List of Michigan Local Telecommunications Service
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Local Network Competition
Chapter 15 LOCAL NETWORK COMPETITION Glenn A Woroch* University of California, Berkeley Contents 1. Introduction 1.1.Scope and objectives 1.2.Patterns and themes 2. Local Network Competition in Historical Perspective 2.1.Local competition in one city, a century apart 2.2.U.S. experience with local competition and monopoly 2.3.The experience abroad 3. Economic Conditions of Local Network Competition 3.1.Defining local services and markets 3.2.Demand for local network services 3.3.Cost of local service and technical change 4. The Structure and Regulation of the Local Network Industry 4.1.Structure of the U.S. local exchange industry 4.2.Regulation of local network competition 5. Strategic Modelling of Local Network Competition 5.1.Causes and consequences of local network competition 5.2.Strategic choices of local network entrants 5.3.Strategic models of local network competition 5.4.Entry barriers 6. Empirical Evidence on Local Network Competition 7. Wireless Local Competition 7.1.Wireless communications technologies 7.2.Wireless services as wireline competitors 7.3.Structure of the wireless industry 7.4.An assessment of the wireless threat 8. The Future of Local Competition References * I have received helpful comments on earlier drafts from Mark Armstrong, Bob Crandall, David Gabel and Lester Taylor. Ellen Burton of the FCC and Amy Friedlander of CNRI supplied useful empirical and historical information. I am especially grateful to Ingo Vogelsang for his encouragement, guidance, and inexhaustible patience throughout this project. I. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Scope and Objectives of this Chapter This chapter surveys the economic analysis of competition in markets for local telecommunications services.1 Its main objective is to understand patterns of competition in these markets and evaluate its benefits and costs against the alternative forms of industrial organisation. -
Before the Public Service Commission of The
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI In the Matter of YMax Communications ) Corp.’s Tariff Filing to Revise its Intrastate ) Case No. ____________________ Switched Access Services Tariff, ) P.S.C. MO. Tariff No. 2 ) THE AT&T COMPANIES' MOTION TO SUSPEND AND INVESTIGATE TARIFF The AT&T Companies1 respectfully request that the Missouri Public Service Commission (“Commission”) suspend and investigate2 proposed tariff revisions filed by YMax Communications Corp. (“YMax”) to revise its Intrastate Switched Access Services Tariff, P.S.C. MO. Tariff No. 2. In sum, the revisions are unlawful because they violate the rules and orders of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and are otherwise unjust and unreasonable. The Commission should suspend the YMax access tariff revisions immediately, conduct investigative proceedings, and reject the tariff’s unlawful provisions concerning switched access charges. In support of this Motion, the AT&T Companies state as follows: 1. Background on Movants. AT&T Communications is a Delaware corporation, duly authorized to conduct business in Missouri with its principal Missouri office located at 2121 East 63rd Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64130. AT&T Communications is an “interexchange telecommunications company,” an “alternative local exchange telecommunications company,” and a “public utility,” and is duly authorized to provide “telecommunications service” within the State of Missouri as each of those phrases is defined in Section 386.020 RSMo. 1 AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. will be referred to as “AT&T Communications” and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Missouri will be referred to as "AT&T Missouri." Collectively, they will be referred to as “the AT&T Companies." 2 The AT&T Companies make this filing pursuant to 4 CSR 240-2.065(3) and 4 CSR 240-2.075(2). -
Consumer Complaints with Tds in Southern Utah
Consumer Complaints With Tds In Southern Utah Sometimes bilobed Randal fetches her singer complexly, but conchological Dana hummed unbeknown or niggardises assumingly. Somnifacient Tann sometimes chill his quoter longest and robbing so shadily! Platyrrhinian Fyodor sometimes barbequed his coevals worthlessly and strap so extensionally! Are that first year, with tds in complaints before the united states, maps clearly illustrate that enables researchers, government and legacy delivery Joe Biden to three oil because gas sales on public lands News. Led by several young South Carolina football stars a new Changeorg petition is calling for sample school's Strom Thurmond Wellness and Fitness Center cannot be. The taking where I lived in the mountains of southern Utah comes from a. Headquartered in complaints are encouraged to give way to legal entity, outside needed buried underground utilities, consumer complaints with tds in southern utah state that first step is done. Login Wages circular of security guards TDS Certificate 201-19 English. TDS Internet and TV Check Availability Plans & Pricing. According to reviews from TMZ a driver obtained a dedicate to choose up DaBaby in. Gbps internet services of any network environment is one confirmed as well as a consumer complaints. Southern Utah scores 4 TDs in 1st quarter eases by Idaho. Arizona Know Your mantle A Consumer's Guide for Water. From financial reports to employee records confidential information in through wrong. The third couple of years it's cover a tough league Southern Miss coach. Operations in need for thousands of consumer complaints. We offer special outdoor experiences to ensure that scoured by each community or federal lands to be sure to human exposure creaces a source, consumer complaints with tds in southern utah. -
Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc
Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc. 102 South Tejon Street, 11th Floor Colorado Springs, CO 80903. Telecommunications Service Guide For Interstate and International Services May 2016 This Service Guide contains the descriptions, regulations, and rates applicable to furnishing of domestic Interstate and International Long Distance Telecommunications Services provided by Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc. (“Central Telecom Long Distance” or “Company”). This Service Guide and is available to Customers and the public in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Public Availability of Information Concerning Interexchange Services rules, 47 CFR Section 42.10. Additional information is available by contacting Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc.’s Customer Service Department toll free at 888.988.9818, or in writing directed to Customer Service, 102 South Tejon Street, 11th Floor, Colorado Springs, CO 80903. 1 INTRODUCTION This Service Guide contains the rates, terms, and conditions applicable to the provision of domestic Interstate and International Long Distance Services. This Service Guide is prepared in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission’s Public Availability of Information Concerning Interexchange Services rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 42.10 and Service Agreement and may be changed and/or discontinued by the Company. This Service Guide governs the relationship between Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc. and its Interstate and International Long Distance Service Customers, pursuant to applicable federal regulation, federal and state law, and any client-specific arrangements. In the event one or more of the provisions contained in this Service Guide shall, for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Service Guide shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. -
In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Case 1:11-cv-00341-LPS Document 1 Filed 04/15/11 Page 1 of 39 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED ACCESS § TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § CIVIL ACTION NO. ___________ v. § § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS § CORP., § CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES § COMPANY L.L.C., § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF IDAHO, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, LLC, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF MONTANA, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF NEBRASKA, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF NEVADA, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF OREGON, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF TENNESSEE, L.L.C., § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF THE VOLUNTEER § STATE LLC, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF THE WHITE § MOUNTAINS, INC., § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF UTAH, § CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS § COMPANY OF WEST VIRGINIA, § CITIZENS UTILITIES RURAL § COMPLAINT PAGE 1 Case 1:11-cv-00341-LPS Document 1 Filed 04/15/11 Page 2 of 39 PageID #: 2 COMPANY, INC., § COMMONWEALTH § COMMUNICATION, LLC, § COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE § COMPANY LLC, § COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE § ENTERPRISES LLC, § COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE § ENTERPRISES, LLC, § CTSI, LLC, § FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS – § MIDLAND, INC., § FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS – § PRAIRIE, INC., § FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS – -
Turn Your Phone Into a Free-Call Powerhouse 4 June 2014
Turn your phone into a free-call powerhouse 4 June 2014 Today, let's switch on airplane mode and tune out smartphone or mobile device. our wireless carriers, their out-there monthly charges and long-term contractual obligations. Information: Don't bother visiting magicjack.com. Go straight to Google Play or the iTunes Store. The next call you make is free, with a Wi-Fi connection, maybe even to the other side of the FreedomPop. Peel away the free mobile-service globe. offers FreedomPop packages with refurbished smartphones, and you'll find a free app with voice It's a glorious day with Voice over Internet and text for Android and, now, iPhone/iPad/iPod Protocol, or VoIP, the technology that digitizes Touch. This freebie includes 200 voice minutes, analog signals (like your voice) and sends them 500 texts and 500 MBs of data each month. over the Internet. While FreedomPop portrays itself as a disruptive Someday, VoIP and the growing number of public mobile service upending the industry, it has Wi-Fi hotspots could reshape the wireless industry. disrupted some consumers with hidden costs as If you have landline service from your cable well. provider, it's a version of VoIP. The company no longer buries a 99-cent "Active For now, these apps turn a mobile device, Status" fee charged to new subscribers of its free Android or Apple, into a powerhouse that churns broadband service who use less than 5 MB in a out free calls, or close. month, but it still automatically adds $10 to tapped- out accounts. -
Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers
Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers November 1997 Jim Lande Katie Rangos Industry Analysis Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 This report is available for reference in the Common Carrier Bureau's Public Reference Room, 2000 M Street, N.W. Washington DC, Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file name LOCAT-97.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link computer bulletin board system at (202) 418-0241. Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers Contents Introduction 1 Table 1: Number of Carriers Filing 1997 TRS Fund Worksheets 7 by Type of Carrier and Type of Revenue Table 2: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 9 Carriers that filed a 1997 TRS Fund Worksheet or a September 1997 Universal Service Worksheet, with address and customer contact number Table 3: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 65 Listing of carriers sorted by carrier type, showing types of revenue reported for 1996 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) and 65 Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Cellular and Personal Communications Services (PCS) 68 Carriers Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 83 Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) 86 Paging and Other Mobile Service Carriers 111 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 118 Other Toll Service Providers 119 Pay Telephone Providers 120 Pre-paid Calling Card Providers 129 Toll Resellers 130 Table 4: Carriers that are not expected to file in the 137 future using the same TRS ID because of merger, reorganization, name change, or leaving the business Table 5: Carriers that filed a 1995 or 1996 TRS Fund worksheet 141 and that are unaccounted for in 1997 i Introduction This report lists 3,832 companies that provided interstate telecommunications service as of June 30, 1997. -
Telecommunications Infrastructure for Electronic Delivery 3
Telecommunications Infrastructure for Electronic Delivery 3 SUMMARY The telecommunications infrastructure is vitally important to electronic delivery of Federal services because most of these services must, at some point, traverse the infrastructure. This infrastructure includes, among other components, the Federal Government’s long-distance telecommunications program (known as FTS2000 and operated under contract with commercial vendors), and computer networks such as the Internet. The tele- communications infrastructure can facilitate or inhibit many op- portunities in electronic service delivery. The role of the telecommunications infrastructure in electronic service delivery has not been defined, however. OTA identified four areas that warrant attention in clarifying the role of telecommunications. First, Congress and the administration could review and update the mission of FTS2000 and its follow-on contract in the context of electronic service delivery. The overall perform- ance of FTS2000 shows significant improvement over the pre- vious system, at least for basic telephone service. FTS2000 warrants continual review and monitoring, however, to assure that it is the best program to manage Federal telecommunications into the next century when electronic delivery of Federal services likely will be commonplace. Further studies and experiments are needed to properly evaluate the benefits and costs of FTS2000 follow-on options from the perspective of different sized agencies (small to large), diverse Federal programs and recipients, and the government as a whole. Planning for the follow-on contract to FTS2000 could consider new or revised contracting arrangements that were not feasible when FTS2000 was conceived. An “overlapping vendor” ap- proach to contracting, as one example, may provide a “win-win” 57 58 I Making Government Work situation for all parties and eliminate future de- national infrastructure will be much stronger if bates about mandatory use and service upgrades. -
Clecs Licensed in Michigan
Licensed and Competitive Local Exchange Carriers as of September 16, 2021 For corrections to the list, please contact Wendy Thelen at: [email protected] ATT Michigan - fka SBC Michigan, Ameritech Michigan. Frontier North Inc. fka Verizon North GTE North. Frontier Midstates Inc. fka Contel of the South, Inc dba Verizon North Systems, GTE North Systems Company Name Case No. App Type Order Date Decision Interconnection Tariff @link Networks, Inc. U-11758 Surrender 1/22/2002 Accepted AT&T MI/Frontier fka Geographic Area/Incumbent Territory where licensed: Surrendered Verizon agreements no Application longer in effect ATT MI Frontier North Frontier Midstates CenturyTel Other: Additional License Info: Initial application filed 8/11/98, order approving appl issued 11/05/98. 123.Net, Inc. dba Local Exchange U-11877 Initial 4/23/1999 Approved AT&T MI, Frontier fka Carriers of Michigan, Inc. Application Verizon Geographic Area/Incumbent Territory where licensed: ATT MI Frontier North Frontier Midstates CenturyTel Other: All zones of the Grand Rapids district exchange served by SBC Ameritech Additional License Info: 123.Net, Inc. dba Local Exchange U-12916 1st Expansion 7/11/2001 Approved AT&T MI, Frontier fka Carriers of Michigan, Inc. Verizon Geographic Area/Incumbent Territory where licensed: ATT MI Frontier North Frontier Midstates CenturyTel Other: Additional License Info: 1-800-Reconex, Inc., dba USTel U-11700 Amendment 12/21/1998 Revoked AT&T MI, CenturyTel, Geographic Area/Incumbent Territory where licensed: Frontier fka Verizon ATT MI -
Introductory Concepts
www.getmyuni.com INTRODUCTORY CONCEPTS 1.1 WHAT IS TELECOMMUNICATION? Many people call telecommunication the world’s must lucrative industry. In the United States, 110 million households have telephones and 50% of total households in the U.S. have Internet access and there are some 170 million mobile subscribers. Long-distance service annual revenues as of 2004 exceeded 100 × 109 dollars.1 Prior to divestiture (1983), the Bell System was the largest commercial company in the United States. It had the biggest fleet of vehicles, the most employees, and the greatest income. Every retiree with any sense held the safe and dependable Bell stock. Bell System could not be found on the “Fortune 500” listing of the largest companies. In 1982, Western Electric Co., the Bell System manufacturing arm, was number seven on the “Fortune 500.” However, if one checked the “Fortune 100 Utilities,” the Bell System was up on the top. Transferring this information to the “Fortune 500” put Bell System as the leader on the list. We know it is big business; but what is telecommunications? Webster’s (Ref. 1) calls it communications at a distance.TheIEEE Standard Dictionary (Ref. 2) defines telecom- munications as the transmission of signals over long distance, such as by telegraph, radio, or television. Another term we often hear is electrical communication. This is a descriptive term, but of somewhat broader scope. Some take the view that telecommunication deals only with voice telephony, and the typical provider of this service is the local telephone company. We hold a wider interpretation. Telecommunication encompasses the electrical communication at a distance of voice, data, and image information (e.g., TV and facsimile). -
September 16, 2019 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Federal Communications
1300 I Street, N.W. Jennifer Pelzman Suite 500 East Manager, Legal Services Washington, DC 20005 Federal Regulatory and Legal Affairs 202.515.2463 [email protected] September 16, 2019 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street S.W. Washington, DC 20554 Re: Verizon Public Notice of Network Change(s), 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325 - 51.335 Copper Retirement ID No. 2019-03-A-DE Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Sections 51.325 – 51.335 of the Commission’s rules, Verizon hereby submits the attached: Certification of Public Notice of Network Change under rule 51.329(a); Public Notice of Copper Retirement under rule 51.333; and Certification of Public Notice of Copper Retirement under rule 51.333. Specifically, Verizon is providing notification of the replacement of copper distribution and loop facilities with fiber-to-the-premises facilities at all remaining locations in the Angola, Bridgeville, Camden, Dover, Hockessin, Holly Oak, Lewes, Middletown, Marshallton, New Castle, Ocean View, Smyrna, Talleyville, Penn Rose, Wilmington and Wrangle Hill, DE wire centers. Upon completion, Verizon will provide services available over its fiber optic network. The majority of customers served by copper at these locations purchase “plain old telephone service.” Following transition to fiber, Verizon will continue to offer these customers the same POTS over fiber at the same price as they received on copper facilities, with no change in the underlying features and functionalities in their service. There may be one or more obsolete, narrowband services (such as certain DS0 level services) that are incompatible with or unavailable over fiber. -
Long Distance Telephone Providers
LONG DISTANCE PROVIDERS Company Complaints to: 800 Response Information Services LLC Stephanie Perrotte, Tariff Director 1795 Williston Road, Suite 200 Burlington VT 05403 (802) 860-0378, (802) 860-0395 fax Access One, Inc. Mark A. Jozwiak, Vice President 820 W Jackson Blvd #650 Chicago IL 60607-3026 (312) 441-1000, (312) 441-1010 fax AccessLine Communications Corporation dba Voice Telco Services 825 E. Middlefield Rd. Mountain View, CA 94043 (650) 641-4000 ACN Communication Services, LLC fka ACN Communication 877-226-1010 Services, Inc. Delores Fafinski, Manager Customer Service Jeremy Smuckler, General Counsel, North America 1000 Progress Place Concord, NC 28025 Telephone: (704) 260-3000 Fax: (704) 260-3625 www.acninc.com Affinity Network, Inc. d/b/a QuantumLink Communications d/b/a Jessica Renneker HorizonOne Communications Director of Regulatory Affairs Jessica Renneker 250 Pilot Road, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Director of Regulatory Affairs NV 89119 250 Pilot Road, Suite 300 Phone: 702-547-8486 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Fax: 702-942-5055 Phone: 702-547-8486 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 702-942-5055 E-mail: [email protected] Airespring, Inc. Avi Lonstein, President 7800 Woodley Ave Van Nuys CA 91406 (818) 786-8990; (818) 786-9225 fax 1 LONG DISTANCE PROVIDERS Company Complaints to: Airus, Inc. fka IntelePeer, Inc. 840 S. Canal Street, 7th Floor Chicago, IL 60607 (312) 878-4160 (Tel) www.airustel.com Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. Ross Petrik, General Manager PO Box 349 Garretson, SD 57030 605-594-3411; 605-594-6776 fax www.alliancecom.net Alliance Global Networks, LLC 1221 Post Rd. E.