Make Listening Safe Loss Due to Exposure to Loud Sounds in WHO Recreational Settings
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Estimation of the risk of developing hearing Make Listening Safe loss due to exposure to loud sounds in WHO recreational settings The objective of this meta-analysis is to comprehensively assess the existing evidence on the levels of risky exposure to loud sounds among young people who listen to music through personal audio devices or frequently attend entertainment venues, and to provide July 2019 an estimated number of young people who are at risk of developing hearing loss due to unsafe listening practices. The document has been prepared by WHO. Estimation of the risk of developing hearing loss due to exposure to loud sounds in recreational settings Authors Dr Shelly Chadha Dr Ricardo Martinez Dr Kaloyan Kamenov 2 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Objectives ........................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 2 Systematic literature review ...................................................................................... 2 Inclusion criteria for studies on exposure to loud sounds through the use of personal audio devices ..................................................................................................................... 2 Inclusion criteria for studies on exposure to loud sounds in entertainment venues ........ 3 Meta-analysis ............................................................................................................. 3 Results ................................................................................................................. 4 Exposure to loud music through personal audio devices and systems ..................... 5 Exposure to loud music through personal audio devices and systems ..................... 6 Estimation of the number of young people at risk of developing hearing loss due to recreational loud sounds ........................................................................................... 7 WHO response .................................................................................................... 8 References .......................................................................................................... 9 3 Introduction Hearing loss affects millions of people around the world and it is anticipated that unless action is taken the number of people with hearing loss could double from its current level by 2050 (1). One of the key contributors to hearing loss is recreational noise. Studies show that more and more young people are at high risk of hearing loss due to exposure to loud sounds in recreational settings, such as bars, discotheques, clubs or sporting events (2,3). On the other hand, most adolescents and young adults listen to music (over personal audio systems) in a way that puts them at risk of hearing loss (4,5). Such hearing loss is of great concern as it is irreversible, while being preventable through safe listening. Evidence shows that during their leisure time, people seem to expose themselves to loud levels of sound. A typical listener has the volume at a range between 75-100 dB(A) and individuals who listen to 15 minutes of music at 100 dB(A) using personal music players may be exposed to the same level of loudness as industrial workers exposed to 85 dB(A) in an 8-hour day (6). The sound level of personal devices may range between 75 and 105 dB(A); ear-bud type inserted ear phones produce maximum levels ranging from 88 to 113 dB(A) across different devices (7,8). The maximum sound level of available listening devices currently in the market can reach 78 to 136 dB(A) (9). When it comes to recreational venues, many young people are exposed to high-volume music in discotheques, where mean sound levels range from 104 to 112 dB(A), whereas at pop concerts sound levels can often be even higher (10). Existing occupational safety standards determine sound levels which, if exceeded, are assumed to be potentially damaging for the hearing of a person. For Europe, these limits are 80 dB(A) for 40 hours per week (56 hours including weekends) (11), whereas for Australia, United Kingdom, and Canada the workplace noise limit is set at 85 dB(A) for 40 hours week (56 hours including weekends) (2). Since the sound pressure levels are measured on a logarithmic scale and adding two sounds of equal pressure levels and duration results in a total pressure that is 3 dB(A) higher than each individual sound pressure level (12), it can be assumed that listening to a music level of 80 dB(A) for 56 hours a week is equal to listening to 89 dB(A) for seven hours per week (13). Therefore, the EU’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks states that listening for 1 hour a day to a sound level of more than 89 dB(A) is potentially damaging (14). If this rule is applied also to the standards available in Australia, UK and Canada, then listening to a music level of 94 dB(A) for more than one hour a day could be potentially damaging. Given the existing sound limits and the steady increase in the use of personal audio devices by young people as well as the wide exposure to loud sounds in entertainment venues, it is important to estimate the number of people who are at risk of developing hearing loss due to recreational loud sounds. Objectives The objective of this literature review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the existing evidence on the levels of risky exposure to loud sounds among young people who listen to music through personal audio devices or frequently attend entertainment venues, and to provide an estimated number of young people who are at risk of developing hearing loss due to unsafe listening practices. Methodology Systematic literature review Firstly, a literature review was carried out to identify published studies that explore 1) exposure of young people to loud sounds through listening to personal audio devices defined as a risk for developing hearing loss and 2) attendance of people to entertainment venues such as bars of clubs with a frequency defined as a risk for developing hearing loss. Inclusion criteria for studies on exposure to loud sounds through the use of personal audio devices • Studies with data gathered between 2003 (year of explosion of mp3 players sales) and 2014. 2 • Age of participants from 12 to 34 years. This age group was selected as primary users of listening devices • Cross-sectional and retrospective case studies • Exposure to personal listening devices with a frequency defined as a risk of hearing loss by the author of the study. When the frequency was not explicitly defined, Henderson et al. (15) criteria of listening to a device using headphones at least 3 times a week or 3 hours a week defined as risky behavior was used. • No language restrictions were applied. Inclusion criteria for studies on exposure to loud sounds in entertainment venues • Studies published from 2000 to 2014 • Age of participants from 12 to 34 years. • Cross-sectional and retrospective case studies • Attendance to entertainment venues such as clubs or discotheques with a frequency defined as a risk of hearing loss by the author of the study. If frequency was not defined, attendance more often than once a month was applied as risky behavior (15). • No language restrictions were applied In addition, studies investigating exposure to loud sounds in arenas and sports events were included in the search. Meta-analysis Meta-analysis was carried out with the included studies to estimate the percentage of people who were exposed to unsafe levels of sound through personal audio devices or entertainment venues. Analysis was conducted with MetaXL v2 software as an add-in to Excel, and Comprehensive Meta- Analysis (CMA 3.3). Heterogeneity was measured with Cochrane Q and I2 statistics. Due to the expected significant heterogeneity between studies in terms of different study groups and outcome measures, a random effects model was chosen for the meta-analysis. In a random-effects meta-analysis, it is assumed that each study is estimating a study-specific true effect. The 3 observed heterogeneity in the estimates is normally attributed to two sources - between-study heterogeneity in true effects, and within-study sampling error. Subgroup analyses by age category, region and country income level were undertaken to see whether the percentage of exposure varied in different subgroups. In the case of income groups, two categories of income were applied - more or equal than $35,000 GNI per capita (named High Income), and less than $35,000 GNI per capita (named Middle-High Income). Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to identify potential outliers among the studies. Results Initially, 25 studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. However, due to heterogeneous methodologies, only 15 could be included in the meta-analyses. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis on exposure to loud sounds through personal audio devices and 11 in the meta-analysis on exposure to loud sounds in recreational settings. All studies were carried out in high- or middle-income countries. Very few studies were found on exposure to loud sounds in arenas and sports events; therefore, performing meta-analysis was not possible. Table 1 shows characteristics of the included studies. Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies SAMPLE COUNTRY YEAR AUTHORS AGE