DOCSLIB.ORG

1 the Translation That Follows Is of an Appendix to the Third Controversy I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 the Translation That Follows Is of an Appendix to the Third Controversy I 1 The translation that follows is of an appendix to the third controversy in the first volume of St. Robert Bellarmine’s famous Disputations about Controversies of the Christian Faith against the Heretics of this Age, first published at Ingolstadt in 1581- 1593 and republished several times thereafter. The translation is in progress. The Latin text can be downloaded from Google books: http://books.google.com/books?id=vqJaa8h_teQC&pg=PP22&dq=bellarmini+contro versiae&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5ZGvUcO9HtS44APBqoHgAg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAjgU The third controversy itself in the first volume, about the Papacy, is not translated here. A translation has however been published by the Liberty Fund https://catalog.libertyfund.org/natural-law/on-temporal-and-spiritual-authority- paperback-detail.html and also by Mediatrix Press http://mediatrixpress.com/?s=bellarmine Peter L P Simpson July 2016 2 Appendix to Volume One: On the Transfer of the Empire from the Greeks to the Germans In Three Books Contents: Book One: The Roman Empire was transferred from the Greeks to the Franks by Authority of the Roman Pontiff Preface: Argument and Division of this Book Chapter One: Twelve Contradictions in Illyricus are Uncovered. [Chapter Two: The Lies of Illyricus Chapter Three: The Prolegomena of Illyricus are Refuted] Chapter Four: That the Roman Empire was transferred from the Greeks to the Franks by authority of the Supreme Pontiffs is demonstrated by the testimonies of Historians 3 Robert Bellarmine’s Controversies Appendix to Volume One: On the Transfer of the Empire from the Greeks to the Germans In Three Books Book One: The Roman Empire was Transferred from the Greeks to the Franks by Authority of the Roman Pontiff Preface: Argument and Division of this Book As I am about to write of the transfer of the Roman Empire from the Greeks to the Germans against a most lying book, which Matthias Flaccius Illyricus produced a few years ago on the same topic, I thought it would be worth my while if, just as he himself stated some prolegomena by way of preface, so I too should, in place of prolegomena, state a few things by way of preface both about the contradiction and about the manifest and most crass lies of the same Illyricus. For in this way I hope that, once the instability and impudence of the man have been laid open, a way for the truth will made open also at the same time in the ears and minds of those whom falsity has perhaps already seized upon and whom he has overwhelmed with darkness by his arts and by the much confusion and varying of his histories. Next I will enter upon the matter in the following order. For since Illyricus, being inconstant and varying, teaches in one place that the Roman Empire was not transferred by the authority of the Roman Pontiff from the Greeks to the Franks or Germans, and in another place confesses the fact indeed but affirms it was done unjustly and impiously, and that this transfer was an especial miracle of Antichrist, I will for this reason first try to demonstrate that the transfer was truly done by authority of the Supreme Pontiff, and I will take up arguments from the consensus of all the historians, from the consensus of the Emperors and other Princes, from the testimonies of the old Roman Pontiffs, and lastly from refutation of all the rights or titles that the adversaries put forward. For I will show with most certain reasons that Charlemagne, who neither Illyricus nor anyone else denies was Roman Emperor, did not reach this dignity by right of war and arms, or by immediate call from God, or by hereditary succession, or by gift of the Greeks, or lastly by election of the Senate and People of Rome; that therefore either Charlemagne had the Empire from the Pontiff or he did not have it at all. Then I will make it plain that what the Supreme Pontiff did in this transfer of the Empire was done correctly and by right. Lastly, so that as not to seem to have passed over any of the things Illyricus treats of, I will add something about the transfer (if however if should be called a transfer) of the Empire from the family of Charlemagne to the Saxons, and about the institution of the Seven Imperial Electors. 4 Chapter One: Twelve Contradictions are uncovered in Illyricus Our Illyricus, then (to begin from what was proposed first), is accustomed, for his weight and constancy in asserting opinions, to consider not so much what is the case in reality as what may most serve his purpose. Therefore, if affirming something is useful for the cause he defends, he confidently affirms it; if again he thinks denying that very thing conduces to his business, he boldly denies it. He bothers all too little whether his writings cohere with themselves or fight with themselves, and whether one remark gives support to another or whether instead, as in civil war, one is overthrown by another. I. In the book he recently published about the transfer of the Empire, he everywhere calls figments and fables what is generally believed, that the Roman Empire was transferred from the Greeks to the Germans by authority of the Supreme Pontiff. And, to note one particular place, the title of the second part of the first chapter is, ‘That the transfer of the Empire from the Greeks to the Germans was not done by the Popes’. But astonishingly, when he was writing this, he had forgotten what he had written a little before. For when explaining the marks of the Antichrist in the book against the primacy of the Pope, almost at the end, he puts in the fifth place this mark about the transfer of the Empire, and indeed in these words, “Antichrist will appear when the Roman Kingdom will be failing, and he will give the Romans freedom, but under his own name. This happened before the year 700 when the Roman Empire was falling and something was begun by the Pope, not as Caesar, Dictator, Consul, or Senator, but as Roman Pope; for then the Pope propagated his power and empire. So Revelation 13, ‘The wounded beast was honored by another beast, similar to a lamb’.” Illyricus affirms this not only in this book but also in his Centuries. For thus does he write, Century 8.10 col.751, “And so (Leo III) transferred the Roman Empire to Charles and the Franks, and yet he reserved for himself the right of ruling the Franks, and so it happened from then on that whoever received the scepter of Empire was installed by the Pope, and this transfer is preeminent among the miracles of Antichrist, Revelation 13 & 17.” What here will you choose, Illyricus? If the Roman Pontiff transferred the Empire to the Franks, your whole book about the transfer of the Empire collapses; if he did not transfer it, no small part collapses, both from your book against the Primacy and from the Centuries of your History. Indeed rather, whether the Roman Pope transferred the Empire to the Franks or did not, your book about the transfer of the Empire collapses. For indeed you think, in the places above cited, that you have proved by a most effective argument drawn from the word of God that the Pope is Antichrist, because namely the Pope, when he inaugurated the Western Empire, cured the wound of the beast (as you interpret it), which is a miracle and preeminent mark of Antichrist, Revelation 13 & 17. Therefore when, in the book about the transfer of the Empire, you contend so sharply that the Pope is not the author of the Western Empire, what else do you contend for than to cause us to believe false that demonstration of yours by which you wanted to prove, from the word of God, that the Pope is Antichrist? And yet in this very book you repeat, for the third time as well, that the Pope is Antichrist – the book in which you yourself 5 make totter the chief demonstration that you believe establishes the Pope to be Antichrist. But let us proceed to other things. II. In this very book about the transfer of the Empire, in the dedicatory epistle, Illyricus affirms that the Germans acquired the right to the Roman Empire 1500 years ago, namely when, under the leadership of Arminius, they seized two Eagles from the Romans, and that as sign of this thing the Germans carry forward on their insignia a two-headed Eagle. “To this,” he says, “you can refer the fact that under Augustus, not long after Julius, the Germans carried off two Eagles from the Romans in a most just war.” And later, “Whenever therefore the Roman sacrificing priest and others jealous of empire wish to know the origin and right of the monarchy of the Germans, let them only gaze on and contemplate its glorious insignia displaying the two-headed Eagle, and these insignia will soon abundantly teach them about their origin and right and convince them even against their will.” His words. But these dreams, which we will refute below in chapter 6, are refuted even by the same Illyricus himself when in Centuries 9.16 col.621 he speaks as follows, “The Roman Eagle at the beginning of this century (the century from 800 to 900) was divided into two heads. For by the Pontiff Leo, with the consent of the Senate and people of Rome, Charlemagne, in a solemn rite, was installed as Emperor of the West in the year 801.” How, I ask, do these things cohere, that 1500 years ago the two-headed Eagle and right and origin of the German Empire began, and yet that the Roman Eagle was first divided 700 years ago in the year 801 when Charlemagne was first installed as Emperor of the West by the Pontiff Leo? III.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Times (A.D
    The Catholic Faith History of Catholicism A Brief History of Catholicism (Excerpts from Catholicism for Dummies) Ancient Times (A.D. 33-741) Non-Christian Rome (33-312) o The early Christians (mostly Jews who maintained their Jewish traditions) o Jerusalem’s religious establishment tolerated the early Christians as a fringe element of Judaism o Christianity splits into its own religion . Growing number of Gentile converts (outnumbered Jewish converts by the end of the first century) . Greek and Roman cultural influences were adapted into Christianity . Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (resulted in the final and formal expulsion of the Christians from Judaism) o The Roman persecutions . The first period (A.D. 68-117) – Emperor Nero blamed Christians for the burning of Rome . The second period (A.D. 117-192) – Emperors were less tyrannical and despotic but the persecutions were still promoted . The third period (A.D. 193-313) – Persecutions were the most virulent, violent, and atrocious during this period Christian Rome (313-475) o A.D. 286 Roman Empire split between East and West . Constantinople – formerly the city of Byzantium and now present- day Istanbul . Rome – declined in power and prestige during the barbarian invasions (A.D. 378-570) while the papacy emerged as the stable center of a chaotic world o Roman Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 which legalized Christianity – it was no longer a capital crime to be Christian o A.D. 380 Christianity became the official state religion – Paganism was outlawed o The Christian Patriarchs (Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinople) .
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher White Table of Contents
    Christopher White Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Peter the “rock”? ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Churches change over time ...................................................................................................................... 6 The Church and her earthly pilgrimage .................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1 The Apostle Peter (d. 64?) : First Bishop and Pope of Rome? .................................................. 11 Peter in Rome ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Yes and No .............................................................................................................................................. 13 The death of Peter .................................................................................................................................. 15 Chapter 2 Pope Sylvester (314-335): Constantine’s Pope ......................................................................... 16 Constantine and his imprint .................................................................................................................... 17 “Remembering” Sylvester ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IV. the Wording and Meaning of the “Constitutum Constantini”
    IV. The wording and meaning of the “Constitutum Constantini” Recollection plays base tricks with past reality; it reconstructs it and constantly creates it anew. This applies equally to individual and to collective memory. It changes its reference as and when it pleases. The reality of forgeries is not immune from such distortions, and once they have become the subject of memory they themselves can be forged and altered dramatically. So it was that memory altered the pseudo-Constantinian creation, and made of it something that it had never been; there was a substantial shift in the system of reference of cultural meaning. In order to demonstrate this we must leave behind the “Donation” and its monumental effects, and turn instead to its apparently harmless earlier history, that is to the actual text of the “Constitutum Constantini” and its origin. What did the forger originally write (and Pseudo-Isidore and the early manuscripts of the Decretum Gratiani preserve?) How was it to be understood? What effects did it have at the time? The original wording of the text takes us back to another age, to another society, to other memories of Rome, other discourses, other concepts and another understanding of the text. Once it had been made part of history the context, legal consequences and entire intention of Constantine’s donation changed. So what had Constantine, at the behest of the forger, ‘donated’? What did his curious decreti pagina, the figure of memory in the “Constitutum Constantini”, an- nounce? Once again we must remember that each memory is linked to its temporal context and to its needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enchiridion of Pope Leo III
    The Enchiridion of Pope Leo III Translated from original French Sources by Sarah Kane French 2004 1 With the Wise Cabalists It is only after assiduous research that we have been able to improve and supplement The Enchiridion of Pope Leo III. All the editions of this work, which were able to be gathered from Parma, Mainz, Rome, Lyon, and Frankfurt, and others, enabled us to place things in an order and exactitude not seen until now. The editions all vary, to some degree, and it is because of these various changes, or because one finds an analogy with the author, that it has been called Papillons, (in French, The Butterflies.) A separate note from your illustrious editor: I have never heard of the Enchiridion called Papillons before. The closest I have heard is one of the many versions of The Black Pullet, or The Treasure of the Old Man of the Pyramids, which has been called The Green Butterfly, as well as Red Magic, The Hen with the Golden Eggs, and the Queen of Hairy Flies. However, according to the edition I had access to, the Enchiridion also maintained a Butterfly reference. One finds in the various editions the seven psalms appropriate to this work, which we have removed, adding in the place of those psalms, the names and characters of the same spirits to which they are referent, pulled from the Cabala. (In my editing, I have put those psalms back, while retaining these authors’ work.) Charlemagne, to whom this work is devoted, like a precious treasure, was the first who knew, by experience, the surprising and marvelous effects, if the Orisons herein are spoken with veneration, with the face towards the rising sun.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Liber Pontificalis
    No. 9 (Spring 2017), 235-252 ISSN 2014-7023 INSIGHTS AND REMARKS ON THE BIOGRAPHY OF PASCHAL I (817-824) IN THE LIBER PONTIFICALIS Andrea Antonio Verardi Sapienza-Università di Roma/Pontificia Università Gregoriana e-mail: [email protected] Received: 23 Feb. 2017 | Revised: 29 March 2017 | Accepted: 26 April 2017 | Available online: 21 June 2017 | doi: 10.1344/Svmma2017.9.16 Resum Attraverso una rilettura delle principali fonti franche e romane utili per la ricostruzione delle vicende relative al pontificato di papa Pasquale I (817-824), l’autore propone l’ipotesi che la biografia presente nelLiber Pontificalis romano sia stata redatta sia per rispondere ad alcune accuse mosse dagli oppositori del papa in città e all’interno del mondo franco, sia che la costruzione della figura di Pasquale (monaco ma anche sovrano misericordioso) possa corrispondere alla caratterizzazione che negli stessi anni è usata anche per la rappresentazione dell’imperatore Ludovico il Pio, indicando quale spunto per il prosieguo della ricerca la possibilità di individuare analizzare puntualmente questi rapporti con per chiarire gli influssi e le implicazioni culturali e ecclesiologiche. Paraules clau: Ludovico Il Pio, Sacro Romano Impero, Papato Altomedievale, Fonti, Biografie storiche Abstract Through a reinterpretation of the main Frankish and Roman sources for the reconstruction of the events related to the pontificate of Pope Paschal I (817-824), the author puts forward the hypothesis that either his biography in the Liber Pontificalis was written to answer the accusations made by both his opponents in the city and in the Carolingian world, or that the construction of Paschal’s figure (a monk, but also a merciful sovereign) may correspond to the characterization that in those same years was also used to portray Emperor Louis the Pious.
    [Show full text]
  • In Hac Tanta Encyclical of Pope Benedict Xv on St
    IN HAC TANTA ENCYCLICAL OF POPE BENEDICT XV ON ST. BONIFACE TO HIS EMINENCE CARDINAL HARTMANN, ARCHBISHOP OF COLOGNE, AND TO THE OTHER ARCHBISHOPS OF GERMANY. May, 14, 1919 Beloved Son and Venerable Brothers, Greetings and The Apostolic Blessing. We are in the midst of many trials and difficulties "and besides the other sufferings, there is my constant daily concern, for all the churches,"[1] to use the words of the Apostle. We have closely followed those unexpected events, those manifestations of disorder and of anarchy which have recently occurred among you and among neighboring countries. They continue to hold us in suspense. 2. In these dark times, the memory of St. Boniface, who brought salvation to Germany twelve centuries ago, is a ray of light and a messenger of hope and joy. We commemorate the ancient union of the German people with the Apostolic See. This union planted the first seeds of faith in your country and helped them grow. After the Roman See entrusted Boniface with this legation, he ennobled it by the exceptional glory of his deeds and, finally, by the blood of martyrdom. 3. Now twelve centuries later, we think you should plan as many celebrations as possible to commemorate this new era of Christian civilization. This era was begun by the mission and the preaching of Boniface, and then carried forth by his disciples and successors. From these came the salvation and the prosperity of Germany. 4. Another purpose of the celebrations is to perfect the present and to reestablish religious unity and peace for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Coronation of Charlemagne
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2005 The iS gnificance of the Coronation of Charlemagne Monica Fleener Western Oregon University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Fleener, Monica, "The iS gnificance of the Coronation of Charlemagne" (2005). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 127. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/127 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Significance of the Coronation of Charlemagne By Monica Fleener Western Oregon University HST 499: Senior Seminar Professor Kimberly Jensen Spring 2005 Primary Thesis Advisor: Dr. Benedict Lowe Secondary Thesis Advisor: Dr. Narasingha Sil I. On Christmas Day in the year 800 A.D. Charlemagne, king of the Franks and part of the Carolingian line, 1 was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by Pope Leo III (795-816). The coronation took place during mass at the Basilica of St. Peter in Rome; immediately following the coronation, the acclamation of the people of Rome was heard: “To Charles, the most pious Augustus, crowned by God, the great and peace-giving Emperor, life and victory.” After this proclamation was made three times, the king “was adored by the pope in the manner of ancient princes; and, the title of patricius being dropped, he was called emperor and augustus.”2 The coronation of Charlemagne created the Holy Roman Empire, which endured until 1806.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ninth-Century Rome: the Patrocinia of Diaconiae, Xenodochia, and Greek Monasteries*
    FOREIGN SAINTS AT HOME IN EIGHTH- AND NINTH-CENTURY ROME: THE PATROCINIA OF DIACONIAE, XENODOCHIA, AND GREEK MONASTERIES* Maya Maskarinec Rome, by the 9th century, housed well over a hundred churches, oratories, monasteries and other religious establishments.1 A substantial number of these intramural foundations were dedicated to “foreign” saints, that is, saints who were associated, by their liturgical commemoration, with locations outside Rome.2 Many of these foundations were linked to, or promoted by Rome’s immigrant population or travelers. Early medieval Rome continued to be well connected with the wider Mediterranean world; in particular, it boasted a lively Greek-speaking population.3 This paper investigates the correlation between “foreign” institutions and “foreign” cults in early medieval Rome, arguing that the cults of foreign saints served to differentiate these communities, marking them out as distinct units in Rome, while at the same time helping integrate them into Rome’s sacred topography.4 To do so, the paper first presents a brief overview of Rome’s religious institutions associated with eastern influence and foreigners. It * This article is based on research conducted for my doctoral dissertation (in progress) entitled “Building Rome Saint by Saint: Sanctity from Abroad at Home in the City (6th-9th century).” 1 An overview of the existing religious foundations in Rome is provided by the so-called “Catalogue of 807,” which I discuss below. For a recent overview, see Roberto Meneghini, Riccardo Santangeli Valenzani, and Elisabetta Bianchi, Roma nell'altomedioevo: topografia e urbanistica della città dal V al X secolo (Rome: Istituto poligrafico e zecca dello stato, 2004) (hereafter Meneghini, Santangeli Valenzani, and Bianchi, Roma nell'altomedioevo).
    [Show full text]
  • Church History, Lesson 5: the Medieval Church, Part 1: the Age of Darkness (590 – 1054)
    38 Church History, Lesson 5: The Medieval Church, Part 1: The Age of Darkness (590 – 1054) 11. Great Leaders a. Pope Gregory I (Gregory the Great) (540 – 604) i. Background: The last Roman Emperor fell in 476. Rome and the surrounding regions had been invaded by “barbarians,” people from what we now call Europe. This divided the Roman Empire into several kingdoms. ii. In 590 , Gregory was elected as Pope. iii. Significance 1. Politically: Under Gregory I, the papacy begins to assume not only spiritual power but political power that will hold sway for a thousand years. “After Gregory, the pope was no longer only a Christian leader; he was also an important political figure in European politics: God’s Counsul.” 25 2. Church: a. First monk to become bishop of Rome. b. Evangelized Europe, including German tribes and the British Isles. c. Organizer of the Gregorian chant. d. Asserted authority as the bishop of Rome over entire Western church. e. Laid the groundwork for much of the theology and practice that we now call Roman Catholicism. i. The Fall weakened human’s free will, but with the help of grace, human-kind may perform good 25 Shelley, Church History In Plain Language, 177. Church History © 2015 by Dan Burrus 39 works, which are the product of grace and human will. ii. God forgives sins at baptism. Sins committed after baptism must be atoned through penance. iii. Prayers may be made to deceased saints who intercede for us. iv. Sins could be atoned for in purgatory, if not sufficiently atoned for in this life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Schism Between the Orthodox East and Itself the Roman Empire, It Was Rare for a Byzantine to Speak Latin
    Mediterranean became far more difficult. Record: 1 The great divorce. (cover story). By: Galli, Mark. Christian History. Geo-political realities complicated things. For centuries, the popes had turned naturally to Constantinople 1997, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p10. 9p. Reading Level (Lexile): 1050. and its emperor for military and economic help. But in 754, Pope Stephen II, cut off from the East and in Database: MAS Ultra - School Edition need of help to defend his papal states from attacks by the Lombards, turned north and sought help from the Frankish ruler, Pepin. Henceforth, the papacy began to pass increasingly under Frankish influence. Notes: This title is held locally THE GREAT DIVORCE A half-century later, a more symbolic and dramatic event took place. On Christmas Day in the year 800, Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, king of the Franks, as emperor of the "Holy Roman Empire." For centuries Christians East and West lived as strangers to one another. Then Catholics violated Charlemagne immediately sought recognition from the emperor at Byzantium. The Byzantine emperor, the Orthodox. however, considered himself ruler of a still united Roman Empire. Charlemagne he regarded as an One summer afternoon in the year 1054, as a service was about to begin in the great Church of the Holy intruder, and the papal coronation, an act of schism. He didn't recognize Charlemagne for years. Wisdom, or Hagia Sophia, at Constantinople, Cardinal Humbert and two other legates of the Roman pope entered. They made their way to the sanctuary. They placed a sealed papal document--called a Becoming strangers "bull"--on the altar and marched out The bull proclaimed the patriarch of Constantinople and his With the reign of Charlemagne, the schism of civilizations first became apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independence of the Celtic Church 121
    THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CELTIC CHURCH 121 THE INDEPENDENCE Oli" THE CELTIC CHURCH. BY THE REV. F. R. MONTGOMERY HITCHCOCK, D.D. THE CHURCH OF IRELAND: ITS CONNECTION WITH THE EAST; ITS DIFFERENCES FROM THE CHURCH OF ROME; ITS INDEPENDENCE. HE Church of Ireland until the twelfth century, generally T speaking, for six centuries, was a free and a nationa.J. Church. It had many points of contact with the Eastern Church which suggest an Eastern origin, and as many points of difference from the Roman Church which make a Roman origin impossible. In the first place, we shall briefly summarize the points of contact with the East. With regard to the monastic habitations, they resemble in plan, i.e. a group of small huts surrounded by a cashel, the communities of the East, like that of Mount Tabor, after which they were modelled. 1 The ascetic practices of the Irish hermit, such as suspending oneself by the armpits from hooks, a were imitations of the devices in self-torture discovered by the anchorites of the Syrian desert, probably in imitation of the Indian fakir's methods of self-torture. The smallness of the ·churches reminded travellers of those of Mount Athos and Asia Minor ; and the group of seven churches, e.g. at Glendalough and Clonmacnois suggests the " Seven Churches of Asia." The shape of the doors of the hermitages of SS. Flannan and Molua at Killaloe, broader at the threshold than at the head, resembles Egyptian style of architecture. The circle of the Irish cross is probably the loop of the crux ansata of the Egyptians, their circle of life being an emblem of immortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Decree Giving Bishop of Rome Supremacy Over the Church
    Decree Giving Bishop Of Rome Supremacy Over The Church Distaff Tamas demonstrated directly or prescinds smoothly when Worthy is millionth. Low-keyed and churrigueresque sectarianizesHarvie repaper her her sots Ostend so poco unbuilding that Zebedee while Morse air-drop excogitating very furthermore. some Mennonites nostalgically. Pelting Eduardo Marzio bernasconi concluded that thou me a church over churches and decrees extend beyond what is he was used its own mind was. The church over and rome on a phenomenon which robert appleton company news agency as a fact that made or disagreed with particular. That laws for that god will perform certain councils have been elected pope now enjoyed special commission on light kindled from tradition holds authority over the decree giving bishop of rome. About progress to prove them be detrimental to decree of the giving of his destiny. That bishop over churches combine efforts, decree that de luca again to church! This decree of rome, over all of a penitent all three denials on by which in economically weak and to set up to receive them. Thus obtained certain that st edward the episcopate is clearly stated, but the councils meant something like a balance both regional councils cannot live fully church of giving bishop over the decree supremacy of the roman general. For their qualities of bishop. Historian Agostino Lauro points out that the stamp of conciliar theory was settled for de Luca and country many others, the Bible, but you had no supremacy over them. Why is it over the decree of giving utterance fulfils these were as a more effective manner by god had brilliantly used to give themselves, perhaps reacting to.
    [Show full text]