Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Monday Volume 560 18 March 2013 No. 131 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 18 March 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 595 18 MARCH 2013 596 Caroline Nokes: In the immediate Romsey area there House of Commons have been several instances of retrospective planning applications involving Traveller sites. What reassurance can my right hon. Friend give my constituents that Monday 18 March 2013 planning law is a level playing field that applies equally to everyone and that local authorities will have more The House met at half-past Two o’clock robust powers to deal with the problem? Mr Pickles: My hon. Friend raises an important PRAYERS point. The Localism Act 2011 gives applicants a chance to appeal either the enforcement notice or retrospective planning. The problem with the previous regime was [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] that it was possible to appeal both and thereby prolong occupation of land where it was inappropriate. Bill Esterson (Sefton Central) (Lab): A developer in Oral Answers to Questions Lydiate in my constituency has made clear his plans to build in the green belt, despite the existing urban development plan making it clear that it is against the policies. Is not the best way to protect the green belt and COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT valuable urban green space to go back to a system with a more regional approach so that there is not this push The Secretary of State was asked— for development in the green belt? Green Belt Mr Pickles: The short answer is no. The regional approach was about handing out targets that were never 1. Mr John Baron (Basildon and Billericay) (Con): met. I have the basic old-fashioned view that his constituents What recent steps he has taken to increase the power of are in a much stronger and better position to decide local authorities to tackle unauthorised development where a development should go than I am. and protect the green belt. [148136] David Wright (Telford) (Lab): There is a real problem 13. Caroline Nokes (Romsey and Southampton North) in Telford, not just with illegal Traveller encroachment (Con): What steps he has taken to increase powers of on green space but on industrial estates, which is really local authorities to tackle unauthorised development. bad for businesses. When companies come to visit Telford, [148149] they do not want to see Traveller encampments all over our industrial estates. There is a mixed land ownership The Secretary of State for Communities and Local pattern, with some owned by the local authority, some Government (Mr Eric Pickles): We have previously made privately owned and some Homes and Communities it absolutely clear that Traveller sites are inappropriate Agency land. Will the Secretary of State meet representatives development in the green belt. We are also considering and me to see whether we can toughen the law to get responses to our recent consultation on proposals to these people moved on so that businesses can operate give councils more freedom to use temporary stop effectively in Telford? notices to take swift and effective action against unauthorised caravans in the green belt and elsewhere. Mr Pickles: It is always a pleasure to meet the hon. This builds on our earlier reforms to strengthen councils’ Gentleman. As he knows, I have a soft spot for Telford. enforcement powers, increase protection for the green I spent a lot of time during the last election trying to belt, and ensure fair play throughout planning. unseat him, without any success. The point about industrial land is a good one. Telford is clearly a key strategic Mr Baron: We are very grateful locally to the Government location and, subject to the consultations, the announcement for their help during the clearance of the illegal Dale that we may or may not be about to make will help with Farm Traveller site. I know that the Government are that process. We have issued guidance to local authorities, considering a series of further measures to tackle but if my sitting down with him and local authorities unauthorised development, which is grossly unfair on to try to work something out would help, I am happy to local communities, but may I urge the Secretary of State do so. to go further than he is considering at the moment? For example, will he consider whether illegal development Council Tax Benefit should become a criminal offence, always bearing in mind what is reasonable? 2. Julie Hilling (Bolton West) (Lab): What assessment Mr Pickles: My hon. Friend has been a doughty he has made of the effect on working families of defender of his constituents and was instrumental in changes to council tax benefit to be introduced in finding a solution to Dale Farm. Should we decide to 2013-14. [148138] give councils more freedom to use temporary stop notices, subject to consultation, they would allow an TheParliamentaryUnder-Secretaryof StateforCommunities unlimited fine, which may give people pause for thought. and Local Government (Mr Don Foster): An assessment The Government are reluctant to make it a criminal of the impact of the Government’s policy framework offence. for localising council tax support is available on the 597 Oral Answers18 MARCH 2013 Oral Answers 598 Department’s website. Local authorities are responsible Local Government Finance for the design of local schemes and the assessment of their impact. 3. Nicholas Soames (Mid Sussex) (Con): What plans he has to close the funding gap between urban and Julie Hilling: In Bolton, 3,200 families will have to rural local authorities. [148139] find up to £15 a week to cover the Government’s cut in housing benefit, and they might also be affected by the 6. Andrew George (St Ives) (LD): What his policy is bedroom tax and tax credit and disability benefit cuts. on the funding gap between rural and urban local Does the Minister agree with Lord Jenkin that for my authorities; and if he will re-open the 2014-15 settlement. families in Bolton West that is a “poll tax mark 2”? [148142] Mr Foster: Council tax doubled under the previous TheParliamentaryUnder-Secretaryof StateforCommunities Labour Government and it was necessary to take action. and Local Government (Brandon Lewis): I recognise I am pleased that the hon. Lady’s local authority has the case that has been made for funding for rural developed a scheme that protects the most vulnerable authorities. In February we made some adjustments to and ensures that work pays and that, as a result, it has the financial settlement for 2013-14 and confirmed changes an additional £500,000 in the transitional grant. to sparsity top-ups. Nicholas Soames: I thank my hon. Friend for that Andrew Bridgen (North West Leicestershire) (Con): answer, but does he agree that rural authorities are due The Government have stated that all schemes must to receive, on average, a 5.58% reduction in formula contain measures that incentivise local authorities to grant, which is more than two percentage points greater ensure that recipients either stay in work or find work. than urban authorities, which are due to receive, on Does that not show that the reforms are based on average, a 3.54% reduction? Is not that actually extremely ensuring that all those who are willing to and can work unfair and not a sensible way to encourage growth in do work? the rural economy? Mr Foster: My hon. Friend is absolutely right. We Brandon Lewis: This year we changed the sparsity certainly encourage all local councils, in developing levels within the banding so that the reduction for rural their schemes, to do their utmost to protect the most areas is not as great as that for urban areas, thereby vulnerable while, as he says, ensuring that work pays. slightly narrowing the gap. I appreciate that Members who represent rural areas have made a strong case this Helen Jones (Warrington North) (Lab): Why do Ministers year for going even further, which is why we brought in keep claiming that they are freezing council tax when £9 million-odd in extra finance to help local authorities they are actually increasing it for 700,000 of the poorest servicing those rural communities with deprivation. working people in this country? Does it not say everything about the Government’s priorities that a low-paid couple Andrew George: I am grateful to the Minister for that with children will have to find between £96 and £304 a response, but surely if he will applaud Cornwall council, year, and a single working parent will have to find up to for example, for freezing its council tax this year, he £577, while they are giving a tax cut to millionaires? Is must accept that it has been persistently underfunded not the truth about this Government that, despite their despite being the poorest region of the UK. When will rhetoric, they are giving a slap in the face to hard-working Cornwall and places like it get a fair share of the people while putting out a bowl of cream for the fat available money? cats? Brandon Lewis: The hon. Gentleman is absolutely Mr Foster: May I give the hon. Lady two basic facts? right: Cornwall has frozen its council tax this year. That First, the reduction we have made in council tax benefit is good news for residents across Cornwall, and I am represents less than half of 1% of a council’s budget. pleased that the council decided to do it.
Recommended publications
  • Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm
    BURBO BANK EXTENSION OFFSHORE WIND FARM DONG Energy Burbo Extension (UK) Ltd. Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm Transponder Mandatory Zone (TMZ) Stakeholder Consultation 1 [ [31 March 2014] Burbo Bank Extension offshore wind farm DONG Energy Burbo Extension (UK) Ltd. Prepared by: Richie Hinchcliffe (Osprey CSL) Checked by: Paul Childs (Communications Manager, DONG Energy) Accepted by: Vanessa O Connell (Commercial Project Manager, DONG Energy) Approved by: Ferdinando Giammichele (Project Development Manager, DONG Energy) Issue Amendment Date Issue 1a Section 6.3.2 Class D 7 April 2014 Name & Registered Office: DONG Energy Burbo Extension (UK) Ltd. Watson, Farley & Williams LLP 15 Appold Street London United Kingdom EC2A 2HB Company No. 07307131 2 Executive Summary DONG Energy plans to develop an extension to the existing operational Burbo Bank Offshore Wind Farm in Liverpool Bay. The Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm will cover an area of 40 km2 and have an estimated generating capacity of up to 259 MW. The project development site will be located west of the operational wind farm, around 7 km north of the North Wirral coast near the village of Meols, 8.5 km from Crosby beach, and 12.2 km from the Point of Ayr on the Welsh coast. The Burbo Bank Extension Offshore Wind Farm was awarded an agreement for lease by The Crown Estate on 11th May 2010, and following extensive planning development and local consultation, DONG Energy submitted an Application for Consent to the Planning Inspectorate on 22nd March 2013. What is the issue? The presence of the Burbo Bank Extension Wind Farm would affect BAE Systems Warton (Warton) Aerodrome flying and Air Traffic Service (ATS) operations, with the most significant impact being the detection of the wind turbines by the Warton Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR).
    [Show full text]
  • Unauthorised Tapping Into Or Hacking of Mobile Communications
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 1. This report is strictly embargoed and is not for broadcast or publication, in any form, before 05.00hrs, Wednesday 20 July 2011. 2. This report is issued under the condition that it should not be forwarded or copied to anyone else. 3. Under no circumstances should you distribute copies to anyone else or speak to the media before the publication time about the content of this report. 4. The report is subject to parliamentary copyright and you are not permitted to distribute, replicate, or publish further copies either in hard copy or on the internet either before or after publication. 5. If these instructions are unclear in any way please contact Alex Paterson on 020 7219 1589 or email [email protected] HC 907 Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications 3 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Unauthorised tapping into or hacking of mobile communications Thirteenth Report of Session 2010–12 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2011 HC 907 Published on 20 July 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West
    [Show full text]
  • A Better Death in a Digital Age: Post
    Publishing Office Aims and scope Abramis Academic ASK House Communication ethics is a discipline that supports communication Northgate Avenue practitioners by offering tools and analyses for the understanding of Bury St. Edmunds ethical issues. Moreover, the speed of change in the dynamic information Suffolk environment presents new challenges, especially for communication IP32 6BB practitioners. UK Tel: +44 (0)1284 700321 Ethics used to be a specialist subject situated within schools of philosophy. Fax: +44 (0)1284 717889 Today it is viewed as a language and systematic thought process available Email: [email protected] to everyone. It encompasses issues of care and trust, social responsibility and Web: www.abramis.co.uk environmental concern and identifies the values necessary to balance the demands of performance today with responsibilities tomorrow. Copyright All rights reserved. No part For busy professionals, CE is a powerful learning and teaching approach that of this publication may be reproduced in any mate- encourages analysis and engagement with many constituencies, enhancing rial form (including pho- relationships through open-thinking. It can be used to improve organization tocopying or storing it in performance as well as to protect individual well-being. any medium by electronic means, and whether or not transiently or incidentally Submissions to some other use of this Papers should be submitted to the Editor via email. Full details on submission – publication) without the along with detailed notes for authors – are available online in PDF format: written permission of the www.communication-ethics.net copyright owner, except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Subscription Information Designs and Patents Act Each volume contains 4 issues, issued quarterly.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Bulletinprimary.Indd
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | SUMMER 2011 Not Just a ‘Rogue Reporter’: ‘Phone Hacking’ Scandal Spreads Far and Wide The so-called “phone hacking” scandal has led to more than Murdoch Closes News of the World and a dozen arrests, resignations by top News Corp. executives Speaks to Parliament while Public and British police, the launching of several new investigations Outrage Grows over Tabloid Crime, into News Corp. business practices, and pressured Murdoch to retreat from a business deal to purchase the remaining Collusion, and Corruption portion of BSkyB that he did not own. The U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) massive ethical and legal scandal enveloped the are reportedly conducting preliminary investigations into the Rupert Murdoch-owned British tabloid News of possibility of international law violations. The FBI is reportedly the World in the summer of 2011, leading to its investigating allegations that Murdoch journalists hacked into sudden closure. New allegations arose almost the phones of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks daily that reporters and private investigators or their families. British police have teamed up with Scottish Aillegally accessed the voice mail messages of politicians, authorities to continue investigating claims of phone hacking. celebrities, and private citizens. The revelations sparked Parliament launched a formal inquiry into the scandal and has worldwide public outcry and led to sweeping law enforcement questioned top News Corp. offi cials including Rupert Murdoch investigations directed at top editors of the paper, executives and his son, James Murdoch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finkelstein Inquiry: Miscarried Media Regulation Moves Miss Golden Reform Opportunity
    Vol 4 The Western Australian Jurist 23 THE FINKELSTEIN INQUIRY: MISCARRIED MEDIA REGULATION MOVES MISS GOLDEN REFORM OPPORTUNITY * JOSEPH M FERNANDEZ Laws are generally found to be nets of such a texture, as the little creep through, the great break through, and the middle-sized are alone entangled in.1 Abstract The Australian media’s nervous wait for the outcome of media regulation reform initiatives came to an abrupt and ignominious end in March 2013 as the moves collapsed. The Federal Government withdrew a package of Bills at the eleventh hour, when it became apparent that the Bills would not garner the required support in parliament. These Bills were preceded by two major media inquiries – the Convergence Review and the Independent Media Inquiry – culminating in reports released in 2012. The latter initiative contained sweeping reform recommendations, including one for the formation of a government-funded ‘super regulator’ called the News Media Council, which the media generally feared would spell doom especially for those engaged in the ‘news’ business. This article examines the origins of the Independent Media Inquiry; the manner of the inquiry’s conduct; what problem the inquiry was seeking to address; the consequent recommendations; and ultimately, the manoeuvres for legislative action and the reform initiative’s demise. This article concludes that the Independent Media Inquiry was flawed from the outset and * Head of Journalism, Curtin University. This article is developed from a presentation by the author to the Threats to Freedom of Speech Conference hosted by the Murdoch University Law School on 12 October 2012 at Perth, Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signal and the Noise
    nieman spring 2013 Vol. 67 no. 1 Nieman Reports The Nieman Foundation for Journalism REPOR Harvard University One Francis Avenue T s Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman VOL Reports . 67 67 . To promoTe and elevaTe The sTandards of journalism n o. 1 spring 2013 o. T he signal and T he noise The SigNal aNd The NoiSe hall journalism and the future of crowdsourced reporting Carroll after the Boston marathon murdoch bombings ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Fallout for rupert mudoch from the U.K. tabloid scandal T HE Former U.s. poet laureate NIEMAN donald hall schools journalists FOUNDA Associated press executive editor T Kathleen Carroll on “having it all” ion a T HARVARD PLUS Murrey Marder’s watchdog legacy UNIVERSI Why political cartoonists pick fights Business journalism’s many metaphors TY conTEnts Residents and journalists gather around a police officer after the arrest of the Boston Marathon bombing suspect BIG IDEAS BIG CELEBRATION Please join us to celebrate 75 years of fellowship, share stories, and listen to big thinkers, including Robert Caro, Jill Lepore, Nicco Mele, and Joe Sexton, at the Nieman Foundation for Journalism’s 75th Anniversary Reunion Weekend SEPTEMBER 27–29 niEMan REPorts The Nieman FouNdatioN FoR Journalism at hARvARd UniversiTy voL. 67 No. 1 SPRiNg 2013 www.niemanreports.org PuBliShER Ann Marie Lipinski Copyright 2013 by the President and Fellows of harvard College. Please address all subscription correspondence to: one Francis Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138-2098 EdiToR James geary Periodicals postage paid at and change of address information to: Boston, Massachusetts and additional entries. SEnioR EdiToR Jan gardner P.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Monday Volume 663 8 July 2019 No. 326 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 8 July 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE—The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. Stephen Barclay, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE AND MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITIES—The Rt Hon. Penny Mordaunt, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Matt Hancock, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Amber Rudd, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Executive's Report July 2020
    PRP24(20) PRESS RECOGNITION PANEL BOARD CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT – JULY 2020 Meeting: by email Status: for noting Lead responsibility: Susie Uppal, Contact details: 020 3443 7072 Chief Executive Purpose 1. The purpose of this paper is to provide an update to the Board on Executive activity since the June 2020 CE report. 2. The Board is invited to note the contents of the Chief Executive’s report. Executive summary 3. The Board is being updated in respect of organisational, financial and banking matters. Delivery updates Finance update 4. A bank-reconciled set of management accounts as at 30 June 2020 is attached at Annex A. The deficit for the period to date is £10,522 against the year to date forecast of £22,217. This represents a positive variance of £11,695 compared to the year to date forecast. The bulk of this variance (£10,175) relates to budgeted HR and recruitment costs which are still anticipated later in the year. Delivery update 5. The annual report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2020 were laid in Parliament and the Scottish Parliament on 21 July 2020 with copies provided for information to the Northern Ireland Assembly and the National Assembly for Wales. I wrote to the NAO to express appreciation for the smooth and efficient conclusion of the audit. page 1 of 3 Board recruitment update 6. The Assessment Panel held an online meeting with Green Park to review the shortlist of candidates and agreed the final group for interview. The interviews will be held on 16 and 17 September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The New UK Model of Press Regulation
    MEDIA POLICY BRIEF 12 The New UK Model of Press Regulation Hugh Tomlinson QC Matrix Chambers DECLARATION OF INTEREST The author is the Chair of the campaigning group Hacked Off and was involved in negotiations with the Government in relation to the Leveson recommendations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank the series editors for all their assistance in the preparation of this brief. The LSE Media Policy Project is funded by the Higher Education Innovation Fund 5 with additional support from the Open Society Foundation. LSE Media Policy Project Series Editors: Sally Broughton Micova and Damian Tambini Creative Commons Licence, Attribution – Non-Commercial. The licence lets others remix, tweak and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms. March 2014 LSE Media Policy Project http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/ 2 KEY MESSAGES The Leveson Report on the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press proposed a system under which the independence and effectiveness of a self-regulator set up by the press could be assured through a process of independent “audit” or “recognition”. The Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press establishes an independent Recognition Panel, which does not regulate the press, but decides whether a self-regulator meets pre-set criteria for regulatory independence and effectiveness. The Recognition Panel is independently appointed and protected from political interference by the terms of the Royal Charter and by a statutory requirement that a two-thirds majority of both Houses of Parliament is required to amend that Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons from British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2015 Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, 55 Santa Clara L. Rev. 323 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAMING THE "FERAL BEAST"1 : CAUTIONARY LESSONS FROM BRITISH PRESS REFORM Lili Levi* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introdu ction ............................................................................ 324 I. British Press Reform, in Context ....................................... 328 A. Overview of the British Press Sector .................... 328 B. The British Approach to Newspaper Regulation.. 330 C. Phone-Hacking and the Leveson Inquiry Into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press ..... 331 D. Where Things Stand Now ...................................... 337 1. The Royal Charter ............................................. 339 2. IPSO and IM
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Spooky Business: Corporate Espionage Against Nonprofit Organizations
    Spooky Business: Corporate Espionage Against Nonprofit Organizations By Gary Ruskin Essential Information P.O Box 19405 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 387-8030 November 20, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 The brave new world of corporate espionage 5 The rise of corporate espionage against nonprofit organizations 6 NARRATIVES OF CORPORATE ESPIONAGE 9 Beckett Brown International vs. many nonprofit groups 9 The Center for Food Safety, Friends of the Earth and GE Food Alert 13 U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Friends of the Earth, National Environmental Trust/GE Food Alert, Center for Food Safety, Environmental Media Services, Environmental Working Group, Institute for Global Communications, Pesticide Action Network. 15 Fenton Communications 15 Greenpeace, CLEAN and the Lake Charles Project 16 North Valley Coalition 17 Nursing home activists 17 Mary Lou Sapone and the Brady Campaign 17 US Chamber of Commerce/HBGary Federal/Hunton & Williams vs. U.S. Chamber Watch/Public Citizen/Public Campaign/MoveOn.org/Velvet Revolution/Center for American Progress/Tides Foundation/Justice Through Music/Move to Amend/Ruckus Society 18 HBGary Federal/Hunton & Williams/Bank of America vs. WikiLeaks 21 Chevron/Kroll in Ecuador 22 Walmart vs. Up Against the Wal 23 Électricité de France vs. Greenpeace 23 E.ON/Scottish Resources Group/Scottish Power/Vericola/Rebecca Todd vs. the Camp for Climate Action 25 Burger King and Diplomatic Tactical Services vs. the Coalition of Immokalee Workers 26 The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association and others vs. James Love/Knowledge Ecology International 26 Feld Entertainment vs. PETA, PAWS and other animal protection groups 27 BAE vs.
    [Show full text]