DOCSLIB.ORG

Structural Interpretation of the Southern Part of the Northern Coast Ranges and Sacramento Valley, California: Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structural Interpretation of the Southern Part of the Northern Coast Ranges and Sacramento Valley, California: Summary Structural interpretation of the southern part of the northern Coast Ranges and Sacramento Valley, California: Summary JOHN SUPPE Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 The surface geology of the northern Coast Ranges of California lief on the contacts between these major tectonostratigraphic units is dominated by structurally complex Upper Mesozoic and Lower is one of the most striking features of the surface geology of the Cenozoic rocks of the Franciscan Complex, some of which have Coast Ranges. This relief is produced in the present solution by im- undergone high-pressure metamorphism in the Late Jurassic or bricate thrust faults that flatten within the upper crust and account Cretaceous. Strata of the coeval, but generally little-deformed, for about 175 km of Cenozoic horizontal shortening of the conti- Great Valley sequence (~10 km thick) are buried under Upper nental margin, as is shown by a restored section published with the Cenozoic nonmarine sedimentary rocks in the Sacramento Valley complete article. The shortening is large relative to the present but are fully exposed in the great homocline forming the boundary width of the Coast Ranges, which is about 110 km; nevertheless it between the Sacramento Valley to the east and the Coast Ranges to is small relative to the several thousand kilometres of Cenozoic the west (Fig. I).1 The Great Valley sequence and its ophiolitic subduction to the west with which this thrusting was presumably basement are also exposed across the entire Coast Ranges in coeval (Atwater, 1970). Subduction stopped at the latitude of the numerous small fragments immersed in the predominantly Francis- cross section about 5 m.y. ago as the Mendocino triple junction can terrain; these fragments have been generally interpreted as ero- passed northward (Atwater, 1970). The thrusting took place at sionally isolated klippen of a regional "Coast Range thrust" that high-fluid pressure (Berry, 1973). places the Great Valley sequence over the more metamorphosed The section (Fig. 1) was constructed as part of the Cross-Sections and deformed coeval Franciscan Complex (see Bailey and others, Project of the Plate Margins Group, U.S. Geodynamics Committee, 1964). the purpose of which is to summarize present knowledge and to In contrast with the dominance of Mesozoic Franciscan Rocks in point the way toward future research. As a guiding principle, the the surface geology of the Coast Ranges, a new structural interpre- cross section was made as detailed and specific as possible, even at tation that involves a relatively small amount of Mesozoic Francis- some expense of certainty. In this spirit, a number of the details, can rocks at depth has been developed during the construction of a particularly at greater depth, are merely permissible solutions in deep, retrodeformable cross section of the Coast Ranges and Sac- light of present knowledge and may be proved or disproved with ramento Valley ~100 km north of San Francisco (Fig. 1). By this future data. new solution, much of the upper crust of the Coast Ranges is oc- The confidence with which the cross-sectional solution is appro- cupied by rocks of the Great Valley sequence and of the Upper Cre- priately viewed should reflect an understanding of the quality of the taceous and Cenozoic "Coastal-Belt" Franciscan, which lie struc- primary data and the methods and assumptions used in the con- turally below relatively thin (2 to 5 km) west-vergent thrust sheets struction of the section. These are discussed in the primary publi- of Mesozoic Franciscan rocks. cation, but it is important that the methods and assumptions be The thrust sheets of the new solution are not the result of any summarized here. Mesozoic subduction and metamorphism of the Franciscan Com- The near-surface structure was constructed by direct projection plex because the structure involves Lower Cenozoic strata both along the dip or plunge. Much of what is shown in the upper 5 km within the "Coastal-Belt" Franciscan and overlying the Great Val- and above the ground surface may be seen directly in distorted ley sequence. The Cenozoic thrusting is superposed on the major form if the map is viewed down the regional southeasterly plunge. Mesozoic structure for which the Franciscan is better known. The Some of the imbricate structure may be seen directly in map view main episode of thrusting represented on the cross section is later (see discussion of Suppe and Foland, 1978). In addition to the than the emplacement of the Great Valley sequence over the thrust faults, young high-angle faults, roughly parallel with the San Mesozoic Franciscan Complex and the emplacement of the Andreas fault, are exposed in the western Coast Ranges, but they Mesozoic Franciscan over the "Coastal-Belt" Franciscan because produce only nominal apparent offset in the plane of the section. the young thrusting deforms these contacts. The large structural re- Thus, they can be largely ignored in cross section, even though some may have substantial strike slip. 1 This article provides a summary discussion of the text, cross section, Deeper parts of the cross section were constructed with the con- restored section, geologic map, and gravity models published in color under straint that it be retrodeformable or "balanced"; the primary the title "Cross Section of the Southern Part of the Northern Coast Ranges and Sacramento Valley, California," Geological Society of America Map geometric constraints for the major features of the section come and Chart Series, MC-28B. Contribution of Plate Margins Group, U.S. from the volume and wavelength of the structural relief (Laubscher, Geodynamics Committee. 1965; Dahlstrom, 1969). The wavelength of the structural relief is Geological Society of America Bulletin, Part 1, v. 90, p. 327-330, 1 fig., April 1979, Doc. no. S90403. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4/327/3433888/i0016-7606-90-4-327.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 328 J. SUPPE • Calculated gravity o Calculated gravity with Franciscan at depth — Observed gravity Jurassic Ophiolite Jurassic and Cretaceous Franciscan _KJg Ts Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary Coastal-Belt Franciscan High-Velocity Lower Crust MOHO 30 km UPPER MANTLE 60 km LOW-VELOCITY ZONE Figure 1. Simplified east-west geologic cross section of the northern California Coast Ranges (to the left) and Sacramento Valley (to the right) ~ 100 km north of San Francisco. relatively short (s5 km), which requires that the associated thrust the low-velocity zone is determined from seismograph P-wave re- faults flatten within the upper crust. siduals (Nuttli and Bolt, 1969). This relief on the low-velocity zone The lower crust is detached from the upper crust and includes is caused by the northward motion of the Mendocino triple junc- seismically determined high-velocity (~6.8 km/s) non-Franciscan tion, as discussed in the complete article, and is the only feature of material (Stewart and Peselnick, 1977), which could be subducted the cross section capable of explaining the uplift of the Coast oceanic lithosphere. The dip of the Moho and lower crustal layer Ranges relative to the Great Valley. was estimated from the regional gradient in gravity. The relief on The geologic solution arrived at in cross section was tested Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4/327/3433888/i0016-7606-90-4-327.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION, COAST RANGES AND SACRAMENTO VALLEY: SUMMARY 329 r 0 -75 mgal Complex TERTIARY MARINE AND NONMARINE SEDIMENTS • - sea level (-6.8 km/s) MOHO 30 km LITHOSPHERE - 60 km Figure 1. (Continued). against the observed gravity by calculating detailed models. The Thus adjustment of neither geometry nor density was necessary in geometry specified by the cross section was not allowed to vary, the Coast Ranges and western Sacramento Valley. with two exceptions: (1) the slope of the Moho and mafic lower The most remarkable aspect of the observed gravity is the crust, and (2) the source of the Great Valley anomaly. The densities smooth gradient across the Coast Ranges, with the Coast Range- of all of the major rock units are known from measurement and Great Valley contact having no gravitational expression. This give satisfactory agreement between calculated and observed grav- smoothness is surprising because the traditional view of the struc- ity after the slope of the Moho is adjusted to the regional gradient. ture places more dense Franciscan rocks in the upper crust of the Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4/327/3433888/i0016-7606-90-4-327.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 330 J. SUPPE Coast Ranges and less dense Great Valley sequence in the Sac- thrust faults intersected by cross section segment B-B' shown as KJf ramento Valley; thus an edge anomaly, which is not observed, should also be Js. In segment A-A' of the cross section, the colors of should mark the contact between the geologic provinces. If the hid- KJfm, 3 and 10 cm northe ast of A, and of KJf, 1 cm northeast of A, den mass of Great Valley sequence in the eastern one-third of the are incorrect; formation symbols for all three areas are correct. Coast Ranges (p ~ 2,570 kg/m3) is replaced by Franciscan (p > 3 2,670 kg/m ), a positive anomaly of at least 15 to 20 mgals is REFERENCES CITED created (Fig. 1). This anomaly is not present in the observed grav- ity; thus the traditional view may not be possible. The present cross Atwater, T., 1970, Implications of plate tectonics for the Cenozoic tectonic section is permissible. evolution of western North America: Geological Society of America The 50-mgal positive gravity anomaly in the Great Valley corre- Bulletin, v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Crustal Structure of the Axis of the Great Valley, California, from Seismic Refraction Measurements
    Tectonophysics, 140 (1987) 49-63 49 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands The crustal structure of the axis of the Great Valley, California, from seismic refraction measurements W. STEVEN HOLBROOK ’ and WALTER D. MOONEY * ’ Geophysics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (U.S.A.) ’ U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 (U.S.A.) (Received March 18,1986; accepted June 151986) Abstract Holbrook, W.S. and Mooney, W.D., 1987. The crustal structure of the axis of the Great Valley, California, from seismic refraction measurements. In: S. Asano and W.D. Mooney (Editors), Seismic Studies of the Continental Lithosphere. Tectonophysics, 140: 49-63. In 1982 the U.S. Geological Survey collected six seismic refraction profiles in the Great Valley of California: three axial profiles with a maximum shot-to-receiver offset of 160 km, and three shorter profiles perpendicular to the valley axis. This paper presents the results of two-dimensional raytracing and synthetic seismogram modeling of the central axial profile. The crust of the central Great Valley is laterally heterogeneous along its axis, but generally consists of a sedimentary section overlying distinct upper, middle, and lower crustal units. The sedimentary rocks are 3-5 km thick along the profile, with velocities increasing with depth from 1.6 to 4.0 km/s. The basement (upper crust) consists of four units: (1) a 1.0-1.5 km thick layer of velocity 5.4-5.8 km/s, (2) a 3-4 km thick layer of velocity 6.0-6.3 km/s, (3) a 1.5-3.0 km thick layer of velocity 6.5-6.6 km/s, and (4) a laterally discontinuous, 1.5 km thick layer of velocity 6.8-7.0 km/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Unstable Slopes in the Franciscan Complex Terrane: Lessons Learned from Urban Quarry Slopes in the San Francisco Bay Area
    UNSTABLE SLOPES IN THE FRANCISCAN COMPLEX TERRANE: LESSONS LEARNED FROM URBAN QUARRY SLOPES IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Ted M. Sayre1 & John M. Wallace2 1Cotton, Shires & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers and Geologists, 330 Village Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95030 ([email protected]) 1Cotton, Shires & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers and Geologists, 330 Village Lane, Los Gatos, CA 95030 ([email protected]) Abstract: As the need for urban living space intensifies, an increasing number of former rock quarry sites have become prime real estate for residential living areas. This change in land use can result in inappropriate and potentially catastrophic consequences when residential structures are placed in close proximity to unstable quarry slopes that were not adequately investigated prior to development. Examples of this have occurred on the San Francisco peninsula where recent slope failures along several quarry faces serve as a testament to the variability of the Franciscan Complex terrane and the unique set of failure mechanisms associated with a given Franciscan rock type, underscoring the importance of a thorough geologic assessment prior to development. In two presented case studies, residential developments were adversely impacted by recent rock slope failures. Incomplete characterization of site geologic conditions and inadequate identification of critical slope failure mechanisms led to unsatisfactory setbacks and/or ineffective mitigation designs. The Knockash Hill development in San Francisco is underlain by thinly-bedded “ribbon” chert of the Franciscan Complex that was previously mined for roadway aggregate. The steep quarried slope, located immediately above new residential units, presented an excellent geologic exposure of bedded chert that displayed adversely oriented discontinuities and weak shale interbeds.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of the Great Valley Sequence, Eastern Diablo Range and Northern San
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of the Great Valley sequence, eastern Diablo Range and northern San Joaquin Valley, central California by J. Alan Bartow1 and TorH.Nilsen2 Open-File Report 90-226 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1990 , Menlo Park, California 2Applied Earth Technologies, Inc, Redwood City, California ABSTRACT The Great Valley sequence of the eastern Diablo Range and northern San Joaquin Valley consists of a thick accumulation of marine and nonmarine clastic rocks of Jurassic to early Paleocene age deposited in a forearc basin that was situated between the Sierran magmatic arc to the east and the Franciscan subduction complex to the west. In the western part of the basin, the sequence rests conformably on the Jurassic Coast Range Ophiolite or is faulted against the structurally underlying Franciscan Complex. Beneath the eastern San Joaquin Valley, the sequence unconformably onlaps igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Sierran magmatic arc. The sequence generally thickens westward to as much as 8-9 km in the Diablo Range, where it is unconformably overlain by late Paleocene and younger strata. The stratigraphy of the Great Valley sequence has been the subject of much work, but problems, particularly nomenclatural, remain. Lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the sequence have not gained widespread acceptance because of the lenticularity of most sandstone bodies, abrupt fades changes in subsurface and outcrops, and the lack of detailed subsurface information from closely spaced or deep wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Bigbig Sursur
    CalCal PolyPoly -- PomonaPomona GeologyGeology ClubClub SpringSpring 20032003 FFieldield TTriprip BigBig SurSur David R. Jessey Randal E. Burns Leianna L. Michalka Danielle M. Wall ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors of this field guide would like to express their appreciation and sincere thanks to the Peninsula Geologic Society, the California Geological Survey and Caltrans. Without their excellent publications this guide would not have been possible. We apologize for any errors made through exclusion or addition of trip field stops. For more detailed descriptions please see the following: Zatkin, Robert (ed.), 2000, Salinia/Nacimiento Amalgamated Terrane Big Sur Coast, Central California, Peninsula Geological Society Spring Field Trip 2000 Guidebook, 214 p. Wills, C.J., Manson, M.W., Brown, K.D., Davenport, C.W. and Domrose, C.J., 2001, LANDSLIDES IN THE HIGHWAY 1 CORRIDOR: GEOLOGY AND SLOPE STABILITY ALONG THE BIG SUR COAST, California Department of Conservation Division of Mines & Geology, 43 p. 0 122 0 00' 122 0 45' 121 30 Qal Peninsula Geological Society Qal G a b i Qt la Field Trip to Salina/Nacimento 1 n R S a A n L Big Sur Coast, Central California I g N qd A e S R Qt IV E Salinas R S a lin a s Qs V Qal 101 a Qs Monterey Qc lle Qt Qp y pgm Tm Qm Seaside pgm EXPLANATION Qt Chualar Qp Qt UNCONSOLIDATED Tm pgm SEDIMENTS Qp Carmel Qal sur Qs Qal Alluvium qd CARMEL RIVER Tm Qal Point sur Qs Dune Sand Tm Lobos pgm 0 S 0 36 30 ie ' r 36 30' pgm ra Qt Quaternary non-marine d CARMEL e S terrace deposits VALLEY a Qal lin a Qt Pleistocene non-marine Tm pgm s Qc 1 Tm Tula qd rcit Qp Plio-Pleistocene non-marine qd os F ault Qm Pleistocene marine Terrace sur sur deposits qd Tm COVER ROCKS pgm qd Tm Monterey Formation, mostly qm pgm qm pgm marine biogenic and sur pgm clastic sediments middle to qdp sur qd late Miocene in age.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry of the Great Valley Group: an Integrated Provenance Record Kathleen D
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Geosciences Faculty Research Geosciences Department 6-2014 Geochemistry of the Great Valley Group: An Integrated Provenance Record Kathleen D. Surpless Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/geo_faculty Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Repository Citation Surpless, K.D. (2014). Geochemistry of the great valley group: An integrated provenance record. International Geology Review, 57(5-8), 747-766. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2014.923347 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geosciences Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geosciences Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. International Geology Review, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2014.923347 Geochemistry of the Great Valley Group: an integrated provenance record Kathleen D. Surpless* Department of Geosciences, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA (Received 13 March 2014; accepted 8 May 2014) Sedimentary geochemistry of fine-grained strata of the Great Valley Group (GVG) in California documents a provenance signal that may better represent unstable, mafic minerals and volcanic clasts within sediment source regions than the provenance signal documented in the petrofacies and detrital zircon analysis of coarser sedimentary fractions. Geochemistry of the GVG provides an overall provenance framework within which to interpret sandstone petrofacies and detrital zircon age signatures. The geochemical signature for all Sacramento Valley samples records an overall continental arc source, with significant variation but no clear spatial or temporal trends, indicating that the geochemical provenance signal remained relatively consistent and homogenized through deposition of Sacramento basin strata.
    [Show full text]
  • Provenance of Franciscan Graywackes in Coastal California
    Provenance of Franciscan graywackes in coastal California WILLIAM R. DICKINSON Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 RAYMOND V. INGERSOLL Department of Geology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 DARREL S. COWAN Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 KENNETH P. HELMOLD Exploration and Production Research Laboratory, Cities Service Company, P. O. Box 3908, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74150 CHRISTOPHER A. SUCZEK Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225 ABSTRACT known Great Valley counterparts and were tinite, minor pelagic limestone, and rare probably derived from segments of the arc polymict conglomerate—are distinctly sub- A systematic comparison of available terrane where exposures of plutons were ordinate. detrital modes for graywacke sandstones of more extensive than within typical Great One line of thought, based in part on the the Franciscan subduction complex and for Valley sources. Higher proportions of non- work of Taliaferro (1943), holds that the coeval sandstones of the Great Valley volcanic to volcanic lithic fragments in sandy detritus in the graywackes came from sequence in the California Coast Ranges some Franciscan sandstones probably re- some unknown western landmass lying off indicates that both were apparently derived flect complex recycling processes on the the coast. Initially, of course, this supposed from the same general sources. The inferred trench slope. Diagenetic effects in many landmass was viewed as a borderland on the provenance terrane was the ancestral Sier- Franciscan suites include apparent whole- edge of North America. In recent years, ran-Klamath magmatic arc, from which sale replacement of K-feldspar by albite.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Outlier of Great Valley Sequence in Franciscan Terrain, Diablo Range, California
    Tectonic outlier of Great Valley sequence in Franciscan terrain, Diablo Range, California JANET M. BAUD ER* , ^ , • c r J ,-r • m,,,- J G LIOU I Department of Geology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 9-1 >(b ABSTRACT between the Franciscan Complex and the Great Valley sequence have long been a subject of controversy. Taliaferro (1943) thought A dismembered ophiolite, tectonically overlain by Great Valley that the Franciscan was overlain conformably by Upper Jurassic strata, rests upon Franciscan rocks southeast of Cedar Mountain in beds of the lower Great Valley sequence. Irwin (1957) disproved the northern Diablo Range. The klippe of sedimentary rocks is the this hypothesis by demonstrating that parts of the Franciscan are first reported outlier of the Great Valley sequence in the interior of Cretaceous in age. Irwin (1964) and Bailey and others (1964) noted the range. The dismembered ophiolite is composed of serpentinized that faults generally separate the Franciscan from the Great Valley ultramafic rocks, hornblende gabbro, diorite, and plagiogranite, sequence, and they suggested that the two units are juxtaposed and it is partially altered to greenschist facies assemblages contain- along a regional thrust fault, later named the Coast Range thrust ing chlorite + epidote + albite + actinolite. (Bailey and others, 1970). The Franciscan Complex northeast of the ophiolite is charac- Within the last decade, the concept of plate tectonics has revo- terized by lithologic heterogeneity, and it includes melanges com- lutionized the interpretation of Coast Range geology. According to prised of mixed rock fragments of varied metamorphic grade in- current theories, the Franciscan Complex was assembled in a sub- corporated in a pervasively sheared shale matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 96-252, Geologic Explanation Pamphlet
    Preliminary geologic map emphasizing bedrock formations in Alameda County, California: A digital database by R.W. Graymer, D.L. Jones, and E.E. Brabb U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-252 Geologic Explanation Introduction This map database represents the integration of previously published and unpublished maps by several workers (see Sources of Data) and thousands of man-hours of new geologic mapping and field checking by the authors. The data are released in a preliminary digital form to provide an opportunity for regional planners, local, state, and federal agencies, teachers, consultants, and others interested in geologic data to have the new data long before a traditional paper map is published. The authors currently plan to produce a second version of the geologic map of Alameda County that would include subdivided Quaternary units and enhanced stratigraphic description and nomenclature, both as a digital product and as a traditional paper map. The timing of release of these products, and indeed whether they will be produced at all, depends on a variety of factors, including funding, outside author control. Stratigraphy Lithologic associations in Alameda County are divided into nine assemblages; I, II, and V - XI (Assemblages III and IV occur only in Contra Costa County). As defined in Graymer, Jones, and Brabb (1994), assemblages are large, fault - bounded blocks that contain a unique stratigraphic sequence. The stratigraphic sequence differs from that of neighboring assemblages by containing different rock units (e.g. the freshwater limestone (Tlp) in Assemblage VIII is missing from the other Assemblages), or by different stratigraphic relationship among similar rock units (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Diablo State Park
    GEOLOGICAL GEMS OF CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS | GEOGEM NOTE 8 Mount Diablo State Park Ancient Seafloor From a distance Mount Diablo may resemble a volcano, but the mountain’s origin is very different, although arguably just Features: as exciting. Much of the core of Mount Diablo is made up Tectonic geomorphology of of a special rock sequence/assemblage called an ophiolite. an ophiolite and surrounding Ophiolites originate at the spreading centers of oceans and sediments and fossils where oceanic plates collide with continental plates. On Mount Diablo, the ophiolite is dismembered. During ophiolite formation, molten rock from below the oceanic crust penetrates into seafloor fractures and either slowly cools and solidifies as sheets of diabase or erupts onto the seafloor and quickly cools to form pillow basalts (as found on Mitchell Peak). Basalt and diabase are chemically the same but differ in texture due to their different rates of cooling. Outcrops of pillow basalts have rounded shapes reminiscent of randomly stacked pillows. Serpentinite, California’s official state rock, originates deep in the mantle where the surrounding materials are very hot and semi-plastic. It typically finds its way to the earth’s crust and surface by following paths of weakness and faults. Serpentinite crops out on the mountain as a narrow band of rocks northwest of the summit. Intermixed within the serpentinite are related rocks rarely found on the earth’s surface: harzburgite and pyroxenite. These coarse-grained rocks came from a layer deep below the oceanic crust called the mantle. Near Mount Diablo’s summit, rocks of the Franciscan Complex (also formed during the subduction process) crop out.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Blueschist-Bearing Chaotic Rocks in the Franciscan Complex, San Simeon, California
    Origin of blueschist-bearing chaotic rocks in the Franciscan Complex, San Simeon, California DARREL S. COWAN Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION posed on the coast south of San Simeon, California, are described here in detail, and Chaotic rocks exposed in sea cliffs south The Franciscan Complex of the Califor- the relative roles that sedimentary and of San Simeon, California, consist of sub- nia Coast Ranges is now widely regarded as tectonic processes might have played in the rounded to lens-shaped fragments of having formed during late Mesozoic sub- development of their distinctive mesoscopic graywacke, greenstone, and less abundant duction at a convergent plate boundary. fabric are discussed. I chose San Simeon for blueschist and chert dispersed in a matrix of This interpretation is supported by the my study in part because the sea cliffs af- argillite. This nonbedded mélange has been compelling spatial and temporal relation- ford exposures far superior to those inland. deformed twice. An earlier deformation, ship of the Franciscan to the coeval Great Also, the Franciscan rocks in the vicinity of Di, produced a strong northwest-striking, Valley sequence and Sierra Nevada batho- San Simeon are significant in a historical northeast-dipping foliation defined by both lith and by the striking geometrical corre- sense, for they were the first in the complex tectonically flattened inclusions and a paral- spondence of these Mesozoic petrotectonic to be explicitly characterized as chaotic, lel penetrative cleavage in argillite. Most assemblages to the inner walls of oceanic tectonic mixtures or mélanges by K. J.
    [Show full text]
  • San Andreas Fault and Coastal Geology from Half Moon Bay to Fort Funston: Crustal Motion, Climate Change, and Human Activity David W
    Field SanTrip Andreas4 Fault and Coastal Geology from Half Moon Bay to Fort Funston: Crustal Motion, Climate Change, and Human Activity San Andreas Fault and Coastal Geology from Half Moon Bay to Fort Funston: Crustal Motion, Climate Change, and Human Activity David W. Andersen Department of Geology, San José State University, Calif. Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif. Richard L. Sedlock Department of Geology, San José State University, Calif. Introduction The geology of the San Francisco Peninsula reflects many processes operating at time scales ranging from hundreds of millions of years to a fraction of a human lifetime. We can attribute today’s landscape in the San Francisco Bay area to three major processes, each operating at its own pace, but each interacting with the others and with subsidiary processes: (1) the slow, long-term motion of the North American tectonic plate as it moves relative to the northwest-moving Pacific Plate, and the smaller but important component of crustal compression between the two plates; (2) the more rapid changes in global climate during the last few million years, which have controlled the rise and fall of sea level and the succession of flora and fauna on land and along the coast; and (3) the very recent, explosive growth of human population and its related activity, as expressed in pervasive ecological impact and urbanization. The oldest rocks in the region formed nearly 170 Ma (million years ago) under conditions very different from those in the San Francisco Bay area today, and rocks that were formed far apart have been juxtaposed during their later history.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map and Structural Development of the Northernmost Sur‑Nacimiento Fault Zone, Central California Coast GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Geologic map and structural development of the northernmost Sur‑Nacimiento fault zone, central California coast GEOSPHERE; v. 15, no. 1 Scott M. Johnston1, John S. Singleton2, Alan D. Chapman3, and Gabriella Murray1 https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02015.1 1Physics Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California 93407, USA 2Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA 3 8 figures; 1 set of supplemental files Geology Department, Macalester College, St. Paul, Minnesota 55105, USA CORRESPONDENCE: scjohnst@ calpoly .edu ABSTRACT fault’s early slip evolution with respect to the juxtaposition of the Salinian and CITATION: Johnston, S.M., Singleton, J.S., Chap- Nacimiento blocks, as well as the potential that dextral reactivation of the man, A.D., and Murray, G., 2019, Geologic map and structural development of the northernmost The Sur-Nacimiento fault exposed along the central California coast Sur-Nacimiento fault may partially accommodate differential displacement Sur- Nacimiento fault zone, central California coast: (United States) juxtaposes the Salinian block arc against the Nacimiento block along the San Gregorio–Hosgri fault. Geosphere, v. 15, no. 1, p. 171–187, https:// doi .org accretionary complex, cuts out the majority of the forearc basin and west- /10 .1130 /GES02015.1. ern arc, and requires a minimum of 150 km of orogen-normal crustal excision within the Mesozoic California convergent margin. Despite this significant INTRODUCTION Science Editor: Shanaka de Silva Associate Editor: Terry L. Pavlis strain, the kinematic evolution of the Sur-Nacimiento fault remains poorly understood, with diverse hypotheses suggesting sinistral, dextral, thrust, or Accretionary complex–forearc basin–magmatic arc triads preserved in an- Received 30 May 2018 normal displacement along the fault.
    [Show full text]