DOCSLIB.ORG

Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 George Washington and Jefferson National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. George Washington and Jefferson National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R8 - Southern Region 04/01/2021 04:05 am MT Page 1 of 12 George Washington and Jefferson National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact George Washington and Jefferson National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R8 - Southern Region Forestwide Maintenance of - Recreation management On Hold N/A N/A Carol Croy Open and Semi Open Lands, - Grazing management 540-265-5136 Roadside Corridors, and Utility - Vegetation management [email protected] Rights-of-Way (other than forest products) EA - Road management Description: This project pertains to the open maintenance of 14,000 acres of permanent grass and shrublands, 59,000 acres of road corridors, and 6,500 acres of existing gas and power line utility rights-of-way across the entire Forest. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=50327 Location: UNIT - George Washington and Jefferson National Forest All Units. STATE - Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia. COUNTY - Letcher, Pike, Roanoke, Hampshire, Hardy, Monroe, Alleghany, Amherst, Augusta, Bath, Bedford, Bland, Botetourt, Carroll, Craig, Dickenson, Frederick, Giles, Grayson, Highland, Lee, Montgomery, Nelson, Page, Pulaski, Roanoke, Rockbridge, Rockingham, Scott, Shenandoah, Smyth, Tazewell, Warren, Washington, Wise, Wythe, Pendleton, Pocahontas. LEGAL - Not Applicable. This EA pertains to all of the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests, except for Wilderness Areas. George Washington and - Forest products In Progress: Expected:08/2021 10/2021 Jessie Howard Jefferson National Forests Oak - Vegetation management Scoping Start 10/13/2020 540-265-5130 and Woodland Restoration (other than forest products) [email protected] Project s EA Description: This is a forestwide project focused on the management of white pine stands across the Forest to increase desired mast producing hardwood species or native yellow pine. This EA will provide the framework for project selection and implementation. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=58928 Location: UNIT - George Washington and Jefferson National Forest All Units. STATE - Virginia, West Virginia. COUNTY - Roanoke, Hardy, Monroe, Radford, Alleghany, Amherst, Augusta, Bath, Bedford, Bland, Botetourt, Buchanan, Campbell, Craig, Dickenson, Giles, Grayson, Lee, Montgomery, Nelson, Pulaski, Roanoke, Rockbridge, Rockingham, Russell, Scott, Shenandoah, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, Wise, Wythe. LEGAL - Not Applicable. This project includes all of the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests Districts and the Mount Rogers National Recreation Area. George Washington and Jefferson National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R8 - Southern Region 04/01/2021 04:05 am MT Page 2 of 12 George Washington and Jefferson National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact George Washington and Jefferson National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R8 - Southern Region JNF Crown Touching Release - Vegetation management In Progress: Expected:07/2020 08/2020 Christopher Brown CE (other than forest products) Scoping Start 07/01/2019 (540) 953-3570 [email protected] d.us Description: This project will improve the competitive position of oak and other important species in young forest stands. Competing trees 1/2 to 8 inches in diameter would be cut to provide additional space and resources for the desired trees. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=56255 Location: UNIT - Glenwood and Pedlar Ranger Districts, Clinch Ranger District, Eastern Divide Ranger District, Mount Rogers National Recreation Area. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Roanoke, Bedford, Bland, Botetourt, Carroll, Craig, Dickenson, Giles, Grayson, Lee, Montgomery, Pulaski, Roanoke, Rockbridge, Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington, Wise, Wythe. LEGAL - Not Applicable. This project would be implemented across the Jefferson National Forest in suitable stands that meet the designated criteria. George Washington and Jefferson National Forest Clinch Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one R8 - Southern Region District) AEP Eagle Knob Tower Project - Special use management Completed Actual: 03/02/2021 04/2021 Nicholas DiGiacco CE 603-466-2713 [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The purpose of this project is to build a telecommunications tower to improve radio network reliability for American Electric Power. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=58754 Location: UNIT - Clinch Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Wise. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Eagle Knob Communications Site. Bob's Gap Private Road - Special use management On Hold N/A N/A David Skinner EA 276-328-2931 [email protected] Description: The proposal is to build a temporary road across National Forest Service land to private property. The road will be approximately 1.5 miles long. Location: UNIT - Clinch Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Wise. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Pine Mountain east of US 23 in Wise County. 04/01/2021 04:05 am MT Page 3 of 12 George Washington and Jefferson National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact George Washington and Jefferson National Forest Clinch Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one R8 - Southern Region District) Clinch RD Road Daylighting - Forest products In Progress: Expected:03/2021 04/2021 Charles Lane CE - Road management Scoping Start 02/04/2021 276-328-2931 [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Description: The proposed treatment would involve the removal of trees along approximately 9.6 miles of Forest Service roads. This day lighting treatment would include approximately 70 acres of commercial timber harvest. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=59442 Location: UNIT - Clinch Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Scott, Wise. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Beaverdam Gap Road, FDR 621, and Powell Mountain Road, FDR 237, in Scott and Wise Counties, Virginia. Clinch Wildlife Clearing - Forest products Completed Actual: 03/19/2021 04/2021 Charles Lane Improvement - Road management 276-328-2931 CE [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Description: This project will maintain existing wildlife clearings across the Clinch Ranger District to provide early successional herbaceous habitat for browse and cover. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=59443 Location: UNIT - Clinch Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Scott, Wise. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Across the Clinch Ranger District in Dickenson, Lee, Scott, and Wise Counties in Virginia. Devil's Fork Loop Trailhead - Recreation management On Hold N/A N/A John Olinger Parking Lot and Connector Trail 276-679-8370 x222 EA [email protected] Description: Devil's Fork Loop Trailhead Parking Lot and Connector Trail Location: UNIT - Clinch Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Scott. LEGAL - Not Applicable. 36.819653 - 82.624278. Pine Mountain Trail Reroute - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:08/2020 09/2020 John Olinger CE Scoping Start 06/04/2019 276-679-8370 x222 [email protected] Description: Pine Mountain Trail reroutes need to be done in the Doubles and Bryant Gap areas to get the trail off of private property. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=50900 Location: UNIT - Clinch Ranger District. STATE - Virginia. COUNTY - Wise. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Pine Mountain east of US 23 in Wise and Dickenson
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topography Along the Virginia-Kentucky Border
    Preface: Topography along the Virginia-Kentucky border. It took a long time for the Appalachian Mountain range to attain its present appearance, but no one was counting. Outcrops found at the base of Pine Mountain are Devonian rock, dating back 400 million years. But the rocks picked off the ground around Lexington, Kentucky, are even older; this limestone is from the Cambrian period, about 600 million years old. It is the same type and age rock found near the bottom of the Grand Canyon in Colorado. Of course, a mountain range is not created in a year or two. It took them about 400 years to obtain their character, and the Appalachian range has a lot of character. Geologists tell us this range extends from Alabama into Canada, and separates the plains of the eastern seaboard from the low-lying valleys of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. Some subdivide the Appalachians into the Piedmont Province, the Blue Ridge, the Valley and Ridge area, and the Appalachian plateau. We also learn that during the Paleozoic era, the site of this mountain range was nothing more than a shallow sea; but during this time, as sediments built up, and the bottom of the sea sank. The hinge line between the area sinking, and the area being uplifted seems to have shifted gradually westward. At the end of the Paleozoric era, the earth movement are said to have reversed, at which time the horizontal layers of the rock were uplifted and folded, and for the next 200 million years the land was eroded, which provided material to cover the surrounding areas, including the coastal plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Estillville Sheet
    DESCRIPTION OF THE ESTILLVILLE SHEET. GEOGRAPHY. ward across the States of Illinois and Indiana. course to the Ohio. South of Chattanooga the ment among the high points on Wallin Ridge, the Its eastern boundary is sharply defined by the streams flow directly to the Gulf of Mexico. even crest of Stone Mountain, and the summit of General relations. The territory represented Alleghany front and ..the Cumberland escarp­ Topography of the Appalachian province. The Powell Mountain west of Slemp Gap. Beyond by the Estillville atlas sheet is one-quarter of a ment. The rocks of this division are almost different divisions of the province vary much in Big Black Mountain, with its irregular crest, is square degree of the earth's surface, extending entirely of sedimentary origin, and remain very character of topography, as do also different por­ the even summit of Pine Mountain, planed down from latitude 36° 30' on the south to 37° on the nearly horizontal. The character of the surface, tions of the same division. This variation of top­ to the general height of the valley ridges. The north, and from longitude 82° 30' on the east to which is dependent on the character and attitude ographic forms is due to several conditions, which peneplain was originally very nearly horizontal, 83° on the west. Its average width is 27.7 miles, of the rocks, is that of a plateau more or less com­ either prevail at present or have prevailed in the but it has been tilted, so that now it varies in ele­ its length is 34.5 miles, and its area is 956.6 pletely worn down.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Knob Northern Massanutten Mountain Catback Mountain Browns Run Southern Massanutten Mountain Five Areas of Around 45,000 Acres on the Lee the West
    Sherman Bamford To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: Sherman Bamford <[email protected]> > Subject: NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage draft multi-species habitat conservation plan comments - attachments 2 12/13/2011 03:32 PM Sherman Bamford Forests Committee Chair Virginia Chapter – Sierra Club P.O. Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015 [email protected] (540) 343-6359 December 13, 2011 Regional Director, Midwest Region Attn: Lisa Mandell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Mandell: On behalf of the Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, the following are attachments to our previously submitted comments on the the NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage (“NiSource”) draft multi-species habitat conservation plan (“HCP”) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (“Service”) draft environmental impact statement (“EIS”). Draft of Virginia Mountain Treasures For descriptions and maps only. The final version was published in 2008. Some content may have changed between 2007 and 2008. Sherman Bamford Sherman Bamford PO Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015-1102 (540) 343-6359 [email protected] Virginia’s Mountain Treasures ART WORK DRAWING The Unprotected Wildlands of the George Washington National Forest A report by the Wilderness Society Cover Art: First Printing: Copyright by The Wilderness Society 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202)-843-9453 Wilderness Support Center 835 East Second Avenue Durango, CO 81302 (970) 247-8788 Founded in 1935, The Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wilderness and to develop a nation- wide network of wild lands through public education, scientific analysis, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia
    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Raids and Massacres of Southwest Virginia
    Indian Raids and Massacres of Southwest Virginia LAS VEGAS FAMILY HISTORY CENTER by Luther F. Addington and Emory L. Hamilton Published by Cecil L. Durham Kingsport, Tennessee FHL TITLE # 488344 Chapters I through XV are an exact reprint of "Indian Stories of Virginia's Last Frontier" by Luther F. Addington and originally published by The Historical Society of Southwest Virginia. Chapter XVI "Indian Tragedies Against the Walker Family" is by Emory L. Hamilton. Printed in the United States of America by Kingsport Press Kingsport, Tennessee TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INDIANS CAPTURE MARY INGLES 1 II. MURDER OF JAMES BOONE, 27 OCTOBER 10, 1773 III. MASSACRE OF THE HENRY FAMILY 35 IV. THE INDIAN MISSIONARY 38 V. CAPTURE OF JANE WHITAKER AND POLLY ALLEY 42 VI. ATTACK ON THE EVANS FAMILY, 1779 48 VII. ATTACK ON THOMAS INGLES' FAMILY 54 VIII. INDIANS AND THE MOORE FAMILY 59 IX. THE HARMANS' BATTLE 77 X. A FIGHT FOR LIFE 84 XI. CHIEF BENGE CARRIES AWAY MRS. SCOTT 88 XII. THE CAPTIVITY OF JENNY WILEY 97 XIII. MRS. ANDREW DAVIDSON AND CHILDREN CAPTURED 114 XIV. DAVID MUSICK TRAGEDY 119 XV. CHIEF BENGE'S LAST RAID 123 XVI. INDIAN TRAGEDIES AGAINST THE WALKER FAMILY NOTE: The interesting story of Caty Sage, who was stolen from her parents in Grayson County, 1792, by a vengeful white man and later grew to womanhood among the Wyandotts in the West, is well told by Mrs. Bonnie Ball in her book, Red Trails and White, Haysi, Virginia. 1 I CAPTIVITY OF MARY DRAPER INGLES Of all the young women taken into captivity by the Indians from Virginia's western frontier none suffered more anguish, nor bore her hardships more heroically, nor behaved with more thoughtfulness to­ ward her captors than did Mary Draper Ingles.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley of Virginia with Explanatory Text
    Plcase retum this publication to the Virsinia Gcological Sungy when you have no furthcr uac for it. Petase will be refuuded. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ST.ATE COMMISSION ON CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT VIRGINIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ARTHUR BEVAN, State Geologist Bulletin 42 Map of the Appalachian $'., Geologic Ti.l Valley of Virginia with Explanatory Text BY CHARLES BUTTS PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVBY Q.E 113 ne UNIVERSITY, VIRGINIA ho, {a 1933 C 3 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE COMMISSION ON CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT VIRGINIA, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ttl l I ARTHUR BEVAN, State Geologist Bulletin 42 Geologic Map of the Appalachian Valley of Virginia with Explanatory Text BY CHARLES BUTTS PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THtr UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY, VIRGINIA 1933 F.::t' :.'tFF F. Q r t7t hz, uo, $2" aopl 3 , RICHMOND: , Drwsrox or Puncrrasr ewo Pnrnrrwc 1933 .r...' .'..'. .', :".;ii':.J..1 ; i,1,'.- .li i : -. i ::: i"i 1 . : ..: :.3 -". ". I .i I i aa"..: a a-r-'ro t' a a".3 at!-i t a . .: . r o aa ? r. I a a a a -. , a a -a . 't ': STATE COMMISSION ON CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT Wrr,r,rau E. CansoN, Chai,rrnqn, Riverton Cor-BuaN Wonrne w, V i,c e -C hai,rman, Richmond E. Gnrprrrs DoosoN, Norfolk Tnoues L. Fennan, Charlottesville . Jumrus P. FrsneunN, Roanoke LsB LoNc, Dante Rurus G. Rosnnrs, Culpeper Rrcneno A. Grr,r-raiu t Erecwti,ve Secretary and Treaswrer. Richmond * t- .h. ,1r ill J .g i 5 s LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ColrruomwrAlTrr oF VrncrNra VrncrNre GBor,ocrcer, Sunvev IJxrvnnsrry op VrncrNre Cnanr,orrpsvrr,r,e, Ve., March 15, 1933.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Elevation and Forest Type on Community Assemblage and Species Distribution of Shrews in Thethe Cecen-N- Tral and Southern Appalachian Mountains
    INFLUENCE OF ELEVATION AND FOREST TYPE ON COMMUNITY ASSEMBLAGE AND SPECIES DISTRIBUTION OF SHREWS IN THETHE CECEN-N- TRAL AND SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN MOUNTAINS W. M ARK FORD , T IMOTHY S. M CCAY , M ICHAEL A. M ENZEL , W. D AVID WEBSTER , C ATHRYN H. G REENBERG , J OHN F. P AGELS , AND JOSEPH F. M ERRITT ABSTRACT We analyzed shrew community data from anced assemblage of size classes less than expected. 398,832 pitfall trapnights at 303 sites across the up- Among individual species, presence of masked per Piedmont, Blue Ridge, northern Ridge and Val- shrew ( Sorex cinereus ) and smoky shrew ( Sorex fumeus ) ley, southern Ridge and Valley, Cumberland Plateau was associated strongly with increasing elevation and Allegheny Mountains and Plateau sections of and mesic forests, whereas presence of southeastern the central and southern Appalachian Mountains shrew ( Sorex longirostris ) and southern short-tailed from Alabama to Pennsylvania. The objectives of shrew ( Blarina carolinensis ) showed an opposite trend our research were to describe regional species dis- with elevation and forest type. The strong relation- tributions and to identify macro-environmental fac- ships we documented between presence of these tors important to shrews at both the community four species with elevation and forest type facili- and individual species scales. Our study docu- tated reliable predictive habitat modeling. Con- mented the presence of nine species with a low of versely, the presence of pygmy shrew ( Sorex hoyi ) three in the southern Ridge and Valley section to a and northern short-tailed shrew ( Blarina brevicauda ) high of eight in the Blue Ridge section where the was not linked to forest type and only weakly linked Appalachian, Austral and Boreomontane fauna ele- to increasing elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups
    Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Final Report Prepared by: Christopher S. Hobson For: The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias Date: 15 April 2010 This report may be cited as follows: Hobson, C.S. 2010. Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups. Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias. April 2010. 30 pages plus appendices. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12 April 2010 Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 Geology.................................................................................................................................. 2 Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apheloria Polychroma, a New Species of Millipede from the Cumberland Mountains (Polydesmida: Xystodesmidae)
    Zootaxa 4375 (3): 409–425 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4375.3.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:10892E3E-B6E5-4118-8E15-CA1B10ADCCA9 Apheloria polychroma, a new species of millipede from the Cumberland Mountains (Polydesmida: Xystodesmidae) PAUL E. MAREK1,2, JACKSON C. MEANS1 & DEREK A. HENNEN1 1Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Entomology, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, U.S.A. 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Millipedes of the genus Apheloria Chamberlin, 1921 occur in temperate broadleaf forests throughout eastern North Amer- ica and west of the Mississippi River in the Ozark and Ouachita Mountains. Chemically defended with toxins made up of cyanide and benzaldehyde, the genus is part of a community of xystodesmid millipedes that compose several Müllerian mimicry rings in the Appalachian Mountains. We describe a model species of these mimicry rings, Apheloria polychroma n. sp., one of the most variable in coloration of all species of Diplopoda with more than six color morphs, each associated with a separate mimicry ring. Keywords: aposematic, Appalachian, Myriapoda, taxonomy, systematics Introduction Millipedes in the family Xystodesmidae are most diverse in the Appalachian Mountains where about half of the family’s species occur. In the New World, the family is distributed throughout eastern and western North America and south to El Salvador (Marek et al. 2014, Marek et al. 2017). Xystodesmidae occur in the Old World in the Mediterranean, the Russian Far East, Japan, western and eastern China, Taiwan and Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX TABLE of APPENDICES Appendix a Opinion, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Cowpasture River Preservation Association V
    APPENDIX TABLE OF APPENDICES Appendix A Opinion, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Cowpasture River Preservation Association v. Forest Service, No. 18-1144 (Dec. 13, 2018)......................... App-1 Appendix B Order, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Cowpasture River Preservation Association v. Forest Service, No. 18-1144 (Feb. 25, 2019)....................... App-67 Appendix C Record of Decision, United States Department of Agriculture, Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project Special Use Permit/Land & Resource Management Plan Amendment (Nov. 17, 2017) ............. App-69 Appendix D Relevant Statutory Provisions ................ App-237 30 U.S.C. §185 ...................................... App-237 16 U.S.C. §1244 .................................... App-237 16 U.S.C. §1246 .................................... App-289 16 U.S.C. §521 ...................................... App-301 App-1 Appendix A UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-1144 ________________ COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION; HIGHLANDERS FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT; SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION; SHENANDOAH VALLEY NETWORK; SIERRA CLUB; VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE; WILD VIRGINIA, INC., Petitioners, v. FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Agriculture; KATHLEEN ATKINSON, in her official capacity as Regional Forester of the Eastern Region; KEN ARNEY, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Forester of the Southern Region, Respondents, ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
    [Show full text]
  • May 7, 2010 Maureen T. Hyzer, Forest Supervisor ATTN
    May 7, 2010 Maureen T. Hyzer, Forest Supervisor ATTN: George Washington Plan Revision George Washington & Jefferson National Forests 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019–3050 [email protected] BY E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL Re: George Washington Plan Revision – Comments on Notice of Intent published 3/10/2010 Dear Ms. Hyzer and GW Plan Revision Team: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact statement and revised land management plan using the provisions of the 1982 National Forest System land and resource management planning regulations for the George Washington National Forest (GW), 75 Fed. Reg. 11107 (Mar. 10, 2010). Please accept the following comments on behalf of the Southern Environmental Law Center, the Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition, and The Wilderness Society. We are glad that the GW will revise its plan under the 1982 National Forest Management Act (NFMA) regulations, as well as prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the plan and consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). These important environmental reviews and protections have been missing from the plan revision, which was begun under the now-invalidated 2005/2008 NFMA regulations. With the NOI, however, the GW has released a highly detailed, virtually complete draft revised forest plan. This plan is based on analyses conducted under those weak, invalid 2005/2008 regulations, rather than on the requirements of the 1982 regulations now governing the revision, such as maintaining fish and wildlife species population viability and identifying lands not suitable for timber production based on certain factors laid out in the rule.
    [Show full text]