DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Guidelines on Performing a Sediment Erosion and Deposition Assessment (SEDA) at Superfund Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Guidelines on Performing a Sediment Erosion and Deposition Assessment (SEDA) at Superfund Sites 9 - 14 - ERDC TR ERDC Technical Guidelines on Performing a Sediment Erosion and Deposition Assessment (SEDA) at Superfund Sites Earl Hayter, Karl Gustavson, Steve Ells, Joseph Gailani, September 2014 John Wolfe, Tim Dekker, and Todd Redder Engineer Research and Development Development and Research Engineer Center Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) solves the nation’s toughest engineering and environmental challenges. ERDC develops innovative solutions in civil and military engineering, geospatial sciences, water resources, and environmental sciences for the Army, the Department of Defense, civilian agencies, and our nation’s public good. Find out more at www.erdc.usace.army.mil. To search for other technical reports published by ERDC, visit the ERDC online library at http://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/default. ERDC TR-14-9 September 2014 Technical Guidelines on Performing a Sediment Erosion and Deposition Assessment (SEDA) at Superfund Sites Earl Hayter and Karl Gustavson Environmental Laboratory U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 Steve Ells Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation US Environmental Protection Agency, OSRTI 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20460 Joseph Gailani Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory US Army Engineer Research and Development Center 3909 Halls Ferry Road Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199 John Wolfe, Tim Dekker, and Todd Redder LimnoTech, under contract to the US Environmental Protection Agency 501 Avis Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108 Final report Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Prepared for US Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 ERDC TR-14-9 ii Abstract This report outlines processes influencing sediment transport and describes methods to use in developing a Sediment Erosion and Deposition Assessment (SEDA) at a site designated as a Superfund site. A SEDA is a complex procedure that overlaps multiple disciplines. Processes and properties that should be assessed include sediment characteristics, groundwater movement, surface water stresses, sediment loadings, anthropogenic activity, and weather and oceanographic influences. Historical data can also provide a long-term record on evolution of the system, which is not only critical in assessing sediment erodibility, but will also support conceptual site model development. The most successful SEDA studies have been guided by a technical review panel working with a Remedial Project Manager in SEDA development. Understanding of processes at a specific site, coupled with experience from other sites, is also critical to success. DISCLAIMER: The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. All product names and trademarks cited are the property of their respective owners. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED. DO NOT RETURN IT TO THE ORIGINATOR. ERDC TR-14-9 iii Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... ii Figures and Tables ......................................................................................................................................... v Preface ...........................................................................................................................................................vii Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... viii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background and objectives ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 2 Sediment Erosion and Deposition Assessment .............................................................................. 6 2.1 What is a SEDA? ............................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Data quality objectives as a framework ....................................................................... 7 2.3 SEDA purposes and possible outcomes ....................................................................... 8 3 Conceptual Site Model ...................................................................................................................... 10 4 Fundamentals of Sediment Transport ............................................................................................12 4.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Sediment transport processes affecting erodibility ................................................... 17 5 SEDA Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 19 5.1 Project scoping ............................................................................................................ 19 5.2 Current and historical site information review ........................................................... 20 5.3 Data collection to support a SEDA .............................................................................. 22 5.3.1 Data needs for most sites ............................................................................................ 23 5.3.2 Bathymetric analysis .................................................................................................... 26 5.3.3 Hydrodynamic analysis ................................................................................................ 29 5.3.4 Geomorphology assessment ....................................................................................... 31 5.3.5 Sediment stratigraphy .................................................................................................. 33 5.3.6 Geochronology analysis ............................................................................................... 33 5.3.7 Evaluation of anthropogenic impacts ......................................................................... 35 5.3.8 Measuring sediment erodibility ................................................................................... 36 5.3.9 Measuring sediment settling velocity .......................................................................... 40 5.4 Evaluating sediment transport during a major hydrologic event .............................. 41 5.4.1 Determining hydrodynamic driving forces .................................................................. 41 5.4.2 Determination of sediment transport.......................................................................... 41 5.5 Determining the level of analysis needed at a site .................................................... 42 5.6 How to use collected data ........................................................................................... 43 5.6.1 Data analysis ................................................................................................................ 43 5.6.2 Methods and limitations of interpolation of sparse data ........................................... 44 ERDC TR-14-9 iv 6 Predicting Future Conditions with Modeling ................................................................................ 46 6.1 Model uses................................................................................................................... 46 6.2 Types of models ........................................................................................................... 47 6.3 How to determine the appropriate model level .......................................................... 48 6.4 Modeling procedure .................................................................................................... 50 6.4.1 Recommendations for performing modeling studies ................................................. 51 6.4.2 Model setup, calibration, and validation ..................................................................... 53 6.4.3 Sensitivity and uncertainty of models ......................................................................... 56 7 Using SEDA Results to Make Site Decisions ................................................................................. 58 7.1 Structured decision-making based on the SEDA ....................................................... 58 7.2 Developing remedial options and study questions .................................................... 59 7.2.1 Using the initial CSM to evaluate remedial options ................................................... 59 7.2.2 Formulating study questions to refine the conceptual site model ............................ 60 7.2.3 Extreme events and long-term trends ......................................................................... 63 7.3 Using lines of evidence to answer the study questions............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sediment Transport and the Genesis Flood — Case Studies Including the Hawkesbury Sandstone, Sydney
    Sediment Transport and the Genesis Flood — Case Studies including the Hawkesbury Sandstone, Sydney DAVID ALLEN ABSTRACT The rates at which parts of the geological record have formed can be roughly determined using physical sedimentology independently from other dating methods if current understanding of the processes involved in sedimentology are accurate. Bedform and particle size observations are used here, along with sediment transport equations, to determine rates of transport and deposition in various geological sections. Calculations based on properties of some very extensive rock units suggest that those units have been deposited at rates faster than any observed today and orders of magnitude faster than suggested by radioisotopic dating. Settling velocity equations wrongly suggest that rapid fine particle deposition is impossible, since many experiments and observations (for example, Mt St Helens, mud- flows) demonstrate that the conditions which cause faster rates of deposition than those calculated here are not fully understood. For coarser particles the only parameters that, when varied through reasonable ranges, very significantly affect transport rates are flow velocity and grain diameter. Popular geological models that attempt to harmonize the Genesis Flood with stratigraphy require that, during the Flood, most deposition believed to have occurred during the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic eras would have actually been the result of about one year of geological activity. Flow regimes required for the Flood to have deposited various geological cross- sections have been proposed, but the most reliable estimate of water velocity required by the Flood was attained for a section through the Tasman Fold Belt of Eastern Australia and equalled very approximately 30 ms-1 (100 km h-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: an Overview
    Marine Geology 345 (2013) 3–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo Sediment transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: An overview Patrick L. Barnard a,⁎, David H. Schoellhamer b,c, Bruce E. Jaffe a, Lester J. McKee d a U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA, USA c University of California, Davis, USA d San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA, USA article info abstract Article history: The papers in this special issue feature state-of-the-art approaches to understanding the physical processes Received 29 March 2012 related to sediment transport and geomorphology of complex coastal–estuarine systems. Here we focus on Received in revised form 9 April 2013 the San Francisco Bay Coastal System, extending from the lower San Joaquin–Sacramento Delta, through the Accepted 13 April 2013 Bay, and along the adjacent outer Pacific Coast. San Francisco Bay is an urbanized estuary that is impacted by Available online 20 April 2013 numerous anthropogenic activities common to many large estuaries, including a mining legacy, channel dredging, aggregate mining, reservoirs, freshwater diversion, watershed modifications, urban run-off, ship traffic, exotic Keywords: sediment transport species introductions, land reclamation, and wetland restoration. The Golden Gate strait is the sole inlet 9 3 estuaries connecting the Bay to the Pacific Ocean, and serves as the conduit for a tidal flow of ~8 × 10 m /day, in addition circulation to the transport of mud, sand, biogenic material, nutrients, and pollutants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Geology in Sediment Supply and Bedload Transport Patterns in Coarse Grained Streams
    The Role of Geology in Sediment Supply and Bedload Transport Patterns in Coarse Grained Streams Sandra E. Ryan USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado This paper compares gross differences in rates of bedload sediment moved at bankfull discharges in 19 channels on national forests in the Middle and Southern Rocky Mountains. Each stream has its own “bedload signal,” in that the rate and size of materials transported at bankfull discharge largely reflect the nature of flow and sediment particular to that system. However, when rates of bedload transport were normalized by dividing by the watershed area, the results were similar for many sites. Typically, streams exhibited normalized rates of bedload transport between 0.001 and 0.003 kg s-1 km-2 at bankfull discharges. Given the inherent difficulty of obtaining a reliable estimate of mean rates of bedload transport, the relatively narrow range of values observed for these systems is notable. While many of these sites are underlain by different geologic terrane, they appear to have comparable patterns of mass wasting contributing to sediment supply under current climatic conditions. There were, however, some sites where there was considerable departure from the normalized range of values. These sites typically had different patterns and qualitative rates of mass wasting, either higher or lower, than observed for other watersheds. The gross differences in sediment supply to the stream network have been used to account for departures in the normalized rates of bedload transport observed for these sites. The next phase of this work is to better quantify the contributions from hillslopes to help explain variability in the normalized rate of bedload transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Practice of Erosion and Sediment Transport Under Change
    water Editorial Modeling and Practice of Erosion and Sediment Transport under Change Hafzullah Aksoy 1,* , Gil Mahe 2 and Mohamed Meddi 3 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey 2 IRD, UMR HSM IRD/ CNRS/ University Montpellier, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France 3 Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Hydraulique, LGEE, Blida 9000, Algeria * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 May 2019; Accepted: 9 August 2019; Published: 12 August 2019 Abstract: Climate and anthropogenic changes impact on the erosion and sediment transport processes in rivers. Rainfall variability and, in many places, the increase of rainfall intensity have a direct impact on rainfall erosivity. Increasing changes in demography have led to the acceleration of land cover changes from natural areas to cultivated areas, and then from degraded areas to desertification. Such areas, under the effect of anthropogenic activities, are more sensitive to erosion, and are therefore prone to erosion. On the other hand, with an increase in the number of dams in watersheds, a great portion of sediment fluxes is trapped in the reservoirs, which do not reach the sea in the same amount nor at the same quality, and thus have consequences for coastal geomorphodynamics. The Special Issue “Modeling and Practice of Erosion and Sediment Transport under Change” is focused on a number of keywords: erosion and sediment transport, model and practice, and change. The keywords are briefly discussed with respect to the relevant literature. The papers in this Special Issue address observations and models based on laboratory and field data, allowing researchers to make use of such resources in practice under changing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedload Equation for Ripples and Dunes
    Bedload Equation for Ripples and Dunes GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 462-H Bedload Equation for Ripples and Dunes By D. B. SIMONS, E. V. RICHARDSON, and C. F. NORDIN, JR. SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN ALLUVIAL CHANNELS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 462-H An examination of conditions under which bed- load transport rates may be determined from the dimensions and speed of shifting bed forms UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 20 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Symbols. _______________________ ___________________ IV Bedload Transport __ ______________ . _____ ___ __ HI Abstract __ __________ ___ ___ .__._--_____._..___ HI Conclusions_______________ ________ _________ _ ____ 7 Introduction ____________________ _______ _ 1 References cited. ___________________ _ __ ___________ 9 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURES 4-7. Relation of Page FIGURE 1. Definition sketch of dunes. H2 4. V.to(V-V H5 . Vs 2. Comparison of computed bedload with 5. 6 observed bed-material load__________ 3 V-VQ g 6. h to 3. Comparison of computed and observed (V V\ bedload.___________________________ 7. qriOToV[~y~ )______ _______ 8 TABLE Page TABLE 1. Variables considered. H2 m LIST OF SYMBOLS C Chezy coefficient Ci A constant D Mean depth g Accleration due to gravity h Average ripple or dune amplitude KI, K2) Ka, KI, K5 Constants q_b Bedload, by volume or weight qr Bed material load S Slope of the energy gradient t Time V Mean velocity VQ Noneroding mean velocity Vs Average velocity of ripples or dunes in the direction of flow x Distance parallel to the direction of flow y Elevation of the bed above an arbitrary horizontal datum 7 Unit weight of the fluid 5 A transformation, 5=x Vst TO The shear stress at the bed X Porosity of the sand bed d Partial derivative SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN ALLUVIAL CHANNELS BEDLOAD EQUATION FOR RIPPLES AND DUNES By D.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Transport
    Erosion and sediment transport Lecture content Skript: Ch. VIII – rationale for understanding and modelling erosion and sediment transport processes – surface erosion – mechanisms – interaction with climate, land cover and topography – annual scale surface erosion model – sediment transport in streams – mechanisms – measurements – sediment characterisation – condition for incipient motion – sediment transport equation Hydrology – Erosion and Sediment Transport – Autumn Semester 2017 1 Erosion and sediment transport is driven • by hydrological processes in the watershed • by stream hydraulics in rivers plays an important role with regard to • evolution of landscape • loss of agricultural soils • stability of river beds • water resources infrastructures (dams, …) • natural hazards • coastal processes ⤵ Brienzersee,)Hochwasser)2005) Hochwasser/Murgang) Copyright © Philip Owens 2002 Hydrology – Erosion and Sediment Transport – Autumn Semester 2017 2 Examples of effects of erosion and sediment transport on water infrastructures • filling in of reservoirs – reduces the active volume of the reservoir intake – can put at risk the correct operation of the reservoir organs (e.g. intakes) multipurpose • river bed aggradation reservoir deposited sediments = dead volume – due to sediment deposition after a flood event – due to imbalance between sediment supply from upstream and flow energy • scour in river beds and embankment erosion – undermines the stability of river cross sections • pumps and turbines ⤵ • water supply derivations • ecosystems •
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonically Quiescent Drainage, Song Gianh, Central Vietnam 3
    1 Controls on Erosion Patterns and Sediment Transport in a Monsoonal, 2 Tectonically Quiescent Drainage, Song Gianh, Central Vietnam 3 4 Tara N. Jonell1∗, Peter D. Clift1, Long Van Hoang2, Tina Hoang3, Andrew Carter4, Hella 5 Wittmann5, Philipp Böning6, Katharina Pahnke6 and Tammy Rittenour7 6 7 1 – Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 8 LA 70803, USA 9 2 - Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Duc Thang, North Tu Liem, Ha Noi, 10 Vietnam 11 3 - School of Geosciences, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette LA 70504, 12 USA 13 4 - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck College, London, WC1E 7HX, 14 United Kingdom 15 5- Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences, 16 Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 17 6- Max Planck Research Group for Marine Isotope Geochemistry, Institute for Chemistry 18 and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, 26129 19 Oldenburg, Germany 20 7 - Department of Geology, Utah State University, Logan UT 84322, USA 21 22 Abstract 23 Keywords: provenance, erosion, monsoon, Vietnam 24 The Song Gianh is a small, monsoon-dominated river in northern central Vietnam 25 that can be used to understand how topography and climate control continental erosion. 26 We present major element concentrations, together with Sr and Nd isotopic compositions, 27 of siliciclastic bulk sediments to define sediment provenance and chemical weathering 28 intensity. These data indicate preferential sediment generation in the steep, wetter upper 29 reaches of the Song Gianh. In contrast, detrital zircon U-Pb ages argue for significant flux 30 from the drier, northern Rao Tro tributary.
    [Show full text]
  • Maggie Williams Particle Size, Shape and Sorting: What Grains Can Tell Us
    Particle size, shape and sorting: what grains can tell us Maggie Williams Most sediments contain particles that have a range of sizes, so the mean or average grain size is used in description. Mean grain size of loose sediments is measured by size analysis using sieves Grain size >2mm Coarse grain size (Granules<pebble<cobbles<boulders) 0.06 to 2mm Medium grain size Sand: very coarse-coarse-medium-fine-very fine) <0.06mm Fine grain size (Clay<silt) Difficult to see Remember that for sediment sizes > fine sand, the coarser the material the greater the flow velocity needed to erode, transport & deposit the grains Are the grains the same size of different? What does this tell you? If grains are the same size this tells you that the sediment was sorted out during longer transportation (perhaps moved a long distance by a river or for a long time by the sea. If grains are of different sizes the sediment was probably deposited close to its source or deposited quickly (e.g. by a flood or from meltwater). Depositional environments Environment 1 Environment 2 Environment 3 Environment 4 Environment 5 Environment 6 Sediment size frequency plots from different depositional environments • When loose sediment collected from a sedimentary environment is washed and then sieved it is possible to measure the grain sizes in the sediment accurately. • The grain size distribution may then be plotted as a histogram or as a cumulative frequency curve. • Sediments from different depositional environments give different sediment size frequency plots. This shows the grain size distribution for a river sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a Contourite Depositional System on the Demerara Plateau: Results from Geophysical Data and Sediment Cores
    1 Marine Geology Achimer August 2016, Volume 378, Pages 56-73 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2016.01.003 http://archimer.ifremer.fr http://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00308/41957/ © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Description of a contourite depositional system on the Demerara Plateau: Results from geophysical data and sediment cores Tallobre Cédric 1, 2, *, Loncke Lies 1, 2, Bassetti Maria-Angela 1, 2, Giresse Pierre 1, 2, Bayon Germain 3, Buscail Roselyne 1, 2, Durrieu De Madron Xavier 1, 2, Bourrin François 1, 2, Vanhaesebroucke Marc 1, 2, Sotin Christine 1, 2, Iguanes Scientific Party 1 Univ. Perpignan Via Domitia, Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens (CEFREM), UMR 5110, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan, France 2 CNRS, Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens (CEFREM), UMR 5110, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, 66860 Perpignan, France 3 IFREMER, Unité de Recherche Géosciences Marines, 29280 Plouzané, France * Corresponding author : Cédric Tallobre, email address : [email protected] Abstract : The Demerara Plateau, belonging to the passive transform margin of French Guiana, was investigated during the IGUANES cruise in 2013. The objectives of the cruise were to explore the poorly-known surficial sedimentary column overlying thick mass transport deposits as well as to understand the factors controlling recent sedimentation. The presence of numerous bedforms at the seafloor was observed thanks to newly acquired IGUANES bathymetric, high resolution seismic and chirp data, while sediment cores allowed the characterization of the deposits covering the mass transport deposits. Modern oceanographic conditions were determined in situ, using mooring monitoring over a 10-month period.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeolian Sediment Transport and Natural Dune Development, Skodbjerge, Denmark
    Aeolian Sediment Transport and Natural Dune Development, Skodbjerge, Denmark January 2020 Project Building with Nature (EU-InterReg) Start date 01.11.2016 End date 01.07.2020 Project manager (PM) Ane Høiberg Nielsen Project leader (PL) Per Sørensen Project staff (PS) Henrik Vinge Karlsson and Britt Gadsbølle Larsen Time registering 402412 Approved date 27.01.2020 Signature Report Aeolian sediment transport and natural dune development, Skodbjerge, Denmark. Author Henrik Vinge Karlsson and Britt Gadsbølle Larsen Keyword Aeolian sediment transport, Aeolian sedimentary budget, Skodbjerge, Dune development, Building with nature, Distribution www.kyst.dk, www.northsearegion.eu/building-with-nature/ Kystdirektoratet, BWN Krogen, 2018 Referred to as Kystdirektoratet (2020), Aeolian sediment transport and natural dune de- velopment, Skodbjerge, Denmark. Lemvig. 2 Aeolian Sediment Transport and Natural Dune Development, Skodbjerge, Denmark Abstract This study is part of the EU-InterReg project Building with Nature. The focus of this report is the natural development of a 3.7 km dune stretch at Skodbjerge located on the North Sea coast of Denmark. Since 2005, the designated study area has been subject to high-resolution digital elevation mappings (DEMs). The DEMs derive from LIDAR scans and serve as primary data resource throughout this report. Previous analyses of the coast assume that sediment accumulation inland of the dune top could be dis- regarded when analyzing the sedimentary budget of the coast, as the volumes in question were consi- dered insignificant. The analysis of this report suggests otherwise, as considerable amounts of sediment accumulated in the area leeward of the dune crest during the study period. Findings are based on the changes in elevation over time, obtained by analyzing the DEMs and thereby determining the sedimen- tary budget between dune face and dune leeside.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Flow, Sediment Transport, and Sediment Mobility of the Lower Coeur D’Alene River, Idaho
    Prepared in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Basin Environmental Improvement Commission, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Simulation of Flow, Sediment Transport, and Sediment Mobility of the Lower Coeur d’Alene River, Idaho Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5093 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Simulation of Flow, Sediment Transport, and Sediment Mobility of the Lower Coeur d’Alene River, Idaho By Charles Berenbrock and Andrew W. Tranmer Prepared in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Basin Environmental Improvement Commission, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5093 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Berenbrock, Charles, and Tranmer, A.W., 2008, Simulation of flow, sediment transport, and sediment mobility of the Lower Coeur d’Alene River, Idaho: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Numerical Modeling of Sediment Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers
    water Article Advanced Numerical Modeling of Sediment Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers Van Hieu Bui 1,2,* , Minh Duc Bui 1 and Peter Rutschmann 1 1 Institute of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Technische Universität München, Arcisstrasse 21, D-80333 München, Germany; [email protected] (M.D.B.); [email protected] (P.R.) 2 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Thuyloi University, 175 Tay Son, Dong Da, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-152-134-15987 Received: 15 February 2019; Accepted: 13 March 2019; Published: 17 March 2019 Abstract: Understanding the alterations of gravel bed structures, sediment transport, and the effects on aquatic habitat play an essential role in eco-hydraulic and sediment transport management. In recent years, the evaluation of changes of void in bed materials has attracted more concern. However, analyzing the morphological changes and grain size distribution that are associated with the porosity variations in gravel-bed rivers are still challenging. This study develops a new model using a multi-layer’s concept to simulate morphological changes and grain size distribution, taking into account the porosity variabilities in a gravel-bed river based on the mass conservation for each size fraction and the exchange of fine sediments between the surface and subsurface layers. The Discrete Element Method (DEM) is applied to model infiltration processes and to confirm the effects of the relative size of fine sediment to gravel on the infiltration depth. Further, the exchange rate and the bed porosity are estimated while using empirical formulae. The new model was tested on three straight channels.
    [Show full text]