DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison of Electricity Prices in Major North American Cities 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison of Electricity Prices in Major North American Cities 2020 2020 Comparison of Electricity Prices in Major North American Cities Rates in effect April 1, 2020 hydro quebec .com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 METHOD 9 HIGHLIGHTS 11 Residential Customers 11 Small-Power Customers 12 Medium-Power Customers 13 Large-Power Customers 16 DETAILED TABLES 1 Summary Tables (excluding taxes) 19 2 Summary Tables (including taxes) 25 3 Detailed Tables – Residential 31 4 Detailed Tables – Small Power 37 5 Detailed Tables – Medium Power 43 6 Detailed Tables – Large Power 49 APPENDICES A Rate Adjustments 55 B Time-of-Use Rates Adjustment Clauses 59 C Applicable Taxes 65 D Utilities in the Study 73 1 INTRODUCTION Every year, Hydro-Québec compares the monthly electricity bills of Québec customers in the residential, commercial, institutional and industrial sectors with those of customers of the various utilities serving 21 major North American cities. This report details the principal conclusions of this comparative analysis of prices in effect on April 1, 2020. There are three sections. The first describes the method used to estimate electricity bills. The second examines the highlights of the seven consumption levels analyzed, with the help of charts. Finally, the third presents the results of the 21 consumption levels for which data were collected and compiled in the form of summary and detailed tables. The most recent rate adjustments, time-of-use rates, adjustment clauses and applicable taxes, as well as a profile of the utilities in the study, appear in separate appendices. 3 MAJOR NORTH AMERICAN CITIES AVERAGE PRICES FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS1,2 (IN ¢/k W h)3 1927 Privy Council border (not final) St. John’s, N L: 13.60 Edmonton, A B: 14.29 Vancouver, B C: 11.51 Charlottetown, P E: 16.83 Calgary, A B: 14.83 Moncton, N B: 13.42 Seattle, W A: 17.83 Regina, S K: 16.51 Halifax, N S: 16.89 Winnipeg, M B: 9.60 Montréal, Q C: 7.30 Portland, O R: 14.62 Ottawa, O N: 10.29 Toronto, O N: 11.10 Boston, M A: 34.28 Detroit, M I: 24.02 New York, N Y: 33.68 Chicago, I L: 19.13 San Francisco, C A: 36.66 Nashville, T N: 16.60 Abbreviations Used AB Alberta BC British Columbia CA California Houston, T X: 15.96 FL Florida IL Illinois Miami, F L: 13.31 MA Massachusetts MB Manitoba MI Michigan NB New Brunswick NL Newfoundland and Labrador NS Nova Scotia NY New York ON Ontario OR Oregon 1) For a monthly consumption of 1,000 k W h; rates in effect April 1, 2020. PE Prince Edward Island 2) Average prices excluding taxes. QC Québec 3) In Canadian currency. SK Saskatchewan TN Tennessee TX Texas WA Washington 4 MAJOR NORTH AMERICAN CITIES AVERAGE PRICES FOR LARGE-POWER CUSTOMERS1,2 (IN ¢/k W h)3 1927 Privy Council border (not final) St. John’s, N L: 9.12 Edmonton, A B: 10.64 Vancouver, B C: 7.84 Charlottetown, P E: 9.51 Calgary, A B: 9.73 Moncton, N B: 8.13 Seattle, W A: 12.04 Regina, S K: 8.98 Halifax, N S: 10.72 Winnipeg, M B: 5.53 Montréal, Q C: 5.20 Portland, O R: 8.77 Ottawa, O N: 11.36 Toronto, O N: 11.23 Boston, M A: 21.15 Detroit, M I: 9.08 New York, N Y: 12.60 Chicago, I L: 7.90 San Francisco, C A: 17.77 Nashville, T N: 11.59 Abbreviations Used AB Alberta BC British Columbia CA California Houston, T X: 10.09 FL Florida IL Illinois Miami, F L: 8.76 MA Massachusetts MB Manitoba MI Michigan NB New Brunswick NL Newfoundland and Labrador NS Nova Scotia NY New York ON Ontario OR Oregon 1) For a monthly consumption of 3,060,000 k W h and a power demand of 5,000 k W; PE Prince Edward Island rates in effect April 1, 2020. QC Québec 2) Average prices excluding taxes. SK Saskatchewan 3) In Canadian currency. TN Tennessee TX Texas WA Washington 5 MAJOR CANADIAN CITIES OVERVIEW OF CHANGES IN AVERAGE PRICES FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS (IN ¢/k W h) – 2016 TO 20201,2,3,4 ¢/k W h 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 AVERAGE PRICES FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS (IN ¢/k W h)1,2,3,4 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Canadian Cities Montréal, Q C 7.23 7.07 7.13 7.30 7.30 Calgary, A B 10.40 10.45 15.79 15.74 14.83 Charlottetown, P E 16.02 16.42 16.83 16.83 16.83 Edmonton, A B 10.37 10.34 14.35 14.68 14.29 Halifax, N S 15.88 16.15 16.41 16.69 16.89 Moncton, N B 12.50 12.97 12.97 13.10 13.42 Ottawa, O N 16.15 15.21 12.16 12.04 10.29 Regina, S K 14.65 15.94 16.51 16.51 16.51 St. John’s, N L 11.96 11.15 12.03 12.80 13.60 Toronto, O N 17.81 16.32 13.24 13.89 11.10 Vancouver, B C 10.70 11.08 11.42 11.62 11.51 Winnipeg, M B 8.43 8.71 9.00 9.37 9.60 1) For a monthly consumption of 1,000 k W h. 2) In Canadian currency. 3) Data from Comparison of Electricity Prices in Major North American Cities publications, Hydro-Québec, 2016-2020. 4) Average prices excluding taxes. 6 MAJOR CANADIAN CITIES OVERVIEW OF CHANGES IN AVERAGE PRICES FOR LARGE-POWER CUSTOMERS (IN ¢/k W h) – 2016 TO 20201,2,3,4 ¢/k W h 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 AVERAGE PRICES FOR LARGE-POWER CUSTOMERS (IN ¢/k W h)1,2,3,4 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Canadian Cities Montréal, Q C 5.17 5.18 5.18 5.20 5.20 Calgary, A B 4.82 6.09 8.32 11.97 9.73 Charlottetown, P E 9.12 9.31 9.51 9.51 9.51 Edmonton, A B 6.78 7.68 8.53 12.80 10.64 Halifax, N S 10.02 10.14 10.26 10.39 10.72 Moncton, N B 7.60 7.86 7.86 7.93 8.13 Ottawa, O N 12.91 12.46 10.80 11.57 11.36 Regina, S K 7.97 8.67 8.98 8.98 8.98 St. John’s, N L 7.88 6.95 7.84 8.52 9.12 Toronto, O N 13.04 14.55 10.66 11.91 11.23 Vancouver, B C 7.35 7.54 7.77 7.91 7.84 Winnipeg, M B 4.85 5.01 5.18 5.39 5.53 1) For a monthly consumption of 3,060,000 k W h and a power demand of 5,000 k W. 2) In Canadian currency. 3) Data from Comparison of Electricity Prices in Major North American Cities publications, Hydro-Québec, 2016-2020. 4) Average prices excluding taxes. 7 METHOD GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION In addition to Hydro-Québec, this comparative analysis Electricity distributors sometimes offer different rates of electricity prices across North America includes in the various cities they serve. As well, taxes may vary 22 utilities: 12 serving the principal cities in the 9 other from one region to another. This, however, is not the case Canadian provinces, and 10 utilities in American states. in Québec, where, with the exception of territories north The results are based, in part, on a survey to which of the 53rd parallel, taxes and rates are applied uniformly. 14 utilities responded, and in part on estimates of bills For the purposes of this study, the bill calculations calculated by Hydro-Québec. estimate as closely as possible the actual electricity bills The results presented here show the total bill for various of consumers in each target city, based on rates in effect consumption levels. If the bill is calculated according to on April 1, 2020. an unbundled rate, it includes all components, including supply, transmission and distribution. TIME-OF-USE RATES PERIOD COVERED The rates offered by some utilities vary depending on the season and/or time of day when energy is consumed. Monthly bills have been calculated based on rates in effect In the United States, for example, a number of utilities set a on April 1, 2020. The most recent rate adjustments applied higher price in summer, when demand for air-conditioning by the Canadian utilities in the study between April 1, 2019, is stronger. In Québec, on the other hand, demand and April 1, 2020, are shown in Appendix A. increases in winter because of heating requirements. Thus, for some utilities, April 1 may fall within a period in the year when the price is high, whereas for others it falls in a period when the price is low. An annual average price CONSUMPTION LEVELS has therefore been calculated in the case of utilities with time-of-use rates, which are listed in Appendix B. Seven consumption levels were selected for analysis. However, data were collected for 21 consumption levels and those results are presented in the Detailed Tables. ADJUSTMENT CLAUSES The rates of some distributors include adjustment clauses TAXES that allow them to adjust their customers’ electricity bills according to changes in different variables. Since these adjustments may be applied monthly, or over a longer With the exception of the bills presented in Section 2, period, the electricity bills issued by a given distributor taxes are not included in any of the calculations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RESETTING the SWITCH on ITS Headlines for a Refit Extraction of Minerals and Gases.” Look at What the Business Case Actually Is, Dept
    D16 Pages 33-48:Layout 5 12/13/10 11:14 AM Page 2 E D D 7.75 7.875 7.875 New Brunswick In 1983, the Point solutions that work. As for the potential of The Mactaquac Dam is Lepreau generating Brunswick. In particular, the expansion of a hydroelectric dam built SPECIAL REPORT station was the first the natural gas sector in an environmentally building a second nuclear reactor, this is an on New Brunswick’s CANDU 6 nuclear idea that is on my desk, for sure. But I think Saint John River. It reactor in the world to responsible manner will be promoted. New generates approximately achieve commercial regulations will be developed under the everyone understands that we’re going to 20 per cent of New operation. In recent Brunswick’s power. years, it’s made Petroleum Act to govern the exploration and have to reset the whole process and take a Photo courtesy NB RESETTING THE SWITCH ON ITS headlines for a refit extraction of minerals and gases.” look at what the business case actually is, Dept. of Energy. that is both years behind schedule and Of course, none of this will be easy, as and move forward from there. The key thing millions of dollars Craig Leonard told Atlantic Business we have to remember in New Brunswick is over budget. The refurbishment is Magazine in an interview not long ago. The that Lepreau, itself, is a great asset.” expected to be Apart from this, however, Leonard and completein 2012. province’s new Minister of Energy and the Photo courtesy NB Minister responsible for the Energy other energy experts in New Brunswick Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • First Quarter Report
    FIRST QUARTER REPORT YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS For the period ended June 30, 2018 NEW BRUNSWICK POWER CORPORATION OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS Energy providers across the world are experiencing unprecedented change. Some of the global trends driving this change include– climate change, changes in customer expectations and behaviours, digitalization, aging infrastructures, competition, and more. As a result, NB Power is compelled to conduct business differently in order to help ensure adequate energy supply, meet customer expectations, integrate renewable resources, and provide low and stable rates. NB Power remains committed to meeting the needs of New Brunswickers in a safe, reliable and cost effective way. In recent years, New Brunswick has seen a rise in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. Spring 2018 brought historic flood levels to New Brunswick impacting thousands of homes, cottages and businesses. During the almost three-week long flood, NB Power personnel worked closely with New Brunswick Emergency Measures Organization to ensure customers’ safety and then worked diligently to reconnect customers once it was safe to do so. Although water can be a low cost source of energy for NB Power, when it comes in high volumes over short periods of time, like this spring, it cannot be used efficiently to generate electricity. NB Power is reviewing the impact of extreme weather events on its infrastructure and operations and is taking many steps to harden and improve its system to protect electricity supply for customers. NB Power is committed to helping all New Brunswickers with their energy use to help save money and reduce their energy needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 10-Year System Outlook
    Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended 2020 10-Year System Outlook NS Power June 30, 2020 NON-CONFIDENTIAL 2020 10-Year System Outlook NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 4 2.0 LOAD FORECAST ............................................................................................................. 7 5 3.0 GENERATION RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 11 6 3.1 Existing Generation Resources ................................................................................................... 11 7 3.1.1 Maximum Unit Capacity Rating Adjustments .................................................................... 13 8 3.1.2 Mersey Hydro ..................................................................................................................... 14 9 3.1.3 Wreck Cove Hydro ............................................................................................................. 14 10 3.2 Changes in Capacity ................................................................................................................... 15 11 3.2.1 Tusket Combustion Turbine ................................................................................................ 15 12 3.2.2 Victoria Junction Combustion Turbine ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Utilities Act
    Public Utilities Act CHAPTER 380 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 1992, c. 8, s. 35; 1992, c. 11, s. 43; 1992, c. 37, s. 3; 1997, c. 4, s. 43; 2001, c. 35, s. 30; 2005, c. 25, s. 1; 2006, c. 45; 2008, c. 31; 2010, cc. 24, 71; 2012, c. 41; 2014, c. 5, s. 15; 2015, c. 31, ss. 29-33; 2019, c. 38 © 2019 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published by Authority of the Speaker of the House of Assembly Halifax This page is intentionally blank. CHAPTER 380 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 amended 1992, c. 8, s. 35; 1992, c. 11, s. 43; 1992, c. 37, s. 3; 1997, c. 4, s. 43; 2001, c. 35, s. 30; 2005, c. 25, s. 1; 2006, c. 45; 2008, c. 31; 2010, cc. 24, 71; 2012, c. 41; 2014, c. 5, s. 15; 2015, c. 31, ss. 29-33; 2019, c. 38 An Act to Regulate Public Utilities title amended 1992, c. 11, s. 43. Table of Contents (The table of contents is not part of the statute) Section Short title........................................................................................................................................... 1 Interpretation..................................................................................................................................... 2 Powers and Duties of the Board Expenses of Board ............................................................................................................................ 15 Payment and recovery of amount assessed....................................................................................... 16 Expenses of annual report................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of CEA Members Corporate Utility Members Corporate Partner Members CEA Councils Associate Members News
    HOME CON TACT U S FRAN ÇAIS s e arch s ite Abo ut CEA Indus try Is s ue s Re s o urce s Indus try Eve nts Students & Membership Policy Consumers Media Industry Careers Teachers Ho m e > Abo ut CEA > List o f CEA Me m be rs About CEA CEA MEMBERSHIP LIST CEA Board of Directors CEA maintains three member categories to address the needs and diverse interests of CEA Subject Matter Principals stakeholders operating within the electricity industry. Click on the categories below to view the list of members associated with each group. Membership List of CEA Members Corporate Utility Members Corporate Partner Members CEA Councils Associate Members News Employment Opportunities CORPORATE UTILITY MEMBERS Contact Us AltaLink ATCO Electric ATCO Power BC Hydro and Power Authority Brookfield Renewable Energy Group Capital Power City of Medicine Hat Electric Utility Columbia Power Corporation Emera Inc. ENMAX Corporation EnWin Utilities Ltd. EPCOR Utilities Inc. FortisAlberta Inc. FortisBC Inc. Horizon Utilities Corporation Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc. Hydro One Inc. Hydro Ottawa Manitoba Hydro Maritime Electric Company, Limited Nalcor Energy New Brunswick Power Corporation Newfoundland Power Inc. Northwest Territories Power Corporation Nova Scotia Power Inc. Oakville Enterprises Corporation Ontario Power Generation PowerStream Inc. Saint John Energy Saskatoon Light & Power SaskPower Toronto Hydro Corporation TransCanada Yukon Energy Corporation CORPORATE PARTNER MEMBERS ABB Inc. Accenture Alberta Electric System Operator Algonquin Power and Utility Corp. Allteck Line Contractors Inc. Alstom Grid Canada ULC Altus Group Limited Amec Foster Wheeler Andritz Hydro Canada Inc. Armtec LP Awz Ventures Inc. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group Canada Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    2019/20 ANNUAL REPORT NEW BRUNSWICK POWER CORPORATION SUBMISSION LETTER June 2020 Honourable Mike Holland Minister of Natural Resources and Energy Development Province of New Brunswick PO Box 6000 Fredericton NB E3B 5H1 Minister, I am pleased to submit the Annual Report of New Brunswick Power Corporation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 in compliance with Section 42 of the Electricity Act. Ed Barrett Chair, Board of Directors On the cover Power system operators like Nicole Cleghorn at our Energy Control Centre in Marysville help keep the transmission system running reliably, no matter the hour of the day. The Energy Control Centre is the energy hub for the province and keeps every business, hospital and home in New Brunswick connected. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Message from the Chairman 3 Message from the President 5 Governance 10 Report on Performance 23 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 47 Consolidated Financial Statements 114 Statistical Overview NEW BRUNSWICKERS POWERING NEW BRUNSWICK NB Power maintains one of the most diverse generation fleets in North America, with a combined total generating capacity of 3,790 MW plus additional installed capacity of 329 MW of wind and 259 MW of other renewable capacity provided by third parties through Purchase Power Agreements (PPAs). NB Power is responsible for the generation, reaching its highest peaks in the cold winter transmission, and distribution of electricity that months. To meet the wide swing in demand and powers the lives and livelihoods of more than make sure New Brunswickers have the power 400,000 customers across New Brunswick. they need when they need it, NB Power maintains standby generation with extra capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Expansion of the Lingan Wind Farm Project Registration and Environmental Assessment June 2012
    Expansion of the Lingan Wind Farm Project Registration and Environmental Assessment June 2012 SP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a subsidiary of Sprott Power Corp. 11-5625-2000 Submitted by: Dillon Consulting Limited SP Development Limited Partnership - Expansion of the Lingan Wind Farm Registration and Environmental Assessment June 2012 REGISTRATION OF a 9.2-MEGAWATT EXPANSION OF THE LINGAN WIND FARM, LINGAN, NOVA SCOTIA This document represents formal registration of a 9.2 MW expansion of the Lingan Wind Farm located on lands between the communities of New Waterford and Lingan, Nova Scotia (the project) by SP Development Limited Partnership, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprott Power Corp. (referred to as Sprott in this document) to meet the requirements of the Nova Scotia Environmental Assessment Regulations, as defined under Section 9 of the Regulations. Name of Undertaking Expansion of the Lingan Wind Farm, Lingan, Nova Scotia Location of the Undertaking The project is situated between the urban community of New Waterford and the suburban community of Lingan on lands formerly used primarily for coal mining by the Cape Breton Development Corporation and its predecessors. Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) operates the Lingan Generating Station adjacent to the project site. The project is proposed for vacant lands which are currently owed by Sprott (or its subsidiaries) and Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation (ECBC). Refer to Figure i and Figure ii for the regional and local context of the project location. The following summarizes the property identification and ownership for the parcels proposed for this project: Property Identification Ownership Number ( PID) 15501141 Enterprise Cape Breton Corp 15501166 Enterprise Cape Breton Corp 15827520 GBL Wind Power (Phase II) Limited (a subsidiary of Sprott Power Corp) 15772999 Glace Bay Lingan Wind Power LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Scotia Power Inc. 2020 Integrated Resource Plan DRAFT REPORT
    Nova Scotia Power Inc. 2020 Integrated Resource Plan DRAFT REPORT October 30, 2020 Table of Contents 1 IRP Summary .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Nova Scotia Power’s System Transformation ................................. 1 1.3 Evolving Planning Landscape ............................................................ 4 1.4 Planning Objectives .............................................................................. 5 1.5 The IRP Planning Process .................................................................. 6 1.6 Exploring a Diverse Set of Scenarios ............................................... 8 1.7 Developing Optimal Resource Plans .............................................. 11 1.8 Overview of Key Findings .................................................................. 14 1.9 Overview of Action Plan and Roadmap .......................................... 23 1.10 Going Forward ..................................................................................... 27 2 IRP Introduction and Process............................................................. 28 2.1 Nova Scotia Power’s Mission ........................................................... 28 2.2 Objectives of the IRP.......................................................................... 28 2.3 Process for the IRP ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of HQ Purchase Delivery
    An Assessment of the Costs and Issues Associated with the Delivery of a Purchase from Hydro Quebec Prepared By WKM Energy Consultants Inc December 2012 Prepared by WKM Energy Consultants Inc 0 An Assessment of the Costs and Issues Associated with the Delivery of a Purchase from Hydro Quebec Table of Contents Report 1. Background ……………………………………………………..…………….…...2 2. Executive Summary…..…………………………………………………….……...2 3. Future Nova Scotia Electricity Needs ...………………………………..………...4 4. Available Transmission Access Through New Brunswick For a HQ Purchase ............................................................….……….………...6 5. Potential Transmission Upgrades ………………………...………….……...…...8 6. Potential Transmission Supply Alternatives For Nova Scotia………………...11 7. Transmission Cost Allocation .…………………………………………………..12 8. Transmission Cost Recovery…………………………………………………….14 9. Other Considerations........………………………………………………….…....16 10. Conclusions...………………………………………………………………….…..17 APPENDIX A – NB Transmission Tariff Model .…………………………………..19 List of Figures Figure 1 – Summary Results of Transmission Upgrades and Cost Allocation.........3 Figure 2 - NBSO Transmission Capabilities in MW .…………………….….……...7 Figure 3 - Map of Potential Transmission Upgrades .................................................9 Figure 4 - Transmission Upgrade Costs and Capabilities……….………………....11 Figure 5 – Nova Scotia Supply Alternatives - Costs and Capabilities…….…........ .12 Figure 6 – Cost Allocation of Supply Alternatives ...................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Canadian Electric Power Generation Sector
    2. CANADIAN ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION SECTOR The following section provides an overview of the existing EGUs in Canada. The units’ state of operation including fuel utilization and mercury content will be assessed providing thus, an estimation of total mercury input during normal operation. Air pollution control technologies, currently installed at facilities, will be listed along will their natural mercury capture rate. It will be assessed in concurrence with the reported mercury emissions in the air, water and soil. Following this analysis, Canadian low-mass mercury emitters and peaking units will be identified. Future hypothetical facilities, defined by Environment Canada, will be presented with expected mercury emissions. 2.1 Canadian electricity generation fleet Electricity is generated in Canada using five technological approaches: hydroelectricity, conventional steam power, nuclear steam power, internal combustion systems and forthcoming renewable energy like wind and tidal power. Electric production units have generated 623 TWh of electricity in 2007 (Tab. 2-1) corresponding to a 9% increase from 1998 total production.1 Public and private EGUs were responsible for 93.3% of total production. Hydroelectricity and conventional steam power covers 80% of total electricity production originating mostly from Quebec and Ontario. Total production in 2007 represented 57% of nameplate electric generating capacity (124.2 GW) for the entire Canadian fleet. Table 2-1: Canadian total electricity generation (in terawatt-hours, TWhe) in 2007 by province and technological approach2 British Newfound- Province Quebec Ontario Alberta Manitoba Others a TOTAL Colombia land Hydroelectricity 181.1 34.4 2.1 64.3 40.0 33.5 8.6 364.0 Conventional 2.6 34.3 50.2 5.0 1.3 0.5 39.5 133.4 steam Nuclear 4.3 79.8 0 0 0 0 4.1 88.2 Others b 4.0 9.8 15.1 2.6 0.3 0.4 5.0 37.2 TOTAL 192.0 158.3 67.4 71.9 41.6 34.4 57.2 622.8 a Includes, in order of importance, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, PEI and Canadian territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board
    Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended Nova Scotia Power 10-Year System Outlook 2018 Report REVISED Date Revised: July 12, 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 4 2.0 LOAD FORECAST ............................................................................................................. 7 5 3.0 GENERATION RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 10 6 3.1 Existing Generation Resources ................................................................................................... 10 7 3.1.1 Maximum Unit Capacity Rating Adjustments .................................................................... 12 8 3.2 Changes in Capacity.................................................................................................................... 12 9 3.2.1 Burnside Combustion Turbine Unit #4 ............................................................................... 13 10 3.2.2 Mersey Hydro ..................................................................................................................... 13 11 3.2.3 Firm Capacity of Distributed Generation ............................................................................ 14 12 3.3 Unit Utilization & Investment Strategy ...................................................................................... 14 13 3.3.1 Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 General Rate Application (NSUARB P-892) NSPI Responses to Larkin Information Requests
    2012 General Rate Application (NSUARB P-892) NSPI Responses to Larkin Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-12: 2 3 Please provide a copy of all Journal Entries made on NSPI’s books as a result of the 4 conversion to US GAAP. 5 6 Response IR-12: 7 8 Please refer to Note 16 in Attachment 1, beginning at page 26 of 45. Date Filed: July 18, 2011 NSPI (Larkin) IR-12 Page 1 of 1 2012 GRA Larkin IR-12 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 45 NOVA SCOTIA POWER INC. Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements March 31, 2011 and 2010 13 2012 GRA Larkin IR-12 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 45 Nova Scotia Power Inc. Statements of Income (Unaudited) Three months ended For the March 31 2011 2010 (as adjusted – millions of Canadian dollars note 16) Operating revenues $371.2 $342.8 Operating expenses Fuel for generation and purchased power 168.9 179.6 Fuel for generation and purchased power – affiliates (note 15) 2.1 1.6 Fuel adjustment (note 2) (5.8) (39.4) Operating, maintenance and general 65.5 54.9 Provincial grants and taxes 9.6 10.0 Depreciation and amortization 42.6 41.1 Total operating expenses 282.9 247.8 Income from operations 88.3 95.0 Other expenses, net (note 3) 2.2 3.6 Interest expense, net (note 4) 26.9 26.1 Income before provision for income taxes 59.2 65.3 Income tax recovery (note 5) (6.4) (1.9) Net income of Nova Scotia Power Inc. 65.6 67.2 Dividends on preferred stock 2.0 2.0 Net income attributable to common shareholders $63.6 $65.2 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
    [Show full text]