DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia Spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus Spp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia Spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus Spp Supplementary material Phylogenetic position of Geosmithia spp. (Hypocreales) living in Juniperus spp. forests (Cupressaceae) with bark beetles of Phloeosinus spp. (Scolytinae) from the northeast of Mexico Hernández-García J. A.1, 2, Cuellar-Rodríguez G., Aguirre-Ojeda N. G.1, Villa-Tanaca L.2, Hernández-Rodríguez C.2, 1 and Armendáriz-Toledano F.3* 1 Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Departamento de Silvicultura, Carretera Nacional No. 85, Km. 145, Linares, Nuevo León C.P. 67700, México; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Microbiología, Ciudad de México C.P. 11340, México; [email protected], [email protected] 3 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Zoología, Colección Nacional de Insectos, Cto. Zona Deportiva S/N, Ciudad Universitaria. CDMX, Mexico C.P. 04510; * Correspondence: Correspondence: [email protected] ; + 55-56-22-92-50 ext. 47833 (F.A.T) Table S1. Hosts and Scolytinae vectors species associated with strains from Geosmithia langdonii-Geosmithia sp. 32 and Geosmithia sp. 21-G. xerotolerans clades. Fungal species Host species Vectors species Aphanartrum sp., Chaetoptelius Euphorbia dendroides L., Pistacea lentiscus L., vestitus Mulsant and Rey, Cryphalus Pistaceae vera L., Baccharis pilularis DC., pubescens Hopkins, Ernoporus tiliae Chamaecyparis pisifera (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl., Panzer, Monarthrum scutellare Cupressus goveniana Gordon, Cupressus LeConte, Phloeosinus cupressi macrocarpa Hartw. ex Gordon, Euphorbia a sp. 32 Hopkins, Phloeosinus equoia dendroides L., Notholithocarpus densiflorus (Hook. Hopkins, Phloeosinus thujae Perris, & Arn.) P. S. Manos, C. H. Cannon & S.H. Oh, Pityogenes knechteli Swaine, Pinus ponderosa P. Lawson & C. Lawson, Pistacia eosmithi G Pityophthorus sp. Eichhoff, lentiscus L., Quercus dalechampii Ten., Quercus - Pseudopityophthorus pubipennis petraea Mattuschka, Quercus robur L., Quercus LeConte, Scolytus intricatus agrifolia Née, Quercus robur L., Sequoia Ratzeburg and Scolytus multistriatus sempervirens (D. Don) Endl., Thuja occidentalis L., Marsh, Phloeosinus serratus LeConte. Ulmus minor Mill, Ulmus laevis Pall, Juniperus G. langdoniiG. coahuilensis (Martínez) H. Gaussen ex R. P. Adams. Supplementary material Cryphalus pubescens Hopkins, Amygdalus communis (Prunus dulcis), Hypoborus ficus Erichson, Ips Chamaecyparis sp., Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link, plastographus LeConte, Monarthrum Ficus carica L., Juniperus occidentalis var. australis scutellare LeConte, Orthotomicus (Vasek) A.H. Holmgren & N.H. Holmgren, latidens LeConte, O. spinifer Juniperus virginia L., Juniperus occidentalis Hook, Eichhoff, Pityophthorus sp. Eichhoff, Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh., Olea europea Phloeotribus scarabaeoides Bernard, L., Pinus longaeva D.K. Bailey, Pinus sabiniana Phloeotribus rhododactylus Marsham, Douglas ex D. Don, Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Phloeosinus canadensis Swaine, Prunus sp. L., Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Phloeosinus cupressi Hopkins, Franco, Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl, Phloeosinus. Dentatus Say, Juniperus flaccida Schltdl. sp. 21 Phloeosinus punctatus LeConte, Phloeosinus sequoiae Hopkins, Phloetribus cristatus Fauvel, Pityophthorus sp. Eichhoff, Geosmithia Pityogenes knechtelim Swaine, Pseudips mexicanus Hopkins, Pseudopityophthorus pubipennis LeConte, Pseudothysanoes hopkinsi Blackman, Scolytus oregoni Blackman, and Scolytus rugulosus Müller, Phloesinus deleoni Blackman. G. xerotolerance wall of house .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Health of Colorado's Forests
    The Health of Colorado’s Forests Special Issue: Threats to Colorado’s Current and Future Forest Resources 2009 Report Acknowledgements William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo., and Aerial Survey Coordinator, Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS), is the primary author of the 2009 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests. Thanks to the following Colorado State Forest Service employees who served on the Report Working Group and/or provided information, guidance and feedback. Chuck Dennis, Special Projects Forester, Broomfield, Colo. Joe Duda, Forest Management Division Supervisor, Fort Collins, Colo. Jan Hackett, Policy and Legislative Affairs Specialist, Denver, Colo. Meg Halford, Assistant District Forester, Franktown District, Franktown, Colo. Ben Pfohl, Assistant District Forester, Boulder District, Longmont, Colo. Tim Reader, Utilization and Marketing Forester, Durango District, Durango, Colo. Kelly Rogers, District Forester, Grand Junction District, Grand Junction, Colo. Dr. S. Sky Stephens, Entomologist, Fort Collins, Colo. Thanks to those who reviewed and/or provided information for this report: Dr. Donald Bright, C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Biodiversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. Robert Cain, Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Dr. Tony Cheng, Director, Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo. Patricia M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colo. Brian Howell, Aerial Survey Program Manager, USDA Forest Service, Lakewood, Colo. Dr. Brian Kent, Research Forester, Human Uses, Economics, and Decision Sciences, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colo. Dave Leatherman, Entomologist, CSFS (retired), Fort Collins, Colo.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Alaska Entomological Society
    Newsletter of the Alaska Entomological Society Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2019 In this issue: Some food items of introduced Alaska blackfish (Dallia pectoralis T. H. Bean, 1880) in Kenai, Alaska8 Announcements . .1 Two new records of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) Arthropods potentially associated with spruce from Alaska . 11 (Picea spp.) in Interior Alaska . .2 Changes in soil fungal communities in response to A second Alaska record for Polix coloradella (Wals- invasion by Lumbricus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758 ingham, 1888) (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oe- at Stormy Lake, Nikiski, Alaska . 12 cophoridae), the “Skunk Moth” . .5 Review of the twelfth annual meeting . 19 Announcements New research to assess the risk of ticks tat suitability and probabilistic establishment model to dis- cover the climatic limits and probability of tick survival and tick-borne pathogens in Alaska in Alaska. For more information on ticks in Alaska and to learn how you can Submit-A-Tick, please visit: https: The geographic range of many tick species has expanded //dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/ticks (website is in develop- substantially due to changes in climate, land use, and an- ment) or contact Dr. Micah Hahn ([email protected]). imal and human movement. With Alaska trending to- wards longer summers and milder winters, there is grow- ing concern about ticks surviving further north. Recent th passive surveillance efforts in Alaska have revealed that 69 Western Forest Insect Work Confer- non-native ticks—some with significant medical and vet- ence erinary importance—are present in the state. There is a new collaborative effort between the University of Alaska, The 69th Western Forest Insect Work Conference will the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and the Of- be held April 22–25 2019 in Anchorage, Alaska at fice of the State Veterinarian to understand the risk of the Anchorage Marriott Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • In Interior Alaska Doi:10.7299/X7RR1ZJT “Populas, Picca” Changed to “Populus, Picea,” Abbrevia- Tions Like “Bl
    Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2019 2 Arthropods potentially associated with spruce (Picea spp.) in Interior Alaska doi:10.7299/X7RR1ZJT “Populas, Picca” changed to “Populus, Picea,” abbrevia- tions like “bl. spr.” were expanded to “black spruce,” etc. 1 by Derek S. Sikes I limited searches to interior Alaska which I defined by drawing a rectangle using the Google Map search tool Introduction in Arctos with the western edge on and including Kaltag, the southern edge just north of the northern boundary of While curating an enormous volume of specimens derived Denali National Park, the eastern edge on and including from an Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) Eagle Village, and the northern edge on and including Al- study on the breeding habitat of Olive-sided flycatchers lakaket. This search only finds records that have been geo- (Contopus cooperi) I began to notice a number of insect referenced with the center of their error radii inside this species that appeared new to the University of Alaska Mu- rectangle. Fortunately, most (90%) of UAM:Ento Arctos seum insect collection. This bird species breeds in spruce- records are georeferenced. This rectangle corresponds to rich habitats so I formed the a priori hypothesis that these the following coordinates (NE lat: 66.59602240341611, NE insect species likely preferred habitats with spruce. Per- long: -141.0853271484375, SW lat: 64.07155766950311, SW haps it was my upbringing in the primarily deciduous long: -158.7425537109375). forests of New England, and my association of tropical di- Searches were also limited to UAM:Ento specimens that versity with deciduous forests, that caused me to be bi- had been identified to species with ID formula = A (this un- ased against coniferous forests as a source of invertebrate fortunately eliminates ID formula A string records, which species richness, and thus led me to under-sample these includes all new / undescribed species, but was done to 2 habitats prior to this ADF&G study.
    [Show full text]
  • Infestations of the Cypress Bark Beetles Phloeosinus Rudis, P
    140 entomologische berichten 70 (4) 2010 Infestations of the cypress bark beetles Phloeosinus rudis, P. bicolor and P. thujae in The Netherlands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Leen G. Moraal KEY WORDS Cupressaceae, drought stress, invasive species, northwards shift, pest insects Entomologische Berichten 70 (4): 140-145 In the summer of 2004, hundreds of shrubs and trees of Cupressaceae in The Netherlands were killed by the Japanese cypress bark beetle, Phloeosinus rudis. Dead trees with larval galleries under the bark were observed in several cities near Rotterdam. The infestations of this invasive species occurred in old solitary Thuja trees as well as in younger plants of Thuja, Chamaecyparis and Juniperus in hedges. In the period 2005 until 2008, only few infestations were reported. It is suspected that P. rudis may have escaped from imported material from the harbour of Rotterdam. In addition, the Mediterranean cypress bark beetles Phloeosinus bicolor and Phloeosinus thujae were identified as well as the cause of death of many Cupressaceae on several locations in 2004. The latter two species are moving their range northwards. In the past, P. thujae has been reported a few times while P. bicolor was found for the first time in The Netherlands. It seems no coincidence that the three Phloeosinus species caused large scale attacks in the same year: the severe drought of 2003 possibly made the trees susceptible for bark beetles. For Western-Europe, the climate change models predict increasing summer drought and heat waves, which make trees vulnerable for secondary pest insects such as Phloeosinus species. In the future we may expect more trees to be weakened and by that, more infestations by secondary pests and diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • California Forest Insect and Disease Training Manual
    California Forest Insect and Disease Training Manual This document was created by US Forest Service, Region 5, Forest Health Protection and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest Pest Management forest health specialists. The following publications and references were used for guidance and supplemental text: Forest Insect and Disease Identification and Management (training manual). North Dakota Forest Service, US Forest Service, Region 1, Forest Health Protection, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation and Idaho Department of Lands. Forest Insects and Diseases, Natural Resources Institute. US Forest Service, Region 6, Forest Health Protection. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflets. USDA Forest Service Furniss, R.L., and Carolin, V.M. 1977. Western forest insects. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 1339. 654 p. Goheen, E.M. and E.A. Willhite. 2006. Field Guide to Common Disease and Insect Pests of Oregon and Washington Conifers. R6-NR-FID-PR-01-06. Portland, OR. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 327 p. M.L. Fairweather, McMillin, J., Rogers, T., Conklin, D. and B Fitzgibbon. 2006. Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of Arizona and New Mexico. USDA Forest Service. MB-R3-16-3. Pest Alerts. USDA Forest Service. Scharpf, R. F., tech coord. 1993. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers. USDA For. Serv. Ag. Hndbk. 521. 199 p.32, 58. Tree Notes Series. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Wood, D.L., T.W. Koerber, R.F. Scharpf and A.J. Storer, Pests of the Native California Conifers, California Natural History Series, University of California Press, 2003. Cover Photo: Don Owen. 1978. Yosemite Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia Spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus Spp
    Article Phylogenetic Position of Geosmithia spp. (Hypocreales) Living in Juniperus spp. Forests (Cupressaceae) with Bark Beetles of Phloeosinus spp. (Scolytinae) from the Northeast of Mexico Hernández-García Juan Alfredo 1,2,3 , Cuellar-Rodríguez Gerardo 1 , Aguirre-Ojeda Nallely Guadalupe 1, Villa-Tanaca Lourdes 2 , Hernández-Rodríguez César 2 and Armendáriz-Toledano Francisco 3,* 1 Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Carretera Nacional No. 85, Km. 145, Linares, Nuevo León C.P. 67700, Mexico; [email protected] (H.-G.J.A.); [email protected] (C.-R.G.); [email protected] (A.-O.N.G.) 2 Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, Mexico; [email protected] (V.-T.L.); [email protected] (H.-R.C.) 3 Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cto. Zona Deportiva S/N, Ciudad Universitaria. CDMX, Mexico C.P. 04510, Mexico * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-56-22-92-50 (ext. 47833) Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 28 October 2020 Abstract: Geosmithia members are mitosporic filamentous fungi commonly recorded and isolated from bark beetles of the Scolytinae subfamily and their respective host’s species. This genus includes 18 species formally described and 38 phylogenetic species recorded in several localities from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North and South America, where they exhibit frequent associations with phloeophagous and wood-boring bark beetles. Among phloephagous bark beetle species, specifically, in members of the genus Phloeosinus Chapuis, almost 10% of Geosmithia strains have been isolated.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Format
    Forest Disturbance Effects on Insect and Bird Communities: Insectivorous Birds in Coast Live Oak Woodlands and Leaf Litter Arthropods in the Sierra Nevada by Kyle Owen Apigian B.A. (Bowdoin College) 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in Charge: Professor Barbara Allen-Diaz, Chair Assistant Professor Scott Stephens Professor Wayne Sousa Spring 2005 The dissertation of Kyle Owen Apigian is approved: Chair Date Date Date University of California, Berkeley Spring 2005 Forest Disturbance Effects on Insect and Bird Communities: Insectivorous Birds in Coast Live Oak Woodlands and Leaf Litter Arthropods in the Sierra Nevada © 2005 by Kyle Owen Apigian TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures ii List of Tables iii Preface iv Acknowledgements Chapter 1: Foliar arthropod abundance in coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 1 woodlands: effects of tree species, seasonality, and “sudden oak death”. Chapter 2: Insectivorous birds change their foraging behavior in oak woodlands affected by Phytophthora ramorum (“sudden oak death”). Chapter 3: Cavity nesting birds in coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) woodlands impacted by Phytophthora ramorum: use of artificial nest boxes and arthropod delivery to nestlings. Chapter 4: Biodiversity of Coleoptera and other leaf litter arthropods and the importance of habitat structural features in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Chapter 5: Fire and fire surrogate treatment effects on leaf litter arthropods in a western Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Conclusions References Appendices LIST OF FIGURES Page Chapter 1 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Phloeosinus Cupressi, the Cypress Bark Beetle
    Phloeosinus cupressi, the Cypress Bark Beetle Forest and Timber Insects in New Zealand No. 3 Revised 2009 Based on R. Zondag (1976) Insect: Phloeosinus cupressi Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Fig. 1 - Cypress barkbeetle, male. Arrow indicates incomplete rows of tubercules. Fig. 2 - Cypress barkbeetle, female. Arrows indicate complete rows of tubercules. Type of injury The cypress barkbeetle breeds under the bark of dead and dying trees but is more often found under the bark of felled trees or in dead branches. The adults feed on the inner bark and also, when newly emerged, bore into small twigs, mining down the centre and leaving only a thin shell. Such attacked twigs break off. Fig. 3 - Workings of the cypress barkbeetle under the bark of Cupressus macrocarpa. The larval tunnels spread out from the central gallery made by the parent beetles. Hosts In New Zealand this species has been recorded breeding and feeding in Cupressus macrocarpa, C. arizonica (Arizona cypress), C. benthamii (Bentham cypress), and Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Lawson cypress), but twig boring only in Cupressus torulosa (Bhutan cypress); in California it has been recorded from Cupressus, Cryptomeria, Chamaecyparis, Thuja orientalis (Chinese arborvitae), T. plicata (western red cedar), Calocedrus decurrens (incense cedar), and Sequoia sempervirens (Coast redwood); and in Australia from Cupressus torulosa and Callitris (cypress pine), but these records do not always indicate whether this was breeding attack or twigboring. Distribution This barkbeetle from California has a wide distribution in the North Island but in the South Island it appears to be restricted to Nelson, Marlborough and Canterbury. Economic importance This insect is of minor importance as it does not kill trees or large branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Strategies of Invasive Bark Beetles and Borers Species
    insects Article Biological Strategies of Invasive Bark Beetles and Borers Species Denis A. Demidko 1,2,* , Natalia N. Demidko 3, Pavel V. Mikhaylov 2,* and Svetlana M. Sultson 2 1 Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, 50, bil. 28, Akademgorodok, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia 2 Scientific Laboratory of Forest Health, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarskii Rabochii Prospekt. 31, 660037 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Department of Medical and Biological Basics of Physical Education and Health Technologies, School of Physical Education, Sport and Tourism, Siberian Federal University, Svobodny ave. 79, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.A.D.); [email protected] (P.V.M.) Simple Summary: Biological invasions are one of the most critical problems today. Invaders have been damaging tree- and shrub-dominated ecosystems. Among these harmful species, a notable role belongs to bark beetles and borers. Extensive phytosanitary measures are needed to prevent their penetration into new regions. However, the lists of quarantine pests should be reasonably brief for more effective prevention of invasion of potentially harmful insects. Our goal is to reveal the set of biological traits of invasive bark beetles and borers that are currently known. We identified four invasion strategies. Inbred, the first one is characterized by inbreeding, parthenogenesis, polyvoltin- ism, xylomycetophagy, flightless males, polyphagy, to less extent by association with pathogenic fungi. For the second, polyphagous, typical traits are polyphagy, feeding on wood, high fecundity, distance sex pheromones presence, development for one year or more. The third strategy, intermediate, Citation: Demidko, D.A.; Demidko, possesses such features as mono- or olygophagy, feeding on inner-bark, short (one year or less) N.N.; Mikhaylov, P.V.; Sultson, S.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2009) Vol. 2 : 25-52 The Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) David MIFSUD1 & Miloš KNÍŽEK2 ABSTRACT. The bark beetle fauna of the Maltese Islands is reviewed, based on literature records and examination of collected material. A total of twenty-one species have been recorded of which seventeen species represent new records from the Maltese archipelago. These include Hylurgus micklitzi, Kissophagus hederae, Phloeosinus thujae, Liparthrum mori, Scolytus amygdali, Scolytus rugulosus, Scolytus sulcifrons, Pityogenes calcaratus, Orthotomicus erosus, Thamnurgus characiae, Coccotrypes dactyliperda, Crypturgus cylindricollis, Crypturgus numidicus, Xyleborinus saxesenii, Hypocryphalus scabricollis comb. nov., Hypothenemus eruditus and Hypothenemus leprieuri. The earlier citation of Scolytus scolytus is incorrect and should refer to S. sulcifrons whereas the citation of Cryphalus piceae is definitely incorrect due to the absence of its host-plants in Malta. Additionally, two species, Xyleborus ferrugineus and X. volvulus were collected alive on logs originating from Tropical Africa and intended for the timber industry. So far, there were no local records of establishment of these two species in Malta. KEY WORDS. Bark beetles, Malta, Scolytidae, new records. INTRODUCTION The Scolytidae, commonly referred to as bark beetles comprise some 6,000 described species world-wide (BRIGHT & SKIDMORE, 2002; KNÍŽEK & BEAVER, 2004). Most species breed in woody plants where they feed most commonly on the phloem, however few species are known from other plant parts, such as seeds, cones, fruit and the central pith of fallen leaves. Most species prefer dying or dead host material but some species are known to cause primary attacks on healthy host plants, often leading to mortality of the attacked host plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Richness and Variety of Life in Arizona's Ponderosa Pine Forest Type
    United States Department of Agriculture Species Richness and Variety of Life in Arizona’s Ponderosa Pine Forest Type David R. Patton, Richard W. Hofstetter, John D. Bailey and Mary Ann Benoit Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-332 December 2014 Patton, David R.; Hofstetter, Richard W.; Bailey, John D.; Benoit, Mary Ann. 2014. Species richness and variety of life in Arizona’s ponderosa pine forest type. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-332. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Species richness (SR) is a tool that managers can use to include diversity in planning and decision-making and is a convenient and useful way to characterize the first level of biological diversity. A richness list derived from existing inventories enhances a manager’s understanding of the complexity of the plant and animal communities they manage. Without a list of species, resource management decisions may have negative or unknown effects on all species occupying a forest type. Without abundance data, a common quantitative index for species diversity cannot be determined. However, SR data can include life his- tory information from published literature to enhance the SR value. This report provides an example of how inventory information can characterize the complexity of biological diversity in the ponderosa pine forest type in Arizona. The SR process broadly categorizes the number of plant and animal life forms to arrive at a composite species richness value. Common sense dictates that plants and animals exist in a biotic community because that community has sufficient resources to sustain life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
    Technical Bulletin 132 December 1938 The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Harold Rodney Dodge Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (Accepted for publication April 1938) - , The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Harold Rodney Dodge Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (Accepted for publication April 1938) CONTENTS Page Economic importance 3 Control measures 5 Natural control 6 Life history and habits 6 Galleries 10 Classification of the brood galleries or brood burrows 11 Field key to the Minnesota bark beetles 13 Morphological characters 16 Key to the genera known or likely to occur in Minnesota 16 Notes on the species 20 Scolytinae 20 Hylesinae 23 Micracinae 33 Ipinae 34 Bibliography 56 Index to species 59 The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Co/eoptera: Scolytidae) HAROLD RODNEY DODGE Since the beginning of this century our knowledge of the Scolytidae has increased greatly. In Swaine's catalog (1909) 191 species are recog- nized from America north of Mexico. In Leng's catalog (1920) 383 species are listed, and at present there are about 550 described species from the same territory. This great increase in our knowledge of the family is due nearly entirely to the writings of A. D. Hopkins, J. M. Swaine, and M. W. Blackman. To date, 64 species have been taken in Minnesota, and a number of others doubtless occur. The material upon which this bulletin is based is from the University of Minnesota insect collection, and specimens collected by the writer during the summer of 1936.
    [Show full text]