Introduction Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda Have Had A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Introduction Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda Have Had A

EAC Introduction Member Countries Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda have had a history of Burundi South Sudan cooperation that dates back to the early 20th century. The Kenya Tanzania Customs Union between Kenya and Uganda was formed in Rwanda Uganda 1917, and Tanzania joined in 1927. Burundi and Rwanda joined in 2009, and South Sudan joined in 2016. The EAC History has had 3 names since its conception; the East African High Commission from 1948 to 1961, East African Common 1917 - Customs union between Kenya and Uganda is Services Organization from 1961 to 1967, and then from formed. 1967 to 1977 the East African Community. In 1967 the East African Common Services Organization was superseded by 1927 - Tanzania joins the Customs Union. the East African Community, which aimed to strengthen the 1948 - EAC is named the East African High Commission. ties between the members through a common market, a 1961 - The name changes to East African Common common customs tariff, and a range of public serves to help Services Organization. achieve economic growth in the region. In 1977, the East African Community collapsed due to Kenya requesting more 1967 - The East African Common Services Organization is seats in the decision-making organs, disagreements superseded by the East African Community. between member countries, and the different economic 1977 - The East African Community collapses due systems between countries, primarily between Tanzania disagreements between member countries. and Kenya. The East African Community was re-established when its treaty was signed on November 30, 1999, and November 30, 1999 - The East African Community is came into force on July 7, 2000. reestablished when its treaty was signed. Number of member 6 July 7, 2000 - New treaty comes into force. countries: 2009 - Burundi and Rwanda join the EAC. Region(s): Africa 2016 - South Sudan becomes the sixth member of the East Headquarters: Arusha, Tanzania African Community. Composition: Plurilateral Coverage: Goods & Services Signed: November 30, 1999 Entry into force: July 7, 2000 Web Site: http://www.eac.int Country Memo Provided by: globalEDGE.msu.edu and EXPORT.GOV.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Whether a Rwandan Born in Uganda Has Citizenship Rights
Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIRs | Help 22 January 2008 ZZZ102691.E Uganda/Rwanda: Whether a Rwandan born in Uganda has citizenship rights; conditions under which individuals whose ancestors are not Ugandan can obtain Ugandan citizenship; whether citizens of Uganda have rights to free university education; whether international students can attend university in Uganda Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Ottawa Citizenship rights A Rwandan born in Uganda is not automatically granted Ugandan citizenship (Uganda 18 Jan. 2008; ibid. 1995, Chapter 3, Sec. 10; US Mar. 2001, 205). Under Chapter 3, Section 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995, persons granted Ugandan citizenship by birth include: (a) every person born in Uganda one of whose parents or grandparents is or was a member of any of the indigenous communities existing and residing within the borders of Uganda at the first day of February, 1926, and set out in the Third Schedule to this Constitution; and (b) every person born in or outside Uganda one of whose parents or grandparents was at the time of birth of that person a citizen of Uganda by birth. The constitution also outlines several conditions under which an individual whose ancestors are not Ugandan can obtain Ugandan citizenship (Uganda 1995, Chapter 3, Sec. 11-12). For example, abandoned children of no more than five years of age, whose parents are unknown, are considered citizens of the country (ibid., Chapter 3, Sec. 11). An individual under the age of 18 years who is adopted by a Ugandan citizen may also be granted citizenship (ibid.).
[Show full text]
Mozambique Zambia South Africa Zimbabwe Tanzania
UNITED NATIONS MOZAMBIQUE Geospatial 30°E 35°E 40°E L a k UNITED REPUBLIC OF 10°S e 10°S Chinsali M a l a w TANZANIA Palma i Mocimboa da Praia R ovuma Mueda ^! Lua Mecula pu la ZAMBIA L a Quissanga k e NIASSA N Metangula y CABO DELGADO a Chiconono DEM. REP. OF s a Ancuabe Pemba THE CONGO Lichinga Montepuez Marrupa Chipata MALAWI Maúa Lilongwe Namuno Namapa a ^! gw n Mandimba Memba a io u Vila úr L L Mecubúri Nacala Kabwe Gamito Cuamba Vila Ribáué MecontaMonapo Mossuril Fingoè FurancungoCoutinho ^! Nampula 15°S Vila ^! 15°S Lago de NAMPULA TETE Junqueiro ^! Lusaka ZumboCahora Bassa Murrupula Mogincual K Nametil o afu ezi Namarrói Erego e b Mágoè Tete GiléL am i Z Moatize Milange g Angoche Lugela o Z n l a h m a bez e i ZAMBEZIA Vila n azoe Changara da Moma n M a Lake Chemba Morrumbala Maganja Bindura Guro h Kariba Pebane C Namacurra e Chinhoyi Harare Vila Quelimane u ^! Fontes iq Marondera Mopeia Marromeu b am Inhaminga Velha oz P M úngu Chinde Be ni n è SOFALA t of ManicaChimoio o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o gh ZIMBABWE o Bi Mutare Sussundenga Dondo Gweru Masvingo Beira I NDI A N Bulawayo Chibabava 20°S 20°S Espungabera Nova OCE A N Mambone Gwanda MANICA e Sav Inhassôro Vilanculos Chicualacuala Mabote Mapai INHAMBANE Lim Massinga p o p GAZA o Morrumbene Homoíne Massingir Panda ^! National capital SOUTH Inhambane Administrative capital Polokwane Guijá Inharrime Town, village o Chibuto Major airport Magude MaciaManjacazeQuissico International boundary AFRICA Administrative boundary MAPUTO Xai-Xai 25°S Nelspruit Main road 25°S Moamba Manhiça Railway Pretoria MatolaMaputo ^! ^! 0 100 200km Mbabane^!Namaacha Boane 0 50 100mi !\ Bela Johannesburg Lobamba Vista ESWATINI Map No.
[Show full text]
Inequality of Child Mortality Among Ethnic Groups in Sub-Saharan Africa M
Special Theme ±Inequalities in Health Inequality of child mortality among ethnic groups in sub-Saharan Africa M. Brockerhoff1 & P. Hewett2 Accounts by journalists of wars in several countries of sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s have raised concern that ethnic cleavages and overlapping religious and racial affiliations may widen the inequalities in health and survival among ethnic groups throughout the region, particularly among children. Paradoxically, there has been no systematic examination of ethnic inequality in child survival chances across countries in the region. This paper uses survey data collected in the 1990s in 11 countries (Central African Republic, CoÃ te d'Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Namibia, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Uganda, and Zambia) to examine whether ethnic inequality in child mortality has been present and spreading in sub-Saharan Africa since the 1980s. The focus was on one or two groups in each country which may have experienced distinct child health and survival chances, compared to the rest of the national population, as a result of their geographical location. The factors examined to explain potential child survival inequalities among ethnic groups included residence in the largest city, household economic conditions, educational attainment and nutritional status of the mothers, use of modern maternal and child health services including immunization, and patterns of fertility and migration. The results show remarkable consistency. In all 11 countries there were significant differentials between ethnic groups in the odds of dying during infancy or before the age of 5 years. Multivariate analysis shows that ethnic child mortality differences are closely linked with economic inequality in many countries, and perhaps with differential use of child health services in countries of the Sahel region.
[Show full text]
(SSA) Countries IDA19 Fourth Replenishment Meeting, December 12-13, 2019, Stockholm, Sweden
African Countries are Awakening Hope for a Better Tomorrow with IDA Statement by Representatives of 49 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) Countries IDA19 Fourth Replenishment Meeting, December 12-13, 2019, Stockholm, Sweden 1. IDA countries have only 10 years to achieve the globally agreed targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Given that it takes 9 years for pledges under any IDA cycle to be fully paid up, IDA19 is therefore, the last replenishment to help finance the SDGs in the time left to 2030. 2. Africa as a continent is making progress towards the SDGs. Growth in many economies has outpaced global benchmarks. More children are in school and health service coverage is expanding. A continent-wide free-trade agreement shows regional cooperation is alive and deepening, including in building roads and power lines that bring countries together and make markets bigger. The support of donors to the 18th replenishment of the International Development Association (IDA18) has been pivotal and has underpinned the partnership between African countries and the World Bank Group (WBG) that has never been stronger. Indeed, Africa’s absorptive capacity to carefully use concessional funds has ensured that the pace of commitment for IDA18 has been record-breaking. 3. We want to acknowledge the strong partnership between IDA and most of our countries. We commend all donors for the important role that IDA has been playing in the transformation agenda of most SSA countries. We are happy with the negotiated IDA19 package and the continuation of all the special themes of IDA18, the Private Sector Window, and the improvements to the various facilities especially under Fragility, Conflict and Violence (FCV).
[Show full text]
East and Central Africa 19
Most countries have based their long-term planning (‘vision’) documents on harnessing science, technology and innovation to development. Kevin Urama, Mammo Muchie and Remy Twingiyimana A schoolboy studies at home using a book illuminated by a single electric LED lightbulb in July 2015. Customers pay for the solar panel that powers their LED lighting through regular instalments to M-Kopa, a Nairobi-based provider of solar-lighting systems. Payment is made using a mobile-phone money-transfer service. Photo: © Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg via Getty Images 498 East and Central Africa 19 . East and Central Africa Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo (Republic of), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda Kevin Urama, Mammo Muchie and Remy Twiringiyimana Chapter 19 INTRODUCTION which invest in these technologies to take a growing share of the global oil market. This highlights the need for oil-producing Mixed economic fortunes African countries to invest in science and technology (S&T) to Most of the 16 East and Central African countries covered maintain their own competitiveness in the global market. in the present chapter are classified by the World Bank as being low-income economies. The exceptions are Half the region is ‘fragile and conflict-affected’ Cameroon, the Republic of Congo, Djibouti and the newest Other development challenges for the region include civil strife, member, South Sudan, which joined its three neighbours religious militancy and the persistence of killer diseases such in the lower middle-income category after being promoted as malaria and HIV, which sorely tax national health systems from low-income status in 2014.
[Show full text]
Case Studies from Tanzania and Sierra Leone
April 2018 Climate Change Open Data for Sustainable Development: Case Studies From Tanzania and Sierra Leone Prepared for the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data By World Resources Institute Authors: Jesse Worker and Carole Excell Introduction 02 Tanzania: Summary of Findings 04 Sierra Leone: Summary of Findings 05 Methodology 06 Limitations 06 Tanzania 07 Policy Considerations for Open Data: Is there an adequate legal and policy framework for supporting the collection and release of climate data? 08 Data Types: What climate relevant datasets have been prioritized for collection and releases addressing climate changes as defined by a variety of in-country stakeholders? 10 Data Types: What are some specific data types and data sets that you have found to be especially important in addressing climate change? 11 Climate Open Data: Do existing in-country initiatives have a climate and open data focus? 12 Data Sharing and Coordination: Through what means are government institutions sharing climate data? 14 Capacity: What capacity gaps exist for the collection and release of more climate data in Tanzania? 16 Table of Contents Table Sierra Leone 17 Policy Framework 18 Coordinating Committees 19 Priority Data Sets 19 Climate Open Data Initiatives 22 Salone Water Security Website and Data Portal 22 Climate Information, Disaster Management, and Early Warning Systems (CIDMEWS) 22 Capacity: What capacity gaps exist for the collection and release of more climate data? 23 Conclusion: Linking climate data to SDG data movements 24 Annex I: Climate Change and Open Data Survey Instrument 25 INTRODUCTION In Tanzania, the effects of climate change are already being felt.
[Show full text]
Currency Union As a Panacea for Ills in Africa: a New Institutional Framework and Theoretical Consideration
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Currency Union as a Panacea for ills in Africa: A New Institutional Framework and Theoretical Consideration Abban, Stanley Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology 11 December 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105459/ MPRA Paper No. 105459, posted 25 Jan 2021 20:11 UTC 1.0 INTRODUCTION A currency union is a union to which two or more countries agree to surrender their monetary sovereignty to adopt an official currency issued by a Central Bank tasked with formulating and implementing monetary policy. Currency union came to light when there was a need for choosing a suitable exchange rate regime as an improvement on the fixed exchange rate. Comparatively, currency union is superlative to fixed exchange rate due to equalization of price through the laid down nominal convergence criteria and the introduction of a common currency to ensure greater transparency in undertaking transactions (Rose, 2000; Abban, 2020a). Currency union is touted to emanate several gains and has the potential to be disastrous based on the conditionality among member-states. Empirical studies emphasize the main advantages of currency union membership lies with the elimination of exchange rate volatility to increase savings, relaxation of policies that hinder the free movement of persons and capital to improve trade and tourism, price transparency to intensify trade, and the ability to induce greater Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to stimulate intra-trade flows (Rose, 2000; Micco et al., 2003; Aristotelous & Fountas, 2009; Rodriguez et al, 2012). The key areas that benefit from currency union membership include production, the financial market, the labour market, tourism, the private sector, the political environment among others (Karlinger, 2002; Martinez et al, 2018; Formaro, 2020).
[Show full text]
Assessing the Quality of Care in Family Planning, Antenatal, and Sick Child Services at Health Facilities in Kenya, Namibia, and Senegal
ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF CARE IN FaMILY PLANNING, ANTENATAL, AND SICK CHILD SERVICES AT HEALTH FACILITIES IN KENYA, NAMIBIA, AND SENEGAL DHS ANALYTICAL STUDIES 44 SEPTEMBER 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Wenjuan Wang, Mai Do, John Hembling, and Paul Ametepi. DHS Analytical Studies No. 44 Assessing the Quality of Care in Family Planning, Antenatal, and Sick Child Services at Health Facilities in Kenya, Namibia, and Senegal Wenjuan Wang Mai Do John Hembling Paul Ametepi ICF International Rockville, Maryland, USA September 2014 Corresponding author: Wenjuan Wang, International Health and Development, ICF International, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; telephone: +1 301-572-0398: fax: +1 301-572-0950; email: [email protected] Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Sohail Agha for reviewing this report and providing invaluable comments. Editor: Bryant Robey Document Production: Natalie La Roche This study was carried out with support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through The DHS Program (#AID-OAA-C-13-00095). The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. The DHS Program assists countries worldwide in the collection and use of data to monitor and evaluate population, health, and nutrition programs. For additional information about the DHS Program contact: DHS Program, ICF International, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; phone: 301-407-6500, fax: 301-407-6501, email: [email protected], Internet: www.dhsprogram.com.
[Show full text]
African Dialects
African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
[Show full text]
Lessons Learned from Power-Sharing in Africa
8/2008 Lessons Learned from Power-Sharing in Africa Håvard Strand, Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Scott Gates, Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Several power-sharing agreements have been reached in Africa over the last decades. This project has compared the experiences of various forms of power-sharing in five countries, Bu- rundi, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. The cases differ significantly both with regard to the implementation of power-sharing and the rationale for adopting such institutions. Our conclusions is that power-sharing institutions have proven themselves useful in some countries and less so in others. The most positive experiences have been in the peace processes of Sierra Leone and Liberia, where power-sharing played a vital role in securing peace. There are less clear support for power-sharing institutions with regard to good governance. Introduction tions. Inclusive institutions work towards inte- This project describes power-sharing efforts in grating as many voices as possible into the deci- five conflict-prone and ill-governed African sion-making body, whereas exclusive institutions countries: Burundi, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, and create autonomous political spheres. Sierra Leone. While these five countries are The rationale for inclusive institutions as- unique in many important ways, some overar- sumes that exclusion is a key to violent conflict, ching conclusions can nevertheless be drawn and is therefore very focused on not excluding from these studies. Our studies support the any relevant group. The inclusive answer is to conclusion that power-sharing can be a useful provide some guarantees to all parties, so that remedy under certain conditions.
[Show full text]
The Populat Kenya
£ 4 World Population Year THE POPULAT KENYA - UGANDA - TANZANIA CI.CR.E.D. Senes THE POPULATION OF KENYA- UGANDA - TANZANIA SIMEON OMINDE Professor of Geography and Head of Department, University of Nairobi 1974 World Population Year C.I.C.R.E.D Series This study was initiated and financed by C.I.C.R.E.D. (Committee for International Coordination of National Research in Demography) to coincide with 1974 World Population Year. © Simeon Ominde © C.I.C.R.E.D. First published 1975 Printed in Kenya by Kenya Litho Ltd., P.O. Box 40775, Changamwe Road, Nairobi. CONTENTS Page PREFACE ¡v Chapter 1 The Area and Estimates of Population Growth 1 Chapter 2 Components of Population Growth 11 Chapter 3 Migration 40 Chapter 4 Population Composition 59 Chapter 5 Population Distribution 73 Chapter 6 Urbanization 88 Chapter 7 Labour Force 97 Chapter 8 Population Projection 105 Chapter 9 Population Growth and Socio-Economic Development 115 Conclusion 123 PREFACE This monograph presents the population situation in the area covered by Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya. The material has been prepared at the request of CICRED, as part of its contribution to the objectives of the World Population Year, 1974. In common with other developing countries of Africa, the East African countries are becoming acutely aware of the importance of rapid population growth and its significance to the attainment of development objectives. It has become increasingly clear that with the current rates of growth and the limited resources, the burden of socio-economic development programmes has become more serious. The search for alternative strategies to development must therefore focus attention on the impact of accelerating growth rate which leads to retardation of the rate of economic and social development.
[Show full text]
Carp (No Common Name) (Labeo Longipinnis)
Labeo longipinnis (a carp, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2012 Revised, April 2018 Web Version, 5/16/2018 Photo: J. P. Sullivan. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Available: http://eol.org/data_objects/17785833. (April 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Moelants (2010): “This species is known from Central Africa Republic to Angola, and Tanzania.” “Central Africa: Labeo longipinnis is known from throughout the Congo River Basin.” “Eastern Africa: One record has been made from Lake Tanganyika (Reid 1985).” “Native: Angola (Angola); Central African Republic; Congo, The Democratic Republic of the; Tanzania, United Republic of” From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Africa: widespread in the Congo River basin, Luapula-Mweru excluded [Tshibwabwa 1997]. Single record from Lake Tanganyika [Reid 1985] unconfirmed [Tshibwabwa 1997] and doubtful.” 1 Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the U.S. There is no indication that this species is in trade in the U.S. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the U.S. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae
[Show full text]