Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 35 November 12, 2020 Opus 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 35 November 12, 2020 Opus 2 Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 35 November 12, 2020 Opus 2 - Official Court Reporters Phone: +44 (0)20 3008 5900 Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.opus2.com November 12, 2020 Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 35 1 Thursday, 12 November 2020 1 that JSaRC did? 2 (9.30 am) 2 A. It would work with, in the crowded places example, with 3 (Delay in proceedings) 3 solution providers to provide technologies and test 4 (9.42 am) 4 technologies that would make public places more secure, 5 MR GREANEY: Good morning, sir. The gentleman in the 5 screening technologies for going into events and arenas, 6 witness box is Shaun Hipgrave, and I’ll begin by asking 6 et cetera. 7 that he be sworn, please. 7 Q. As we’re going to hear during your period as director of 8 MR SHAUN HIPGRAVE (affirmed) 8 Protect and Prepare at OSCT, you’ve been heavily 9 SIR JOHN SAUNDERS: Mr Hipgrave, this is the second time 9 involved in dealing with what we used to call crowded 10 you have come. I’m very sorry you came the last time 10 places or crowded spaces, now called publicly accessible 11 and we couldn’t deal with your evidence. 11 locations . When you were at JSaRC were you also 12 Mr Greaney, I’m also asked that the next witness 12 concerned with dealing with that kind of situation? 13 should watch, hear or be in the room for this evidence, 13 A. Parts of my work were, yes. 14 whichever... 14 Q. Prior to joining the Home Office, were you first ofall 15 (Pause) 15 a soldier for 10 years in the British Army? 16 Thank you very much. Otherwise it saves repetition 16 A. Yes. 17 of things which one witness deals with to go over again. 17 Q. Then a police officer for 13 years? 18 MR GREANEY: It does, sir, and it is to be encouraged, we 18 A. Yes. 19 quite agree. 19 Q. And then I think you spent 13 years in the private 20 SIR JOHN SAUNDERS: Unless anyone has any problem with that? 20 sector working predominantly with law enforcement 21 Thank you. 21 agencies in the field of digital forensics ? 22 Questions from MR GREANEY 22 A. That’s correct, yes. 23 MR GREANEY: Mr Hipgrave, would you begin by telling us your 23 Q. I’m next going to ask you to deal with in overview the 24 full name? 24 UK’s counter−terrorism strategy known as CONTEST. 25 A. Shaun Andrew Hipgrave. 25 Sir , if it ’s helpful I ’m at paragraph 9 of the 1 3 1 Q. Are you the director of Protect and Prepare in the 1 updated witness statement of Mr Hipgrave. 2 Office for Security and Counter−terrorism? 2 In dealing with that general topic, we’ ll address, 3 A. I am. 3 first of all , the aims of and responsibility for 4 Q. So, The OSCT? 4 CONTEST. Is the United Kingdom’s counter−terrorism 5 A. Yes. 5 strategy known as CONTEST? 6 Q. Does the OSCT form part of the Home Office? 6 A. It is , yes. 7 A. It does, yes. 7 Q. Does that set out how the government will seek to 8 Q. Have you held that post since June 2019? 8 continue to reduce the risk to the United Kingdom and 9 A. That’s correct, yes. 9 its citizens and interests overseas from terrorism? 10 Q. Prior to that, were you the head of the Joint Security 10 A. It does, yes. 11 and Resilience Centre? 11 Q. Is CONTEST split into four strands? 12 A. Yes. 12 A. It is , yes. 13 Q. Is that known as JSaRC? 13 Q. What are those four strands, please? 14 A. Yes. 14 A. Prevent, Pursue, Protect and Prepare. 15 Q. Which I think itself formed part of the OSCT? 15 Q. Is the purpose of Prevent and Pursue to reduce the 16 A. That’s correct, yes. 16 threats that we as a community face? 17 Q. And had you held that role for 2 years? 17 A. That’s correct, yes. 18 A. Yes. 18 Q. Is the purpose of Protect and Prepare to reduce our 19 Q. Is JSaRC a unit that was established to help the 19 vulnerabilities ? 20 government and private security sector suppliers to work 20 A. Protect to reduce our vulnerabilities , and Prepare in 21 more closely together to achieve better security 21 response to an attack. 22 outcomes? 22 Q. Should we view those strands in isolation or in some 23 A. It was, yes, and the private sector in its entirety , 23 different way? 24 yes. 24 A. No, they are integrated as a system and whilst we treat 25 Q. Can you give us an idea of the type of work therefore 25 them in the policy function separately , at a system 2 4 Opus 2 [email protected] Official Court Reporters +44 (0)20 3008 5900 November 12, 2020 Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 35 1 level they all work together to overall reduce the 1 in a few sentences. 2 threat of terrorism. 2 A. So the Prepare strand is about preparing for a response 3 Q. As you’re aware and as the core participants are aware, 3 to a terrorist attack, and in my area it does include 4 you are going to give your evidence in at least two 4 the attack response from the emergency services to 5 parts, and potentially more than two parts. Today 5 a terrorist attack, the support for victims from 6 you’re going to deal principally with the Protect strand 6 a terrorist attack as well , and counter−terrorism, 7 of CONTEST, and even more specifically with publicly 7 national counter−terrorism exercising in preparing how 8 accessible locations . 8 to deal with a terrorist attack. 9 A. Yes. 9 Q. I said you were only going to deal with Protect today, 10 Q. Before we get to that, what I’d like you to do is please 10 but you are in fact going to help us with 11 explain in simple terms, or high−level terms, however 11 counter−terrorism exercising as well because that is one 12 one wishes to put it , each of the four strands. So just 12 of the issues that has arisen in the course of the oral 13 really in a few sentences, first of all , how would you 13 evidence hearings so far , so we’ ll cover that as well , 14 describe Prevent, please? 14 albeit that will not take very long. 15 A. So Prevent is the area of CONTEST where we prevent 15 In relation to each of those four strands, does the 16 people from being radicalised and entering into 16 OSCT lead? 17 terrorism. We have a programme that has different 17 A. Yes. 18 aspects to it that will prevent people from getting 18 Q. What does that mean, leading those strands? 19 involved in terrorism. 19 A. We have a director−general for OSCT, who is not only the 20 Q. So it’s about the identification of those who are 20 system leader for OSCT but also the senior responsible 21 vulnerable to radicalisation ? 21 owner for counter−terrorism across the UK Government, 22 A. Yes. 22 and we have a series of forums, strategic forums, where 23 Q. And even those who are in the process of radicalisation 23 we bring the system together to ensure that we have 24 and trying to prevent that happening or getting worse? 24 a system response for counter−terrorism so that 25 A. Yes. 25 we aren’t being treated in our separate pillars , we are 5 7 1 Q. Next, in a few sentences, Pursue, please. 1 working with our operational partners to ensure we have 2 A. Pursue will work as a system with operational partners 2 a systematic approach to countering terrorism. 3 who identify and investigate terrorism where it happens, 3 Q. So it’s all about having an organised, systematic and 4 so it ’s essentially an investigation and intelligence 4 coordinated approach across government to 5 function. 5 counter−terrorism? 6 Q. Would it include, for example, Counter−terrorism 6 A. Yes, and there are various meetings and forums that 7 Policing? 7 allow that to happen and, flowing down from the top, 8 A. Yes. 8 there’s the National Security Council that the 9 Q. Next, in a few sentences, although you’re going to deal 9 Prime Minister chairs, right down to the National 10 with the detail of at least some of this, Protect, 10 Security Strategic and Implementation Group 11 please. 11 Counter−terrorism, that DG OSCT chairs, and that flows 12 A. Protect is where we can identify vulnerabilities in 12 down to all the four P boards. So what you see is the 13 certain areas, not just publicly accessible locations , 13 system leadership from the top is flowing down to policy 14 with people as well . It also has responsibility for 14 at the P board level. 15 protecting VIPs and identifying those vulnerabilities 15 Q. What I am going to do, in fact ion a few moments, before 16 and mitigating against them. 16 we get to Protect, is just to ask you to help us with 17 Q. Although we’re going to be dealing with publicly 17 what the structure of government is in relation to 18 accessible locations today, does addressing the threat 18 counter−terrorism.
Recommended publications
  • Full Reservoir Level of 630 Feet
    y k y cm SERO TESTS IN CITY SPIKE IN CHILD LABOUR KAMALA ‘NOT COMPETENT’ About 1,200 samples have been collected Survey finds child labour has increased by a Kamala Harris is “not competent” to be by the RMRC in 2nd round of sero sizeable 105 per cent during lockdown president, says US President Donald Trump tests in 2 days DOWNTOWN | P3 period in West Bengal TWO STATES | P7 INTERNATIONAL | P10 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 149 | www.orissapost.com BHUBANESWAR | SUNDAY, AUGUST 30 | 2020 12 PAGES + SUNDAY POST | `4.00 IRREGULAR by MANJUL NO LOCAL LOCKDOWNS UNLOCK 4.0: States can’t impose any local lockdown outside the containment zones without prior consultation with the Centre AGENCIES Social, aca- The Ministry added that there shall demic, sports, en- be no restriction on inter-state and AMIT SHAH RECOVERS Instead of paying us one lakh to New Delhi, August 29: The Union tertainment, cul- intra-state movement of persons and NEW DELHI: Union Mahanadi tribunal asks publish your book, pay us two lakh to Home Ministry Saturday issued the tural, religious, goods, and no separate permission/ e- Home Minister reject it. It will give you better publicity Unlock 4.0 guidelines under which the political functions permit will be re- Amit Shah has state governments shall not impose and other con- quired for recovered and will states to submit data to any local lockdown outside the con- gregations such move- be discharged tainment zones without prior consul- will be per- ments dur- from the All India Black Panther actor tation with the Central government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Migration
    The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics ENTERPRISE AND VALUES SERIES The Challenges of Migration Andrei Rogobete The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics We are a think tank based in Oxford that seeks to promote an enterprise, market economy built on ethical foundations. Copyright © 2018, Andrei Rogobete We undertake research on the interface of Christian theology, economics Copyright © 2018: this edition, The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and and business. Ethics Our aim is to argue the case for an economy that generates wealth, The moral rights of the author have been asserted. employment, innovation and enterprise within a framework of calling, All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be integrity, values and ethical behaviour, leading to the transformation of the reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written business enterprise and contributing to the relief of poverty. permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a We publish a range of material, hold events and conferences, undertake book review. research projects and speak and teach in the areas with which we are Scripture quotations are from New Revised Standard Version Bible: concerned. Anglicized Edition, copyright © 1989, 1995 National Council of the We are independent and a registered charity entirely dependent on Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. donations for our work. All rights reserved. Our website is www.theceme.org. For further information please
    [Show full text]
  • APR 2016 Part C.Pdf
    Page | 1 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – April 2016 www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Page | 2 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – April 2016 After Brussels, Europe's intelligence woes revealed Source:http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/22/brussels-attack-why-europe-must-increase-terror- intelligence.html Mar 23 – Europe must improve the regional Rudd's comments are at the crux of a hot- sharing of intelligence to successfully button discourse about the encroachment on combat the rise of homegrown militants, civil liberties should governments ramp up policy experts told CNBC a day after deadly surveillance and detainment tactics in the explosions hit Brussels. global war on terror. Global terrorist organization ISIS claimed Rudd believes it's a necessary cost to bear. responsibility for Tuesday's attacks that killed "This is not a normal set of circumstances, at least 31 people, the latest episode in the we've got to give our men and women in group's campaign of large-scale violence on uniform and in the intelligence services the the international stage. powers necessary to deal with this. This is no Recent offensives in Paris and Jakarta indicate criticism of the Belgian government but a wake- ISIS is increasingly relying on local up call to all of us who wrestle with this fundamentalists, typically trained in ISIS debate." strongholds within the Middle East, to execute Others agree that European officials must suicide bombings and shootings in busy direct more investment to counter-terrorism, metropolitan areas. despite strained finances for most countries in "The key question here is closing the the region. intelligence gap," said Kevin Rudd, former The fact that the perpetrator of December's Prime Minister of Australia and president of the Paris attacks was caught in Belgium four Asia Society Policy Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Radicalization in the Uk: Index of Radicalization
    ISLAMIC RADICALIZATION IN THE UK: INDEX OF RADICALIZATION Anna Wojtowicz, (Research Assistant, ICT) Sumer 2012 ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to analyze the process of radicalization amongst British Muslims in the United Kingdom. It begins with a review of the Muslim population, demographics and community structure. Further presenting several internal and external indicators that influenced and led to radicalization of Muslim youth in Britain. The paper concludes that there is no one certainty for what causes radicalization amongst Muslims in United Kingdom. However, it is certain that Islamic radicalization and the emergence of a homegrown threat is a growing trend that jeopardizes the countries security, peace and stability. Radicalization in the United Kingdom is an existing concern that needs to be addressed and acted upon immediately. Misunderstanding or underestimating the threat may lead to further and long term consequences. * The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT). 2 I. Introduction 4 II. Background 5 History of the Muslim Community in the United Kingdom 5 Population 7 Geographical Concentration of Muslims 8 Ethnic Background 10 Age Estimate 11 Occupation and Socio-Economic Conditions 11 Religious and Cultural Aspects 13 Multiculturalism 17 Islamophobia 20 Converts 21 Case Studies –London, Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds, Leicester 22 III. Organizations 28 Organizations within the United Kingdom 28 Mosques, Koranic Schools and Islamic Centers 34 Student Groups 40 Islamic Websites and TV 43 IV. Radicalization in Britain 43 Theoretical Background and Causes of Radicalization 43 Recruitment and Radicalization: Overlook 47 Radicalization Process 49 Forms of Financing 51 Radical Groups and Movements in the UK 53 Influential Leaders in the UK 60 Inspiration and Influence from Abroad 67 Sunni 67 Shia 70 3 V.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Armed Forces Personnel and the Legal Framework for Future Operations
    House of Commons Defence Committee UK Armed Forces Personnel and the Legal Framework for Future Operations Twelfth Report of Session 2013–14 Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 March 2013 HC 931 Published on 2 April 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chair) Mr Julian Brazier MP (Conservative, Canterbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co-op, Barrow and Furness) The following Members were also members of the Committee during this inquiry. Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon 2020 SME Instrument Phase 1 Beneficiaries
    Horizon 2020 SME Instrument Updated in June 2017 Phase 1 beneficiaries Call Deadline Country City Beneficiary Website Proposal Acronym Long name Date Topic May 2017 cut off Small business innovation Novel, automated charging infrastructure for Austria Graz easE-Link GmbH http://ease-link.com/ MATRIX CHARGING 03/05/2017 research for Transport and electric vehicles Smart Cities Mobility Small business innovation Austria Linz My Esel GmbH MI-BIKE World's Most Individual Bikes and e-bikes 03/05/2017 research for Transport and Smart Cities Mobility Boosting the potential of small Metallurgical patented Process Transforming businesses in the areas of Austria Leoben UrbanGold GmbH www.urbangold.at METALLICA Residues from the Electronic Industry into 03/05/2017 climate action, environment, Valuable Precious Metals resource efficiency and raw Accelerating market Pridiktiv - Exploring European expansion introduction of ICT solutions Belgium Roosdaal Pridiktiv NV www.pridiktiv.care PRIDIKTIV 03/05/2017 through 4 pilot studies for Health, Well-Being and Ageing Well Full scale demonstration of an Innovative Small business innovation Denmark Hedehusene BBHS A/S www.bbhs.dk IBiS solution for Baggage Handling Systems at 03/05/2017 research for Transport and airports (IBiS) Smart Cities Mobility Accelerating the uptake of A disruptive air filtration system for cleaning- nanotechnologies advanced Denmark Herning MULTI AIR Aps http://www.multiair.dk JetConveyor free operation in dust-intensive process 03/05/2017 materials or advanced industrial environments
    [Show full text]
  • Report on NW Europe Regional Workshop
    D7.1 – Report on NW Europe regional workshop Grant agreement number: 605142 Due date of deliverable: 2015-02-28 Start date of the project: 2014-06-01 Actual submission date: 2015-02-28 Duration: 18 months Deliverable approved: Y Lead Beneficiary: Loughborough University (LUNI) Contributing beneficiaries: The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS) and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UCSC) Authors: Ksenia Chmutina, Lee Bosher, Andrew Dainty (LUNI), with Joshua Polchar, Tim Sweijs (HCSS), Barbara Lucini, Marco Lombardi (UCSC) Keywords: North-West Europe; Concepts of Security, EvoCS Dissemination level: PU Release Number Release date Released by 0.9 24.02.2015 Lee Bosher 1.0 25.02.2015 Joachim Burbiel EvoCS Deliverable 7.1 Report on the NW Europe Case Study Workshop Executive Summary This report constitutes Deliverable 7.1 of the FP7 Security Programme project ‘Evolving Concepts of Security’ (EvoCS, Grant Agreement). This report on Work Package 7 (WP7) of the EvoCS project is chronologically the first deliverable of the work package. The purpose of this deliverable is to report on the North-West Europe (NWE) Case Study Workshop, which took place on the 29th of January 2015 at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London. The insights emerging from this regional workshop have provided a sense of the complex interconnectivity of the debates that have shaped / are shaping the security discourse, as well as the disconnected dimensions that could be considered under this nebulous and politically charged term. The workshop allowed for corroboration and/or re-calibration of the EvoCS coding analysis (see Deliverable 3.1), informing the coding with expert opinion from a cross-section of policy makers, academics and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Ordinated By
    Co-ordinated by: Last updated: February 2019 Julia Zelvenska Head of Legal Support and Litigation European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Rue Royale 146, 1st floor 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 (2) 212 0814 Fax: +32 (2) 514 5922 E-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS A. Introduction Preface i European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) ii Introduction to ELENA iii B. Countries Austria 1 Belgium 8 Bosnia-Herzegovina 13 Bulgaria 15 Croatia 19 Cyprus 23 Czech Republic 26 Denmark 28 Estonia 32 Finland 34 France 37 Germany 47 Greece 57 Hungary 62 Iceland 65 Ireland 68 Italy 73 Latvia 87 Lithuania 89 Luxembourg 91 Malta 94 The Netherlands 97 Norway 102 Poland 108 Portugal 111 Romania 114 Russia 117 Serbia 121 Slovak Republic 125 Slovenia 128 Spain 133 Sweden 145 Switzerland 153 Turkey 156 Ukraine 159 United Kingdom 161 C. UNHCR Offices 165 D. Format of the country chapters In general the country chapters are structured as follows: I. ELENA NATIONAL COORDINATOR Name and address of the person who serves as the contact and coordination person for the ELENA network for the country in question. II. NATIONAL UMBRELLA ORGANISATIONS / REFUGEE COUNCILS National umbrella organisations of voluntary agencies, counselling offices and lawyers who exercise a coordinating function. III. ORGANISATIONS SUPPORTING ASYLUM SEEKERS Voluntary agencies, counselling centres and other humanitarian organisations dealing with counselling, housing, financial support, integration and other social problems of asylum seekers during the asylum procedure. IV. ORGANISATIONS PROVIDING ADVICE TO ASYLUM SEEKERS Non-Governmental Organisations and voluntary agencies providing legal advice and assistance to asylum seekers.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Grown Terrorism and Islamist Radicalisation in Europe
    Home grown terrorism and Islamist radi- calisation in Europe From conversion to terrorism An assessment of the factors influencing violent Islamist extremism and suggestions for counter radicalisation measures Det projekt, der beskrives i denne rapport, er støttet økonomisk af Justitsministeriets Forskningspulje. Projektets gennemførelse og resultater er alene forfatternes ansvar. De vurderinger og synspunkter, der fremsættes i rapporten, er forfatternes egne og deles ikke nødvendigvis af Justitsministeriet. Research report funded by the Danish Ministry of Justice (December 2007) By Tomas Precht Table of Contents ________________________________________________________________________________ Tables and figures 3 Foreword 4 Summary 5 1. Introduction 9 2. Research agenda and definitions 13 3. The threat from home grown terrorism 18 4. Home grown terrorism as a historical phenomenon 23 5. The roots of radical Islamist ideology 27 6. The radicalisation process – dynamics and catalysts 32 7. Motivational factors 38 8. Background factors 42 • Muslim identity crisis 42 • Experience of discrimination and relative deprivation factors 43 • Living environment and peers (segregation and parallel society) 45 • Relative lack of Muslim public debate on Islamist terrorism in Europe 46 9. Trigger factors 50 • Foreign policy and single provocative incidents 50 • The myth of Jihad and desire for activism 52 • Presence of a charismatic person or spiritual advisor 53 10. Opportunity factors 56 • The Internet 56 • Satellite channels 59 • Prisons 60 • The Mosque 63 • School, university, youth clubs or workplace and sporting activities 66 11. Advanced radicalisation: Overseas travel, training and planning 68 12. Prevention and counter radicalisation strategies 71 • Societal measures 73 • Counter ideology 74 • Policing and community intelligence 77 • Public diplomacy and foreign policy 79 13.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-005-01.Pdf
    NOVEMBER 2020 Behavioural-Focused Protective Security Programmes FULL REPORT Dr Simon Copeland, Lancaster University Dr Sarah Marsden, Lancaster University This report is one of a series exploring Knowledge Management Across the Four Counter- Terrorism ‘Ps’. The project looks at areas of policy and practice that fall within the four pillars of CONTEST. For more information visit: www.crestresearch.ac.uk/projects/the-four-counter-terrorism-ps With grateful thanks to Dr Julia Pearce for his contribution as expert academic advisor. This research was funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats - an independent Centre commissioned by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1) and which is funded in part by the UK Security and intelligence agencies and Home Office. www.crestresearch.ac.uk ©2020 CREST Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence.www.crestresearch.ac.uk/copyright TABLE OF CONTENTS KEY POINTS ..............................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................5 MOTIVATIONS AND BARRIERS TO PUBLIC REPORTING ............................................................6 1. INTERPRETING WHAT INFLUENCES PUBLIC REPORTING FOLLOWING A TERRORIST ATTACK ...............................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Netherlands: Central Databases Challenged by Kees Hudig
    statewatch monitoring the state and civil liberties in Europe Volume 20 no 1 Netherlands: Central databases challenged by Kees Hudig The creation of a database containing the fingerprints of all Dutch citizens is being legally challenged by a group of people supported by the Privacy First organisation. On 6 May 2010 a civil challenge was lodged with the Dutch official complaint involving one or more voters and 62% of High Court in The Hague. A spokesperson for Privacy First said municipalities had official complaints filed. Vrijbit estimates that that the action was taken after a complaint by the privacy around 650,000 voters were unable to vote because of a lack of protection organisation, Stichting Vrijbit, at the European Court valid identification papers [1]. of Human Rights was rejected on the grounds that it should Aaron Boudewijn, a 24-year old student from Utrecht, was initially be heard at the national level. refused a passport because he would not be fingerprinted. He took his case to the local court and launched a campaign, urging The National fingerprint database others to join him. [2] Boudewijn said that he was not opposed On 9 June 2009, the Upper House of the Dutch parliament to the registering of his fingerprints on the passport’s RFID chip (Eerste Kamer) passed a law introducing biometric passports but he refused to accept their storage in a central database, containing an RFID-microchip holding digital information on its arguing that it was unnecessary and that the data was poorly owner (see Statewatch Vol. 19 no 3). European regulation protected against leaks, identity theft and access by third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • JAN 2017 Part B.Pdf
    Page | 1 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – January 2017 www.cbrne-terrorism-newsletter.com Page | 2 CBRNE-TERRORISM NEWSLETTER – January 2017 Lost Nukes Present Opportunities for Terrorists Source: http://i-hls.com/2017/01/lost-nukes-present-opportunities-terrorists/ Jan 01 – Could Islamist terrorists get a hold of a nuclear bomb? Dozens of nuclear warheads have gone missing during the 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s – with many confirmed the loss of at least eight atomic bombs – with a combined explosive force 2,200 times the Hiroshima bomb. According to The Sun, the Russians have never disclosed their missing weapons. However, according to the Berlin Information Centre for Transatlantic Security up to 50 nukes have been lost across the world since the 1950s. Most of these highly dangerous weapons are still lying on the ocean floor after military planes and subs sank without a trace. Experts claim that while they would probably be no use as weapons they could easily be salvaged, and the uranium would be used to build a “dirty” bomb (a weapon that combines radioactive material with conventional explosives). ISIS terror fanatics, who have been working to bolster their ranks with a team of jihadi scientists capable of creating a dirty bomb, have already launched chemical attacks. According to security service officials, finding a missing nuke would be a huge achievement for any terror group. Now, experts say the jihadis who want to develop nuclear weapons are the biggest threat to Europe since the end of the cold war. Moshe Kantor, head of the Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe, warned: “ISIS has already carried out numerous chemical weapons attacks in Syria.
    [Show full text]