Contributors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contributors Contributors Harry Bliss received his A.B. from Princeton University in 1941, and an M.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1944. He then held teaching positions in med- icine at the University of Illinois, Tufts University, and the University of Vermont while publishing 20 articles in the medical literature. He also practised medi- cine privately, receiving the President’s Award of the Maine Medical Associa- tion for Distinguished Service and the Laureate Award of the Maine Chapter of the American College of Physicians. In 1987 he took an M.A. in Political Sci- ence at Columbia University, and subsequently became a post-doctoral fellow in the Political Science Department at Yale University, where he initiated and completed this project. He is also author (with Bruce Russett) of an article in the November 1998 issue of the Journal of Politics. Johan De Vree studied ‘General Political and Social Sciences’ at the University of Amsterdam (1960-1967) while serving as an Artillery Officer in the Dutch Army. In 1972 he received his doctorate in Social Science with the dissertation ‘Political Integration: The Formation of Theory and its Problems’ (Mouton, The Hague-Paris, 1972). In 1973 he was appointed Professor of International Rela- tions at Utrecht State University. Since then he has specialised in Mathematical Social Theory. His main publications to date are Foundations of Social and Political Processes (Bilthoven, Prime Press, 1982, 1984) and Order and Disor- ders in the Human Universe: The Foundation of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 3 vols. (Bilthoven, Prime Press, 1990). Gustaaf Geeraerts, b. 1950, received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the Free University of Brussels (VUB). He is currently Associate Professor of Interna- tional Relations, director of the Centre for Peace and Security Studies, and Chairman of the Department of Political Science at the same university. Besides that he teaches International Relations Theory at the Brussels School of Interna- tional Studies (University of Kent), the University of Antwerp, and since 1997, as a Visiting Professor, at Nankai University (Tianjin, P.R. China). From 1986 to 199 Contributors 1990 he worked as a Senior Research Fellow at the State University at Utrecht where he specialised in fundamental research on the dynamics of international political processes. During that period he was also a member of the Board of Lecturers of the Centre for Advanced Research in International Affairs in the Netherlands (CARIAN). His present research interests centre on international rela- tions theory (especially the application of chaos theory in IR), security in Europe and East Asia, and the international relations of Internet. In 1977 he edited the volume Possibilities of Civilian Defence in Western Europe (Amsterdam, Swets & Zeitlinger). His more recent publications in English include ‘Basic Research on War: Theoretical Need and Practical Relevance’, in Bulletin of Peace Pro- posals (1991), ‘Progress and its Problems in the Study of War’, in Res Publica (1991); ‘War, Hypercomplexity, and Computer Simulation’, in Systems Research (1994), (with Anthony Antoine), ‘IT & IS: Identifying the Needs of International Organisations: The Idea of a ‘virtual’ Partnership’, in Pericles Gas- parini-Alves (ed.), Increasing Access to Information Technology for Internation- al Security (New York, United Nations Publications, 1998) and ‘Non-linearity, Chaos and the Prediction of War’, in Global Society (forthcoming). He is at present editing a volume Modelling Complex Phenomena in International Rela- tions. Joseph M. Grieco (Ph.D., Cornell) is Professor of Political Science at Duke Uni- versity. He is the author of Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade, and Between Dependency and Autonomy: India’s Experience with the International Computer Industry. Articles and notes by him have appeared in Security Studies, Review of International Studies, the Ameri- can Political Science Review, International Organization, the Journal of Poli- tics, and World Politics. His teaching interests include theories of international relations and issues of international political economy. During 1978-1979 he was a Pre-Doctoral Fellow at the Center for International Studies at Princeton University; during 1981-1982 he was a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Harvard Business School; during 1985-1986 he was a German Marshall and a Paul Hen- ri Spaak Post-Doctoral Fellow at the Center for International Affairs at Harvard University; and during 1990-1991 he served with the Office of the United States Trade Representative and the International Monetary Fund as an Interna- tional Affairs Fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations. During the summer of 1994 he was the Karl W. Deutsch Visiting Professor at the Wissenschaftszen- trum Berlin, and in May 1996, 1997, and 1998 he was a Visiting Professor at the Post-Graduate School of Economics and International Relations at the Catholic University of Milan. At present he is conducting research, with support from the National Science Foundation, on the domestic and systemic sources of repeti- tive military challenges in the international system between 1918 and 1994. 200 Contributors James D. Morrow, b. 1957, received his Ph.D. from the University of Rochester in 1982. Currently he is Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution and Professor (by Courtesy) of Political Science at Stanford University, having previ- ously taught at the University of Michigan and Michigan State University. His research addresses many areas of international politics including the causes of war, crisis bargaining, alliances, and institutional solutions to the problems of international co-operation. His current research addresses international trade and politics, the role of domestic institutions in foreign policy, and the laws of war. In 1994, Dr. Morrow received the Karl Deutsch Award from the Interna- tional Studies Association. James Lee Ray, b. 1944, received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the Univer- sity of Michigan in 1974. He is currently Professor of Political Science at Van- derbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee. Previously he has held positions at the State University College in Fredonia, New York, the University of New Mex- ico, and Florida State University, where he served as Director of the Internation- al Affairs program from 1985 to 1996. He served on the editorial board of Inter- national Interactions from 1988 to 1991, and is currently on the editorial board of the International Studies Quarterly. His current research interests focus on political forecasts, regime transitions, and the relationship between regime type and interstate conflict. He is the author of an introductory textbook on interna- tional politics, Global Politics, published in its 7th edition in 1998 (Houghton Mifflin). Among his most recent publications are Democracy and International Conflict (University of South Carolina Press, 1995), ‘The Future as Arbiter of Theoretical Controversies: Predictions, Explanations, and the End of the Cold War,’ (with Bruce Russett) in the British Journal of Political Science (1996), ‘The Democratic Path to Peace’ in the Journal of Democracy, (1997), ‘New Tests of Democratic Peace,’ (with John Oneal) Political Research Quarterly, (1997), and ‘Does Democracy Cause Peace?’ in the Annual Review of Political Science (1998). His most recent research deals with the logical construction of multi- variate models, as well as levels of analysis problems as these issues arise in analyses of the relationship between regime types and international conflict. Thomas Risse, b. 1955, is Joint Chair of International Relations in the Depart- ment of Social and Political Science at the Robert Schuman Centre of the Euro- pean University Institute, Florence, Italy. He has previously taught at the Uni- versity of Konstanz, Germany, as well as in the U.S. at Cornell, Yale, and Stanford Universities, and the University of Wyoming. He is the author of Coop- eration among Democracies. The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995) and the editor of Bringing Transnational Relations Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), of (with Richard N. Lebow) of International Relations Theory and the End 201 Contributors of the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), and of (with Stephen C. Ropp and Kathryn Sikkink) The Power of Principles: International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge Universi- ty Press, 1999). He has also contributed articles to World Politics, International Organization, International Security, the European Journal of International Relations, and others. His research interests include international relations the- ory, comparative foreign policy, norms and identity in international politics, and transnational relations. Bruce Russett received his B.A. in Political Economy from Williams College in 1956, an M.A. in Economics from King’s College, Cambridge University in 1957, and his Ph.D. in Political Science from Yale University in 1961. He has held visiting appointments at Columbia University, the University of Michigan, the Free University of Brussels, the University of North Carolina, the Richardson Institute in London, the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study, the University of Tel Aviv, and the University of Tokyo, and is now Dean Acheson Professor of International Rela- tions and Political Science at Yale. He is also Director of United Nations Studies
Recommended publications
  • Joshua D. Kertzer, Resolve in International Politics
    JOSHUA DAVID KERTZER Department of Government, Harvard University 1737 Cambridge St, K206 B [email protected] Cambridge, MA 02138 USA x http://people.fas.harvard.edu/∼jkertzer/ APPOINTMENTS Harvard University • Professor of Government, Department of Government (January 2021 -) – Co-Director, Weatherhead Research Cluster on International Security – Faculty Associate, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs – Faculty Associate, Institute for Quantitative Social Science – Faculty Affiliate, Harvard Working Group in Political Psychology and Behavior (WoGPoP) • Paul Sack Associate Professor of Political Economy, Department of Government (July 2018 - December 2020) • Assistant Professor, Department of Government (July 2014 - June 2018) The Ohio State University • Visiting Associate Professor, Department of Political Science (June 2019 - August 2020) Princeton University • Visiting Associate Research Scholar, Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs (September 2016 - June 2017) Dartmouth College • Dartmouth Fellow in US Foreign Policy and International Security, Dickey Center for International Understanding (Sept. 2013 - June 2014) EDUCATION The Ohio State University. Ph.D., Political Science. 2013. • Dissertation: Resolve in International Politics – Winner of the 2014 CGS/ProQuest Distinguished Dissertation Award for the best dissertation in the social sciences in the previous two years, Council of Graduate Schools – Winner of the 2014 Helen Dwight Reid (now Merze Tate) Award for the best dissertation in international relations, law, and politics, American Political Science Association – Winner of the 2014 Kenneth N. Waltz Award for the best dissertation in the field of international security and arms control, American Political Science Association – Winner of the 2014 Walter Isard Award for the best dissertation in peace science, Peace Science Society (International) – Winner of the 2013 Henry R.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sage Publications: Yvette Pollastrini, Matthew H
    EDITOR BRUCE M. RUSSETT, Yale University MANAGING EDITOR DEBRA L. SHULMAN, Yale University CHAIRMAN ROBERT ABELSON, Yale University EDITORIAL BOARD CHRISTOPHER ACHEN, Political Science, ZEEV MAOZ, Political Science, University of Michigan Tel Aviv University, Israel FULVIO ATTINA, Political Science, FIONA MCGILLIVRAY, Political Science, Yale University of Catania, Italy JAMES MORROW, Political Science, MICHEL BALINSKI, Math, Laboratoire University of Michigan d’Econométrie de l’Ecole Polytechnique, WILLIAM NORDHAUS, Economics, Yale France JOHN R. ONEAL, University of Alabama MAHZARIN BANAJI, Psychology, Yale ANATOL RAPOPORT, University of Toronto PAUL BRACKEN, Political Science and Management, Yale DIANA RICHARDS, Political Science, University of Minnesota STUART BREMER, Political Science, Pennsylvania State University CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, Economics, University of Paris-Dauphine, France FAYE CROSBY, Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz REINHARD SELTEN, Institute for Social and Economic Sciences, University of Bonn, DANIEL DRUCKMAN, Institute for Germany Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University MARTIN SHUBIK, Economics and Management, Yale CAROL EMBER, Anthropology, Human Relations Area Files J. DAVID SINGER, Political Science, University of Michigan JOHN LEWIS GADDIS, History and Political Science, Yale ALEXANDER SMIRNOV, Economics, Central Economic Mathematical Institute HENK HOUWELING, Political Science, University of Amsterdam, ALASTAIR SMITH, Political Science, Yale The Netherlands ALLAN STAM, Political
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Russett CV, 2018-03-14
    Curriculum Vitae July, 2016 BRUCE M. RUSSETT Dean Acheson Research Professor of International Politics and Professor of International and Area Studies in the MacMilllan Center, Yale University Widower (2013) of Cynthia Eagle Russett (Larned Professor of History at Yale); four adult children (Margaret, Mark, Lucia, Daniel Russett); and three grandchildren (Jacob, Zoe, and Thea Russett). Homepage: pantheon.yale.edu/~brusset/ Home address: 70 Martin Terrace Hamden, Connecticut 06517-2333 (203) 248-2364 Office address: Rosenkranz Hall #101 115 Prospect Street New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8301 Tel. (203) 432-5233 Fax: (203) 432-6196 E-mail: [email protected] Degrees: B.A., Political Economy (Highest Honors), magna cum laude, Williams College, 1956 Diploma in Economics, King's College, Cambridge University, 1957 M.A., Ph.D., Political Science, Yale University, 1958, 1961 Honorary Doctorates: Uppsala University, 2002 Williams College, 2011 Positions: Instructor in Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961-62 Assistant Professor, Political Science, Yale University, 1962-66; Associate Professor, 1966-68; Professor 1968-85; Dean Acheson Professor 1985; Dean Acheson Research Professor 2011. Director, World Data Analysis Program, 1962-73; Director of Graduate Studies, Political Science, 1970-72; Chair, International Relations Council, 1970-73; 76-77; Director of Graduate Studies, International Relations, 1974-79; Coordinator, International Security and Arms Control Program, 1985-88; Chair, Political Science Dept., 1990-96;
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Conflict and Interstate Crisis
    Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page i WHO INTERVENES? Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page ii Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page iii Who Intervenes? ETHNIC CONFLICT AND INTERSTATE CRISIS David Carment, Patrick James, and Zeynep Taydas The Ohio State University Press Columbus Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page iv Copyright © 2006 by The Ohio State University Press. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carment, David, 1959– Who intervenes? : ethnic conflict and interstate crisis / David Carment, Patrick James, and Zeynep Taydas. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–8142–1013–9 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0–8142–9010–8 (CD- ROM) 1. Ethnic conflict—Case studies. 2. Conflict management—Case studies. 3. International relations—Case studies. 4. World politics—Case studies. I. James, Patrick, 1957– II. Taydas, Zeynep. III. Title. HM1121.C37 2006 305.8'009'051—dc22 2005018560 Cover design by Dan O’Dair Type set in Sabon Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48–1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page v For my father David William Carment (1928–2004) For the future–Patrick James Wayne and Sarah Smith Brenda For Kahraman, Aynur, and Mehmet Taydas Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page vi Carment_FM_3rd_rev.qxp 12/15/2005 11:27 AM Page vii CONTENTS List of Figures ix List of Maps x Acknowledgments xi Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 a Lakatosian View of the Democratic Peace Research Program
    proofs of author’s revision; tjl corrections entered 7/18 6 A Lakatosian View of the Democratic Peace Research Program James Lee Ray he world’s need for another review of recent research on the “democratic peace” is not apparent.1 Another review by this Tauthor is particularly prone to redundancy.2 But this chapter is not intended to provide a comprehensive review of work on the democratic peace; it gives particularly short shrift to those who are critical of it. I first review briefly Lakatos’s methodology of scientific 1 See, for example, Steve Chan, “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise,” Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 41, No. [XX] (May 1997), pp. 59–91; Bruce Russett and Harvey Starr, “From Democratic Peace to Kantian Peace: Democracy and Conflict in the International System,” in Manus Midlarsky, ed., Handbook of War Studies, 2d ed. (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 93–128. 2 James Lee Ray, “The Democratic Path to Peace,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 8, No. 2 (April 1997), pp. 49–64; James Lee Ray, “Does Democracy Cause Peace?” in Nelson W. Polsby, ed., Annual Review of Political Science (Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1998), pp. 27–46; James Lee Ray, “On the Level(s), Does Democracy Correlate with Peace?” in John A. Vasquez, ed., What Do We Know About War? (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), pp. 219–316. This is a revised version of paper presented earlier at the conference on “Progress in International Relations Theory” (PIRT) in Scottsdale, Arizona, January 15–16, 1999, and at the annual convention of the International Studies Association, Washington, D.C., February 16–20, 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Peace and Integration
    INTRODUCTION One of the four main themes of the Second Workshop on the Workshop is "development," with the present panel concerned with "Aid, Development, and the Global Context." A second theme, which will be linked to development in this paper, looks at "Democratic Transformations." I will attempt to connect these two themes by presenting an essay which links the democratic peace to the now- classic theories of international integration developed by Karl Deutsch and Ernst Haas.1 Through the phenomenon of integration I hope to highlight the importance of the development of community and responsiveness in the democratic peace, and outline the commonalities of this process to the domestic processes which lead to the development of legitimacy. As indicated in McGinnis and Ostrom (1999), a longstanding perspective of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis can be captured in the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. By placing decision makers and decision situations within broader environmental or contextual settings, the IAD may be viewed as one type of agent-structure framework where decisions, choice and choice processes take place within different contexts of possibility, contraints, and opportunity. And, as with all such agent-structure formulations (including the opportunity and willingness framework which I have used extensively in my own analyses; e.g. see Starr 1978, Most and Starr 1989, Starr 1997a), the IAD must cross several levels of analysis and deal with several arenas of action simultaneously. The present paper similarly picks up this multi• level and multi-arena theme— by looking at the nature of integration for interdependent units within the international system, at the democratic peace which exists at the dyadic and regional levels, and finally at democracy and legitimacy within single units.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85 Bruce Russett, John R
    The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85 Bruce Russett, John R. Oneal, and David R. Davis Immanuel Kant’s vision of ‘‘perpetual peace,’’ expressed more than two centuries ago, was built on a tripod of complementary influences: (1) ‘‘republican constitu- tions’’ (in modern parlance, representative democracy) would constrain autocratic caprice in waging war; (2) a ‘‘commercial spirit’’ of trade and economic interdepen- dence would reinforce structural constraints and liberal norms by creating transna- tional ties that encourage accommodation rather than conflict; and (3) international law (and, in the contemporary era, international organizations), building on an under- standing of the legitimate rights of all citizens and of all republics, would provide the moral and legal edifice for the peaceful resolution of conflicts. In Kant’s view, it is not simply that each of the three legs of the tripod is useful; each is essential to maintaining the structure of stable peace.1 These same elements underlie the structure of practical vision and action erected by the statesmen of Europe following World War II—the third devastating European war in seventy years. Konrad Adenauer, Alcide de Gasperi, Jean Monnet, Robert Schuman, and others were instrumental in creating the peace Europe has enjoyed over the last fifty years. First, they acted to restore and stabilize democratic govern- ments in their countries. Then they created a network of economic interdependence that would make future war among those countries economically irrational. And they moved to embed this in the myriad institutional structures that have emerged, in widened and deepened form, in the European Union (EU).
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Emergence and Escalation in Interactive International Dyads
    Portland State University PDXScholar Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations Political Science 11-2002 Conflict Emergence and Escalation in Interactive International Dyads David Todd Kinsella Portland State University Bruce M. Russett Yale University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/polisci_fac Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Models and Methods Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details David Todd Kinsella and Bruce M. Russett. Conflict emergence and escalation in interactive international dyads. Journal of Politics, 64 (4), November 2002, 1045-1068. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. JOPO 062701arfc Conflict Emergence and Escalation in Interactive International Dyads David Kinsella Portland State University Bruce Russett Yale University We examine whether the conditions affecting initial expressions of hostility are similar to those affecting militarized disputes. Analyzing dyadic interactions during the years 1951–1992, we esti- mate a model to take into account selection effects and check it against another allowing conjunc- tive causation. Both provide close approximations to theoretical models of the conflict process and yield similar results. We confirm Kant’s belief that all states are subject to the realist conditions of interstate competition that makes disputes likely, but that liberal influences, if present, can con- strain the escalation of such disputes to war. Several influences on the conflict process have non- monotonic effects over the range of state behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • C.V. – Bruce Russett
    C.V. – Bruce Russett Degrees: B.A., Political Economy (Highest Honors), magna cum laude, Williams College, 1956 Diploma in Economics, King’s College, Cambridge University, 1957 M.A., Ph.D., Political Science, Yale University, 1958, 1961 Honorary Doctorates: Uppsala University, 2002 Williams College, 2011 Positions: Instructor in Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961-62 Assistant Professor, Political Science, Yale University, 1962-66; Associate Professor, 1966-68; Professor 1968-85; Dean Acheson Professor 1985; Dean Acheson Research Professor 2011. Director, World Data Analysis Program, 1962-73; Director of Graduate Studies, Political Science, 1970-72; Chair, International Relations Council, 1970-73; 76- 77; Director of Graduate Studies, International Relations, 1974-79; Coordinator, International Security and Arms Control Program, 1985-88; Chair, Political Science Dept., 1990-96; Director, United Nations Studies at Yale, 1993-2006. Visiting Assistant Professor of Public Law and Government, Columbia University, 1965 Visiting Research Political Scientist, Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan, 1965-66 Visiting Professor, Institut d’Etudes Europeennes, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1969-70 Visiting Scholar, Richardson Institute for Peace & Conflict Research, London, 1973-74 Academic Director, Institute of World Affairs, summer 1976 Visiting Scholar, Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1979-80 Fellow, Netherlands Institute for Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Variance of the Democratic Peace, 1816-2002
    INSTITUTIONAL VARIANCE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PEACE, 1816-2002: ELECTORAL, EXECUTIVE, AND FEDERAL SYSTEMS IN TIME AND SPACE by Anita Schjolset A Dissertation Presented to the FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS) August 2008 Copyright 2008 Anita Schjolset Dedication In Memory of Hayward R. Alker, 1937-2007, who taught me that stories can be written in many languages, that realities have many truths, pointed at issues never raised and to connections never drawn. ii Acknowledgements This dissertation is about the role of governmental institutions in the making of politics between states. It is an effort to show that the effects of spreading democratic institutions to promote peace are more complex than commonly perceived by politicians and academics today. It is motivated by the hope for a more peaceful world, a peace built on tolerance and the acknowledgement that demo- cratic governance must be vested in local cultures and histories. Democracy and democratization may be many-faceted tools for achieving peace. My aim in this dissertation is to start unwrapping some of these relationships. The starting point of this dissertation is the Democratic Peace theory, which provides the most referred to and relied upon ideas of the role regimes play for peace. I argue that this status of the Democratic Peace theory is premature. Despite having uncovered an apparent empirical pattern, the research program1 has by no means provided qualified theoretical explanations. Theory offers clear and comprehensive descriptions of the relations between phenomena. Given the world’s complexity, a theory can only explain parts of an observation, leaving other parts out.
    [Show full text]
  • HARVEY STARR Dag Hammarskjöld Professor in International Affairs Emeritus Department of Political Science Co-Principal, Conflictanalytix™ LLC
    HARVEY STARR Dag Hammarskjöld Professor in International Affairs Emeritus Department of Political Science Co-Principal, ConflictAnalytiX™ LLC Department of Political Science February 2021 University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina 29208 Political Science Dep’t: 803-777-3109 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/harveystarracademic/ ConflictAnalytiX webpage: https://www.conflictanalytix.com/ I. PERSONAL INFORMATION Born: November 11, 1946, New York, New York Married, no children Education: Ph.D., in Political Science, Yale University, December 1971 M.Phil., in Political Science, Yale University, June 1970 B.A., State University of New York at Buffalo, May 1967 II. AREAS OF RESEARCH AND TEACHING SPECIALIZATION Theories and methods in the study of international relations War and international conflict processes/peace research Geopolitics and Diffusion Analyses Domestic Influences on Foreign Policy (internal conflict; democracy; failed states) Language and Conflict/Politics III. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Dag Hammarskjöld Professor in International Affairs Emeritus, 2014– Dag Hammarskjöld Professor in International Affairs, University of South Carolina, 1989-2014 1 Chair, Department of Government and International Studies/Political Science, University of South Carolina, 2000–06 Interim Chair, Department of Government and International Studies, University of South Carolina, 1998--2000 Visiting Fellow, Department of International Relations, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace MICHAEL R
    American Political Science Review Vol. 107, No. 4 November 2013 doi:10.1017/S0003055413000488 c American Political Science Association 2013 Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace MICHAEL R. TOMZ Stanford University JESSICA L. P. WEEKS University of Wisconsin–Madison ne of the most striking findings in political science is the democratic peace: the absence of war between democracies. Some authors attempt to explain this phenomenon by highlighting the role O of public opinion. They observe that democratic leaders are beholden to voters and argue that voters oppose war because of its human and financial costs. This logic predicts that democracies should behave peacefully in general, but history shows that democracies avoid war primarily in their relations with other democracies. In this article we investigate not whether democratic publics are averse to war in general, but whether they are especially reluctant to fight other democracies. We embedded experiments in public opinion polls in the United States and the United Kingdom and found that individuals are substantially less supportive of military strikes against democracies than against otherwise identical autocracies. Moreover, our experiments suggest that shared democracy pacifies the public primarily by changing perceptions of threat and morality, not by raising expectations of costs or failure. These findings shed light on a debate of enduring importance to scholars and policy makers. ew findings in political science have received as gated whether democratic publics are more reluctant much attention as the “democratic peace,” the to attack democracies than autocracies.1 Moreover, the Fdiscovery that democracies almost never fight small body of existing work has not accounted for other democracies (Doyle 1986; Russett 1993).
    [Show full text]