DOCSLIB.ORG

Giedrius Gasiūnas Mechanism of DNA Interference by Type II CRISPR/Cas Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Giedrius Gasiūnas Mechanism of DNA Interference by Type II CRISPR/Cas Systems VILNIUS UNIVERSITY Giedrius Gasiūnas Mechanism of DNA interference by Type II CRISPR/Cas systems Doctoral dissertation Physical science, biochemistry (04 P) Vilnius, 2012 The work presented in this doctoral dissertation has been carried out at the Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University during 2007-2011. Supervisor Prof. dr. Virginijus Šikšnys (Vilnius University, physical sciences, biochemistry - 04 P) 2 VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS Giedrius Gasiūnas DNR interferencijos mechanizmas II tipo CRISPR/Cas sistemose Daktaro disertacija Fiziniai mokslai, biochemija (04 P) Vilnius, 2012 3 Disertacija rengta 2007-2011 m. Vilniaus universiteto Biotechnologijos institute. Mokslinis vadovas Prof. dr. Virginijus Šikšnys (Vilniaus universitetas, fiziniai mokslai, biochemija - 04 P) 4 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 9 1. LITERATURE OVERVIEW ................................................................ 13 1.1. Bacterial antiviral defense mechanisms ................................... 13 1.2. CRISPR/Cas systems .................................................................. 16 1.3. Diversity and nomenclature of CRISPR/Cas systems and Cas proteins ........................................................................................ 19 1.4. Mechanisms of CRISPR/Cas systems ....................................... 23 1.4.1. Immunization step .................................................................... 23 1.4.2. Immunity step ........................................................................... 24 1.4.2.1. Generation of crRNA ........................................................ 26 1.4.2.2. crRNA guided interference ............................................... 26 1.5. Biochemistry of Cas proteins ..................................................... 27 1.5.1. Proteins involved in spacer acquisition .................................... 29 1.5.1.1. Cas1 protein ...................................................................... 29 1.5.1.2. Cas2 protein ...................................................................... 30 1.5.1.3. Csn2 protein ...................................................................... 31 1.5.2. Cas proteins involved in crRNA maturation ............................ 32 1.5.2.1. Cas6 protein family........................................................... 32 1.5.3. Complexes and Cas proteins involved in foreign nucleic acid recognition and degradation ..................................................... 35 1.5.3.1. Subtype II-E effector complex: Cascade .......................... 35 1.5.3.2. Cas3 .................................................................................. 40 1.5.3.3. Subtype I-F effector complex: Csy complex .................... 41 1.5.3.4. Type I-A effector complex: aCascade .............................. 42 1.5.3.5. The Cmr complexes .......................................................... 44 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................... 49 2.1. Materials ...................................................................................... 49 2.1.1. Chemicals.................................................................................. 49 2.1.2. Enzymes .................................................................................... 49 2.1.3. Kits for molecular biology ........................................................ 49 2.1.4. Bacterial and viral strains ......................................................... 49 2.1.5. Plasmids and DNA ................................................................... 50 2.1.6. Oligonucleotide substrates ........................................................ 50 2.1.7. Buffers ...................................................................................... 50 2.2. Methods........................................................................................ 52 2.2.1. Electrophoresis ......................................................................... 52 2.2.1.1. Non-denaturing electrophoresis through agarose ............. 52 2.2.1.2. Non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ........ 52 5 2.2.1.3. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ............... 53 2.2.1.4. Denaturing (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of proteins ............................................................................. 53 2.2.2. DNA manipulations .................................................................. 54 2.2.2.1. Isolation of DNA and recombinant DNA techniques ....... 54 2.2.2.2. Construction of plasmid substrates ................................... 54 2.2.2.3. Cloning of full CRISPR3/Cas system .............................. 55 2.2.2.4. Frameshift mutations/deletions of cas genes .................... 55 2.2.2.5. Cloning of cas9 gene ........................................................ 57 2.2.2.6. Manipulations with CRISPR region ................................. 58 2.2.2.7. Site-directed mutagenesis ................................................. 60 2.2.3. Preparation of RNA substrates ................................................. 61 2.2.4. Plasmid transformation ............................................................. 61 2.2.5. Phage plaque assay ................................................................... 62 2.2.6. Expression and purification of Cas9 protein and Cas9-crRNA complex ..................................................................................... 62 2.2.7. Northern blot analysis ............................................................... 64 2.2.8. Reactions with oligonucleotide substrates ................................ 64 2.2.9. Reactions with plasmid substrates ............................................ 65 2.2.10. Plasmid cleavage position determination ............................. 65 2.2.11. Binding assay ........................................................................ 65 2.2.12. Sequence analysis ................................................................. 66 2.2.13. Gel filtration .......................................................................... 66 3. RESULTS ................................................................................................ 67 3.1. CRISPR/Cas systems of S. thermophilus .................................. 67 3.2. Characterization CRISPR3/Cas system in E. coli cells ........... 68 3.2.1. Cloning of the CRISPR3/Cas system in E. coli ........................ 68 3.2.2. The CRISPR3/Cas system prevents plasmid transformation in E. coli ........................................................................................ 70 3.2.3. The CRISPR3/Cas system provides resistance against phage lambda in E. coli ....................................................................... 71 3.2.4. Position-dependent tolerance for mismatches in CRISPR-based plasmid interference .................................................................. 72 3.2.5. The PAM sequence is important for plasmid interference ....... 73 3.2.6. Only Cas9 is required for plasmid interference in E. coli ........ 74 3.2.7. Mutational analysis of cas9 ...................................................... 75 3.2.8. The role of Cas proteins in the defense mechanism ................. 79 3.2.9. “Vaccination” of E. coli against plasmids and phages by the heterologous CRISPR3/Cas system .......................................... 80 3.3. The effector complex of Type II systems .................................. 81 3.3.1. Isolation and analysis of the Cas9-crRNA complex ................. 81 3.3.2. The Cas9-crRNA complex cleaves double-stranded DNA within the proto-spacer ........................................................................ 85 3.3.3. Cas9-crRNA cleavage specificity is directed by the crRNA sequence .................................................................................... 88 6 3.3.4. The PAM is required for DNA binding and cleavage by the Cas9-crRNA complex ............................................................... 92 3.3.5. Mutagenesis of RuvC and HNH motifs in Cas9 ....................... 94 3.3.6. The Cas9-crRNA complex guides dsDNA cleavage ................ 98 3.3.7. Mechanism of DNA interference in Type II systems ............... 99 3.3.8. Comparison to other effector complexes ................................ 101 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ......................................................................... 105 CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS .......................................................... 106 FINANCIAL SUPPORT .............................................................................. 107 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................... 108 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 109 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS aa amino acid Abi Abortive infection AHT anhydrotetracycline Ap ampycillin bp base pair BSA bovine serum albumin Cas CRISPR associated Cascade CRISPR-associated complex for antiviral defense Cm chloramphenicol CRISPR clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats ds double-stranded DTT 1,4-dithiothreitol EDTA ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid EM electron microscopy EMSA electrophoretic mobility shift assay kb kilobase pair
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • By Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for Degree of in In
    by Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for degree of in in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO Approved: ______________________________________________________________________________ Chair ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Committee Members ii Acknowledgments Thank you to all who have supported me as I worked towards this moment. Thank you to Dr. Joe Bondy-Denomy for showing me what it takes to be a good, thoughtful scientist. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Seemay Chou and Dr. Geeta Narlikar, who encouraged me to think bigger, and to always aim higher, even when I felt it was impossible. I strive to be the kind of scientist you are all proud of. Graduate school would not have been the same without the friends I made along the way: Thank you to the old guard, Adair Borges and Sen´en Mendoza, for your friendship and support, and to the new generation of graduate students in the group, Erin Huiting and Matt Johnson, for your contagious energy and enthusiasm. To my labmates, thank you for your thoughtful discussions and encouragement. In particular, Caroline Mahendra, for showing me what how to be bold, fearless, and meticulous, and B´alint Cs¨org˝o,for showing me how to be fair and thorough. To my closest friends, Lindsey Backman, Akila Raja, and Nette Ville, thank you for your advice, late night chats, and lighthearted moments that have carried me through this time. None of this would have been possible without the support of my family. To my mom, dad, and brother, thank you for believing in me.
    [Show full text]
  • First Line of Title
    SYNTHETIC BIOMOLECULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS TO REPROGRAM CELLULAR FUNCTIONS AND DYNAMIC RESPONSES by Ka-Hei Siu A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering Winter 2019 © 2019 Ka-Hei Siu All Rights Reserved SYNTHETIC BIOMOLECULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS TO REPROGRAM CELLULAR FUNCTIONS AND DYNAMIC RESPONSES by Ka-Hei Siu Approved: __________________________________________________________ Eric M. Furst, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Chemical Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Levi T. Thompson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Wilfred Chen, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Eleftherios T Papoutsakis, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Maciek R Antoniewicz, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • CRISPR-Cas Arxiv:1712.09865V2 [Q-Bio.PE] 26 Mar 2018
    The physicist's guide to one of biotechnology's hottest new topics: CRISPR-Cas Melia E. Bonomo1;3 and Michael W. Deem1;2;3 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 2Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 3Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Three stages of immunity 4 2.1 Adaptation . 6 2.2 Expression . 7 2.3 Interference . 8 3 Molecular memory cassettes 9 3.1 Timing and origin of acquired spacers . 10 3.2 Experimental studies of spacer diversity . 11 3.3 Modeling spacer diversity in the CRISPR locus . 12 3.4 Effects of spacer acquisition and deletion rates . 14 3.5 Timescale of spacer expression . 17 4 Horizontal gene transfer 17 4.1 Acquisition of CRISPR loci and spacers . 18 arXiv:1712.09865v2 [q-bio.PE] 26 Mar 2018 4.2 CRISPR-Cas restriction of HGT . 19 4.3 Persistent HGT . 20 5 Specificity 21 5.1 Cas specificity and conformational changes . 21 5.2 Identifying CRISPR-Cas PAMs . 24 5.3 Self and non-self discrimination . 25 5.4 Cross-reactivity . 26 5.5 Profiling Cas9 off-target activity . 27 1 6 Evolution and abundance of CRISPR loci 29 6.1 Support for a Lamarckian-type evolution . 29 6.2 Strain divergence . 31 6.3 Selection pressure for survival of the cell . 33 6.4 Impact of effectiveness . 34 7 Cost and regulation of CRISPR Activity 35 7.1 Spacer maintenance considerations . 36 7.2 Turning CRISPR on and off .
    [Show full text]
  • CRISPR Edits MASSADHIUSET[NSTITUTE
    Precise and Expansive Genomic Positioning for CRISPR Edits MASSADHIUSET[NSTITUTE by JUL 2 6 2019 Noah Michael Jakimo L I LIBRARIES 19 B.S., California Institute of Technology (2010) S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015) Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2019 ©Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2019. All rights reserved. Signature redacted A uthor ................................ Program in Medd Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning May 3, 2019 Certified by ... .. ....... Signature redacted Joseph M. Uacobson Associate Professor of Media Arts and Sciences Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ............. Signatureredacted (j)Tod Machover Academic Head, rogram in Media Arts and Sciences 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 MITLibraries http://Iibraries.mit.edu/ask DISCLAIMER NOTICE Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. Thank you. Some pages in the original document contain text that is illegible. t Precise and Expansive Genomic Positioning for CRISPR Edits by Noah Michael Jakimo Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning on May 3, 2019, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences Abstract The recent harnessing of microbial adaptive immune systems, known as CRISPR, has enabled genome-wide engineering across all domains of life. A new generation of gene-editing tools has been fashioned from the natural DNA/RNA-targeting ability of certain CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins and their guide RNA, which work together to recognize and defend against infectious genetic threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Characterization of Microbial Symbiotic Associations by Metaproteomics
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2012 Functional Characterization of Microbial Symbiotic Associations by Metaproteomics Jacque Caprio Young [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Other Genetics and Genomics Commons Recommended Citation Young, Jacque Caprio, "Functional Characterization of Microbial Symbiotic Associations by Metaproteomics. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1595 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jacque Caprio Young entitled "Functional Characterization of Microbial Symbiotic Associations by Metaproteomics." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Life Sciences. Robert L. Hettich, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Steven Wilhelm, Kurt Lamour, Mircea Podar, Loren Hauser Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Functional Characterization of Microbial Symbiotic Associations by Metaproteomics A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jacque Caprio Young December 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Jacque Caprio Young All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Massry Winners Tell Tales of Discovery
    NOVEMBER 6 • 2015 PUBLISHED FOR THE USC HEALTH SCIENCES CAMPUS COMMUNITY VOLUME 21 • NUMBER 202 Keck School welcomes parents, honors scholarship donors Symposium offers insight about med school Luncheon focuses on legacy of excellence By Melissa Masatani by the Parents Association By Melissa Masatani of my former students comes early 100 proud par- in Mayer Auditorium. mid a celebration of up and says, ‘I’m mentoring Nents got a glimpse of “Each of your children Asome of the best and this student, so this is your the daily lives of their sons is an individual to us,” said brightest at the Keck School grandchild.’ Just like we pass and daughters on Oct. 23 Raquel Arias, MD, who holds of Medicine of USC, Cheryl on our scientific knowledge, during an annual sympo- associate dean positions for Mae Craft, PhD, was thinking we need to pass on our pas- sium at the Keck School admissions and educational about her “grandchildren” sions and love for science.” of Medicine of USC. affairs and is an associate — the students of her former Craft was one of more than Family members toured professor of obstetrics and students, her legacy of physi- 150 people who gathered the Health Sciences Cam- gynecology. “Each of your cians and researchers from for the 10th annual Keck pus and heard from school children means something to years in the classroom. Scholarship Luncheon, held leaders, including Henri R. us, and we promise you we “I have a lot of adopted sci- Oct. 28 at the California Club Ford, MD, MFA, vice dean will give them the care we entific children,” said Craft, in Downtown Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Editing Based on CRISPR/CAS Systems: Beginning of a New Era of Genetic Manipulation and Inheritance
    Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation Mini Review Open Access Genome editing based on CRISPR/CAS systems: beginning of a new era of genetic manipulation and inheritance Introduction Volume 7 Issue 1 - 2019 Revolutionary scientific advances as a consequence of Juliano Simões de Toledo phenomenological observations have been systematically analyzed. Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil The CRISPR/CAS system was initially observed in 1987 by Yoshizumi Ishino at Osaka University. During sequencing studies on iap gene Correspondence: Juliano Simões de Toledo, Clinical and Toxicological Department, School of Pharmacy of Federal of E. coli gene, Dr. Ishino found 29 repeats of nucleotide sequences University of Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Antônio Carlos, 6627, with a 32 nucleotide spacing. However, the biological significance Pampulha, Belo Horizonte–MG, Brazil, of these sequences are yet to be deciphered as sequence homologous Email to these have been found in others procaryotes.1 In 1993, Francisco Received: October 31, 2017 | Published: January 04, 2019 Mojica, at the University of Alicante in Spain, reviewed genome- sequence data from an extremophile archaea Haloferax mediterranei and noticed 14 unusual DNA sequences of 30 bases long. Mojica research focused on the repeat sequences and, in 2000, Mojica’s team University published their groundbreaking paper in 2012, revealing performed comparative analysis of prokaryote genomes and observed the CRISPR/Cas9 as a promising biotechnological tool for genome that the repeats were common among multiple archaea species and editing.9 Doudna’s group showed that is possible to program the were called as short regularly spaced repeats (SRSRs).2 endonuclease Cas activity to cut specific sequences on genome and the repairing mechanism could insert healthy gene copies.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippe Horvath - Sciencewatch.Com
    Philippe Horvath - ScienceWatch.com Home About Scientific Press Room Contact Us ● ScienceWatch Home ● Interviews Featured Interviews Author Commentaries Institutional Interviews 2008 : July 2008 - New Hot Papers : Philippe Horvath Journal Interviews Podcasts NEW HOT PAPERS - 2008 ● Analyses July 2008 Featured Analyses Philippe Horvath talks with ScienceWatch.com and answers a few questions about this month's What's Hot In... New Hot Paper in the field of Microbiology. The author has also sent along images of their work. Special Topics Article Title: CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes Authors: Barrangou, R;Fremaux, C;Deveau, H;Richards, M;Boyaval, P; ● Data & Rankings Moineau, S;Romero, DA;Horvath , P Journal: SCIENCE Sci-Bytes Volume: 315 Issue: 5819 Fast Breaking Papers Page: 1709-1712 New Hot Papers Year: MAR 23 2007 Emerging Research Fronts * Danisco France SAS, Boite Postale 10, F-86220 Dange St Romain, France. Fast Moving Fronts * Danisco France SAS, F-86220 Dange St Romain, France. Research Front Maps (addresses have been truncated) Current Classics Top Topics Why do you think your paper is highly cited? Rising Stars Our work provides the first biological evidence showing that CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced New Entrants Short Palindromic Repeats), along with CRISPR-associated (cas) genes, functions as a new antiviral Country Profiles system in prokaryotes. Discovered fortuitously in 1987, and described as a widespread family of prokaryotic DNA repeats in 2002, CRISPRs have gained considerable interest in 2005-2006 when distinct publications hypothesized a role in cellular defense against invading DNA. ● About Science Watch The popularity of CRISPR is undoubtedly linked to its putative mechanism of Figure 1: + details action, which is probably analogous to RNA interference (RNAi).
    [Show full text]
  • Metagenomic Analysis of CRISPR-Mediated Host-Virus Interactions in Microbial Communities
    Metagenomic Analysis of CRISPR-Mediated Host-Virus Interactions in Microbial Communities By Christine Ling Sun A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jillian Banfield, Chair Professor Steven Brenner Professor Jennifer Doudna Professor Steven Lindow Spring 2013 Abstract Metagenomic Analysis of CRISPR-Mediated Host-Virus Interactions in Microbial Communities by Christine Ling Sun Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology University of California, Berkeley Professor Jillian F. Banfield, Chair Viruses of Bacteria (bacteriophages) and Archaea have the ability to significantly alter the structure and function of microbial communities. Thus, it is critical to obtain a greater understanding of the dynamic interaction between microbial hosts and their associated viral populations. The CRISPR-Cas system in Bacteria and Archaea serves as a method to connect viruses to their hosts and provides insight into virus-host interactions. A clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) locus and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins function together in the CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune system. Transcripts of the spacers that separate the repeats in the CRISPR locus confer immunity through sequence identity with targeted viral, plasmid, or other foreign DNA. The CRISPR locus can be interpreted as a historical timeline of virus exposure as spacers are incorporated in a unidirectional manner at the leader end of the CRISPR locus. Metagenomic approaches were employed to simultaneously analyze CRISPR loci in microbial hosts and sequences of their associated viruses to examine: 1) the viral response to CRISPR spacer diversification in a closed model system, 2) the retention of older spacers without co- existing targets through time, 3) the information about population histories revealed from the CRISPR locus, and 4) the factors impacting phage and viral diversity in a model natural system.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Metagenomic Analysis of CRISPR-Mediated Host-Virus Interactions in Microbial Communities Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5n12m3d3 Author Sun, Christine Publication Date 2013 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5n12m3d3#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Metagenomic Analysis of CRISPR-Mediated Host-Virus Interactions in Microbial Communities By Christine Ling Sun A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jillian Banfield, Chair Professor Steven Brenner Professor Jennifer Doudna Professor Steven Lindow Spring 2013 Abstract Metagenomic Analysis of CRISPR-Mediated Host-Virus Interactions in Microbial Communities by Christine Ling Sun Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology University of California, Berkeley Professor Jillian F. Banfield, Chair Viruses of Bacteria (bacteriophages) and Archaea have the ability to significantly alter the structure and function of microbial communities. Thus, it is critical to obtain a greater understanding of the dynamic interaction between microbial hosts and their associated viral populations. The CRISPR-Cas system in Bacteria and Archaea serves as a method to connect viruses to their hosts and provides insight into virus-host interactions. A clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) locus and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins function together in the CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune system. Transcripts of the spacers that separate the repeats in the CRISPR locus confer immunity through sequence identity with targeted viral, plasmid, or other foreign DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • What's All This Stuff About CRISPR??
    What’s all this stuff about CRISPR?? CLUSTERED RANDOMLY INTERSPERSED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS Scientists Find Form of Crispr Gene Editing With New Capabilities Gene Editing Spurs Hope for Transplanting Pig Organs Into A common bacterium contains molecules that target RNA, not DNA. If it can be harnessed for use in humans, the process may Humans lead to new forms of bioengineering. Geneticists have created piglets free of retroviruses, an important step toward creating a new supply of organs for transplant patients. Scientists Can Design ‘Better’ Babies. Should They? Advances in reproductive technology have put genetic choices within reach of prospective parents. But critics warn of ethical peril. 1. SCIENCE Scientists Find Form of Crispr Gene Editing With New Capabilities A common bacterium contains molecules that target RNA, not DNA. If it can be harnessed for use in humans, the process may lead to new forms of bioengineering. As D.I.Y. Gene Editing Gains Popularity, ‘Someone Is Going to Get Hurt’ June 3, 2016 After a virus was created from mail-order DNA, scientists are sounding the alarm about the genetic tinkering carried out in garages and living rooms. U.S. Scientists Can Design ‘Better’ Babies. Should They? Advances in reproductive technology have put genetic choices within reach of prospective parents. But critics warn of ethical peril. June 10 The CRISPR-CAS 9 System First, a primer on DNA What’s the takeaway from this?? Base pairing in DNA is unique: Adenine always bonds to Thymine Guanine always bonds to Cytosine Genes are sequences of DNA. The code in a gene lies in the sequence of base pairs.
    [Show full text]