DOCSLIB.ORG

Unauthorised Tapping Into Or Hacking of Mobile Communications: Follow Up

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unauthorised Tapping Into Or Hacking of Mobile Communications: Follow Up House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications: follow up Oral and written evidence 4 September 2012 Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers QPM Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 4 September 2012 HC 562-i Published on 7 November 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £4.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tom Healey (Clerk), Dr Richard Benwell (Second Clerk), Ruth Davis (Committee Specialist), Eleanor Scarnell (Committee Specialist), Andy Boyd (Senior Committee Assistant), Michelle Garratty (Committee Assistant). John Graddon (Committee Support Officer) and Alex Paterson (Select Committee Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Home Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 3276; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. List of witnesses Tuesday 4 September 2012 Page DAC Sue Akers QPM Ev 1 cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [SO] Processed: [06-11-2012 14:43] Job: 023365 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/023365/023365_o001_db_HAC 04.09.12 Unauthorised tapping corrected.xml Home Affairs Committee: Evidence Ev 1 Oral evidence Taken before the Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday 4 September 2012 Members present: Keith Vaz (Chair) Nicola Blackwood Alun Michael Mr James Clappison Bridget Phillipson Michael Ellis Mark Reckless Lorraine Fullbrook Mr David Winnick Dr Julian Huppert ________________ Examination of Witness Witness: Sue Akers QPM, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service, gave evidence. Q1 Chair: Could I call the Committee to order and hold. Likely victims need to have some other refer everyone present to the Register of Members’ additional material around them that would enable Interests where the interests of members of this hacking to take place, so would include, for instance, Committee are noted, and can I welcome, for her last a PIN number or a unique voicemail number. Also we appearance before the Select Committee, Deputy have some audio tapes, so where we have those or Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers. transcripts we include them as likely victims. Alun Michael: As these are policing issues, I perhaps As of 31 August, potential victims—people whose ought to declare, in addition to what is registered in name and phone number are in the material—are the Register of Members’ Interests, the fact that I am 3,675, of whom 1,894 have been contacted, meaning a candidate for police commissioner elections in South that unsuccessful attempts to contact on numbers are Wales in November. 1,781. Likely victims, which is the category that perhaps Members will be more interested in because Q2 Chair: Thank you. Mr Michael is noting the fact these people are likely to have been victims of that he is a candidate in the forthcoming elections in hacking, we assess to be at 1,069, of whom 658 have November for South Wales. been contacted, leaving 388 who were not contactable This is part of our regular update from the Deputy for various reasons and 23 who, for operational Assistant Commissioner, following our report last reasons, we chose not to tell. year into phone hacking. We are most grateful to you for coming here today, and we have noted the Q3 Chair: That is a higher figure than the figure you evidence that you have given to Lord Justice Leveson. gave Lord Justice Leveson, because on 23 July you If I can begin by running through some of the figures said that the number of likely victims was 702. You that you have given us in the past and some of the are giving us a figure of over 1,000 today, so it has figures that you have given to Lord Justice Leveson. grown since July. Is it because you have gone through I think you said on the last occasion, Deputy Assistant the files and you have found more names? Commissioner, that there were 4,775 potential Sue Akers: There will be an assessment taken on the victims. As of now, 2,615 have been notified. There basis of a whole range of factors and—1 are 2,160 yet to be notified. There are 702 likely victims of this, you told Lord Justice Leveson, on 23 Q4 Chair: But the figure is higher? July. Twenty-six people have been arrested, nine Sue Akers: But the figure is higher. people have been charged and therefore, according to my calculations, it will be December 2013 before all Q5 Chair: Yes, and this is because you have come the potential victims have been notified. Do you across more names? recognise those figures or do you have some new Sue Akers: This will be in the course of our figures for the Committee? investigation, as we speak to people and they get to Sue Akers: I think it would be a very useful view material, they start to identify other people that opportunity now to give you what we consider to be are in the material and lead us on to others, so it the most up-to-date figures. They are a bit of a moving grows, rather than the other way round. feast because, as we investigate and get to meet with who we think are potential victims, sometimes they Q6 Chair: As of now—because the Committee is do not turn out to be such. That is why there is a keen to know when this is all going to be concluded, fluctuation in victims. If I may start with the victims, firstly, I can say that 1 The witness later clarified: For the avoidance of doubt, the we have notified and made contact with every single evidence I gave to Lord Justice Leveson on 23 July was that “we've notified a total of 2,615, of which 702 we think are person we consider to be either potential or likely likely to have been victims”. So this should be compared victims. Potential victims we define as anybody whose with the figure of 658, not 1069. This changes the response name and phone number is in the material that we to Q4—the figure is in fact lower. cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [E] Processed: [06-11-2012 14:43] Job: 023365 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/023365/023365_o001_db_HAC 04.09.12 Unauthorised tapping corrected.xml Ev 2 Home Affairs Committee: Evidence 4 September 2012 Sue Akers QPM as I am sure you are—how many more are left to arrested in Operation Weeting, eight have now been be contacted? charged, which means that there are some who are Sue Akers: None. still awaiting a decision and others that it has been Chair: None? decided to take no further action against. Sue Akers: We have contacted over 2,500 people and Chair: Dr Huppert has a question on people notified. we are satisfied that we have made contact. There may be more to be followed up but, in actual notification Q13 Dr Huppert: Perhaps I misheard you, DAC terms, everybody has been notified. Akers. Did you say that there were some people it had been decided not to contact? Q7 Chair: You are telling this Committee today, as Sue Akers: Yes. of now— Sue Akers: We have completed the activity that the Q14 Dr Huppert: Why was it decided not to Committee were very worried about on the last contact them? occasion. Sue Akers: For operational reasons. Chair: We were. Sue Akers: I think I said we had contacted 170, and Q15 Dr Huppert: These are people whose phones you were adding names and phone numbers and were hacked but are presumably involved in some coming to very big numbers but— other way as well? Sue Akers: Yes. It is very difficult for me to disclose Q8 Chair: But you have contacted everyone you that here. think you need to contact and the total is what? Sue Akers: The total number of potential and likely Q16 Dr Huppert: Will you at some point be victims combined is 4,744, and of those 2,500 have notifying them? been contacted. The rest we can’t contact. Sue Akers: No. Q9 Chair: You have now arrested 26 people to date. Q17 Nicola Blackwood: I want to follow up on the Has that gone up since yesterday? 2,500 people that are non-contactable. At what point Sue Akers: In terms of numbers of arrests, on do you come to the conclusion that individuals are Operation Weeting, which is the phone hacking, we non-contactable? What process did you go through for have arrested 25.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unauthorised Tapping Into Or Hacking of Mobile Communications
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 1. This report is strictly embargoed and is not for broadcast or publication, in any form, before 05.00hrs, Wednesday 20 July 2011. 2. This report is issued under the condition that it should not be forwarded or copied to anyone else. 3. Under no circumstances should you distribute copies to anyone else or speak to the media before the publication time about the content of this report. 4. The report is subject to parliamentary copyright and you are not permitted to distribute, replicate, or publish further copies either in hard copy or on the internet either before or after publication. 5. If these instructions are unclear in any way please contact Alex Paterson on 020 7219 1589 or email [email protected] HC 907 Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications 3 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2011 HC 907 Published on 20 July 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Murdoch Takeover: New Evidence Indicating the Need for a Further “Fit and Proper” Review
    Before the Murdoch takeover: new evidence indicating the need for a further “Fit and Proper” review AVAAZ, 8th March 2017. Submission for Karen Bradley, Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport Introduction An acquisition of Sky Plc. by 21st Century Fox (21CF) would result in a major expansion of the influence of the Murdoch Family Trust (MFT) over Sky. In 2012 Ofcom was highly critical of the role of James Murdoch who was CEO and Chairman of News International during the period of criminal and other reprehensible conduct at that organisation. This submission details a long list of wrongdoings and criminal misgovernance that has emerged since Ofcom reviewed the licenses held by BSkyB in 2012. It also draws attention to an unfolding sexual harassment epidemic being unearthed at Fox News in the US. The Secretary of State notes in her 6th March 2017 letter1 to 21CF and Sky that 21CF’s record of compliance with the broadcasting code might reflect on the culture or corporate governance at 21CF. The “huge failings of corporate governance” at News Corporation, the precursor company to 21CF were noted in the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on News International and Phone Hacking and the Secretary of State herself acknowledges that James Murdoch’s actions during this time was a “failure of corporate governance.” The shocking scale of corporate misgovernance and criminal conduct make it incumbent upon the Secretary of State to exercise her powers under Section 58(3) of the Communications Act 2003, to refer the Sky bid on broader public interest grounds than those she currently says she is minded to exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Freedom Under Attack
    LEVESON’S ILLIBERAL LEGACY AUTHORS HELEN ANTHONY MIKE HARRIS BREAKING SASHY NATHAN PADRAIG REIDY NEWS FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM UNDER ATTACK , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. WHY IS THE FREE PRESS IMPORTANT? 2. THE LEVESON INQUIRY, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 A background to Leveson: previous inquiries and press complaints bodies 2.2 The Leveson Inquiry’s Limits • Skewed analysis • Participatory blind spots 2.3 Arbitration 2.4 Exemplary Damages 2.5 Police whistleblowers and press contact 2.6 Data Protection 2.7 Online Press 2.8 Public Interest 3. THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – A LEGAL ANALYSIS 3.1 A rushed and unconstitutional regime 3.2 The use of statute to regulate the press 3.3 The Royal Charter and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 • The use of a Royal Charter • Reporting to Parliament • Arbitration • Apologies • Fines 3.4 The Crime and Courts Act 2013 • Freedom of expression • ‘Provided for by law’ • ‘Outrageous’ • ‘Relevant publisher’ • Exemplary damages and proportionality • Punitive costs and the chilling effect • Right to a fair trial • Right to not be discriminated against 3.5 The Press Recognition Panel 4. THE WIDER IMPACT 4.1 Self-regulation: the international norm 4.2 International response 4.3 The international impact on press freedom 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 6. CONCLUSION 3 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY 4 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD BY TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM: RESTORING BRITAIN’S REPUTATION n January 2014 I felt honour bound to participate in a meeting, the very ‘Our liberty cannot existence of which left me saddened be guarded but by the and ashamed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Commissioner's Response to the Leveson Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press the Report Of
    The Information Commissioner’s Response to the Leveson Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press The report of the Leveson Inquiry into the Culture, Practice and Ethics of the Press was always going to be of great interest to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). After all, it was the Information Commissioner who took the lead in raising questions about the involvement of the press in the unlawful trade in personal data after ICO staff raided the home of the private investigator Steve Whittamore in 2003 - the start of what became known as Operation Motorman. Almost ten years on, the Inquiry’s conclusions are also of much significance for today’s ICO. Because, as well as tasking the judge with inquiring into the culture, practice and ethics of the press, the Inquiry’s terms of reference also directed him to “inquire into … the extent to which the current policy and regulatory framework has failed including in relation to data protection”. Part H of the Report, in particular, deals with the press and data protection. This includes a section setting out an analysis of Operation Motorman, a section on the ICO and the press today, and a section dealing with issues around the legal framework. It concludes with a series of recommendations for the ICO and for the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). While recognising some of the constraints placed on the ICO by the limitations of the legal framework for data protection and the resistance of the press to external regulation, there is no escaping the fact that Leveson is critical of the work of the ICO in so far as it involves regulation of the press.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Bulletinprimary.Indd
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | SUMMER 2011 Not Just a ‘Rogue Reporter’: ‘Phone Hacking’ Scandal Spreads Far and Wide The so-called “phone hacking” scandal has led to more than Murdoch Closes News of the World and a dozen arrests, resignations by top News Corp. executives Speaks to Parliament while Public and British police, the launching of several new investigations Outrage Grows over Tabloid Crime, into News Corp. business practices, and pressured Murdoch to retreat from a business deal to purchase the remaining Collusion, and Corruption portion of BSkyB that he did not own. The U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) massive ethical and legal scandal enveloped the are reportedly conducting preliminary investigations into the Rupert Murdoch-owned British tabloid News of possibility of international law violations. The FBI is reportedly the World in the summer of 2011, leading to its investigating allegations that Murdoch journalists hacked into sudden closure. New allegations arose almost the phones of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks daily that reporters and private investigators or their families. British police have teamed up with Scottish Aillegally accessed the voice mail messages of politicians, authorities to continue investigating claims of phone hacking. celebrities, and private citizens. The revelations sparked Parliament launched a formal inquiry into the scandal and has worldwide public outcry and led to sweeping law enforcement questioned top News Corp. offi cials including Rupert Murdoch investigations directed at top editors of the paper, executives and his son, James Murdoch.
    [Show full text]
  • R128 New Media
    Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... vivi SummarySummary ...................................................................................................................... 33 The purpose of our review ..................................................................................... 3 Key conclusions ...................................................................................................... 8 Summary of recommendations ............................................................................ 10 Implementation ..................................................................................................... 13 Recommendations ................................................................................................ 15 Chapter 1Chapter 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 2222 The purpose of our review ................................................................................... 22 The New Zealand context .................................................................................... 30 Our approach ........................................................................................................ 35 Chapter 2Chapter 2 The News Media’s rights and responsibilities ........................................ 3838 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 38 News
    [Show full text]
  • Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons from British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2015 Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, 55 Santa Clara L. Rev. 323 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAMING THE "FERAL BEAST"1 : CAUTIONARY LESSONS FROM BRITISH PRESS REFORM Lili Levi* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introdu ction ............................................................................ 324 I. British Press Reform, in Context ....................................... 328 A. Overview of the British Press Sector .................... 328 B. The British Approach to Newspaper Regulation.. 330 C. Phone-Hacking and the Leveson Inquiry Into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press ..... 331 D. Where Things Stand Now ...................................... 337 1. The Royal Charter ............................................. 339 2. IPSO and IM
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Hill Call: 2010
    Patrick Hill Call: 2010 Patrick Hill has a broad practice spanning the fields of fraud/regulatory, criminal, public, human rights, extradition, inquests/inquiries/investigations, asset recovery, contempt, international/immigration/EU, civil/quasi-civil, and professional discipline and licensing law. Regularly instructed in high profile and complex cases, Patrick’s recent and current instructions in these areas include: SFO Unaoil/Iraqi oil corruption/bribery prosecution Unexplained wealth order case HBOS corruption £245m prosecution News International/The Sun hacking and misconduct in public office litigation Leave.EU and Vote Leave PPERA appeals Human rights/RIPA claims before the IPT Judicial review proceedings in relation to production orders on behalf of a Russian national Private prosecution £97m confiscation proceedings $2 billion Commercial Court contempt Judicial review proceedings on behalf of ENRC Computer hacking of Gordon Ramsay Inquiry into collapse of a trial of 13 police officers Hatton Gardens jewellery burglary Max Clifford historic sexual offences 1 3 Raymond Buildings, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5BH | T: +44 (0)20 7400 6400 (24 hours) | E: [email protected] Crime and regulatory crime Patrick is regularly instructed to act for private individuals and companies in high profile and complex criminal and regulatory cases, including those with an international dimension. His practice encompasses fraud, money laundering, bribery, corruption, and misconduct in public office, as well as compute misuse, hacking and data protection
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth's Britain
    issue | june 195 2012 www.prospect-magazine.co.uk june 2012 | £4.50 $6.99 €6.90 60 years of 60 years of progress? progress? Elizabeth’s Britain Hacking scandal: it will spread 9 A$10.95 A$10.95 ISSN 1359-5024 ISSN Will Self: seduced by advertising 771359 NZ$12.50 US$6.99 US$6.99 NZ$12.50 Eliot Spitzer: back from disgrace 502057 € Stephanie Flanders: the Occupy verdict Can$7.99 6.90 Richard Dawkins: betraying Darwin 06 Foreword Britain’s brand of freedom 2 Bloomsbury place, London wc1a 2qa Publishing 020 7255 1281 Editorial 020 7255 1344 Fax 020 7255 1279 Email [email protected] [email protected] Website www.prospect-magazine.co.uk Editorial Editor and chief executive Bronwen Maddox Editor at large David Goodhart Deputy editor james elwes In the 60 years since princess elizabeth acceded to the throne, Politics editor james Macintyre Books editor David Wolf Britain has become a better place to live. More people think Creative director David Killen Production editor ollie cussen that than think the opposite (see YouGov’s extensive survey for Web intern Annalies Winny Editorial assistant tina nandha Prospect, p38); those under 40, and in London and the south, Publishing are markedly more cheerful. those who demur might read, in President & co-founder Derek coombs Publisher David Hanger simon jenkins’s panorama (p30), his reminder of past Circulation marketing director jamie Wren attitudes to women, children and gay rights and to actions now Digital marketing: tim De La salle Advertising sales director defined as crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 560 18 March 2013 No. 131 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 18 March 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 595 18 MARCH 2013 596 Caroline Nokes: In the immediate Romsey area there House of Commons have been several instances of retrospective planning applications involving Traveller sites. What reassurance can my right hon. Friend give my constituents that Monday 18 March 2013 planning law is a level playing field that applies equally to everyone and that local authorities will have more The House met at half-past Two o’clock robust powers to deal with the problem? Mr Pickles: My hon. Friend raises an important PRAYERS point. The Localism Act 2011 gives applicants a chance to appeal either the enforcement notice or retrospective planning. The problem with the previous regime was [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] that it was possible to appeal both and thereby prolong occupation of land where it was inappropriate. Bill Esterson (Sefton Central) (Lab): A developer in Oral Answers to Questions Lydiate in my constituency has made clear his plans to build in the green belt, despite the existing urban development plan making it clear that it is against the policies. Is not the best way to protect the green belt and COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT valuable urban green space to go back to a system with a more regional approach so that there is not this push The Secretary of State was asked— for development in the green belt? Green Belt Mr Pickles: The short answer is no.
    [Show full text]
  • For Distribution to Cps MOD300000712
    For Distribution to CPs A Boulton First 25 April 2012 Exhibits TABBl-7 m THE LEVESON INQUIRY INTO THE CULTURE. PRACTICES AND ETHTrS OF THE PRESS EXHIBIT TABB5 This is the exhibit TABB5 referred to in the first witness statement of Thomas Adam Babington Bolton dated 25 April 2012. MOD300000712 For Distribution to CPs Greenwich University Law Faculty 2/*^ March 2012 The UK Media & The Law in 2012 Public Lecture bv Adam Boulton INTRODUCTION I am not a law yer: I am a journalist still working in this country, and what's more one who has worked for twenty three years for an organisation. Sky News, which is ultimately managed by Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation. I have interviewed Presidents, Prime Ministers and Nobel prize winners but I've also interviewed Katie Price when she was still known as Jordan and Nancy Dell'Olio, Eric Cantona only yesterday. I've asked Cabinet ministers when they are going to resign and I've persuaded the freshly bereaved and terrorised to go on television. Up market / down market I'm proud of serving both ends, all ends, of the news market, since I believe this spectrum contributes to my audience's greater understanding of the world we live in. I'm from the private not the public sector of journalism but I have no quarrel with Lord Reith's mission statement for the BBC; "to educate, inform and entertain." MOD300000713 For Distribution to CPs At the moment the issues which have raised greatest concern about the behaviour of the media , concern only one medium - newspapers - and predominantly only one media group - News International.
    [Show full text]
  • Spooky Business: Corporate Espionage Against Nonprofit Organizations
    Spooky Business: Corporate Espionage Against Nonprofit Organizations By Gary Ruskin Essential Information P.O Box 19405 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 387-8030 November 20, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 The brave new world of corporate espionage 5 The rise of corporate espionage against nonprofit organizations 6 NARRATIVES OF CORPORATE ESPIONAGE 9 Beckett Brown International vs. many nonprofit groups 9 The Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth and GE Food Alert 13 U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Friends of the Earth, National Environmental Trust/GE Food Alert, Center for Food Safety, Environmental Media Services, Environmental Working Group, Institute for Global Communications, Pesticide Action Network. 15 Fenton Communications 15 Greenpeace, CLEAN and the Lake Charles Project 16 North Valley Coalition 17 Nursing home activists 17 Mary Lou Sapone and the Brady Campaign 17 US Chamber of Commerce/HBGary Federal/Hunton & Williams vs. U.S. Chamber Watch/Public Citizen/Public Campaign/MoveOn.org/Velvet Revolution/Center for American Progress/Tides Foundation/Justice Through Music/Move to Amend/Ruckus Society 18 HBGary Federal/Hunton & Williams/Bank of America vs. WikiLeaks 21 Chevron/Kroll in Ecuador 22 Walmart vs. Up Against the Wal 23 Électricité de France vs. Greenpeace 23 E.ON/Scottish Resources Group/Scottish Power/Vericola/Rebecca Todd vs. the Camp for Climate Action 25 Burger King and Diplomatic Tactical Services vs. the Coalition of Immokalee Workers 26 The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association and others vs. James Love/Knowledge Ecology International 26 Feld Entertainment vs. PETA, PAWS and other animal protection groups 27 BAE vs.
    [Show full text]