Flow Analysis Over an Airplane with Swept and Unswept Wings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Critical Mach Number, Transonic Area Rule
Critical Mach number - Compressibility Effects on Lift The design parameter that influences compressibility effects on lift is the Critical Mach number (Mcr). This is the free stream Mach number when sonic conditions (M = 1) is reached at some point on the airfoil surface The figure illustrates the same airfoil, at the same angle of attack at different free stream Mach numbers leading to the definition of the critical Mach number The critical Mach number can be obtained through the curve for the minimum pressure coefficient as a function of Mach number. It can be determined through the intersection of the two equations The lift coefficient correction for compressibility is The figure above illustrates that If you plan to fly at high free stream Mach number, you airfoil should be thin to (a) increase your critical Mach number as this will keep your drag rise small This will also result in lower minimum pressure: Therefore your lift coefficient will decrease Note that the minimum pressure coefficient on thick airfoil is high; this means that the velocity is also correspondingly high. Therefore the critical Mach number is reached for lower value of the free stream Mach number. Swept wing A B-52 Stratofortress showing wing with a large sweepback angle. A swept wing is a wing planform favored for high subsonic jet speeds first investigated in Germany from 1935 onwards until the end of the Second World War. Since the introduction of the MiG-15 and North American F-86 which demonstrated a decisive superiority over the slower first generation of straight-wing jet fighters during the Korean War, swept wings have become almost universal on all but the slowest jets (such as the A- 10). -
B851-1 AIR TRAFFIC Activities 080501 - 080504 Om080501 to the UNECE1
AIR TRAFFIC om080501 Activities 080501 - 080504 SNAP CODES: 080501 080502 080503 080504 SOURCE ACTIVITY TITLE: AIR TRAFFIC Domestic airport traffic (LTO-cycles < 1000 m altitude) International airport traffic (LTO-cycles < 1000 m altitude) Domestic cruise traffic ( > 1000 m altitude) International cruise traffic ( > 1000 m altitude) NOSE CODES: 202.05.01 202.05.02 202.05.03 202.05.04 NFR CODE: 1 A 3 a i (i) 1 A 3 a i (ii) 1 A 3 a ii (i) 1 A 3 a ii (ii) 1 ACTIVITIES INCLUDED This chapter presents common guidelines for estimation of emissions from air traffic. The guideline includes four activities (Table 1.1). Table 1.1 Overview of the activities included in the present reporting guidelines Activity SNAP CODE NOSE CODE NFR CODE Domestic airport traffic (LTO-cycles < 1000 m altitude) 080501 202.05.01 1 A 3 a ii (i) International airport traffic (LTO-cycles < 1000 m altitude) 080502 202.05.02 1 A 3 a i (i) Domestic cruise traffic ( > 1000 m altitude) 080503 202.05.03 1 A 3 a ii (ii) International cruise traffic ( > 1000 m altitude) 080504 202.05.04 1 A 3 a i (ii) LTO is an abbreviation for the Landing and Take-Off cycle. Domestic aviation is associated with the SNAP codes 080501 + 080503; International aviation is associated with the SNAP codes 080502 + 080504; LTO-cycle activities include SNAP codes 080501 + 080502; Cruise activities include SNAP codes 080503 + 080504. Emissions associated with domestic and international aviation are to be reported to the UNFCCC. According to the new reporting guidelines, only emissions from domestic aviation shall be reported to the UNFCCC as a part of national totals. -
Jly Jjl1 J!JJ~
Numt er 90 1975 * AUSTRALIAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT JlY JJl1 J!JJ~ . ~ jJ\111Y !)J!JJ,;)1 ~ I - • _.., \ Number 90 1975 CONTENTS Libelle Sheds Wings in Flight . .......... ....... 2 6 ( Tree Hazards ... ...... .. .. ... .. .. .... · · I False Alarm - Boeing 707 Over-runs . ... ...... 10 ..... - ~-= ~'~ Is Air-Sickness \'our Problem? .. .. .... .. ....... · 13 Going Around ...... .... .. ....... .. 14 Hansa Fails to Become Airborne . ........ .. .... 16 Asymmetric Operation - Can You Handle It? ..... 20 Auto-pilot Disengagement •.••....... ... .. .... 26 The Real Thing! . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. · . · · · 27 A Moot Point! ...... .. ....... .. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 28 "1 l'ia1io11 Safer1· Digest i.1 prepared in the Air Safety /rt1'estiga1io11 Bra11C'i and puhlished for the Depart111e111 of 7ra11spor1 1hro11gh 1he A11s1rult1w Go1,ernme111 P11hlisl1111g Ser1•1ce m p11r.1ua11a of RegulalttJll 281 of 1'11· ;I ir \ 'av1ga1io11 Reg11la11011s. lr rs d1s1rih111ed frl'e 1~{ drarge Ill A 11stra/11111 /ice11ce holders ( e.\C'ept sr11de111 pilots J, regl\lered a1rcra_/1 u11·ners. a11d cer tain otlrer 11ersu1t.1 and orga11isatio111· lral'lllg u vested operatw11al 11111•resl in ,-I 111·1ralian civil t11 •1at1011 .4 •'WIWll Sa/<'11' D1ge.11 1.1 al"o ami!ahle 011 .wh.H'np11011 from 1'1" A u.Hralia11 v1J\'~rtr111e111 P11hl1shi11g Sen•1ce 111 s/101111 011 tire order form helo11. ("'-' a -_J © Co111111011wealf/1 of A u.Hralia 1975 7/re co111e111s o/ tlw p11hlica11011 11101' 1101 he reproduced m ll'lrole or in purl. 1V1tlrour · '"~' wr1 11e11 a111/ror11_1· of tire Depar1111e/1f o_/ Tramporl. Where 111a1erwl 1:i 11rd1ca1ed 10 he f'\- 1ral'fed jrom or based 011 a11or/rer p11bltcatio11. rlre a111/ror11r o_I thl' orig111a1or slwuld he souglrr. -
To 00-105E-9 Technical Manual Aerospace Emergency Rescue and Mishap Response Information (Emergency Services)
WELCOME TO TECHNICAL ORDER 00-105E-9, 1 FEBRUARY 2006, REVISION 11. THIS IS SEGMENT 1 COVERING TITLE PAGE, A, B & C PAGES, FOREWORD, LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS, FAA/ICAO DESIGNATORS, AND CHAPTERS 1, 2, & 3. TO NAVIGATE CLICK ON THE CONTINUE BOOKMARKS AND CLICK ON THE (+) SYMBOLS, THEN NOTICE CLICK ON SUBJECT LINKS TO GO TO SPECIFIC VIEWS CONTACT IN THIS SEGMENT. TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE TECHNICAL ORDER, CLICK ON THE CONTINUE BUTTON. TO SEE THE SEGMENT INFORMATION CHANGE NOTICE, CLICK ON THE NOTICE BUTTON. TO CONTACT THE TECHNICAL CONTENT MANAGER , CLICK ON THE CONTACT BUTTON. TECHNICAL ORDER 00-105E-9 TECHNICAL CONTENT MANAGER WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE: HQ AFCESA/CEXF ATTN: Fire and Emergency Services Egress Manager 139 Barnes Drive Suite 1 Tyndall AFB, Florida 32403-5319 E-MAIL: [email protected] INTERNET: HQ AFCESA Fire and Emergency Services PUBLIC WEB PAGE: http://www.afcesa.af.mil/CEX/cexf/index.asp Safety Supplements: http://www.afcesa.af.mil/CEX/cexf/_firemgt.asp PHONE: (850) 283-6150 DSN 523-6150 FAX: (850) 283-6383 DSN 523-6383 For technical order improvements, correcting procedures, and other inquiries, please use the above media most convenient. SEGMENT 1 INFORMATION CHANGE NOTICE This page is provided to notifiy the user of any informational changes made to Technical Order 00-105E-9 in this Segment and the current Revision. Informational changes will be referenced in the Adobe Reader’s Bookmark tool as a designator symbol illustrated as a <[C]> for quick reference to the right of the affected aircraft. The user shall insure the most current information contained in this TO is used for his operation. -
NASA History Division INTRODUCTION to THE
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division INTRODUCTION TO THE AERODYNAMICS OF FLIGHT [NASA SP-367] Theodore A. Talay Langley Research Center Prepared at Langley Research Center Scientific and Technical Information Office National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. 1975 FOREWORD The science of aerodynamics can be traced back thousands of years to its beginnings but, remarkably, only one human life span has separated the first heavier-than-air powered airplane flight at Kitty Hawk from the first manned moon landing. The last few decades have witnessed phenomenal growth in the science and technology of aerodynamics and no letup is in sight. For those who possess an interest, the task of education encompassing all the various aspects of the subject is staggering. Specialization is indicated but a background knowledge is an essential of any education. This volume is a result of several semesters of the author's teaching of an introductory course in aerodynamics to apprentices and technicians at the NASA Langley Research Center. The problem faced was to provide more than a layman's treatment of the subject but not the detail as taught in many individual courses on the college level. The result is a highly qualitative, illustrated set of notes which, through the teaching process, was modified to fulfill the objectives better. A thorough revision of these notes with considerable up-to-date material has resulted in the text as presented herein. It is hoped that this volume will stimulate the reader's interest to pursue more specialized education in the many topics of aerodynamics. -
An Enhanced Method for the Calculation of Third Party Risk Around Large Airports with Application to Schiphol
NLR-CR-2000-147 An enhanced method for the calculation of third party risk around large airports with application to Schiphol A.J. Pikaar, C.J.M. de Jong and J. Weijts This investigation has been carried out under a contract awarded by the Netherlands Department of Civil Aviation (RLD), contract number DGRLD 1999.2.007. No part of this report may be reproduced and/or disclosed, in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of RLD. Division: Air Transport Issued: April 2000 Classification of title: unclassified -2- NLR-CR-2000-147 -3- NLR-CR-2000-147 Summary In 1992 NLR developed a method for the calculation of third party risk levels around airports. The method is applied in many airport risk studies. With the experience gained over the years in application of the method, and due to the availability of improved historical data, the risk models were updated in 1999. This report consists of two parts. In the first part the update to the risk model is described. The second part presents calculations made with the improved method. The following improvements and amendments are discussed in this report: 1. The probability of an accident to happen per aircraft movement, i.e. the accident rate, is determined again based on more recent and accurate data. The rates are over 50% lower than was estimated in the original model. This is partly a result of actual improvement of air traffic safety, and partly of better adaptation to the Schiphol situation; 2. Accident rates are determined separately for three aircraft generations and for six flight phases: take-off veer-off, take-off overrun, take-off overshoot, landing undershoot, landing veer-off, and landing overrun. -
System Definition Review Report Team 3 Tom Zettel Mike Bociaga
System Definition Review Report Team 3 TToomm ZZeetttteell MMiikkee BBoocciiaaggaa JJoonnaatthhaann OOllsstteenn JJaammiiee RRoossiinn HHaayynnee KKiimm BBrraannddoonn WWaasshhiinnggttoonn MMaarrqquueess FFuullffoorrdd CCoonntteennttss MMiissssiioonn SSttaatteemmeenntt MMiissssiioonn PPllaannss DDeessiiggnn RReeqquuiirreemmeennttss AAiirrccrraafftt CCoonncceepptt SSeelleeccttiioonn CCaabbiinn//FFuusseellaaggee LLaayyoouutt CCoonnssttrraaiinntt AAnnaallyyssiiss SSiizziinngg SSttuuddiieess AAddvvaanncceedd TTeecchhnnoollooggiieess SSuummmmaarryy NNeexxtt SStteeppss Mission Statement To create an innovative and cost effective commercial aircraft capable of take-off and landing in extremely short distances, making it available to a larger number of runways, in order to open up more airports, primarily to relieve the continuous growing congestion of large hubs. Mission Plans The goal of Team Arrival’s aircraft is to relieve congestion at major hubs. The three hubs that experience the most congestion (according to www.bts.gov) are Chicago O’Hare, New York LaGuardia, and Newark International. The first mission is to take off from Gary Chicago and land at Dallas Love Field. Gary Chicago airport is located 42 miles from Chicago O’Hare and Dallas Love Field is located 20 miles from Dallas International. This mission is intended to redirect some of the traffic from both Chicago O’Hare and Dallas International to secondary airports that experience less congestion. Team Arrival’s aircraft will have the capability of takeoff and landing on runways of 3000 feet or less making this mission possible. The second mission is to do a half-runway takeoff from New York LaGuardia and do a non-interfering spiral descent at Miami International. Both of the airports at LaGuardia and Miami have a significant amount of road traffic around them and it is Team Arrival’s feeling that most passengers will not want to fly into a secondary airport and then sit in street traffic for an extended period of time in order to get to their final destination. -
Aerospace-Facts-And-Figures-2000
Com pi led by: Economic Data Service Aerospace Research Center Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Director, Research Center David H. Napier Editorial Consultant Ann A. Hunter Design AAH Graphics, Inc. Published by: Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1250 Eye Street, N.W., #1200 Washington, D.C. 20005-3924 FAX (202) 371-8470 For information about orders, call (202) 371-8407 For information about content, call (202) 3 71-8563 Copyright © 2000 by Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. Library of Congress Catalog No. 46-25007 Intern ational Standard Seri al No. 0898-4425 2 .,._,... ~· ' .. - . ' . \'T'~vr.':l\1 . \ ~\tK~JD:'~~LEDEwJEPFfS ·.:~ ·. · · · · LM•~:ru~f<~ :.a. ·~.;'f.:•. Air Transport Association of America Council of Economic Advisers Export-Import Bank of the United States Exxon International Company General Aviation Manufacturers Association Helicopter Association International International Civil Aviation Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Office of Management and Budget U.S. Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis; Bureau of the Census; International Trade Administration) U.S. Department of Defense (Air Force; Army; Ballistic Missile Defense Organization; Comptroller; Directorate for Information, Operatiqps, and Reports; Navy) U.S. Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics) U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airline Statistics) 3 4 CDNTf~TS ' Foreword. 6 Aerospace Summary -
HFB 320 HANSA JET HFB 320 HANSA JET Der Beste Prophet Der Zukunft Ist Die Vergangenheit Lord Byron, 1823 Flugzeugbau in Hamburg Seit 1911
HERZLICH WILLKOMMEN ! HFB 320 - Wegbereiterin der Airbus-Produktion in Hamburg HFB 320 HANSA JET HFB 320 HANSA JET Der beste Prophet der Zukunft ist die Vergangenheit Lord Byron, 1823 Flugzeugbau in Hamburg seit 1911 1903: Erster Motorflug der Gebrüder Wright, Kitty Hawk, USA. 1911: Gründung der Hamburger Luftschiffhallen GmbH 1911: Gründung der Hansa Flugzeugwerke - Bau der „Hansa Taube“ nach dem Vorbild der Etrich Taube. 1914: Friedrich „Krischan“ Christiansen, geb. in Wyk auf Föhr, erhält seine Fluglizenz bei der „Centrale für Aviatik“. Christiansen wird 1930 weltberühmt als Kapitän der Do-X. 1919: Zweite Fluglinienverbindung der Welt führt von Hamburg nach Berlin. (DLR) 1922: Gründung der Bäumer Aero GmbH. 1925 - 1928: Bau des Weltrekordflugzeugs Bäumer „Sausewind“. Ur-Ahn der Heinkel Schnellflugzeuge.Walter & Siegfried Günter. Flugzeugbau in Hamburg seit 1911 1925 - 1928 Bäumer Aero „Sausewind“ Flugzeugbau in Hamburg seit 1911 1929: Erfindung des „Terminal“-Gebäudetyps in Hamburg. 4. Juli 1933: Gründung der Hamburger Flugzeugbau GmbH / B&V. Bau von Ju 52 Teilen in Lizenz. 1937 - 1939: Rund 100 Überquerungen des Nord- und Südatlantiks per Ha 139 Postflugzeug. 1940: Erstflug des Großflugbootes BV 222 nach einer Forderung der Lufthansa für Routen nach New York und Rio de Janeiro. Spannweite 46m (A310: 43.90m) 1944: Erstflug BV 238 als damals größtes Flugzeug der Welt. Spannweite 60,17 m. Länge 43,36 m. Flugzeugbau in Hamburg seit 1911 1936 B&V Ha 139 Flugzeugbau in Hamburg seit 1911 1940 B&V 222 Auf dem Weg zum Hansa Jet Ju 287 - die Ur-Ahnin des Hansa Jets Auf dem Weg zum Hansa Jet Der vorgepfeilte Flügel - Ju 287: 1942: Junkers-Entwicklungschef Prof. -
AIRCRAFTTYPEDESIGNATORS 1. PURPOSE. This Notice Revises
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERALAVIATIONADMINISTRATION mm E 10/1/97 Cancellation Date: 10/1/98 SUBJ: AIRCRAFTTYPEDESIGNATORS 1. PURPOSE. This Notice revises Appendices A and B of Order 7110.65 to standardize the new aircraft designators according to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) document 8643/25. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This directive is distributed to select offices in Washington headquarters, re- gional offices, FAA Technical Center, FAA Aeronautical Center, all air trafilc control facilities, interna- tional aviation field offices, and interested aviation public. 3. BACKGROUND. In the first half of 1996, the Civil Aviation Authority of the Netherlands and the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation undertook the major task of reviewing the current Aircraft Type Designators for ICAO. The recommendations included changes that ensured satis- faction of its original purpose/use and to assign the designators to the aircraft types that most commonly operate throughout the world. The rules for the formulation of designators have been updated (detailed and refined) in order to avoid misinterpretation and confusion when assigning them. Changes were made to the first and third characters of many aircraft type designators. 4. ACTION. Change Order7110.65J, Air Traffic Control, Paragraph 2-4-20a(l) to read: Civil- State the prefix “November” when establishing initial communications with U.S. registered air- craft, followed by the ICAO phonetic pronunciation of the numbers/letters of the aircraft registration. The controller may state the aircraft type, the model, the manufacturer’s name, followed by the ICAO phonetic pronunciation of the numbers/letters of the aircraft registration if used by the pilot on the initial or subsequent call.