And the Same Forms Are the Characteristic Fossils There, Ax
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1861.] BUNBUI~Y--FOSSILPLANTS, NAGPUR, 32~ Turbo helicinus. In the equivalent strata of the Zechstein there is a similar falling off in the distribution of species ; and the same forms are the characteristic fossils there, Ax. dubius under its "Schlotheimi" character being the most common. It would thus appear that in the whole of the West European area there was a most remarkable decrease in the Permian fauna during the period of deposition of the Upper Permian strata, the decrease being greater towards the close than at the beginning of that period, and affecting the same classes, and even the same species in most cases, in the different parts of that area, thus leaving a similar though exceedingly meagre group of species distributed throughout. EXPLANATION OF PLATE VII. Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6. Rissoa Leighi, Brown. Five specimens illustrative of its variation of form ; magnified about 14 times. Hampole. Fig. 3. Rissoa Leighi, Brown. Youngindividual ; magnified16 times. Hampole. lfigs. 7, 8. .Natica minima ? Brown. Outer lip of specimen imperfect; mag- nified 12 times. Hampole. Figs. 9, 10. Turri~ella Al~enburgensis. Geinitz. ~[agnified16 times, ltampole. Fig. ] 1. Axinus dubius, Schlotheim." New variety. Cast; somewhat enlarged. Moorhouse. Fig. 12. A~inus dubius, Sehlotheim. New variety. Cast; somewhat enlarged. Conisborough. MAac~ 20, 1861. The following communications were read :-- 1. Notes on a CoT.~cTIo~ of FossIT. PLXWTSfrom N~aeUl~, CENTRAL INDIA. By Sir CHARLES J. F. B~BbRY, BART., F.R.S., F.G.S., &c. [Plates VIII--XII.] Introduction.--It is now some considerable time since the fine collection of fossil vegetable remains from the district of N~gpur in Central India, which had been presented to the Geological Society by the Rev. Messrs. Stephen Hislop and Robert Hunter ~, was en- trusted to me for examination and description. Owing to the obscure and equivocal character of many of these remains, the undertaking proved more tedious than I had expected, and there still remain many specimens to which I have not yet been able to give a thorough examination. But, as particular circumstances make it unlikely that I should, for some time to come, have sufficient leisure to devote to this pursuit, I think it best to lay before the Society at once the results of my inquiries as far as they have yet gone, rather than to keep them back for an indefinite time in the hope of com- pleting them. The present paper, therefore, wiU contain the descrip, tion of all the Ferns in the collection, and of all those remains of Stems and Leaves of other kinds which I have, to the best of my ability, sufficiently examined; these altogether constitute nearly * See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xi. p. 348 and p. 369. 326 PROOEEDINOS OF THE GBOLOGICAL SOCIETY. [Mar. 20, three'fourths of the collection. The Fruifi~ and Seeds, of which the specimens are pretty numerous, but obscure and dittlcult to determine, are reserved for further examination. I may observe, however, that, though numerous in individuals, they seem to be little varied in form and character, and present no outward evidences of a high organiza- tion. The general remarks which form the latter part of this paper are founded, I must observe, not merely on the close examination which I have given to the specimens herein described, but on a general survey of the whole. It is possible that a more minute examination of the remaining fossils (the Fruits and Seeds) may partially modify some of the conclusions I have drawn, wbut not, I think, to any very material extent. FERNS. 1 (A). Gr,ossoP~IS BROW~X~A, var. Indica, Ad. Brongn. Hist. V6g. Foss. p. 223, pl. 62. f. 2. P1. VIII. figs. 1-4. This, as appears from the very numerous specimens in the collec- tion, is one of the most common plants of the supposed Jurassic beds of N~gpur. Excepting one doubtful fragment from Ktlmpti, all the specimens are from Silewgd~, and are very numerous, of large size, and in a fine state of preservation ; yet even among these it is not usual to find a frond with both extremities perfect. One specimen, though broken at both ends, still measures 14 inches in length, and must have measured at least 17 inches when perfect. Another (almost perfect) is 14 inches long; the largest I have seen is 16 inches long in its present state (with the apex broken off), and must cer- tainly have been 18 inches. On the whole, from a comparison of numerous specimens from this locality, we may say that the full- grown fronds were from 10 to 18 inches in length (exclusive of the stalk), and seldom more than 2~ inches in their greatest breadth. The outline of the frond in all these fine specimens from Sflew~ids is narrower, more lanceolate, and more tapering to a point, than in Brongniart's original Australian plants, and even than in his figure of the Indian variety (pl. 62. fig. 2). Like the Australian plant, however, it always tapers very gradually to the base, passing almost insensibly into the stalk (of which but a small portion is preserved in any specimen that I have seen) ; and the greatest breadth is generally above the middle. The apex of the frond, wherever it is preserved, always tapers regularly into a very acute point. The midrib is remarkably broad, but flattish, and not very promi- nent, strongly striateq], tapering very gradually upwards, and reaching quite to the point. Morris long since remarked (in Count Strzeleeki's ' New South Wales,' p. 248) that the venation of the specimens examined by him did not altogether agree with Brongniart's descrip- tion, and that the reticulation of the lateral veins was not confined to the neighbourhood of the midrib, but that they anastomosed repeatedly at various distances between the midrib and "the margin. Brongniart has since repeated (in his ' Tableau des Genres de Vdg. Foss.') his original character of the genus, without taking any 1861.] BWBURY--~OSSILr~.A~TS, ~AOPV~. 327 notice of ~[orris's remarks. My observations, however, both on the N~Igpur specimens and on the numerous Australian ones which I have examined, agree with those of Morris. The lateral veins (which are very fine and dose) are repeatedly forked near the midrib, and there form, by the anastomosing of their branches, a conspicuous reticulation, of which the meshes are somewhat oblong. Towards the margin they become nearly parallel, forking very sparingly, and anastomosing at long intervals, so as to form very long and narrow meshes; but still they do anastomose here and there, even to the margin. The venation of the New South Wales GIossopteris agrees in these characters with that of the Indian plant ; and one of Brongniart's figures (fig. 1 A, pl. 62) represents the veins correctly, though somewhat at variance with his own description. In the Ndgpur specimens which I refer to this species, I find some degree of variation in the fineness and closeness of the veins-- such an amount of difference, indeed, occasionally, as might at first sight seem to imply a distinction of species ; but there are so many intermediate gradations that I do not find it possible to draw the line. I think it probable that these differences may depend partly upon the age of the frond, partly, perhaps, upon various conditions attending the fossihzing process, as I have observed that the apparent closeness of the veins in some reaent Ferns is influenced by circum- stances in the process of drying. The position of the fructification is indicated in several of these specimens by small round spots, very regularly arranged in 1 or 2 rows parallel to the margin--the outermost row at but a short distance from the margin, the inner about half-way between the outer and the midrib. When there is only one row, it is always the inner one that is wanting. In these spots I can find no organic structure at all, but only little lumps of the sandstone, as if not only the sori themselves, but the very substance of the frond had decayed or been displaced at these points. I think, however, from the regu- larity of their form and arrangement, there can be no doubt that they really indicate the places of the sori. * I perceive no trace of scales on the midrib or stalk of even the best-preserved specimens. ]k[. de Zigno has expressed an opinion that the Glossopteris Brown- iana had a compound or digitate frond, as the allied Sagenopterls Phillil~sii had; indeed, he quotes a report that a specimen had been found to establish this fact. I confess, however, that I can find nothing in corroboration of his opinion. Among the numerous specimens I have examined of the Indian Glossopteris (some of the large slabs of stone from Silew~tdg containing as many as ten or twelve fronds), I can see nothing to indicate that the leaves were portions of a divided or lobed frond, or were otherwise than simple fronds, like those of our ]=fart's-tongue Fern, or of the Bird's-nest Asplenium (A. nidus, L.). Neither can I find any different struc- ture in this respect in the AustraHan specimens of Glossopteris that I have seen, nor does McCoy mention any in his memoir. Dr. McClelland (Report of the Geological Survey of India, 1850) has 328 PRoc~.Dn~s OF T~E GEOLOOIeAT. socr~rY. [Mar. 20~ indeed figured a specimen of O/ossopt~r/s which might at first sight be supposed to show a digitate form of frond; but on examination of the drawing, it is clear that the leaves did not all grow in the same plane, and that, instead of being leaflets of a digitate frond, they are really simple fronds growing in a tuft (as is so common in recent Ferns) from a short thick rhizoma.