Solving the Everglades Riddle: Addressing Water Quality and Quantity to Restore a Florida Legacy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Solving the Everglades Riddle: Addressing Water Quality and Quantity to Restore a Florida Legacy BACKGROUNDER Solving the Everglades Riddle: Addressing Water Quality and Quantity to Restore a Florida Legacy By Dan Peterson Director, Center for Property Rights at The James Madison Institute federal, and local governments have wrangled over funding A Florida Riddle it, and environmental activists have leveraged it. What singular policy issue has lingered in Florida, In 2014, voters approved Amendment 1 dedicating despite having been discussed for decades, hotly debated one-third of doc stamp revenue for the next 20 years for in multiple legislative sessions, and subject to expensive statewide environmental preservation purposes including lobbying efforts? What issue has induced emotional pleas, “to acquire, restore, improve and manage conservation received billions of dollars to spend on planning and lands…including the Everglades.” This action brought new projects, and continues to be a costly and complex effort? visibility to statewide environmental needs as well as further If you answered, “Restoring the Everglades” you win debate to the issue of Everglades restoration. In order to the prize. For decades, one of Florida’s top environmental more fully understand and appreciate the complexities of challenges has been the restoration of the Everglades. restoring the Everglades today, it is imperative to take a Scientists have studied it, legislators have debated it, state, brief look back in time for a helpful perspective. www.jamesmadison.org | 1 A Brief History of northern Everglades and many along the banks of Lake Okeechobee. While dairy farming and cattle ranching the Florida Everglades spread north of the lake, tomatoes, sugar cane, beans, The effort to subdue the Everglades area began as early peas, peppers and potatoes became the dominant as 1850 with the Swamplands Act, which transferred crops to the south. To protect these communities 20 million acres from the federal government to the and agriculture interests, small muck levies were state for the purpose of drainage and reclamation. In constructed. 1881, the state sold 4 million acres of land to developer In the 1920s, devastation hit when two hurricanes Hamilton Disston for $1 million – which according to led to massive flooding and thousands of deaths. One an article in the New York Times during that period of those storms flooded hundreds of acres of farmlands was reportedly the most and killed approximately 2,000 people. land ever purchased by In response to this catastrophe, President Herbert a single person in world Hoover ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers history. He sought to drain (USACE) to assist the communities affected. The result part of the Everglades was a massive government plan to construct a dike in the Kissimmee River around Lake Okeechobee to control future flooding. region by constructing In the effort to prevent too much water from a canal connecting Lake accumulating in the lake, additional plans were laid Okeechobee to Lake for canals to be constructed from the lake west to the Hicpochee at the headwaters Caloosahatchee River and east to the St. Lucie River of the Caloosahatchee River. as vents to relieve excess water. Congress authorized U.S. Geological Survey reconstructed Landsat image So successful was he in construction of the dike and canals. The result: the of the Florida Everglades circa 1850 (left) and actual freeing land for agriculture population in the surrounding towns tripled and Landsat image from 2000 (right) that the value of his land agricultural production soared. More Than 100 soon doubled, bringing an In the 1930s, the USACE began the task. The result of its work became known as the Herbert Hoover Dike Years of Change influx of people migrating to the area. (HHD), a 143-mile earthen dam that surrounds the As a result of many A much broader initiative lake. factors including population began in 1905. Florida In 1947, another major hurricane hit South Florida causing widespread flooding and property loss. As a increases, development Governor Napoleon Bonaparte Broward began result, in 1948, Congress authorized the creation of growth, ranching and a policy of draining the the Central and Southern Florida Project to provide agricultural industries, as Everglades to “create” better flood control by constructing a series of canals, land for agriculture and levees, and other water control structures. The canals well as the construction of development. This opened connecting Lake Okeechobee to the Atlantic Ocean the Central and Southern the door for population were widened and deepened. Florida Flood Control District, growth in Southeast Florida With greater flood control and conveyance of – from roughly 23,000 in water came population growth along the east coast of today the Everglades area 1900 to nearly 230,000 by Florida. As demand for development to the west grew, is approximately one-half its 1930 – as well as helped the water from the eastern Everglades was drained and original size. early population growth in communities, such as Plantation, Hialeah, Wellington, cities such as Miami and Weston, Boca Raton, Parkland and Coral Springs, Fort Lauderdale. It was flourished. also during this time period that another significant As a result of many factors including population transformation of the Everglades took place with the increases, development growth, ranching and construction of the Tamiami Trail connecting Miami agricultural industries, as well as the construction of to Naples (1915-1928). the Central and Southern Florida Project, today the As more people moved to Florida to make a Everglades area is approximately one-half its original 1 life, numerous small towns were established in the size . BACKGROUNDER | Solving the Everglades Riddle A map showing the immensity of the Everglades ecosystem and the areas which it affects. The ecosystem of the Everglades covers and affects more territory than most people think. Thus, its restoration will have widespread impact. The Everglades Problem Defined American inventor and businessman Charles Kettering once said, “a problem well-stated is a problem half-solved.” When it comes to restoring the Everglades, two major challenges stand out. Challenge 1: Controlling Water Quantity It is a perplexing task to find the balance between Today, Florida is home to more than 20 million meeting environmental, agricultural and human residents. The increasing development needs of people needs for water, all while preventing flooding in areas and the accompanying economic growth have made of concern. Several methods have been or are being Florida the third most populous state, and one of the examined to store and convey water. most influential and economically viable in the country. It is important to be aware of the diverse goals for For example, statistics from 2014 show the financial storing water. They include preparing for future water impact of agricultural commodities has grown to more supply, flood control, aquifer recharge, water cleansing, than $13 billion annually. Florida agricultural exports and land restoration. Several methods are used, or can alone were valued at more than $4 billion2 for the third be used, including: year in a row. Such production, along with the millions • Storage Reservoirs: artificially created man- of jobs supported by agriculture, makes Florida a made “lakes” on government owned property. desirable place to work and live for economic mobility. They can cover thousands of acres of land and While the water management efforts of the last be quite deep (10-12 feet). As much as 200,000 century helped to support population and industry acre-feet of excess water can be diverted into growth, there were unintended consequences. It is no these reservoirs. These are costly and usually longer possible to restore the Everglades to its original constructed by the government. size and watershed extent. However, numerous plans, • Flow Equalization Basins: shallow versions of including a multitude of federal and state projects, reservoirs with maximum depths of 3 to 4 feet. have been, and are, at work to address environmental They are used to capture and temporarily store concerns. Billions of dollars have been spent to secure peak stormwater flows. They often flow into a balance of maintaining quality of life for residents Stormwater Treatment Areas or STAs. These are while restoring the remainder of the Everglades. more simple to construct and more economical. Restoring the Everglades, and dealing with its related issues, is certainly not Florida’s only environmental • Water Farms: privately owned properties where problem, but it is one of the most complex and government pays the owner to allow excess important. This Backgrounder from The James water to be “stored.” Sizes vary and the water is Madison Institute outlines many of the reasons. generally 2 to 4 feet in depth. Despite the lack www.jamesmadison.org | 3 of depth, tens of thousands of acre-feet of water As important as controlling the quantity of water can be stored in a single water farm. is the need to clean water in order to reduce the • Aquifer Storage & Recovery: wells are drilled concentration of nutrients, such as phosphorous and to deep into the aquifer in places where the a lesser degree, nitrogen. Methods for this include: geology is appropriate for storage. During wet • Stormwater Treatment Areas (STAs): large seasons, water is treated and pumped into these man-made wetlands designed to maximize wells creating a “bubble” of fresh water in the nutrient removal from agricultural runoff. They aquifer. Water can be “stored” here until the dry are built on large tracts of land rivaling, in some season returns and water is needed. It can then cases, the size of cities such as Ft. Lauderdale be pumped back out for whatever purposes are (more than 20,000 acres). Large pumps pull tens needed. of thousands of gallons per minute of storm • Deep Injection Wells: wells drilled deep into water from canals and force it to flow through the “boulder zone” approximately 3,000-4,000 these wetland areas, where the nutrients are feet below the surface.
Recommended publications
  • The Everglades: Wetlands Not Wastelands Marjory Stoneman Douglas Overcoming the Barriers of Public Unawareness and the Profit Motive in South Florida
    The Everglades: Wetlands not Wastelands Marjory Stoneman Douglas Overcoming the Barriers of Public Unawareness and the Profit Motive in South Florida Manav Bansal Senior Division Historical Paper Paper Length: 2,496 Bansal 1 "Marjory was the first voice to really wake a lot of us up to what we were doing to our quality of life. She was not just a pioneer of the environmental movement, she was a prophet, calling out to us to save the environment for our children and our grandchildren."1 - Florida Governor Lawton Chiles, 1991-1998 ​ Introduction Marjory Stoneman Douglas was a vanguard in her ideas and approach to preserve the Florida Everglades. She not only convinced society that Florida’s wetlands were not wastelands, but also educated politicians that its value transcended profit. From the late 1800s, attempts were underway to drain large parts of the Everglades for economic gain.2 However, from the mid to late 20th century, Marjory Stoneman Douglas fought endlessly to bring widespread attention to the deteriorating Everglades and increase public awareness regarding its importance. To achieve this goal, Douglas broke societal, political, and economic barriers, all of which stemmed from the lack of familiarity with environmental conservation, apathy, and the near-sighted desire for immediate profit without consideration for the long-term impacts on Florida’s ecosystem. Using her voice as a catalyst for change, she fought to protect the Everglades from urban development and draining, two actions which would greatly impact the surrounding environment, wildlife, and ultimately help mitigate the effects of climate change. By educating the public and politicians, she served as a model for a new wave of environmental activism and she paved the way for the modern environmental movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources
    Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources Everglades National Park was created primarily because of its unique flora and fauna. In the 1920s and 1930s there was some limited understanding that the park might contain significant prehistoric archeological resources, but the area had not been comprehensively surveyed. After establishment, the park’s first superintendent and the NPS regional archeologist were surprised at the number and potential importance of archeological sites. NPS investigations of the park’s archeological resources began in 1949. They continued off and on until a more comprehensive three-year survey was conducted by the NPS Southeast Archeological Center (SEAC) in the early 1980s. The park had few structures from the historic period in 1947, and none was considered of any historical significance. Although the NPS recognized the importance of the work of the Florida Federation of Women’s Clubs in establishing and maintaining Royal Palm State Park, it saw no reason to preserve any physical reminders of that work. Archeological Investigations in Everglades National Park The archeological riches of the Ten Thousand Islands area were hinted at by Ber- nard Romans, a British engineer who surveyed the Florida coast in the 1770s. Romans noted: [W]e meet with innumerable small islands and several fresh streams: the land in general is drowned mangrove swamp. On the banks of these streams we meet with some hills of rich soil, and on every one of those the evident marks of their having formerly been cultivated by the savages.812 Little additional information on sites of aboriginal occupation was available until the late nineteenth century when South Florida became more accessible and better known to outsiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons GIS Center GIS Center 5-4-2015 Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H. Richards Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, [email protected] Daniel Gann GIS-RS Center, Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/gis Recommended Citation Richards, Jennifer H. and Gann, Daniel, "Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park" (2015). GIS Center. 29. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/gis/29 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the GIS Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GIS Center by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Final Report for VEGETATION TRENDS IN INDICATOR REGIONS OF EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK Task Agreement No. P12AC50201 Cooperative Agreement No. H5000-06-0104 Host University No. H5000-10-5040 Date of Report: Feb. 12, 2015 Principle Investigator: Jennifer H. Richards Dept. of Biological Sciences Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-3102 (phone), 305-348-1986 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) Co-Principle Investigator: Daniel Gann FIU GIS/RS Center Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-1971 (phone), 305-348-6445 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) Park Representative: Jimi Sadle, Botanist Everglades National Park 40001 SR 9336 Homestead, FL 33030 305-242-7806 (phone), 305-242-7836 (Fax) FIU Administrative Contact: Susie Escorcia Division of Sponsored Research 11200 SW 8th St. – MARC 430 Miami, FL 33199 305-348-2494 (phone), 305-348-6087 (FAX) 2 Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Honor of Marjory Stoneman Douglas, Guardian of the Everglades
    I I lr4sTIluTEFOn SCientifiC IN f0t7MAT10N@ I 3501 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 191Cd In Honor of Marjory Stoneman Douglas, I Guardian of the Everglades [ Number 33 Auizust 14, 1989 This essay considers the life and work of Marjory Stoneman Douglas (1890- ), an authority on the Florida Everglades whose writings and advocacy have made her one of the most celebrated defenders of that subtropicalregion, Also discussedis a bronze sratue of a Ftorida panther by Philadelphia scufptor Eric Berg, which ISI@ has commissioned for installation in the Everglades NationaI Park. Activism on behalf of the environment, tually, we visited the Everglades National at least on a broad scale, seems a relatively Park together, where I purchased her books. recent phenomenon. The late- 1960s’ ‘‘ecol- I then asked Len to arrange a meeting with ogy” movement, which probably reached his old tilend. The three of us met at her its height with the observance of Earth Day home in Coconut Grove last summer. in 1970, gave rise to a new popular con- When I spoke with this remarkable wom- sciousness of environmental issues. While an, she shared many insights into her own this consciousness may have waned at times life, the problems facing the Everglades and in succeeding years, there is no doubt that surrounding areas, education, politics, and in the late 1980s, with headlines being made a host of other topics. In tits essay, in honor by oil spills, toxic waste, polluted beaches, of Douglas, I’d like to describe briefly some- disappearing rain forests, and the green- thing of her life and work, present a few ex- house effect, concern for the environment cerpts from our conversation, and discuss has returned to the forefront as an intern- one small way in which ISI@ is helping to ational priority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Collaboration in Everglades Restoration
    The Role of Collaboration in Everglades Restoration A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Kathryn Irene Frank In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning Georgia Institute of Technology August 2009 Copyright © Kathryn Irene Frank 2009 The Role of Collaboration in Everglades Restoration Approved by: Dr. Bruce Stiftel Dr. Michael L. Elliott, Advisor College of Architecture College of Architecture Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Bryan G. Norton Dr. Cheryl K. Contant School of Public Policy Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Georgia Institute of Technology and Dean University of Minnesota Morris Date Approved: August 21, 2009 Dr. C. Ronald Carroll School of Ecology University of Georgia THE ROLE OF COLLABORATION IN EVERGLADES RESTORATION VOLUME I By Kathryn Irene Frank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Michael Elliott, for sharing his wide-ranging wisdom and helping me not get bogged down in the Everglades (data, that is). Dr. Elliott led me to question my assumptions and clarify my thinking, and, most importantly, reminded me of what I had set out to do. I am also indebted to my dissertation committee members, Dr. Cheryl Contant, Dr. Ron Carroll, Dr. Bruce Stiftel, and Dr. Bryan Norton, for lending their superb expertise. Together, the committee encouraged me to reach the dissertation’s full potential. Furthermore, this dissertation would not have been possible without the assistance of many individuals and organizations who provided the Everglades case data. I especially appreciate the governance leaders who generously agreed to be interviewed and welcomed me to observe their collaborative meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: the Everglades to the 1920S Introduction
    Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s Introduction The Everglades is a vast wetland, 40 to 50 miles wide and 100 miles long. Prior to the twentieth century, the Everglades occupied most of the Florida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee.1 Originally about 4,000 square miles in extent, the Everglades included extensive sawgrass marshes dotted with tree islands, wet prairies, sloughs, ponds, rivers, and creeks. Since the 1880s, the Everglades has been drained by canals, compartmentalized behind levees, and partially transformed by agricultural and urban development. Although water depths and flows have been dramatically altered and its spatial extent reduced, the Everglades today remains the only subtropical ecosystem in the United States and one of the most extensive wetland systems in the world. Everglades National Park embraces about one-fourth of the original Everglades plus some ecologically distinct adjacent areas. These adjacent areas include slightly elevated uplands, coastal mangrove forests, and bays, notably Florida Bay. Everglades National Park has been recognized as a World Heritage Site, an International Biosphere Re- serve, and a Wetland of International Importance. In this work, the term Everglades or Everglades Basin will be reserved for the wetland ecosystem (past and present) run- ning between the slightly higher ground to the east and west. The term South Florida will be used for the broader area running from the Kississimee River Valley to the toe of the peninsula.2 Early in the twentieth century, a magazine article noted of the Everglades that “the region is not exactly land, and it is not exactly water.”3 The presence of water covering the land to varying depths through all or a major portion of the year is the defining feature of the Everglades.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: a Narrative of Confict Alanna L
    A Brief History of Lake Okeechobee: A Narrative of Confict Alanna L. Lecher, Ph.D, Lynn University Abstract Lake Okeechobee is Florida’s largest lake, the largest lake in the Southeast United States, and the second largest lake contained entirely within the United States. The history of this inland sea is marked both by natural processes, and more recently human development and intervention. Adventurers can explore this behemoth of a waterway via the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail that enriches it, a part of the Florida National Scenic Trail. This paper synthesizes major natural and human-induced perturbations that shaped the lake and ultimately the trail that encircles it to create a narrative of Florida’s great lake. The story of Lake Okeechobee is a story of battles, frst between the land and sea, then between the lake itself and humankind. For the past few centuries Lake Okeechobee’s natural perturbations in water fow and fooding resisted the control of man, until recently when man triumphed, managing to control the fow of water in and out of the lake. Unfortunately, with this new found control a new bio- ecological threat in the form of harmful algal blooms has emerged, which again threatens the health and livelihood of South Floridians. Currently there are new eforts that seek to restore Lake Okeechobee towards a more natural state in an efort to thwart the blooms. Manuscript It’s a full moon weekend in February and runners lace up their shoes in preparation. They gather in the agricultural town of Clewiston southeast of Lake Okeechobee.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated
    Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Draft Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update and Integrated Environmental Assessment 23 July 2018 Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan DRAFT 23 July 2018 The attached Master Plan for the Okeechobee Waterway Project is in compliance with ER 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES and EP 1130-2-550 Project Operations RECREATION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE POLICIES and no further action is required. Master Plan is approved. Jason A. Kirk, P.E. Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander i Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT [This page intentionally left blank] ii Okeechobee Waterway Project Master Plan Update DRAFT Okeechobee Waterway Master Plan Update PROPOSED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE GLADES, HENDRY, MARTIN, LEE, OKEECHOBEE, AND PALM BEACH COUNTIES 1. PROPOSED ACTION: The proposed Master Plan Update documents current improvements and stewardship of natural resources in the project area. The proposed Master Plan Update includes current recreational features and land use within the project area, while also including the following additions to the Okeechobee Waterway (OWW) Project: a. Conversion of the abandoned campground at Moore Haven West to a Wildlife Management Area (WMA) with access to the Lake Okeechobee Scenic Trail (LOST) and day use area. b. Closure of the W.P. Franklin swim beach, while maintaining the picnic and fishing recreational areas with potential addition of canoe/kayak access. This would entail removing buoys and swimming signs and discontinuing sand renourishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Disston
    HAMILTON DISSTON Hamilton Disston was born August 23, 1844, in Philadelphia. He worked in his father's saw manufacturing plant until he signed up to join the troops fighting in the Civil War. Twice during the early years of fighting, he enlisted, only to be hauled home after his father paid the bounty for another soldier to take his son's place. He eventually accepted his son's wishes and supplied Hamilton and 100 other workers from the saw plant with equipment to form the Disston Volunteers. Hamilton served as a private in the Union Army until the end of the war. Hamilton Disston purchased four million acres of marshland shortly after the Civil War. Included in his purchase was the small trading post of Allendale, which was eventually renamed Kissimmee. Disston wished to drain the area surrounding Kissimmee and deepen the Kissimmee River, so products could be shipped into the Gulf of Mexico and beyond. Many steamboats passed through the area with cargoes of cypress lumber and sugar cane. Disston committed suicide on April 30, 1896, after a disastrous freeze led many families to relocate further south. Disston's land company stopped payment on bonds and returned to Philadelphia. Hamilton Disston Biography by Mary Ellen Wilson and is located in the American National Biography, published by Oxford University Press, 1999. Photo from Ken Milano's archives. Hamilton Disston (23 Aug. 1844-30 Apr. 1896), land developer, was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the son of Henry Disston, an industrialist, and Mary Steelman. At the age of fifteen Disston started as an apprentice in one of the divisions of his father's factory, Keystone Saw, Tool, Steel and File Works, setting a precedent for other family members.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan… Two Years Later
    Danielle Honour, P. E . , D.WRE Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Kimberly Lawrence Reduction Plan… Two Years Later Florida Stormwater Association Annual Conference June 12, 2014 Nutrient Reduction Plan Timeline Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan –2 Years Later Overview of Lake Toho Impairment • November 2010: Placed on Verified List by FDEP – Category 5: Impaired and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) required – Initially impaired for nutrients due to increasing trend of Trophic State Index (TSI) • Osceola County and City of Kissimmee disagreed – Independent analysis showed no Upper Kissimmee Planning Unit TSI Impairment – Ambient nutrient content not related to algae Source: FDEP, 2011 Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan –2 Years Later Overview of Lake Toho Impairment (cont.) • FDEP reconsidered impairment – Agreed more research was needed – Imbalance of flora and fauna due to excessive macrophytes (hydrilla) • December 2011: Nutrient Reduction Plan (NRP) completed • February 2012: Final Listing – Category 4e : Impaired but ongoing restoration activities underway, no TMDL required Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan –2 Years Later NRP Process Timing and Applicability ***Prior to TMDL adoption*** Evaluation • Causative pollutant is questionable or uncertain Strategic Nutrient Monitoring and Reduction Plan Initial Implementation • Highly managed or Assessment variable systems Final • Marginal impairment ‐ Impairment Listing & fluctuates over time Adoption Lake Tohopekaliga Nutrient Reduction Plan –2 Years Later The TMDL Process
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Assessment Model (WAM) Calibration and Sensitivity And
    Watershed Assessment Model (WAM) : Calibration and Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses Task 1.1: WAM Simulated Existing Conditions Characterization Report and Model Validation Report - Final Soil and Water Engineering Technology, Inc. September 4, 2015 FDACS Contract No. 022589 Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Background .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2 The Watershed Assessment Model......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Model Approach .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Source Cell Modeling .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 GLEAMS .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]