DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Report ELECTORAL REPRESENTATION REVIEW Mount Alexander Shire Council Preliminary Report March 2011 2 Preliminary Report Contents SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 4 BACKGROUND 5 Legislative basis 5 The VEC and Electoral Representation Reviews 5 Profile of Mount Alexander Shire 5 Current electoral structure 6 The Electoral Representation Review process 6 VEC research 7 THE VEC’S APPROACH 8 Number of councillors 8 Electoral structure 8 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 10 Public information 10 Advertising 10 Media release 10 Public information session 10 Information brochure and poster 10 Helpline 10 VEC website 11 Guide for Submissions 11 Preliminary Submissions 11 Analysis of Submissions 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 Number of councillors 13 Electoral structure 15 Current structure 15 Ward boundaries 16 3 Ward names 17 Unsubdivided municipality 17 Recommendation — Option A (Preferred Option) 17 Recommendation — Option B (Alternative Option) 17 NEXT STEPS 18 Where should I send my submission? 18 Public access to submissions 18 Public access to reports 19 APPENDIX ONE: LIST OF PRELIMINARY SUBMITTERS 20 APPENDIX TWO: OPTIONS MAPS 21 Summary of Recommendations The Victorian Electoral Commission (VEC) recommends: Option A (Preferred Option) That the Mount Alexander Shire Council consist of seven councillors, to be elected from one three-councillor ward and four single-councillor wards, with unchanged ward boundaries. Option B (Alternative Option) That the Mount Alexander Shire Council consist of seven councillors, to be elected from an unsubdivided municipality. 4 Preliminary Report Background Legislative basis The Local Government Act 1989 (the Act) requires the VEC to conduct an Electoral Representation Review of each municipality in Victoria at least every 12 years. The Act specifies that the purpose of a representation review is to recommend the number of councillors and the electoral structure that provides ‘fair and equitable representation for the persons who are entitled to vote at a general election of the Council’.1 The Act requires the VEC as part of an Electoral Representation Review to consider: the number of councillors in a municipality; whether a municipality should be unsubdivided or subdivided; if it should be subdivided, whether ward boundaries: o provide for fair and equitable division of the municipality; o ensure equality of representation through the number of voters being represented by each councillor being within 10% of the average number of voters represented by all councillors; and, if it should be subdivided, the number of councillors that should be elected for each ward. The VEC and Electoral Representation Reviews The VEC has conducted Electoral Representation Reviews since 2004 at the request of local councils. In recognition of the VEC’s independence and impartiality, the Act was changed in 2010 to define the VEC as the only agency authorised to undertake the reviews. The VEC draws on its experience in mapping and boundary modelling and also engages 5 consultants with experience in local government to provide advice on specific local representation issues during the review. Profile of Mount Alexander Shire Mount Alexander Shire was formed in 1995 by the amalgamation of the City of Castlemaine, the Shire of Newstead and parts of the Shires of Maldon and Metcalfe. At the 2006 census, the Shire recorded a population of 17,067 people. According to the Department of Planning and Community Development’s Victoria in Future projections, the population of Mount Alexander Shire will grow by 13.56% by 2020. This growth will be fairly even across the Shire. 1 Section 219D of the Local Government Act 1989. Current electoral structure The last Electoral Representation Review for Mount Alexander Shire Council took place in 2004–2005. Following the review, the Minister for Local Government determined that the structure of Mount Alexander Shire Council would be: seven councillors; divided into five wards — Calder Ward, Castlemaine Ward, Coliban Ward, Loddon Ward and Tarrengower Ward; with three councillors from the Castlemaine Ward and one councillor from each of the remaining wards. Previously, the Shire comprised seven single-councillor wards, with the urban area of Castlemaine divided into three wards. The VEC recommended creating a three- councillor Castlemaine Ward to represent that community, while retaining single- councillor wards for the local communities outside Castlemaine. The Electoral Representation Review process To achieve the purpose of the Electoral Representation Review, the VEC proceeds on the basis of three main principles: 1. To ensure the number of voters represented by each councillor is within 10 % of the average number of voters per councillor for that municipality. Populations are continually changing — they grow in some areas and decline in others. Over time these changes can lead to some wards having larger or smaller numbers of voters. As part of the Electoral Representation Review, the VEC needs to correct any imbalances. The VEC also tries to ensure the boundaries it sets will 6 continue to provide equitable representation until the next review by taking account of likely population changes. 2. To take a consistent, State-wide approach to the total number of councillors. The VEC is guided by its comparisons with municipalities of a similar size and category to the council under review. The VEC also considers any special circumstances that warrant the municipality having more or fewer councillors than similar municipalities. 3. To ensure communities of interest are as fairly represented as possible. Each municipality contains a number of communities of interest and, where practicable, the electoral structure should be designed to take these into account. This is important for assisting the elected councillors to be effective representatives of the people in their particular municipality or ward. Preliminary Report The VEC bases its recommendations on: internal research specifically relating to the municipality under review; VEC experience from its work with other municipalities and in similar reviews for State elections; VEC expertise in mapping, demography and local government; and, careful consideration of all input from the public in written and verbal submissions received during the review. Public submissions are an important part of the process, but are not the only consideration during a Review. The VEC’s recommendations are formed through careful consideration of all submissions and analysis of other factors, such as the need to give representation to communities of interest. VEC research In addition to the information provided by submitters, the VEC creates a profile of the municipality based on population trends and demographic indicators. The VEC uses the Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006 census community profiles, the Victoria in Future population projections and voter statistics from the Victorian electoral roll. The VEC also undertakes field work, viewing current and possible boundaries for each of the options to evaluate their effectiveness. 7 The VEC’s approach The Act requires the VEC to consider two matters as part of an Electoral Representation Review: the number of councillors for the municipality; and, the electoral structure of the municipality. The VEC approaches each of these matters in a consistent way. Number of councillors The Act allows for a municipality to have between five and 12 councillors2, but does not specify how to decide the appropriate number. However, in considering the number of councillors for a municipality, the VEC is guided by the Victorian Parliament’s intention for fairness and equity in the local representation of voters under the Act. The VEC considers that there are three major factors that should be considered: the diversity of the population; councillors’ workloads; and the desirability of preventing tied votes. The VEC considers that municipalities with large populations are more likely to be diverse both in the nature of their communities and the issues of representation. Geographic factors, particularly in rural municipalities, can also affect diversity. In addition, councillors’ workloads may be affected by the nature and complexity of services provided by the Council, geographic size and topography, population growth or decline and social diversity including social disadvantage and cultural mix. 8 To reduce the risk of tied votes, the VEC generally recommends an uneven number of councillors. Electoral structure The Act allows for a municipality: to be unsubdivided — with all councillors elected ‘at large’ by all voters; or, to be subdivided into a number of wards. If the municipality is subdivided into wards, there are a further three options available: single-councillor wards; multi-councillor wards; and, a combination of single-councillor and multi-councillor wards. 2 Section 5B(1) of the Local Government Act 1989. Preliminary Report A subdivided municipality must have internal boundaries that provide for a fair and equitable division of the municipality and the wards must ensure equality of representation through the number of voters represented by each councillor being within 10% of the average number of voters per councillor for the municipality. In considering the electoral structure of a municipality, the VEC considers the following matters: communities of interest where people share a range of common concerns, such as a common geographic, economic or cultural link; and, the longevity of the structure, aiming to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Profile Newstead 3462
    Mount Alexander Shire Council Local Community Planning Project Community Profile Newstead 3462 Image by Leigh Kinrade 1 INTRODUCTION Mount Alexander Shire Council has been funded over three years until May 2014, through the State Government’s Department of Planning and Community Development, to undertake the Mount Alexander Shire Local Community Planning Project (LCPP). The project aims to support local community engagement across the Shire to enable communities to articulate their needs and aspirations through the development of local community-based Action Plans. In September 2011, Council announced that Newstead would be one of three townships to participate in the first round of planning. This document has been formulated to provide some background information about Newstead and a starting point for discussion. ABOUT MOUNT ALEXANDER SHIRE The original inhabitants of the Mount Alexander area were the Jaara Jaara Aboriginal people. European settlement dates from the late 1830s, with land used mainly for pastoral purposes, particularly sheep grazing. Population was minimal until the 1850s, spurred by gold mining from 1851, the construction of the railway line, and the establishment of several townships. Rapid growth took place into the late 1800s before declining as gold supplies waned and mines were closed. Relatively stable between the 1950’s and the 1980’s, the population increased from about 12,700 in 1981 to 16,600 in 2006. The 1 preliminary Estimated Resident Population for 2010 is 18,421 . Mount Alexander Shire (MAS, the Shire) forms part of the Loddon Mallee Region (the Region), which encompasses ten municipalities and covers nearly 59,000km 2 in size, or approximately 26 percent of the land area of the State of Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • 20120622 Newstead Database
    Shire of Mount Alexander Heritage Study of the Shire of Newstead STAGE 2 Section 3 Heritage Citations: Volume 4 Sandon to Yapeen Wendy Jacobs, Phil Taylor, Robyn Ballinger, Vicki Johnson & Dr David Rowe May 2004 Revised June 2012 .. Table of Contents Page Section 1: The Report Executive Summary i 1.0 Introduction to the Study 1.1 The Study Team 1 1.2 Sections 1 1.3 Acknowledgments 2 1.4 Consultants Brief 2 1.5 The Study Area 3 1.6 Terminology 5 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Stage 1 6 2.2 Stage 2 6 3.0 Scope of Works & Assessment 3.1 Thematic Environmental History 9 3.2 Heritage Places 11 3.2.1 Individual Heritage Places 12 3.2.2 Rural Areas 12 3.2.3 Archaeological Sites 12 3.2.4 Mining Sites 13 3.3 Heritage Precincts 3.3.1 Precinct Evaluation Criteria 19 3.3.2 Campbells Creek Heritage Precinct 21 3.3.3 Fryerstown Heritage Precinct 32 3.3.4 Guildford Heritage Precinct 43 3.3.5 Newstead Heritage Precinct 53 3.3.6 Vaughan Heritage Precinct 68 4.0 Assessment of Significance 4.1 Basis of Assessment Criteria 78 4.2 The Australia ICOMOS Burra Charter (November 1999) 78 4.3 Assessment Criteria utilised in this Study 80 4.4 Levels of Significance 80 5.0 Heritage Program 5.1 Introduction 81 5.2 Heritage Program Recommendations 81 5.2.1 Statutory Registers 81 5.2.2 Mount Alexander Shire Policy review and implementation 82 5.2.3 Recommended Planning Scheme Amendment Process 84 5.2.4 Additional Planning Issues to be considered by Council 86 5.2.5 Council Heritage Incentives 86 5.2.6 Public Awareness Program 87 6.0 Appendices 6.01 The Project Brief 6.02 The
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Budget Estimates 2010-11 (October 2010)
    Senate Finance and Public Administration Standing Committee ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES HEARINGS PRIME MINISTER AND CABINET PORTFOLIO Department/Agency: Department of Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government Outcome: 1 Topic: RLCIP $550 million Senator: BERNARDI Question reference number: 20c Type of question: Hansard F&PA page 54, Tuesday 19 October 2010 Date set by the committee for the return of answer: 3 December 2010 Ms Foster—Yes. As I think one of the other officers said, in this series of programs there are 5,000 projects. Senator BERNARDI—Yes. But are there hundreds of them that have been renegotiated? Ms Foster—Senator, I would have to take that on notice....... Senator BERNARDI—If you can tell me which ones have been renegotiated, I would be interested in that too. How does the department assess the value or the merit of the infrastructure projects that are put forward to it? Number of pages: 41 Answer: In assessing projects in all RLCIP Programs, the Department considered the nature of the project, the level of community support for the project, Council’s ability to complete the project on time and within budget, and whether the project would be sustainable. Where the Department believed there were risks with the viability of the proponent or project that required further consideration, an Independent Viability Assessment (IVA) was undertaken by a qualified external consultant engaged by the Department. The findings of the IVA are considered in the project analysis. Under the RLCIP-SP $550 million program, 137 projects were originally funded with 12 requiring variation to their Funding Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Study of the Shire of Newstead
    Shire of Mount Alexander Heritage Study of the Shire of Newstead STAGE 2 Section 3 Heritage Citations: Volume 2 Campbelltown to Muckleford South Wendy Jacobs, Phil Taylor, Robyn Ballinger, Vicki Johnson & Dr David Rowe May 2004 Revised June 2012 .. Table of Contents Page Section 1: The Report Executive Summary i 1.0 Introduction to the Study 1.1 The Study Team 1 1.2 Sections 1 1.3 Acknowledgments 2 1.4 Consultants Brief 2 1.5 The Study Area 3 1.6 Terminology 5 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Stage 1 6 2.2 Stage 2 6 3.0 Scope of Works & Assessment 3.1 Thematic Environmental History 9 3.2 Heritage Places 11 3.2.1 Individual Heritage Places 12 3.2.2 Rural Areas 12 3.2.3 Archaeological Sites 12 3.2.4 Mining Sites 13 3.3 Heritage Precincts 3.3.1 Precinct Evaluation Criteria 19 3.3.2 Campbells Creek Heritage Precinct 21 3.3.3 Fryerstown Heritage Precinct 32 3.3.4 Guildford Heritage Precinct 43 3.3.5 Newstead Heritage Precinct 53 3.3.6 Vaughan Heritage Precinct 68 4.0 Assessment of Significance 4.1 Basis of Assessment Criteria 78 4.2 The Australia ICOMOS Burra Charter (November 1999) 78 4.3 Assessment Criteria utilised in this Study 80 4.4 Levels of Significance 80 5.0 Heritage Program 5.1 Introduction 81 5.2 Heritage Program Recommendations 81 5.2.1 Statutory Registers 81 5.2.2 Mount Alexander Shire Policy review and implementation 82 5.2.3 Recommended Planning Scheme Amendment Process 84 5.2.4 Additional Planning Issues to be considered by Council 86 5.2.5 Council Heritage Incentives 86 5.2.6 Public Awareness Program 87 6.0 Appendices 6.01 The Project
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Grants Commission Annual Report 1980
    VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1980 1980 VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1980 Ordered by the Legislative Assembly to be printed By Authority: F. D. Atkinson, Government Printer No. 18 Melbourne VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION MEMBERS D. V. Moye B.Ec., H.D.A. (Hons), Chairman F. S. Bales F.I.M.A., J.P. S. L. Cooper J.P. SECRETARY F. M. Thomas B.Ec. (Hons). VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1980 The Hon. Digby Crozier, M.L.C., Minister for Local Government, 480 Coiiins Street, MELBOURNE. V/C. 3000. As Members appointed under section 3 of the Victoria Grants Commission Act 1976, we have the honour to present the fourth Annual Report of the Victoria Grants Commission, in accordance with section 17 of that Act. D. V. MOYE, Chairman F. S. BALES, Member S. L. COOPER, Member F. M. THOMAS Secretary October, 1980. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 9 CHAPTER I. THE YEAR'S ACTIVITIES ...................................................... 11 Inspections ..................................................................... 11 Annual Return of Information. : . ............................................... 11 Comparisons between Years. ........ 12 Conference of State Grants Commissions ...................................... 13 2. THE BASES OF THE DETERMINATIONS ...................................... 14 As-of-Right Entitlement ....................................................... 14 Equalisation ................................................................... IS Revenue Raising Needs ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government (Validation) Act 1988 No
    Local Government (Validation) Act 1988 No. 71 of 1988 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section 1. Purpose. 2. Commencement. 3. Validation of Orders in Council. 4. Shire of Kyneton. 5. Shire of Colac and Dimboola. 6. Review of internal boundaries. THE SCHEDULE 1177 Victoria No. 71 of 1988 Local Government (Validation) Act 1988 [Assented to 15 December 1988] The Parliament of Victoria enacts as follows: Purpose. 1. The purpose of this Act is to validate certain Orders made under Part II of the Local Government Act 1958 and for certain other purposes. Commencement. 2. This Act comes into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent. Validation of Orders in Council. 3. (1) An Order made by the Governor in Council under Part II of the Local Government Act 1958 in relation to a municipality referred to in column 1 of an item in the Schedule and published in the Government Gazette on the date referred to in column 3 of that item shall be deemed to have taken effect in accordance with that Part on the date referred to in column 4 of that item and thereafter always to have been valid. 1179. s. 4 Local Government (Validation) Act 1988 (2) Any election for councillors of a municipality referred to in an item in the Schedule, and any thing done by or in relation to that municipality or its Council or persons acting as its councillors or otherwise affecting that municipality, on or after the date on which the Order referred to in that item took effect shall be deemed to have been as validly held or done as it would have been if sub-section (1) had been in force on that date.
    [Show full text]
  • The Places We Keep: the Heritage Studies of Victoria and Outcomes for Urban Planners
    The places we keep: the heritage studies of Victoria and outcomes for urban planners Robyn Joy Clinch Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Architecture & Planning) June 2012 Faculty of Architecture, Building & Planning The University of Melbourne Abstract The incentive for this thesis that resulted from an investigation into the history of my heritage house, developed from my professional interest in the planning controls on heritage places. This was further motivated by my desire to reinvent my career as an urban planner and to use my professional experience in management, marketing and information technology. As a result, the aim of this thesis was to investigate the relationship between the development of the heritage studies of Victoria and the outcome of those documents on planning decisions made by urban planners. The methods used included a simulated experience that established a methodology for the thesis. In addition, interviews were conducted with experts in the field that provided a context for understanding the influencing factors of when, where, by whom, with what, why and how the studies were conducted. These interviews also contributed to the understanding of how the historical research had been undertaken and used to establish the significance of places and how this translated into outcomes for urban planners. Case studies in the form of Tribunal determinations have been used to illustrate key outcomes for urban planners. A large amount of information including that relating to the historical background of the studies plus a collection of indicative content from over 400 heritage studies was traversed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Faraday Farrago NEWSLETTER of the FARADAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC
    The Faraday Farrago NEWSLETTER OF THE FARADAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC. ISSUE NO. 18 : April 2013 The Water Race shins from the failed attempts) little paradise, the Sucker was Trazel Elliot Also a challenge to walk hell. Any animal falling into he water race was a major balancing along the narrow that swirling fast water would attraction of childhood be drawn Tin Faraday. Like the to a certain highway, it is a man-made watery pathway through the area grave. It that ties us together. With was the frequent droughts, the scary water race carried water death to be to farms, irrigating crops, carefully orchards and providing avoided at water for stock. all costs. For children growing up Once a in an isolated country area, stray calf the water race was a source fell into of interest and adventure. this trap. Having no playgrounds Dad rallied nearby, no shops, no us all, but parks, the bush became the even with playground of our youth. us kids And the water race a place helping of wonder. with ropes Behind our place it was and the an empty concrete channel old Grey during the winter but school Fergie holidays over summer gave pulling, the many weeks of time for poor calf exploring the bush and the was sadly race; a place to run and climb lost. That and play, and swim. The horrifying slow moving, shallow water, walls, side by side, as far as experience reinforced the terror with the straight sides along we could go. We were always of the Sucker! the race became our sandpit, warned about the terrible We were sure to treat monkey bars and swings.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Grants Commission Annual Report 1984 Victoria
    VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1984 VICTORIA Annual Report of the VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION for the Year ended 31 August 1984 Ordered by the Legislative Assembly to be printed MELBOURNE F D ATKINSON GOVERNMENT PRINTER ......1985 No. 13 VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1984 The Hon. F. N. Wilkes. MP., Minister {or Local Govemmen( 480 Colfins Stree( MELBOURNE VIC 3000. As Members appointed under section 3 of the Victoria Grants Commission Act 1976, we have the honour to present the eighth Annual Report of the Victoria Grants Commission, in accordance with section 17 of that Act D. V. MOYE, Chairman L F. CHEFFERS, Member J. M. WALTON, Member W.A Phillips Secretary November, 1984 VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION MEMBERS D V Moye, B.Ec., H.D.A (Hons), Chairman L. F. Cheffers, L.G.E., M.I.E.Aust, F.I.M.A., M.B.S. The Hon. J. M. Walton SECRETARY W. A. Phillips, B.Bus, B.Sc (Hons), Grad. Dipl. D.P., Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION . vii CHAPTER 1. THE YEAR'S ACTIVITIES I Inspections ................................................. 1 Annual Return of Information ................................ 2 Submissions ................................................ 3 Comparisons between Years .................................. 3 Conference of State Grants Commissions ...................... 5 Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance .......... 5 Federal Government Policies ................................. 6 Computer Facilities .......................................... 6 2. THE BASES OF THE DETERMINATIONS . 7 As-of-Right Entitlement . 8 Equalistion . 8 Revenue Raising Needs . 9 Expenditure Needs and Disabilities . 11 Determining the Individual Allocations . 15 Natural Disasters . 16 Acknowledgements . 16 APPENDICES I Transmittal Memorandum and Determinations . 17 11 Municipalities Inspected . 25 Ill Categories of Municipalities .
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Plan 2015/2016
    Separate Attachment COM 33A Ordinary Meeting of Council 23 June 2015 Annual Plan 2015/2016 The Annual Plan outlines the actions for 2015/2016 that will implement key priorities from the Council Plan 2013-2017. The actions are presented under each of the key priorities as follows: A VIBRANT HEALTHY COMMUNITY We will have a healthy, resilient and involved community. We will develop activities that advance our heritage, sports, culture and the arts. BETTER COMMUNITY FACILITIES We will maintain and renew our facilities to provide better buildings, roads, footpaths, tracks and trails, parks and gardens, for our community. A THRIVING LOCAL ECONOMY We will promote our Shire as a great place to invest, innovate and do business. We will encourage tourism in our Shire by showcasing our heritage, environment and local creative industries. BUILDING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES We will demonstrate leadership in sustainability. We will foster the ongoing development of environmentally responsible, liveable communities across the Shire. 1 FUNDING SOURCE Council Mount Alexander Shire Council CRBI Country Roads and Bridges Initiative DEECD Department of Education and Training DEDJTR Department of Economic Development Jobs Transport and Resources DHHS Department of Health and Human Services DTPLI Department of Transport Planning and Local Infrastructure RDV Regional Development Victoria RGF Regional Growth Fund RTR Roads To Recovery SRV Sport and Recreation Victoria VCFN Victorian Country Football and Netball LEAD OFFICERS (LO) CEO Chief Executive Officer DCS Director Corporate Support DSC Director Sustainable Communities DSD Director Sustainable Development MCW Manager Community Wellbeing MDS Manager Development Services MF Manager Finance MHE Manager Healthy Environments MIS Manager Information Services MI Manager Infrastructure MLC Manager Liveable Communities MLE Manager Local Economy 2 A VIBRANT HEALTHY COMMUNITY We will have a healthy, resilient and involved community.
    [Show full text]
  • Harcourt 3453
    Mount Alexander Shire Council Local Community Planning Project Community Profile Harcourt 3453 1 INTRODUCTION Mount Alexander Shire Council has been funded over three years until May 2014, through the State Government’s Department of Planning and Community Development, to undertake the Mount Alexander Shire Local Community Planning Project (LCPP). The project aims to support local community engagement across the Shire to enable communities to articulate their needs and aspirations through the development of local community-based Action Plans. In September 2011, Council announced that Harcourt would be one of three townships to participate in the first round of planning. This document has been formulated to provide some background information about Harcourt and a starting point for discussion. ABOUT MOUNT ALEXANDER SHIRE The original inhabitants of the Mount Alexander area were the Jaara Jaara Aboriginal people. European settlement dates from the late 1830s, with land used mainly for pastoral purposes, particularly sheep grazing. Population was minimal until the 1850s, spurred by gold mining from 1851, the construction of the railway line, and the establishment of several townships. Rapid growth took place into the late 1800s before declining as gold supplies waned and mines were closed. Relatively stable between the 1950’s and the 1980’s, the population increased from about 12,700 in 1981 to 16,600 in 2006. The preliminary Estimated Resident Population for 2010 is 18,421 1. Mount Alexander Shire (MAS, the Shire) forms part of the Loddon Mallee Region (the Region), which encompasses ten municipalities and covers nearly 59,000km2 in size, or approximately 26 percent of the land area of the State of Victoria.
    [Show full text]