DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ALFRED BOG L PEATLAND INVENTORY and EVALUATION L L L Prepared for 586565 Ontario Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ALFRED BOG L PEATLAND INVENTORY and EVALUATION L L L Prepared for 586565 Ontario Inc AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION bird and hale ltd. BIOPHYSICAL INVENTORY AND CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND BIOLOGISTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT l REFUSE AND SOLID 1263 BAY STREET - . WASTE SYSTEMS TORONTO, ONTARIO M5R 2C1 REMOTE SENSING 416-925-1147 S.J. GLENN BIRD, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., O.L.S. MEMBER: Association of IAN M. HALE, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Consulting Engineers of Canada l l 31Ge7NW8881 63.4497 ALFRED 010 l THE ALFRED BOG l PEATLAND INVENTORY AND EVALUATION l l l prepared for 586565 Ontario Inc. l c/o Hardee Farms International Inc l l by l Bird and Hale Limited l l l l November, 1984. File No. 84-135 l l l Exectutive Summary l Study Area Location The Alfred Bog is located in Alfred and Caledonia Townships in Prescott County. It is situated between Highways 17 and 417 and is accessible from Ottawa by driving east for l approximately one hour on Highway 17 to the town of Alfred and then south 5 km. l The total area of the bog is reported to be approximately 4,000 hectares, of which 1,500 hectares are owned by Hardee Farms International Limited. The latter portion of the bog l forms the study area (shown on Key Map 1). Objectives l The primary objectives of this study are, to inventory the peat resources of the study area and to determine the potential for development of these resources for the l extraction of fuel and horticultural peat and agricultural l use. Study Method The objectives of the study were accomplished through; review l of available published data, detailed field investigation, laboratory analysis of peat and agricultural soil samples, and evaluation of the data acquired to determine the l development potentials of the peat resources. l Potential for Utilization The general criteria that affect the overall utilization l potential of the peat resources of the study area are: access, climate, topography, drainage, vegetation, stump content, and previous uses and modifications. Summaries of l these criteria follow. Access l The Alfred Bog is located approximately 75 km from Ottawa and 110 km from Montreal. Access is available via numerous hard and loose surface all weather roads. A Canadian Pacific l Railway line is located 5 km north of the study area. The proximity and accessibility to these potential markets l enhance the development potential of the peat resources. l l i l Climate The climate is conducive to the harvest of peat resources t Southern Ontario has been rated as having the most favourable l conditions within Ontario for traditional peat harvesting methods. l Climatic conditions are also acceptable for production of a wide range of field crops. l Topography The domed and elevated nature of the study area will l facilitate development of an effective drainage network and l grading of production fields to promote good site drainage. Drainage The existing municipal drainage network and drainage ditches l within the study area should be suitable as drainage outlets. Potential appears to be good for improving site drainage through clearing and extension of existing, and construction l of additional, drainage ditches. l Vegetation The open, as opposed to treed, nature of the majority of the study area will minimize the cost of clearing the pentland l surface. l Stump Content The stump content of the peat is low and is anticipated to l pose only minor constraints to development. Previous Uses and Modifications l Historically, portions of the Alfred Bog have been used for agriculture and for peat extraction. The associated modifications, such as draining and clearing, should be l permitted to continue. However, measures should be taken to ensure that detrimental environmental impacts to adjacent l lands do not occur. Potential for Extraction of Fuel and Horticultural Peat l The specific criteria that determine the suitability of the study area for the extraction of fuel and horticultural peat l are described below. l 11 l l Area and Depth The Hardee Farms property has a total area of 1,500 hectares l of which 1,479 hectares are considered to be suitable for development of peat extraction operations (i.e. area with peat depth in excess of 1.2 m). The peat depth ranges from 1.2 to 7.1 metres and the average depth is 4.5 metres. The l suitable area and average depth are far in excess of those considered necessary for development of peat extraction l operations. l Volume The Hardee Farms holdings are estimated to contain a total of approximately 67.36 million cubic metres of peat in the area that is considered suitable for development of peat l extraction operations. l Fuel Peat Extraction Potential is good for extraction of a large volume of good l quality fuel grade peat from the Hardee Farms holdings on the Alfred Bog. It is estimated that a total volume of 56.72 million cubic metres of fuel grade peat is available for harvest. This would produce an estimated 28.36 million l cubic metres of final product (milled fuel peat at 507o moisture content). This fuel peat has an average calorific value of 4813 calories per gram, an average ash content of l 5.757o, and an average sulfur content of Q.044%. l Horticultural Peat Extraction All of the peat in the study area (67.36 million cubic l metres) is suitable for horticultural use. Two types of horticultural peat occur, these are sphagnum peat moss (6.94 million cubic metres) and reed-sedge peat (60.42 million l cubic metres). The sphagnum peat moss occurs as a continuous surface stratum across the majority of the property, it ranges from O to 1.3 metres and averages 0.5 metres in depth. An estimated 6.94 million cubic metres of sphagnum moss peat occur in the study area. This should produce approximately 1,62 million cubic metres of good quality horticultural sphagnum moss peat at I 507o moisture content. An estimated total of 60.42 million cubic metres of reed- l sedge peat occur. This should produce approximately 28.36 million cubic metres of harvested final product at 5070 l moisture content. This is the good qualitiy fuel grade peat l 111 l referred to in the previous section, however it is also l suitable for uses as horticultural peat. l Potential For Agricultural Use The study area can be made suitable for agricultural use through, draining, clearing of surface vegetation, liming and fertilization. These are standard management techniques for l agricultural use of peatlands. l Recommendations It is recommended that an economic feasibility study be l conducted prior to development of the study area for the previously described uses. This study should include determination of the bog development costs and market l analysis. If development for any, or all, of the described uses is determined to be economically feasible a development plan l should be prepared. This plan should include preparation of a drainage plan and determination of the environmental impli l cations that are specific to the intended use. l l l l l l l l l l IV l 3IG(S7NWe0ei 63.4497 ALFRED 010C l TABLE OF C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i l 1. INTRODUCTION l 1.1 Study Area Location l 1.2 Objectives l l 1.3 Scope 3 l 2. PROCEDURES 2.1 Preliminary Investigations 4 l 2.2 Field Investigations 4 2.3 Data Analysis 6 l 3. OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSION 3.1 Climate 9 l 3.2 Geology and Geomorphology 11 3.3 Peatland Formation 12 3.4 Area and Shape 12 l 3.5 Topography 14 3.6 Drainage 14 3.7 Vegetation 17 3.8 Peat Characteristics 21 l i) Peat Depth 21 ii) Peat Type 23 iii) Peat Humification 23 l 3.9 Peat Volumes 24 3.10 Stump Content 24 3.11 Previous Modifications and Uses 25 l 3.12 Present Use 27 3.13 Potential For Utilization 27 i) Potential for Fuel Peat Extraction 29 ii) Potential for Horticultural Peat Extraction 32 l iii) Potential for Agriculture 35 l APPENDICES Appendix A Ground Photographs 37 l Appendix B Site Data Record Sheet 41 Appendix C - Keys to Peatland Classification 43 Appendix D Peat Type Classification 55 Appendix E Identification of Peat Types 59 l Appendix F Laboratory Results 61 Appendix G Von Post Scale of Decomposition (Humification) 74 l Appendix H Calculation of Stump Content 77 Appendix I Classification of Peat and Peat Moss 79 l Appendix J References 81 l l l Table of Contents cont©d page TABLES l Table l - Climatic Data Summary 10 Table 2 - Summary of Vegetation Cover Types 18 Table 3 - Tree Cover Analysis 19 l Table 4 - Dominant Vegetation Species 22 Table 5 - Average Peat Depths 21 Table 6 - Peat Volumes 24 l Table 7 - Fuel Peat Characteristics 31 l FIGURES AND MAPS Key Map I - Alfred Bog Study Area 2 Key Map II - Past and Present Extent of the l Alfred Bog 13 Figure l - Drainage Ditch Profiles 16 Dwg. No. l - Base Map Inside Back Cover Dwg. No. 2 - Elevation Map " l Dwg. No. 3 - Isopach Map " Dwg. No. 4 - Peatland Classification Map " Peat Type and Peat Humification Profiles: l B200S to B2200N " B2400N to B4800N " B5000N to B7400N " l LOGO " L1000N " L2000N " L3000N " l L4000N " L5000N " L6000N " l L7000N " l l l l l l l l 1 u* INTRPPUCTION 1.1 Study Area Location 1 The Alfred Bog is located in Alfred and Caledonia Townships in Prescott County. The total area of the bog is reported to be approximately 4,000 hectares (Cuddy, 1982), of which 1,500 1 hectares are owned by Hardee Farms International Limited.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re-Assessing the Vertical Distribution of Testate Amoeba Communities in Surface Peats: Implications for Palaeohydrological Studies
    Re-assessing the vertical distribution of testate amoeba communities in surface peats: implications for palaeohydrological studies Roe, H. M., Elliott, S. M., & Patterson, R. T. (2017). Re-assessing the vertical distribution of testate amoeba communities in surface peats: implications for palaeohydrological studies. European Journal of Protistology, 60, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2017.03.006 Published in: European Journal of Protistology Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2017 Elsevier. This manuscript is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct. 2021 Re-assessing the vertical distribution of testate amoeba communities in surface peats: implications for palaeohydrological studies Helen M.
    [Show full text]
  • Peat and Peatland Resources of Southeastern Ontario
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017, Jones Road, Near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber)
    Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton Toronto Entomologists’ Association Occasional Publication # 48-2018 European Skippers mudpuddling, July 6, 2017, Jones Road, near Blackhawk, RAIN (Photo: Michael Dawber) Dusted Skipper, April 20, 2017, Ipperwash Beach, LAMB American Snout, August 6, 2017, (Photo: Bob Yukich) Dunes Beach, PRIN (Photo: David Kaposi) ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 Edited and Compiled by Rick Cavasin and Jessica E. Linton April 2018 Published by the Toronto Entomologists’ Association Toronto, Ontario Production by Jessica Linton TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION Board of Directors: (TEA) Antonia Guidotti: R.O.M. Representative Programs Coordinator The TEA is a non-profit educational and scientific Carolyn King: O.N. Representative organization formed to promote interest in insects, to Publicity Coordinator encourage cooperation among amateur and professional Steve LaForest: Field Trips Coordinator entomologists, to educate and inform non-entomologists about insects, entomology and related fields, to aid in the ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA preservation of insects and their habitats and to issue Published annually by the Toronto Entomologists’ publications in support of these objectives. Association. The TEA is a registered charity (#1069095-21); all Ontario Lepidoptera 2017 donations are tax creditable. Publication date: April 2018 ISBN: 978-0-921631-53-7 Membership Information: Copyright © TEA for Authors All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be Annual dues: reproduced or used without written permission. Individual-$30 Student-free (Association finances permitting – Information on submitting records, notes and articles to beyond that, a charge of $20 will apply) Ontario Lepidoptera can be obtained by contacting: Family-$35 Jessica E.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Lawrence Lowlands (#132)
    ST. LAWRENCE LOWLANDS (#132) The St. Lawrence Lowlands ecoregion stretches along the fertile lands of the Ottawa and St. Lawrence rivers. It is characterized by farmlands, cities, mixed woods and wetlands. The St. Lawrence River is larger (by discharge) than any other river in North America. This ecoregion provides habitat for over 55 species at risk, and includes over 35 species of global conservation concern, four of which occur only in Canada. This ecoregion includes several large cities and areas that are intensively farmed. Almost 42% of this ecoregion remains in natural cover and only 3.7% is within conserved/protected areas. LOCATION The St. Lawrence Lowlands ecoregion is centred on the Ottawa and St. Lawrence rivers and stretches from Quebec City to the Frontenac Axis in Ontario. It is bounded on the north by the hilly Laurentian Highlands, and the Appalachians to the south. In the U.S., this ecoregion is part of the Eastern Great Lakes and extends into northern New York. It is included in the Nature Conservancy of Canada’s (NCC’s) St. Lawrence and Lake Champlain Valley ecoregion. There are slight discrepancies between the boundaries of the St. Lawrence Lowlands ecoregion and the boundaries of Quebec’s St. Lawrence Lowlands Natural Province, namely in the southern Outaouais, southeastern Mauricie and eastern Montérégie areas. CLIMATE/GEOLOGY The ecoregion is marked by warm summers and cold, snowy winters. The mean annual temperature is approximately 5⁰C. The mean summer temperatures is 16.5⁰C and the mean winter tem- perature is -7⁰C. The mean annual precipitation ranges from 800 to 1,000 millimetres.
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Resources of Southeastern Ontario
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Bog a Conservation Success Story …
    Alfred Bog A conservation success story … The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club The very rare Bog Elfin is found in the Alfred Bog. Alfred Bog By Don Cuddy (retired) Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Kemptville (First published in The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club’s magazine—Trail & Landscape, 1983-Vol. 17, No. 3) With a foreword—July, 2008. by Frank Pope, This reprint also includes additions to the species lists from Ted Mosquin’s study “The Alfred Bog: An Ecological Study” Cover Photo— ‘Bog Elfin’ by Tom Murray Massachusetts Butterfly Club ©The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club Published 1983 Amended and Reprinted 2008 2 Foreword Don Cuddy was among relatively few people who appreciated the biological value of Alfred Bog. He shared his knowledge in the 1983 article. Later, “The Alfred Bog: An Ecological Study” a report by Ted Mosquin, added to our knowledge. As long as the bog was zoned “conservation” in the municipal plan there was little concern about its preservation. In the 1970s there was much interest in market gardening and an inter- national vegetable retailer acquired a large block of land in the bog for market gardening. At that time the Holland Marsh was a leading producer of vegetables. When they discovered the conservation zoning they requested a change to “agriculture” and the municipality made this change in 1982. Recognizing the danger to the biological integrity of the bog, The Vankleek Hill Nature Society and The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club appealed the change of zoning to the Ontario Municipal Board. The Board ruled in favour of the municipality. It appeared that the only hope of saving the bog would be to purchase the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodlot Owners
    C ANADIAN M ODEL F OREST N ETWORK Private Woodland Owners — Meeting the Stewardship Challenge Prepared by Erin Neave and Doug Wolthausen Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada Canadian model forest network Forest Regions of Canada Canadian Model Forest Network Boreal — Predominantly Forest 1 McGregor Model Forest Boreal — Forest and Grassland 2 Foothills Model Forest Boreal — Forest and Barren 3 Prince Albert Model Forest Great Lakes — St. Lawrence 4 Manitoba Model Forest Montane 5 Lake Abitibi Model Forest Coast 6 Eastern Ontario Model Forest Columbia 7 Waswanipi Cree Model Forest Deciduous 8 Bas-Saint-Laurent Model Forest Subalpine 9 Fundy Model Forest Acadian 10 Nova Forest Alliance Grassland 11 Western Newfoundland Model Forest Tundra Forestry Centres and Headquarters of the Canadian Forest Service 1 3 11 2 7 4 8 5 9 10 6 Copies of this publication may be obtained in English or French free of charge from: © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2004 Natural Resources Canada Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Canadian Forest Service Model Forest Secretariat Main entry under title : Private Woodland Owners — 580 Booth Street Meeting the Stewardship Challenge Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4 At head of title: Canadian Model Forest Network. Telephone: (613) 992-5874 Fax: (613) 992-5390 ISBN 0-662-38221-8 Internet site: www.modelforest.net Cat. no. Fo52-3/2004E-PDF or visit: www.woodlotscanada.ca Acknowledgements This report is dedicated to all woodlot owners The Private Woodlot Strategic Initiative steering across Canada who have placed a priority on group consists of representatives of the woodlot caring for their woodlots, allocating time and community across Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Canadian Wetlands
    GEOSCIENCE CANADA Volume 31 Number 2 June 2004 57 géologues n’ont pas prêté suffisamment paleoecological tools. Further, these d’attention aux terres humides. Cela tools can be applied to elucidate more tient en partie à une mauvaise precisely what and how the geological connaissance de la géologie des terres connections are with wetlands, and what humides et de ce que sont ces éléments if any, the relationships are between the géomorphologiques. Comme éléments vast array of different wetland types. géomorphologiques, les terres humides Wetlands are intimately connected to the ont ceci de particulier qu’elles sont surroundings of their individual basins principalement constituées de matériaux and to their watersheds. The geology of biologiques issus de processus wetlands focuses on understanding these biologiques, et non de minéraux et de relationships (Moore, 2001). Geology of Canadian roches formées par des processus The importance of geology in Wetlands physiques. Il existe deux grands groupes wetland science seems to have escaped de terres humides, soit les terres the attention of most geologists, despite humides minérales, généralement situées covering about 15% and being a Barry G. Warner en milieux de hautes énergies, et les distinctive part of the Canadian land- Wetlands Research Centre tourbières, situées en milieux de basses scape. Part of the problem is that University of Waterloo énergies, et dont le développement wetlands have long been an enigma. Are Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 comporte une étape de terrestrialisation they landforms, soil units, water features [email protected] ou de tourbification. or vegetation communities? The answer Tant comme élément topo- is yes, to all of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Were Provided by the Report's Author, At
    With the exception of the letter to the Minister and Executive Summary, (which were provided by the Report’s author, at his request), this Report is a translation of the Report (Alfred Campus – Looking toward the Future: Analysis and Options) by Marc P. Godbout, Oct 31, 2014. The Report was translated from French into English by an Ontario government-approved translator. This Report was researched and written by Marc P. Godbout, with funding from the government of Ontario. The ideas, opinions, recommendations and proposals provided in this Report are those of the author. The presence of such opinions, recommendations, ideas or proposals in this Report is not an endorsement by the government of Ontario. 1 Alfred Campus Looking toward the Future: Analysis and Options Final Report Presented to the Ontario Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs October 31, 2014 Marc P. Godbout Facilitator 2 Ottawa (Ontario) October 31, 2014 The Honorable Jeff Leal Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 11th Floor 77 Grenville Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 1B3 Minister, Following a diagnostic of the present situation, an extensive Consultative Process, an in-depth research and analysis process, a thorough examination of best practices and more importantly, a clear understanding of the needs of the students and the agricultural community, I feel comfortable to recommend the following course of actions for the “renewal and revitalization of the Alfred Campus” to better serve the agriculture and “agro-alimentaire” francophone community of Ontario. The preferred option which I am sharing in this final report, reflect the need for the educational system to link itself to the economic development strategy of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Management Plan March 2018
    SOUTH NATION CONSERVATION FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN MARCH 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 7 2 PLAN ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................... 7 2.1 PLAN PREPARATION DETAILS ................................................................................. 7 2.2 PLANNING CYCLE ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ........................................................................................... 8 2.4 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ....................................................................................... 8 3 PROPERTY INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 8 3.1 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ......................................................................... 8 3.2 PLAN AUTHOR INFORMATION .................................................................................. 9 3.3 LOCATION & GENERAL DESCRIPTION .................................................................... 9 3.4 PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ..................................................................................11 3.5 PROPERTY TAX PROGRAMS ...................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • OTTAWA VALLEY Natural Area Conservation Plan II (NACP) Québec and Ontario Regions
    ` OTTAWA VALLEY Natural Area Conservation Plan II (NACP) Québec and Ontario Regions Primary Authors: Gary Bell, Nature Conservancy of Canada (The Conservancy), Project Manager – Eastern Ontario Caroline Gagné, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Project Manager – Québec region; Louise Gratton, Consultant Tanya Pulfer, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Conservation Biologist – Ontario Region Brenda Van Sleeuwen, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Conservation Biologist – Eastern Ontario Approval Step Date RVP Authorization 12 June 2013 President’s Approval 13 November 2013 Regional Board Approval 19 November 2013 Conservation Committee Recommendation 2 December 2013 National Board Approval 6 December 2013 Conservation Committee Recommendation to the National Board of Directors: That, pursuant to the Conservation Policy Framework adopted on September 29, 2006, the National Board of Directors approve the Ottawa Valley Natural Area Conservation Plan per clause 2.1 and further approve Conservation Projects in accordance with clause 2.2 a, subject to completion of satisfactory annual reports per clause 2.6 a. Nature Conservancy of Canada- Ottawa Valley Natural Area Conservation Plan II i Ottawa Valley Natural Area Conservation Plan II Executive Summary Vision Statement The Ottawa Valley Natural Area (NA) is conserved as an area of remarkable natural habitats sustaining secure populations of plants and animals and supported by a proud and engaged local community. The Nature Conservancy of Canada plays a lead role in the conservation of the NA. Goals 1. To conserve rare ecosystems and representative communities by enlarging and consolidating core conservation areas with emphasis on alvars, sand dunes, bogs, fens and grassland bird communities. 2. To ensure functional ecological linkages between core conservation areas, focusing on two areas (a) on the north shore between Sheenboro and Gatineau Park and (b) between Alfred Bog and the City of Ottawa.
    [Show full text]
  • METHANE PRODUCTION in CANADIAN MUSKEG BOGS By
    METHANE PRODUCTION IN CANADIAN MUSKEG BOGS by ANN BROWN Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree in Biology BIBUOTH^QUK OtLA feOtt&wJ of a** University of Ottawa 1989 , Ottawa, Canada, 1989. UMI Number: DC53945 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform DC53945 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 METHANE PRODUCTION IN CANADIAN MUSKEG BOGS page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PEAT DEVELOPMENT 4 2.1 HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF BOG ECOLOGY 2.1.1 Europe 2.1.2 Canada 7 2.2 DISTRIBUTION OF BOGS 10 2.3 ECONOMIC USES OF PEAT 13 2.4 WETLAND SUCCESSION 15 2.4.1 Hydrological Model 2.4.2 Water Chemistry 16 2.4.3 Mire Development 17 2.4.3.1 Minerotrophic Fen 2.4.3.2 Ombrotrophic Bog 18 2.4.3.3 Raised Bogs 19 2.4.3.4 Blanket Bogs 2.4.4 Official Classification 20 2.4.5 Raised Water Table 2.4.5.1 Peat Bog Vegetation
    [Show full text]