Maryland's Wild Acres
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project. -
Nomenclature – What's in a Name?
xx Nomenclature – what’s in a name? Read Payne 2016 xx Nomenclature – what’s in a name? Cypripedium reginae Cypripedium hirsutum Cypripedium spectabile showy lady’s-slipper queen lady’s-slipper Nomenclature - Using Names Two of the goals for Systematics: 1. Identify and name species 2. Classify or place the species in groups Plantae Kingdom Magnoliophyta Phylum Liliopsida Class Asparagales Order classification Orchidaceae Family Cypripedium Genus Hierarchical Cypripedium acaule Species Cypripedium acaule Stemless lady slipper Common Names Advantages? • descriptive, colorful • easy to remember • only names for most people Disadvantages? • one species = many common names Moccasin flower Pink lady’s slipper Stemless lady’s slipper Common Names • 15 names in English • 44 in French • 81 in Dutch • 105 in German 245 common names but only 1 Latin name Nymphaea alba L. European white waterlily Common Names Advantages? • descriptive, colorful • easy to remember • only names for most people Disadvantages? • one species = many common names • one common name = 2+ species Chamerion — evening Erectites — e.g., fireweed primrose family aster family Common Names Advantages? • descriptive, colorful • easy to remember • only names for most people Disadvantages? • one species = many common names • one common name = 2+ species Lythrum — e.g., loosestrife loosestrife family Lysimachia — primrose family Common Names Advantages? • descriptive, colorful • easy to remember • only names for most people Disadvantages? • one species = many common names • one name -
Wildflowers and Ferns Along the Acton Arboretum Wildflower Trail and in Other Gardens FERNS (Including Those Occurring Naturally
Wildflowers and Ferns Along the Acton Arboretum Wildflower Trail and In Other Gardens Updated to June 9, 2018 by Bruce Carley FERNS (including those occurring naturally along the trail and both boardwalks) Royal fern (Osmunda regalis): occasional along south boardwalk, at edge of hosta garden, and elsewhere at Arboretum Cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea): naturally occurring in quantity along south boardwalk Interrupted fern (Osmunda claytoniana): naturally occurring in quantity along south boardwalk Maidenhair fern (Adiantum pedatum): several healthy clumps along boardwalk and trail, a few in other Arboretum gardens Common polypody (Polypodium virginianum): 1 small clump near north boardwalk Hayscented fern (Dennstaedtia punctilobula): aggressive species; naturally occurring along north boardwalk Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum): occasional along wildflower trail; common elsewhere at Arboretum Broad beech fern (Phegopteris hexagonoptera): up to a few near north boardwalk; also in rhododendron and hosta gardens New York fern (Thelypteris noveboracensis): naturally occurring and abundant along wildflower trail * Ostrich fern (Matteuccia pensylvanica): well-established along many parts of wildflower trail; fiddleheads edible Sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis): naturally occurring and abundant along south boardwalk Lady fern (Athyrium filix-foemina): moderately present along wildflower trail and south boardwalk Common woodfern (Dryopteris spinulosa): 1 patch of 4 plants along south boardwalk; occasional elsewhere at Arboretum Marginal -
Nomenclature – What's in a Name?
xx xx Nomenclature – Nomenclature – what’s in a name? what’s in a name? Cypripedium reginae Read Payne 2016 Cypripedium hirsutum Cypripedium spectabile showy lady’s-slipper queen lady’s-slipper Nomenclature - Using Names Common Names Two of the goals for Systematics: Advantages? 1. Identify and name species • descriptive, colorful 2. Classify or place the species in groups • easy to remember • only names for most people Plantae Kingdom Magnoliophyta Phylum Disadvantages? Liliopsida Class • one species = many common names Asparagales Order classification Orchidaceae Family Moccasin flower Pink lady’s slipper Cypripedium Genus Cypripedium acaule Species Hierarchical Cypripedium acaule Stemless lady’s slipper Stemless lady slipper 1 Common Names Common Names Advantages? • 15 names in English • descriptive, colorful • 44 in French • easy to remember • 81 in Dutch • only names for most people • 105 in German Disadvantages? • one species = many common 245 common names but names only 1 Latin name • one common name = 2+ species Chamerion — evening Erectites — Nymphaea alba L. e.g., fireweed primrose family aster family European white waterlily Common Names Common Names Advantages? Advantages? • descriptive, colorful • descriptive, colorful • easy to remember • easy to remember • only names for most people • only names for most people Disadvantages? Disadvantages? • one species = many common • one species = many common names names • one common name = 2+ • one name = 2+ species species • names can be confusing Lythrum — e.g., loosestrife loosestrife -
Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park: 2014 Data Summary
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 ON THIS PAGE Tiny, bright yellow blossoms of Hypoxis hirsuta grace the forest floor at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network. ON THE COVER Spiraling compound leaf of green dragon (Arisaema dracontium) at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 Sarah Corbett Heath1 and Michael W. Byrne2 1National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, GA 31558 2National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Drive Athens, GA 30605 May 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. -
Fatima Otavina De Souza MS.Pdf
Fotos da capa, da esquerda para a direita: 1. Baccharis trimera (Less.) DC. 2. Emilia fosbergii Nicolson 3. Mikania involucrata Hook. & Arn. 4. Mikania cordifolia (L.f.) Willd. 5. Vernonia scorpioides (Lam.) Pers. 6. Baccharis singularis (Vell.) G.M. Barroso 7. Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski 8. Barrosoa betoniciformis (DC.) R.M. King & H. Rob. 9. Crepis japonica (L.) Benth. 10. Piptocarpha leprosa (Less.) Baker 11. Centratherum punctatum Cass. 12. Achyrocline satureoides (Lam.) DC. Fotos: 1, 8-9: R.S. Bianchini; 2, 6, 12: F.O. Souza, 3-5: S.E. Martins, 7: A.L. Santos, 10-11: R.P. Romanini. Layout da capa: Anderson Luiz dos Santos FÁTIMA OTAVINA DE SOUZA ASTERACEAE NO PARQUE ESTADUAL DA ILHA DO CARDOSO, CANANÉIA, SP. Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Botânica da Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, como parte dos requisitos exigidos para obtenção do título de MESTRE em BIODIVERSIDADE VEGETAL e MEIO AMBIENTE, na Área de concentração de Plantas Vasculares em análises ambientais. Orientadora: Dra. Rosangela Simão Bianchini SÃO PAULO 2007 Ficha Catalográfica elaborada pela Seção de Biblioteca do Instituto de Botânica Souza, Fátima Otavina de S729a Asteraceae no Parque Estadual da Ilha do Cardoso, Cananéia , SP/ Fátima Otavina de Souza -- São Paulo, 2007. 147p. il. Dissertação (Mestrado) -- Instituto de Botânica da Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente, 2007 Bibliografia. 1. Asteraceae. 2. Mata Atlântica. 3. Florística. I. Título CDU 582.998 Comissão Julgadora: Lucia Rossi Roberto Lourenço Esteves Prof(a). Dr(a). Prof(a). Dr(a). Dra. Rosangela Simão Bianchini Orientadora AGRADECIMENTOS Quero expressar os meus mais sinceros agradecimentos a todos que contribuíram de alguma forma para que este trabalho tenha sido desenvolvido e meu objetivo alcançado, em especial: Ao Instituto de Botânica, na pessoa do ex-diretor geral Dr. -
Native Plants of Maryland: What, When and Where
Home and Garden Mimeo HG#120 3/2005 Native Plants of Maryland: What, When and Where Eupatorium Cercis fistulosum canadensis Monarda didyma Rhododendron periclymenoides Tradescantia virginiana Tiarella cordifolia Rudbeckia hirta Lobelia cardinalis TABLE OF CONTENTS What are Native Plants ....................................... 2 Plant listings by preferred conditions .......... 15-20 Physiographic Map of Maryland ........................ 2 Plant Common Name Index ......................... 20-22 Invasive Non Natives .......................................... 3 References ........................................................ 23 Plant listing by type and preferences ............ 4-14 Glossary ............................................................ 23 Native Plants for Maryland INTRODUCTION WHAT ARE GROWTH CONDITIONS FOR NATIVE PLANTS? This guide is intended to help in the selection of native plants for habitat restoration, Maryland is host to a wide variety of native plants. This is due to the diversity of geo- critical area buffer management and natural landscaping projects. All of these plants graphical and climatic conditions. The state is divided into three physiographic regions are native to Maryland. Each section lists plants in alphabetical order by their Latin coastal, piedmont and mountain. You may use the map below to determine your region. names. Common names are included and are cross-referenced in the index. Growth conditions and plant characteristics are also included. State of Maryland Physiographic Regions WHAT ARE NATIVE PLANTS? A native plant is a species that originates or occurs naturally in a particular region. As our local habitat is disturbed by development, non-native and invasive plants change the character of our landscapes. Although many naturalized but introduced plants occur in most regions, the native plants listed are species that existed in Maryland when the European settlers arrived, or they are cultivars of these species. -
Genetic Diversity of Vernonia As Revealed by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Markers
Provided for non-commercial research and education use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. Vol. 9 No.1 (2018) Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences is the official English language journal of the Egyptian Society for Biological Sciences, Department of Entomology, Faculty of Sciences Ain Shams University. The Botany Journal publishes original research papers and reviews from any botanical discipline or from directly allied fields in ecology, behavioral biology, physiology, biochemistry, development, genetics, systematic, morphology, evolution, control of herbs, arachnids, and general botany.. www.eajbs.eg.net Citation :Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci. (H. Botany) Vol.9(1)pp27-38(2018) Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci., 9(1):27 - 38 (2018) Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences H. Botany ISSN 2090-3812 www.eajbs.eg.net Genetic Diversity of Vernonia as Revealed By Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Markers Nwakanma, N.M.C1,2., Oboh, B.O2., Adekoya, K.O2. and Ogunkanmi, L.A2. 1-Department of Biological Science, School of Science, Yaba College of Technology, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria. 2-Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, University of Lagos, Akoka, Nigeria. E,Mail : [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History Vernonia Schreb. is a genus in the family Asteraceae. It has over Received: 25/3/2018 1000 species which may be trees, shrubs, woody climbers or herbs. Accepted: 27/4/2018 Some of the species are economically important as sources of food and _________________ herbal medicine as well as for industrial purposes. This study was Keywords: carried out to assess the genetic diversity of Vernonia species in Genetic diversity, Nigeria. -
Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at The
West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey Documents 2016 Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at the Gordon Natural Area (West Chester University, PA) - Version 10 Nur Ritter West Chester University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/gna_bps_series Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Ritter, N. (2016). Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at the Gordon Natural Area (West Chester University, PA) - Version 10. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/gna_bps_series/4 This Dataset is brought to you for free and open access by the Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gordon Natural Area Baseline Plant Survey Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Species Observed at the Gordon Natural Area (West Chester University, PA) - Version X Key to Sources (see Literature Cited for complete references) E&H 2010: Ebert, J. and J. Holt. 2010; E&M 2012: Ebert J. and K. McMillin. 2012; H 1984: Hertel, G. D. 2008, sampling from 1984; H 2004: Hertel, G. D. 2008, sampling from 2004; H&E 2007: Holt, J. and J. Ebert. 2007; O 1973: Overlease, W. 1973; O&O 2011: Overlease, W. and E. Overlease. 2011; T 2007: Turner, et al. 2007. Species Data Species names follow the nomenclature in USDA PLANTS, with the exception of State-listed taxa (which follow the nomenclature of the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program). -
Generic and Subtribal Classification of American Vernonieae
SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 89 Generic and Subtribal Classification of American Vernonieae Harold Robinson Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, D.C. 1999 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold. Generic and Subtribal Classification of American Vernonieae. Smithso- niun Contributions to Botany, number 89, 116 pages, 1999.-The Vernonieae in America is herein defined to exclude the Liabeae and Pseudostifftiu (Moquinieae), and to include elements sometimes placed in the Heliantheae (Trichospiru) or Lactuceae (Stokesiu). Pollen, style bases, raphids, inflorescence form, involucre, anther appendage, and chemistry are some characters used in the reclassification. Tables 1-12 indicate the distribution of these characteristics in most American genera. Vernoniu s.s., with type A pollen, is typified by K noveborucensis (L.) and occurs in the Bahamas, eastern North America, south to central Mexico and has two spe- cies in temperate South America. All other species previously placed in Vernoniu need to be removed from the genus, a process that is nearly complete for neotropical species. Most Amer- ican Vernonieae seem to form a single related subgroup in the tribe. Subtribes included in the related subgroup are the Lychnophorinae (x = 15, 17, 18) and Centratherinae (x = 16) with type A pollen and hroheliangolides; Piptocarphinae (x= 17) with type A pollen, deciduous inner involucre, and sometimes opposite leaves; Vernoniinae (x = 17), many with glanduliferous anther appendages (including the Lepiduplou complex mostly with echinolophate pollen); and the newly proposed subtribes Sipolisiinae with type A pollen, armed receptacles, and carbon- ized achenes; Chrestinae with echinolophate pollen; and Leiboldiinae (x= 19) with type A pol- len, large heads, and a modified callus at the top of the achene. -
Vascular Plant Inventory
VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR CARL SANDBURG HOME NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Networks Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office February 2003 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: White, Jr., Rickie D. 2003. Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Carl Sandburg Home National Historic Site. NatureServe: Durham, North Carolina. © 2003 NatureServe NatureServe 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama St., S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 404-562-3163 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not consitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserve.org/explorer. Cover photo: Close-up of a flower of the pink lady’s slipper (Cypripedium acaule) in an oak-hickory forest at Carl Sandburg Home National Historic Site. -
Berkov's Full Testimony with Facts About
Dr. Amy Berkov, [email protected] City College of New York, Dept. Biology I don’t understand how the city can even propose an Environmental Impact Statement for a plan that is unprecedented in its destruction: how can anyone predict impact, when there is no precedent? In my area of expertise, terrestrial biodiversity, the DEIS is incomplete, inaccurate and makes unjustified assumptions. 1) The incomplete and inaccurate assessment is based on two four-hour mid-summer walkthroughs, supplemented with external information (not site-specific). The walkthroughs documented approximately 18 bird and insect species (DEIS Appendix F1: "invertebrate species richness was low, as anticipated for a heavily-disturbed, urban system"). According to DEIS 5.6-31, the USFWS iPaC tool gave list of 58 migratory birds that might use the ESCR region. Citizen Scientists have documented >430 species, including 82 bird and 104 insect species. In DEIS Appendix H1, the NYS Natural Heritage Program lists the peregrine falcon as an endangered species known to nest on the Williamsburg bridge. The letter from NYSNHP points out: “For most sites, comprehensive field surveys have not been conducted… further information from on-site surveys or other sources may be required to fully assess impacts on biological resources.” Citizen Scientists have documented nine birds and one bumble bee that are on the NYSNHP list of rare animal species; several are Endangered or Critically Imperiled in NYS (see attached documentation from Loyan Beausoleil’s 5-month bird survey, e- bird, and iNaturalist). All ten require thoughtful, individual mitigation plans. 2) The DEIS (6.5-13) makes unjustified assumptions about the temporary nature of negative impacts when it proposes that urban wildlife will "relocate to other suitable areas".