DOCSLIB.ORG

Implementation of International Commitments in Central and Eastern European Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implementation of International Commitments in Central and Eastern European Countries ‘On the Road to Kyiv’ Implementation of international commitments in Central and Eastern European countries CEEWEB May 2003 Contributors Bulgaria Green Balkans Croatia Jagoda Munic, Green Action Irma Popovic Tomislav Tomasevic Czech Republic Mojmir Vlasin, Ecological Institute Veronica of Czech Union for Nature Conservation Hungary Eszter Bokodi CEEWEB Klára Hajdu CEEWEB Anna Iványi CEEWEB András Krolopp CEEWEB Latvia Latvian Fund for Nature Lithuania Rūta Vaičiūnaitė, Lithuanian Fund for Nature Poland Andrzej Kepel, The Polish Society for Nature Protection "Salamandra" Przemysław Wylegała, The Polish Society for Nature Protection "Salamandra" Romania Márton Kelemen, Milvus Group Tamás Papp, Milvus Group Slovakia Dr. Jaromír Šíbl, BROZ (Regional Association for Nature Conservation and Sustainable Development) Slovenia Anamarija Slabe, Institute for Sustainable Development Ariana Lucija Tratar Supan, Institute for Sustainable Development Katja Poboljsaj, Herpetological Society Nejc Jogan, Biological Society The opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the policies or opinions of the REC. The REC assumes no liability, expressed or implied, arising out of the activities of any of its grantees. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...................................................................................... 6 BULGARIA.................................................................................................................................................. 13 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Physical-geographical description ........................................................................................................ 13 Short historical data .............................................................................................................................. 13 State of nature........................................................................................................................................... 14 Natural characteristics of the country.................................................................................................... 14 Priority areas in terms of nature conservation....................................................................................... 15 Threats and human impact .................................................................................................................... 16 Decision-making system in conservation policy and nature resource management................................. 16 State sector............................................................................................................................................ 16 NGO participation in the decision making system................................................................................ 17 International commitments ....................................................................................................................... 17 Short historical overview ...................................................................................................................... 17 International agreements and conventions and their ratification........................................................... 18 Evaluation of the conventions............................................................................................................... 19 Conclusion and recommendations ........................................................................................................ 24 CROATIA..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Situation of environmental NGOs in Croatia........................................................................................ 26 State of nature........................................................................................................................................... 27 The natural features of the country ....................................................................................................... 27 International Commitments....................................................................................................................... 30 Evaluation of the conventions............................................................................................................... 31 Conclusions........................................................................................................................................... 35 THE CZECH REPUBLIC............................................................................................................................. 36 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 36 State of Nature .......................................................................................................................................... 36 Fauna and flora ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Decision-making system............................................................................................................................ 38 Structure of nature conservation ........................................................................................................... 38 NGO participation in decision making process..................................................................................... 38 International Commitments....................................................................................................................... 39 Evaluation of the conventions............................................................................................................... 39 Conclusions and recommendations........................................................................................................... 45 ESTONIA ..................................................................................................................................................... 46 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 46 State of Nature .......................................................................................................................................... 46 Biological Diversity .............................................................................................................................. 46 Decision making system in Nature Conservation ..................................................................................... 49 NGO participation in decision making system .....................................................................................50 International Commitments....................................................................................................................... 50 State of the conventions ........................................................................................................................ 50 Evaluation of the conventions............................................................................................................... 52 Conclusions and recommendations....................................................................................................... 59 HUNGARY .................................................................................................................................................. 61 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 61 State of nature........................................................................................................................................... 61 Biological diversity............................................................................................................................... 62 Decision making system............................................................................................................................ 64 International Commitments....................................................................................................................... 65 Evaluation of the conventions............................................................................................................... 65 Conclusions........................................................................................................................................... 75 3 LATVIA........................................................................................................................................................77 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................77 State of nature ...........................................................................................................................................77
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysing Data on Protected Areas Work in Progress
    The OECD is developing a method to report a more detailed and harmonised account of countries’ terrestrial and marine protected areas. It applies a harmonised methodology to data from the World Database on Protected Areas. Analysing data on protected areas WORK IN PROGRESS CONTACT Head of Division Nathalie Girouard [email protected] Senior Economist Ivan Haščič [email protected] Statisticians Alexander Mackie [email protected] and Sarah Sentier [email protected] Communications Clara Tomasini [email protected] Image credits: Dormitor Park by Thomas Maluck, Flickr/CC licence. UNSDG. Perereca de folhagem Moisés Silva Lima Flickr/CC Licence. Icon TheNounProject.com http://oe.cd/env-data 2 December 2016 International goals Methodology THE WORLD DATABASE ON PROTECTED AREAS The OECD is developing an improved method to The OECD’s indicators are based on data Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) generate more detailed indicators on protected from the World Database on Protected Areas and its World Commission on Protected areas, both terrestrial and marine, for countries (WDPA), which is a geospatial database of Areas (WCPA). across the world. terrestrial and marine protected areas. The WDPA is updated monthly. It contains The WDPA is managed by the United information on more than 200 000 It applies a harmonised methodology to data Nations Environment Programme’s World protected areas. from the World Database on Protected Areas. Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) with support from the International CATEGORIES OF MANAGEMENT By 2020, conserve at least 10 per cent of coastal and The World Database on Protected Areas lists z Ia Strict Nature Reserve marine areas, consistent with national and international protected areas designated at national (IUCN z Ib Wilderness Area law and based on best available scientific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Wilderness Within IUCN
    Article for the International Journal of Wilderness, to be published in 2009 Defining wilderness in IUCN Nigel Dudley, Cyril F. Kormos, Harvey Locke and Vance G. Martin The IUCN protected area classification system describes and defines a suite of protected area categories and management approaches suitable for each category, ranging from strictly protected “no-go” reserves to landscape protection and non-industrial sustainable use areas. Wilderness has its own protected area category under IUCN’s classification system, Category Ib, which describes the key objectives of wilderness protection and, more importantly, identifies the limits of what is and is not acceptable in such areas. At the 2008 World Conservation Congress, a new edition of management guidelines for the IUCN categories (Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories, Dudley 2008) was published following long consultation. Guidance for wilderness protection is now more detailed and precise than in the previous 1994 edition, and as a result will help further the application of this category around the world. We describe the revisions to the new guidelines generally, and some of the implications for wilderness protected areas specifically. Wilderness areas and protected areas The term “wilderness” has several dimensions: a biological dimension, because wilderness refers to mainly ecologically intact areas, and a social dimension, because many people – from urban dwellers to indigenous groups – interact with wild nature, and all humans depend on our planet’s wilderness resource to varying degrees. A wilderness protected area is therefore an area that is mainly biologically intact, is free of modern, industrial infrastructure, and has been set aside so that humans may continue to have a relationship with wild nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasslands of Eastern Europe
    Grasslands of Eastern Europe Péter Török, MTA-DE Lendület Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary Iwona Dembicz, Botanical Garden Center for Biological Diversity Conservation in Powsin, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland Zora Dajic-Stevanovic, Department of Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Anna Kuzemko, M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This chapter was solicited and edited by Jürgen Dengler and Péter Török on behalf of the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG). Delimitation and Physiogeography 1 Origin and Biodiversity of Grasslands 2 Typology of Grasslands 3 Steppes and Steppe Grasslands in Forest Steppe Mosaics 4 Alpine Grasslands 5 Azonal and Extrazonal Grasslands 5 Coastal and inland saline grasslands 5 Sand steppes and coastal sand grasslands 5 Grasslands on shallow rocky substrates 5 Dry and Semi-Dry Grasslands 5 Mesic to Wet Grasslands 6 Ecology and Biodiversity Patterns 6 Ecosystem Services and Threats 7 Area Loss 7 Changes in Management: Intensification and Abandonment 7 Invasive Species Encroachment 8 Climate Change 8 Some Further Drivers of Grassland Biodiversity 8 Conservation, Sustainable Management and Restoration 8 Conservation 8 Sustainable Grassland Management and Restoration 9 Acknowledgments 9 References 9 Abstract Grasslands
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Plant Community on Recruitment of Pulsatilla Pratensis in Dry Grassland*
    EFFECT OF PLANT COMMUNITY ON RECRUITMENT OF PULSATILLA PRATENSIS IN DRY GRASSLAND* M. Bochenková1, M. Hejcman2, P. Karlík1 1Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Dendrology and Forest Breeding, Prague, Czech Republic 2Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Department of Ecology, Prague, Czech Republic The most critical life phase of many plant species is seedlings recruitment. We investigated emergence and survival of seed- lings of endangered Pulsatila pratensis subsp. bohemica on dry grassland close to Prague (Czech Republic). We asked: (1) How are the field emergence and survival of seedlings affected by different plant communities? (2) Is the in situ seeding of lo- cal seeds a perspective method for the reinforcement of the declining population? In May 2010, we selected plots with domi- nant Festuca pallens (Festuca treatment), Geranium sanguineum accompanied by Festuca rupicola (Geranium treatment), and plots without any vegetation (Control treatment) and sewed 1350 seeds of P. pratensis. In October 2010, field emergence was 1.7, 2.6, and 1.3% in Festuca, Geranium, and Control treatments. In March 2011, only 4 and 3 seedlings were recorded in Festuca and Control treatments and no seedlings survived in Geranium treatment. By the end of 2011, only one seedling was alive in Control treatment and this seedling survived till October 2012. We concluded that in situ seeding was not an effective method for reinforcement of P. pratensis populations because of very low emergence rate and following survival of seedlings. field emergence; germination; pasqueflower; steppe plant communities INTRODUCTION improved by the mycorrhizal colonization (M o o r a et al., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Histories of Protected Areas: Internationalisation of Conservationist Values and Their Adoption in the Netherlands Indies (Indonesia)
    Histories of Protected Areas: Internationalisation of Conservationist Values and their Adoption in the Netherlands Indies (Indonesia) PAUL JEPSON* AND ROBERT J. WHITTAKER School of Geography and the Environment University of Oxford Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TB, UK *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT National parks and wildlife sanctuaries are under threat both physically and as a social ideal in Indonesia following the collapse of the Suharto New Order regime (1967–1998). Opinion-makers perceive parks as representing elite special interest, constraining economic development and/or indigenous rights. We asked what was the original intention and who were the players behind the Netherlands Indies colonial government policy of establishing nature ‘monu- ments’ and wildlife sanctuaries. Based on a review of international conservation literature, three inter-related themes are explored: a) the emergence in the 1860– 1910 period of new worldviews on the human-nature relationship in western culture; b) the emergence of new conservation values and the translation of these into public policy goals, namely designation of protected areas and enforcement of wildlife legislation, by international lobbying networks of prominent men; and 3) the adoption of these policies by the Netherlands Indies government. This paper provides evidence that the root motivations of protected area policy are noble, namely: 1) a desire to preserve sites with special meaning for intellectual and aesthetic contemplation of nature; and 2) acceptance that the human conquest of nature carries with it a moral responsibility to ensure the survival of threatened life forms. Although these perspectives derive from elite society of the American East Coast and Western Europe at the end of the nineteenth century, they are international values to which civilised nations and societies aspire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Protection at Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2020 STEALTH SANCTUARY: THE CHALLENGE OF PROTECTION AT STELLWAGEN BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY Clea Harrelson University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Harrelson, Clea, "STEALTH SANCTUARY: THE CHALLENGE OF PROTECTION AT STELLWAGEN BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY" (2020). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1834. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1834 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STEALTH SANCTUARY: THE CHALLENGE OF PROTECTION AT STELLWAGEN BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY BY CLEA HARRELSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF THE ARTS IN MARINE AFFAIRS UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2020 MASTER OF ARTS IN MARINE AFFAIRS THESIS OF CLEA HARRELSON APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Amelia Moore Tracey Dalton Rod Mather Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2020 ABSTRACT Centuries of exploitation in marine areas have negatively impacted the biomass, diversity, and function of marine habitats and life on a global scale. Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly relied upon as a conservation strategy to address the degradation of marine resources in the U.S., but research on the social context that shapes protection of these marine spaces remains sparse. This study explores protection through the evolution of the people and groups who use the marine resources within MPAs and those who manage MPAs over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Rmk Annual Report 2018
    RMK ANNUAL REPORT 2018 RMK ANNUAL REPORT 2018 State Forest Management Centre (RMK) Sagadi Village, Haljala Municipality, 45403 Lääne-Viru County, Estonia Tel +372 676 7500 www.rmk.ee Text: Katre Ratassepp Translation: TABLE OF CONTENTS Interlex Design and layout: Dada AD 4 Aigar Kallas: Forever forested land www.dada.ee 36 Key biotypes 5 10 facts about RMK 37 Nature protection works Typography: Geogrotesque 40 Põlula fish farm News Gothic BT 6–13 About the organisation 8 All over Estonia 42–49 Visiting nature Paper: cover Constellation Snow Country 280 g 9 Structure and nature awareness content Munken Lynx 120 g 10 Staff 44 Visiting nature 11 Contribution to the economy 46 Nature awareness Printed by Ecoprint 12 Cooperation projects 46 Elistvere Animal Park 13 Recognition 47 Sagadi Forest Centre 48 Nature camera 14–31 Forest management 49 Christmas trees 16 Overview of the RMK forest 49 Heritage culture 19 RMK’s forestry works 24 Plant cultivation 50–55 Research 25 Timber marketing 52 Applied research 28 Forest improvement 55 Scholarships 29 Waste collection 30 Forest fires 56–60 Financial summary 31 Hunting 58 Balance sheet 60 Income statement 32–41 Nature protection 61 Auditor’s report 34 Protected areas 35 Protected species 63 Register of photographs FOREVER FORESTED LAND 5 6300 important tasks performed by RMK 1% people were employed in the state Aigar Kallas are growing forests, preserving natural forest during the course of the year. values, earning a profit for the state of RMK’s forest land Of those, approximately 700 Chairman of the Management Board of RMK through the management of the forest, is clear-cut each year.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Journal of Protected Areas and Conservation
    PARKS The International Journal of Protected Areas and Conservation Developing capacity for a protected planet Issue 19.1: March 2013 2 IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN DEFINES A PROTECTED AREA AS: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. The definition is expanded by six management categories VI Protected areas with sustainable use of natural (one with a sub-division), summarized below. resources: Areas which conserve ecosystems, together Ia Strict nature reserve: Strictly protected for biodiversity with associated cultural values and traditional natural and also possibly geological/ geomorphological features, resource management systems. Generally large, mainly in where human visitation, use and impacts are controlled a natural condition, with a proportion under sustainable and limited to ensure protection of the conservation natural resource management and where low-level non- values. industrial natural resource use compatible with nature Ib Wilderness area: Usually large unmodified or slightly conservation is seen as one of the main aims. modified areas, retaining their natural character and influence, without permanent or significant human The category should be based around the primary habitation, protected and managed to preserve their management objective(s), which should apply to at least natural condition. three-quarters of the protected area – the 75 per cent rule. II National park: Large natural or near-natural areas protecting large-scale ecological processes with characteristic species and ecosystems, which also have The management categories are applied with a typology of environmentally and culturally compatible spiritual, governance types – a description of who holds authority and scientific, educational, recreational and visitor responsibility for the protected area.
    [Show full text]
  • Juskiewicz Tuexenia 30 26.05.10 11:36 Seite 457
    Juskiewicz_Tuexenia 30 26.05.10 11:36 Seite 457 Tuexenia 30: 457–466. Göttingen 2010. Population structure of Pulsatilla patens in relation to the habitat quality – Barbara Juśkiewicz-Swaczyna – Abstract This paper presents a study on a population of Pulsatilla patens conducted in 2009 in the Natura 2000 wildlife refuge called “Grasslands in the Military Training Grounds in Orzysz” in the Masurian Lake District (NE Poland). The purpose of the study was to determine the population structure of Pul- satilla patens, especially with regard to abundance, density, and percentage of life cycle stages in the total population. Correlations were examined between these population features and selected environmental characteristics including cover of phanerogams, cryptogams, litter, and bare soil. For the evaluation of the linear relationship between the variables, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. In order to identify the factors that have significant influence on the values of the dependent variables, a multiple regression analysis was performed. In total, 316 individuals of Pulsatilla patens were recorded: 62 flower ing adults, 202 vegetative adults and 52 juveniles. The number of flowers per individual varied from one to 12, the average being three flowers. Most individuals occurred in dry heath, and the small- est number of individuals was found in pine forest. The mean density per habitat ranged from one to 11 individuals per 4 m2. Increased cover of phanerogams and cryptogams caused a decrease in the density of Pulsatilla patens individuals. Zusammenfassung: Populationstruktur von Pulsatilla patens in Abhängigkeit von der Habitatqualität Diese Veröffentlichung stellt die Forschungsergebnisse zur Population der Finger-Kuhschelle (Pulsa- tilla patens) dar, die 2009 in dem Natura-2000-Gebiet „Graslandgesellschaften auf dem Truppenübungs- platz Orzysz“ auf der Masurischen Seenplatte (NE Poland) durchgeführt wurden.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Nature Conservation in 2007
    Diversity of Nature in Estonia Estonian Nature Conservation in 2007 Diversity of Nature in Estonia ESTONIAN NATURE CONSERVATION IN 2007 Estonian Environment Information Centre Tallinn 2008 Published as 3rd book within series “Diversity of Nature in Estonia” Editor: Lauri Klein Compiled by: Taimo Aasma, Marika Arro, Lauri Klein, Reigo Roasto, Kaire Sirel, Margit Tennokene, Rene Volt, Hanno Zingel Photographs: Arne Ader, Mati Kose, Toomas Tuul, Lauri Klein, Heiko Kruusi, Reigo Roasto, Uudo Timm, Tiina Napp, Ingmar Muusikus Cover photo: Floodplain meadow at Suitsu. Matsalu National Park. Author: Mati Kose. Design by: Tõnis Kipper Printed by: Tallinna Raamatutrükikoja OÜ, Publisher: Laki 26, 12915 Tallinn, Estonia, www.trt.ee Printed on 100% recycled paper Cyclus Off set with environmentally friendly colours Copyright: Estonian Environment Estonian Environment Information Centre Information Centre, 2008 Mustmäe tee 33, 10616 Tallinn, Estonia Phone: +372 673 7577 Fax: +372 673 7599 ISSN 1406-2399 [email protected] ISBN 978-9985-881-54-5 (hard copy) www.keskkonnainfo.ee ISBN 978-9985-881-56-9 (online) 2 Foreword Dear reader, Th e book you are holding is an overview of Es- Th e purpose of this book is to provide a com- tonian nature conservation management in 2007 pact overview of Estonian nature conserva- – 16 years after the restoration of independence tion in its current state. Following accession to and three years after accession to the European international conventions, membership of the Union. It is in these most recent years of rapid European Union and updates to legal acts on economic development that nature conservation nature conservation, many innovations have been has become one of the top topics of discussion introduced in Estonian nature conservation, and a in Estonian society.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites DRAFT Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK July 2000 I >\~ l lUCN UNEP WCMC The World Conservation Union Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 Overview 1 2.0 Issues TO Consider 1 3.0 What IS Biodiversity? 2 4.0 Assessment methodology 3 5.0 Current World Heritage Sites 4 5.1 Criterion (IV) 4 5.2 World Heritage Sites IN Danger 4 5.3 Case Studies 5 6.0 Biogeographical Coverage 5 6.1 Udvardy Biogeographical Provinces 5 6.2 Bailey's Ecoregions 6 7.0 Key Prioritisation Programme Areas 6 7.1 WWF Global 200 Ecoregions 6 7.2 Centres of Plant Diversity (CPD) 6 7.3 Conservation International - Biodiversity Hotspots 7 7.4 Vavilov Centres of Plant Genetic Diversity 8 7.5 Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs) 8 8.0 Key Areas for Identified Species 9 8.1 Critically Endangered Taxa 9 8.2 Marine Turtles 9 9.0 Key Habitat Areas 1 9.1 Ramsar sites 11 9.2 Marine Biodiversity 1 9.3 Coral Reefs and Mangroves 1 10.0 Key Findings 12 11.0 Possible Future World Heritage Sites 13 12.0 Limitations of THE study 14 13.0 Conclusions AND Recommendations for Future Work 15 REFERENCES TABLES Table 1 .
    [Show full text]