Guide to the Forest History Society Photograph Collection [PDF]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mark Your Calendar
MARK YOUR CALENDAR OLD FORESTS, NEW MANAGEMENT: CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY–100TH ANNUAL CONSERVATION AND USE OF OLD-GROWTH FORESTS GENERAL MEETING AND CONFERENCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY September 7–10, 2008. Fredericton, New Brunswick. Contact: February 17–21, 2008. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. An interna- CIF, 151 Slater Street, Suite 504 Ottawa, ON K1P 5H3; Phone: tional scientific conference hosted by the CRC for Forestry, 613-234-2242; Fax: 613-234-6181; [email protected]; http://www.cif- Forestry Tasmania, and the International Union of Forest ifc.org/english/e-agms.shtml. Research Organizations. Contact: Conference Design, Sandy Bay Tasmania 7006, Australia; Phone: +61 03 6224 3773; SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS [email protected]; www.cdesign.com.au/oldforests2008/. NATIONAL CONVENTION November 5–9, 2008. Reno, Nevada. Contact: William V. Brumby, ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FOREST Society of American Foresters; Phone: 301-897-8720, ext. 129; PROFESSIONALS CONFERENCE AND ANNUAL GENERAL [email protected]; www.safnet.org. MEETING February 20–22, 2008. Penticton, British Columbia. Theme: “Facets AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY of Our Future Forests.” Contact: ExpoFor 2008, Association of ANNUAL MEETING BC Forest Professionals, 1030–1188 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, February 25–March 1, 2009. Tallahassee, Florida. Contact: Fritz BC V6E 4A2. Phone: 604-687-8027; Fax: 604-687-3264; info@expo- Davis, local arrangements chair, at [email protected]; www.aseh.net/ for.ca; http://www.expofor.ca/contactus/contactus.htm. conferences. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY FIRST WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY CONVENTION ANNUAL MEETING August 4–9, 2009. Copenhagen, Denmark. Sponsored by the March 12–16, 2008. -
Restoration of Dry Forests in Eastern Oregon
Restoration of Dry Forests in Eastern Oregon A FIELD GUIDE Acknowledgements Many ideas incorporated into this field guide originated during conversations between the authors and Will Hatcher, of the Klamath Tribes, and Craig Bienz, Mark Stern and Chris Zanger of The Nature Conservancy. The Nature Conservancy secured support for developing and printing this field guide. Funding was provided by the Fire Learning Network*, the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, the U.S. Forest Service Region 6, The Nature Conservancy, the Weyerhaeuser Family Foundation, and the Northwest Area Foundation. Loren Kellogg assisted with the discussion of logging systems. Bob Van Pelt granted permission for reproduction of a portion of his age key for ponderosa pine. Valuable review comments were provided by W.C. Aney, Craig Bienz, Mike Billman, Darren Borgias, Faith Brown, Rick Brown, Susan Jane Brown, Pete Caligiuri, Daniel Donato, James A. Freund, Karen Gleason, Miles Hemstrom, Andrew J. Larson, Kelly Lawrence, Mike Lawrence, Tim Lillebo, Kerry Metlen, David C. Powell, Tom Spies, Mark Stern, Darin Stringer, Eric Watrud, and Chris Zanger. The layout and design of this guide were completed by Keala Hagmann and Debora Johnson. Any remaining errors and misjudgments are ours alone. *The Fire Learning Network is part of a cooperative agreement between The Nature Conservancy, USDA Forest Service and agencies of the Department of the Interior: this institution is an equal opportunity provider. Suggested Citation: Franklin, J.F., K.N. Johnson, D.J. Churchill, K. Hagmann, D. Johnson, and J. Johnston. 2013. Restoration of dry forests in eastern Oregon: a field guide. The Nature Conservancy, Portland, OR. -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NAT
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior $p National Park Service JUL - 5 I996 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NAT. REGISTER OF HiSiQfiiCKA CFS NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Hull, Ralph, Lumber Company Mill Complex other names/site number Hull-Oakes Limber Company Mill 2. Location street & number 23837 Dawson Road N/A not for publication city or town Monroe Kl vicinity state Oregon code OR county Benton code 003 zip icode 97456 As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this US nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property IS meets EH does not meet the National Register criteria. -
STIHL MSA 220 C Owners Instruction Manual
Instruction Manual STIHL MSA 220 C Manual de instrucciones WARNING To reduce the risk of kickback injury use STIHL reduced kickback bar and STIHL low kickback chain as specified in this manual or other available low kickback components. ADVERTENCIA Para reducir el riesgo de lesionarse como resultado de un culatazo, utilice la barra y la cadena de contragolpe reducido de la forma especificada en este manual o de otros componentes reductores de contragolpe. WARNING ADVERTENCIA Read Instruction Manual thoroughly before use and Antes de usar la máquina lea y siga todas las precauciones follow all safety precautions – improper use can cause de seguridad dadas en el manual de instrucciones – el uso serious or fatal injury. incorrecto puede causar lesiones graves o mortales. Instruction Manual 1 - 63 Manual de instrucciones 64 - 131 English Contents 8.2 Bucking . 24 1 Introduction . 3 8.3 Limbing . 25 2 Guide to Using this Manual . 3 8.4 Pruning . 26 2.1 Signal Words. 3 8.5 Cutting Logs Under Tension . 27 2.2 Symbols in Text . 3 8.6 Felling . 28 3 Main Parts . 4 9 Battery Safety. 31 3.1 Chain Saw and Battery . 4 9.1 Warnings and Instructions . 31 4 Safety Symbols on the Products . 5 10 Maintenance, Repair and Storage . 33 4.1 Chain Saw . 5 10.1 Warnings and Instructions . 33 Original Instruction Manual 4.2 Battery . 5 11 Before Starting Work . 34 5 General Power Tool Safety Warnings. 6 11.1 Preparing the Chain Saw for Operation . 34 5.1 Introduction . 6 12 Charging the Battery . 34 5.2 Work Area Safety . -
Code of Practice for Wood Processing Facilities (Sawmills & Lumberyards)
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR WOOD PROCESSING FACILITIES (SAWMILLS & LUMBERYARDS) Version 2 January 2012 Guyana Forestry Commission Table of Contents FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Wood Processing................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Development of the Code ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Scope of the Code ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Objectives of the Code ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Implementation of the Code ............................................................................................................. 10 2.0 PRE-SAWMILLING RECOMMENDATIONS. ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Market Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 General .......................................................................................................................................... -
Guide to the Mccleary Experimental Forest
akec Mt. A GUIDE TO THE ;0-c :f !•• McCLEARY EXPERIMENTAL FOREST Me CLEARY, WASHINGTON About This File: . This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Misscans identified by the software have been corrected; ho e · \f\/ r-_ some mistakes may remain. _ ANGELES L l OLYMPIC lI NATIONAL ';I I _,J PARK ;-' ) -,_ ___ 1 __, r' "1) --· .......... 'l::> :__ :.. ... -----.. _J C') ., C') : \\\ .. I ,,,.,[/,-. i:-:;:::-=- A RY 1 '·\·,..... ' c Al FOREST C') L_/_:---/ "' 'l::> <: MAINTAINED JOINTLY BY THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST FOREST S RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Mt. Adams PUGET SOUND RESEARCH CENTER AND THE SIMP SON LOGGING COMPANY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE PORTLAND, OREGON 1954 - - - (I) A GUIDE TO THE ... <I) McCLEARY EXPERIMENTAL FOREST · 3: 0 - "' (I) The McCleary Experimental Forest is a co ... operative undertaking in forest research by private·industry and the United States Forest -0 (I) Service. Here, the Simpson Logging Company and - ::1 the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment e Station, through its Puget Sound branch, conduct 0 studies and demonstrations in management of young z ...: (I) growth forests. This is one of four experimental - -• I:: (I) forests in the Puget Sound region dedicated to ::1 u 0 improvement of management practices through coop >. >. c erative research. Under a long-term agreement, - u the Forest Service prepares the management plan, "'0 >. 0 ... 0 0 outlines experiments, and regulates cutting .... (I) schedules. The Simpson Logging Company provides -cu u I::0:2 fire protection, develops roads, and cuts and markets the products. An Advisory Committee of E c. 0 foresters actively engaged in forest management ->. -
Tree Density and Forest Productivity in a Heterogeneous Alpine Environment: Insights from Airborne Laser Scanning and Imaging Spectroscopy
Article Tree Density and Forest Productivity in a Heterogeneous Alpine Environment: Insights from Airborne Laser Scanning and Imaging Spectroscopy Parviz Fatehi 1,*, Alexander Damm 1, Reik Leiterer 1, Mahtab Pir Bavaghar 2, Michael E. Schaepman 1 and Mathias Kneubühler 1 1 Remote Sensing Laboratories (RSL), University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (M.E.S.); [email protected] (M.K.) 2 Center for Research and Development of Northern Zagros Forests, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, 66177-15175 Sanandaj, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +41-44-635-6508 Academic Editors: Christian Ginzler and Lars T. Waser Received: 8 March 2017; Accepted: 9 June 2017; Published: 16 June 2017 Abstract: We outline an approach combining airborne laser scanning (ALS) and imaging spectroscopy (IS) to quantify and assess patterns of tree density (TD) and forest productivity (FP) in a protected heterogeneous alpine forest in the Swiss National Park (SNP). We use ALS data and a local maxima (LM) approach to predict TD, as well as IS data (Airborne Prism Experiment—APEX) and an empirical model to estimate FP. We investigate the dependency of TD and FP on site related factors, in particular on surface exposition and elevation. Based on reference data (i.e., 1598 trees measured in 35 field plots), we observed an underestimation of ALS-based TD estimates of 40%. Our results suggest a limited sensitivity of the ALS approach to small trees as well as a dependency of TD estimates on canopy heterogeneity, structure, and species composition. -
Implications of Selective Harvesting of Natural Forests for Forest Product Recovery and Forest Carbon Emissions: Cases from Tarai Nepal and Queensland Australia
Article Implications of Selective Harvesting of Natural Forests for Forest Product Recovery and Forest Carbon Emissions: Cases from Tarai Nepal and Queensland Australia Bishnu Hari Poudyal, Tek Narayan Maraseni * and Geoff Cockfield Centre for Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland 4350, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 July 2019; Accepted: 13 August 2019; Published: 15 August 2019 Abstract: Selective logging is one of the main natural forest harvesting approaches worldwide and contributes nearly 15% of global timber needs. However, there are increasing concerns that ongoing selective logging practices have led to decreased forest product supply, increased forest degradation, and contributed to forest based carbon emissions. Taking cases of natural forest harvesting practices from the Tarai region of Nepal and Queensland Australia, this study assesses forest product recovery and associated carbon emissions along the timber production chain. Field measurements and product flow analysis of 127 commercially harvested trees up to the exit gate of sawmills and interaction with sawmill owners and forest managers reveal that: (1) Queensland selective logging has less volume recovery (52.8%) compared to Nepal (94.5%) leaving significant utilizable volume in the forest, (2) Stump volume represents 5.5% of total timber volume in Nepal and 3.9% in Queensland with an average stump height of 43.3 cm and 40.1 cm in Nepal and Queensland respectively, (3) Average sawn timber output from the harvested logs is 36.3% in Queensland against 3 3 61% in Nepal, (4) Nepal and Queensland leave 0.186 Mg C m− and 0.718 Mg C m− on the forest floor respectively, (5) Each harvested tree damages an average of five plant species in Nepal and four in Queensland predominantly seedlings in both sites, and (6) Overall logging related total emissions in 3 3 Queensland are more than double (1.099 Mg C m− ) those in Nepal (0.488 Mg C m− ). -
How to Cut Down a Tree: Safe and Effective Tree Felling, Limbing and Bucking
FWM-00200 UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS How to Cut Down a Tree: Safe and Effective Tree Felling, Limbing and Bucking The occasional, nonprofessional sawyer will greatly benefit by learning the basic methods used in tree felling and cutting. Many Alaskans use chainsaws around their homes trimming, log home building and more. and properties. In this publication basic techniques used to cut down a tree and render it into logs and According to the federal Occupational Safety and firewood will be presented. The term “sawyer” will Health Administration (OSHA), “More people are refer to the person cutting down, or “felling,” the tree killed while felling trees than any other logging activ- and making products from it, including firewood, ity.” A minor chainsaw cut can be dangerous and hard cabin and saw logs. to treat in the field. Safety must be the top priority when operating a chainsaw for any use. More dan- Private forest landowners often harvest timber to gerous than injuries caused by the running chainsaw manage and improve their woodlot and make use of itself are those injuries caused when the sawyer or a trees that have been windblown, killed by insects or helper are struck by something that falls out of the selected for removal. In forested regions of Alaska, the tree or is catapulted into the air by the act of the tree chainsaw may be the most common power hand tool being felled. Again, safety first. and it is also recognized as the most hazardous power hand tool. It is imperative that the operator/sawyer Tree cutting can be dangerous whether done by a and those working close by pay special attention to homeowner or by commercial tree cutters. -
Archival Copy. for Current Version, See
Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/4-h331 4-H 331 REPRINTED JULY 2005 $8.00 Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/4-h331 Oregon 4-H Forestry Member Manual Contents Lesson 1: Welcome to Oregon 4-H Forestry 1 Lesson 2: Forests in Oregon 4 Lesson 3 Looking Closer 7 Lesson 4 Succession 9 Lesson 5 Oregon's Most Common Trees 12 Lesson 6: How to Find a Tree's Family Tree 14 Lesson 7 Growing Every Which Way' 18 Lesson 8: From Seedlings to Spires 21 Lesson 9: Spreading the Seed 23 Lesson 10 The Dynamic Forest Ecosystem 26 Lesson 11 Silviculture Equals Forest Management 30 Lesson 12: Fire 33 Lesson 13: Wildlife and the Forest 36 Lesson 14 Harvesting 39 Lesson 15 Trees in Urban Ecosystems 43 Appendices Appendix A Answers to forestry puzzles 46 Appendix B Extension pubhcations The Wildlife Garden 48 Glossary of Tree Terms 49 Resources and Acknowledgments 52 Adapted for use in Oregon from Minnesota Extension Service 4-H youth forestry materials by Judy Dickerson, former 4-H youth development faculty. Josephine County; and Virginia Bourdeau, Extension specialist, 4-H youth development, Oregon State University. Archival copy. For current version, see: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/4-h331 Lesson 1 Welcome to Oregon 4-H Forestry is a wonderful state. Forested land is found in every region. It's good to know about the types of Oregonplants and land use that dominate your home state. You are in charge of writing a The goals of the Oregon 4-H Forestry Project are to give recipe for a forest. -
Wood from Midwestern Trees Purdue EXTENSION
PURDUE EXTENSION FNR-270 Daniel L. Cassens Professor, Wood Products Eva Haviarova Assistant Professor, Wood Science Sally Weeks Dendrology Laboratory Manager Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University Indiana and the Midwestern land, but the remaining areas soon states are home to a diverse array reforested themselves with young of tree species. In total there are stands of trees, many of which have approximately 100 native tree been harvested and replaced by yet species and 150 shrub species. another generation of trees. This Indiana is a long state, and because continuous process testifies to the of that, species composition changes renewability of the wood resource significantly from north to south. and the ecosystem associated with it. A number of species such as bald Today, the wood manufacturing cypress (Taxodium distichum), cherry sector ranks first among all bark, and overcup oak (Quercus agricultural commodities in terms pagoda and Q. lyrata) respectively are of economic impact. Indiana forests native only to the Ohio Valley region provide jobs to nearly 50,000 and areas further south; whereas, individuals and add about $2.75 northern Indiana has several species billion dollars to the state’s economy. such as tamarack (Larix laricina), There are not as many lumber quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), categories as there are species of and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) that trees. Once trees from the same are more commonly associated with genus, or taxon, such as ash, white the upper Great Lake states. oak, or red oak are processed into In urban environments, native lumber, there is no way to separate species provide shade and diversity the woods of individual species. -
Felling, Bucking and Limbing Trees
Safety AGRICULTURAL MU Guide PUBLISHED BY MU EXTENSION, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA muextension.missouri.edu/xplor Felling, Bucking and Limbing Trees Bruce E. Cutter, School of Natural Resources David E. Baker, Extension Safety Specialist Whether you are using your chain saw to cut fire- there is an unknown amount of wood holding the wood, trim trees or harvest large timber, you will be tree up, you may not able to control the direction of performing three basic operations — felling, bucking fall of the tree or it may fall prematurely, endangering and limbing of trees. Felling involves cutting the you and others around you. standing tree and dropping it in the place you want it. Lean. Most trees display some indication of the Limbing is the removal of the branches from either direction in which they will tend to fall. This is shown standing or downed trees. Bucking is the process of by an uneven crown, as when most of the branches cutting the downed tree into appropriate lengths. For are on one side of the tree, or by a lean of the trunk of information on the selection and safe use of a chain the tree itself. An easy way to determine the lean of a saw, see MU publication G 1959, Basic Chain Saw tree is to stand back 25 to 50 feet and use a plumb line Safety and Use. to sight on the trunk of the tree. It is best to do this from two sides. This publication is not intended for the profes- Wind. The wind will push the crown of the tree.