DOCSLIB.ORG

Arcnes Aug 20 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arcnes Aug 20 2013 A Spinoffs Study Applied to the Airline Industry by Erika Kutscher B.Sc., Engineering Sciences Universidad Cat6lica de Chile, 2006 Industrial Engineer with a diploma in Electrical Engineering Universidad Cat6lica de Chile, 2007 SUBMITTED TO THE SYSTEM DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Engineering and Management ARCNES at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITTE Massachusetts Institute of Technology OF TECHNOLOGY July 2012 AUG 20 2013 LIBRARIES ©2012 Erika Kutscher. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. / I A uth o r's sig nature ............................................................................... :............................................ Erika Kutscher System Design and Management Program C ertifie d by .................................................................................. Re Richard de Neufville Professor, neering Systems Division, MIT Thesis Syervisor A ccep ted b y ....................................................................................... .... .... ..V . OF Senior Lecturer, Engineering Systems Division Director, System Design and Management Program I (Page intentionally left blank) 2 A Spinoffs Study Applied to the Airline Industry by Erika Kutscher Submitted to the System Design and Management Program on July 24, 2012 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management Abstract Airlines have been recently debated the management of some of their non-core divisions, such as the Frequent Flyer Program (FFP).A spinoff is a form of corporate contraction that many companies have recently chosen. Through a spinoff, both the parent company and the divested subsidiary can each focus on their own activity, which translates into a better performance of both entities. This thesis studies the circumstances in which a spinoff is a good strategy to pursue, along with some important issues that must be considered when reaching agreements. Spinoffs are basically a "downsizing" of the parent firm; therefore, the smaller firm must be economically more viable by itself than as a part of its parent company. The motivation for analyzing this particular topic comes from a question of current interest: Under what circumstances is it advantageous for an airline to spin off its Frequent Flyer Program, or other divisions that are not related with the airline's operation? In this thesis, an extensive literature review introduces the reader to the different forms of corporate contraction and their performance under different circumstances. Three cases related to the airline industry follow: the spinoffs of TripAdvisor from the web agency Expedia, of Air Canada's FFP Aeroplan, and of American Airline's distribution system Sabre. These three cases illustrate some of the key issues that must be carefully considered when spinning off a subsidiary. The thesis concludes that spinoffs are a smart strategy when the focus of the spun off division is different from that of the parent company. However, to safeguard future business relationships, the two entities must negotiate detailed agreements that are robust enough to perform successfully in all foreseeable circumstances. Thesis Supervisor: Richard de Neufville Title: Professor, Engineering Systems Division, MIT 3 Acknowledgments I would like start by thanking Professor Richard de Neufville, my supervisor, for his vital guidance and mentorship throughout my thesis. His experience and knowledge were the key factor for bringing together all my research and analysis in a successful manner. Next I would like to thanks the System Design and Management (SDM) Program Director, Pat Hale, for always being available to give me guidance. I would also like to thanks all of the SDM program staff for their great work on running such an outstanding program. I specially want to thanks Chris Bates, Bill Foley, Amal Elalam and Melissa Parrillo. I am very grateful for the patient help of MIT's writing and communication center and of my cousin Lynda. Thanks to them I was able to write this thesis properly and also learned a new skill that I know will be of great use. I am also grateful for the guidance provided by my former employers. They gave my motivation to develop this topic and provided very interesting ideas. Last, but not least, I would like to thank my husband Matias for his love and support through this amazing journey. 4 Table of Contents A b stract..................................................................................................3 A cknow ledgm ents......................................................................................4 T able of C ontents.......................................................................................5 L ist of Figures..........................................................................................6 L ist of T ables...........................................................................................6 L ist of A bbreviations..................................................................................6 Chapter 1: Introduction........................................................................7 1.1 M otivatio n ..................................................................................... 7 1.2 G oal of the T hesis.............................................................................8 1.3 Structure of the Thesis...................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Literature Review...................................................................10 2.1 The different forms of Corporate Contraction........................................... 10 2.2 H istorical T rends..............................................................................15 2.3 R esults........................................................................................ 18 2.4 Sources of V alue.............................................................................. 23 2.5 C oncerns...................................................................................... 26 Chapter 3: Case Studies........................................................................29 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................. 29 3.2 Expedia spins off TripAdvisor............................................................. 31 3.3 Air Canada spins off its Frequent Flyer Program, Aeroplan........................... 37 3.4 American Airlines spins off its Distribution System, Sabre........................... 52 Chapter 4: Conclusions............................................................................66 Appendix: Bibliography........................................................................70 5 List of Figures Figure 1: US Mergers and Acquisitions v/s Divestitures.......................................16 Figure 2: World Airline Net Profit 1989-2010.................................................... 29 Figure 3: Expedia and TripAdvisor web pages.................................................32 Figure 4: Stock price of Expedia, TripAdvisor and the sum after spinoff..................... 35 Figure 5: Accumulation and Redemption functional diagram................................. 43 Figure 6: Stakeholders interactions Architecture diagram.................................... 47 Figure 7: Stock price of ACE, Air Canada and Aimia v/s S&P500 index................... 50 Figure 8: Systems Architecture Diagram.........................................................59 Figure 9: Stock price of American Airlines and Sabre v/s S&P500 index.................... 62 List of Tables Table 1: classification of the four types of corporate contraction............................... 14 Table 2: Mayor Mergers and Acquisitions of the 21st century............................... 17 Table 3: Mean returns of common stock for spinoffs and parent firms.........................20 Table 4: Returns of focus and non-focus increasing spinoffs after different time periods.... 22 List of Abbreviations M&A: Mergers and Acquisitions IPO: Initial Public Offering LBO: Leveraged Buy-Out FFP: Frequent Flyer Program GDS: Global System Distribution IATA: International Air Transport Association 6 Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Motivation Managing the airline industry poses many challenges; intense competition, large fixed costs and strong suppliers of goods and services complicate the situation. This hostile environment forces airlines to push the boundaries and come up with creative ideas to improve the business. Corporate restructuring is commonly used in this sector; Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) have been used extensively to generate synergies in costs and networks. M&A are front- page events in newspapers worldwide, and a large number of academic studies cover this topic. Corporate contractions such as spinoffs occur far less frequently and receive much less attention despite the fact that they unlock significantly more value for the shareholders than M&A do. In the airline industry, spinning off a Frequent Flyer Program (FFP), for example, can be very controversial. FPPs improve the profitability of the industry in two very important ways: first, they generate a massive amount of information that boosts the capacity of the airline to forecast passenger demand; and second,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter Download
    www.igi-global.com/ondemand ® InfoSci-ONDemand Chapter Download ® Purchase individual research articles, book chapters, and InfoSci-ONDemand teaching cases from IGI Global’s entire selection. Download Premium Research Papers www.igi-global.com/ondemand This publication is protected by copyright law of the United States of America codifi ed in Title 17 of the U.S. Code, which is party to both the Universal Copyright Convention and the Berne Copyright Convention. The entire content is copyrighted by IGI Global. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, posted online, stored, translated or distributed in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. IGI PUBLISHING ITB14169 701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Suite 200, Hershey PA 17033-1240, USA Tel: 717/533-8845; Fax 717/533-8661; URL-http://www.igi-pub.com 6 MertenThis paper appears in the publication, Information and Communication Technologies in Support of the Tourism Industry edited by W. Pease, M. Rowe and M. Cooper © 2007, IGI Global Chapter.IV The.Transformation.of.the. Distribution.Process.in.the. Airline.Industry.Empowered. by.Information.and. Communication.Technology Patrick S. Merten, International Institute of Management in Technology, Switzerland Abstract This chapter reviews the historical evolution of the airline market and its first-gen- eration airline reservation and distribution systems. The development and diffusion of computer reservation systems (CRS) and global distribution systems (GDS) is discussed extensively in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of business in the 2000s. Based on this evaluation, the influence of modern information and communication technology (ICT) on the airline distribution system environ- ment is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • AMR Corporation
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commission file number 1-8400. AMR Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 75-1825172 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) of incorporation or organization) 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. Fort Worth, Texas 76155 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (817) 963-1234 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered Common stock, $1 par value per share New York Stock Exchange 9.00% Debentures due 2016 New York Stock Exchange 7.875% Public Income Notes due 2039 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No o. Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, December 9, 2013
    Corporate Communications 817-967-1577 [email protected] FOR RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013 AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP ANNOUNCES EQUITY DISTRIBUTION UPDATE FORT WORTH, Texas – Today’s consummation of the merger between AMR Corporation and US Airways Group, Inc. and the effectiveness of AMR’s Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) will result in the distribution of American Airlines Group Inc. common stock (NASDAQ: AAL) and convertible preferred stock (NASDAQ: AALCP) to equity holders, creditors and employees of AMR Corporation. American Airlines Group Inc. has determined that holders of AMR common stock (formerly traded under the symbol: “AAMRQ”) will receive, for each share of AMR common stock, an initial distribution of approximately 0.0665 shares of AAL in connection with the occurrence of the effective date of the Plan. AAMRQ holders may in the future receive additional distributions based on the trading price of AAL common stock during the 120 day period after the effective date and the total amount of allowed claims, in each case, in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Additional Information and Where to Find It For questions about distributions under the Plan, please visit www.amrcaseinfo.com. For information about American Airlines Group Inc., including financial information, corporate governance and its SEC filings, please visit www.aa.com/investorrelations. About American Airlines Group American Airlines Group (NASDAQ: AAL) is the holding company for American Airlines and US Airways. Together with American Eagle and US Airways Express, the airlines operate an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to 339 destinations in 54 countries from hubs in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix and Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • US and Plaintiff States V. US Airways Group, Inc. and AMR Corporation
    Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:13-cv-01236 (CKK) US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and AMR CORPORATION Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs United States of America ("United States") and the States of Arizona, Florida, Tennessee and Michigan, the Commonwealths of Pennsylvania and Virginia, and the District of Columbia ("Plaintiff States") filed their Complaint against Defendants US Airways Group, Inc. ("US Airways") and AMR Corporation ("American") on August 13, 2013, as amended on September 5, 2013; AND WHEREAS, the United States and the Plaintiff States and Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and without this Final Judgment constituting any evidence against or admission by any party regarding any issue of fact or law; AND WHEREAS, Defendants agree to be bound by the provisions of the Final Judgment pending its approval by the Court; 1 Case 1:13-cv-01236-CKK Document 170 Filed 04/25/14 Page 2 of 28 AND WHEREAS, the essence of this Final Judgment is the prompt and certain divestiture of certain rights or assets by the Defendants to assure that competition is not substantially lessened; AND WHEREAS, the Final Judgment requires Defendants to make certain divestitures for the purposes of remedying the loss of competition alleged in the Complaint; AND WHEREAS, Defendants have represented to the United States and the Plaintiff States that the divestitures required below can and will be made, and that the Defendants will later raise no claim of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the provisions below; NOW THEREFORE, before any testimony is taken, without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law, and upon consent of the parties, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Terrorists: the EU-Canada Agreement in PNR Matters
    Tracing Terrorists: The EU-Canada Agreement in PNR Matters CEPS Special Report/September 2008 Revised version 17.11.2008 Peter Hobbing Abstract Enhancing border security in support of the global ‘war against terrorism’ is very much in vogue these days, in particular as regards the control of air passengers. Seven years after 9/11, this trend is yet unbroken. While the build-up of defences occurs in most cases at the one-sided expense of civil liberties, the EU-Canada Agreement of 2005 is different: quite justly, it holds the reputation of a well-balanced instrument respecting the interests of citizens. Still, instead of serving as a model for future instruments, the Agreement rather runs the risk of being scrapped at the next possible occasion. A close look at the passenger name record (PNR) ‘mainstream’, as embodied by the EU-US branch of transatlantic relations with four Agreements rapidly succeeding between 2004 and 2008, reveals the opposite tendency away from data protection and towards an unconditional tightening of controls. This report undertakes to examine the doubtful benefits of such an approach by assessing the price to pay inter alia for ‘false positive’ mismatches and other collateral damages, while the actual achievement of a higher degree of public security remains very much in the dark, mostly owing to the impossibility of making all borders 100% secure. As a result, no critical reason emerges for taking leave of the good practices established by the EU-Canada instrument. This work was prepared as part of the EU–Canada project – The Changing Landscape of Justice and Home Affairs Cooperation in the European Union and EU–Canada Relations – funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General for External Relations, Relations with the US and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of Shareholders and Management Proxy Circular
    NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR WHAT'S INSIDE NOTICE OF 2008 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING.......................................................................................2 MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR.......................................................................................................................3 VOTING YOUR SHARES ...........................................................................................................................................4 BUSINESS OF THE MEETING.................................................................................................................................10 THE NOMINATED DIRECTORS .............................................................................................................................12 STATEMENT OF GOVERNANCE PRACTICES.....................................................................................................21 COMMITTEES ...........................................................................................................................................................27 COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS...................................................................................31 REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BY THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE .............................................................................................................................................................37 PERFORMANCE GRAPHS.......................................................................................................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • Historia De La Aviación Comercial Desde 1909 Hasta Nuestros Días
    FACULTAT DE FILOSOFIA I LETRES, DEPARTAMENT DE CIÈNCIES HISTÒRIQUES I TEORIA DE LES ARTS HISTORIA DE LA AVIACIÓN COMERCIAL DESDE 1909 HASTA NUESTROS DÍAS TESIS DOCTORAL PRESENTADA POR EL DR. MARTÍN BINTANED ARA DIRIGIDA POR EL DR. SEBASTIÁ SERRA BUSQUETS CATEDRÀTIC D'HISTÒRIA CONTEMPORÀNIA PARA OPTAR AL TÍTULO DE DOCTOR EN HISTORIA CURSO ACADÉMICO 2013/2014 Martín Bintaned Ara 2 Historia de la aviación comercial Resumen Esta tesis doctoral investiga acerca de la aportación de la aviación comercial a la historia contemporánea, en particular por su impacto en las relaciones exteriores de los países, su papel facilitador en la actividad económica internacional y por su contribución al desarrollo del turismo de masas. La base de trabajo ha sido el análisis de la prensa especializada, a partir de la cual se han identificado los casos innovadores. Gracias al análisis de su origen (tecnológico, geo- político, aero-político, corporativo, de producto y en la infraestructura) y a su contextualización, hemos podido trazar la historia de la aviación comercial desde su origen en 1919 hasta nuestros días. Palabras clave: Historia contemporánea, Aviación comercial, Política aérea, Relaciones internacionales, Turismo, Innovación, Aerolíneas, Aeropuertos Abstract This doctoral thesis analyses the contribution of commercial aviation to the contemporary history, particularly in the field of external relations, international economy and mass tourism. We have identified all innovations with a structural impact on the industry through specialised press, considering the changes on technology, geopolitics, aeropolitics, business models, product and services, and infrastructure. This methodology has allowed us to write the history of the commercial aviation since its origin in 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTRÉAL, June 22, 2007 ACE AVIATION HOLDINGS INC
    MONTRÉAL, June 22, 2007 ACE AVIATION HOLDINGS INC. PARTNERS WITH SAGEVIEW CAPITAL AND KKR ON ACTS Unless noted otherwise, all figures referred to in this press release are in Canadian dollars. ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. (ACE) announced today that it has agreed to sell a 70% interest in its wholly owned maintenance, repair and overhaul subsidiary ACTS LP (ACTS) to a consortium consisting of Sageview Capital LLC, a private investment firm, and KKR Private Equity Investors, L.P. (Euronext Amsterdam: KPE), the publicly traded fund of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“KKR”). ACE will retain a 30% equity interest in ACTS and Air Canada will remain its largest customer. The transaction implies an enterprise value of approximately $975 million for 100% of ACTS on a cash and debt free basis. “This transaction is an important step in ACE’s strategy of unlocking the value in all of our businesses,” said Robert Milton, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACE. “ACE’s retained 30% ownership of ACTS in partnership with Sageview and KKR is in line with our strategy of generating additional value for our shareholders by furthering the development of ACTS as a stand-alone, profitable entity. Among their many successes, KKR and Sageview have a track record of helping businesses that were once part of large conglomerates to become bigger, stronger and more competitive as independent organizations. Prime examples include Shoppers Drug Mart, Yellow Pages Group, and ITC, the former transmission business of Detroit Edison. They bring a long-term approach to creating lasting value, and together with them we believe great things will happen with ACTS.” “This investment brings us closer to our goal of establishing ACTS as the leading independent aircraft maintenance provider in the Americas,” said Chahram Bolouri, President and Chief Executive Officer of ACTS.
    [Show full text]
  • 692-5000 in the Matter of the Application of the 31 NMB No. 110
    NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD WASHINGTON, DC 20572 (202) 692-5000 In the Matter of the Application of the 31 NMB No. 110 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD FILE NO. CR-6842 OF TEAMSTERS FINDINGS UPON alleging a representation dispute INVESTIGATION pursuant to Section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act, as September 16, 2004 amended involving employees of ALLEGHENY AIRLINES, INC. AND PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. This determination addresses the applications filed by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (IBT) and the Communications Workers of America (CWA). IBT requests the National Mediation Board (Board or NMB) to investigate whether Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (Allegheny) and Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (Piedmont or collectively with Allegheny as Carriers) operate as a single transportation system. The investigation establishes that Allegheny and Piedmont operate as a single transportation system for purposes of the craft or class of Fleet and Passenger Service Employees. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 13, 2004, IBT filed an application alleging a representation dispute involving the consolidated Fleet and Passenger Service Employees craft or class formed by the -528- 31 NMB No. 110 merger of Allegheny into Piedmont. IBT asserted that Allegheny and Piedmont constitute a single transportation system. The application was assigned NMB File No. CR-6842. The Board assigned Maria-Kate Dowling to investigate. On March 2, 2004, the Board requested that the Carriers provide information on whether Allegheny and Piedmont were operating as a single transportation system. The Carriers jointly responded on March 23, 2004. On March 26, 2004, CWA filed an application alleging a representation dispute involving the combined Allegheny/Piedmont Fleet and Passenger Service Employees craft or class.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport
    The History of Air Transport KOSTAS IATROU Dedicated to my wife Evgenia and my sons George and Yianni Copyright © 2020: Kostas Iatrou First Edition: July 2020 Published by: Hermes – Air Transport Organisation Graphic Design – Layout: Sophia Darviris Material (either in whole or in part) from this publication may not be published, photocopied, rewritten, transferred through any electronical or other means, without prior permission by the publisher. Preface ommercial aviation recently celebrated its first centennial. Over the more than 100 years since the first Ctake off, aviation has witnessed challenges and changes that have made it a critical component of mod- ern societies. Most importantly, air transport brings humans closer together, promoting peace and harmo- ny through connectivity and social exchange. A key role for Hermes Air Transport Organisation is to contribute to the development, progress and promo- tion of air transport at the global level. This would not be possible without knowing the history and evolu- tion of the industry. Once a luxury service, affordable to only a few, aviation has evolved to become accessible to billions of peo- ple. But how did this evolution occur? This book provides an updated timeline of the key moments of air transport. It is based on the first aviation history book Hermes published in 2014 in partnership with ICAO, ACI, CANSO & IATA. I would like to express my appreciation to Professor Martin Dresner, Chair of the Hermes Report Committee, for his important role in editing the contents of the book. I would also like to thank Hermes members and partners who have helped to make Hermes a key organisa- tion in the air transport field.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Information Form
    2012 Annual Information Form March 22, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXPLANATORY NOTES ............................................................................................................................................................. - 2 - CORPORATE STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................................................... - 3 - INTERCORPORATE RELATIONSHIP ....................................................................................................................................... - 4 - REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................................... - 5 - TRADEMARKS ............................................................................................................................................................................. - 11 - INDUSTRY OVERVIEW AND COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... - 12 - THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................................................................................................... - 17 - RISK FACTORS ........................................................................................................................................................................... - 41 - MARKET FOR SECURITIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aa Itinerary on Request
    Aa Itinerary On Request How pursy is Ambrosius when trivalve and gnomic Garry retrograde some Congreve? Osmic and enveloped Shepard Teletypesascertains bumpily.some motorways so baldly! Nelsen metricised reproductively while eusporangiate Corrie rotate terminably or Finally able to buy them and uber, they use this shortly after these seats for aa itinerary on request wheelchair assistance at the mailer, i either main on yo ruesaseconfirm th you! AA Refund question Next ticket of making Air Travel Forum. Make it will not match the itinerary that aa itinerary on request for information are? American Airlines Discounts Worldwide - VR Veterans. Notify you entered is not mandatory to on aa request an american refunds are quick pat on. AA Upgrade List locate the Mobile App Travel Codex. This read not a workable itinerary for many reasons. One with my favorite programs to redeem miles for reward flights is American Airlines. In plot of fax receipt, the airline code and the ticket number shall be located at county middle of valid page. The aa recording is intended effect of imputed income. Manage your Booking Ethiopian Airlines. Airport ticket to itinerary by spending, and itraryandreceipt will be the part of scoring an airline code and aa itinerary on request if the house with room at an experience. The exemption will be documented in your existing reservation record. Call the movie at 91-254-3777 or opening to refundsaacom before a flight departs to make changes to your ticket You will business be charged a leaf and are entitled to. American airlines cargo with american did not make changes for international business class into either business class and website to itinerary on aa rules.
    [Show full text]