DOCSLIB.ORG

Nature Tanzania ‘People and Conservation: Promoting Awareness Raising As a Tool for Bird Conservation in Tanzania’ Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nature Tanzania ‘People and Conservation: Promoting Awareness Raising As a Tool for Bird Conservation in Tanzania’ Project NATURE TANZANIA ‘PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION: PROMOTING AWARENESS RAISING AS A TOOL FOR BIRD CONSERVATION IN TANZANIA’ PROJECT FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE AFRICAN BIRD CLUB JANUARY 2020 1. Acknowledgment Nature Tanzania acknowledges and thanks to the African Bird Club for their financial support on this project. Their commitment to helping Nature Tanzania, youths and students in Tanzania is highly acknowledged. Through this project, Nature Tanzania has been able to build capacity and raise awareness of more than 340 people in Arusha, 234 people in Dar es Salaam and 80 people in Amani Nature Reserve. The Government of Tanzania is highly acknowledged for allowing us to implement this project in Tanzania. We thank the technical support we have received from BirdLife International Tanzania office, the Malihai Clubs of Tanzania, the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU), The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), The Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) and the Arusha International Conference Centre (AICC) for their technical and additional financial support into this project. BirdLife International Africa is also thanked for its commitment to seeing this project a success. Moreover, a 2019 annual waterbird count was organized and fully funded by the BirdLife’s project in Lake Natron Ramsar Site. The Attraction Birding Club (ABC) is acknowledged for being an active member of bird walks and talks. Students and school administration of FEA, Wisdom college are also thanked for their good participation and eagerness to learn birds. Mr. Emmanuel Richard has been very supportive in assisting the coordination of bird walks activities in Arusha. Dr. Jasson John and the University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM) are acknowledged and thanked for their commitment to organizing and conducting similar activities in Dar es Salaam. UDSM students are also acknowledged by this project. University of Dodoma (UDOM) is acknowledged for releasing a total of 10 students and 1 lecturer to participate in the 2019 annual waterbird count at Bahi wetlands. 2. List of Acronyms ABC - The African Bird Club AGM - Annual General Meeting AICC – Arusha International Conference Centre EECDI – Engaresero Eramatare Community Development Initiative FEA - Foundation for Empowerment and Advocacy UDOM – University of Dodoma UDSM – University of Dar es Salaam TANAPA – Tanzania National Parks TEMDO - Tanzania Manufacturing and Engineering Organisation WMBD - World Migratory Bird Day 3. Table of contents 4. Introduction Nature Tanzania received financial support from the African Bird Club (ABC) to implement the ‘People and conservation: Promoting awareness raising as a tool for bird conservation in Tanzania’ project in Tanzania. The 12 months project was implemented from January 2019 to December 2019. The project was implemented in Arusha, Dar es Salaam, and Tanga. Dr. Jasson John coordinated project activities in Dar es Salaam, while in Arusha and Tanga Nature Tanzania coordinated the activities. The project aimed at raising public awareness on bird conservation through nature-talks, bird walks, national print, and electronic media. The project was built on the fact that awareness and knowledge are important factors for behavior and perception change. It is therefore very important to raise public awareness, especially of Tanzanian youths on bird conservation by using public talks, monthly bird walks, national print media, electronic media, and website. Bird walks and talks were used to inform the participants of the values and benefits of birds in supporting life systems i.e. ecosystem services including supporting the agriculture industry through pollination, seed dispersal. The role of birds in balancing our ecosystem by controlling diseases i.e. scavenging vultures was highly emphasized during this project. The focus areas of this project were in the following areas; Lake Natron Ramsar Site, Arusha town and Lake Duluti in Arusha region; Dar e Dar es Salaam coast and Dar es Salaam University forests in Dar es Salaam region. However, because of the emerging need and requests from communities, the project was also able to support similar activities in Amani Nature Reserve, Tanga region. Moreover, due to financial limitations, the project was not able to design and print leaflets and brochures. This project has also supported Mr. Lawrence Manjira in the electronification of his multilingual Special Tanzania Guide Book for online access on the Amazon website. The book includes information for visitors and residents about Tanzania. This project was able to bring together youths, students, amateur birding and other interested parties in Dar es Salaam and Arusha for ensuring bird conservation and awareness of their value is well understood at all levels. The project was also able to engage government officials and community members in bird monitoring activities and also in nature talk. The project has also supported commemoration of the World Migratory bird day in the regions of Arusha and Dar es Salaam. In Arusha, bird walks and nature-talks were organized and conducted by Nature Tanzania in collaboration with tourism colleges located in the Arusha region. These include the Arusha Wisdom College of Tourism and FEA College. Other collaborating institutions in Arusha were the Malihai Clubs of Tanzania. In Dar es Salaam, the activities were organized and conducted by Dr. Jasson John of the University of Dar es Salaam. A detailed technical report for Dar es Salaam activities is attached as Annex 1 of this report. 1 In this report, we are also updating activities that were implemented in connection to this project but were funded by other financial sources within Nature Tanzania and our partner, Bird International. This includes the 2019 annual waterbird count at Bahi wetlands, 2019 annual waterbird count at Lake Natron Ramsar Site, the participation of project partners in the 2 nd Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Nature Tanzania. Several bird watching activities reported in this report were supported by other sources within Nature Tanzania. For sustainability, a special request is hereby lodged to the (ABC) by Nature Tanzania, youths, students and other participants for a project extension. 5. Methods: 5.1 Bird Walks In Dar es Salaam, bird walks were monthly organized and conducted by Dr. Jasson John of the University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM). This is on the first Saturday of every month from 7 am to 10 am. The bird walks were open to members of the UDSM bird watching club, academic staff of UDSM, primary and secondary students from schools in Dar es Salaam and its outskirts. The sites which were monitored include the forests within the University of Dar es Salaam grounds. Costs of participation by students were covered by Dr. Jasson John from the support received from this project. This includes soft drinks and snacks for UDSM students and bus fares for students from secondary and primary students. This was mainly to support interested students who in most cases do not have the financial capacity. In Arusha, bird walks were organized and conducted by Nature Tanzania in collaboration with several of its academic institution partners. These are FEA training Institute, Sila College, Wisdom College and the Attraction Birding Club (ABC). Moreover, some members of the Malihai Clubs of Tanzania had participated. Bird walks at Lake Natron Ramsar Site were conducted in collaboration with the BirdLife International, Tanzania project office under their Lake Natron Eco-tourism project. Please see section 5.2 below for a detailed methodology on counting the lesser flamingo. The bird walking events in Arusha were conducted twice every month mostly on Fridays and Saturdays starting on average from 7 am to 12 pm and sometimes whole day birding were conducted especially at Oldonyo Sambu. The sites which were monitored include Nanja wetlands, Oldonyo Sambu, Njiro area, Lake Duluti Forest Reserve. In Arusha, participating which included transports on public means, soft drinks and snacks were covered by Nature Tanzania through this project. This was done mainly to motivate students and other interested people who don’t have the financial capacity to attend these organized events. In both sites, binoculars, telescope and bird field guide books were used during these events. Cameras were also used to take pictures that were then updated on our social media. Because of the nature of the participants, who were mostly students and early learning birder, scientific methods were less used to allow and encourage learning through questions and discussions. In this way, the project has been able to stir enthusiasm on knowing many species as possible as well as the learning behaviors of respective bird species. 5.2 Lesser flamingo count at Lake Natron Ramsar Site Lesser flamingos’ abundance at Lake Natron in February 2019 was determined using the ground survey method following Bibby et al. (2000). The count was conducted by the Lake Natron Ecotourism project team, community volunteers and local tour guides from Engaresero Eramatare Community Development Initiative (EECDI). The volunteers were trained on waterbird count and flamingo identification (the difference between lesser and greater). We also made sure each group had one local guide who is good at bird identification. Because of logistics and resources, the Lake was divided into 3 sectors i.e. Pinyinyi lagoon, Magadini lagoon and Engaresero mudflat were conducted. The volunteers distributed themselves in counting birds in the stations synchronous. For large groups of birds, birds were estimated in subgroups of 100 or 1,000 birds. The number of birds at each station were obtained as a mean of the value of each counter. The mean count from each team was recorded and the total number of a lesser flamingo for a particular lagoon was obtained by summing the total means value of all teams in each station. The fact that lesser and greater flamingo intermingles during feeding and that large group of birds will be counted in groups of 100 or 1,000 birds, chances of counting greater flamingo together with lesser flamingo might occur.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species List (Note, There Was a Pre-Tour to Kenya in 2018 As in 2017, but These Species Were Not Recorded
    Tanzania Species List (Note, there was a pre-tour to Kenya in 2018 as in 2017, but these species were not recorded. You can find a Kenya list with the fully annotated 2017 Species List for reference) February 6-18, 2018 Guides: Preston Mutinda and Peg Abbott, Driver/guides William Laiser and John Shoo, and 6 participants: Rob & Anita, Susan and Jan, and Bob and Joan KEYS FOR THIS LIST The # in (#) is the number of days the species was seen on the tour (E) – endemic BIRDS STRUTHIONIDAE: OSTRICHES OSTRICH Struthio camelus massaicus – (8) ANATIDAE: DUCKS & GEESE WHITE-FACED WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna viduata – (2) FULVOUS WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna bicolor – (1) COMB DUCK Sarkidiornis melanotos – (1) EGYPTIAN GOOSE Alopochen aegyptiaca – (12) SPUR-WINGED GOOSE Plectropterus gambensis – (2) RED-BILLED DUCK Anas erythrorhyncha – (4) HOTTENTOT TEAL Anas hottentota – (2) CAPE TEAL Anas capensis – (2) NUMIDIDAE: GUINEAFOWL HELMETED GUINEAFOWL Numida meleagris – (12) PHASIANIDAE: PHEASANTS, GROUSE, AND ALLIES COQUI FRANCOLIN Francolinus coqui – (2) CRESTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus sephaena – (2) HILDEBRANDT'S FRANCOLIN Francolinus hildebrandti – (3) Naturalist Journeys [email protected] 866.900.1146 / Caligo Ventures [email protected] 800.426.7781 naturalistjourneys.com / caligo.com P.O. Box 16545 Portal AZ 85632 FAX: 650.471.7667 YELLOW-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus leucoscepus – (4) [E] GRAY-BREASTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus rufopictus – (4) RED-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus afer – (2) LITTLE GREBE Tachybaptus ruficollis – (1) PHOENICOPTERIDAE:FLAMINGOS
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the January 2018 Waterbird Counts in Kenya Covering the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp
    The NATIONAL MUSEUMS of KENYA January 2018 Waterbird Count Results in the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp Oliver Nasirwa, Paul Mungai, Fleur Ng’weno, Lennox Kirao, Edwin Gichohi, Dominic Chesire, Timothy Ikime and Fred Barasa CENTRE FOR BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH REPORTS: ORNITHOLOGY NO. 83, MARCH 2018 Supported by: 1 Results of the January 2018 waterbird counts in Kenya covering the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp. January 2018 Waterbird Count Results in the Rift Valley, Nairobi, Central, Coast, Amboseli and Yala Swamp Oliver Nasirwa1, Paul Mungai2, Fleur Ng’weno3, Lennox Kirao4, Edwin Gichohi1, Dominic Chesire1, Timothy Ikime and Fred Barasa3 1National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658-00100, Nairobi, Kenya, [email protected]; 2Kenya Wildlife Service, PO Box 20241–00100, Nairobi, Kenya, [email protected]; 3Nature Kenya (EANHS), PO Box 44486- 00100, Nairobi, Kenya, [email protected]; 4A Rocha Kenya, PO Box 383–80202, Watamu, Kenya, [email protected]. Summary Waterbird counts were carried out in 48 sites across Kenya during the months of January and February 2018. A total of 294,950 individuals of 126 waterbird species were recorded. Lake Bogoria had the highest number with 165,852 individuals of 34 waterbird species followed by Lake Nakuru with 23,144 individuals of 73 species and Tana River Delta with 16,143 individuals of 69 species. The highest number of waterbird species was recorded at Lake Nakuru with 73 species, followed by Lake Ol’Bolossat with 72 species and Lake Naivasha with 71 species. The most abundant species was Lesser Flamingo Phoeniconaias minor with 163,164 individuals followed by Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber with 14,155 and Little Stint Calidris minuta with 11,401.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Body Size in Determining Dominance Hierarchies Among Diverse Tropical Frugivores1
    BIOTROPICA 37(1): 96–101 2005 Importance of Body Size in Determining Dominance Hierarchies among Diverse Tropical Frugivores1 Aaron R. French Center for Tropical Research and Department of Biology, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, U.S.A. and Thomas B. Smith2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, Box 951496, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1496, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Most studies examining dominance hierarchies have focused at the intraspecific level. While some examples of interspecific hierarchies have been noted, these have usually been limited to a few species in the same taxonomic group that utilize resources in similar ways. Here, we examine evidence for dominance interference competition among vertebrates comprising a diverse frugivore community, including 19 species of birds, squirrels, and primates in a mature Central African rainforest. A total of 38 fruiting trees from 18 species were observed for 2058 h to record dominance interactions between foraging vertebrates. We show that interference competition occurs within and between taxonomically diverse species of vertebrates at fruiting trees. The resulting cross-taxonomic dominance hierarchy includes larger vertebrates, such as primates and hornbills, as well as smaller ones, such as squirrels and parrots. Within this hierarchy, the dominance rank of each species is highly correlated with body mass, and is shown to significantly affect the number of fruits removed from a given tree. Because a majority of tropical tree species depend on vertebrates to disperse their seeds, and particular vertebrates may preferentially disperse the seeds of specific tree species, results may have important conservation implications for the maintenance of tree diversity in regions where populations of larger frugivores have been depressed or extirpated.
    [Show full text]
  • MINOX - He São Tomé Grosbeak Neospiza the Link to Amblyospiza in 1962
    NEWS & VIEWS the grosbeak weighs twice as much as its suspected that it would be 101 years be- Martim captured another three individu- closest relative, further emphasising the fore it was rediscovered in August 1991 als near where Sinclair and Sargeant re- the world’s extent of its gigantism. by a group of birdwatchers that included discovered the species. The two sister species apparently di- Dave Sargeant and Ian Sinclair. During the past decade an increas- verged within the past million years, ing number of visits by birdwatchers THE grosbeak WEIGHS when São Tomé was experiencing signifi- have led to additional sightings, almost cant volcanic activity. The evolution of TWICE as MUCH as Its all in the same areas where the captures largest the grosbeak’s extreme phenotype in such CLosest RELatIVE, FUrtHER were made. Concerted survey efforts, a relatively short time span suggests that EMPHasISING THE EXTENT OF led by Ricardo Lima and BirdLife Inter- strong natural selection drove the mor- Its GIGANTISM national, have resulted in a better un- phological divergence of the two species, derstanding of the species’ distribution canary presumably to allow their co-existence by The fact that two of the three specimens on the island (https://doi.org/10.1017/ targeting different food items, and hence collected by Newton were lost in the 1978 S0959270916000241). SÃO TOMÉ GROSBEAK reduce interspecific competition. Selec- fire that destroyed the Natural History The grosbeak is without doubt the most tion appears to have been most marked Museum in Lisbon served to deepen the difficult-to-observe bird on São Tomé and on the proto-grosbeak population, as the aura of mystery surrounding this spe- although it is clear that it depends on pri- seedeaters on São Tomé differ little from cies, long thought to be extinct and now mary forest, no clear pattern of habitat those found on Príncipe and Boné de classified as Critically Endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Trip Report 12Th to 28Th September 2014
    Malawi Trip Report 12th to 28th September 2014 Bohm’s Bee-eater by Keith Valentine Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader: Keith Valentine RBT Malawi Trip Report September 2014 2 Top 10 Birds: 1. Scarlet-tufted Sunbird 2. Pel’s Fishing Owl 3. Lesser Seedcracker 4. Thyolo Alethe 5. White-winged Apalis 6. Racket-tailed Roller 7. Blue Swallow 8. Bohm’s Flycatcher 9. Babbling Starling 10. Bohm’s Bee-eater/Yellow-throated Apalis Top 5 Mammals: 1. African Civet 2. Four-toed Elephant Shrew 3. Sable Antelope 4. Bush Pig 5. Side-striped Jackal/Greater Galago/Roan Antelope/Blotched Genet Trip Summary This was our first ever fully comprehensive tour to Malawi and was quite simply a fantastic experience in all respects. For starters, many of the accommodations are of excellent quality and are also situated in prime birding locations with a large number of the area’s major birding targets found in close proximity. The food is generally very good and the stores and lodges are for the most part stocked with decent beer and a fair selection of South African wine. However, it is the habitat diversity that is largely what makes Malawi so good from a birding point of view. Even though it is a small country, this good variety of habitat, and infrastructure that allows access to these key zones, insures that the list of specials is long and attractive. Our tour was extremely successful in locating the vast majority of the region’s most wanted birds and highlights included Red-winged Francolin, White-backed Night Heron, African Cuckoo-Hawk, Western Banded Snake
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone Bumbuna Hydroelectric
    Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone Ministry of Energy and Power Public Disclosure Authorized Bumbuna Hydroelectric Project Environmental Impact Assessment Draft Final Report - Appendices Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized January 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized in association with BMT Cordah Ltd Appendices Document Orientation The present EIA report is split into three separate but closely related documents as follows: Volume1 – Executive Summary Volume 2 – Main Report Volume 3 – Appendices This document is Volume 3 – Appendices. Nippon Koei UK, BMT Cordah and Environmental Foundation for Africa i Appendices Glossary of Acronyms AD Anno Domini AfDB African Development Bank AIDS Auto-Immune Deficiency Syndrome ANC Antenatal Care BCC Behavioural Change Communication BHP Bumbuna Hydroelectric Project BWMA Bumbuna Watershed Management Authority BOD Biochemical Oxygen Demand BP Bank Procedure (World Bank) CBD Convention on Biodiversity CHC Community Health Centre CHO Community Health Officer CHP Community Health Post CLC Community Liaison Committee COD Chemical Oxygen Demand dbh diameter at breast height DFID Department for International Development (UK) DHMT District Health Management Team DOC Dissolved Organic Carbon DRP Dam Review Panel DUC Dams Under Construction EA Environmental Assessment ECA Export Credit Agency EFA Environmental Foundation for Africa EHS Environment, Health and Safety EHSO Environment, Health and Safety Officer EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Literature
    122 RecentLiterature ['Auk L Jan. RECENT LITERATURE Audubon's'Birds of America,' 1941.--The successof the 1937 edition of Audubon's platesin a singlevolume which sold for $12.50,was so far beyondexpectations, that the publishersnow bring out this new editionx at a price that will bc cvcn more popular. The chief differenceis, however,that only the 435 platesof the original elephant-folioset arc now reproduced,while the 65 additionalplates of the previousvolume arc omitted. The frontispieceshows the fine Cruickshank portrait of Audubon,and there is the sameintroductory Preface by William Vogt. The four linesof text at the bottomof eachplate, in doublecolumn, wcrc pre- pared by the sameauthor and give in briefestform the range,habitat, identifica- tion marks,voice, breeding and food habits, or in certain casesspecial notes. At the back of the volumeis a list of the original legendsto the plates together with an index of the commonnames of the speciesshown. Printed from the same set of plates used in the previousedition, the vivid figuresarc in the main well reproduced,except that as in all such color work, therearc occasionalinstances where the colorssccm too red or toopale or in some other way arc not quite as they should be. But it must bc rememberedtoo, that the originalsarc not maps of the birds' colorsbut rather show the color valuesas they appearedto the artist'scyc. The avidity with which the public absorbedthe prcv/ous edition indicates the wide desire for a set of the famous platesat a moderateprice. This new volumenow makesthem available to nearly all who arc interested in Audubon and his work.--G.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrier References
    Introduction This is the final version of the Harrier's list, no further updates will be made. Grateful thanks to Wietze Janse and Tom Shevlin (www.irishbirds.ie) for the cover images and all those who responded with constructive feedback. All images © the photographers. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2019. IOC World Bird List. Available from: https://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 9.1 accessed January 2019]). Final Version Version 1.4 (January 2019). Cover Main image: Western Marsh Harrier. Zevenhoven, Groene Jonker, Netherlands. 3rd May 2011. Picture by Wietze Janse. Vignette: Montagu’s Harrier. Great Saltee Island, Co. Wexford, Ireland. 10th May 2008. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Species Page No. African Marsh Harrier [Circus ranivorus] 8 Black Harrier [Circus maurus] 10 Cinereous Harrier [Circus cinereus] 17 Eastern Marsh Harrier [Circus spilonotus] 6 Hen Harrier [Circus cyaneus] 11 Long-winged Harrier [Circus buffoni] 9 Malagasy Harrier [Circus macrosceles] 9 Montagu's Harrier [Circus pygargus] 20 Northern Harrier [Circus hudsonius] 16 Pallid Harrier [Circus macrourus] 18 Papuan Harrier [Circus spilothorax] 7 Pied Harrier [Circus melanoleucos] 20 Réunion Harrier [Circus maillardi] 9 Spotted Harrier [Circus assimilis] 9 Swamp Harrier [Circus approximans] 7 Western Marsh Harrier [Circus aeruginosus] 4 1 Relevant Publications Balmer, D. et al. 2013. Bird Atlas 2001-11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetford. Beaman, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Laniarius Spp.) in Coastal Kenya and Somalia
    Brian W. Finch et al. 74 Bull. B.O.C. 2016 136(2) Redefining the taxonomy of the all-black and pied boubous (Laniarius spp.) in coastal Kenya and Somalia by Brian W. Finch, Nigel D. Hunter, Inger Winkelmann, Karla Manzano-Vargas, Peter Njoroge, Jon Fjeldså & M. Thomas P. Gilbert Received 21 October 2015 Summary.—Following the rediscovery of a form of Laniarius on Manda Island, Kenya, which had been treated as a melanistic morph of Tropical Boubou Laniarius aethiopicus for some 70 years, a detailed field study strongly indicated that it was wrongly assigned. Molecular examination proved that it is the same species as L. (aethiopicus) erlangeri, until now considered a Somali endemic, and these populations should take the oldest available name L. nigerrimus. The overall classification of coastal boubous also proved to require revision, and this paper presents a preliminary new classification for taxa in this region using both genetic and morphological data. Genetic evidence revealed that the coastal ally of L. aethiopicus, recently considered specifically as L. sublacteus, comprises two unrelated forms, requiring a future detailed study. The black-and-white boubous—characteristic birds of Africa’s savanna and wooded regions—have been treated as subspecies of the highly polytypic Laniarius ferrugineus (Rand 1960), or subdivided, by separating Southern Boubou L. ferrugineus, Swamp Boubou L. bicolor and Turati’s Boubou L. turatii from the widespread and geographically variable Tropical Boubou L. aethiopicus (Hall & Moreau 1970, Fry et al. 2000, Harris & Franklin 2000). They are generally pied, with black upperparts, white or pale buff underparts, and in most populations a white wing-stripe.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Distribution and Abundance the Case of Mettu District, ILU ABA BOR Zone, Southwest Ethiopia
    Volume 5, Issue 1, January – 2020 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology ISSN No:-2456-2165 Avian Distribution and Abundance the Case of Mettu District, ILU ABA BOR Zone, Southwest Ethiopia Alemayehu Dagne 1*, Getaneh Wase2 Ayelew Zeleke 3 1* Department of Biology, 2Department of Biology, 3Department of Biology, Faculty of Computational and Faculty of Computational and College of Natural Sciences, Natural Sciences, Mettu University, Natural Sciences, Mettu University, Mizan- Tepi University Mettu, Ethiopia. P.O.Box: 318, Mettu, Ethiopia. P.O.Box: 318, Mettu, Ethiopia. Mettu, Ethiopia. Abstract:- Ecosystem health and functioning is In Southwest Ethiopia three Man and Biosphere determined by presence bird species diversity and reserves Majang, Yayo, Kafa Biosphere was recorded by abundance. Survey on avain variety and abundance was UNESCO in 2018 and 2010 respectively. Furthermore conducted from May –July 2019, a total eight point Baroye control hunting area, Gambella national parks and count method which represents the study area was Nonno Sale forest Priority area is some of protected area systematically selected, birds were identified at species which is known by biodiversity hotspot area possessing level using binocular, bird call, song and naked eye in diverse flora and fauna. the morning 6;00-10:10 a.m) and afternoon(4:00-6:00 p.m). Data were collected by using point count method According to Sethy et al. (4) assessment of bird species techniques in the early morning (6:00-10:00 a.m.) and diversity, distribution, abundance is crucial to determine the late afternoon (4:00-6:00 p.m.) During the study period, health status the local ecosystem and also serve for a total of 646 individual birds belonging to 65 species, 26 ecotourism, aesthetic, educational and scientific research.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa : Cape to Kruger
    South Africa : Cape to Kruger September 12 - 26, 2019 Greg Smith, with Dalton Gibbs & Nick Fordyce as local expert guides with 10 participants: Renata, Linda, Sandy, Liz, Terry, Rita & Mike, Laura & George, Rebecca & David List compiled by Greg Smith Summary: Our unspoken goal was to surpass last year’s species list in numbers – bringing even more magic to the trip than the three guides had viewed with 2018’s clients. And we accomplished this by finding 100 more bird species than last year! This success was due to weather, clients and past experience. Given that we were further south on the continent, there were still some migrants that hadn’t quite made it to the tip of Africa. We excelled on raptors with twenty-four species and with mammal numbers coming in at 51 species. We achieved great looks at Africa’s Big Five on two of our three days in Kruger National Park, which is a success given the status of the white rhinoceros. The weather cooperated both in the Western Cape where much needed sporadic rain happened mostly during the night time hours, and in the eastern part of the country where the summer rainy season waited until two days after our departure. The following list gives you an indication of just how rich South Africa is in diversity with wildlife and birds, but doesn’t even point to its world-renowned plant biomes. Take a read and enjoy what we experienced… BIRDS: 359 species recorded OSTRICHES: Struthionidae (1) Common Ostrich Struthio camelus— Our time in Kruger was where we saw most of the wild birds, not common though
    [Show full text]