Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault on the Civilizing Mission Ideology Author(s): Michael Adas Source: Journal of World History , Mar., 2004, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Mar., 2004), pp. 31-63 Published by: University of Hawai'i Press on behalf of World History Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/20079260 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms University of Hawai'i Press and World History Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of World History This content downloaded from 130.56.64.101 on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 01:39:01 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Contested Hegemony: The Great War and the Afro-Asian Assault on the Civilizing Mission Ideology MICHAEL ADAS Rutgers University The civilizing which late nineteenth mission century has Europeans been traditionallyrationalized their colo seen as an ideology by nial domination of the rest of humankind. Formulations of this ideol ogy varied widely from those of thinkers or colonial administrators who stressed the internal pacification and political order that European col onization extended to "barbaric" and "savage" peoples suffering from incessant warfare and despotic rule, to those of missionaries and reform ers who saw religious conversion and education as the keys to European efforts to "uplift" ignorant and backward peoples.