DOCSLIB.ORG

Jonathan Little's Poker Cash Game Cheatsheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jonathan Little's Poker Cash Game Cheatsheet Jonathan Little’s Poker Cash Game Cheat Sheet • Think about the action on every street of • If you have a bad memory, write the notes in a • Against players who play too many hands too every hand before you act. notebook. aggressively: • Do NOT play robotically. • Take notes on what each specific player does o Realize they often have marginal hands even when they apply pressure. • Don’t play the same generic style all the incorrectly. time. • Always put your opponent on a RANGE OF HANDS o Realize that if you induce them to bluff, do not fold decently strong holdings. • Adjust your strategy to exploit your specific rather than a specific hand. opponents. • Value bet when you think you have the best hand most o Be willing to bluff often because they will usually fold if you apply aggression. • Exploit your opponents’ tendencies. of the time AND you think your opponent will call with many weaker hands. o Bluff them on scary boards. • Raise with a different range based on the effective stack size. • Value bet relatively weak made hands on the turn • Against players who play too few hands too against loose players/calling stations who rarely fold passively: • When calling a raise, ensure you are any made hand or draw. getting at least 10:1 implied odds with o Relentlessly steal their blinds. • Do NOT value bet when you think you have the best small pocket pairs and 20:1 with suited o Fold to their aggression. connectors. hand most of the time and you think your opponent will fold most hands that you beat. • Against players who play too few hands too • When the effective stack is greater than 40 aggressively: • Do NOT value bet the turn and river against tight BBs, try to play lots of pots in position, o Do not try to bluff them off hands they players who will fold all their worse hands and continue especially when you think you can get perceive as strong. with all their better hands. heads-up against opponents who play o Play hands with huge implied odds. poorly post-flop. • Pot control to avoid getting blown off your hand and to o Do not stack off with hands worse than top • You MUST get well out of your comfort induce your opponent to bluff. pair, top kicker. zone and blatantly exploit your opponents’ • Do NOT pot control when your opponents will pay you o Relentlessly steal their blinds. weaknesses if you want to become a big off poorly. • Against players who play well: o If they think you are tight, bluff a lot. winner. • Do NOT pot control when your opponents will rarely o If they think you are wild, play tightly. • If you only pay attention to your own two bluff the river. o Apply aggression in intelligent spots. cards, your position, and your chip stack, • Against players who play too many hands too passively: o Fold when it is clear they want to put you are certain to fail in the long run. o Value bet relentlessly. money in the pot. • You MUST focus on your opponents. o Intelligently avoid them and focus on o Fold when they apply significant pressure. • Pay attention to EVERY SINGLE HAND that playing against the weak players. o Bluff on later streets when they have a takes place during your cash game session. marginal range AND you think they will fold. • Take mental notes about your opponents. Jonathan Little’s Poker Cash Game Cheat Sheet Things to Focus on BEFORE Things to Focus on DURING Things to Focus on AFTER Your Cash Session: Each Hand of Your Session Your Cash Session: Bankroll and Mindset Effective Stack Size Track Results Do I have the proper bankroll of at least 3,000 How should I alter my play based on the effective Did I record the results of my session? to 5,000 big blinds? stack size? The Good If I don’t, am I in the mindset to play properly Casino Bonuses What did I do well? as if I was properly bankrolled? Should various casino bonuses alter my play? The Bad Do I have enough money on hand to re-buy as Expectation What did I do poorly? necessary? How do I maximize my expectation for THIS hand? Get Specific Sleep Notes Are there any specific hands I have problems Did I get a full night’s sleep? Am I writing down my difficult hands so I can review with? them later? Breakfast Discuss with Friends Did I eat a healthy breakfast? My Opponent Did I discuss my difficult hands with my friends What do I know about my opponent? and post them on the PokerCoaching.com Study forum? Did I study my previous games to find my What are my opponent’s tendencies? errors? Improve My Weaknesses What can I do to take advantage of my opponent’s What aspect of my game do I need to work on Mental Focus tendencies? the most BEFORE my next cash game session? Is my mind clear such that playing poker is the What does my opponent know or think he knows ONLY thing that matters now? Take Action think about me? What steps can I take IMMEDIATELY to ensure Is my opponent doing anything to take advantage of I play better next time? me? What should I do to be sure my opponent is not Learn from Top Pros with Over taking advantage of me? Start your free membership: $56 Million in Combined Earnings! PokerCoaching.com Should I play in an exploitable or balanced manner against my opponent? Try It FREE! No Credit Card Required! PokerCoaching.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early Round Bluffing in Poker Author(S): California Jack Cassidy Source: the American Mathematical Monthly, Vol
    Early Round Bluffing in Poker Author(s): California Jack Cassidy Source: The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 122, No. 8 (October 2015), pp. 726-744 Published by: Mathematical Association of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.122.8.726 Accessed: 23-12-2015 19:20 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Mathematical Association of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Mathematical Monthly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.32.135.128 on Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:20:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Early Round Bluffing in Poker California Jack Cassidy Abstract. Using a simplified form of the Von Neumann and Morgenstern poker calculations, the author explores the effect of hand volatility on bluffing strategy, and shows that one should never bluff in the first round of Texas Hold’Em. 1. INTRODUCTION. The phrase “the mathematics of bluffing” often brings a puzzled response from nonmathematicians. “Isn’t that an oxymoron? Bluffing is psy- chological,” they might say, or, “Bluffing doesn’t work in online poker.
    [Show full text]
  • Abiding Chance: Online Poker and the Software of Self-Discipline
    ESSAYS Abiding Chance: Online Poker and the Software of Self- Discipline Natasha Dow Schüll A man sits before a large desktop monitor station, the double screen divided into twenty- four rectangles of equal size, each containing the green oval of a poker table with positions for nine players. The man is virtu- ally “seated” at all twenty- four tables, along with other players from around the world. He quickly navigates his mouse across the screen, settling for moments at a time on flashing windows where his input is needed to advance play at a given table. His rapid- fire esponsesr are enabled by boxed panels of colored numbers and letters that float above opponents’ names; the letters are acronyms for behavioral tendencies relevant to poker play, and the numbers are statistical scores identifying where each player falls in a range for those tendencies. Taken together, the letters and numbers supply the man with enough information to act strategically at a rate of hundreds of hands per hour. Postsession, the man opens his play- tracking database to make sure the software has successfully imported the few thousand hands he has just played. After quickly scrolling through to ensure that they are all there, he recalls some particularly challenging hands he would like to review and checks a number Thanks to Paul Rabinow and Limor Samimian- Darash, for prompting me to gather this material for a different article, and to Richard Fadok, Paul Gardner, Lauren Kapsalakis, and the students in my 2013 Self as Data graduate seminar at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for helping me to think through that material.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 3 Understanding Hand Strength After the Flop Pokerlist
    Article 3 Understanding Hand Strength After The Flop Pokerlist.org For the most part, post flop play is determined by the strength of your hand and the relative hand strength of your opponent’s hand range. It sounds really complicated but it really isn’t. On the flop when the three community cards are dealt, you will have a better understanding of the strength of your hand and whether or not you should bet. If you have some type of made hand you have to decide if you likely have the best hand. It will almost become second nature to ask yourself how the flop could have changed the strength of your hand? Let’s take a look at the strength of hands to consider after the Flop. Monster hands don’t occur very often and include quads, boats, flushes, and straights. These hands are almost certainly the best hand if it goes to showdown and should be played like the nuts. You want to create big pots when you have monster hands. The second category is very strong hands, which include sets and two pair hands. Whenever you have these hands you likely have the best hand. Sure, you will sometimes lose with set over set, but if you are not playing sets and two pairs like the nuts, quite often you will not be extracting maximum value. Overpairs and top pair hands are the next group of strong hands. Depending on your opponents, with these hands you can usually expect to extract three streets of value when you are doing the betting.
    [Show full text]
  • Kill Everyone
    Kill Everyone Advanced Strategies for No-Limit Hold ’Em Poker Tournaments and Sit-n-Go’s Lee Nelson Tysen Streib and Steven Heston Foreword by Joe Hachem Huntington Press Las Vegas, Nevada Contents Foreword.................................................................................. ix Author’s.Note.......................................................................... xi Introduction..............................................................................1 How.This.Book.Came.About...................................................5 Part One—Early-Stage Play . 1. New.School.Versus.Old.School.............................................9 . 2. Specific.Guidelines.for.Accumulating.Chips.......................53 Part Two—Endgame Strategy Introduction.........................................................................69 . 3. Basic.Endgame.Concepts....................................................71 . 4. Equilibrium.Plays................................................................89 . 5. Kill.Phil:.The.Next.Generation..........................................105 . 6. Prize.Pools.and.Equities....................................................115 . 7. Specific.Strategies.for.Different.Tournament.Types.........149 . 8. Short-Handed.and.Heads-Up.Play...................................179 . 9. Detailed.Analysis.of.a.Professional.SNG..........................205 Part Three—Other Topics .10. Adjustments.to.Recent.Changes.in.No-Limit Hold.’Em.Tournaments....................................................231 .11. Tournament.Luck..............................................................241
    [Show full text]
  • Online Poker Statistics Guide a Comprehensive Guide for Online Poker Players
    Online Poker Statistics Guide A comprehensive guide for online poker players This guide was created by a winning poker player on behalf of Poker Copilot. ​ ​ Poker Copilot is a tool that automatically records your opponents' poker statistics, ​ and shows them onscreen in a HUD (head-up display) while you play. Version 2. Updated April, 2017 Table of Contents Online Poker Statistics Guide 5 Chapter 1: VPIP and PFR 5 Chapter 2: Unopened Preflop Raise (UOPFR) 5 Chapter 3: Blind Stealing 5 Chapter 4: 3-betting and 4-betting 6 Chapter 5: Donk Bets 6 Chapter 6: Continuation Bets (cbets) 6 Chapter 7: Check-Raising 7 Chapter 8: Squeeze Bet 7 Chapter 9: Big Blinds Remaining 7 Chapter 10: Float Bets 7 Chapter 1: VPIP and PFR 8 What are VPIP and PFR and how do they affect your game? 8 VPIP: Voluntarily Put In Pot 8 PFR: Preflop Raise 8 The relationship between VPIP and PFR 8 Identifying player types using VPIP/PFR 9 VPIP and PFR for Six-Max vs. Full Ring 10 Chapter 2: Unopened Preflop Raise (UOPFR) 12 What is the Unopened Preflop Raise poker statistic? 12 What is a hand range? 12 What is a good UOPFR for beginners from each position? 12 How to use Equilab hand charts 13 What about the small and big blinds? 16 When can you widen your UOPFR range? 16 Flat calling using UOPFR 16 Flat calling with implied odds 18 Active players to your left reduce your implied odds 19 Chapter 3: Blind Stealing 20 What is a blind steal? 20 Why is the blind-stealing poker statistic important? 20 Choosing a bet size for a blind steal 20 How to respond to a blind steal
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Player's Strategies in No Limit Texas Hold'em Poker Through
    EPIA'2011 ISBN: 978-989-95618-4-7 Identifying Player’s Strategies in No Limit Texas Hold’em Poker through the Analysis of Individual Moves Luís Filipe Teófilo and Luís Paulo Reis Departamento de Engenharia Informática, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Portugal Laboratório de Inteligência Artificial e de Ciência de Computadores, Universidade do Porto, Portugal [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. The development of competitive artificial Poker playing agents has proven to be a challenge, because agents must deal with unreliable information and deception which make it essential to model the opponents in order to achieve good results. This paper presents a methodology to develop opponent modeling techniques for Poker agents. The approach is based on applying clustering algorithms to a Poker game database in order to identify player types based on their actions. First, common game moves were identified by clustering all players’ moves. Then, player types were defined by calculating the frequency with which the players perform each type of movement. With the given dataset, 7 different types of players were identified with each one having at least one tactic that characterizes him. The identification of player types may improve the overall performance of Poker agents, because it helps the agents to predict the opponent’s moves, by associating each opponent to a distinct cluster. Keywords: Poker, Clustering, Opponent Modeling, Expectation-maximization 1 Introduction Poker is a game that is became a field of interest for the AI research community on the last decade. This game presents a radically different challenge when compared to other games like chess or checkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Poker Math That Matters Simplifying the Secrets of No-Limit Hold’Em
    Poker Math That Matters Simplifying the Secrets of No-Limit Hold’em _______________ By Owen Gaines Poker Math That Matters Copyright © 2010 by Owen Gaines Published by Owen Gaines All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from the author. To request to use any part of this book in any way, write to: [email protected] To order additional copies, visit www.qtippoker.com ISBN-13: 978-0-615-39745-0 ISBN-10: 0-615-39745-X Printed in the United States of America iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................. viii About Owen Gaines .................................................................... x About this Book ........................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................. 3 Why Math Matters ................................................................... 3 Quiz ..................................................................................... 6 Measurements .............................................................................. 9 Your Surroundings .................................................................. 9 Quiz ................................................................................... 14 Thinking About Bets in No-Limit Hold'em ........................... 15 Quiz ................................................................................... 17 Your
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Strategic Deficiency and Poker
    Models of Strategic Deficiency and Poker Gabe Chaddock, Marc Pickett, Tom Armstrong, and Tim Oates University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department {gac1, marc}@coral-lab.org and {arm1, oates}@umbc.edu Abstract Opponent modeling has been identified recently as a crit- ical component in the development of an expert level poker Since Emile Borel’s study in 1938, the game of poker has player (Billings et al. 2003). Because the game tree in resurfaced every decade as a test bed for research in mathe- Texas Hold’em, a popular variant of poker, is so large, it is matics, economics, game theory, and now a variety of com- currently infeasible to enumerate the game states, let alone puter science subfields. Poker is an excellent domain for AI research because it is a game of imperfect information and compute an optimal solution. By using various abstraction a game where opponent modeling can yield virtually unlim- methods, the game state has been reduced but a subopti- ited complexity. Recent strides in poker research have pro- mal player is not good enough. In addition to hidden in- duced computer programs that can outplay most intermediate formation, there is misinformation. Part of the advanced players, but there is still a significant gap between computer poker player’s repertoire is the ability to bluff. Bluffing programs and human experts due to the lack of accurate, pur- is the deceptive practice of playing a weak hand as if it poseful opponent models. We present a method for construct- were strong. Indeed there are some subtle bluffing practices ing models of strategic deficiency, that is, an opponent model where a strong hand is played as a weak one early in the hand with an inherent roadmap for exploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Review of Developments Relating to Aggression
    Historical Review of Developments relating to Aggression United Nations New York, 2003 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.03.V10 ISBN 92-1-133538-8 Copyright 0 United Nations, 2003 All rights reserved Contents Paragraphs Page Preface xvii Introduction 1. The Nuremberg Tribunal 1-117 A. Establishment 1 B. Jurisdiction 2 C. The indictment 3-14 1. The defendants 4 2. Count one: The common plan or conspiracy to commit crimes against peace 5-8 3 3. Count two: Planning, preparing, initiating and waging war as crimes against peace 9-10 4. The specific charges against the defendants 11-14 (a) Count one 12 (b) Counts one and two 13 (c) Count two 14 D. The judgement 15-117 1. The charges contained in counts one and two 15-16 2. The factual background of the aggressive war 17-21 3. Measures of rearmament 22-23 4. Preparing and planning for aggression 24-26 5. Acts of aggression and aggressive wars 27-53 (a) The seizure of Austria 28-31 (b) The seizure of Czechoslovakia 32-33 (c) The invasion of Poland 34-35 (d) The invasion of Denmark and Norway 36-43 Paragraphs Page (e) The invasion of Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg 44-45 (f) The invasion of Yugoslavia and Greece 46-48 (g) The invasion of the Soviet Union 49-51 (h) The declaration of war against the United States 52-53 28 6. Wars in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances 54 7. The Law of the Charter 55-57 The crime of aggressive war 56-57 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Strategy
    15.S50 - Poker Theory and Analytics Basic Strategy 1 Basic Strategy • Terminology – Position • Pot Odds • Implied Odds • Fold Equity and Semi-Bluffing 2 Position Terminology Middle Position Late Position MP2 MP3 CO MP1 BTN D UTG+2 SB UTG+1 UTG BB Early Position Blinds 3 Position Terminology (6-handed) Middle Position Late Position MP2 XMP3 CO X MP1 BTN D X UTG+2 SB X UTG+1 UTG BB Early Position Blinds 4 Position Basics • In general, later position is preferred since you get more information before acting • Playable hands are wider for later positions • Blinds get a discount to see flops, but are in the worst position for every round thereafter • Early position offers more opportunity for aggression, and is preferred in some low-M situations – e.g. in the “Game of Chicken” situation, first actor gets to “throw the steering wheel out the window” 5 Basic Strategy • Terminology – Position • Pot Odds • Implied Odds • Fold Equity 6 Why do odds come into play? • Common situation is weak made hand vs drawing hand – i.e. pair or two pair on flop vs straight or flush draw – Or pocket pair vs anything else pre flop • Drawer has to balance chance of hitting draw vs how much each addition card costs • Made hand wants to – Bet enough for the drawer to not have a +EV call – Bet an amount that bad players might mistake as good odds 7 Pot Odds 8 9 Pot Odds John_VH925 (UTG+1): $500 Blinds 20/40 + 10 Hero (MP1): $500 Pre Flop: ($140) Hero is MP1 with A♥ T♥ 1 fold, John_VH925 raises to $120, Hero calls $120, 5 folds Flop: ($380) 8♥ 3♥ K♣ (2 players) John_VH925
    [Show full text]
  • Computing Card Probabilities in Texas Hold'em
    Computing Card Probabilities in Texas Hold’em Luís Filipe Teófilo 1,2 , Luís Paulo Reis 1,3 , Henrique Lopes Cardoso 1,2 1 LIACC – Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Lab., University of Porto, Portugal 2 FEUP – Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto – DEI, Portugal 3 EEUM – School of Engineering, University of Minho – DSI, Portugal [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract — Developing Poker agents that can compete at the level its cards are. This allows agents to adapt their decision stream of a human expert can be a challenging endeavor, since agent s’ to better manage their resources. strategies must be capable of dealing with hidden information, deception and risk management. A way of addressing this issue The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is to model opponent s’ behavior in order to estimate their game describes the game which is the domain of this paper: the plan and make decisions based on such estimations. In this paper, Texas Hold’em variant of Poker. Section 3 describes current several hand evaluation and classification techniques are methods and tools to quickly compute the rank of a hand, compared and conclusions on their respective applicability and which is essential for probabilities calculation. Section 4 scope are drawn. Also, we suggest improvements on current describes the current techniques to compute the odds of a 5 to 7 techniques through Monte Carlo sampling. The current methods card hand as well as an explanation on how to improve the to deal with risk management were found to be pertinent efficiency of these techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Poker Agents with Hand History Statistics
    Enhancing Poker Agents with Hand History Statistics Verbessern von Poker Agenten durch Hand History Statistiken Bachelor-Thesis von Andreas Li aus Aachen 23.05.2013 Fachbereich Informatik Data and Knowledge Engineering Enhancing Poker Agents with Hand History Statistics Verbessern von Poker Agenten durch Hand History Statistiken Vorgelegte Bachelor-Thesis von Andreas Li aus Aachen 1. Gutachten: Prof. Dr. Johannes Fürnkranz 2. Gutachten: Eneldo Loza Mencía, Dr. Frederik Janssen Tag der Einreichung: Erklärung zur Bachelor-Thesis Hiermit versichere ich, die vorliegende Bachelor-Thesis ohne Hilfe Dritter nur mit den angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmitteln angefertigt zu haben. Alle Stellen, die aus Quellen entnommen wurden, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Diese Arbeit hat in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch keiner Prüfungs- behörde vorgelegen. Darmstadt, den 23.05.2013 (Andreas Li) 1 Abstract Poker is one of the more recent topics in the research field of artificial intelligences. The increasing popularity of online poker has led to development of new software which helps online poker players to gain an advantage over other players. The software displays dynamically calculated statistics for each player which can help to make the right decisions at the poker table and can also help the player in finding weaknesses in their own play. In this work we want to evaluate the viability of these statistics in terms of usage in poker agents with the means of mathematical statistics and machine learning. Finally we summarize our findings and propose how these statistics can be used in poker agents. 2 Contents Contents 4 1 Introduction & Motivation 6 2 General Information 7 2.1 Introduction .
    [Show full text]