type minnow traps, box traps, collapsible mesh traps, and Breder traps. Soak times were generally 24 hours, although 1-hour sets were also performed. Small-fish Species traps were fished unbaited and relied on encounter by the fish to generate captures. Hoop nets were normally Canals Sloughs, ponds, rivers Mixed swamp forest Freshwater marsh Cypress forest Cypress prairie Herbaceous prairie Coastal marshes All wetlands Freshwater wetlands Deep-water habitats fished unbaited, but were baited for 24-hour periods American eel x x - - - - - - - - x in deep-water areas to sample larger fishes. We used Atlantic needlefish x - - - - - - - - - x experimental gill nets to sample canal fishes by deploy- black acara x x x x x x x x x x - ing two nets in tandem, each with four 2.4-meter deep black crappie x - - - - - - - - - x x 1.8-meter wide panels. The first net had panels with blue tilapia x x - x x x - x x x - bar-mesh sizes of 1.2, 2.5, 3.7, and 5 centimeters, and bluefin killifish x x x x x x x x x x - the second had meshes of 6.2, 7.6, 8.8, and 11 centime- bluegill x x x x x - - x x x - ters. Nets were typically set from 1 to 4 hours. bluespotted sunfish x x x x x - x x x x - We employed two electrofishing rigs to sample bowfin x x - - x - - - x x - fishes. The first was a boat-mounted Smith-Root type brook silverside x x - x x x x - x x - 6A electrofisher with a maximum current output of brown bullhead x - - - - - - - - - x 1,008 volts dc at 120 pulses per second. It performed brown hoplo x - - - - - - - - - x well in sampling canals, but was too large for use in clown goby x - - - - - - x x - - vegetated habitats. In forested habitats and marshes, coastal shiner x - - - - - - - - - x crested goby x - - - - - - - - - x we sampled with a small barge carrying a Smith-Root crevalle jack x - - - - - - - - - x model 2.5 Gas-powered Pulsator (GPP) electrofisher dollar sunfish x x x x x x x x x x - having a maximum current of 1,000 volts dc at Everglades pygmy x x x x x - x - x x - 120 pulses per second. Samples were standardized to sunfish 300 seconds of total shock time. flagfish x x x x x x x x x x - We also maintained sight records for species Florida gar x x x x x x x - x x - observed but not captured, which we were able to frillfin goby x - - - - - - - - - x gizzard shad x - - - - - - - - - x positively identify. Extensive collections of voucher golden shiner x x x x - - - - x x - specimens were saved to document the identities of golden topminnow x x x x x x x x x x - BCNP fishes, and they are stored at the South Florida gray snapper x - - - - - - - - - x Collection Management Center repository at Everglades gulf killifish x - - - - - - x x - - National Park. hardhead catfish x - - - - - - - - - x Habitat Classification hogchoker x x - - - - - x x - - inland silverside x - - - - - - x x - - Sampling was planned using a stratified design based jewel cichlid x - - x - - x - x x - on habitat category. The habitat-classification scheme ladyfish x - - - - - - - - - x was based on the seasonally inundated habitats identi- lake chubsucker x x - - x - - - x x - fied by Duever and others (1986). Eight broad habitat largemouth bass x x x x x x x x x x - categories were used, based on dominant vegetation least killifish x x x x x x x - x x - marsh killifish x x x x x x x x x x - and hydroperiod (National Park Service, 1991); six of Mayan cichlid x x x x x x x x x x - these are subject to seasonal dry-down. The habitats are mosquitofish, eastern x x x x x x x x x x - ranked by hydroperiod from longest to shortest: oscar x x - - - - x - x x - • Cypress forest — includes bald cypresscypress Taxodium pike killifish x x x x x x x x x x - distichum and pond cypress Taxodium ascendens. pinfish x - - - - - - - - - x • Mixed swamp forest — forested wetlands domi- rainwater killifish x x - - - - - x x - - nated by hardwoods (Duever and others, 1986). red drum x - - - - - - - - - x redear x x x x x x - x x x - • Freshwater marshes — wetlands dominated by a redfin needlefish x - - - - - - - - - x variety of grasses and sedges. redfin pickerel - - - - x - - - x x - • Coastal marshes — herbaceous wetlands that sea- sailfin molly x x x x x x x x x x - sonally vary between fresh and brackish salinities Seminole killifish x x - x - - - - x x - sharksucker x - - - - - - - - - x (National Park Service, 1991). sheepshead x - - - - - - - - - x • Cypress prairie — wetland with an open canopy of sheepshead minnow x - - x - - x x x x - sparse dwarf pond cypress (National Park Service, snook x x - - - - - - - - x 1991). spotted sunfish x x x x x x x - x x - • Herbaceous prairie — short-hydroperiod wetlands spotted tilapia x x x x x x x x x x - characterized by a variety of grasses (Duever and striped mojarra x x - - - - - - - - x others, 1986).
Recommended publications
  • Saltmarsh Topminnow Petition FINAL
    PETITION TO LIST THE SALTMARSH TOPMINNOW (Fundulus jenkinsi) UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Photo: © Gretchen L. Grammer Photo: NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service Petition Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Acting Through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service & the U.S. Secretary of Interior, Acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Petitioners: WildEarth Guardians 312 Montezuma Ave. Santa Fe, NM 87501 (505) 988-9126 Sarah Felsen 4545 E. 29th Ave. Denver, CO 80207 (510) 847-7451 Submitted on: September 3, 2010 PETITION PREPARED BY SARAH FELSEN WildEarth Guardians & Sarah Felsen 1 Petition to List the Saltmarsh Topminnow Under the ESA I. INTRODUCTION WildEarth Guardians and Sarah Felsen hereby petition the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), and the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), to list and thereby protect under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”),1 the Saltmarsh Topminnow, Fundulus jenkinsi (Evermann, 1892) (hereinafter “Saltmarsh Topminnow” or “Topminnow”).2 Concurrent with its listing, Petitioner seeks the designation of critical habitat for this species throughout its range. The Saltmarsh Topminnow occurs sporadically in fragile marsh habitat along the U.S. coast of the Gulf of Mexico, from Galveston, Texas to Escambia Bay, Florida (Peterson et al. 2003). Specialists in marine science have long considered this fish to be extremely rare. It either occurs in very small populations or is simply absent from the reports of most fish studies of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishtraits: a Database on Ecological and Life-History Traits of Freshwater
    FishTraits database Traits References Allen, D. M., W. S. Johnson, and V. Ogburn-Matthews. 1995. Trophic relationships and seasonal utilization of saltmarsh creeks by zooplanktivorous fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42(1)37-50. [multiple species] Anderson, K. A., P. M. Rosenblum, and B. G. Whiteside. 1998. Controlled spawning of Longnose darters. The Progressive Fish-Culturist 60:137-145. [678] Barber, W. E., D. C. Williams, and W. L. Minckley. 1970. Biology of the Gila Spikedace, Meda fulgida, in Arizona. Copeia 1970(1):9-18. [485] Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. Belk, M. C., J. B. Johnson, K. W. Wilson, M. E. Smith, and D. D. Houston. 2005. Variation in intrinsic individual growth rate among populations of leatherside chub (Snyderichthys copei Jordan & Gilbert): adaptation to temperature or length of growing season? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 14:177-184. [349] Bonner, T. H., J. M. Watson, and C. S. Williams. 2006. Threatened fishes of the world: Cyprinella proserpina Girard, 1857 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes. In Press. [133] Bonnevier, K., K. Lindstrom, and C. St. Mary. 2003. Parental care and mate attraction in the Florida flagfish, Jordanella floridae. Behavorial Ecology and Sociobiology 53:358-363. [410] Bortone, S. A. 1989. Notropis melanostomus, a new speices of Cyprinid fish from the Blackwater-Yellow River drainage of northwest Florida. Copeia 1989(3):737-741. [575] Boschung, H.T., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington. [multiple species] 1 FishTraits database Breder, C. M., and D. E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Lemon Bay Estuary and a Comparison of Fish Community Structure to Nearby Estuaries Along Florida’S Gulf Coast
    Biological Sciences Fishes of the Lemon Bay estuary and a comparison of fish community structure to nearby estuaries along Florida’s Gulf coast Charles F. Idelberger(1), Philip W. Stevens(2), and Eric Weather(2) (1)Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Charlotte Harbor Field Laboratory, 585 Prineville Street, Port Charlotte, Florida 33954 (2)Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast, Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701 Abstract Lemon Bay is a narrow, shallow estuary in southwest Florida. Although its fish fauna has been studied intermittently since the 1880s, no detailed inventory has been available. We sampled fish and selected macroinvertebrates in the bay and lower portions of its tributaries from June 2009 through April 2010 using seines and trawls. One hundred three fish and six invertebrate taxa were collected. Pinfish Lagodon rhomboides, spot Leiostomus xanthurus, bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli, mojarras Eucinostomus spp., silver perch Bairdiella chrysoura, and scaled sardine Harengula jaguana were among the most abundant species. To place our information into a broader ecological context, we compared the Lemon Bay fish assemblages with those of nearby estuaries. Multivariate analyses revealed that fish assemblages of Lemon and Sarasota bays differed from those of lower Charlotte Harbor and lower Tampa Bay at similarities of 68–75%, depending on collection gear. These differences were attributed to greater abundances of small-bodied fishes in Lemon and Sarasota bays than in the other much larger estuaries. Factors such as water circulation patterns, length of shoreline relative to area of open water, and proximity of Gulf passes to juvenile habitat may differ sufficiently between the small and large estuaries to affect fish assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • THROWTRAP FISH ID GUIDE.V5 Loftusedits
    Fish Identification Guide For Throw trap Samples Florida International University Aquatic Ecology Lab April 2007 Prepared by Tish Robertson, Brooke Sargeant, and Raúl Urgellés Table of Contents Basic fish morphology diagrams………………………………………..3 Fish species by family…………………………………………………...4-31 Gar…..………………………………………………………….... 4 Bowfin………….………………………………..………………...4 Tarpon…...……………………………………………………….. 5 American Eel…………………..………………………………….5 Bay Anchovy…..……..…………………………………………...6 Pickerels...………………………………………………………...6-7 Shiners and Minnows…………………………...……………….7-9 Bullhead Catfishes……..………………………………………...9-10 Madtom Catfish…………………………………………………..10 Airbreathing Catfish …………………………………………….11 Brown Hoplo…...………………………………………………….11 Orinoco Sailfin Catfish……………………………..……………12 Pirate Perch…….………………………………………………...12 Topminnows ……………….……………………….……………13-16 Livebearers……………….……………………………….…….. 17-18 Pupfishes…………………………………………………………19-20 Silversides..………………………………………………..……..20-21 Snook……………………………………………………………...21 Sunfishes and Basses……………….……………………....….22-25 Swamp Darter…………………………………………………….26 Mojarra……...…………………………………………………….26 Everglades pygmy sunfish……………………………………...27 Cichlids………………………….….………………………….....28-30 American Soles…………………………………………………..31 Key to juvenile sunfish..………………………………………………...32 Key to cichlids………....………………………………………………...33-38 Note for Reader/References…………………………………………...39 2 Basic Fish Morphology Diagrams Figures from Page and Burr (1991). 3 FAMILY: Lepisosteidae (gars) SPECIES: Lepisosteus platyrhincus COMMON NAME: Florida gar ENP CODE: 17 GENUS-SPECIES
    [Show full text]
  • Killifish Recovery Plan)
    Recovery Plan for the killifishes of Bermuda (Fundulus bermudae & Fundulus relictus) Government of Bermuda Ministry of Home Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources Recovery Plan for the killifishes of Bermuda (Fundulus bermudae & Fundulus relictus) Prepared in Accordance with the Bermuda Protected Species Act 2003 Author This plan was prepared by: Mark Outerbridge Ph.D. Senior Biodiversity Officer Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecology Section 17 North Shore Road, Hamilton FL 04 Bermuda Contact email: [email protected] Cover photo: male and female Fundulus relictus in Bartram’s Pond Photo credit: Philippe Rouja The aerial photographs in the appendix came from the Bermuda Planning Map Viewer https://bdagov.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=bc5f33868b724838a4e9c875c 24d836f All other photographs in this plan were taken by Mark Outerbridge Maps were created by Mark Outerbridge except where stated otherwise Published by Government of Bermuda Ministry of Home Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources “To conserve and restore Bermuda’s natural heritage” CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 DISCLAIMER ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana
    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 61 2021 Article 3 March 2021 Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Michael H. Doosey University of New Orelans, [email protected] Henry L. Bart Jr. Tulane University, [email protected] Kyle R. Piller Southeastern Louisiana Univeristy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biodiversity Commons Recommended Citation Doosey, Michael H.; Bart, Henry L. Jr.; and Piller, Kyle R. (2021) "Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 61. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss61/3 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. Checklist of the Inland Fishes of Louisiana Abstract Since the publication of Freshwater Fishes of Louisiana (Douglas, 1974) and a revised checklist (Douglas and Jordan, 2002), much has changed regarding knowledge of inland fishes in the state. An updated reference on Louisiana’s inland and coastal fishes is long overdue. Inland waters of Louisiana are home to at least 224 species (165 primarily freshwater, 28 primarily marine, and 31 euryhaline or diadromous) in 45 families. This checklist is based on a compilation of fish collections records in Louisiana from 19 data providers in the Fishnet2 network (www.fishnet2.net).
    [Show full text]
  • RECOVERY PLAN for KILLIFISH in BERMUDA (Fundulus Bermudae, Fundulus Relictus)
    RECOVERY PLAN FOR KILLIFISH IN BERMUDA (Fundulus bermudae, Fundulus relictus) GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Public Works Department of Conservation Services RECOVERY PLAN FOR KILLIFISH IN BERMUDA (Fundulus bermudae, Fundulus relictus) Prepared in Accordance with the Bermuda Protected Species Act 2003 Funded in part by: Primary Authors This recovery plan was prepared by: Mark Outerbridge1 and Samia Sarkis2 1Bermuda Zoological Society Bermuda 2Protected Species Coordinator Department of Conservation Services, 17 North Shore Road, Hamilton FL04 Bermuda Contact: Samia Sarkis, [email protected] Cover Photos were taken by Mark Outerbridge and Jennifer Gray All other photos in the document by Mark Outerbridge Maps were prepared by Mark Outerbridge Published by GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Public Works Department of Conservation Services To conserve and restore Bermuda’s natural heritage CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................i LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................i DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 PART I: INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Fundulus Diaphanus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Banded Killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, December 2016 Revised, November 2017 Web version, 8/16/2018 Photo: hjnugent(iNaturalist). Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0. Available: http://eol.org/data_objects/33497673. (November 1, 2017). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Fuller and Neilson (2016): “Atlantic Slope drainages from Newfoundland to Pee Dee River, South Carolina; St. Lawrence- Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins from Quebec to Manitoba, and south to southern Pennsylvania, northern Illinois, and northeastern Nebraska. Two subspecies with intergrades in 1 St. Lawrence and Lake Erie drainages: F[undulus]. d[iaphanus]. diaphanus on the Atlantic Slope, F. d. menona in the rest of the range (Page and Burr 1991).” From NatureServe (2013): “Range includes Atlantic Slope drainages from the Peedee River, South Carolina, north to the Maritime Provinces and Newfoundland; St. Lawrence-Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins from Quebec to Manitoba, south to southern Pennsylvania, northern Illinois, and northeastern Nebraska (Page and Burr 2011).” Status in the United States The native range of this species is within the United States (Fuller and Neilson 2016). From Fuller and Neilson (2016): “The species is established in Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge, Franklin County, Massachussetts [sic] (USFWS 2005). The eastern subspecies F. d. diaphanus was introduced into Lake Erie, the Little Miami drainage, and several areas in the upper Ohio River basin in Ohio, and into the Ohio and Beaver River drainages (Raney 1938, cited in Trautman 1981), the Monongahela drainage (Hocutt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Topminnow (Family Fundulidae) Diversity in North Carolina The
    Topminnow (Family Fundulidae) Diversity in North Carolina The Topminnow Family in North Carolina is a small family of 11 scientifically described and 1 undescribed species (Table 1) occurring primarily within the eastern Coastal Plain and within the estuarine marshes along the Atlantic Coast (Menhinick 1991; Tracy et al. 2020). Often referred to as killifishes, top minnows, or mud-minnows, each species has an American Fisheries Society-accepted common name (Page et al. 2013) and a scientific (Latin) name (Table 1; Appendix 1). Table 1. Species of topminnows found in North Carolina. Common name enclosed within tick marks (“) is a scientifically undescribed species. Scientific Name/ Scientific Name/ American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name Golden Topminnow, Fundulus chrysotus Striped Killifish, Fundulus majalis Marsh Killifish, Fundulus confluentus Speckled Killifish, Fundulus rathbuni Banded Killifish, Fundulus diaphanus Waccamaw Killifish, Fundulus waccamensis Mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus Fundulus sp. “Lake Phelps” Killifish Lined Topminnow, Fundulus lineolatus Bluefin Killifish, Lucania goodei Spotfin Killifish, Fundulus luciae Rainwater Killifish, Lucania parva Topminnows range in size from the diminutive Lucania at 50 mm (about 2 inches) to the 200 mm (7.8 inches) Striped Killifish. Because of their abundance and the ease by which they can be collected, they are often sold and used as bait fish along the Coast. As previously stated, most species are found in the eastern part of the state, although one species, Speckled Killifish, is found in the central Piedmont. There are no species in our river basins west of the Appalachian Mountains. Most of our species inhabit a variety of coastal aquatic environments (Table 2) and have a wide-ranging tolerance to salinities.
    [Show full text]
  • Helminth Parasites of the Blackspotted Topminnow, Fundulus Olivaceus (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae), from the Interior Highlands of Arkansas C
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 69 Article 26 2015 Helminth Parasites of the Blackspotted Topminnow, Fundulus olivaceus (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae), from the Interior Highlands of Arkansas C. T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College, [email protected] C. R. Bursey Pennsylvania State University T. J. Fayton University of Southern Mississippi W. F. Font Southeastern Louisiana University H. W. Robison See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation McAllister, C. T.; Bursey, C. R.; Fayton, T. J.; Font, W. F.; Robison, H. W.; Connior, M. B.; and Cloutman, D. G. (2015) "Helminth Parasites of the Blackspotted Topminnow, Fundulus olivaceus (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae), from the Interior Highlands of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 69 , Article 26. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol69/iss1/26 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Helminth Parasites of the Blackspotted Topminnow, Fundulus olivaceus (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae), from the Interior Highlands of Arkansas Authors C.
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Killifish Fundulus Diaphanous
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Banded Killifish Fundulus diaphanous Contributor (2005): Miller White and Jason Bettinger [SCDNR] Reviewed and Edited (2013): Mark Scott, Andrew R. Gelder, and M. Troy Cribb [SCDNR] DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description The Banded Killifish is a member of the large genus Fundulus, in the family Fundulidae (topminnows). Two subspecies are recognized, F. d. diaphanus and F. d. menona. The Banded Killifish reaches a length of 130 mm (5.1 in.). The fundulids are commonly used as bait (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994) and are important for mosquito control (Rosen 1973). Hobbyists also keep many members of the family in aquaria. The Banded Killifish is distinguished from others in the genus by a more elongate body, longer and more flattened snout, small scales and numerous narrow bars. Bars are darker than the background color in females and silvery in males (Rohde 1994 et al.). Status The Banded Killifish has received legal status as a fish of concern in South Carolina. It is considered secure or apparently secure (G5) throughout most of its global range (NatureServe 2013). It is classified as critically imperiled (S1) in locations on the fringes of its range, including South Carolina, Illinois, South Dakota, Manitoba and Newfoundland (NatureServe 2013). POPULATION SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION The Banded Killifish is widely distributed in Atlantic Slope drainages from the Pee Dee River in South Carolina, north to the Maritime Provinces and Newfoundland; St. Lawrence, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River Basins from Quebec to Manitoba; and south to Southern Pennsylvania, Northern Illinois, and Northeastern Nebraska (Page and Burr 1991).
    [Show full text]