Registration Document 2013 "WE MAKE IT FLY" Financial Statements Here You Will Find the Financial Statements 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Registration Document 2013 AIRBUS GROUP – REGISTRATION REGISTRATION DOCUMENT – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DOCUMENT 2013 www.airbus-group.com FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2013 European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS N.V. Mendelweg 30 2333 CS Leiden The Netherlands Auriga Building 4, rue du Groupe d’Or - BP 90112 31703 Blagnac cedex - France 2013 9 www.reports.airbus-group.com The complete AIRBUS GROUP Annual Report package 2013 consists of: Annual Review 2013 Registration Document 2013 "WE MAKE IT FLY" Financial Statements www.airbus-group.comwww.airbus-group.com Here you will find the Financial Statements 2013 Please also refer to the accompanying AIRBUS GROUP Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2013 Photographs © Airbus Group – © Airbus S.A.S. 2014 – Photo by Master Films/A. Doumenjou – X. All rights reserved. REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS N.V. (the “Company” and together with its subsidiaries, the “Group”) is a Dutch company, which is listed in France, Germany and Spain. The applicable regulations with respect to public information and protection of investors, as well as the commitments made by the Company to securities and market authorities, are described in this Registration Document (the “Registration Document”). As further described in its press release of 2 January 2014, the Group has been rebranded as Airbus Group as of such date. The Company’s legal name change into Airbus Group N.V. shall be submitted to the Company’s Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “AGM”) scheduled for end of May 2014. The Company’s subsidiaries may change their legal names in line with the Group’s rebranding. In addition to historical information, this Registration Document includes forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are generally identifi ed by the use of forward-looking words, such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “project”, “predict”, “will”, “should”, “may” or other variations of such terms, or by discussion of strategy. These statements relate to the Company’s future prospects, developments and business strategies and are based on analyses or forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These forward-looking statements represent the view of the Company only as of the dates they are made, and the Company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as may be otherwise required by law. The forward- looking statements in this Registration Document involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the Company’s actual future results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those forecasted or suggested herein. These include changes in general economic and business conditions, as well as the factors described under “Risk Factors” below. This Registration Document was prepared in accordance with Annex 1 of EC Regulation 809 / 2004, fi led in English with, and approved by, the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (the “AFM”) on 4 April 2014 in its capacity as competent authority under the Wet op het fi nancieel toezicht (as amended) pursuant to Directive 2003 / 71 / EC. This Registration Document may be used in support of a fi nancial transaction as a document forming part of a prospectus in accordance with Directive 2003 / 71 / EC only if it is supplemented by a securities note and a summary approved by the AFM. 2 — AIRBUS GROUP REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 1 2 3 4 5 Q Back to Contents REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 Risk Factors 1 Information on the Group’s Activities 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 3 General Description of the Company and its Share Capital 4 Corporate Governance 5 Entity Responsible for the Registration Document AIRBUS GROUP REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 — 3 1 2 3 4 5 Q Back to Contents REGISTRATION DOCUMENT AIRBUS 2013 GROUP Risk Factors 7 Management’s Discussion 2 and Analysis of Financial Condition 1. Financial Market Risks 8 and Results of Operations 59 2. Business-Related Risks 12 3. Legal Risks 17 2.1 Operating and Financial Review 60 4. Industrial and Environmental Risks 19 2.1.1 Overview 61 2.1.2 Critical Accounting Considerations, Policies and Estimates 62 2.1.3 Performance Measures 67 2.1.4 Results of Operations 71 Information 2.1.5 Changes in Consolidated Total Equity 1 on the Group’s Activities 21 (Including Non-Controlling Interests) 76 2.1.6 Liquidity and Capital Resources 77 1.1 Presentation of the Group 22 2.1.7 Hedging Activities 84 1.1.1 Overview 22 2.2 Financial Statements 86 1.1.2 Airbus 26 2.3 Statutory Auditors’ Fees 87 1.1.3 Eurocopter (now Airbus Helicopters) 35 2.4 Information Regarding 1.1.4 Astrium 38 the Statutory Auditors 87 1.1.5 Cassidian 44 1.1.6 Other Businesses 46 1.1.7 Investments 47 1.1.8 Insurance 49 1.1.9 Legal and Arbitration Proceedings 50 General Description 3 of the Company and 1.1.10 Research and Technology, Intellectual Property 51 its Share Capital 89 1.1.11 Environmental Protection 53 1.1.12 Employees 56 3.1 General Description of the Company 90 1.1.13 Incorporation by Reference 57 3.1.1 Commercial and Corporate Names, 1.2 Recent Developments 57 Seat and Registered Offi ce 90 3.1.2 Legal Form 90 3.1.3 Governing Laws and Disclosures 90 3.1.4 Date of Incorporation and Duration of the Company 92 3.1.5 Objects of the Company 92 3.1.6 Commercial and Companies Registry 92 3.1.7 Inspection of Corporate Documents 92 3.1.8 Financial Year 93 3.1.9 Allocation and Distribution of Income 93 3.1.10 General Meetings 93 3.1.11 Disclosure of Holdings 95 3.1.12 Mandatory Disposal 96 3.1.13 Mandatory Offers 97 4 — AIRBUS GROUP REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 1 2 3 4 5 Q Back to Contents GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.2 General Description of the Share Capital 98 Corporate 3.2.1 Issued Share Capital 98 4 Governance 117 3.2.2 Authorised Share Capital 98 4.1 Management and Control 118 3.2.3 Modifi cation of Share Capital or Rights Attached to the Shares 99 4.1.1 Corporate Governance Arrangements 118 3.2.4 Securities Granting Access 4.1.2 Corporate Governance Arrangements to the Company’s Share Capital 99 after the EGM on 27 March 2013 121 3.2.5 Changes in the Issued Share Capital 4.1.3 Dutch Corporate Governance Code, since Incorporation of the Company 100 “Comply or Explain” 131 3.3 Shareholdings and Voting Rights 102 4.1.4 Enterprise Risk Management System 132 3.3.1 Shareholding Structure 102 4.1.5 Ethics and Compliance Organisation 136 3.3.2 Relationships with Principal Shareholders 103 4.2 Interests of Directors and Principal Executive Offi cers 138 3.3.3 Form of Shares 106 4.2.1 Remuneration Policy 138 3.3.4 Changes in the Shareholding of the Company since its Incorporation 106 4.2.2 Long-Term Incentives Granted to the Chief Executive Offi cer 146 3.3.5 Persons Exercising Control over the Company 108 4.2.3 Related Party Transactions 146 3.3.6 Simplifi ed Group Structure Chart 108 4.3 Employee Profi t Sharing 3.3.7 Purchase by the Company of its Own Shares 110 and Incentive Plans 146 3.4 Dividends 113 4.3.1 Employee Profi t Sharing and Incentive Agreements 146 3.4.1 Dividends and Cash Distributions Paid 4.3.2 Employee Share Ownership Plans 147 Since the Incorporation of the Company 113 4.3.3 Long-Term Incentive Plans 148 3.4.2 Dividend Policy of the Company 113 3.4.3 Unclaimed Dividends 114 3.4.4 Taxation 114 3.5 Annual Securities Disclosure Report 115 Entity Responsible 5 for the Registration Document 155 5.1 Entity Responsible for the Registration Document 156 5.2 Statement of the Entity Responsible for the Registration Document 156 5.3 Information Policy 157 5.4 Undertakings of the Company regarding Information 157 5.5 Signifi cant Changes 157 AIRBUS GROUP REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 — 5 RISK FACTORS 6 — AIRBUS GROUP REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 1 2 3 4 5 Q Back to Contents Risk Factors 1. Financial Market Risks 8 2. Business-Related Risks 12 3. Legal Risks 17 4. Industrial and Environmental Risks 19 AIRBUS GROUP REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2013 — 7 1 2 3 4 5 Q Back to Contents Risk Factors 1 Financial Market Risks The Company is subject to many risks and uncertainties that may affect its fi nancial performance. The business, results of operation or fi nancial condition of the Company could be materially adversely affected by the risks described below. These are not the only risks the Company faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that it currently considers immaterial may also impair its business and operations. 1. Financial Market Risks Global Economic and Sovereign Debt Concerns As a global company, the Company’s operations and performance normalisation of the monetary policy. The immediate impact depend signifi cantly on market and economic conditions in from the tapering is partly mitigated by an unchanged forward Europe, the US, Asia and the rest of the world. Market disruptions guidance on short-term policy rates. Medium term concerns and signifi cant economic downturns may develop quickly due to, about the increasing budget defi cit and the sustainability of among other things, crises affecting credit or liquidity markets, sovereign debt will likely have to be addressed over the next regional or global recessions, sharp fl uctuations in commodity several years through a combination of tax increases, agreed prices (including oil), currency exchange rates or interest rates, budget cuts or budget sequestration in defence and entitlement inflation or deflation, sovereign debt and bank debt rating spending, combined with an increase in the debt ceiling to fi nance downgrades, restructurings or defaults, or adverse geopolitical further borrowing.
Recommended publications
  • CZ-Space Day Intro
    16.7.2010 ESA TECHNOLOGY → PROGRAMMES AND STRATEGY Czech Space Technology Day - GSTP July 2010 CONTENTS • The European Space Agency -ESA • Space Technology • ESA’s Technology Programmes • Doing business with ESA • ESA’s Long Term Plan 2 1 16.7.2010 → THE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY PURPOSE OF ESA “To provide for and promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European states in space research and technology and their space applications. ” - Article 2 of ESA Convention 4 2 16.7.2010 ESA FACTS AND FIGURES • Over 30 years of experience • 18 Member States • Five establishments, about 2000 staff • 3.7 billion Euro budget (2010) • Over 60 satellites designed, tested and operated in flight • 17 scientific satellites in operation • Five types of launcher developed • Over 190 launches 5 18 MEMBER STATES Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada takes part in some programmes under a Cooperation Agreement. Hungary, Romania, Poland, Slovenia, and Estonia are European Cooperating States. Cyprus and Latvia have signed Cooperation Agreements with ESA. 6 3 16.7.2010 ACTIVITIES ESA is one of the few space agencies in the world to combine responsibility in nearly all areas of space activity. • Space science • Navigation • Human spaceflight • Telecommunications • Exploration • Technology • Earth observation • Operations • Launchers 7 ESA PROGRAMMES All Member States participate (on In addition,
    [Show full text]
  • OSB Representative Participant List by Industry
    OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION
    [Show full text]
  • Home at Airbus
    Journal of Aircraft and Spacecraft Technology Original Research Paper Home at Airbus 1Relly Victoria Virgil Petrescu, 2Raffaella Aversa, 3Bilal Akash, 4Juan M. Corchado, 2Antonio Apicella and 1Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu 1ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest Polytechnic University, Bucharest, (CE), Romania 2Advanced Material Lab, Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Second University of Naples, 81031 Aversa (CE), Italy 3Dean of School of Graduate Studies and Research, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, UAE 4University of Salamanca, Spain Article history Abstract: Airbus Commerci al aircraft, known as Airbus, is a European Received: 16-04-2017 aeronautics manufacturer with headquarters in Blagnac, in the suburbs of Revised: 18-04-2017 Toulouse, France. The company, which is 100% -owned by the industrial Accepted: 04-07-2017 group of the same name, manufactures more than half of the airliners produced in the world and is Boeing's main competitor. Airbus was Corresponding Author: founded as a consortium by European manufacturers in the late 1960s. Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu Airbus Industry became a SAS (simplified joint-stock company) in 2001, a ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest subsidiary of EADS renamed Airbus Group in 2014 and Airbus in 2017. Polytechnic University, Bucharest, (CE) Romania BAE Systems 20% of Airbus between 2001 and 2006. In 2010, 62,751 Email: [email protected] people are employed at 18 Airbus sites in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium (SABCA) and Spain. Even if parts of Airbus aircraft are essentially made in Europe some come from all over the world. But the final assembly lines are in Toulouse (France), Hamburg (Germany), Seville (Spain), Tianjin (China) and Mobile (United States).
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Outside The
    ISSN 1718-7966 June 26, 2017/ VOL. 596 WEEKLY AVIATION HEADLINES Read by thousands of aviation professionals and technical decision-makers every week www.avitrader.com WORLD NEWS Ryanair launches connecting flights in Milan Ryanair, the largest airline in Italy ex- tended its connecting flights service to Milan Bergamo Airport, providing Ryanair customers with an expanded route choice, and the opportunity to book and transfer directly onto con- necting Ryanair flights. This come following the successful launch of connecting flights at Rome Fiumicino last month. In other news Ryanair (Europe) announced the purchase of 10 more Boeing 737 Max 200 “Ga- mechanger” aircraft, 5 of which will deliver in the first half of 2019, with the second 5 delivering in the first half of 2020. Airbus unveiled new innovations Nasmyth Group opens new met- in Paris. al treatment facility in California Pegasus Nasmyth Group announces Photo: Airbus the opening of a new metal surface treatments facility in the Santa Clarita Flying outside the box Valley (SCV) in Valencia, California, sig- OEMs spread their wings at Paris nificantly expanding Nasmyth TMF’s footprint and ability to deliver services This year’s Paris Air Show was rela- unit), would allow an aircraft fitted unit also sends data automatically to aerospace and defence clients in the tively upbeat in terms of orders espe- with it to taxi without using its jet into efficiency applications such as USA. The processing line will be able to cially by the big two Boeing and Air- engines or requiring airport tractors weather, flight planning, logbooks, operate 24 hours a day, seven days a bus but the common theme across or tugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Notice the Depository Trust Company
    Important Notice The Depository Trust Company B #: 12945-20 Date: February 10, 2020 To: All Participants Category: Dividends | International From: Global Tax Services Attention: Managing Partner/Officer, Cashier, Dividend Mgr., Tax Mgr. BNY Mellon | ADRs | Qualified Dividends for Tax Year 2019 Subject: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNYM”), as depositary for these issues listed below has reviewed and determined if they met the criteria for reduced U.S. tax rate as “qualified dividends” for tax year 2019. The Depository Trust Company received the attached correspondence containing Tax Information. If applicable, please consult your tax advisor to ensure proper treatment of these events. Non-Confidential DTCC Public (White) 2019 DIVIDEND CERTIFICATION CUSIP DR Name Country Exchange Qualified 000304105 AAC TECHNOLOGIES HLDGS INC CAYMAN ISLANDS OTC N 000380105 ABCAM PLC UNITED KINGDOM OTC Y 001201102 AGL ENERGY LTD AUSTRALIA OTC Y 001317205 AIA GROUP LTD HONG KONG OTC N 002482107 A2A SPA ITALY OTC Y 003381100 ABERTIS INFRAESTRUCTURAS S A SPAIN OTC Y 003725306 ABOITIZ EQUITY VENTURES INC PHILIPPINES OTC Y 003730108 ABOITIZ PWR CORP PHILIPPINES OTC Y 004563102 ACKERMANS & VAN HAAREN BELGIUM OTC Y 004845202 ACOM CO. JAPAN OTC Y 006754204 ADECCO GROUP AG SWITZERLAND OTC Y 007192107 ADMIRAL GROUP UNITED KINGDOM OTC Y 007627102 AEON CO LTD JAPAN OTC Y 008712200 AIDA ENGR LTD JAPAN OTC Y 009126202 AIR LIQUIDE FRANCE OTC Y 009279100 AIRBUS SE NETHERLANDS OTC Y 009707100 AJINOMOTO INC JAPAN OTC Y 015096209 ALEXANDRIA MINERAL - REG. S EGYPT None N 015393101 ALFA LAVAL AB SWEDEN SWEDEN OTC Y 021090204 ALPS ELEC LTD JAPAN OTC Y 021244207 ALSTOM FRANCE OTC Y 022205108 ALUMINA LTD AUSTRALIA OTC Y 022631204 AMADA HLDGS CO LTD JAPAN OTC Y 023511207 AMER GROUP HOLDING - REG.
    [Show full text]
  • Airbus A320 Family Equipment Catalogue Incl
    AIRBUS A320 EQUIPMENT CATALOGUE EQUIPMENT A320 AIRBUS | HYDRO AIRBUS A320 FAMILY EQUIPMENT CATALOGUE INCL. NEO 5 HYDRO | Airbus A320 Equipment 1 _INDEX 12 2_EQUIPMENT LIST 16 3 _DIMENSIONS & AREAS 23 3.1 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ACCESS STAND 24 3.2 MULTI-PURPOSE PLATFORM 26 4 _LIFTING & SHORING (ATA CHAPTER 07) 29 4.1 FORTEVO TRIPOD-JACKS 30 4.2 SMARTLINE TRIPOD-JACKS 46 4.3 SHORING STANCHION 50 4.4 AXLE-JACK / STANDARD AXLE-JACK (RT) 52 4.5 AXLE-JACK / UNIVERSAL AXLE-JACK (RC) 56 4.6 AXLE-JACK / FLY-AWAY AXLE-JACK (RH) 58 4.7 AXLE-JACK / RECOVERY AXLE-JACK (RL) 60 4.8 RECOVERY AXLE-JACK BEAM 62 4.9 AXLE-JACK HOSE PRESSURE KIT 64 4.10 STEERING TEST EQUIPMENT 65 5 _TOWING AND TAXING (ATA CHAPTER 09) 66 5.1 TOW-BAR (STANDARD) 68 5.2 TOW-BAR (UNIVERSAL) 70 5.3 TOW-BAR (FLY-AWAY) 72 5.4 DEBOGGING KIT 74 6 _SERVICING (ATA CHAPTER 12) 76 6.1 NITROGEN SERVICE CART 78 6.2 OXYGEN SERVICE CART 80 6.3 AIRCRAFT WHEEL AND BRAKE CHANGE TRAILER 82 6.4 FLUID DISPENSER 84 6.5 AIRCRAFT TYRE PRESSURE GAUGES 86 6.6 AIRCRAFT TYRE INFLATION 88 6.7 OIL FILLING UNIT 90 7 _ELECTRONIC BONDING (ATA CHAPTER 20) 92 7 LOOP RESISTANCE TESTER AIRLINER SET 94 8 _EQUIPMENT / FURNISHING (ATA CHAPTER 25) 97 8 CABIN INTERIOR ACCESS STAND 98 9 _HYDRAULIC POWER (ATA CHAPTER 29) 97 9.1 HYDRAULIC POWER 104 9.2 WATER SEPARATOR SYSTEM 108 9.3 SAMPLING VALVE ADAPTER 110 HYDRO | Airbus A320 Equipment 6 9.4 TEST EQUIPMENT FOR RAM-AIR TURBINE 111 9.5 RAT SAFETY INTERFACE KIT 113 9.6 TEST EQUIPMENT FOR RAM-AIR TURBINE 114 01 _LANDING GEAR (ATA CHAPTER 32) 117 10.1 WHEEL AND BRAKE CHANGE
    [Show full text]
  • ACT-RPR-SPS-1110 Sps Europe Paper
    62nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, SA. Copyright ©2011 by the European Space Agency (ESA). Published by the IAF, with permission and released to the IAF to publish in all forms. IAC-11-C3.1.3 PROSPECTS FOR SPACE SOLAR POWER IN EUROPE Leopold Summerer European Space Agency, Advanced Concepts Team, The Netherlands, [email protected] Lionel Jacques European Space Agency, Advanced Concepts Team, The Netherlands, [email protected] In 2002, a phased, multi-year approach to space solar power has been published. Following this plan, several activities have matured the concept and technology further in the following years. Despite substantial advances in key technologies, space solar power remains still at the weak intersections between the space sector and the energy sector. In the 10 years since the development of the European SPS Programme Plan, both, the space and the energy sectors have undergone substantial changes and many key enabling technologies for space solar power have advanced significantly. The present paper attempts to take account of these changes in view to assess how they influence the prospect for space solar power work for Europe. Fresh Look Study as well as the work on a European I INTRODUCTION sail tower concept by Klimke and Seboldt [16], [17]. Based on these results, which re-confirmed the The concept of generating solar power in space and principal technical viability of space solar power transmitting it to Earth to contribute to terrestrial energy concepts, the focus of the first phase of the European systems has received period attention since P. Glaser SPS programme plan has been to enlarge the evaluation published the first engineering approach to it in 1968 scope of space solar power by including expertise from [1].
    [Show full text]
  • → Space for Europe European Space Agency
    number 153 | February 2013 bulletin → space for europe European Space Agency The European Space Agency was formed out of, and took over the rights and The ESA headquarters are in Paris. obligations of, the two earlier European space organisations – the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO) and the European Launcher Development The major establishments of ESA are: Organisation (ELDO). The Member States are Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands. Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada is a Cooperating State. ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany. In the words of its Convention: the purpose of the Agency shall be to provide for ESRIN, Frascati, Italy. and to promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in space research and technology and their space applications, with a view ESAC, Madrid, Spain. to their being used for scientific purposes and for operational space applications systems: Chairman of the Council: D. Williams (to Dec 2012) → by elaborating and implementing a long-term European space policy, by recommending space objectives to the Member States, and by concerting the Director General: J.-J. Dordain policies of the Member States with respect to other national and international organisations and institutions; → by elaborating and implementing activities and programmes in the space field; → by coordinating the European space programme and national programmes, and by integrating the latter progressively and as completely as possible into the European space programme, in particular as regards the development of applications satellites; → by elaborating and implementing the industrial policy appropriate to its programme and by recommending a coherent industrial policy to the Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • English BAE Systems and Nally, It Develops Arms Systems for War- the Second World Military Aerospace Ships Through the FABA Programme, Company After Boeing
    THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX A PARASITE ON SPANISH ECONOMY REPORT no. 12 REPORT no. 12 THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX A parasite on Spanish economy Pere Ortega Camino Simarro Centre d’Estudis per la Pau J.M. Delàs · Justícia i Pau Barcelona, April 2012 Centre d’Estudis per la Pau JM Delàs Justícia i Pau · Rivadeneyra 6, 10è 08002 Barcelona T. 93 317 61 77 F. 93 412 53 84 www.centredelas.org [email protected] [email protected] Barcelona, April 2012 Graphic design: Fundació Tam-Tam D.L.: B-19745-2010 ISSN: 2013-8032 REPORT no. 12 The military industrial complex. A parasite on Spanish economy 4 THE MILITARY REPORT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX A PARASITE ON SPANISH ECONOMY no. 12 Index EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION......................7 The military-industrial complex in Spain is based on an oligopoly made up of four big companies that provide all the weapons that the Ministry of Defence 2. MILITARY PRODUCTION IN SPAIN . .8 uses for its armies. EADS-Casa manufactures aeronautics for the air force; Na- vantia produces warships for the navy; Santa Bárbara/General Dynamics sells 3. A SHORT HISTORY OF THE MILITARY heavy and small arms to the army and, last but not least, Indra provides all the INDUSTRY IN SPAIN . 9 aforementioned armed forces and their weapons with most of the electronics and new technologies. 4. SOME SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE SECTOR . .11 These four companies make up between 75 and 80% of the total turnover of military production which amounted to approximately E 6.6 billion in 2009. 5. DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL That represented 1.24% of the national industrial production and 1.1% of the SUBSECTORS .
    [Show full text]
  • CCP Instruments As of 2003 03 27 Engl
    First introduction sequence of CCP instruments as of March 27, 2003 CCP Instruments DAX Block Crossing DAX (Xetra XXL) + corresponding instruments 1 DE0008232125 LHA LUFTHANSA AG VNA O.N. 1 BC0008232125 BCLHA LUFTHANSA AG VNA O.N. 2 DE0007172009 SCH SCHERING AG O.N. 2 BC0007172009 BCSCH SCHERING AG O.N. CCP Instruments MDAX + corresponding instruments Block Crossing MDAX (Xetra XXL) 1 DE0002457561 HEIJ HEIDELBERGCEMENT O.N. NST 2 DE0005072102 BZL BERU AG O.N. 1 BC0005072102 BCBZL BERU AG 3 DE0005085906 AWD AWD HOLDING AG O.N. 2 BC0005085906 BCAWD AWD HOLDING AG O.N. 4 DE0005200000 BEI BEIERSDORF AG O.N. 3 BC0005200000 BCBEI BEIERSDORF AG O.N. 5 DE0005245500 BOS HUGO BOSS AG ST O.N. 6 DE0005245534 BOS3 HUGO BOSS AG VZO O.N. 4 BC0005245534 BBOS3 HUGO BOSS AG VZO O.N. 7 DE0005278006 BUD BUDERUS AG O.N. 5 BC0005278006 BCBUD BUDERUS AG O.N. 8 DE0005408116 ARL AAREAL BANK AG 6 BC0005408116 BCARL AAREAL BANK AG 9 DE0005408884 LEO LEONI AG NA O.N. 7 BC0005408884 BCLEO LEONI AG 10 DE0005421903 DGX DEGUSSA AG O.N. 8 BC0005421903 BCDGX DEGUSSA AG O.N. 11 DE0005439004 CON CONTINENTAL AG O.N. 9 BC0005439004 BCCON CONTINENTAL AG O.N. 12 DE0005471601 TNH TECHEM O.N. 10 BC0005471601 BCTNH TECHEM O.N. 13 DE0005591002 DYK DYCKERHOFF ST O.N. 14 DE0005591036 DYK3 DYCKERHOFF VZO O.N. 11 BC0005591036 BDYK3 DYCKERHOFF VZO O.N. 15 DE0005753008 CZZ CELANESE AG O.N. 12 BC0005753008 BCCZZ CELANESE AG O.N. 16 DE0005773303 FRA FRAPORT AG FFM.AIRPORT 13 BC0005773303 BCFRA FRAPORT AG 17 DE0005785604 FRE FRESENIUS AG O.N.
    [Show full text]
  • J a N U a R Y 2 0 1 1
    FAST47_COUV.qxp:couvFAST41 rectoverso 06/01/11 11:36 Page 2 JANUARY 2011 FLIGHT AIRWORTHINESS SUPPORT 47 TECHNOLOGY FAST AIRBUS TECHNICAL MAGAZINE FAST 47 FAST FAST47_COUV.qxp:couvFAST41 rectoverso 20/12/10 11:15 Page 3 Customer Services events Just happened Material, Logistics, Suppliers & Warranty sym- posium This event was held in October 2010, gathering impact of such services on the aircraft residual 97 customers and 39 suppliers in Paris, France. value. A very productive lessors’ caucus Various presentations, live demos and inter- emphasized our ability to react quickly to active sessions highlighted the latest innovative lessors’ queries and specific requirements. developments and initiatives in the material, Finally, a satis faction questionnaire showed logistics, suppliers and warranty fields. A very that lessors were very satisfied with Airbus’ customer support and by its special active exchange of views took place during the consideration for leasing companies. 12 interactive sessions and caucus discussions on different material management topics. Coming soon Together, the attendees had the opportunity to shape the future requirements and business Airbus Corporate Jet (ACJ) forum models in the material, logistics, suppliers and The next Airbus Corporate Jet forum will be held in Hong Kong, China, from 29 to 31 warranty domains. March 2011. The invitations and programmes A380 symposium will be sent at the beginning of 2011. This symposium took place in Singapore, in November, and featured an airline caucus Performance and Operations conference where the operators were able to provide The 17th Performance and Operations conference detailed feedback on their A380 operational will take place in Dubai, from 9 to 13 May 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Keeping Algorithms for the Satellite Swarm Sensor Network Project
    5th Federated and Fractionated Satellite Systems Workshop November 2-3, 2017, ISAE SUPAERO – Toulouse, France Cluster Keeping Algorithms for the Satellite Swarm Sensor Network Project Eviatar Edlerman and Pini Gurfil Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract This paper develops cluster control algorithms for the Satellite Swarm Sensor Network (S3Net) project, whose main aim is to enable fractionation of space-based remote sensing, imaging, and observation satellites. A methodological development of orbit control algorithms is provided, supporting the various use cases of the mission. Emphasis is given on outlining the algorithms structure, information flow, and software implementation. The methodology presented herein enables operation of multiple satellites in coordination, to enable fractionation of space sensors and augmentation of data provided therefrom. 1. INTRODUCTION In the field of earth observation from space, modern approaches show a trend of moving away from the classical single satellite missions, where one satellite includes a complete set of sensors and instruments, towards fractionated and distributed sensor missions, where multiple satellites, possibly carrying different types of sensors, act in a formation or swarm. Such missions promise an increase of imaging quality, an increase of service quality and, in many cases, a decrease of deployment costs for satellites that can become smaller and less complex due to mission requirements. Need for incremental deployment can be caused by funding limitations or issues. Although a combination of funds from different interest groups is possible, it can be difficult to achieve. A higher degree of independence for service providers can be enabled through lower cost satellites that allow integration into satellite swarms.
    [Show full text]