CJ-September-2020-Reduced.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc. -
Kilpatrick Stockton's Cal Cunningham Receives Gen. Douglas Macarthur Leadership Award at Pentagon Ceremony
Kilpatrick Stockton's Cal Cunningham Receives Gen. Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award at Pentagon Ceremony WINSTON-SALEM (June 10) -- Kilpatrick Stockton announced today that litigation attorney Cal Cunningham was recently presented with the Army’s top leadership award, the Gen. Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award, at a ceremony held at the Pentagon. Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey presented the MacArthur Award, a 15- pound bronze bust of the general, to 28 company-grade officers of all three Army components. Each officer was awarded for exhibiting outstanding military performance, leadership and achievement, and for reflecting the ideals for which Gen. MacArthur stood - duty, honor, and country. Mr. Cunningham was one of seven Army Reserve officers to receive this year’s award. In the 25 years that the award has been given, only two other attorneys have been selected. “These award winners demonstrate the tremendous quality that we are privileged to have throughout our Army,” said Gen. George Casey at the awards ceremony. “These are top performers that have led in the most difficult and dangerous missions and brought out the best in the men and women they led.” Earlier this year, Mr. Cunningham received the Bronze Star while serving in Iraq as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom. A captain and paratrooper in the U.S. Army Reserves, Mr. Cunningham received the medal for “exceptionally meritorious service to the United States” as the senior trial counsel in the Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, Multi-National Corps-Iraq, at Camp Victory in Iraq from December 15, 2007 to November 19, 2008. -
CHC Task Force Meeting November 20, 2020 Zoom Help
CHC Task Force Meeting November 20, 2020 Zoom Help You can also send questions through Chat. Send questions to Everyone or a specific person. Everyone will be muted. You can unmute yourself to ask questions by clicking on the microphone or phone button. Agenda • Welcome, Chris Shank, President & CEO, NCCHCA • Election Debrief, Harry Kaplan & Jeff Barnhart, McGuireWoods Consulting • 2021 Policy Priorities, Brendan Riley, Director of Policy, NCCHCA • Experience with Carolina Access, Daphne Betts-Hemby, CFO, Kinston Community Health Center • Updates, Shannon Dowler, MD, NC Division of Health Benefits • Wrap-Up Slides & Other Info will be available on our website: www.ncchca.org/covid-19/covid19-general-information/ Welcome from Chris Shank, President & CEO, NCCHCA North Carolina Election Recap November 18, 2020 McGuireWoods | 5 CONFIDENTIAL THE COUNT McGuireWoods Consulting | 6 CONFIDENTIAL VOTER TURNOUT In North Carolina… ✓ 5,545,859 voters ✓ 75.4% of registered voters cast a ballot ✓4,629,200 of voters voted early ✓ 916,659 voted on Election Day ✓ Voter turnout increased about 6% over 2016 McGuireWoods Consulting | 7 CONFIDENTIAL FEDERAL RACES McGuireWoods Consulting | 8 CONFIDENTIAL FEDERAL RACES ✓ US PRESIDENT President Donald Trump (R) Former Vice President Joe Biden INCUMBENT (D) 2,758,776 (49.93%) 2,684,303 (48.59%) ✓ US SENATE Cal Cunningham (D) Thom Tillis (R) 2,569,972 (46.94%) INCUMBENT 2,665,605(48.69%) McGuireWoods | 9 CONFIDENTIAL FEDERAL RACES US HOUSE Virginia Foxx (R)- INCUMBENT- 66.93% ✓ DISTRICT 9: David Brown (D)- 31.11% -
Poll: October 2020
MEREDITH POLL: OCTOBER 2020 An in-depth examination of North Carolina voter attitudes on important current issues Registered Voters in North Carolina Date 10/16-10/19, 2020 1 MEREDITH POLL: OCTOBER 2020 Contents Key Insights 3 Key Matchups 3 Approval 5 Key Issues 5 Satisfaction 7 Topline Results 8 Satisfaction 8 Satisfaction with the way things are going in the United States today 8 Satisfaction with the way things are going in the North Carolina today 8 Issues 8 Safety 8 COVID-19 9 Stimulus Package 10 Health Care 11 Approval of Political Leaders 12 President 12 Governor 12 Senator 12 Electoral Matchups 13 Trump v. Biden 13 Tillis v. Cunningham 14 Cooper v. Forest 16 Cross-tabulations 17 Direction of the Country 17 Direction of the state 18 Issues 20 Safety 20 COVID-19 Pandemic Response 22 Economic Stimulus 29 Health Care 31 Approval of Political Leaders 36 2 MEREDITH POLL: OCTOBER 2020 President 36 Governor 38 Senator 40 Elections 42 Trump v. Biden 42 Tillis v. Cunningham 44 Cooper v. Forest 46 Methodological Information 48 Key Insights The Meredith Poll conducted a survey of North Carolina registered voters. The online sample — from Dynata— used a census quota before the questionnaire was administered. We used screening questions to produce a sample of likely voters. After the survey was completed, we weighted the sample for race, education, party affiliation, and location. The sample had 732 respondents, giving us a confidence interval of +/- 3.5%. The survey was in the field October 16-19, 2020. Key Matchups Biden v. Trump Our results indicate that Joe Biden has opened a slight lead over Donald Trump (48.1 to 44%) with a small number of voters undecided (4.4%) about two weeks before Election Day. -
Meredith College Poll Report Oct 2019
MEREDITH POLL: FALL 2019 POLITICAL MATCHUPS AND POLICY An in-depth examination of North Carolina voter attitudes on important current issues Registered Voters in North Carolina Date 9/29-10/7, 2019 1 MEREDITH POLL: FALL 2019 POLITICAL MATCHUPS AND POLICY Contents Key Insights ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Satisfaction with the direction of the country ......................................................................................................... 4 Satisfaction with the direction of North Carolina .................................................................................................. 4 Economic Conditions in the US and Fear of Recession within a Year ........................................................... 4 Presidential and Gubernatorial Approvals ............................................................................................................... 5 Gun Ownership and Support for Gun Safety Laws ................................................................................................ 6 Gender Equality and Support for ERA ........................................................................................................................ 7 Possible Presidential Election Matchups................................................................................................................... 8 Possible US Senate, US House, and Gubernatorial Matchups........................................................................... -
Déjà Vu — All Over, Again?
The Wilmington Wave Wednesday, November 4, 2020 DÉJÀ VU — ALL OVER, AGAIN? Donald J. Trump claims victory as early results for the presidential election release. Carlos Barria Reuters Thompson Stupak ballots turning the tides for unde- Wilmington Wave clared swing states. Trump had a different take Political beliefs nest at home As of 5 a.m. Wednesday on the mail-in ballots still being Annabelle McCracken with multiple types of views be- morning, the results of the 2020 counted, “Votes cannot be cast Wilmington Wave cause I have seen them more now,” Presidential Election still remain after the Polls are closed!” Trump Blevins said. in limbo. tweeted at 12:49 a.m. “Aware” and “open-minded”; Blevins also stated that she Despite the uncertain- Trump followed up with these were the two most common has more freedom to form her own outcomes, President Donald a speech at 2:21 a.m. calling the words used by college students political beliefs now that she is no J. Trump declared his victory mail in ballots “a fraud on the when asked how college has shaped longer under the influence of her against former Vice President American public.” Trump prom- their political beliefs. family and friends from home. This Joseph R. Biden later in the night, ised to bring the issue of mail-in In light of the 2020 election, seems to be a commonality for when many key swing states pre- ballots to the Supreme Court of several college students were ques- many college students. viously predicted to turn the United States as seven swing tioned about how their college expe- “The exposure to others and blue, appeared in the Rebuplican states had yet to be called. -
Fielded 9/11 – 9/14 Page 1 of 7 Likely Voters Suffolk University/USAT September 11-14, 2020
Suffolk University/USAT North Carolina September 11-14, 2020 Region: (N=500) n % Mountain West --------------------------------------------- 57 11.40 Charlotte Area -------------------------------------------- 119 23.80 Triad ---------------------------------------------------------- 86 17.20 Triangle ---------------------------------------------------- 125 25.00 East/Coastal Plain --------------------------------------- 113 22.60 Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University/USA Today. I would like to get your opinions on some issues of the day. Would you like to spend seven minutes to help us out? {ASK FOR YOUNGEST IN HOUSEHOLD} A. Are you registered to vote in North Carolina? (N=500) n % Yes ---------------------------------------------------------- 500 100.00 1. Which do you most closely identify – male, female, or non-binary (transgender, gender variant, non-conforming)? (N=500) n % Male -------------------------------------------------------- 235 47.00 Female ----------------------------------------------------- 263 52.60 Non-Binary (transgender, gender variant, non-conforming) -------------------------------- 2 0.40 2. How likely are you to vote in the general election for president this November – very likely, somewhat likely, 50-50 or not likely? (N=500) n % Very likely ------------------------------------------------- 495 99.00 Somewhat likely --------------------------------------------- 5 1.00 3. Are you currently registered as… {RANDOMIZE} (N=500) n % Democrat -------------------------------------------------- -
GAPP ACA Post-Election Analysis
2020 Post-Election Analysis President-Elect Joe Biden (D) vs. President Donald Trump (R) The results of the Presidential election will have a tremendous effect on the behavioral health community, specifically licensed professional counselors. The President’s stance on mental health will determine the urgency and the pace in which legislation is signed into law. Below is each candidate’s stance as well as some of their health care priorities. President Trump on Mental Health: President-Elect Biden on Mental Health: “At a time when many Americans are experi- “As a society, we need to work together to encing increased stress, anxiety, and personal eliminate the stigma felt by those who are loss, we must also ensure that our country can suffering and struggling with their mental health. meet the mental health needs of those strug- We must ensure that everyone has access to gling in this crisis.” affordable quality health care and that mental health services are covered.” n President Trump signed an Executive Order to address the negative impact of prolonged n “As President, I will ensure enforcement of shutdowns on mental and behavioral health mental health parity laws and expand funding and increase suicide prevention efforts. for mental health services.” n n “I will accelerate the deployment of telehealth The President is establishing a cabinet-level R Winner working group to assess the mental health needs of the most vulnerable, for mental health and specialty care for rural including the elderly, minorities, children, veterans, and people with communities.” disabilities. n “I will make an unprecedented investment in school mental health n The President signed legislation which allocated approximately $425 million professionals in order to double the number of psychologists, guidance in emergency funds to address mental and substance use disorders. -
Virtual Signature Event Election Panel
Virtual Signature Event Election Panel Panelists Mike Allen Founder and Executive Editor, Axios Media Gloria Borger Chief Political Analyst, CNN Charlie Cook Editor and Publisher, The Cook Political Report Political Analyst, NBC News and National Journal Group Nikole Killion Correspondent, CBS News Moderator David M. Rubenstein President The Economic Club of Washington, D.C. Wednesday, Oct. 21, 2020 1 DAVID M. RUBENSTEIN: I’d like to now introduce our four principal speakers. And I would just say, I know all of them have incredible biographies. And if I read the biographies in great detail, we won’t go too far into the conversation. So, let me just briefly introduce them. I apologize for not giving as long an introduction as they probably deserve. Mike Allen – I’ll do this alphabetically – Mike Allen is the co-founder of Axios and, I would say, maybe Washington’s most indefatigable journalist and most knowledgeable journalist about everything going on in Washington. He never sleeps. He works around the clock. And so, it’s always easy to get him on the phone or get him on email, because he’s always awake. And, Mike, thank you very much for everything you’re doing to bring knowledge and information to people. You’ve been doing it for quite a while, with Politico and Axios. Thank you for joining us. MIKE ALLEN: Thank you, David, for having me. MR. RUBENSTEIN: Gloria Borger is the chief political analyst at CNN. And I’m sure if you watch CNN you see her on the Wolf Blitzer “Situation Room” show and also Anderson Cooper “AC 360,” and many other shows. -
Exploring the Impact of Legislation on the Development of Craft Beer
beverages Article Exploring the Impact of Legislation on the Development of Craft Beer Alistair Williams School of Hospitality, The College of Management, Johnson & Wales University, Charlotte Campus, Charlotte, NC 28202, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-980-598-1531 Academic Editor: James M. Seff Received: 4 December 2016; Accepted: 20 March 2017; Published: 28 March 2017 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ways in which federal and state legislation has impacted the growth of the US craft beer industry. In order to achieve this purpose, the city of Charlotte in North Carolina (N.C.) will be used as a case study. The research is conceptual in nature, a preferred choice as it allows a researcher to break down the issue into its constituent parts in order to gain a broader understanding. The research demonstrates that the legal framework in place for the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages in the U.S.A., which is a legacy of the Prohibition movement of the last century, continues to have a significant impact on the development of the craft beer industry. The growth in the number of breweries across the U.S.A. has been driven by the craft brewing industry and has provided consumers with a vastly increased array of choices (Burgdorf, 2016). The growth in the craft beer industry has not been proportional across all states, however. While many factors influence the growth of craft breweries (Carroll and Swaminathan, 2000), regulations such as those that restrict how brewers can distribute and retail beer have inhibited growth in many states, limiting consumer choice. -
I. Survey Methodology the Elon University Poll Is Conducted Using A
I. Survey Methodology The Elon University Poll is conducted using a stratified random sample of households with telephones and wireless telephone numbers in the population of interest – in this case, citizens in North Carolina. The sample of telephone numbers for the survey is obtained from Survey Sampling International, LLC. Selection of Households To equalize the probability of telephone selection, sample telephone numbers are systematically stratified according to subpopulation strata (e.g., a zip code, a county, a state, etc.), which yields a sample from telephone exchanges in proportion to each exchange's share of telephone households in the population of interest. Estimates of telephone households in the population of interest are generally obtained from several databases. Samples of household telephone numbers are distributed across all eligible blocks of numbers in proportion to the density of listed households assigned in the population of interest according to a specified subpopulation stratum. Upon determining the projected (or preferred) sample size, a sampling interval is calculated by summing the number of listed residential numbers in each eligible block within the population of interest and dividing that sum by the number of sampling points assigned to the population. From a random start between zero and the sampling interval, blocks are systematically selected in proportion to the density of listed household "working blocks." A block (also known as a bank) is a set of contiguous numbers identified by the first two digits of the last four digits of a telephone number. A working block contains three or more working telephone numbers. Exchanges are assigned to a population on the basis of all eligible blocks in proportion to the density of working telephone households. -
KFF Sun Belt Voices Project Final Full Topline
Sun Belt Voices Project Methodology & Topline 1 METHODOLOGY The Sun Belt Voices Project was designed and analyzed by public opinion researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) in collaboration with the Cook Political Report. The survey was conducted August 29th – September 13th, 2020, among a representative random sample of 3,479 registered voters in three Sun Belt states (1,298 in Arizona, 1,009 in Florida, and 1,172 in North Carolina). All registered voters included in the sample were sent an invitation letter including a link to complete the survey online, a toll-free number that respondents could call to complete the survey with a telephone interviewer, and $2 pre-incentive. Respondents who were living in Census block-groups identified as low-education and respondents identified as likely Hispanic were offered $10 post-incentive if they completed the survey. All respondents were then sent a reminder postcard, which included a QR code. Respondents who were flagged in the voter file as both a) speaking Spanish and b) speaking either primarily or only their native language, received bilingual mailings, including text in both English and Spanish. The sample was designed to reach respondents less likely to complete surveys online, by oversampling areas with a relatively low percentage of college graduates. Sample that could be matched to telephone numbers and that had not yet completed the survey online or by inbound computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) were called by CATI interviewers to attempt to convert this sample to completed interviews. A total of 3,116 respondents completed the questionnaire online, 89 by calling in to complete, and 274 were completed as outbound CATI interviews.