DOCSLIB.ORG

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Number R20088

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Number R20088 JANUARY 2021 [DRAFT] ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Number R20088 PREPARED FOR: MAGIC CITY DISCOVERY CENTER MINOT, NORTH DAKOTA Draft Environmental Assessment For Magic City Discovery Center Children’s Museum Prepared for the Children’s Museum of Minot Point of Contact: Kevin Ploof, REHS/RS Ackerman-Estvold 1907 17th Street SE Minot, ND 58701 [email protected] January 2021 Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUED) ............................................................................... vi ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUED) .............................................................................. vii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUED) ............................................................................. viii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUED) ............................................................................... ix 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................................................................... 4 1.4 INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION ........................................................... 5 Interagency Coordination and Consultations ....................................................................................... 5 Government-to-Government Consultations ......................................................................................... 5 Other Agency Consultations ................................................................................................................. 5 1.5 PUBLIC AND AGENCY REVIEW ...................................................................................................... 6 1.6 DECISION TO BE MADE ................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ................................................. 7 2.3 SELECTION STANDARDS FOR PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ............................................................. 9 2.2.3 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................... 10 Facility Construction Project ............................................................................................................ 10 3.1 SCOPE OF THE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................. 12 3.2 NOISE ................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 Definition of the Resource ................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2 Noise Metrics ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.2.3 Noise Regulations ................................................................................................................. 13 3.2.4 Ambient Noise Levels ........................................................................................................... 15 3.2.5 Construction Sound Levels .................................................................................................. 16 3.2.6 Description of the Affected Environment .......................................................................... 16 3.3 AIR QUALITY .................................................................................................................................. 17 3.3.1 Definition of the Resource ......................................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 Criteria Air Pollutants .................................................................................................................. 19 i 3.3.3 Description Of The Affected Environment ........................................................................ 24 3.4 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................................ 26 3.4.1 Definition of Resource ................................................................................................................ 26 3.4.2 Description of the Affected Environment................................................................................. 26 3.5 TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS .......................................................................................................... 28 3.5.1 Definition of the Resource ................................................................................................... 28 3.5.2 Description of the Affected Environment .......................................................................... 28 3.6 WATER RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................... 29 3.6.1 Definition of Resource ................................................................................................................ 29 3.6.2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 30 3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 34 3.7.1 Definition of the Resource ......................................................................................................... 34 3.7.2 Description of the Affected Environment................................................................................. 34 3.8 SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ..................................................................................... 38 3.8.1 Definition of Resource ......................................................................................................... 38 3.8.2 Description of the Affected Environment .......................................................................... 38 3.9 UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................... 40 3.9.1 Definition of the Resource ......................................................................................................... 40 3.9.2 Description of the Affected Environment................................................................................. 40 3.10 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTES ............................................................................... 43 3.10.1 Definition of the Resource ................................................................................................... 43 3.10.2 Description of the Affected Environment .......................................................................... 43 SECTION 3.11 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................... 45 3.11.1 Definition of Resource .............................................................................................................. 45 3.11.2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 46 4.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 49 4.2 NOISE ................................................................................................................................................... 50 4.2.1 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 50 4.3 AIR QUALITY........................................................................................................................................ 51 4.3.1 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 51 4.3.2 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................... 51 ii 4.3.3 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................... 52 4.4 LAND USE ............................................................................................................................................ 53 4.4.1 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................................... 53 4.4.2 Proposed Action .......................................................................................................................... 53 4.4.3 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................. 53 4.5 TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS ................................................................................................................ 54 4.5.1 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 54 4.5.2 Proposed Action ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015
    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial.
    [Show full text]
  • Minot Air Force Base | Vol. 56 • Issue 31 | Friday, August 3, 2018
    NORTHERN SENTRY FRIDAY, AUGUST 3, 2018 1 FREE | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | VOL. 56 • ISSUE 31 | FRIDAY, AUGUST 3, 2018 U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTO | AIRMAN 1ST CLASS ALYSSA M. AKERS 2 FRIDAY, AUGUST 3, 2018 NORTHERN SENTRY Airman posthumously receives Medal of Honor STAFF SGT. RYAN CONROY | 24TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS WING PUBLIC AFFAIRS URLBURT FIELD, home – which was common Fla. (AFNS) -- in the combat control career HThe White House fi eld. announced July 27, 2018, “He would come home from that Air Force Tech. Sgt. a long trip and immediately John Chapman will be have on his father hat – posthumously awarded the feeding, bathing, reading Medal of Honor Aug. 22, for and getting his girls ready his extraordinary heroism for bed,” said Chief Master during the Battle of Takur Sgt. Michael West, who Ghar, Afghanistan, in March served with Chapman through 2002. Combat Control School, a According to the Medal of three-year tour in Okinawa, Honor nomination, Chapman Japan, and at Pope AFB. distinguished himself on “They were his life and he the battlefi eld through was proud of them…to the Air “conspicuous gallantry and Force he was a great hero… intrepidity,” sacrifi cing his what I saw was a great father.” life to preserve those of his The Battle of Takur Ghar teammates. In conjunction with Making it look easy Operation Anaconda in March Chapman enlisted in the Air 2002, small reconnaissance Force Sept. 27, 1985, as an teams were tasked to establish information systems operator, observation posts in strategic but felt called to be part of locations in Afghanistan, Air Force special operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Minot Air Force Base | Vol
    NORTHERN SENTRY FRIDAY, AUGUST 4, 2017 1 FREE | FRIDAY, AUGUST 4, 2017 | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | VOL. 55 • ISSUE 31 U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTO | AIRMAN 1ST CLASS JONATHAN MCELDERRY 2 FRIDAY, AUGUST 4, 2017 NORTHERN SENTRY There and back again: a commander’s journey AIRMAN 1ST CLASS JESSICA WEISSMAN | 5TH BOMB WING PUBLIC AFFAIRS MINOT AIR FORCE come back to Minot as a Townsend said he is for Airmen here and at all both the 5th Bomb Wing and BASE, N.D., -- In 1992, commander,” he said. “[One honored to have served the missile and bomber bases the 91st Missile Wing.” a young college graduate of my responsibilities] was three tours at Minot AFB under the command. commissioned through the completing building 695, and and credits the people Townsend’s next adventure University of Oklahoma’s it was an honor to see that he’s worked with for his will take him to Barksdale Air Force Reserve Offi cer’s project through from start to successful career. AFB, Louisiana, to work Col. Kelvin Townsend, 91st Missile Training Course and began fi nish.” “What I plan to take to at Air Force Global Strike Wing vice commander, speaks at his going-away ceremony at Minot his journey in the U.S. Air Following his second tour my next job is the passion Command. Air Force Base, N.D., July 14, 2017. Force. at Minot, Townsend moved for the mission that I have “It’s been an honor, and After three separate tours to Minot Col. Kelvin Townsend, across the country again - learned from the men and I truly mean that,” said AFB, Townsend’s next assignment is 91st Missile Wing vice this time from New Mexico women I have served with Townsend.
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Stat. 1782 Public Law 96-418—Oct
    PUBLIC LAW 96-418—OCT. 10, 1980 94 STAT. 1749 Public Law 96-418 96th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1981, and Oct. 10, 1980 for other purposes. [H.R. 7301] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be Military cited as the "MiUtary Construction Authorization Act, 1981". Au'thSdon Act, 1981. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following acquisition and construc­ tion: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $16,350,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $14,200,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $129,960,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $1,000,000. Fort Drum, New York, $5,900,000. Fort Gillem, Georgia, $2,600,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $24,420,000. Fort Hunter-Liggett, California, $5,100,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $16,000,000. Fort Ord, California, $4,700,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $14,800,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $890,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $3,750,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia, $31,700,000. Presidio of San Francisco, California, $750,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $12,220,000. Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, $84,500,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort A.
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication. the Version of the Proposed Rule R
    This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication. The version of the proposed rule released today may vary slightly from the published document if minor editorial changes are made during the OFR review process. The document published in the Federal Register will be the official document. Appendix A to part 802- List of Military Installations Part 1 Site Name Location Adelphi Laboratory Center Adelphi, MD Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing Maui, HI Site Air Force Office of Scientific Research Arlington, VA Andersen Air Force Base Yigo, Guam Army Futures Command Austin, TX Army Research Lab – Orlando Simulations Orlando, FL and Training Technology Center Army Research Lab – Raleigh Durham Raleigh Durham, NC Arnold Air Force Base Coffee County and Franklin County, TN Beale Air Force Base Yuba City, CA Biometric Technology Center (Biometrics Clarksburg, WV Identity Management Activity) Buckley Air Force Base Aurora, CO Camp MacKall Pinebluff, NC Cape Cod Air Force Station Sandwich, MA Cape Newenham Long Range Radar Site Cape Newenham, AK Cavalier Air Force Station Cavalier, ND Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station Colorado Springs, CO Clear Air Force Station Anderson, AK Creech Air Force Base Indian Springs, NV Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Tucson, AZ Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, VA Eareckson Air Force Station Shemya, AK Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks, AK Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base Houston, TX Fairchild Air Force Base Spokane, WA Fort Benning Columbus, GA Fort Belvoir Fairfax County, VA Fort Bliss El Paso, TX Fort Campbell Hopkinsville, KY Fort Carson Colorado Springs, CO Fort Detrick Frederick, MD Fort Drum Watertown, NY Fort Gordon Augusta, GA Fort Hood Killeen, TX 129 This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Ages
    historical perspective Bomberfor the ages Boeing’s workhorse B-52 bomber has been on active duty for more than five decades—with no plans to retire soon By Eric Fetters-Walp “ It’s a privilege to hen the last B-52 Stratofortress rolled off Boeing’s The relationship between Boeing and the Air Force was production line in Wichita, Kan., in 1962, the aircraft reaffirmed last fall with a contract to modernize the B-52 weapon fly it, knowing how W already was the centerpiece of the U.S. strategic system and related components over an eight-year period. That long it’s been in bomber fleet during the Cold War. contract alone could be worth nearly $12 billion. The world has changed dramatically since then, yet the B-52 Meanwhile, Boeing also is providing engineering services and service, how many remains a workhorse for the U.S. Air Force, and that isn’t likely upgrades, as well as advanced communications technology, for other aviators have to change anytime soon. Already operational for more than half the B-52 fleet. In 2010, the first B-52 outfitted with Combat Net- the era of powered flight, the B-52 is slated to stay in service work Communications Technology, or CONECT, flew and tested flown it and how until 2040. the system, which allows for more networked and instant commu- “It’s been an amazingly resilient airplane as it has aged. It nication. Boeing also has a contract to design future capability well it’s served.” has turned out to be very robust when it comes to accepting allowing B-52s to communicate via secure broadband satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Minot Air Force Base | Friday, February 1, 2019
    NORTHERN SENTRY FRIDAY,FEBRUARY 1, 2019 1 FREE | VOL. 57 • ISSUE 05 | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2019 Airmen inside the Air Traffi c Control tower supervise the fl ight line at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., Jan. 18, 2019. Controllers communicate with aircraft to monitor local airspace and allow them access onto the runway. U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTO | AIRMAN JESSE JENNY 2 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2019 NORTHERN SENTRY US Air Force Thunderbirds set to perform Super Bowl LIII flyover NELLIS AIR FORCE sung. They will take off for BASE, Nev. (AFNS) -- the Super Bowl LIII fl yover he United States from Dobbins Air Reserve Air Force Air Base, Marietta, Georgia. Demonstration The Thunderbirds last fl ew TSquadron over the Super Bowl in 2017 Thunderbirds are scheduled to at the NRG Stadium, Houston. conduct a fl yover during the The Thunderbirds’ team is Goldfein gets up national anthem performance composed of eight pilots, four at Super Bowl LIII, Feb. 3, support offi cers, 120 enlisted close view of new over Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Airmen and three civilians Atlanta. serving in 28 Air Force job T-X trainer “Supporting this event is specialties. In 2019, the a tremendous honor for the Thunderbirds are scheduled to CHARLES POPE | SENIOR WRITER | SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PUBLIC AFFAIRS team and the U.S. Air Force,” perform at 65 air shows in 33 ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) To be sure, Goldfein capacity is impressive,” he said, said Lt. Col. John Caldwell, diff erent locations all over the -- took note of the technical noting that the new trainer will Thunderbirds commander world.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Minot Air Force Base | Friday, May 31, 2019
    NORTHERN SENTRY FRIDAY, MAY 31, 2019 1 FREE | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | VOL. 57 • ISSUE 22 | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | FRIDAY, MAY 31, 2019 Archbishop Broglio visits Minot U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTO | SENIOR AIRMAN DILLON J. AUDIT 2 FRIDAY, MAY 31, 2019 NORTHERN SENTRY Air Force announces artificial intelligence research with MIT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PUBLIC AFFAIRS ARLINGTON, Va. (AFNS) Wilson said. -- The partnership will Secretary of the Air address a broad range of AI Force Heather Wilson projects such as decision announced a contract with support, maintenance and Massachusetts Institute of logistics, talent management, Technology, May 20, focused medical readiness, situational on accelerating artifi cial awareness, business operations intelligence technologies and disaster relief. through fundamental research “This collaboration is very in computational intelligence, much in line with MIT’s core reasoning, decision-making, value of service to the nation,” autonomy and relevant societal said Maria Zuber, MIT’s vice implications. The agreement president for research and the includes selecting eleven E.A. Griswold professor of Airmen for a research and geophysics. “MIT researchers development collaboration who choose to participate will team designed to fi eld practical bring state-of-the-art expertise AI solutions for real-world, in AI to advance Air Force national security challenges. mission areas and help train Air Beginning this summer, the Force personnel in applications combined offi cer and enlisted of AI.” team representing various Air As part of its Science and Force career fi elds, is expected Technology Strategy, the Air to work with researchers at Force launched a number of MIT to harness the university’s similar partnerships with higher student talent, renowned faculty education institutions around and state-of-the art facilities the U.S., each with a diff erent Recovery and laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN SENTRY Team Minot Hosts Distinguished Visitors
    FREE | WWW.NORTHERNSENTRY.COM | VOL. 59 • ISSUE 20 | MINOT AIR FORCE BASE | FRIDAY, MAY 14, 2021 OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP AWARDS 2021 Congratulations to the four winners of The Huddle’s 2021 Outstanding Leadership Award! Out of 27 nominees, these four were selected for their dedication to the mission and fellow Airmen, and their excellent leadership skills. To see more about The Huddle Awards, see pages A4-A5 U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTOS ENTER WE’LL BUY WEEKLY! No Limit, Enter As Many Times YOU DINNER! As You Wish! blgrill.com i 1400 31st ave i minot, nd i 701-852-7335 DETAILS ON PAGE C3 HOME OF THE GLOBAL STRIKER Minot AFB Videos Only The BEST Come North! WWW.MINOT.AF.MIL CONTACT MINOT AFB PUBLIC AFFAIRS 701.723.6212 • [email protected] Minot Air Force Base 2 FRIDAY, MAY 14 2021 NORTHERN SENTRY Team Minot hosts distinguished visitors ABIGAIL KINDER, NORTHERN SENTRY As the United States Air their leadership. We were able to Will there be problems with Force moves into a newer era of join civic leaders with [military] the budget? Sen. Hoeven said, strategic deterrence, leaders from leaders last evening and engage “Everything gets debated in all over the country are taking them in discussions as well, and Washington D.C. The budget, part in important discussions talk about the level of support for based on conversations I’ve about the future and reliability our service members...” had... is doing well in the Senate. of the nation’s nuclear force. After the brief, visitors There’s been more pushback in On April 30, 2021, Team Minot were given a tour of a B-52 the House, but I think we’re hosted several distinguished Stratofortress and were able to going to be on track.” visitors for an exclusive tour of fi nd out more information about Hoeven explained that the the base and an opportunity to the 5th Bomb Wing mission GBSD is already in development learn about what Team Minot and Global Strike Command as and has plans to be completed does on a day-to-day basis.
    [Show full text]