Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Ethics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Ethics Andreas Mogensen All Souls College, Oxford Faculty of Philosophy Evolutionary debunking arguments in ethics A thesis submitted for the degree of D.Phil in Philosophy Hilary Term 2014 University of Oxford 1 Andreas Mogensen, All Souls College, Oxford; Faculty of Philosophy Evolutionary debunking arguments in ethics D.Phil Submission, Hilary 2014 Abstract: I consider whether evolutionary explanations can debunk our moral beliefs. Most contemporary discussion in this area is centred on the question of whether debunking implications follow from our ability to explain elements of human morality in terms of natural selection, given that there has been no selection for true moral beliefs. By considering the most prominent arguments in the literature today, I offer reasons to think that debunking arguments of this kind fail. However, I argue that a successful evolutionary debunking argument can be constructed by appeal to the suggestion that our moral outlook reflects arbitrary contingencies of our phylogeny, much as the horizontal orientation of the whale’s tail reflects its descent from terrestrial quadrupeds. An introductory chapter unpacks the question of whether evolutionary explanations can debunk our moral beliefs, offers a brief historical guide to the philosophical discussion surrounding it, and explains what I mean to contribute to this discussion. Thereafter follow six chapters and a conclusion. The six chapters are divided into three pairs. The first two chapters consider what contemporary scientific evidence can tell us about the evolutionary origins of morality and, in particular, to what extent the evidence speaks in favour of the claims on which debunking arguments rely. The next two chapters offer a critique of popular debunking arguments that are centred on the irrelevance of moral facts in natural selection explanations. The final chapters develop a novel argument for the claim that evolutionary explanations can undermine our moral beliefs insofar as they show that our moral outlook reflects arbitrary contingencies of our phylogeny. A conclusion summarizes my argument and sets out the key questions that arise in its wake. Word count: 74,900 2 Acknowledgments: For helpful comments and discussion of my work in this essay, I am grateful first and foremost to my supervisors, Krister Bykvist and John Hawthorne, and to Matthew Braddock, Daniel Deasy, Hilary Greaves, Cecilia Heyes, William MacAskill, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Amia Srinivasan, and Ralph Wedgwood. I thank All Souls College for supporting my research. Last but not least, I am indebted to Nicola Mastroddi for her love and support. 3 Evolutionary debunking arguments in ethics Table of contents 0. Introduction 5 1. The evolutionary origins of morality: considering the evidence 24 2. Interpreting the evidence: Functional Truth-Irrelevance and Phyletic 71 Contingency 3. Ockham’s Razor, Sensitivity, and the Total/Functional Fallacy 98 4. The Coincidence Problem: a skeptical appraisal 129 5. “The dissentient worlds of other people”: phylogeny, contingency 179 anxiety, and the epistemology of disagreement 6. Epistemic reasons and persons: disagreements in moral intuition as 209 defeaters 7. Conclusion and directions for future research 238 Bibliography 249 4 0. Introduction 1. Introduction Can evolutionary explanations debunk our moral beliefs? In this essay, I offer new reasons to think that this question should be answered in the affirmative and that previous arguments to that effect have been flawed. In this introduction, I’m going to unpack the question, offer a brief historical guide to the philosophical discussion surrounding it, and explain what I mean to contribute to this discussion. The unpacking will be done in section 2, beginning with an outline of some relevant epistemological presuppositions, moving on to consider what qualifies as an evolutionary explanation, and finally addressing whether we should understand our question as encompassing all moral beliefs or just a particular subset. In section 3, I then discuss the history of evolutionary debunking arguments from Darwin to today, noting an important shift in focus with respect to the question of why evolutionary explanations are considered debunking. Finally, in section 4, I outline the aims and structure of this essay. 2. Unpacking the question 2.1 Epistemological presuppositions We are to consider whether our moral beliefs can be debunked by evolutionary explanations. What is it for a belief to be debunked in this sense? My emphasis throughout this essay will be on how evolutionary explanations reflect on the justification (or lack thereof) of our moral beliefs. I assume that the question of 5 justification is intimately connected to normative and deontic questions about what we ought to believe and what we are permitted to believe. In particular, I assume that being justified in believing p is a necessary condition for being permitted to believe p and for it to be the case that you ought to believe p. In choosing to focus on justification, I am to some extent attempting to impose order. Epistemic evaluation is not confined to questions of justification: we can ask whether we know the things we believe, whether our beliefs reflect various epistemic virtues and vices, and so on. Whereas some philosophers who believe that evolutionary explanations impact the epistemic status of our moral beliefs are clear that they’re concerned with justification, others are not so easy to pin down;1 some of their critics have chosen to frame the issue in terms of knowledge, rather than justification.2 I believe that where there is uncertainty, a reasonable interpretation of pro-debunking arguments nonetheless finds the issue of justification in play. I can only really substantiate this exegesis in the ensuing chapters, through my discussion of the various extant debunking arguments. However, I can note the following already here. The debunking power of evolutionary explanations attracts philosophical attention because of the felt possibility that we may be forced to make substantial revisions in our moral outlook in light of new discoveries about the evolutionary origins of morality. For that to be so, it must be the case that evolutionary explanations can speak to what we ought and ought not to believe. As I understand the notion of epistemic justification, they can do so only by addressing the justificatory status of our moral beliefs. I’m going to further interpret the notion of debunking via the well-known idiom of epistemic defeat, introduced by John Pollock (1970, 1986). Thus, evolutionary explanations are debunking iff they supply defeaters. A defeater, roughly speaking, is a 1 Joyce (2001, 2006) is admirably clear; Ruse (1986) is not. 2 See, e.g., Brosnan (2011), Wielenberg (2010). 6 condition that provides a prima facie reason to withhold belief from some proposition that we would otherwise have been justified in believing.3 Defeaters are prima facie reasons to withhold belief: they can themselves be defeated by way of conditions known as defeater-defeaters. (There are also defeater-defeater-defeaters, and so on.) Two classes of defeaters are widely recognized: rebutting and undercutting. A rebutting defeater is a reason to believe the contrary of what you believe (or have justification for believing); an undercutting defeater works instead by casting doubt on the trustworthiness of the grounds for your belief (or the method by which it was formed). Thus, the discovery that evidence which we took to support some hypothesis has been doctored will undermine belief in the hypothesis without necessarily providing any positive reason to think the hypothesis is false: this constitutes a merely undercutting defeater. Some defeaters are hybrid: they both rebut and undercut. It’s plausible that many rebutting defeaters are in fact undercutting as well: if I receive evidence that some method of belief-formation I’ve used gives the wrong result (a rebutting defeater) and I have no reason to expect that the method delivers the wrong result due to random error or noise, I receive evidence that the method is systematically biased toward error (an undercutting defeater). Interpreted in the idiom of defeat, the question we are considering asks, in effect, whether evidence we receive about the evolutionary origins of our moral beliefs could affect their justificatory status so as to cancel any pre-existing entitlement that we might have for holding those beliefs. Thus, I’ll assume that we are prima facie entitled to rely on the relevant beliefs, as well as the methods by which they are formed, including basing our beliefs on our moral intuitions.4 Obviously, if the beliefs that admit of evolutionary explanations are unjustified on independent grounds, there 3 A more exact definition of epistemic defeat requires resolving various complications that needn’t concern us here. See the excellent discussion in Kotzen (ms.). 4 For a defence of intuitions as conferring justification on corresponding beliefs see Huemer (2005). Unlike Huemer, I do not presuppose that intuitions are intellectual seemings, as opposed to, say, inclinations to believe. For further discussion of the role of intuitions in moral psychology see ch. 2. 7 is little point in worrying about the debunking power of evolutionary considerations. We should get rid of them in any case. Another question that we might have considered, but which I set aside, is that of whether evolutionary explanations could simply show our beliefs to be and have been unjustified: whether certain facts about the evolution of human moral psychology might make it the case that our moral beliefs are unjustified, quite apart from the capacity of our awareness of these facts to defeat any prior prima facie entitlement. Philosophers who accept some form of Epistemic Internalism would naturally reject this possibility: they take it that the justificatory status of our beliefs supervenes on factors ‘internal’ to the epistemic agent, which rules out any relevance for facts about the distal causes of our beliefs (apart from our awareness of them). Philosophers who accept Epistemic Externalism, however, would not reject this possibility out of hand.
Recommended publications
  • Roundup Fall 2015
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Roundup LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER Fall | 2015 Global (and cosmic) expansion Expansión global (y cósmica) In this edition… Guest Column 3 ISS Science Corner 4 Veteran explorers slated for future commercial crew flights 5 All aboard the education I’M WRITING THIS COLUMN having only been on the job for about two station! weeks, so I’m still learning the duties of a deputy director. While I have 6 White House lands at the been to the ninth floor of Building 1 many times, it is interesting how I house of human spaceflight have begun to see the center differently as I take on this new role. to praise our Commitment to I was the Orion Program manager for nearly eight years. During that Action for Hispanic education time, I experienced many transitions in NASA leadership and policy. 8 ‘Leaf’ it to NASA to grow Some of these were difficult for the team to weather, but they met the lettuce on space station challenge. I believe these experiences taught me how to anticipate, adapt and lead a team through change. It is my hope that these 9 It’s complicated: New Pluto experiences will provide me the insight to help Ellen lead the center images from NASA’s New into NASA’s next chapters of human spaceflight. Horizons offer many surprises I know that the other programs and directorates at JSC are faced 10 Meet Delene Sedillo, with their own specific, dynamic environments. In the coming weeks, NASA/PHOTO Associate Director, Office of I’ll be taking some time to get an understanding of the strategies and Mark Geyer Procurement challenges involving all of the organizations here at JSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Ethics 2
    It is still disputed, however, why moral behavior extends beyond a close circle of kin and reciprocal relationships: e.g., most people think stealing from anyone is wrong, not just stealing from family and friends. For moral behavior to evolve as we understand it today, there likely had to be selective pressures that pushed people to disregard their own 1000wordphilosophy.com/2018/10/11/evolution- interests in favor of their group’s interest.[3] Exactly and-ethics/ how morality extended beyond this close circle is debated, with many theories under consideration.[4] Evolution and Ethics 2. What Should We Do? Author: Michael Klenk Suppose our ability to understand and apply moral Category: Ethics, Philosophy of Science rules, as typically understood, can be explained by Word Count: 999 natural selection. Does evolution explain which rules We often follow what are considered basic moral we should follow?[5] rules: don’t steal, don’t lie, help others when we can. Some answer, “yes!” “Greed captures the essence of But why do we follow these rules, or any rules the evolutionary spirit,” says the fictional character understood as “moral rules”? Does evolution explain Gordon Gekko in the 1987 film Wall Street: “Greed why? If so, does evolution have implications for … is good. Greed is right.”[6] which rules we should follow, and whether we genuinely know this? Gekko’s claims about what is good and right and what we ought to be comes from what he thinks we This essay explores the relations between evolution naturally are: we are greedy, so we ought to be and morality, including evolution’s potential greedy.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Pacific Division Meeting Program 2017
    The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION NINETY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM THE WESTIN SEATTLE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON APRIL 12 – 15, 2017 VIVA VOCE ENTANGLEMENTS Conversations with A System of Philosophy Italian Philosophers Crispin Sartwell Silvia Benso CENTERING NEO-CONFUCIAN AND EXTENDING ECOLOGICAL HUMANISM NEW FORMS An Essay on An Interpretive Engage- OF REVOLT Metaphysical Sense ment with Wang Fuzhi Essays on Kristeva’s Steven G. Smith (1619–1692) Intimate Politics Nicholas S. Brasovan Sarah K. Hansen and Available May 2017 Rebecca Tuvel, editors EDGAR ALLAN POE, Available June 2017 EUREKA, AND GOD AND THE SELF SCIENTIFIC IN HEGEL CONFUCIANISM, A IMAGINATION Beyond Subjectivism HABIT OF THE HEART David N. Stamos Paolo Diego Bubbio Bellah, Civil Religion, Available July 2017 and East Asia SELF-REALIZATION Philip J. Ivanhoe and THROUGH CONFUCIAN ZHUANGZI’S CRITIQUE Sungmoon Kim, editors LEARNING OF THE CONFUCIANS A Contemporary Blinded by the Human ESSAYS ON THE FOUN- Reconstruction of Kim-chong Chong DATIONS OF ETHICS Xunzi’s Ethics Siufu Tang WHITEHEAD’S C. I. Lewis RELIGIOUS THOUGHT John Lange, editor From Mechanism to Available June 2017 POETIC FRAGMENTS Organism, From Force Karoline von Günderrode to Persuasion THE VARIETY OF Translated and with Daniel A. Dombrowski INTEGRAL ECOLOGIES Introductory Essays by Nature, Culture, Anna C. Ezekiel CONFUCIANISM AND and Knowledge AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY in the Planetary Era MOUNTAINS, RIVERS, Mathew A. Foust Sam Mickey, Sean Kelly, AND THE GREAT EARTH and Adam Robbert, Reading
    [Show full text]
  • Careers Service Opportunity to Live out Their Dreams of Exploring Our World
    Case Study: Alumni Andreas Mogensen, MEng Aeronautical Engineering Graduation Year: 1999 Job Title: Astronaut Employer: European Space Agency Department: European Astronaut Center Could you give us some information about yourself and your role? I was selected by the European Space Agency in 2009 as one of six new European astronauts and the first astronaut from Denmark. Since then I have been based at the European Astronaut Center in Cologne, Germany. Currently, I am training for my first spaceflight, “Being a student is an launching on 1 September 2015 with the Russian Soyuz spacecraft opportunity in your life to from Baikonur, Kazakhstan to the International Space Station. gain unique experiences The mission will involve a mixture of science experiments and and Imperial College technology developments. In addition, I will serve as co-pilot on board Soyuz, which means I will be trained to fly and land the offers so much more spacecraft manually. than just an education” - Andreas Mogensen Life as an astronaut is predominantly about training and learning new skills. This includes everything from classroom-based technical training on all the onboard systems to the much more practical training on how to perform a spacewalk or control the robotic arm. And of course there is also Russian language training on top of it. All of this training takes place among the international partners behind the ISS program, which means that I am constantly travelling between NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Star City in Russia, and the European Astronaut Center. The training is intended to teach us new skills, but it doesn’t teach us much about life in space.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociobiology and the Origins of Ethics
    SOCIOBIOLOGY AND THE ORIGINS OF ETHICS JULIO MUÑOZ-RUBIO ABSTRACT. According to sociobiology, ethics is an offspring of natural selection and totally explicable through biology. According to this discipline, any indi- vidual has reproduction as its supreme life objective, and thus ethical principles are directly originated from such objective. This criterion subordinates choice to “natural” duties and eradicates the power of human free will to generate values. Sociobiology falls into the natural fallacy as it assumes that a moral “duty” derived from a particular behavior is justified by the same existence of such behavior. This paper sustains that humans are qualitative different from the rest of animals since they exist in spheres afar from strict biological ones; sociobiology subjugates human freedom to the necessity realm and build up an ideological discourse. KEY WORDS. Ethics, evolutionary theory, ideology, naturalist fallacy, sociobi- ology, survival, liberty, necessity, dearth, free will. INTRODUCTION Sociobiological theory deals with animal species that are “social”, that is, they form groups, develop a certain division of labor, and cooperate in order to survive in the struggle for existence. For this reason, these species appear from the start as if they were endowed with moral attributes. “Social” animals possess qualities comparable to human beings not only insofar they are born and die, develop, reproduce, become ill, nor since they relate to other beings of the same and even of other species, but because, as they perform all these various functions in their peculiar ways, they exhibit emotional and behavioral patterns curiously akin to those of human beings. One of the main sources of sociobiology is Darwinist theory which, upon refuting creationism and affirming the principle of continuity in the evolution of species, denies the existence of overall qualitative differences between human beings and higher animals (Darwin 1981, Part I, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2006 Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels Stephen Bauer Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Christianity Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bauer, Stephen, "Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels" (2006). Dissertations. 16. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/16 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary MORAL IMPLICATIONS OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION FOR HUMAN PREFERENCE BASED IN CHRISTIAN ETHICS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE TO THE “MORAL INDIVIDUALISM” OF JAMES RACHELS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Stephen Bauer November 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3248152 Copyright 2006 by Bauer, Stephen All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Charles Darwin
    teorema Vol. XXVIII/2, 2009, pp. 123-133 [BIBLID 0210-1602 (2009) 28:2; pp. 123-133] ‘The Social Instincts Naturally Lead to the Golden Rule’: The Ethics of Charles Darwin John Mizzoni […] the social instincts […] with the aid of active intellectual powers and the effects of habit, naturally lead to the golden rule, “As ye would that men should do to you, do ye to them likewise;” and this lies at the foundation of morality. [DARWIN, The Descent of Man (1871), p. 71] RESUMEN En The Descent of Man, Darwin discute una gran variedad de problemas éticos de manera exclusiva, dice él, desde la perspectiva de la historia natural. Intentando situar los puntos de vista de Darwin sobre la evolución y la ética dentro de las discusiones contemporáneas sobre filosofía moral reviso, en primer lugar, cómo el enfoque que Darwin hace de la evolución y la ética encaja en la metaética contemporánea, especialmente con cuatro teorías de tales como la del error, el expresi- vismo, el relativismo y el realismo. PALABRAS CLAVE: Darwin, metaética, teoría del error, expresivismo, relativismo moral, realismo moral. ABSTRACT In the The Descent of Man, Darwin discusses a wide variety of ethical issues, exclusively, he says, from the perspective of natural history. As an attempt to situate Darwin’s views on evolution and ethics into contemporary discussions of moral theory, in this paper I first look at how Darwin’s approach to evolution and ethics fits in with contemporary metaethical theory, specifically the four theories of error theory, expressivism, relativism, and realism. KEYWORDS: Darwin, metaethics, error theory, expressivism, moral relativism, moral realism.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter
    Human Spaceflight in Social Media: Promoting Space Exploration Through Twitter Pierre J. Bertrand,1 Savannah L. Niles,2 and Dava J. Newman1,3 turn back now would be to deny our history, our capabilities,’’ said James Michener.1 The aerospace industry has successfully 1 Man-Vehicle Laboratory, Department of Aeronautics and Astro- commercialized Earth applications for space technologies, but nautics; 2Media Lab, Department of Media Arts and Sciences; and 3 human space exploration seems to lack support from both fi- Department of Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of nancial and human public interest perspectives. Space agencies Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. no longer enjoy the political support and public enthusiasm that historically drove the human spaceflight programs. If one uses ABSTRACT constant year dollars, the $16B National Aeronautics and While space-based technologies for Earth applications are flourish- Space Administration (NASA) budget dedicated for human ing, space exploration activities suffer from a lack of public aware- spaceflight in the Apollo era has fallen to $7.9B in 2014, of ness as well as decreasing budgets. However, space exploration which 41% is dedicated to operations covering the Internati- benefits are numerous and include significant science, technological onal Space Station (ISS), the Space Launch System (SLS) and development, socioeconomic benefits, education, and leadership Orion, and commercial crew programs.2 The European Space contributions. Recent robotic exploration missions have
    [Show full text]
  • On Sidgwick's Demise: a Reply to Professor Deigh
    On Sidgwick’s Demise: A Reply to Professor Deigh ANTHONY SKELTON The University of Western Ontario In ‘Sidgwick’s Epistemology’, John Deigh argues that Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ and that interest in it declined considerably after Sidgwick’s death because the epistemology on which it relied ‘increasingly became suspect in analytic philosophy and eventually [it was] discarded as obsolete’. In this article I dispute these claims. In a recent article in this journal, John Deigh1 argues that Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics2 ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ (438), and that interest in it declined considerably after Sidgwick’s death because the epistemology on which it relied ‘increasingly became suspect in analytic philosophy and eventually [it was] discarded as obsolete’ (439). In this article I dispute these claims. I Deigh argues that Sidgwick’s Methods ‘was not perceived during his lifetime as a major and lasting contribution to British moral philosophy’ (438). However, this is far from clear. First, to make his point Deigh relies on an article in Encyclopaedia Britannica and an obituary in Mind by Leslie Stephen.3 These are not decisive. Stephen announces at the outset of his obituary that he is not concerned to provide an estimate of Sidgwick’s work in philosophy, though he notes that Methods is a ‘great book’ and that Sidgwick’s work in ethics gave ‘the most important of all modern contributions towards a clear realisation of the conditions of approaching the problems involved’.4 The encyclopaedia article does not deny that Methods is a major contribution; instead, it merely fails to single it out.5 Second, a number of important philosophers were sent copies of Methods when the first edition was published in 1874, 1 John Deigh, ‘Sidgwick’s Epistemology’, Utilitas 19 (2007), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • En El Espacio
    JetNews Aprovechará Santander las @JetNewsMX reformas para consolidarse www.jetnews.com.mx After reforms, Santander looks towards consolidati No. 186 Año 9 • Del 1 al 15 de octubre 2015 pág. / page 2 Ejemplar gratuito, prohibida su venta • Free copy, not for sale Breaking records in space Russian cosmonaut Gennady RÉCORD » Padalka has spent 879 days in outer space, becoming the human who en el espacio has been the most time in space 7-year old Russian cosmonaut, Gen- El ruso Gennady Padalka acumuló 5nady Padalka, is the human being who 879 días en el espacio, es el humano has spent the most time in space, for a » total of 879 days through five different que más tiempo ha permanecido missions, two months more than Sergei en el espacio Krikalev, who was the previous record holder. Padalka, Coronel of the Russian l cosmonauta ruso, de 57 años, Genn- Air Forces, made his first trip to space in Eady Padalka es el ser humano que más 1998 on board of the Mir Space Station. tiempo ha pasado en el espacio, con un It is important to point out that he is total de 879 días repartidos en cinco misio- the only person that has commanded the nes, dos meses más que Sergei Krikalev, International Space Station four times. quien ostentaba el anterior récord. Padalka, He broke the record as being the person coronel de la Fuerza Aérea de Rusia, reali- who has been the most time in space on zó su primer viaje al espacio en 1998 a la June 28, 2015 and has participated in 10 estación espacial Mir.
    [Show full text]
  • 003B Alhoff 83
    Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 25 (2003), 83-111 ---83 Evolutionary Ethics from Darwin to Moore Fritz Allhoff Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA ABSTRACT - Evolutionary ethics has a long history, dating all the way back to Charles Darwin.1 Almost immediately after the publication of the Origin, an immense interest arose in the moral implications of Darwinism and whether the truth of Darwinism would undermine traditional ethics. Though the biological thesis was certainly exciting, nobody suspected that the impact of the Origin would be confined to the scientific arena. As one historian wrote, ‘whether or not ancient populations of armadillos were transformed into the species that currently inhabit the new world was certainly a topic about which zoologists could disagree. But it was in discussing the broader implications of the theory…that tempers flared and statements were made which could transform what otherwise would have been a quiet scholarly meeting into a social scandal’ (Farber 1994, 22). Some resistance to the biological thesis of Darwinism sprung from the thought that it was incompatible with traditional morality and, since one of them had to go, many thought that Darwinism should be rejected. However, some people did realize that a secular ethics was possible so, even if Darwinism did undermine traditional religious beliefs, it need not have any effects on moral thought.2 Before I begin my discussion of evolutionary ethics from Darwin to Moore, I would like to make some more general remarks about its development.3 There are three key events during this history of evolutionary ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • → Space for Europe European Space Agency
    number 164 | 4th quarter 2015 bulletin → space for europe European Space Agency The European Space Agency was formed out of, and took over the rights and The ESA headquarters are in Paris. obligations of, the two earlier European space organisations – the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) and the European Launcher Development The major establishments of ESA are: Organisation (ELDO). The Member States are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands. Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada is a Cooperating State. ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany. In the words of its Convention: the purpose of the Agency shall be to provide for ESRIN, Frascati, Italy. and to promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in space research and technology and their space applications, with a view ESAC, Madrid, Spain. to their being used for scientific purposes and for operational space applications systems: EAC, Cologne, Germany. → by elaborating and implementing a long-term European space policy, by ECSAT, Harwell, United Kingdom. recommending space objectives to the Member States, and by concerting the policies of the Member States with respect to other national and international ESA Redu, Belgium. organisations and institutions; → by elaborating and implementing activities and programmes in the space field; → by coordinating the European space programme and national programmes, and by integrating the latter progressively and as completely as possible into the European space programme, in particular as regards the development of applications Co-Chairs of the Council: satellites; Bo Andersen and Jean-Yves Le Gall → by elaborating and implementing the industrial policy appropriate to its programme and by recommending a coherent industrial policy to the Member States.
    [Show full text]