May 2016 Asbmb Today 1 President’S Message

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May 2016 Asbmb Today 1 President’S Message lively lysosomes CONTENTS NEWS FEATURES PERSPECTIVES 2 18 32 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE LIVELY LYSOSOMES EDUCATION e promise of BEST 4 25 ANNUAL MEETING MEET TIMOTHY KARR 35 Meeting up in San Diego COORDINATES 29 Continental shift 6 AN ARTIST NAMED CRICK NEWS FROM THE HILL 38 Better funding to weather public health crises 18 OUTREACH Lysosomes are Know your audience 7 appreciated to be more than just the MEMBER UPDATE cell’s trash cans. 40 IMAGE COURTESY OF CAREER INSIGHTS 8 DYLAN J. BRITT AND JUAN S. BONIFACINO AT THE Research spotlight IN MEMORIAM NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH 38 10 RETROSPECTIVE 29 Osamu Hayaishi (1920 – 2015) 12 NEWS 12 Large donations fund new immunotherapy institutes 13 Fat mice lead researchers to new feeding control pathway 14 JOURNAL NEWS 14 Leukemia cells teach other cells not to self-destruct 15 Predicting pre-eclampsia 16 e Venus ytrap’s major protease 16 35 MAY 2016 ASBMB TODAY 1 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE THE MEMBER MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Citation corruption By Steven McKnight OFFICERS COUNCIL MEMBERS Steven McKnight Squire J. Booker President Karen G. Fleming Gregory Gatto Jr. Natalie Ahn Rachel Green f I understand things right, jour- ingenious phenotypic assays that President-Elect Susan Marqusee nals get scored for citation impact allowed timing of both pupal eclo- Karen Allen Jared Rutter via a metric that considers only sion and locomotor activity, Konopka Brenda Schulman I Secretary Michael Summers two years subsequent to the publica- and Benzer found mutations that Toni Antalis tion of their papers. Papers that get lengthened, shortened or eliminated Treasurer ASBMB TODAY EDITORIAL cited after this two-year window do the 24-hour circadian clock of ies. ADVISORY BOARD not enhance the impact factor of the Remarkably, all three categories of EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS Charles Brenner Squire Booker Chair journal in which they were published. mutations mapped to the exact same Wei Yang Michael Bradley For journals, this is big business — gene — dubbed by the authors the Co-chairs, 2016 Annual Floyd “Ski” Chilton Meeting Program Cristy Gelling they live and die by citation impact. “Period” gene. Committee Peter J. Kennelly For scientists, this used to be e accompanying gure shows the Peter J. Kennelly Rajini Rao an afterthought. But boy do Bob citation history, according to the Web Chair, Education and Yolanda Sanchez Dylan’s famous words ring true in of Science, of the landmark paper Professional Development Shiladitya Sengupta Committee Carol Shoulders this instance: “e times, they are a entitled “Clock mutants of Drosophila Daniel Raben changin’.” Whether we know it or not, melanogaster.” It was cited once in Chair, Meetings Committee ASBMB TODAY scientists are judged by the company 1971, once in 1972 and only 24 times Angela Hopp Takita Felder Sumter Executive Editor, we keep. If we publish our papers in in the decade after its publication. Chair, Minority Aairs [email protected] Committee journals that have high impact factors, ings sped up in the next decade, Lauren Dockett the benet rubs o in many ways. If during which the paper was cited omas Baldwin Managing Editor, Chair, Outreach Committee [email protected] we publish in journals that have mod- about seven times per year. Over Wes Sundquist Rajendrani Mukhopadhyay est citation impact numbers, we suer. the past two decades, since Michael Chair, Public Aairs Chief Science Correspondent, Advisory Committee [email protected] I see certain aws in the use of Rosbash, Jerey Hall and Michael Blake Hill Valery Masterson numerical scores to rank the value of Young cloned the Period gene (2) and Chair, Publications Designer, a scientist. Some of these aws have it became clear that the Konopka and Committee [email protected] Ciarán Finn been articulated by other critics of Benzer discovery was of watershed F. Peter Guengerich Web Editor, citation impact. Do a simple Google signicance, the paper has been cited Interim editor-in-chief, JBC [email protected] search, and Wikipedia will give you roughly 40 to 50 times per year. Herbert Tabor Allison Frick Co-editor, JBC Media Specialist, plenty of input regarding the pros Few would doubt that the paper [email protected] A. L. Burlingame and cons of citation impact. Despite by Konopka and Benzer describes Editor, MCP Barbara Gordon Executive Director, obvious aws, I do not dispute the one of the most signicant discoveries Edward A. Dennis [email protected] general thesis that there is a correla- ever achieved in the eld of circadian William L. Smith Co-editors, JLR tive relationship between the value of biology. By contrast, citation metrics a paper and the number of times it would have given reward neither to eventually is cited. PNAS nor to the authors. Publication I do choose to critique the two-year of this paper instead would have hurt For information on advertising, contact Pharmaceutical Media Inc. at 212-904-0374 or [email protected]. time window. both the journal and the authors. In Take the case of a paper published the two-year interval subsequent to in the Proceedings of the National publication of this paper, it was cited Academy of Sciences back in 1971 (1). only two times. It is hard to get a www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday e report was authored by Ronald worse score than that! PRINT ISSN 2372-0409 Konopka and Seymour Benzer and e consequences of the insidious Articles published in ASBMB Today reect solely the authors’ views and not the ocial positions of described the results of a forward infection of citation impact, at least in the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular genetic screen in search of genes that its current form, are huge. Both jour- Biology or the institutions with which the authors are aliated. Mentions of products or services are might tell us something about the nals and scientists want papers to have not endorsements. circadian rhythm of fruit ies. Using immediate impact. After the two-year ©2016 ASBMB 2 ASBMB TODAY MAY 2016 greatness? In its present form, this measure of citation impact conspires heavily in favor of what is trendy and fad- dish. Journals will die if they publish Konopka/Benzer-like science. Worse yet, scientists — if scored by these measures — will wither professionally if they fail to follow what is in fashion. It is hard to think of anything worse for our profession than this insidious form of citation corruption. We should desire and create a system The citation history, according to the Web of Science, of the landmark paper “Clock mutants of Drosophila that encourages scientists to take risks melanogaster” and work on new horizons. We should reward and encourage Konopka/ window, forget it — the stu is yester- immediate post-publication window Benzer-like creativity. What a pathetic day’s news. e corruptive inuences but having gained recognition later. mistake of unintended consequences of this awed system are obvious: We e journal that publishes these sorts we have created in allowing science to are forced to work on what is faddish of papers should be rewarded, not be led around by the lunacy of citation or trendy. penalized. Likewise, we all know that corruption. If anything, I think a paper should Konopka and Benzer were sage scien- be revered if blessed with the unusual tists. ey set the trend decades ahead Steven McKnight (steven. feature of having been ignored in the of others. Is this not the testament of [email protected]) is president of the American Society for Biochemistry and REFERENCES Molecular Biology and chairman 1. http://www.pnas.org/content/68/9/2112.full.pdf of the biochemistry department at the University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. 2. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v312/n5996/pdf/312752a0.pdf 2017 Annual Aards Nominations for the 2017 ASBMB awards are now being accepted. Nominate a colleague for a prestigious ASBMB award and recognition at the 2017 annual meeting in Chicago. Deadline: June 1 To learn how to nominate, visit www.asbmb.org/awards. MAY 2016 ASBMB TODAY 3 ANNUAL MEETING Meeting up in San Diego Lila Gierasch, incoming editor-in-chief of the Journal of Biological Chemistry, and Fred Guengerich, the journal’s interim editor-in-chief, talk with a booth visitor. University of Georgia Graduate School Dean Suzanne Barbour advises an attendee during ASBMB career hour. Marketing Director Jennifer Dean holds up a hot sale item in the ASBMB booth. 4 ASBMB TODAY MAY 2016 Plenary lecturer Xiaowei Zhang and opening lecturer A busy poster presenter describes her work Robert G. Roeder From left, plenary lecturer Peter Walter, Federation of American Societies for Experiemental Biology President Parker Antin, FASEB Award lecturer Bonnie Bassler, incom- ing ASBMB President Natalie Ahn and current ASBMB President Steven McKnight Attendees smiling through poster session time Experimental Biology attendees goof off. MAY 2016 ASBMB TODAY 5 NEWS FROM THE HILL Better funding to weather public health crises By Benjamin Corb ate in 2014, at the height of is year, one of those other, less pace with research needs for nearly the Ebola epidemic that took understood diseases is in the spotlight. a decade, and as a result, the NIH L the lives of more than 10,000 e Zika virus, currently wreaking hasn’t had the resources to research a people in western Africa, President havoc in Brazil, is predicted to spread multitude of diseases that are health Barack Obama requested more than to the U.S. mainland within the year. threats to many, such as heart disease, $6 billion in emergency funding. e To date, more than 300 American cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. money was for research that would citizens have contracted the virus, Disease-focused translational research expedite understanding of the virus and globally more than 4,000 birth has moved slowly into the spotlight, and help speed approval of an Ebola defects are blamed on the mosquito- leaving basic discovery research — treatment that could bring the disease borne illness.
Recommended publications
  • Medical Advisory Board September 1, 2006–August 31, 2007
    hoWard hughes medical iNstitute 2007 annual report What’s Next h o W ard hughes medical i 4000 oNes Bridge road chevy chase, marylaNd 20815-6789 www.hhmi.org N stitute 2007 a nn ual report What’s Next Letter from the president 2 The primary purpose and objective of the conversation: wiLLiam r. Lummis 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge within the CREDITS thiNkiNg field of the basic sciences (principally the field of like medical research and education) and the a scieNtist 8 effective application thereof for the benefit of mankind. Page 1 Page 25 Page 43 Page 50 seeiNg Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Südhof: Paul Fetters; Fuchs: Janelia Farm lab: © Photography Neurotoxin (Brunger & Chapman): Page 3 Matthew Septimus; SCNT images: by Brad Feinknopf; First level of Rongsheng Jin and Axel Brunger; iN Bruce Weller Blake Porch and Chris Vargas/HHMI lab building: © Photography by Shadlen: Paul Fetters; Mouse Page 6 Page 26 Brad Feinknopf (Tsai): Li-Huei Tsai; Zoghbi: Agapito NeW Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Arabidopsis: Laboratory of Joanne Page 44 Sanchez/Baylor College 14 Page 8 Chory; Chory: Courtesy of Salk Janelia Farm guest housing: © Jeff Page 51 Ways Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Institute Goldberg/Esto; Dudman: Matthew Szostak: Mark Wilson; Evans: Fred Page 10 Page 27 Septimus; Lee: Oliver Wien; Greaves/PR Newswire, © HHMI; Mello: Erika Larsen; Hannon: Zack Rosenthal: Paul Fetters; Students: Leonardo: Paul Fetters; Riddiford: Steitz: Harold Shapiro; Lefkowitz: capacity Seckler/AP, © HHMI; Lowe: Zack Paul Fetters; Map: Reprinted by Paul Fetters; Truman: Paul Fetters Stewart Waller/PR Newswire, Seckler/AP, © HHMI permission from Macmillan Page 46 © HHMI for Page 12 Publishers, Ltd.: Nature vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Pomona College Magazine Fall/Winter 2020: the New (Ab
    INSIDE:THE NEW COLLEGE MAGAZINE (AB)NORMAL • The Economy • Childcare • City Life • Dating • Education • Movies • Elections Fall-Winter 2020 • Etiquette • Food • Housing •Religion • Sports • Tourism • Transportation • Work & more Nobel Laureate Jennifer Doudna ’85 HOMEPAGE Together in Cyberspace With the College closed for the fall semester and all instruction temporarily online, Pomona faculty have relied on a range of technologies to teach their classes and build community among their students. At top left, Chemistry Professor Jane Liu conducts a Zoom class in Biochemistry from her office in Seaver North. At bottom left, Theatre Professor Giovanni Molina Ortega accompanies students in his Musical Theatre class from a piano in Seaver Theatre. At far right, German Professor Hans Rindesbacher puts a group of beginning German students through their paces from his office in Mason Hall. —Photos by Jeff Hing STRAY THOUGHTS COLLEGE MAGAZINE Pomona Jennifer Doudna ’85 FALL/WINTER 2020 • VOLUME 56, NO. 3 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry The New Abnormal EDITOR/DESIGNER Mark Wood ([email protected]) e’re shaped by the crises of our times—especially those that happen when ASSISTANT EDITOR The Prize Wwe’re young. Looking back on my parents’ lives with the relative wisdom of Robyn Norwood ([email protected]) Jennifer Doudna ’85 shares the 2020 age, I can see the currents that carried them, turning them into the people I knew. Nobel Prize in Chemistry for her work with They were both children of the Great Depression, and the marks of that experi- BOOK EDITOR the CRISPR-Cas9 molecular scissors. Sneha Abraham ([email protected]) ence were stamped into their psyches in ways that seem obvious to me now.
    [Show full text]
  • World's Leading Scientists and Technologists to Gather at the Global
    MEDIA RELEASE WORLD’S LEADING SCIENTISTS AND TECHNOLOGISTS TO GATHER AT THE GLOBAL YOUNG SCIENTISTS SUMMIT 2021 Summit will host 21 eminent scientists including Nobel Laureates, who will engage and share first-hand insights in science and research with over 500 young scientists from 30 countries 6 JANUARY 2021, SINGAPORE – The National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF) will host the ninth edition of the Global Young Scientists Summit (GYSS), which will see the gathering of the world’s foremost scientists and technologists engage and inspire aspiring young scientists. Held virtually from 12 to 15 January 2021, the eminent scientists will also discuss the latest advances in research and how they can be used to develop solutions to address major global challenges. The Summit will be graced by Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of NRF, Mr Heng Swee Keat, who will deliver the opening address. The GYSS is a multi-disciplinary event covering the disciplines of chemistry, physics, biology, mathematics, computer science, and engineering. During the event, luminary scientists and technologists will share details of their discoveries by delivering plenary addresses, participating in panel discussions, and engaging with the young scientists in small group discussions. They will also provide mentorship to over 500 young researchers from more than 30 countries. Star-studded panel speaking on a wide range of subjects and issues This year, the GYSS sees 21 speakers, the highest number since the start of the Summit, of whom 17 are speaking at the Summit for the first time. The list includes Nobel Laureates, Fields Medallists, Millennium Technology Prize and the Turing Award winners.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Our Genes—Genome Projects: How Big? How Fast?
    Mapping Our Genes—Genome Projects: How Big? How Fast? April 1988 NTIS order #PB88-212402 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Mapping Our Genes-The Genmne Projects.’ How Big, How Fast? OTA-BA-373 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, April 1988). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 87-619898 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form can be found in the back of this report) Foreword For the past 2 years, scientific and technical journals in biology and medicine have extensively covered a debate about whether and how to determine the function and order of human genes on human chromosomes and when to determine the sequence of molecular building blocks that comprise DNA in those chromosomes. In 1987, these issues rose to become part of the public agenda. The debate involves science, technol- ogy, and politics. Congress is responsible for ‘(writing the rules” of what various Federal agencies do and for funding their work. This report surveys the points made so far in the debate, focusing on those that most directly influence the policy options facing the U.S. Congress, The House Committee on Energy and Commerce requested that OTA undertake the project. The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Senate Com- mittee on Labor and Human Resources, and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natu- ral Resources also asked OTA to address specific points of concern to them. Congres- sional interest focused on several issues: ● how to assess the rationales for conducting human genome projects, ● how to fund human genome projects (at what level and through which mech- anisms), ● how to coordinate the scientific and technical programs of the several Federal agencies and private interests already supporting various genome projects, and ● how to strike a balance regarding the impact of genome projects on international scientific cooperation and international economic competition in biotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • 9-Deoxy-A9,A12-13,14
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 81, pp. 1317-1321, March 1984 Biochemistry 9-Deoxy-A9,A12-13,14-dihydroprostaglandin D2, a metabolite of prostaglandin D2 formed in human plasma (dehydration product of prostaglandin D2/serum albumin/cell growth inhibition) YOSHIHARU KIKAWA*, SHUH NARUMIYA*, MASANORI FUKUSHIMAt, HIROHISA WAKATSUKAt, AND OSAMU HAYAISHI§ *Department of Medical Chemistry, Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606, Japan; tDepartment of Internal Medicine and Laboratory of Chemotherapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464, Japan; tResearch Institute, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Shimamoto, Mishima, Osaka 618, Japan; and §Osaka Medical College, Daigaku-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569, Japan Contributed by Osamu Hayaishi, November 8, 1983 ABSTRACT Incubation of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) with from Sigma. Dimethylisopropylsilyl (Me2iPrSi) imidazole human plasma yielded a product that has been identified as 9- and methoxyamine hydrochloride were from Tokyo Kasei deoxy-9,10-didehydro-12,13-cdidehydro-13,14-dihydro-PGD2 (Tokyo). Sep-pak silica and Sep-pak C18 cartridges were (9-deoxy-_9,9'2-13,14-dihydro-PGD2). The identification was from Waters Associates. Precoated silica gel plates [G60- based on mass spectrometry, UV spectrometry, mobilities and (F254)] with concentration zones and silica gel 60 for column retention time on TLC and HPLC, and NMR. The conversion chromatography were from Merck. Sephadex LH-20 was a of PGD2 to this product was dependent on the incubation time product of Pharmacia. Solvents used in the extraction of and the amount of plasma added to a reaction mixture and was PGD2 metabolites for identification were distilled before use. abolished by prior boiling.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • By Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for Degree of in In
    by Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for degree of in in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO Approved: ______________________________________________________________________________ Chair ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Committee Members ii Acknowledgments Thank you to all who have supported me as I worked towards this moment. Thank you to Dr. Joe Bondy-Denomy for showing me what it takes to be a good, thoughtful scientist. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Seemay Chou and Dr. Geeta Narlikar, who encouraged me to think bigger, and to always aim higher, even when I felt it was impossible. I strive to be the kind of scientist you are all proud of. Graduate school would not have been the same without the friends I made along the way: Thank you to the old guard, Adair Borges and Sen´en Mendoza, for your friendship and support, and to the new generation of graduate students in the group, Erin Huiting and Matt Johnson, for your contagious energy and enthusiasm. To my labmates, thank you for your thoughtful discussions and encouragement. In particular, Caroline Mahendra, for showing me what how to be bold, fearless, and meticulous, and B´alint Cs¨org˝o,for showing me how to be fair and thorough. To my closest friends, Lindsey Backman, Akila Raja, and Nette Ville, thank you for your advice, late night chats, and lighthearted moments that have carried me through this time. None of this would have been possible without the support of my family. To my mom, dad, and brother, thank you for believing in me.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna
    Press Release Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna to receive the 2016 HFSP Nakasone Award The Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) has announced that the 2016 HFSP Nakasone Award has been awarded to Emmanuelle Charpentier of the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany and Umeå University, Sweden and Jennifer Doudna of the University of California at Berkeley, USA for their seminal work on gene editing by means of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Emmanuelle Charpentier Jennifer Doudna The HFSP Nakasone Award was established to honor scientists who have made key breakthroughs in fields at the forefront of the life sciences. It recognizes the vision of Japan’s former Prime Minister Nakasone in the creation of the Human Frontier Science Program. Charpentier and Doudna will present the HFSP Nakasone Lecture at the 16th annual meeting of HFSP awardees to be held in Singapore, in July 2016. A discovery in the late 1980s revealed that neighboring bacterial DNA segments contain repeating nucleotide sequences which flank short segments. In 2007, it was shown that these repeating sequences, termed CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats), are part of a bacterial defense system against foreign DNA. Through their recent joint study, initiated in 2011, Charpentier and Doudna have shown that the system can be harnessed as a genetic tool to efficiently and specifically edit DNA targeting any sequence in the genome. Emmanuelle Charpentier’s laboratory started to focus on the bacterial CRISPR-Cas9 system by investigating it in the human pathogen Streptococcus pyogenes. Her team described the three components of the system that consist of two RNAs forming a duplex (tracrRNA and crRNA) and the protein Cas9 (formerly named Csn1) and showed the roles of each component in the early steps of activation of the system (duplex RNA co-processing and in vivo phage sequence targeting).
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE August 3, 2020 WINNER of CARL SAGAN PRIZE
    PRESS RELEASE August 3, 2020 WINNER OF CARL SAGAN PRIZE FOR SCIENCE POPULARIZATION ANNOUNCED SAN FRANCISCO — Wonderfest, the 23-year-old Bay Area Beacon of Science, announced today that neuroscientist Dr. Matthew Walker has won the 2020 Carl Sagan Prize for Science Popularization. Wonderfest’s Sagan Prize is presented specifically to recognize and encourage researchers who “have contributed mightily to the public understanding and appreciation of science.” Past Sagan Prize winners include UC Berkeley gene editor Jennifer Doudna, SETI Institute astronomer Jill Tarter, and Stanford Nobel Laureate Paul Berg. The prize includes a $5000 cash award. “Wonderfest was born in 1997, just a few months after the death of researcher and popularizer Carl Sagan,” notes the organization’s founding executive director, Tucker Hiatt. “Wonderfest’s work has been dedicated to Sagan’s memory ever since. Sagan would be proud to know that Matthew Walker, so renowned for his research and his outreach, has received Wonderfest’s Sagan Prize for 2020.” Wonderfest is a nonprofit corporation dedicated to informal science education and popularization, particularly among adults in the San Francisco Bay Area. When pandemic constraints allow, Wonderfest produces in-person science events — and their online videos — in an effort to “enlarge the concept of scientific community.” Wonderfest also produces “Science Envoy” workshops to develop the science communication skills of Bay Area PhD students. Walker is Professor of Neuroscience and Psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. He earned a degree in neuroscience from Nottingham University, UK, and a PhD in neurophysiology from the Medical Research Council, London, UK. He subsequently became a Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School.
    [Show full text]
  • First Line of Title
    SYNTHETIC BIOMOLECULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS TO REPROGRAM CELLULAR FUNCTIONS AND DYNAMIC RESPONSES by Ka-Hei Siu A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering Winter 2019 © 2019 Ka-Hei Siu All Rights Reserved SYNTHETIC BIOMOLECULAR CONTROL SYSTEMS TO REPROGRAM CELLULAR FUNCTIONS AND DYNAMIC RESPONSES by Ka-Hei Siu Approved: __________________________________________________________ Eric M. Furst, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Chemical Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Levi T. Thompson, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Wilfred Chen, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Eleftherios T Papoutsakis, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Maciek R Antoniewicz, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome
    8 Early Skirmishes | N A COMMENTARY introducing the March 7, 1986, issue of Science, I. Renato Dulbecco, a Nobel laureate and president of the Salk Institute, made the startling assertion that progress in the War on Cancer would be speedier if geneticists were to sequence the human genome.1 For most biologists, Dulbecco's Science article was their first encounter with the idea of sequencing the human genome, and it provoked discussions in the laboratories of universities and research centers throughout the world. Dul- becco was not known as a crusader or self-promoter—quite the opposite— and so his proposal attained credence it would have lacked coming from a less esteemed source. Like Sinsheimer, Dulbecco came to the idea from a penchant for thinking big. His first public airing of the idea came at a gala Kennedy Center event, a meeting organized by the Italian embassy in Washington, D.C., on Columbus Day, 1985.2 The meeting included a section on U.S.-Italian cooperation in science, and Dulbecco was invited to give a presentation as one of the most eminent Italian biologists, familiar with science in both the United States and Italy. He was preparing a review paper on the genetic approach to cancer, and he decided that the occasion called for grand ideas. In thinking through the recent past and future directions of cancer research, he decided it could be greatly enriched by a single bold stroke—sequencing the human genome. This Washington meeting marked the beginning of the Italian genome program.3 Dulbecco later made the sequencing
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Daniel Koshland, Jr. Retrospective Oral History Project: Bruce Alberts Interviews conducted by Sally Smith Hughes in 2012 Copyright © 2014 by The Regents of the University of California ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Bruce Alberts on March 21, 2014. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. Excerpts up to 1000 words from this interview may be quoted for publication without seeking permission as long as the use is non-commercial and properly cited.
    [Show full text]