DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 13, Mediterranean California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 13, Mediterranean California 13 MEDITERRANEAN CALIFORNIA M.E. Fenn, E.B. Allen, L.H. Geiser 13.1 Ecoregion Description mixes depending on elevation and site conditions, but are typically characterized by dense mixed-aged stands Th e Mediterranean California ecoregion (CEC 1997; composed of coniferous (pine [Pinus spp.] and often fi r Fig 2.2) encompasses the greater Central Valley, [Abies spp.] and incense cedar [Calocedrus decurrrens]) Sierra foothills, and central coast ranges of California and broadleaved species (commonly oaks). south to Mexico and is bounded by the Pacifi c Ocean, Sierra Nevada Mountains and Mojave Desert. Th e 13.2 Coastal Sage Scrub ecoregion description is adapted from CEC (1997). It is distinguished by its warm, mild Mediterranean 13.2.1 Ecosystem Description climate, chaparral vegetation, agriculturally productive Coastal sage scrub is a semi-deciduous shrubland that valleys, and a large population (>30 million). Th e Coast occurs in the Mediterranean-type climate of southern Ranges crest at 600 to 1200 m. Th e broad, fl at, Central and central coastal California, extending southward to Valley is drained by the Sacramento and San Joaquin Baja California, Mexico. Th e United States portion of Rivers into the Sacramento Delta and San Francisco coastal sage scrub covers some 684,000 ha (CDFFP Bay. Rugged Transverse Ranges, peaking at 3506 m, 2007). Coastal sage scrub is very diverse. Unfortunately, border the Los Angeles basin. Soils are complex, mostly it is subject to extensive human impacts in rapidly dry, and weakly developed with high calcium (Ca) developing coastal California. Dominant species concentrations. Summers are hot and dry (>18 oC), throughout the range are coastal sagebrush (Artemisia winters are mild (>0 oC) with precipitation from winter californica), Eastern Mojave buckwheat (Eriogonum Pacifi c Ocean storms; coastal fog is common May fasciculatum), sage (Salvia spp.), brittlebush (Encelia through July. Annual precipitation (200 to 1000 mm) spp.), and other shrub species, with highest shrub is highly variable and droughts are common. Vegetation diversity occurring in the southern range. Th e forbs, is characterized by chaparral, patches of oak woodland, primarily annual, are especially diverse, with many grassland, and some coniferous forest on upper species of concern under the Endangered Species Act mountain slopes. Th e chaparral has thickened, hardened occurring throughout the range of coastal sage scrub in foliage resistant to water loss and forms a cover of closely California. spaced, mostly evergreen shrubs 1 to 4 m tall. Common shrubs include chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), 13.2.2 Ecosystem Responses to N Deposition buckbrush (Ceanothus cuneatus), and manzanita Ecosystem responses to elevated nitrogen (N) in (Arctostaphylos spp.). Coastal sagebrush (Artemisia coastal sage scrub include increases in exotic invasive californica) and summer-deciduous plants that tolerate annual grasses, loss of native shrub and forb cover, more xeric conditions are found at lower elevations. A reduced diversity of native annual forbs and arbuscular blue oak-California foothills pine (Quercus douglasii- mycorrhizal fungi, and elevated N mineralization. Pinus sabiniana) woodland community forms a ring Plants in this low-productivity ecosystem respond around the Central Valley, which once had extensive quickly to N; thus changes in species abundance grasslands and riparian forests. Th e southern oak are excellent indicators of ecosystem response to N woodland extends into the Transverse and Peninsular pollution. Th is is unlike ecosystems with long-lived Ranges and includes Southern California walnut (Juglans vegetation, such as forests or chaparral, where initial californica) and Engelmann oak (Quercus englemannii). ecosystem responses to N are measured by changes Mixed-conifer forests (Minnich 1999) occur at a higher in biogeocycling or nutrient runoff (Aber et al. 1989, elevation than chaparral and include a variety of species Section 13.3.3). Chapter 13—Mediterranean California GTR-NRS-80 143 13.2.3 Range of Ecosystem Responses Observed detected changes in soil N dynamics at a lower level of -1 -1 Studies along anthropogenic N deposition gradients N deposition (10 versus 4 kg N ha yr ) than the study -1 -1 and in experimental N-fertilized plots have shown by Sirulnik et al. (2007) (20.2 versus 6.6 kg N ha yr ), alterations in soil N cycling, plant cover and diversity, the former are used to report the N deposition response and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nitrogen cycling threshold for mineralization. studies include fi eld and laboratory N mineralization measurements that show higher turnover of inorganic Vegetation cover and species richness. Coastal sage scrub is -1 N under high N deposition or fertilization (Sirulnik et subject to levels of total N deposition up to 20 kg ha -1 al. 2007, Vourlitis et al. 2007a, Vourlitis et al. 2007b). yr , as estimated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Plant cover and diversity studies were done along an Agency’s Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) N deposition gradient and show threshold losses of model (Tonnesen et al. 2007) in inland Riverside and native annual forb species of 45 percent (a decrease from San Bernardino Counties, an area that has been rapidly 67 to 37 species per site) under 10 kg N ha-1 yr-1 of converted to exotic annual grassland in the past 30 to 40 modeled and 7.8 kg ha-1 yr-1 measured N deposition.15 years (Allen et al. 1998, Talluto and Suding 2008). Th e A study of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was made on conversion to grassland is likely caused by a combination the same gradient and showed similar threshold losses of of elevated N deposition that promotes increased grass mycorrhizal root infection and diversity at many of the biomass and frequent fi re that prevents establishment of same sites showing plant loss under 9 kg N ha-1 yr-1 of native shrubs (Allen et al. 1998, Minnich and Dezzani modeled N deposition (Egerton-Warburton and Allen 1998, Talluto and Suding 2008). 2000), as described below. Vegetation-type conversion studies in coastal sage scrub Nitrogen mineralization and nitrifi cation. Several have examined patterns of vegetation change, but have fertilization studies conducted in coastal sage scrub not determined the N deposition response threshold. used high levels of N fertilizer, 50 to 60 kg N ha-1 yr-1 Research in the adjacent North American Deserts (Allen et al. 1998, Vourlitis et al. 2007a). However, two ecoregion related N deposition, exotic grass biomass, studies on N mineralization (production of ammonium and fuel for fi re to determine the N deposition response + - threshold (Fenn et al. 2010, Rao et al. 2010, Chapter (NH4 ) and nitrate (NO3 )) along an N deposition gradient in coastal sage scrub showed increased rates 12). of N mineralization in soils receiving 10 compared 15 to 4 kg N ha-1 yr-1 (Vourlitis et al. 2007b, Vourlitis A fi eld survey in 2003 determined the eff ects of N and Zorba 2007). Another fi eld experiment (Sirulnik on the native and exotic vegetation along a gradient of et al. 2007) tested the eff ects of elevated N on net N seven sites that ranged in N deposition from 8.7 to 19 -1 -1 mineralization and nitrifi cation in coastal sage scrub kg N ha yr (Fenn et al. 2010; Table 13.1). Nitrogen in sites with modeled (14.7 and 8.7, as modeled by deposition values reported are modeled wet plus dry Tonnesen et al. [2007]) and inferential (20.2 vs. 6.6 kg deposition on a 4-km grid (Tonnesen et al. 2007). In N ha-1 yr-1; Table 13.3) N deposition rates. Few changes addition, inferential calculations of N deposition are in N mineralization were observed, but nitrifi cation reported for three sites (Table 13.1). Th e inferential - method is used to calculate dry deposition to surfaces (production of NO3 ) was signifi cantly higher in high deposition than control plots on at least one date in all (plant canopies and soil) based on atmospheric 3 years (Sirulnik et al. 2007). Because the studies by concentrations of N pollutants, the deposition velocities Vourlitis et al. (2007b) and Vourlitis and Zorba (2007) of each pollutant, surface areas, and other factors (Fenn et al. 2009). Measurements of air quality, soil N, and 15 short-term deposition to leaf surfaces (Padgett et al. Allen, E.B. Unpublished data. Professor and natural resources extension specialist, Department of Botany 1999) confi rm this air pollution gradient. Extractable - + -1 and Plant Sciences and Center for Conservation Biology, soil N (NO3 plus NH4 ) ranged from 10 μg g at University of California, Riverside, CA 92521. the low end of the N gradient to 38 μg g-1 at the high 144 Chapter 13—Mediterranean California GTR-NRS-80 Table 13.1—Percent cover and richness (per 3 ha) of plant groups along an N deposition gradient in western Riverside County, California. Sites are arranged from north to south along an urban to rural gradient. Forb species richness in bold shows a rapid drop in richness, suggesting a critical load of 10 kg N ha-1 yr-1 by the CMAQ model (between 9.0 and 11.1 kg N ha-1 yr-1), and 7.8 kg N ha-1 yr-1 by the inferential method (between 6.6 and 8.9 kg N ha-1 yr-1). Site Exotic grass Native forb Shrub Native forbs soil N N deposition % cover % cover % cover no. of species μg g-1 kg N ha-1 yr-1 per 3 ha CMAQa Inferentialb Jurupa Hills 63.5 4.0 2.2 16 37.7 19.6 Box Springs 69.2 18.5 2.4 31 32.6 14.7 20.2 Botanic Garden 36.0 25.4 0.2 20 28.9 13.4 Lake Perris 0.5 26.1 2.8 30 20.3 11.1 Mott Reserve 6.7 14.3 11.2 37 30.6 11.1 8.9 Lopez Canyon 11.1 19.6 19.3 67 9.6 9.0 6.6 Tucalota Hills 1.5 35.7 35.0 50 10.5 8.7 aN deposition using the CMAQ model is reported as modeled wet plus dry deposition (Tonnesen et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion
    The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Strategic Framework for Conservation 2005 – 2025 Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) The Eastern Afrca Coastal Forests Ecoregon Strategc Framework for Conservaton 2005–2025 The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Publshed August 2006 Editor: Kimunya Mugo Design and layout: Anthony Mwangi Cover design: Kimunya Mugo Front cover main photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Front cover other photos: WWF-UK / Brent STIRTON / Getty Images Back cover photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Photos: John Salehe, David Maingi and Neil Burgess or as credited. © Graphics (2006) WWF-EARPO. All rights reserved. The material and geographic designations in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. WWF Eastern Africa Regional Programme Office ACS Plaza, Lenana Road P.O. Box 62440-00200 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 3877355, 3872630/1 Fax: +254 20 3877389 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.panda.org/earpo Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................................................... iv Foreword........................................................................................................................... v Lst of abbrevatons and acronyms.............................................................................. v A new approach to
    [Show full text]
  • Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM
    Ecoregion: Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM Grasslands INTRODUCTION About 25% of Earth’s land surface is covered by temperate grassland. These large expanses of flat or hilly country cover much of North America, as well as large areas of Europe, Asia, and South America. Most grasslands are found in the interiors of continents, where there is too little rainfall for a forest but too much rain for a desert. Art Explosion Art Explosion Rolling hills covered with grasses and very few trees A few scattered trees are found on savannas, are typical of North American grassland prairies. tropical grasslands of Africa. Temperate grasslands have subtle differences and different names throughout the world. Prairies and plains of North America are grasslands with tall grasses, while the steppes of Russia are grasslands with short grasses. Veldts are found in South Africa, the puszta in Hungary, and the pampas in Argentina and Uruguay. Savannas are tropical grasslands that support scattered trees and shrubs. They often form a transitional biome file:///Ecoregion/grass/content.html Page 1 of 6 Ecoregion: Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM between deserts and rain forests. Some temperate grasslands are also called savannas. The word savanna comes from the Spanish word zavanna, meaning “treeless plain.” Savannas cover almost half of Africa (mostly central Africa) and large areas of Australia and South America. ABIOTIC DATA The grassland climate is rather dry, averaging about 20 to 100 centimeters (8–40 inches) of precipitation a year. Summers are very hot and may reach 45°C (113°F). Winter temperatures often fall below freezing, which is 0°C (32°F).
    [Show full text]
  • Synchronous Fire Activity in the Tropical High Andes: an Indication Of
    Global Change Biology Global Change Biology (2014) 20, 1929–1942, doi: 10.1111/gcb.12538 Synchronous fire activity in the tropical high Andes: an indication of regional climate forcing R. M. ROMAN - C U E S T A 1,2,C.CARMONA-MORENO3 ,G.LIZCANO4 ,M.NEW4,*, M. SILMAN5 ,T.KNOKE2 ,Y.MALHI6 ,I.OLIVERAS6,†,H.ASBJORNSEN7 and M. VUILLE 8 1CREAF. Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, Facultat de Ciencies. Unitat d’ Ecologia Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain, 2Institute of Forest Management, Technische Universit€at Munchen,€ Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, Freising, 85354, Germany, 3Global Environmental Monitoring Unit, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, TP. 440 21020, Ispra, Varese 21027, Italy, 4School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX13QY, UK, 5Wake Forest University, Box 7325 Reynolda Station, Winston Salem, NC 27109-7325, USA, 6Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX13QY, UK, 7College of Life Sciences and Agriculture Durham, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA, 8Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences Albany, University of Albany, Albany, NY, USA Abstract Global climate models suggest enhanced warming of the tropical mid and upper troposphere, with larger tempera- ture rise rates at higher elevations. Changes in fire activity are amongst the most significant ecological consequences of rising temperatures and changing hydrological properties in mountainous ecosystems, and there is a global evi- dence of increased fire activity with elevation. Whilst fire research has become popular in the tropical lowlands, much less is known of the tropical high Andean region (>2000masl, from Colombia to Bolivia).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet- Central California Coast Ecoregion
    California State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) 2015 Central California Coast Region Annual and Perennial Grassland Habitat About Our Region and the Grassland Habitat Annual grassland habitats are open grasslands composed primarily of annual plant species such as introduced annual grasses and forbs. Annual grasslands also occur as understory plants in Valley Oak Woodland and other habitats. Perennial grassland habitats occur as coastal prairie and interspersed within annual grasslands. Vernal pools also are an important habitat component of many grassland systems. The structure of grasslands depends upon prevailing weather patterns and grazing. A number of wildlife species spend their entire life within grasslands while others use grasslands for foraging and breeding. What are the sensitive species found in the grassland habitat? The following 32 grassland dependent species from this region are found to be sensitive: Amphibian [3] CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER WESTERN SPADEFOOT RED-LEGGED FROG Reptile [1] BLUNT-NOSED LEOPARD LIZARD Bird [15] BURROWING OWL NORTHERN HARRIER CALIFORNIA CONDOR OREGON VESPER SPARROW GIANT KANGAROO RAT PURPLE MARTIN GRASSHOPPER SPARROW SAND-HILL CRANE GOLDEN EAGLE SHORT-EARED OWL LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE SWAINSON’S HAWK LONG-BILLED CURLEW TRICOLORED BLACKBIRD MOUNTAIN PLOVER Mammal [13] BIG FREE-TAILED BAT PALLID SAN DIEGO POCKET MOUSE CALIFORNIA LEAF-NOSED BAT POCKETED FREE-TAILED BATRINGTAIL HOARY BAT SOUTHERN GRASSHOPPER MOUSE JACUMBA POCKET MOUSE SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX LONG-EARED MYOTIS TOWNSEND BIG- EARED BAT MAINLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Moose Calving Strategies in Interior Montane Ecosystems
    Journal of Mammalogy, 88(1):139–150, 2007 MOOSE CALVING STRATEGIES IN INTERIOR MONTANE ECOSYSTEMS KIM G. POOLE,* ROBERT SERROUYA, AND KARI STUART-SMITH Aurora Wildlife Research, 2305 Annable Road, Nelson, British Columbia V1L 6K4, Canada (KGP) Serrouya & Associates, RPO #3, Box 9158, Revelstoke, British Columbia V0E 3K0, Canada (RS) Tembec Inc., British Columbia Division, P.O. Box 4600, Cranbrook, British Columbia V1C 4J7, Canada (KS) Parturient ungulates are relatively more sensitive to predation risk than other individuals and during other times of the year. Selection of calving areas by ungulates may be ultimately related to trade-offs between minimizing risk of predation and meeting nutritional needs for lactation. We used digital and field data to examine selection of calving areas by 31 global positioning system–collared moose (Alces alces) in southeastern British Columbia. We exam- ined movements 12 days before and after calving, and analyzed habitat selection at 2 scales of comparison: the immediate calving area to the extended calving area (100 ha), and the extended calving area to the surrounding home range. Maternal moose exhibited 1 of 2 distinct elevational strategies for calving area selection during the days leading up to calving: 16 moose were climbers and 15 were nonclimbers. Climbers moved a mean of 310 m higher in elevation to calve, whereas nonclimbers showed little change in elevation. Hourly movements by all maternal females increased 2- to 3-fold in the 1–4 days before calving and were generally directional, such that all calving areas were outside of areas used during the 12 days before calving. At the broad scale, elevation was the strongest predictor of the extended calving area within the home range.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiga Plains
    ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Taiga Plains Ecosystem Classification Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories Revised 2009 ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES TAIGA PLAINS This report may be cited as: Ecosystem Classification Group. 2007 (rev. 2009). Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Taiga Plains. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada. viii + 173 pp. + folded insert map. ISBN 0-7708-0161-7 Web Site: http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/index.html For more information contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Phone: (867) 920-8064 Fax: (867) 873-0293 About the cover: The small photographs in the inset boxes are enlarged with captions on pages 22 (Taiga Plains High Subarctic (HS) Ecoregion), 52 (Taiga Plains Low Subarctic (LS) Ecoregion), 82 (Taiga Plains High Boreal (HB) Ecoregion), and 96 (Taiga Plains Mid-Boreal (MB) Ecoregion). Aerial photographs: Dave Downing (Timberline Natural Resource Group). Ground photographs and photograph of cloudberry: Bob Decker (Government of the Northwest Territories). Other plant photographs: Christian Bucher. Members of the Ecosystem Classification Group Dave Downing Ecologist, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta. Bob Decker Forest Ecologist, Forest Management Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Hay River, Northwest Territories. Bas Oosenbrug Habitat Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Charles Tarnocai Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Tom Chowns Environmental Consultant, Powassan, Ontario. Chris Hampel Geographic Information System Specialist/Resource Analyst, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain
    92° 91° 90° 89° 88° Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Cape Girardeau 73cc 72 io Ri Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of This level III and IV ecoregion map was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and Literature Cited: PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Shannen S. Chapman (Dynamac Corporation), Oh ver environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map Barbara A. Kleiss (USACE, ERDC -Waterways Experiment Station), James M. ILLINOIS assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing 2003, Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative effort primarily between USEPA Region Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map) (supplementary supplement): Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, Omernik, (USEPA, retired), Thomas L. Foti (Arkansas Natural Heritage p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. 71 the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the VII, USEPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H., and Commission), and Elizabeth O. Murray (Arkansas Multi-Agency Wetland Bailey, R.G.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Planning Team). 37° environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Ecoregions of the United States
    (iii) ~ Agrl~:::~~;~":,c ullur. Description of the ~:::;. Ecoregions of the ==-'Number 1391 United States •• .~ • /..';;\:?;;.. \ United State. (;lAn) Department of Description of the .~ Agriculture Forest Ecoregions of the Service October United States 1980 Compiled by Robert G. Bailey Formerly Regional geographer, Intermountain Region; currently geographer, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and originally published as an unnumbered publication by the Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah In April 1979, the Agency leaders of the Bureau of Land Manage­ ment, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Geological Survey, and Soil Conservation Service endorsed the concept of a national classification system developed by the Resources Evaluation Tech­ niques Program at the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, to be used for renewable resources evaluation. The classifica­ tion system consists of four components (vegetation, soil, landform, and water), a proposed procedure for integrating the components into ecological response units, and a programmed procedure for integrating the ecological response units into ecosystem associations. The classification system described here is the result of literature synthesis and limited field testing and evaluation. It presents one procedure for defining, describing, and displaying ecosystems with respect to geographical distribution. The system and others are undergoing rigorous evaluation to determine the most appropriate procedure for defining and describing ecosystem associations. Bailey, Robert G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, 77 pp. This publication briefly describes and illustrates the Nation's ecosystem regions as shown in the 1976 map, "Ecoregions of the United States." A copy of this map, described in the Introduction, can be found between the last page and the back cover of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Guidelines for Mule Deer: California Woodland Chaparral Ecoregion
    THE AUTHORS : MARY L. SOMMER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME WILDLIFE BRANCH 1812 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 REBECCA L. BARBOZA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME SOUTH COAST REGION 4665 LAMPSON AVENUE, SUITE C LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720 RANDY A. BOTTA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME SOUTH COAST REGION 4949 VIEWRIDGE AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 ERIC B. KLEINFELTER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CENTRAL REGION 1234 EAST SHAW AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93710 MARTHA E. SCHAUSS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CENTRAL REGION 1234 EAST SHAW AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93710 J. ROCKY THOMPSON CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CENTRAL REGION P.O. BOX 2330 LAKE ISABELLA, CA 93240 Cover photo by: California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Suggested Citation: Sommer, M. L., R. L. Barboza, R. A. Botta, E. B. Kleinfelter, M. E. Schauss and J. R. Thompson. 2007. Habitat Guidelines for Mule Deer: California Woodland Chaparral Ecoregion. Mule Deer Working Group, Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 THE CALIFORNIA WOODLAND CHAPARRAL ECOREGION 4 Description 4 Ecoregion-specific Deer Ecology 4 MAJOR IMPACTS TO MULE DEER HABITAT 6 IN THE CALIFORNIA WOODLAND CHAPARRA L CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AND SPECIFIC 7 HABITAT GUIDELINES Long-term Fire Suppression 7 Human Encroachment 13 Wild and Domestic Herbivores 18 Water Availability and Hydrological Changes 26 Non-native Invasive Species 30 SUMMARY 37 LITERATURE CITED 38 APPENDICIES 46 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ule and black-tailed deer (collectively called Forest is severe winterkill. Winterkill is not a mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus ) are icons of problem in the Southwest Deserts, but heavy grazing the American West.
    [Show full text]
  • GLIMPSES of FORESTRY RESEARCH in the INDIAN HIMALAYAN REGION Special Issue in the International Year of Forests-2011
    Special Issue in the International Year of Forests-2011 i GLIMPSES OF FORESTRY RESEARCH IN THE INDIAN HIMALAYAN REGION Special Issue in the International Year of Forests-2011 Editors G.C.S. Negi P.P. Dhyani ENVIS CENTRE ON HIMALAYAN ECOLOGY G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment & Development Kosi-Katarmal, Almora - 263 643, India BISHEN SINGH MAHENDRA PAL SINGH 23-A, New Connaught Place Dehra Dun - 248 001, India 2012 Glimpses of Forestry Research in the Indian Himalayan Region Special Issue in the International Year of Forests-2011 © 2012, ENVIS Centre on Himalayan Ecology G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development (An Autonomous Institute of Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India) Kosi-Katarmal, Almora All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. ISBN: 978-81-211-0860-7 Published for the G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development by Gajendra Singh Gahlot for Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, 23-A, New Connaught Place, Dehra Dun, India and Printed at Shiva Offset Press and composed by Doon Phototype Printers, 14, Old Connaught Place, Dehra Dun India. Cover Design: Vipin Chandra Sharma, Information Associate, ENVIS Centre on Himalayan Ecology, GBPIHED Cover Photo: Forest, agriculture and people co-existing in a mountain landscape of Purola valley, Distt. Uttarkashi (Photo: G.C.S. Negi) Foreword Amongst the global mountain systems, Himalayan ranges stand out as the youngest and one of the most fragile regions of the world; Himalaya separates northern part of the Asian continent from south Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Antilles Mangroves
    Lesser Antilles mangroves - Encyclopedia of Earth http://www.eoearth.org/article/Lesser_Antilles_mangroves Encyclopedia of Earth Lesser Antilles mangroves Content Partner: World Wildlife Fund (other articles) Article Topics: Ecology , Conservation biology and Biodiversity This article has been reviewed and approved by the following Table of Contents Topic Editor: Mark McGinley (other articles) 1 Introduction Last Updated: November 17, 2008 2 Location and General Description 3 Biodiversity Features 4 Current Status 4.1 Types and Severity of Threats Introduction 5 Additional information on this ecoregion 6 Further Reading The small islands of the Lesser Antilles have less species diversity than the larger islands of the Greater Antilles but nonetheless have high levels of endemism. They also have a great diversity of habitats associated with environmental conditions related to differences in climate, elevation, rainfall, and salinity found in the different islands. Location and General Description The Lesser Antilles mangrove ecoregion is comprised of a chain of islands at the southeastern edge of the Caribbean Sea from Sombrero and Anguilla in the north, to Grenada in the south. An inner arc is of more recent volcanic origin and of higher elevation up to 1397 meters (m) on Martinique, while the outer arc consists of limestone on top of an eroded igneous rock layer, where elevation is much lower. Climate and rainfall levels are directly related to elevation, annual rainfall ranges from 750 millimeters (mm) on the outer island of Barbuda which has a tropical |arid climate, to 1928 mm on the inner island of Nevis, St. Kitts and Nevis. (Photograph by Roseau/Dominica where the climate is more tropical.
    [Show full text]