DOCSLIB.ORG

View Issue As A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Issue As A LD813HF_FINAL.qxd:1308Lowdown 24/7/13 7:43 PM Page 1 VOLUME15 NUMBER 8 AUGUST 2013 The My administration is committed ❛❛to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. ❜❜ ——PRESIDENT OBAMA, January 26, 2009 Memo to Executive branch officials WRITTEN BY JIM HIGHTOWER PUBLISHER, PHILLIP FRAZER Both Bush & Obama have kept negotiations secret about this nuclearized NAFTA The Trans-Pacific Partnership is not about free trade. It’s a corporate coup d’état—against us! IN 2002, IT WAS REPORTED that British Prime Minister Stop making sense Tony Blair had told a friend an amusing tale about our man Imagine the uproar if President Obama and Congress tried to George W. Bush. It seems that the two of them and French pass a bill to outlaw such “preferential procurement” policies, sum- marily cancelling our democratic right to decide where to make pub- President Jacques Chirac had gotten into an economics lic purchases. I’d get pretty PO’d, wouldn’t you? And what if they also discussion, after which George supposedly confided to proposed that foreign corporations in Brunei, New Zealand, Vietnam, Tony that he was decidedly unimpressed with Jacques’ and other nations must be given the right to make the sale on any and all products purchased with our tax dollars? That’d set my hair views: “The problem with the French,” Bush scoffed, on fire! “is that they don’t have a word for ’entrepreneur.’” The American people would never stand for this brazen affront to our sovereignty, so I can assure you that Obama and Congress will ’s head has always been a no-fly-zone for factual definitely NOT be proposing any such thing. Not directly, that is. reality. However, what would boggle his mind even Instead, their hope is to tiptoe it around us. The nullification of more than the fact that we Americans filched that our people’s right to direct expenditures of our own tax dollars is word from the French, is the reality that government but one of the horror stories being quietly packed into a political- is not quite the entrepreneur-devouring ogre (Mon and-economic bombshell benignly labeled TPP —the Trans-Pacific dieu! George, another French word!) that Bush’s Partnership. cartoonish dogma paints it to be. Actually, govern- This thing is a supersized and nuclearized NAFTA, the 1994 trade ment-at-its-bestW can be an entrepreneur’s scam rammed through Congress by Bill Clinton, buddy. One surprising place to see this Wall Street’s Robert Rubin, and the entire buddyship at work is in one of the most corporate establishment. They promised mundane of government offices: that the “glories of globalization” would Procurement (i.e., the Department of shower prosperity across our land. Buying Stuff). They lied. Corporations got the Where does your mayor, gold. We got the shaft—thou- school board, governor, or any sands of factories closed, mil- other “public shopper” go to lions of middle-class jobs went purchase fixtures, food, furni- south, and the economies of ture, ferns, and whatnot? hundreds of towns and cities Where I live, various agencies (including Detroit) were hol- have Buy Austin, Buy Texas, lowed out. (Most Mexicans got Buy American, Buy Green, Buy the NAFTA shafta, too. US grain Sweatshop-Free, and other tar- traders like ADM dumped corn into geted policies that apply our tax dol- Mexico, wiping out millions of peas- lars to our values. This sensible idea has ant farmers’ livelihoods, and thousands swept across the country, most likely of local businesses were crushed when including where you live, and these agency pur- Walmart invaded with its Chinese-made wares.) chases add up to a big financial boost for start-ups, Twenty years later, the corporate gang that stuck us independents, women-owned, and other homegrown enterprises. with NAFTA is back, hoping to fool us with an even more destructive Rather than buying everything from Walmart or China (excuse the multinational deal. (This calls for another immortal quote from redundancy there)—thus shipping truckloads and boatloads of cash George W: “Fool me once, shame on—shame on you. Fool me—you out of our communities—plow that public money back into the home can’t get fooled again.” Well, you know what he meant). turf for grassroots economic growth and the flowering of local jobs. This time we really must pay attention, because TPP is not just LD813HF_FINAL.qxd:1308Lowdown 24/7/13 7:43 PM Page 2 THE PEOPLE GET WISE 2| Hightower Lowdown August 2013 TO DEALS LIKE NAFTA another trade deal. First, it is massive and open-ended. would be strong incentives for corporate chieftains It would hitch us immediately to 11 Pacific Rim nations to export even more of our middle-class jobs. MOST OF America’s corpo- (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Drug prices. Big Pharma would be given more years rate, political, and media Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam), of monopoly pricing on each of their patents and be cognoscenti are street- and its door would remain wide open to lure China, empowered to block distribution of cheaper generic preaching proselytizers of Indonesia, Russia, and other nations to come in. drugs. Besides artificially keeping everyone’s prices the holy virtues of NAFTA- Second, note that many of those countries already high, this would be a death sentence to many peo- style trade deals. have trade agreements with the US. Hence, THIS ple suffering from cancer, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, But the people (damn AMAZING FACT: TPP is a “trade deal” that mostly and other treatable diseases in impoverished lands. them) are not buying the does not deal with trade. In fact, of the 29 chapters The deal would also restrict the rights of our govern- hokum. In fact, they now in this document, only five cover traditional trade ment to negotiate with drug giants to get lower con- consider NAFTA to be a five- matters! sumer prices with bulk purchases, as Medicare and letter profanity. Last year, The other two dozen chapters amount to a devilish Medicaid do in the US. the Angus Reid polling firm “partnership” for corporate protectionism. They cre- Banksters. Wall Street and the financial giants in ate sweeping new “rights” and escape hatches to pro- found that only one in four other TPP countries would make out like bandits: tect multinational corporations from accountability to Americans thinks that NAFTA The deal explicitly prohibits transaction taxes (such our governments… and to us. Here are a few of TPP’s has benefited workers, and as the proposed Robin Hood Tax here) that would provisos that would make our daily lives riskier, poorer, shut down super-rich speculators who have repeat- more than half of those and less free: polled believe the trade deal edly triggered financial crises and economic crashes Food safety. Any of our government’s food safety is so bad that the US should around the world; it restricts “firewall” reforms that regulations (on pesticide levels, bacterial contamina- either “renegotiate” or sim- separate consumer banking from risky investment tion, fecal exposure, toxic additives, GMOs, non-edi- banking (thus prohibiting Congress from reinstating ply “leave” NAFTA. ble fillers, etc.) that are stricter than “international the much needed Glass-Steagall firewall in our coun- Likewise, just before the standards,” as most are, could be ruled as “illegal try); it could roll back reforms that governments 2010 congressional elec- trade barriers.” Then our government would have to adopted to fix the extreme bank-deregulation regi- tions, an NBC-Wall Street revise our consumer protections to comply with the men that caused Wall Street’s 2007 crash; and it Journal poll showed that 69 weaker global standards. Also, our government provides a backdoor escape from national rules that percent of voters believed could no longer ban meat imports that don’t meet would limit the size of “too-big-to-fail” behemoths. that “free trade agree- our safe-to-eat laws, as long as the exporting nation These extreme provisions would be enforceable by ments… cost the US jobs.” simply claims that its inspection system is “equiva- the banks themselves—TPP empowers them to Even 61 percent of self-iden- lent” to ours. In addition, food labeling laws we rely force governments either to repeal reform laws tified tea partiers agree. A on (organic, country-of-origin, animal-welfare or to compensate banks with taxpayer money for whopping 86 percent of us approved, GMO-free, etc.) would also be subject to “losses” they say are caused by reforms. said corporate outsourcing challenge as trade barriers. Internet freedom. Thanks to public rebellion, cor- of our jobs to low-wage Fracking. Our Department of Energy would lose porations hoping to lock up and monopolize the inter- countries was the top cause its authority to regulate exports of natural gas to net failed in Congress last year to pass their repres- of America’s economic woes. any TPP nation. This would create an explosion of sive “Stop Online Piracy Act.” However, they’ve A 2011 poll by the Mellman the destructive fracking process across our land, slipped SOPA’s most pernicious provisions into TPP. Group found that 95 percent for both foreign and US corporations could export Corporate-created content, for example, would be of Americans agreed that fracked gas from America to member nations with- given copyright protection for a stunning 120 years! we should “keep America’s out any DOE review of the environmental and eco- The deal would also transform internet service trade laws strong and nomic impacts on local communities—or on our providers into a private, Big Brother police force, strictly enforced to provide national interests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Low Turnout in American Elections David Hill Bridgewater State College
    Bridgewater Review Volume 20 | Issue 1 Article 5 Jun-2001 Low Turnout in American Elections David Hill Bridgewater State College Recommended Citation Hill, David (2001). Low Turnout in American Elections. Bridgewater Review, 20(1), 3-7. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol20/iss1/5 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. One aspect of the election, however, was remarkably simi­ lar to past elections. As with every presidential election since 1972 only about half of the eligible citizens actually cast a ballot. While final vote totals have yet to be confirmed by the Federal Election Commission, most estimates indicate turnout nationwide was somewhere between 50 and 52%, which is a modest increase over the 49% rate in 1996 (the lowest since 1924). While turnout indeed increased, this by no means suggests American democracy is on the mend. 2000 is simply another in a long line of low turnout elections since 1972. Given the closeness of the election, the low turnout is surprising. With so much in the balance and the intense focus of the media on the closeness of the election one would expect citizens to show up and participate in order to make a difference. Once again, however, students Low TURNOUT of political participation are left asking, why is turnout in American elections so low? In order to understand participation rates in the United IN AMERICAN States one must compare our turnout with that of other comparable democracies (See Figure 1) . Between 1960 and ELECTIONS 1995 turnout in 24 democracies without mandatory voting averaged 80% .
    [Show full text]
  • April 2010 Quarterly Program Topic Report
    April 2010 Quarterly Program Topic Report Category: Aging NOLA: SMIT 000000 Series Title: Smitten Length: 30 minutes Airdate: 4/19/2010 1:30:00 AM Service: PBS Format: Other Segment Length: 00:26:46 Meet Rene: at age 85, this unusual art collector continues to search for the work of northern California artists, hoping to make his next great discovery. SMITTEN follows Rene as he opens his private collection to the public, displaying the work without wall labels, so that people are empowered to interact with the art in a direct, personal, and more democratic way. Category: Agriculture NOLA: NOVA 003603 Series Title: NOVA Episode Title: Rat Attack Length: 60 minutes Airdate: 4/4/2010 12:00:00 PM Service: PBS Format: Documentary Segment Length: 00:56:46 Every 48 years, the inhabitants of the remote Indian state of Mizoram suffer a horrendous ordeal known locally as mautam. An indigenous species of bamboo, blanketing 30 percent of Mizoram's 8,100 square miles, blooms once every half-century, spurring an explosion in the rat population which feeds off the bamboo's fruit. The rats run amok, destroying crops and precipitating a crippling famine throughout Mizoram. NOVA follows this gripping tale of nature's capacity to engender human suffering, and investigates the botanical mystery of why the bamboo flowers and why the rats attack with clockwork precision every half-century. Category: Agriculture NOLA: AMDO 002301 Series Title: POV Episode Title: Food, Inc. Length: 120 minutes Airdate: 4/21/2010 8:00:00 PM Service: PBS Format: Documentary Segment Length: 01:56:46 In Food, Inc., filmmaker Robert Kenner lifts the veil on our nation's food industry, exposing the highly mechanized underbelly that's been hidden from the American consumer with the consent of our government's regulatory agencies, USDA and FDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorable Lobbyists” Would Run Mccain’S White House
    *0808Lowdown_final.qxd 7/25/08 5:43 PM Page 1 The “I don’t know if I would want him for vice-president. He and I have the same strengths. But to serve in other capacities? Hell, yeah.” —— JOHN MCCAIN, when asked if he’d consider DICK CHENEY for a position LOWDOWN in a McCain administration Edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer Vol.10 No.8 August 2008 Even though a few of them have been dumped from the campaign Heartless Phil and “honorable lobbyists” would run McCain’s White House HE POLITICAL MEDIA ESTABLISHMENT is enraptured by John McCain. Mainline media sparklies, as well as the blatherers on the Fox channel, routinely buff up his image as a straight-talking, maverick foe of Washington’s special interests. “The press loves McCain. We’re his base,” gushes MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. But if the senator really is the feared reformer of business-as-usual government, why does This presidential campaign look like the back alley of K Street? Many a president has had certain supporters behind him whom lobbyists, executives, and fund-raisers who are shaping his policies… he should have moved out in front in order to keep an eye on them. and expecting to walk right into the White House with him. McCain, however, isn’t even bothering to keep his self-interested There was a hilarious dustup in May when two of the campaign’s backers in the shadows—he has literally put them in charge of his cam- key operatives were publicly fingered as lobbyists for the totalitarian paign.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting “Progress” Back in Progressive the Route to Social Justice, Fair Food and a Sustainable Environment
    Putting “Progress” Back In Progressive The route to social justice, fair food and a sustainable environment By Jim Hightower Bridge to an Organic Future The 27th National Pesticide Forum April 2009, Carrboro, NC Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public Opportunity for change speaker, and author, Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish What we have won in 2008 is not merely the White House. It is Can Go With The Flow The following article is transcribed from the opportunity for change. That is what we achieved, last year. Jim Hightower’s keynote talk at Bridge to an Organic Future, the Not the change itself, but the chance to make change. I know that 27th National Pesticide Forum. The conference was sponsored you know that this is not easily done. The powers-that-be on Wall by Beyond Pesticides, Toxic Free North Carolina and numerous Street and in Washington is kind of redundant these days, isn’t it? local, state and regional organizations. To watch video footage of They get to think that they are the top dogs and we are a bunch this talk, as well as other Forum presentations from 2006 to the of fire hydrants out here in the countryside. That is why I am so present, visit www.beyondpesticides.org/forum/video. pleased to come over here to the Triangle area to be with those of you who are genuine change agents, those of you who have been hank you for allowing a scruffy Texas populist to come on the front lines of democracy all these years, challenging the here and be a part of your deliberations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected
    In the Shadow of Trump: How the 2016 Presidential Contest Affected House and Senate Primaries Prepared for the 2017 State of the Parties Conference, Akron, Ohio Robert G. Boatright, Clark University [email protected] The presidential race did not quite monopolize all of the uncivil or bizarre moments of the summer of 2016. One of the more interesting exchanges took place in Arizona in August of 2016, during the weeks before the state’s Senate primary election. Senator John McCain, always a somewhat unpredictable politician, has had difficulties in his last two primaries. Perhaps because he was perceived as having strayed too far toward the political center, or perhaps simply because his presidential bid had created some distance between McCain and Arizonans, he faced a vigorous challenge in 2010 from conservative talk show host and former Congressman J. D. Hayworth. McCain ultimately beat back Hayworth’s challenge, 56 percent to 32 percent, but only after a bitter campaign in which McCain spent a total of over $21 million and abandoned much of his “maverick” positioning and presented himself as a staunch conservative and a fierce opponent of illegal immigration (Steinhauer 2010). His task was made easier by his ability to attack Hayworth’s own checkered career in Congress. In 2016, McCain again faced a competitive primary opponent, physician, Tea Party activist, and two-term State Senator Kelli Ward. Ward, like Hayworth, argued that McCain was not conservative enough for Arizona. Ward was (and is), however, a decade younger than Hayworth, and her shorter tenure in political office made it harder for McCain to attack her.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History Interview FRED HARRIS
    An Oral History Interview With FRED HARRIS (part 2) conducted by Julie Ferdon Albuquerque, New Mexico May 9, 2000 transcribed by Jardee Transcription, Tucson The Morris K. Udall Oral History Project University of Arizona Library, Special Collections ©2000 The University of Arizona Library Arizona Board of Regents All Rights Reserved Fred Harris Fred Harris represented Oklahoma in the United States Senate from 1964-73. In 1976 he sought the Democratic presidential nomination as a populist candidate. Like Morris K. Udall, he was unsuccessful. Following the 1976 campaign Harris joined the faculty of the University of New Mexico where he teaches political science. He is the author of several books, including two mystery novels. JF: Okay, this is Side 2. You mentioned in your 1976 book, Potomac Fever, that by 1974 you had begun seriously thinking about running for president again. At that time, your friend Fritz Mondale was considering running. Did you ever discuss with him your plans to run? FH: No, not in advance. What I did do was to--I wrote a four-page memo, single-spaced, addressed to Mondale about how I thought he ought to run for president in 1976, and how he ought to go about it, in a populist way with populist issues, staying in people's homes and so forth. And by the time I had that finished, he'd already pretty much decided he was not going to run, according to reports, and I had a couple of friends of mine read it, one of whom was Jim Hightower--who was later to become my campaign manager, and then commissioner of Agriculture, now a radio commentator--and he said, "Well, why don't you do that yourself?" And so I reworked the beginning of it and made it, rather than a memo to Mondale, a sort of statement of my own, about how I was thinking about doing it, and began to circulate it and decided then to run for president myself.
    [Show full text]
  • \I\Brkers Cheer for Gore~~~~~~~~~~
    Hrade~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Uva-Rllc) (.1- d Car r IHE FAIR Trade Caravan moves out this Labor Day week- end on a seven-week tour to spread the truth about George Bush's proposed North Ameri- can Free Trade Agreement. The California Economic Eathquake Express includes tree huge trucks that serve as stages and Vol. 35-No. 32 September 4, 1992 display platforms for speakers, en- cob,4 tertainers and exhibits showing te social and economic chaos that will result if Bush's trade agreement is rtified. \I\brkers Cheer for Gore~~~~~~~~~~ Motorhomes and vans will carry representatives of the coalition of organizations allied with labor in Al Gore toured an Oakeland foun- opposition to the trade agreefnent. dry that is holding its own against Included will be environmentalists, cheap foreign labor Monday and community activists, clergy and drew cheers from union members Mexican workers who have experi- when he promised that a Clinton enced'exploitation and hoffendous -Administration will curb unfair living conditions in maquiladora competition by China. plants along the border, and unem- The vice presidential candidate ployed Americans whose jobs have cited American Brass and Iron Co. been exported.- as proof that Americans'don't have The agreement would allow U.S. to choose between jobs and the companies to fire their American environment. workers and ship jobs to Mexico in He told workers, civic officials search of sub-poverty wages and and labor leaders that Allan freedom from environmental and Boscacci, president of ABI, "has health and safety controls. looked upon environmental protec- "Earthquake"' in the caravan title tion as a business opportunity," refers to the devastation that will come with vast new inlcreases in un- AFL-CIO General Board employment and loss of tax base.
    [Show full text]
  • IN THIS ISSUE the Southern California Grocery Strike Kerry Or
    Vol. XXXI, No. 4 Spring 2004 IN THIS ISSUE The Southern California Grocery Strike Kerry or Nader: Avoiding Left Divisiveness Capturing the Middle Way: A View from Britain plus Remembering Mildred Jeffrey Lesson from a Local • Book Reviews The Southern California Grocery Strike By Herbert Shore For twenty weeks, from mid-October 2003 to early porations. As the strike March 2004, sixty thousand grocery workers walked wore on, it became picket lines in Southern California. Up for reneweal clear that the chains were the labor contracts between the United Food and were willing to suffer Commercial Workers’ Union (UFCW) and the three large local losses and major supermarket chains,Vons, Ralphs, and Albertsons. endure a long Management demanded large employee contributions strike/lockout. to health care coverage, reduction in pension benefits, At least in San and a two-tiered system in which new employees would Diego, UFCW was very have lower salaries and benefits than existing employ- concerned with not ees.In brief,unionized supermarket clerking would over alienating customers time be converted from a middle class occupation to a and the general public. “working poor” occupation. The union went on strike Picketers were instruct- only at Vons, but immediately management at the two ed to be polite and non- other chains locked out their employees. confrontational. This Since at least 1978,. relations between UFCW,man- concern was strength- PHOTO COURTESY OF UFCW agement and workers had been quite good and salaries ened in late October when disastrous fires throughout and benefits permitted grocery workers some middle Southern California destroyed thousands of homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Watch
    In This Issue: Congress Watch .......... 1 Vernon Township ..... 10 Dold Stealthily Votes to Restrain a Hightower ..................... 1 Occupy ....................... 11 Why I Vote ................... 7 Democracy ................ 12 Governing 101 ................. 8 Yes, We Did! ............. 13 Woman’s Right to Choose by Barbara Altman Dold ............................... 9 Feat of Clay ............... 14 Lately, Republican leaders in Congress have For information or to volunteer: been talking about jobs and the economy. But Email us at [email protected] their legislative agenda focuses on neither. Or visit our website at www.tenthdems.org Rather, Republicans have been escalating the Or call us at 847.266.VOTE (8683) Or write to Hon. Lauren Beth Gash, Chair, culture wars, most recently passing legislation Tenth Dems, P.O. Box 523, Deerfield, IL 60015 to limit a woman’s ability to make decisions about her healthcare and to obtain needed Editors: Barbara Altman, Susan Friedman, Allan Sperling emergency services. Editorial Staff: Jack Altschuler, Joan Attenberg, Eleonora di Liscia, Hon. Lauren Freshman Republican Congressman Robert Dold Republican does not represent the 10th District. Beth Gash, Adrienne Kirshbaum, Ron is no exception. On October 13, the Republican Robert Dold cast his vote for his Party, not for his Levitsky, Leslie Lipschultz, Mike Lofstrom, House passed, on an almost exclusively Illinois 10th District constituents. Kimberly Rodriguez, Steve Sheffey party-line vote, a bill to radically curtail Design: Sean Kealey On October 13, Dold joined 250 other Republicans women’s access to safe and legal abortions. Photo credits: Hightower Event - Ravi in supporting H.R. 358, which NARAL Pro-Choice Although one of the two lone Republicans Ganapathy, Occupy Wall Street - Henry Torres America, among others, has aptly dubbed the “Let who joined 172 Democrats in voting against Distribution: Ravi Ganapathy, Glenn Stier Women Die” bill.
    [Show full text]
  • They're Stealing Our Country, and It's Time to Take It Back
    04-179 (36a) Ch 36 6/17/04 6:51 AM Page 411 • 36 • Thieves in High Places: They’re Stealing Our Country, and It’s Time to Take It Back Jim Hightower A bout a year ago, I saw a bumper sticker on a pickup truck in Austin, Texas,that said: “Where are we going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?” Most people in the country, I find, have a strong sense that something funda- mental is happening here, something that is bad for them and bad for our country. I think we’re in another of those “when in the course of human events” moments that Jefferson wrote about, a moment in which it’s not King George III in England, it’s not royalty, but global corporate power that is usurping our democracy and usurp- ing decision-making over every aspect of our lives. The founding ethic of the common good is the idea that we’re all in this to- gether. But the conservatives are supplanting the ethic with a new ethic of greed that says: I’ve got mine; you get yours; never give a sucker an even break; caveat emptor; I’m rich and you’re not; adios, chump. That’s pretty much what it comes down to. They’re separating the good fortune of the few from the needed fortune of the many. We see it in plutocratic actions that they take: There is the tax giveaway, more than a trillion dollars now to the top one percent of wealth-earners in our country, at the same time they provide zero to the twelve million children of working fami- lies who do indeed pay income tax.
    [Show full text]
  • “Progressive,” We Need a Real Populist Movement
    1006Lowdown_final.qxd 6/4/10 6:16 PM Page 1 VOLUME12 NUMBER 6 JUNE 2010 The ❛❛Wall Street owns the country. It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street.❜❜ ——MARY ELLEN LEASE, lecturer, writer, and LOWDOWN political activist, advocate of women’s EDITED BY JIM HIGHTOWER AND PHILLIP FRAZER suffrage, Kansas Populist, a speech in 1890 Populism is not about mobs, anti-government rants, or opinion polls To put the progress back in “progressive,” we need a real populist movement IF A POLITICAL POLLSTER came to my door and asked themselves conservatives or liberals. whether I consider myself a conservative or a liberal, For me, the “ism” that best encompasses and addresses this reality is populism. What is it? Essentially, it’s the continuation of I’d answer, “No.” America’s democratic revolution. It encompasses and extends the ot to be cute—I have a bit of both in me—but because, like creation of a government that is us. Instead of a “trickle down” most Americans, my beliefs can’t be squeezed into either of approach to public policy, populism is solidly grounded in a “percolate the tidy little boxes that the establishment provides. up” philosophy that springs directly from America’s founding princi- Also, most of the big issues that our country faces defy ple of the Common Good. Nright-left categorization. Take conservatism. It’s a doctrine Few people today call themselves populists, but I think most are.
    [Show full text]
  • Eorge Bush's Son Claims Ather Holds Edge in Texas
    5? 87 Mo. 179 8 Pages The BattalionThursday, July 21, 1988 College Station, Texas eorge Bush’s son claims U.N. group will work on details ather holds edge in Texas of peace treaty By Alan Sembera Staf f Writer UNITED NATIONS — The said, he will announce a starting date The Vice President’s oldest Bush’s son not bothered by attacks U.N. secretary-general said Wednes­ “promptly” and set dates for troop on, George W. Bush, said at a day he is sending a team to Iran and withdrawal, prisoner exchange, Iraq to work out details of a cease­ peace negotiations and the investiga­ jrief campaign stop in College AUSTIN (AP) — George W. Bush, kicking off a “I’m really not worried about those kind of sarcastic fire and will announce a starting tion of responsibility for the war. itation Wednesday that Demo- Texas campaign tour for his father’s presidential bid, remarks because people wall see that George Bush date soon. Iraq proposed direct talks When the cease-fire takes effect, :ratic candidate Michael Dukakis’ Wednesday said he isn’t bothered by the personal na­ fought for his country, and George Bush built a busi­ between the belligerents. Perez de Cuellar said, he will send :hoice of Texas Sen. Loyd Bent- ture of attacks on the vice president at this week’s Dem­ ness in Odessa and Midland, out there in the oilfields,” Javier Perez de Cuellar, the secre­ up to 250 military observers into the ien as his running mate will not ocratic National Convention. the younger Bush said.
    [Show full text]